Medion Erazer Major X20 recension: Notebook för spel med RTX 4070 och solid hårdvara

Name: Medion Erazer Major X20
Brand: Medion

Uppgraderad. Medions tungt utrustade bärbara dator för spel har en stor 16-tumsskärm (QHD+, 240 Hz, G-Sync) i 16:10-format, ett mekaniskt tangentbord, 32 GB RAM-minne och hela 2 TB lagringsutrymme. En Core i9-13900HX och en GeForce RTX 4070 driver den kraftfulla datormonstret.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (översatt av DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 04/26/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake Thunderbolt Windows

Medion Erazer Major X20 är i första hand en bärbar dator för spel, men den är också avsedd för andra datorintensiva tillämpningar. Jämfört med föregångaren https://www.notebookcheck.net/Medion-Erazer-Major-X10-laptop-review-Debut-of-Intel-Arc-A730M.650477.0.htmlhar X20 fått några användbara uppgraderingar: den Arc A730M grafikkärnan har fått ge plats åt en betydligt kraftfullare GeForce RTX 4070. Dessutom ersätter ett mekaniskt tangentbord chiclet-modellen, medan en av de två USB-C-portarna (USB 3.2 Gen 2) har tagits bort och den återstående har uppgraderats till en Thunderbolt 4-port.

X20 är baserad på en Tongfang barebone (GM6PX7X), som i stort sett liknar den modell som är känd från XMG Neo 16, men porten för vattenkylning saknas. Bland konkurrenterna finns bärbara datorer som t.ex Aorus 15X ASF, den Razer Blade 15 OLED (Tidig 22) och Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI.

Test device courtesy of Medion

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Medion Erazer Major X20

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 140 W PL2 / Short Burst, 140 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 2175 MHz, Minne: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.3161, Optimus

Minne

32 GB

, DDR5-4800, Dual-Chanel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Skärm

16.00 tum 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixlar 189 PPI, BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, glansig: nej, 240 Hz

Moderkort

Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)

Hårddisk

Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R, 1024 GB

, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 1813 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Headset combined port, Mic-in, Kortläsare: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0

Nätverk

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 29 x 357 x 269

Batteri

62.3 Wh, 4100 mAh Litiumpolymer

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webbkamera: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Mechanical, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), 24 Månader Garanti

Vikt

2.366 kg, Strömförsörjning: 980 g

Pris

2499 Euro

Länkar

Medion hemsida
Medion kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89 %	04/2023	Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	29 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.2 %	04/2023	Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	19.7 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
89.9 %	03/2023	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2 kg	16.99 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
88.4 %	04/2023	Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	30.7 mm	17.30"	2560x1440

Fodral - Ett diskret yttre för Medions bärbara dator

Medion använder ett elegant, sobert chassi som inte sticker ut, inte ens i en professionell miljö. Baksidan av locket på det mattsvarta fodralet är tillverkat av aluminium, basenheten av plast. En halkfri gummibeläggning täcker basenhetens ovansida. Förutom tangenternas bakgrundsbelysning (RGB), två fritt konfigurerbara LED-remsor (RGB) inuti de bakre luftventilerna och den upplysta Erazer-logotypen på locket luckrar upp det annars seriöst utseende fallet

Den 16 tums rackaren avslöjar inga tillverkningsfel. Spaltmåtten är jämna och det finns inga materialutsprång. Basenheten kan bara vridas något, locket tydligare, men hela enheten ligger inom rimliga gränser. Batteriet (skruvat, inte limmat) och andra interna komponenter är tillgängliga efter att bottenskalet avlägsnats. Gångjärnen håller locket stadigt på plats och den maximala öppningsvinkeln är cirka 130 grader. Det är möjligt att öppna locket med en hand.

I jämförelsefältet är Medions bärbara dator en av de enheter som har den tjockaste konstruktionen. När det gäller vikten hamnar den i mitten av fältet.

Storleksjämförelse

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI Medion Erazer Major X20 Aorus 15X ASF Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) DIN A4 ❌

Utrustning - Major X20 erbjuder Thunderbolt 4

Erazer har tre USB-A-portar (1x USB 3.2 Gen 1, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2) och en USB-C-port (Thunderbolt 4). Den sistnämnda matar ut en DisplayPort-signal, men ger inget stöd för Power Delivery. Major X20 har också totalt två videoutgångar (HDMI 2.1, DP). Ytterligare anslutningar inkluderar en plats för ett kabellås, två ljuduttag och en Gigabit Ethernet-port (2,5 Gbps)

Videoutgångarna, strömningsfacket och nätverksporten finns på baksidan av enheten. Motsvarande kablar löper alltså från baksidan och är inte i vägen.

Vänster sida: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), mikrofoningång, kombinationsljud: Kabelspår, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), mikrofoningång, kombinationsljud

Bakåt: Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; DisplayPort), HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet (2,5 GBit/s), strömkontakt

Höger sida: minneskortläsare, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A)

SD-kortläsare

MicroSD-minneskortläsaren (referenskort: AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) hör till de medelstarka modellerna med en maximal överföringshastighet på 78 MB/s (överföring av 250 jpg-bildfiler på cirka 5 MB vardera) och 88 MB/s (kopiering av stora datablock).

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)	98.4 MB/s +26%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	80.8 MB/s +4%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	78 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)	121.3 MB/s +38%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	88 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	84.1 MB/s -4%

Kommunikation

WiFi-datahastigheten är utmärkt under optimala förhållanden (inga WLAN-enheter i omedelbar närhet, litet avstånd mellan den bärbara datorn och serverdatorn). X20 har ett WiFi 6E-chip (Intel AX211) ombord. Trådbundna anslutningar hanteras av ett chip (RTL8125; 2,5 GBit/s) från Realtek.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1662 (1535^min - 1766^max) MBit/s +18%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1650 MBit/s +17%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1407 (1338^min - 1463^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1793, n=153, last 2 years)	1272 MBit/s -10%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1248 (589^min - 1505^max) MBit/s -11%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1861, n=186)	1243 MBit/s -12%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1707 (1657^min - 1730^max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1680 (1647^min - 1705^max) MBit/s -2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1477 (1339^min - 1623^max) MBit/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=159, last 2 years)	1403 MBit/s -18%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=186)	1394 MBit/s -18%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1180 (1047^min - 1233^max) MBit/s -31%

Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1407 (1338-1463)

Aorus 15X ASF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1229 (589-1505)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1651 (1561-1736)

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1663 (1535-1766)

Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1707 (1657-1730)

Aorus 15X ASF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1180 (1047-1233)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1476 (1339-1623)

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1680 (1647-1705)

Webbkamera

Webbkameran (2,1 MP, max. 1 920 x 1 080) ger standardkvalitet. Färgnoggrannheten är bristfällig: vid en färgavvikelse på cirka 11 missar man målet (DeltaE mindre än 3). Ingen mekanisk slutare finns ombord.

ColorChecker Medion Erazer Major X20: 10.63 ∆E min: 1.46 - max: 23.48 ∆E

Tillbehör

Förutom de vanliga dokumenten (snabbstartguide och garantiinformation) ingår inga andra tillbehör i den bärbara datorn.

Underhåll

Efter att ha tagit bort alla skruvar på enhetens undersida kan bottenskalet lossas med hjälp av en platt spatel eller en fogslätare. Du har då tillgång till de två RAM-platserna (båda upptagna), de två SSD-enheterna (PCIe 4, M.2-2280), WLAN-modulen, fläktarna, BIOS-batteriet och batteriet till den bärbara datorn.

Garanti

Medion ger två års garanti på Erazer i Tyskland. Detta kan skilja sig åt i andra länder, så köpare bör dubbelkolla innan de köper.

Garantiförlängningar finns tillgängliga men måste köpas tillsammans med den bärbara datorn i Medions webbutik. Ett efterföljande köp är inte möjligt.

Inmatningsenheter - Mekaniskt tangentbord med Cherry MX-switchar

Tangentbord

I stället för ett chiclet-tangentbord har Medion installerat ett mekaniskt tangentbord i X20. Cherry MX-omkopplarna har en medelhög rörelse och en tydligt hörbar och märkbar tryckpunkt. Användaren blir bortskämd med en fyllig skrivkänsla och exakt återkoppling, och tangentbordet ger inte efter under skrivandet. Två funktionstangenter reglerar ljusstyrkan hos den individuella fyrstegsbelysningen av tangenterna (RGB). På det hela taget kan vi tala om ett gediget tangentbord här.

Pekplatta

En klickplatta (ca 11,6 x 7,2 cm) med multitouchfunktion fungerar som musersättning. Den släta ytan gör det lätt att glida med fingrarna. Den erbjuder korta resor och en tydlig tryckpunkt. Ett fingertryck på lysdioden i det övre vänstra hörnet sätter hela kudden på eller stänger av den.

Skärm - QHD+ i 16:10-format

Medion installerar en 240 Hz-panel med G-Sync-stöd. Det senare justerar dynamiskt uppdateringsfrekvensen för skärmen och GPU:n för att skapa den jämnaste möjliga bildkvaliteten - särskilt när du spelar.

PWM-flimmer förekommer inte vid någon ljusstyrka. Ljusstyrkan och kontrasten på den matta 16-tumspanelen (2560x1600) i det arbetsvänliga 16:10-formatet når respektive mål (> 300 cd/m² eller 1000:1).


346 cd/m²	345 cd/m²	349 cd/m²
348 cd/m²	374 cd/m²	362 cd/m²
357 cd/m²	369 cd/m²	364 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 374 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 357.1 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 374 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1133:1 (Svärta: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.4
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
70.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.191

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Medion Erazer Major X20 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Aorus 15X ASF BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.60	Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI BOE0B69, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Display		-0%	25%	22%
Display P3 Coverage	69.4	69.3 0%	97.6 41%	98.3 42%
sRGB Coverage	98	98.2 0%	99.4 1%	100 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70.9	70.5 -1%	94 33%	85.9 21%
Response Times		-12%	79%	21%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	13.1 ?(6, 7.1)	12.4 ?(6, 6.4) 5%	2 ?(1, 1) 85%	5.3 ?(2.4, 2.9) 60%
Response Time Black / White *	7.3 ?(3.1, 4.2)	9.4 ?(4.9, 4.5) -29%	2 ?(1, 1) 73%	8.6 ?(3.7, 4.9) -18%
PWM Frequency			500 ?(70)
Screen		14%	126%	12%
Brightness middle	374	316 -16%	383 2%	327 -13%
Brightness	357	301 -16%	384 8%	320 -10%
Brightness Distribution	92	90 -2%	99 8%	89 -3%
Black Level *	0.33	0.28 15%	0.03 91%	0.38 -15%
Contrast	1133	1129 0%	12767 1027%	861 -24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.43	1.54 37%	1.89 22%	1.01 58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.97	2.46 38%	3.76 5%	4.01 -1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.4	1.21 14%	2.67 -91%	0.41 71%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.1	1.3 58%	1.26 59%	1.6 48%
Gamma	2.191 ^100%	2.307 ^95%	2.41 ^91%	2.168 ^101%
CCT	6194 ^105%	6456 ^101%	6386 ^102%	6659 ^98%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		1% / 7%	77% / 97%	18% / 16%

* ... smaller is better

Skärmen ger en bra färgrepresentation i levererat skick: Målet (DeltaE < 3) uppnås med en avvikelse på cirka 2,4. Manuell kalibrering minskar avvikelsen till 1,4 och säkerställer en mer balanserad gråskala

Panelen täcker helt sRGB-färgrymden, men inte AdobeRGB- och DCI-P3-färgrymderna. Om alla tre färgrymderna krävs finns det inget sätt att komma runt den.Blade 15's OLED-skärm.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
7.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.1 ms rise
7.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
13.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Den stabila IPS-panelen med en visningsvinkel kan läsas från vilken position som helst. Det är möjligt att läsa skärmen utomhus om solen inte är för stark.

Prestanda - Raptor Lake och Ada Lovelace driver den bärbara speldatorn

Spel, rendering och i allmänhet alla prestandakrävande tillämpningsområden hör till Erazer Major X20:s användningsområden. Raptor Lake och Ada Lovelace ger den nödvändiga datorkraften. Den här modellen är tillgänglig för cirka 2 500 euro (~2 500 US-dollar).

Provningsförhållanden

X20 har tre tillverkarspecifika strömlägen (se tabell) som du kan välja via en separat knapp (bredvid strömknappen). En status-LED avslöjar vilket läge som är aktivt. "Turbo Mode" (benchmarks) och "Office Mode" (batteritester) användes. Optimus var aktivt.

Individuella profiler kan skapas med hjälp av den förinstallerade programvaran Control Center. Till exempel kan effektgränserna för CPU, TGP för GPU och/eller de övre temperaturgränserna justeras.

Vi använde det engelskspråkiga gränssnittet i CC-programvaran eftersom den tyska översättningen delvis misslyckades. Du kan växla mellan de två språken.

	Turbo Mode (dt: Overboost)	Balance Mode (dt: Balanced)	Office Mode (dt: Balanced)
CPU PL1 (HWInfo)	140 watt	140 watt	140 watt
CPU PL2 (HWInfo)	140 watt	140 watt	140 watt
Buller (Witcher 3 )	50-53 dB(A)	48-51 dB(A)	36-43 dB(A), senare 32-34 dB(A)
Prestanda (Witcher 3 )	124 fps	118 fps	114-118 fps, senare 30 fps låsning

Processor

The Core-i9-13900HX (Raptor Lake) består av åtta prestandakärnor (hyperthreading, 2,2-5,4 GHz) och sexton effektivitetskärnor (ingen hyperthreading, 1,6-3,9 GHz). Totalt finns det 32 logiska CPU-kärnor. Resultaten från benchmarken ligger i nivå med CPU:ns genomsnittliga hastigheter.

CPU-testerna i riktmärket Cinebench R15 kördes vid höga till maximala klockfrekvenser i nätdrift. Prestandan för en tråd (222 poäng), som är relevant för daglig användning, sjunker betydligt mindre i batteriläge än prestandan för flera trådar (1025 poäng).

CB15-slingtestet visar att en hög turboklocka konsekvent upprätthålls vid belastning av flera trådar i nätdrift. Klockfrekvensen sjunker endast minimalt under testets gång.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4327 (4285.41-4407.71)

Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø2776 (2691.43-3460.13)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2191 (2149.96-2543.07)

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX: Ø4920 (4749.47-5204.94)

CPU:s klockfrekvens under utförandet av CB15-slingan (Turbo Mode)

CPU:s klockfrekvens under utförandet av CB15-slingan (balanserat läge)

CPU:s klockfrekvens under utförandet av CB15-slingan (Office Mode)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	82 pt
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	80.1 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	80.1 pt
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	64.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	60.2 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	51.7 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	32379 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (24270 - 32623, n=22)	28225 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	27788 Points
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	20297 Points -27%
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=232, last 2 years)	19581 Points -30%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	15600 Points -44%
Single Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1867 - 2105, n=19)	2044 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2036 Points
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	1897 Points -7%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	1863 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=230, last 2 years)	1816 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	1721 Points -15%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9152 - 12541, n=20)	10766 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	10484 Points
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	10025 Points -4%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	7852 Points -25%
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years)	7442 Points -29%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	6007 Points -43%
CPU (Single Core)
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (722 - 810, n=20)	784 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	777 Points
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	726 Points -7%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	712 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years)	699 Points -10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	662 Points -15%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	5205 (4749.47^min - 5204.94^max) Points +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (3913 - 4970, n=21)	4522 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	4407.71 Points
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	3460 Points -22%
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=235, last 2 years)	3101 Points -30%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	2543 Points -42%
CPU Single 64Bit
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	297 Points
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	294 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (247 - 304, n=21)	292 Points -2%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	277 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=234, last 2 years)	268 Points -10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	249 Points -16%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	220 Seconds * -95%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)	198.9 Seconds * -76%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	181 Seconds * -60%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (101 - 153, n=21)	117.9 Seconds * -4%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	113 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	100 Seconds * +12%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	123364 MIPS +9%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	113598 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (90675 - 127283, n=20)	111796 MIPS -2%
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=229, last 2 years)	77274 MIPS -32%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	74733 MIPS -34%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	63825 MIPS -44%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	7332 MIPS +6%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	6895 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (6340 - 7177, n=20)	6848 MIPS -1%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	6407 MIPS -7%
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=229, last 2 years)	6133 MIPS -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	5367 MIPS -22%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17614 - 21075, n=21)	19809 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	19213 Points
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	18372 Points -4%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	15191 Points -21%
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years)	13627 Points -29%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	12215 Points -36%
Single-Core
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	2053 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2033 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1345 - 2093, n=21)	1988 Points -2%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	1860 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=234, last 2 years)	1811 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	1661 Points -18%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	33.8 fps +17%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (23.5 - 34.4, n=21)	29.1 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	28.9 fps
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years)	21.3 fps -26%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	19.7 fps -32%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	17.3 fps -40%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	50.7 s * -20%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years)	49.1 s * -16%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	45.7 s * -8%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	43.6 s * -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (32.8 - 51.1, n=20)	42.5 s * -0%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	42.4 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	0.503 sec * -28%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years)	0.4687 sec * -20%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	0.4403 sec * -12%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	0.4159 sec * -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.375 - 0.4564, n=21)	0.402 sec * -2%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.3922 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

4407.71 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

264.8 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

297 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

Performance Rating
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	96.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	65.8 pt
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	65.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	50.4 pt
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	49.8 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	42.4 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	52479 KRay/s +109%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	25147 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=21)	24097 KRay/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=225, last 2 years)	18634 KRay/s -26%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17289 KRay/s -31%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	13493 KRay/s -46%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	227882 Points +82%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	125161 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 137015, n=21)	120602 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=225, last 2 years)	93571 Points -25%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86201 Points -31%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	71736 Points -43%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	8525 MB/s +37%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	6234 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=21)	6061 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=225, last 2 years)	4332 MB/s -31%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3879 MB/s -38%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3400 MB/s -45%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	180473 Points +35%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	134141 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=21)	133924 Points 0%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	110085 Points -18%
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=225, last 2 years)	109573 Points -18%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	106137 Points -21%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	29598 Points +93%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15349 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=21)	14889 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=225, last 2 years)	12203 Points -20%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11602 Points -24%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9706 Points -37%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	118401 Points +88%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	62932 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=21)	59821 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=225, last 2 years)	47882 Points -24%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	42851 Points -32%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34034 Points -46%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	167732 MB/s +40%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	147294 MB/s +23%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 237881, n=21)	139015 MB/s +16%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119757 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=225, last 2 years)	107712 MB/s -10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99217 MB/s -17%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2090 MB/s +16%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1804 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=21)	1755 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=225, last 2 years)	1213 MB/s -33%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1092 MB/s -39%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	1064 MB/s -41%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	28105 KRay/s +105%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13736 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=21)	13066 KRay/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=225, last 2 years)	10089 KRay/s -27%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9194 KRay/s -33%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	7268 KRay/s -47%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=21)	48439 MPixel/s +13%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	42994 MPixel/s
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=226, last 2 years)	36818 MPixel/s -14%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	35342 MPixel/s -18%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34573 MPixel/s -20%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34312 MPixel/s -20%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	31421 MPixel/s -27%

Systemets prestanda

Det smidigt fungerande systemet saknar inte datorkraft. Den bärbara datorn klarar spel, rendering och videoredigering utan problem, vilket bekräftas av de goda PCMark-resultaten. Överföringshastigheterna för RAM-minnet ligger på en normal nivå för DDR5-4800-minne.

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)	7592 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	7575 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (6956 - 8153, n=3)	7561 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7449 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7336 Points -3%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	7178 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	11653 Points
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	11166 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9865 - 11653, n=3)	10940 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)	10731 Points -8%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	10705 Points -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10328 Points -11%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	11087 Points +13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10024 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	9850 Points
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)	9725 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9470 - 9850, n=3)	9685 Points -2%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9637 Points -2%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)	11476 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9776 - 13370, n=3)	11141 Points +8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10350 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	10278 Points
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9731 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	9062 Points -12%

CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2065 Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2037 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1842 - 2029, n=3)	1947 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years)	1881 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1842 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1730 Points -6%

CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1960 Points +15%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1917 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1700 - 1872, n=3)	1795 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years)	1791 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1700 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1641 Points -3%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2313 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2088 - 2316, n=3)	2238 Points +7%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2193 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2088 Points
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years)	2046 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1883 Points -10%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2016 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years)	1704 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1671 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1557 - 1752, n=3)	1639 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1608 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1573 Points -2%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4889 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		6067 poäng
PCMark 10 Score		7575 poäng
Hjälp

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=21)	75033 MB/s +11%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67755 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=225, last 2 years)	59453 MB/s -12%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	57467 MB/s -15%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	55639 MB/s -18%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	48948 MB/s -28%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=21)	82199 MB/s +11%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73998 MB/s
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66898 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=225, last 2 years)	63375 MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	61461 MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	59759 MB/s -19%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=21)	73168 MB/s +12%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	65604 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=225, last 2 years)	61670 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58602 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58073 MB/s -11%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	55411 MB/s -16%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99.4 ns * -10%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	90.6 ns *
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=222, last 2 years)	87.3 ns * +4%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.8 ns * +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=21)	86.3 ns * +5%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.2 ns * +5%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-latenstid

Det standardiserade testet för övervakning av latens (webbsurfning, uppspelning av 4k-video, Prime95 hög belastning) visade på avvikelser. Systemet verkar inte vara lämpligt för video- och ljudredigering i realtid. Framtida programuppdateringar kan förbättra detta eller leda till ytterligare försämring.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1813 μs * -3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1752.1 μs *
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1489 μs * +15%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	933.2 μs * +47%

* ... smaller is better

Lagringsenheter

Erazer har två SSD-diskar på 1 TB (PCIe 4, M.2-2280) från Phison, som överlag ger bra prestanda. SSD-enheterna bildar inte en RAID-array och X20 erbjuder inte heller RAID-stöd - en SSD-enhet fungerar som systemenhet och den andra som datalagring. En positiv aspekt: termisk strypning observerades inte.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7038 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5008 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 942.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 783.9 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3007 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 3328 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.06 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 263.2 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	92.4 pt
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	85.4 pt
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	80.6 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	80.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	74.7 pt
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	51.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3564 (3515.46^min - 3563.69^max) MB/s +13%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=199, last 2 years)	3539 MB/s +12%
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3419 (3322.79^min - 3419.41^max) MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3377 (3319.03^min - 3377.04^max) MB/s +7%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3127 - 3582, n=3)	3287 MB/s +4%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3153 (2810.23^min - 3153.26^max) MB/s
seq write
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=199, last 2 years)	3829 MB/s +53%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3531 (3391.93^min - 3530.77^max) MB/s +41%
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3270 (3004.03^min - 3269.84^max) MB/s +30%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (2507 - 3714, n=3)	3146 MB/s +25%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2743 (2563.98^min - 2742.87^max) MB/s +9%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2507 MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	7018 (6152.48^min - 7017.7^max) MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	6966 (5571.08^min - 6965.69^max) MB/s
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (6956 - 6976, n=3)	6966 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6663 (6017.91^min - 6663.07^max) MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (2268 - 16089, n=199, last 2 years)	6390 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	5018 (4382.25^min - 5017.89^max) MB/s -28%
seq q8 t1 write
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4980 (4904.66^min - 4979.58^max) MB/s +34%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=199, last 2 years)	4818 MB/s +29%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3723 - 5011, n=3)	4573 MB/s +23%
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4398 (3867.15^min - 4398.16^max) MB/s +18%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3723 (3590.69^min - 3723.28^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3125 (3099.17^min - 3124.97^max) MB/s -16%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	81.2 (79.58^min - 81.23^max) MB/s +42%
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	73.5 (69.87^min - 73.51^max) MB/s +28%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=199, last 2 years)	67.9 MB/s +19%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (56.8 - 84.3, n=3)	66.1 MB/s +16%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	57.2 (55.31^min - 57.16^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	53.7 (52.37^min - 53.65^max) MB/s -6%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	346 (334.68^min - 346.11^max) MB/s +26%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (275 - 295, n=3)	284 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	275 (272.08^min - 274.75^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=199, last 2 years)	224 MB/s -19%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	212 (209.62^min - 211.78^max) MB/s -23%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	163.8 (162.54^min - 163.76^max) MB/s -40%
4k q32 t16 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4152 (4133.05^min - 4152.1^max) MB/s +16%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3578 (3566.03^min - 3578.13^max) MB/s
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3543 - 3578, n=3)	3557 MB/s -1%
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3552 (3501.51^min - 3552.08^max) MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=199, last 2 years)	2590 MB/s -28%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	857 (717.83^min - 857.03^max) MB/s -76%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3610 (3279.33^min - 3609.84^max) MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3607 (3566.02^min - 3606.71^max) MB/s
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3398 - 3688, n=3)	3564 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3512 (3421.77^min - 3511.78^max) MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=199, last 2 years)	2152 MB/s -40%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	305 (269.91^min - 305.05^max) MB/s -92%

AS SSD
Score Total
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9097 Points +7%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (8477 - 8906, n=3)	8641 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	8541 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7180 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=186, last 2 years)	6843 Points -20%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4118 Points -52%
Score Read
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3530 Points +6%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3332 - 3464, n=3)	3397 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3332 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2858 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (760 - 4721, n=186, last 2 years)	2508 Points -25%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1204 Points -64%
Score Write
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3794 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3583 Points
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3399 - 3707, n=3)	3563 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=186, last 2 years)	3120 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2916 Points -19%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2387 Points -33%
Seq Read
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=186, last 2 years)	4963 MB/s +4%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (4774 - 5200, n=3)	4925 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	4774.16 MB/s
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4649.46 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4623.95 MB/s -3%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3846 MB/s -19%
Seq Write
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3290 - 4309, n=3)	3842 MB/s +17%
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3810.26 MB/s +16%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=186, last 2 years)	3673 MB/s +12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3551.32 MB/s +8%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3289.95 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1821 MB/s -45%
4K Read
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	100.75 MB/s +44%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (60.6 - 97.3, n=3)	76 MB/s +9%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	69.95 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (30.4 - 112.1, n=186, last 2 years)	66.9 MB/s -4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	60.3 MB/s -14%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	51.29 MB/s -27%
4K Write
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	308.92 MB/s +83%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (168.4 - 294, n=3)	213 MB/s +26%
Average of class Gaming (96.3 - 512, n=186, last 2 years)	211 MB/s +25%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	196.8 MB/s +17%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	183.9 MB/s +9%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	168.39 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2964.13 MB/s +6%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (2784 - 2854, n=3)	2828 MB/s +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2784.37 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2335.71 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming (442 - 3475, n=186, last 2 years)	1939 MB/s -30%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	768 MB/s -72%
4K-64 Write
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3103.89 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3085.54 MB/s
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (2831 - 3086, n=3)	2966 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=186, last 2 years)	2544 MB/s -18%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2376.83 MB/s -23%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2008 MB/s -35%
Access Time Read
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.121 ms * -55%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.083 ms * -6%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (0.078 - 0.086, n=3)	0.083 ms * -6%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	0.078 ms *
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.068 ms * +13%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=184, last 2 years)	0.05343 ms * +31%
Access Time Write
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=186, last 2 years)	0.04639 ms * -102%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	0.023 ms *
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.022 ms * +4%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (0.013 - 0.023, n=3)	0.01967 ms * +14%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.019 ms * +17%
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.012 ms * +48%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R: Ø6907 (6078.6-6965.9)

Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø6780 (4751.1-7024.62)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6602 (5678.43-6643.28)

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00: Ø5008 (4471.34-5022.68)

Grafikkort

Inga (fler) experiment: Medan Medion installerade en av de då nya Arc GPU:erna från Intel iMajor X10har X20 en GeForce RTX 4070 bärbar dator kort (VRAM: 8 192 GB GDDR6) från Nvidia. Detta har en maximalt möjlig TGP på 140 watt (115 watt + 25 watt Dynamic Boost) till sitt förfogande, vilket inte utnyttjas fullt ut enligt testet Witcher 3.

Benchmarkresultaten ligger över det tidigare RTX 4070-genomsnittet - en betydande prestandaökning märks jämfört medArc A730M GPU i Major X10. dGPU-läget ger inga förbättringar. Växling mellan dGPU och Optimus kräver ingen omstart - Advanced Optimus stöds.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	97.5 pt
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	97.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	95.9 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	93 pt
Average of class Gaming	92 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	85.1 pt
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	60.6 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	42773 Points
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	41422 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=232, last 2 years)	40487 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24229 - 45606, n=49)	40234 Points -6%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	39104 Points -9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	36023 Points -16%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	26822 Points -37%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	166954 Points +13%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	165811 Points +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (54238 - 193851, n=20)	149792 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	147464 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	145558 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=142, last 2 years)	136246 Points -8%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	75370 Points -49%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	30809 Points
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	30596 Points -1%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	29950 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=236, last 2 years)	29457 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (16212 - 33451, n=48)	29156 Points -5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	27183 Points -12%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	20179 Points -35%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	12551 Points
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=234, last 2 years)	12066 Points -4%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	12042 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	11761 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (6241 - 13336, n=48)	11728 Points -7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	10157 Points -19%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	8677 Points -31%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		60496 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance		35727 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		66380 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		27130 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		12846 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

Blender | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.0 | V-Ray 5 Benchmark | V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	26 Seconds * -37%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 142, n=180, last 2 years)	23.1 Seconds * -22%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	22 Seconds * -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18 - 28, n=47)	21.6 Seconds * -14%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	20 Seconds * -5%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	19 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	45 Seconds * -36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 172, n=51)	43.7 Seconds * -32%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=187, last 2 years)	39.8 Seconds * -21%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	36 Seconds * -9%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	34 Seconds * -3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	33 Seconds *

Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 226512, n=233, last 2 years)	121546 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	121179 Points
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	118531 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	116873 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	115659 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (17391 - 129366, n=47)	112282 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	20185 Points -83%
Vulkan Score
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	65743 Points +647%
Average of class Gaming (1952 - 160279, n=229, last 2 years)	42001 Points +377%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (4898 - 93339, n=46)	39229 Points +346%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	20299 Points +131%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	18599 Points +111%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	9322 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	8799 Points

Geekbench 6.0
GPU Vulkan
Average of class Gaming (1827 - 159996, n=43, last 2 years)	46212 Points +374%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9221 - 108353, n=11)	26012 Points +167%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	19109 Points +96%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	9751 Points
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	9221 Points -5%
GPU OpenCL
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	120609 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	117340 Points
Average of class Gaming (30029 - 213472, n=44, last 2 years)	116331 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (100544 - 120609, n=11)	113594 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	104147 Points -11%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=127, last 2 years)	2038 mpaths +21%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	1687 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (171 - 1868, n=26)	1630 mpaths -3%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	1619 mpaths -4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	1480 mpaths -12%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=130, last 2 years)	1468 mpaths +18%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	1244 mpaths
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	1214 mpaths -2%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	1186 mpaths -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (120 - 1333, n=26)	1174 mpaths -6%
CPU
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	19198 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10005 - 19998, n=25)	14474 mpaths -25%
Average of class Gaming (1690 - 26944, n=142, last 2 years)	13420 mpaths -30%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	12060 mpaths -37%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	10360 mpaths -46%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	625 mpaths +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	610 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (500 - 686, n=33)	602 mpaths -1%
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=187, last 2 years)	601 mpaths -1%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	577 mpaths -5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	445 mpaths -27%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	88 mpaths -86%
CPU
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	35173 ksamples +21%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	28958 ksamples
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12638 - 35173, n=33)	20883 ksamples -28%
Average of class Gaming (2741 - 37629, n=187, last 2 years)	19222 ksamples -34%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	18429 ksamples -36%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	15575 ksamples -46%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Arc A730M, Intel Core i7-12700H	15474 ksamples -47%

* ... smaller is better

Spelprestanda

Den bärbara datorn gör det möjligt att spela i QHD med höga till maximala inställningar. Högre upplösningar är möjliga om man använder en extern bildskärm - eventuellt med lägre inställningar. Bildfrekvenserna i de testade titlarna ligger över det fastställda RTX 4070-genomsnittet. dGPU-läget kan öka bildfrekvensen i vissa spel i liten utsträckning.

Performance Rating - Percent
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	98.4 pt
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	96.4 pt
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	93.2 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	89.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	88.9 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	80.8 pt
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M	41.9 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	127 (107^min) fps
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	121 (104^min) fps -5%
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=227, last 2 years)	117.1 fps -8%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117 (101^min) fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69.8 - 133.7, n=50)	111.1 fps -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	96.4 (82^min) fps -24%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M	49.4 (40^min) fps -61%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	128 (5.76^min, 90.9^P1) fps
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117.8 (27.4^min, 83.3^P1) fps -8%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	114 (5.84^min, 76.9^P1) fps -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	113 (16.1^min, 76.9^P1) fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (63.5 - 137.6, n=42)	111.4 fps -13%
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=218, last 2 years)	107.4 fps -16%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M	42.8 (2.99^min, 29.4^P1) fps -67%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	121.2 fps
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117.5 fps -3%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	114.3 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (66 - 131, n=45)	111.7 fps -8%
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=228, last 2 years)	111.4 fps -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	100.3 fps -17%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M	49.7 (13^min) fps -59%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	210 (60.1^min, 158^P1) fps +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	208 (11.2^min, 156.4^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=226, last 2 years)	207 fps 0%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	201 (45.1^min, 149.8^P1) fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (117.7 - 234, n=45)	197.1 fps -5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	173.4 (30.1^min, 131.1^P1) fps -17%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M	124.1 (92.7^min, 98.3^P1) fps -40%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	163.4 (135.4^min) fps +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	158.8 (136.2^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (89.7 - 185.3, n=46)	149.5 fps -6%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	149.4 (125.9^min) fps -6%
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=238, last 2 years)	142.8 fps -10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	133 (114.4^min) fps -16%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M	80.4 (58.6^min) fps -49%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	128.5 fps +6%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	120.8 fps
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117.1 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (72.2 - 144.4, n=48)	107.2 fps -11%
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 166.2, n=243, last 2 years)	102 fps -16%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	95 fps -21%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M	38.6 fps -68%

För att kontrollera om bildfrekvensen förblir i stort sett konstant under en längre tid körde vi spelet "The Witcher 3" i cirka 60 minuter i Full HD-upplösning och med maximala kvalitetsinställningar. Spelkaraktären flyttades inte. Någon minskning av bildfrekvensen registrerades inte.

Witcher 3 FPS chart

Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; FPS: Ø123.2 (117-126)

Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø115.6 (108-120)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø91.3 (87-96)

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø118.2 (110-124)

Medion Erazer Major X10 i7-12700H, A730M: Ø48.4 (46-52)

GPU-mätningar under Witcher 3 -testet (Turbo Mode, Optimus)

GPU-mätningar under Witcher 3 -testet (Turbo Mode, dGPU)

GPU-mätningar under Witcher 3 -testet (Office Mode, Optimus)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	187.3	187.2	183.8	128	72.6
The Witcher 3 (2015)	545	391.4	242.3	127
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	205	183.3	169.9	158.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	220	175.2	121.2		88.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	182.3	155.9	120.8
Far Cry 5 (2018)	188	161	153	144	122
Strange Brigade (2018)	490	310	244	208	131.4
F1 22 (2022)	262	264	206	83.9	53.3

Utsläpp - Erazers bärbara dator kan ge upphov till mycket buller

Buller

X20 kan producera mycket buller under belastning: toppvärden på upp till 57 dB(A) uppnås när "Turbo Mode" är aktivt. Bakgrundsljudet är något som liknar ett väsande ljud. Inget störande bakgrundsljud avges av fläktarna. En totalt sett lägre ljudnivå kan åstadkommas genom att använda de två andra prestandaprofilerna - på bekostnad av beräkningskraften.

Utsläppen vid tomgångskörning och vid daglig användning (kontor, internet) är tilltalande: fläktarna arbetar med mycket låga varvtal och är ofta tomgångskörning - i alla tre prestandaprofilerna.

	Turbo Mode (dt: Overboost)	Balanced Mode (dt: Balanced)	Office Mode (dt: Balanced)
CPU PL1 (HWInfo)	140 watt	140 watt	140 watt
CPU PL2 (HWInfo)	140 watt	140 watt	140 watt
Buller (Witcher 3 )	50-53 dB(A)	48-51 dB(A)	36-43 dB(A) senare 32-34 dB(A)
Prestanda (Witcher 3 )	124 fps	118 fps	114-118 fps senare 30 fps Lock

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		25 / 29 / 31 dB(A)
Hög belastning		50 / 57 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise		-5%	7%	5%
off / environment *	24	25 -4%	26 -8%	25 -4%
Idle Minimum *	25	28 -12%	28 -12%	26 -4%
Idle Average *	29	29 -0%	28 3%	29 -0%
Idle Maximum *	31	36 -16%	28 10%	30 3%
Load Average *	50	50 -0%	38.5 23%	46 8%
Witcher 3 ultra *	53	54 -2%		46 13%
Load Maximum *	57	58 -2%	43.9 23%	47 18%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Vid daglig användning (kontor, internet) håller sig temperaturen på den bärbara datorn inom det gröna intervallet. Den bärbara datorn värms upp märkbart under belastning (stresstest, Witcher 3 test), men inte överdrivet mycket. CPU-temperaturerna är inget att oroa sig för.

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


46 °C	46 °C	45 °C
44 °C	44 °C	34 °C
28 °C	30 °C	30 °C

Max: 46 °C
Medel: 38.6 °C


46 °C	49 °C	46 °C
40 °C	46 °C	36 °C
24 °C	24 °C	33 °C

Max: 49 °C
Medel: 38.2 °C

Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


36 °C	33 °C	37 °C
34 °C	33 °C	32 °C
28 °C	28 °C	27 °C

Max: 37 °C
Medel: 32 °C


38 °C	38 °C	36 °C
35 °C	37 °C	34 °C
25 °C	25 °C	27 °C

Max: 38 °C
Medel: 32.8 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 29 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


45 °C	43 °C	42 °C
41 °C	42 °C	33 °C
31 °C	28 °C	28 °C

Max: 45 °C
Medel: 37 °C


42 °C	43 °C	44 °C
41 °C	41 °C	33 °C
24 °C	24 °C	28 °C

Max: 44 °C
Medel: 35.6 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 47 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).

	Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat		16%	3%	12%
Maximum Upper Side *	46	42 9%	49.5 -8%	42 9%
Maximum Bottom *	49	51 -4%	47.5 3%	41 16%
Idle Upper Side *	37	27 27%	33.4 10%	33 11%
Idle Bottom *	38	26 32%	35 8%	34 11%

* ... smaller is better

Stresstest

Stresstestet (Prime95 och Furmark i kontinuerlig drift) utgör ett extremt scenario för att testa systemets stabilitet under full belastning. CPU:n börjar testet med hög klockfrekvens (P: 4 GHz, E: 3,3 GHz), medan GPU:n startar med 1,5 till 2 GHz. Under de första fem minuterna sjunker CPU-klockan gradvis till 2-2,4 GHz (P-kärnor) och 1,9-2,1 GHz (E-kärnor). Samtidigt ökar GPU-klockan till 2,3-2,4 GHz.

Högtalare

Stereohögtalarna ger ett mycket bra ljud, men skulle behöva mer bas. Hörlurar eller externa högtalare rekommenderas för bättre ljudkvalitet.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Medion Erazer Major X20 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Aorus 15X ASF audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energihantering - Medion X20 ger magra driftstider

Effektförbrukning

Den bärbara datorn från Medion uppvisar inga avvikelser när det gäller energiförbrukning. Hastigheterna ligger på en normal nivå för den installerade hårdvaran. Testet Witcher 3 och stresstestet kördes med relativt konstant energiförbrukning. Strömförsörjningen (330 watt) är alltså tillräckligt stor.

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.1 / Watt
Låg belastning	12 / 16 / 26 Watt
Hög belastning	115 / 319 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		7%	-46%	-6%	9%	-3%
Idle Minimum *	12	11 8%	31.6 -163%	15 -25%	12.1 ?(4.3 - 26.7, n=41) -1%	13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=179, last 2 years) -15%
Idle Average *	16	16 -0%	33.3 -108%	20 -25%	16.9 ?(4.6 - 34.1, n=41) -6%	19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=179, last 2 years) -20%
Idle Maximum *	26	24 8%	38.6 -48%	29 -12%	24.1 ?(9 - 55.4, n=41) 7%	27 ?(9 - 101.1, n=179, last 2 years) -4%
Load Average *	115	104 10%	149 -30%	121 -5%	99 ?(59.2 - 178, n=40) 14%	111.3 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years) 3%
Witcher 3 ultra *	191.6	185.4 3%	149.6 22%	179.8 6%
Load Maximum *	319	272 15%	160 50%	246 23%	220 ?(107 - 319, n=40) 31%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years) 21%

* ... smaller is better

Energieaufnahme Witcher 3 / Stresstest

Medion Erazer Major X20; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø191.6 (183.8-199.7)

Medion Erazer Major X20; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø242 (226-265)

Medion Erazer Major X20; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø16.3 (11.7-26.8)

Power consumption with an external monitor

Medion Erazer Major X20; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø169.5 (164.9-199.4)

Medion Erazer Major X20; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø186.6 (183.3-188.4)

Medion Erazer Major X20; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø211 (207-216)

Medion Erazer Major X20; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø184.9 (177.1-196.5)

Medion Erazer Major X20; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø20.8 (19.4-26.8)

Batteritid

I WLAN-testet uppnår 16-tummare körtider på 3:52 timmar och 4:12 timmar (laddning av webbplatser med hjälp av ett skript) respektive videotest (kortfilm Big Buck Bunny, H.264-kodning, FHD, i en slinga). Den bärbara datorns energisparfunktioner var avaktiverade under båda testerna och skärmens ljusstyrka sattes till cirka 150 cd/m². Radiomodulerna var också avaktiverade under videotestet.

De generellt sett under genomsnittet liggande körtiderna beror på den låga batterikapaciteten (62,3 Wh) för en bärbar dator för spel. Mer skulle ha varit möjligt med 80 Wh-batteriet i föregångaren.

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		5tim 45min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 112)		3tim 52min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		4tim 12min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		1tim 36min

	Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 62.3 Wh	Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		80%	26%	-21%	41%
Reader / Idle	345	679 97%	404 17%		542 ?(57 - 1290, n=84, last 2 years) 57%
H.264	252	472 87%	352 40%	166 -34%	397 ?(56 - 747, n=93, last 2 years) 58%
WiFi v1.3	232	489 111%	274 18%	255 10%	368 ?(57 - 745, n=182, last 2 years) 59%
Load	96	118 23%	125 30%	58 -40%	84.1 ?(36 - 173, n=144, last 2 years) -12%
Witcher 3 ultra				64	80.6 ?(47 - 155, n=23, last 2 years)

För

+ QHD+-skärm i 16:10-format

+ bra färgåtergivning

+ G-Sync och Advanced Optimus

+ smal bildskärmsram

+ hög systemprestanda

+ RAM-minne utbytbart/utökningsbart

+ 2 PCIe 4 SSD-enheter med 1 TB vardera

+ Thunderbolt 4

+ mekaniskt tangentbord

+ termisk pasta av flytande metall

Emot

- RTX 4070 endast medelklass på grund av 8 GB VRAM

- högljudd under belastning

- ingen Power Delivery

- dålig batteritid

Domslut: Massor av utrustning

Medion Erazer Major X20, tillhandahållen av Medion.

Den här kraftfulla bärbara datorn möjliggör QHD+-spel, men briljerar även på andra områden. A Core i9-13900HX och en GeForce RTX 4070 arbetar med konstant höga klockfrekvenser, två SSD-diskar på 1 TB säkerställer korta laddningstider och tillräckligt med lagringsutrymme. Buller- och värmeutvecklingen ligger i det höga intervallet, vilket är typiskt för den här klassen av bärbara datorer.

Med Erazer Major X20 presenterar Medion en välutrustad bärbar dator för spel i mellanklassen utan några allvarliga svagheter.

Chiclet-tangentbordet från den tidigare modellen har fått ge plats åt en mekanisk modell (Cherry MX-switchar, RGB-belysning för individuella tangenter) - en betydande förbättring. Användare som inte är vana vid ett sådant tangentbord kommer att upptäcka en ny skrivupplevelse.

Den matta 16-tumsskärmen (QHD+, IPS, 240 Hz, G-Sync, sRGB) i ett arbetsvänligt 16:10-format ger ett bra intryck överlag. En Thunderbolt 4-port säkerställer expansionsmöjligheter (extern GPU, dockningslösning, skärm), men stöder inte Power Delivery. Batteritiderna är inte heller imponerande.

The Aorus 15X ASF är ett alternativ med betydligt bättre löptider. Den erbjuder samma grafikprestanda som X20, men mindre processorkraft.

Pris och tillgänglighet

Den granskade konfigurationen av Medion Erazer Major X20 finns i Medions webbutik till ett pris på strax under 2 500 euro, men är för närvarande slutsåld. Tillgängligheten av modellen verkar för närvarande vara begränsad utanför Tyskland.

Medion Erazer Major X20 - 2023-04-20 04/20/2023 v7
Sascha Mölck

Design

83 / 98 → 85%

Tangentbord

90%

Mus

86%

Anslutningar

68 / 80 → 85%

Vikt

61 / 10-66 → 90%

Batteri

57 / 95 → 59%

Skärm

90%

Spelprestanda

100%

Programprestanda

96%

Temperatur

85 / 95 → 90%

Ljudnivå

68 / 90 → 75%

Audio

85%

Camera

47 / 85 → 55%

Medel

78%

89%

Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 915 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Medion Erazer Major X20 recension: Notebook för spel med RTX 4070 och solid hårdvara

Sascha Mölck, 2023-04-26 (Update: 2023-04-26)

Medion Erazer Major X20 recension: Notebook för spel med RTX 4070 och solid hårdvara

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Fodral - Ett diskret yttre för Medions bärbara dator

Storleksjämförelse

Utrustning - Major X20 erbjuder Thunderbolt 4

SD-kortläsare

Kommunikation

Webbkamera

Tillbehör

Underhåll

Garanti

Inmatningsenheter - Mekaniskt tangentbord med Cherry MX-switchar

Tangentbord

Pekplatta

Skärm - QHD+ i 16:10-format

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Prestanda - Raptor Lake och Ada Lovelace driver den bärbara speldatorn

Provningsförhållanden

Processor

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

Systemets prestanda

DPC-latenstid

Lagringsenheter

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Grafikkort

Spelprestanda

Witcher 3 FPS chart

Utsläpp - Erazers bärbara dator kan ge upphov till mycket buller

Buller

Temperatur

Stresstest

Högtalare

Medion Erazer Major X20 audio analysis

Aorus 15X ASF audio analysis

Energihantering - Medion X20 ger magra driftstider

Effektförbrukning

Energieaufnahme Witcher 3 / Stresstest

Power consumption with an external monitor

Batteritid

För

Emot

Domslut: Massor av utrustning

Pris och tillgänglighet

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare