Beelink GTI15 Ultra recension: En av de mest fullfjädrade minidatorerna för storleken

Name: Beelink GTI15 Ultra
Brand: Beelink

Högtalare och mikrofoner inbyggda.

GTI15 Ultra är ännu snabbare än tidigare med Arrow Lake-H och 10 Gbps RJ-45 LAN-portar. Men högtalarna har fortfarande inte förbättrats sedan GTI13 Ultra-tiden.
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (översatt av DeepL / Ninh Duy) Publicerad 11/30/2025 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
Arrow Lake Mini PC

Omdöme - Optimerad för röstaktivering, prestanda och AI-acceleration

GTI12 Ultra GTI12 Ultra var ett stort steg upp från GTI11 eftersom det var en helt ny design. GTI15 Ultra använder samma design som GTI12 Ultra, men uppgraderingarna av processorprestanda är tillräckligt betydande för att vara en värdefull uppgradering för prestandajägare. De integrerade stereohögtalarna, de fyra mikrofonerna, PSU:n och eGPU-stödet gör Beelink-systemet renare och mer mångsidigt än de flesta andra minidatorer på marknaden, inklusive de från GMK.

Testa enheten med tillstånd av Beelink

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Några aspekter av modellen skulle kunna göras ännu bättre. De integrerade högtalarna skulle till exempel kunna vara högre för större rum eller konferenser. Verktygslös demontering skulle också göra det mycket enklare att rengöra eller uppgradera RAM-minnet och SSD-enheten. En LED RGB-bar eller indikator på enhetens framsida skulle passa bra ihop med de fyra mikrofonerna och röstaktiveringsfunktionen. GTI15 Ultra är annars en av de mest kompletta minidatorerna vi har testat med tanke på den långa listan med integrerade funktioner och dedikerat eGPU-stöd.

Det höga priset på GTI15 Ultra kan inte ignoreras eftersom modellen har lanserats under en världsomspännande RAM- och SSD-brist. Med en bra bit över 1000 USD är systemet betydligt dyrare än de utgående modellerna GTI13 eller GTI14. Beelink erbjuder tyvärr inga barebones-alternativ som kan hjälpa till att sänka startpriserna.

För

+ integrerade stereohögtalare och quad-mikrofon

+ integrerad PSU, ingen AC-adapter krävs

+ eGPU-stöd via direkt PCIe5 x8

+ dubbla 10 Gbps RJ-45

+ relativt tyst

Emot

- tyngre och större än en genomsnittlig mini-PC

- service är mer komplicerat

- högtalarna kunde vara högre

Pris och tillgänglighet

Beelink GTI15 Ultra levereras nu på Amazon för $ 1230 som konfigurerad i denna recension.

$1,229.00

Beelink GTi15 Mini PC, Intel Ultra 9 285H (up to 5.4GHz) 16C/16T, Mini Computer 64GB DDR5 6400MHz 1TB PCIe4.0 SSD, Triple Display HDMI&DP/USB-C/WiFi7/BT5.4/NPU/4K 144Hz/Support AI/W-11 Pro

Innehållsförteckning

Omdöme - Optimerad för röstaktivering, prestanda och AI-acceleration
Specifikationer
Fallet
Anslutningsmöjligheter
Prestanda
Utsläpp
Energiförvaltning
Notebookcheck Betyg
Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

GTI15 Ultra är en intern uppdatering av förra årets GTI14 Ultra eller GTI13 Ultra. Den byter ut den äldre Raptor Lake-H-processorn mot nyare Arrow Lake-H-alternativ tillsammans med andra mindre externa förändringar. Dess chassi är annars nästan identiskt med GTI13 Ultra och så många av våra befintliga kommentarer gäller fortfarande för den här senaste modellen.

Vår testenhet levereras med Core Ultra 9 285H CPU, 64 GB RAM och 1 TB SSD för cirka $ 1230 USD. Högre alternativ ökar RAM-minnet och SSD till 128 GB respektive 2 TB, men det finns tyvärr inga barebones-alternativ.

GTI15 Ultra konkurrerar med andra högpresterande minidatorer som GMK EVO-T1 eller BOSGAME M2.

Fler recensioner av Beelink:

Specifikationer

Beelink GTI15 Ultra

Processor

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H 16 x 4.5 - 5.4 GHz, 54 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-H

Grafikkort

Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Kärna: 2350 MHz, DDR5, 32.0.101.8247

Minne

64 GB

, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, Micron, 46-45-45-90

Moderkort

Intel Arrow Lake-H PCH

Ljudkort

Intel Arrow Lake-U/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Anslutningar

4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB4 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm combo, Kortläsare: SD

Nätverk

Intel E610-XT2 (10/100/1000/2500/5000/10000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 55.8 x 158 x 158

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbordsbelysning: nej, HDMI cable, Control Center, 12 Månader Garanti

Vikt

1.32 kg, Strömförsörjning: 73 g

Pris

1200 USD

Amazon

$1,229.00

Länkar

Beelink hemsida

Obs: Tillverkaren kan använda komponenter från olika leverantörer inklusive bildskärmspaneler, enheter eller minnesstickor med liknande specifikationer.

se alla specifikationer

Fallet

GTI15 Ultra har integrerade högtalare och en intern 145 W PSU för att skilja sig från konkurrenterna, precis som GTI13 Ultra. Detta innebär att systemet endast kräver en vanlig universalströmkabel istället för några specialiserade nätadaptrar till skillnad från de allra flesta minidatorer eller bärbara datorer på marknaden. I gengäld är dock systemet något större och tyngre för kategorin.

Dockningsstationen EX Pro har fortsatt stöd via PCIe5 x8-kortplatsen under minidatorn för installation av extern grafik. Mer information om dockningsstationen finns i vår recension här.

Jämförelse av storlek

Anslutningsmöjligheter

Inte alla portar från GTI13 Ultra har återvänt, eftersom GTI15 Ultra har två färre USB-A-portar längs baksidan. Å andra sidan har de två RJ-45-portarna uppgraderats från 2,5 Gbps till 10 Gbps vardera.

Observera att endast den bakre USB-C-porten stöder Power Delivery. Thunderbolt stöds inte officiellt.

Baksida: AC-strömförsörjning, USB-C 4.0 med DisplayPort 1.4 + Power Delivery (40 Gbps), 3,5 mm headset, HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a, 2x RJ-45 (10 Gbps), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2 (10 Gbps)

SD-kortläsare

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	206 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	249.6 MB/s

Kommunikation

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1405 (1297^min - 1536^max) MBit/s +29%
GMK NucBox K12 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1193 (1001^min - 1325^max) MBit/s +9%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1189 (589^min - 1283^max) MBit/s +9%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1093 (623^min - 1267^max) MBit/s
BOSGAME M2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1048 (916^min - 1169^max) MBit/s -4%
Beelink SER9 Pro	580 (458^min - 645^max) MBit/s -47%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1582 (1543^min - 1618^max) MBit/s +12%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1414 (1250^min - 1521^max) MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1152 (616^min - 1293^max) MBit/s -19%
BOSGAME M2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1048 (830^min - 1181^max) MBit/s -26%
Beelink SER9 Pro	851 (780^min - 908^max) MBit/s -40%
GMK NucBox K12 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	819 (705^min - 979^max) MBit/s -42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1094 (963^min - 1211^max) MBit/s +11%
BOSGAME M2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1008 (959^min - 1072^max) MBit/s +2%
GMK NucBox K12 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	999 (530^min - 1123^max) MBit/s +2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	984 (805^min - 1153^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1090 (1026^min - 1157^max) MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1008 (911^min - 1052^max) MBit/s -8%
GMK NucBox K12 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	860 (829^min - 889^max) MBit/s -21%
BOSGAME M2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	729 (652^min - 857^max) MBit/s -33%

Beelink GTI15 Ultra; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø984 (805-1153)

Beelink GTI15 Ultra; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1090 (1026-1157)

Underhåll

Service är mer komplicerat på de nyare SEI-modellerna på grund av den integrerade PSU:n och högtalarna. RAM- och SSD-modulerna sitter under nätaggregatet, högtalarna, det skyddande metallnätet och det yttre plasthöljet som alla sitter fast med minst ett dussin Phillips-skruvar. De flesta andra mini-datorer tenderar att vara lättare och enklare att ta isär.

Ångkammarkylaren och fläkten sitter på motsatt sida av moderkortet, vilket gör dem svårare att rengöra. Detta drag är dock vanligt på de flesta mini PC-design.

För att komma åt de två SODIMM-platserna och de två M.2 2280 SSD-platserna krävs ytterligare demontering

Hållbarhet

Beelink har inte angett att några återvunna material har använts vid tillverkningen. Samtidigt använder förpackningen en del plast för inplastningen.

Prestanda

Testförhållanden

Systemet är som standard inställt på Balanced mode som endast kan ändras till Performance mode via BIOS. Att ställa in Windows i Performance-läge har minimal eller ingen effekt.

Processor

Rå CPU-prestanda är cirka 10 till 15 procent långsammare än på GMK EVO-T1 konfigurerad med exakt samma Core Ultra 9 285H processor som körs i prestandaläge. Att ställa in Beelink i Performance-läge via BIOS hjälper till att minska gapet om ytterligare prestanda önskas. Intel-processorn är ändå upp till 10 procent och 20 procent snabbare än de konkurrerande Ryzen 7 H 255 när den kör enkeltrådade respektive flertrådade belastningar.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H: Ø2582 (2556.24-2596.05)

Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255: Ø2565 (2544.37-2588.16)

GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255: Ø2505 (2493.14-2513.98)

GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H: Ø3047 (3002.55-3112.11)

BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2493 (2069.54-2584.65)

Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700: Ø3227 (2729.26-4061.33)

Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK: Ø2398 (2374.03-2412.84)

CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance rating
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	88 pt
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	75.9 pt
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	67.2 pt
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	66.8 pt
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	65.7 pt
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	65.3 pt
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	64 pt
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	60.7 pt
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	58.2 pt
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	58.1 pt
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	57.7 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	54.3 pt
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	51 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	48.7 pt
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	43.6 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	37334 Points +107%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	28398 (19650.3^min - 28397.7^max) Points +58%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	20681 Points +15%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (15070 - 23576, n=9)	19726 Points +10%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	18903 Points +5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	17995 (17785.9^min - 17994.8^max) Points
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	16402 (16130.8^min - 16402.1^max) Points -9%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	16304 (16095.8^min - 16304.1^max) Points -9%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	16148 (15722.4^min - 16148.2^max) Points -10%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	15871 (15687.6^min - 15871.1^max) Points -12%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	15746 (15036.2^min - 15746.1^max) Points -12%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	15506 Points -14%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	14516 Points -19%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	13015 Points -28%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	10524 (10414.4^min - 10524.2^max) Points -42%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2105 Points +2%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (1979 - 2164, n=9)	2099 Points +1%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	2089 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	2080 Points 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2071 Points
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	2052 Points -1%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2025 Points -2%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	1957 Points -6%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1754 Points -15%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	1731 Points -16%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1721 Points -17%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	1718 Points -17%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1715 Points -17%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	1697 Points -18%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	1426 Points -31%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	14564 Points +108%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	10501 Points +50%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	8068 Points +15%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (5861 - 9208, n=9)	7677 Points +9%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	7378 Points +5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	7014 Points
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	6480 Points -8%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6293 Points -10%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	6255 Points -11%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	6235 Points -11%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	6117 Points -13%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	6051 Points -14%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	5617 Points -20%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	5013 Points -29%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	4121 Points -41%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	809 Points +2%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (761 - 830, n=9)	809 Points +2%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	801 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	798 Points +1%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	798 Points +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	793 Points
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	792 Points 0%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	741 Points -7%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	679 Points -14%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	677 Points -15%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	671 Points -15%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	660 Points -17%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	659 Points -17%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	622 Points -22%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	549 Points -31%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	5881 Points +127%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	4061 (2729.26^min - 4061.33^max) Points +56%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3137 Points +21%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (2280 - 3496, n=9)	3020 Points +16%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2860 Points +10%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2596 (2556.24^min - 2596.05^max) Points
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	2588 (2544.37^min - 2588.16^max) Points 0%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2585 (2069.54^min - 2584.65^max) Points 0%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	2514 (2493.14^min - 2513.98^max) Points -3%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	2413 (2374.03^min - 2412.84^max) Points -7%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	2383 (2314.15^min - 2382.8^max) Points -8%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	2370 Points -9%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	2260 Points -13%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2141 Points -18%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	1488 (1459.06^min - 1488.32^max) Points -43%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	317 Points +3%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	310 Points 0%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	309 Points 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	309 Points
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (288 - 322, n=9)	309 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	299 Points -3%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	297 Points -4%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	296 Points -4%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	276 Points -11%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	273 Points -12%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	266 Points -14%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	258 Points -17%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	248 Points -20%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	245 Points -21%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	204 Points -34%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	326 Seconds * -76%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	262 Seconds * -42%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	228 Seconds * -23%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	208 Seconds * -12%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	203 Seconds * -10%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	200 Seconds * -8%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	197 Seconds * -6%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	197 Seconds * -6%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	194 Seconds * -5%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (151 - 235, n=9)	187.9 Seconds * -2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	185 Seconds *
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	176 Seconds * +5%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	166 Seconds * +10%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	123 Seconds * +34%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	86 Seconds * +54%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	136872 MIPS +121%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	102982 MIPS +66%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	74358 MIPS +20%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	69787 MIPS +13%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	69688 MIPS +13%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	68893 MIPS +11%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	68394 MIPS +10%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	67869 MIPS +10%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	65478 MIPS +6%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (50116 - 71959, n=9)	62471 MIPS +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	61940 MIPS
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	52479 MIPS -15%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	50278 MIPS -19%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	34645 MIPS -44%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	0 MIPS -100%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	6845 MIPS +11%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	6516 MIPS +6%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	6515 MIPS +6%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	6497 MIPS +5%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6358 MIPS +3%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	6321 MIPS +3%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6310 MIPS +2%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	6261 MIPS +2%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	6237 MIPS +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	6164 MIPS
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (5403 - 6419, n=9)	6085 MIPS -1%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	6039 MIPS -2%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	5816 MIPS -6%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	5136 MIPS -17%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	4461 MIPS -28%

Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	22157 Points +45%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (15284 - 17992, n=12)	16370 Points +7%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	15339 Points 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	15284 Points
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	14220 Points -7%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	14072 Points -8%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	13345 Points -13%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	13309 Points -13%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	12825 Points -16%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	12685 Points -17%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	12515 Points -18%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	11749 Points -23%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	11358 Points -26%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	8964 Points -41%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	7103 Points -54%

Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	2929 Points +2%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2899 Points +1%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (2665 - 3110, n=12)	2890 Points 0%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	2883 Points 0%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2878 Points 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2878 Points
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	2876 Points 0%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	2748 Points -5%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2722 Points -5%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	2617 Points -9%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	2580 Points -10%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	2546 Points -12%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	2545 Points -12%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2316 Points -20%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	1849 Points -36%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	24593 Points +77%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (13140 - 17487, n=10)	15363 Points +10%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	15175 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	15052 Points +8%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	14211 Points +2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	13908 Points
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	12597 Points -9%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12244 Points -12%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	11980 Points -14%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	11614 Points -16%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	11604 Points -17%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	11283 Points -19%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10856 Points -22%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	7927 Points -43%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	7574 Points -46%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	2240 Points +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2111 Points
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2080 Points -1%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (1911 - 2256, n=10)	2071 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	2057 Points -3%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2024 Points -4%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	2022 Points -4%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	1996 Points -5%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1993 Points -6%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	1924 Points -9%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	1880 Points -11%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1841 Points -13%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	1810 Points -14%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1685 Points -20%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	1315 Points -38%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	40.3 fps +88%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	27.4 fps +28%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	23.6 fps +10%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (17.9 - 27.2, n=9)	22.8 fps +7%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	22.7 fps +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	21.4 fps
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	21.2 fps -1%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	20.4 fps -5%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	19.9 fps -7%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	19.8 fps -7%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	18.3 fps -14%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	15.7 fps -27%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	15.6 fps -27%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	14.1 fps -34%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	13.3 fps -38%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	61.2 s * -50%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	58.4 s * -43%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	56 s * -37%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	55.7 s * -37%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	54.3 s * -33%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	53.1 s * -30%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	51.4 s * -26%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	51 s * -25%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (39.7 - 54.3, n=9)	45.5 s * -12%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	45.1 s * -11%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	42.7 s * -5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	40.8 s *
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	39.4 s * +3%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	37.3 s * +9%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	33.1 s * +19%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK	0.653 sec * -49%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	0.503 sec * -15%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	0.4982 sec * -14%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	0.4587 sec * -5%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	0.4544 sec * -4%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	0.4505 sec * -3%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	0.4428 sec * -1%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4395 sec * -1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	0.4372 sec *
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (0.4079 - 0.4794, n=9)	0.4324 sec * +1%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	0.4293 sec * +2%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Core i9-13900HK	0.4119 sec * +6%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	0.4091 sec * +6%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700	0.3935 sec * +10%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	0.3927 sec * +10%

* ... mindre är bättre

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2596 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

193.2 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

309 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

7014 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

793 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2071 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

17995 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

124.8 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

1031 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

Performance rating
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	89.8 pt
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	89.3 pt
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	82.9 pt
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	80.6 pt
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	76 pt
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	70.7 pt
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	67.4 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	26520 KRay/s +40%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	26120 KRay/s +38%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	25404 KRay/s +34%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	24831 KRay/s +31%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	23041 KRay/s +22%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (15160 - 24612, n=9)	20081 KRay/s +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	18930 KRay/s

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	124326 Points +30%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	114534 Points +20%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	113423 Points +19%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	106590 Points +11%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	104302 Points +9%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (54365 - 129641, n=9)	98069 Points +3%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	95675 Points

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	5510 MB/s +25%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	5093 MB/s +16%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	4975 MB/s +13%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	4764 MB/s +8%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (3695 - 5879, n=9)	4647 MB/s +6%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	4604 MB/s +5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	4397 MB/s

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	151670 Points +183%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	119475 Points +123%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	115748 Points +116%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	111673 Points +109%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (53557 - 67157, n=9)	62714 Points +17%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	58606 Points +9%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	53557 Points

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	15218 Points +86%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	15211 Points +86%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	15123 Points +85%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	14626 Points +79%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	8187 Points
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (6921 - 9378, n=9)	8147 Points 0%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	8074 Points -1%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	60656 Points +20%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	60518 Points +20%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	60511 Points +20%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	57378 Points +14%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	56019 Points +11%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (40946 - 64632, n=9)	52816 Points +5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	50451 Points

AIDA64 / CPU AES
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	171350 MB/s +165%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	114494 MB/s +77%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	86090 MB/s +33%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	83999 MB/s +30%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (58110 - 117613, n=9)	76476 MB/s +18%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	72638 MB/s +12%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	64670 MB/s

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	1585 MB/s +50%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	1167 MB/s +10%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (574 - 1366, n=9)	1069 MB/s +1%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	1066 MB/s +1%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	1057 MB/s 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	1057 MB/s
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	1036 MB/s -2%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	14133 KRay/s +35%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	13941 KRay/s +33%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	13694 KRay/s +31%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	12713 KRay/s +22%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	12576 KRay/s +20%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (5509 - 13527, n=9)	10448 KRay/s 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	10447 KRay/s

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (49874 - 65229, n=9)	58083 MPixel/s +4%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	55590 MPixel/s
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	53330 MPixel/s -4%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	41649 MPixel/s -25%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	41567 MPixel/s -25%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	40115 MPixel/s -28%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	24892 MPixel/s -55%

Systemets prestanda

Performance rating
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	91.4 pt
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	87.1 pt
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	86 pt
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	84.6 pt
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	78.4 pt
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	74.3 pt
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	73.6 pt

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	8855 Points +18%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	7798 Points +4%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (7492 - 7873, n=6)	7708 Points +3%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	7492 Points
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	7377 Points -2%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	6959 Points -7%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	6907 Points -8%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	11997 Points +7%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	11218 Points
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	11061 Points -1%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (10307 - 11218, n=6)	10904 Points -3%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10502 Points -6%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10377 Points -7%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10307 Points -8%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	11342 Points +20%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10667 Points +13%
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	9919 Points +5%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (8818 - 10667, n=6)	9640 Points +2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	9444 Points
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	9440 Points 0%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	9325 Points -1%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	13849 Points +29%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (10773 - 12660, n=6)	11861 Points +10%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	11705 Points +9%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	10773 Points
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	9929 Points -8%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	9243 Points -14%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	9227 Points -14%

CrossMark / Overall
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	2085 Points
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1812 - 2227, n=6)	2051 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	2048 Points -2%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2000 Points -4%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1791 Points -14%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1769 Points -15%
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	1762 Points -15%

CrossMark / Productivity
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	2032 Points
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1693 - 2170, n=6)	1956 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	1937 Points -5%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1927 Points -5%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1733 Points -15%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1709 Points -16%
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	1672 Points -18%

CrossMark / Creativity
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (2125 - 2377, n=6)	2252 Points +2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	2216 Points
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	2192 Points -1%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2161 Points -2%
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	1934 Points -13%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1895 Points -14%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1887 Points -15%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	1972 Points +5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	1876 Points
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1375 - 2191, n=6)	1793 Points -4%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1772 Points -6%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1666 Points -11%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1617 Points -14%
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	1562 Points -17%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	350 Points 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	350 Points
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	342 Points -2%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (280 - 358, n=6)	327 Points -7%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	324 Points -7%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	300 Points -14%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	290 Points -17%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	321 Points
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (254 - 324, n=6)	302 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	300 Points -7%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	287 Points -11%
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	274 Points -15%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	245 Points -24%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	245 Points -24%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	577 ms * -34%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	566 ms * -32%
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	503 ms * -17%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	465 ms * -8%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	454 ms * -6%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (418 - 465, n=6)	439 ms * -2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	430 ms *

* ... mindre är bättre

PCMark 10 Score		7492 poäng
Hjälp

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (76816 - 109252, n=9)	92597 MB/s +15%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	80559 MB/s
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	79203 MB/s -2%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	74184 MB/s -8%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	69770 MB/s -13%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	67673 MB/s -16%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	40883 MB/s -49%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (75428 - 85799, n=9)	80578 MB/s +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	79808 MB/s
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	75428 MB/s -5%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	61614 MB/s -23%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	61129 MB/s -23%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	58305 MB/s -27%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	42927 MB/s -46%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	106026 MB/s +31%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	87234 MB/s +8%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	85497 MB/s +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	80726 MB/s
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	77625 MB/s -4%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (62446 - 82553, n=9)	75119 MB/s -7%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	37752 MB/s -53%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	128.3 ns * -18%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (108.4 - 136.7, n=9)	124.7 ns * -15%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	108.4 ns *
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	103.9 ns * +4%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	96.5 ns * +11%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	93.7 ns * +14%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060	84.1 ns * +22%

Geekbench AI / Quantized GPU 1.5
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	5954 Points +24%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	5370 Points +12%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	5244 Points +9%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (4803 - 5289, n=3)	5112 Points +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	4803 Points

Geekbench AI / Half Precision GPU 1.5
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	11903 Points +27%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	11370 Points +21%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	11120 Points +19%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (9377 - 11969, n=3)	11083 Points +18%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	9377 Points

Geekbench AI / Single Precision GPU 1.5
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	7966 Points +10%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	7892 Points +9%
Genomsnitt Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (7262 - 7954, n=3)	7703 Points +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	7262 Points
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	7193 Points -1%

* ... mindre är bättre

DPC-fördröjning

LatencyMon visar DPC-problem och två tappade bildrutor vid uppspelning av 4K60-video

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H	3050.8 μs *
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra GeForce RTX 4060, i7-14700	2421 μs * +21%
GMK NucBox K12 Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1124 μs * +63%
GMK EVO-T1 Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	978.6 μs * +68%
BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	843 μs * +72%
Beelink SER9 Pro Radeon 780M, Ryzen 7 H 255, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	790.7 μs * +74%

* ... mindre är bättre

Lagringsenheter

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6941 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4017 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 822.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 621.8 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 4642 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2894 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 89.42 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 288 MB/s

Drive Performance rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance rating - Percent
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	84.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	82.7 pt
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	70.3 pt
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	60.3 pt
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	50.9 pt
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	48.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	4684 (4668.68^min - 4684.06^max) MB/s
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3100 (3048.82^min - 3099.89^max) MB/s -34%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	2884 (2876.15^min - 2883.79^max) MB/s -38%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	2496 (2483.24^min - 2495.57^max) MB/s -47%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2149 (2136.58^min - 2148.64^max) MB/s -54%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2112 (2077.27^min - 2111.8^max) MB/s -55%
seq write
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4563 (4113.52^min - 4563.08^max) MB/s +70%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	4200 (4067.43^min - 4199.55^max) MB/s +57%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	3151 (2303.72^min - 3150.76^max) MB/s +18%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	2678 (1205.44^min - 2677.64^max) MB/s
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1810 (450.26^min - 1810.21^max) MB/s -32%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1808 (844.51^min - 1808.37^max) MB/s -32%
seq q8 t1 read
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	7027 (6531.58^min - 7026.93^max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	6130 (5491.32^min - 6129.98^max) MB/s -13%
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	5103 (4471.34^min - 5103.21^max) MB/s -27%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4942 (4516.62^min - 4941.52^max) MB/s -30%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4915 (4300^min - 4915.3^max) MB/s -30%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	4071 (3372.85^min - 4070.78^max) MB/s -42%
seq q8 t1 write
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	6409 (2562.3^min - 6408.9^max) MB/s
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4599 (4437.99^min - 4599.05^max) MB/s -28%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	4399 (4254.7^min - 4398.57^max) MB/s -31%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	3164 (3161.46^min - 3163.55^max) MB/s -51%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1803 (883.02^min - 1802.5^max) MB/s -72%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1799 (640.89^min - 1798.7^max) MB/s -72%
4k q1 t1 read
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	88.3 (87.81^min - 88.25^max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	80.2 (77.33^min - 80.16^max) MB/s -9%
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	77 (75.54^min - 77.03^max) MB/s -13%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	62.7 (61.92^min - 62.74^max) MB/s -29%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	54.4 (53.83^min - 54.44^max) MB/s -38%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	50.5 (49.98^min - 50.45^max) MB/s -43%
4k q1 t1 write
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	297 (295.94^min - 296.5^max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	269 (268.19^min - 268.71^max) MB/s -9%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	261 (259.05^min - 260.68^max) MB/s -12%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	254 (91.72^min - 253.66^max) MB/s -14%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	251 (216.59^min - 251.05^max) MB/s -15%
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	242 (231.04^min - 241.7^max) MB/s -19%
4k q32 t16 read
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	4349 (4343.6^min - 4349.02^max) MB/s
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3548 (3523.05^min - 3547.64^max) MB/s -18%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	3369 (3352.24^min - 3369.05^max) MB/s -23%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	784 (747.62^min - 783.51^max) MB/s -82%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	698 (696.34^min - 698.49^max) MB/s -84%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	696 (692.86^min - 696.3^max) MB/s -84%
4k q32 t16 write
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3304 (3139.17^min - 3304.42^max) MB/s +71%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	3032 (2937.1^min - 3032.48^max) MB/s +57%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	2706 (2653.27^min - 2705.82^max) MB/s +40%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	1937 (1313.65^min - 1936.81^max) MB/s
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1786 (636.51^min - 1786.33^max) MB/s -8%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1780 (805.06^min - 1780.2^max) MB/s -8%

AS SSD
Score Total
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	8193 Points +101%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	7758 Points +90%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	4816 Points +18%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	4085 Points
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3778 Points -8%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3482 Points -15%
Score Read
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	3042 Points +59%
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3001 Points +57%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	1915 Points
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	1142 Points -40%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1127 Points -41%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1095 Points -43%
Score Write
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3662 Points +179%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	3208 Points +144%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	3104 Points +136%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2146 Points +63%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1928 Points +47%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	1313 Points
Seq Read
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	5078.19 MB/s +33%
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4229 MB/s +11%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3916.9 MB/s +3%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3870.26 MB/s +2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	3811.12 MB/s
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	3358.16 MB/s -12%
Seq Write
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	4153.85 MB/s +323%
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3985 MB/s +306%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	2751.6 MB/s +181%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2185.55 MB/s +123%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1648.2 MB/s +68%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	980.9 MB/s
4K Read
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	84.6 MB/s +5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	80.76 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	67.29 MB/s -17%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	60.04 MB/s -26%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	52.09 MB/s -36%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	50 MB/s -38%
4K Write
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	263.64 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	229.1 MB/s -13%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	221.74 MB/s -16%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	219.87 MB/s -17%
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	211 MB/s -20%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	190.38 MB/s -28%
4K-64 Read
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2493 MB/s +72%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	2466.73 MB/s +70%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	1453.09 MB/s
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	745.77 MB/s -49%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	688.04 MB/s -53%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	653.44 MB/s -55%
4K-64 Write
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3052 MB/s +221%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	2606.88 MB/s +174%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	2563.51 MB/s +169%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1707.34 MB/s +79%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1572.62 MB/s +65%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	951.67 MB/s
Access Time Read
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.125 ms * -198%
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	0.101 ms * -140%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	0.073 ms * -74%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.049 ms * -17%
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.048 ms * -14%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	0.042 ms *
Access Time Write
GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.097 ms * -26%
Beelink SER9 Pro Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.088 ms * -14%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra	0.077 ms *
BOSGAME M2 Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0	0.052 ms * +32%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra	0.051 ms * +34%
GMK EVO-T1 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.019 ms * +75%

* ... mindre är bättre

Diskbegränsning: DiskSpd läsloop, ködjup 8

Beelink GTI15 Ultra ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4627 (4156.56-4864.26)

GMK NucBox K12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4584 (3983.12-4907.96)

GPU-prestanda

Arc 140T Arc 140T är ungefär 20 procent snabbare än Arc 140V som ofta finns på många nyare ultratunna bärbara datorer med Intel Lunar Lake eller upp till 2x snabbare än den åldrande Iris Graphics 96 EUs. Om du ställer in BIOS till Performance-läge ökar grafikprestandan med 10 till 15 procent baserat på vår tid med GMK EVO-T1.

Att generera 5 bilder lokalt genom Intel AI Playground och Dreamshaper 8 med uppmaningen "Goldfish" skulle ta cirka 49 sekunder.

3DMark Performance rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance rating - Percent
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Radeon 8060S, AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	100 pt
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, Intel Core i7-14700	92.7 pt
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	32.1 pt
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T	31.1 pt
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	30.1 pt
BOSGAME M2 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	29.9 pt
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	29.5 pt
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	27.8 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	27.8 pt
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	27.6 pt
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	27.5 pt
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	22 pt
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	18.6 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	16.8 pt
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	11.5 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Radeon 8060S, AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	46861 Points +351%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, Intel Core i7-14700	38495 Points +271%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	14935 Points +44%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	14312 Points +38%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	14274 Points +38%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	13430 Points +29%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	13279 Points +28%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	12626 Points +22%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (9684 - 14935, n=17)	12315 Points +19%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	11785 Points +14%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	10381 Points
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	7633 Points -26%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	7424 Points -28%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	7351 Points -29%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	6066 Points -42%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Radeon 8060S, AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	29755 Points +287%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, Intel Core i7-14700	28629 Points +272%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	8904 Points +16%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	8875 Points +15%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	8801 Points +14%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (5433 - 10742, n=17)	8654 Points +12%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	8630 Points +12%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	8408 Points +9%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	8386 Points +9%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	7900 Points +3%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	7696 Points
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	6624 Points -14%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	6209 Points -19%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	5812 Points -24%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	3817 Points -50%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Radeon 8060S, AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	11340 Points +242%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, Intel Core i7-14700	10656 Points +222%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3872 Points +17%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (2466 - 4387, n=17)	3713 Points +12%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3312 Points
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	3205 Points -3%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3167 Points -4%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3152 Points -5%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	3077 Points -7%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	2903 Points -12%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	2863 Points -14%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	2754 Points -17%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	1890 Points -43%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1690 Points -49%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	1067 Points -68%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Radeon 8060S, AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	11284 Points +205%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, Intel Core i7-14700	11097 Points +200%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	4301 Points +16%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (2769 - 4876, n=17)	4107 Points +11%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3705 Points
BOSGAME M2 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3541 Points -4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	3540 Points -4%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3520 Points -5%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	3436 Points -7%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	3256 Points -12%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	3215 Points -13%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	3053 Points -18%
Beelink GTI13 Ultra Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	2159 Points -42%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1926 Points -48%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	1216 Points -67%

3DMark Performance rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 Performance		11154 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		36240 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7198 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		3705 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, Intel Core i7-14700	24 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, Intel Core i7-14700	40 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	467 Seconds * -55%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	399 Seconds * -32%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (262 - 492, n=17)	351 Seconds * -16%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	346 Seconds * -15%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	335 Seconds * -11%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	324 Seconds * -7%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	315 Seconds * -4%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	314 Seconds * -4%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	302 Seconds *
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	269 Seconds * +11%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	268 Seconds * +11%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, Intel Core i7-14700	214 Seconds * +29%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Radeon 8060S, AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	132 Seconds * +56%
v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	278 Seconds * -64%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (147 - 396, n=5)	221 Seconds * -31%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	169 Seconds *
v4.3 Barbershop CPU
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	2741 Seconds * -83%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900HK	1779 Seconds * -19%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS	1698 Seconds * -13%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1355 - 1839, n=7)	1632 Seconds * -9%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	1557 Seconds * -4%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 H 255	1528 Seconds * -2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	1498 Seconds *
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Radeon 890M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1363 Seconds * +9%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	1355 Seconds * +10%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Radeon 8060S, AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395	686 Seconds * +54%
v4.3 Barbershop oneAPI
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V	914 Seconds * -36%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (588 - 1037, n=4)	807 Seconds * -20%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	672 Seconds *

* ... mindre är bättre

Performance rating - Percent
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	100 pt
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	32.3 pt
GMK EVO-T1 ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	30.6 pt
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	30.2 pt
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	30 pt
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	27.6 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	75.4 (62.9^min) fps +247%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	25.8 (21.9^min) fps +19%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	24.8 (21.5^min) fps +14%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	23.6 (19.9^min, 16.3^P1) fps +9%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	22.6 (18.8^min, 6.53^P1) fps +4%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	21.7 (18.6^min, 18^P1) fps

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	101.9 fps +303%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.6 fps +17%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	26.9 fps +6%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	26.7 fps +6%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	25.3 (21.5^min, 22.2^P0.1, 22.8^P1) fps 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	25.3 (23.1^min, 23.1^P0.1, 23.6^P1) fps

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	122 (4.68^min, 83.3^P1) fps +613%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	29.1 (7.19^min, 20.4^P1) fps +70%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.5 (6.6^min, 19.6^P1) fps +67%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	27.8 (3.22^min, 18.9^P1) fps +63%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	18.1 (7.49^min, 14.1^P1) fps +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	17.1 (9.05^min, 13.7^P1) fps

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	113.6 fps +318%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	31.7 fps +17%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	30.5 fps +12%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	30.1 fps +11%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	27.6 fps +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	27.2 fps

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	189.9 (54^min, 145.8^P1) fps +275%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	53.4 (33.1^min, 40.4^P1) fps +5%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	51.2 (27.3^min, 41.1^P1) fps +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	50.7 (38.7^min, 41^P1) fps
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	49.5 (33.1^min, 38.6^P1) fps -2%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	164.8 (140.8^min) fps +112%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	88.1 (78.3^min) fps +13%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	81.5 (71.5^min) fps +5%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	81.4 (52.3^min) fps +4%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	78.1 (66.9^min) fps 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	77.9 (46.9^min) fps

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	127.8 fps +261%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	42.9 fps +21%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	41.4 fps +17%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	38 fps +7%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	37 fps +5%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	35.4 fps

F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	270 (213^min, 163^P1) fps +242%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	86.4 (75^min, 67^P1) fps +10%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	85.4 (65^min, 63^P1) fps +8%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	85.3 (65^min, 62^P1) fps +8%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	83.6 (64^min, 53^P1) fps +6%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	83.4 (63^min, 42^P1) fps +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	78.9 (67^min, 65^P1) fps
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (53.5 - 86.5, n=12)	76.6 fps -3%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	72 (52^min, 30^P1) fps -9%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	66.2 (56^min, 54^P1) fps -16%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	40.4 (34^min, 33^P1) fps -49%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25.7 (21^min, 17^P1) fps -67%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	250 (214^min, 158^P1) fps +243%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	79 (69^min, 63^P1) fps +9%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	75.6 (53^min, 50^P1) fps +4%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	74.8 (54^min, 43^P1) fps +3%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	74.5 (52^min, 49^P1) fps +2%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	73.3 (48^min, 47^P1) fps +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	72.8 (63^min, 61^P1) fps
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (47.4 - 79, n=12)	69.8 fps -4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	57.6 (47^min, 46^P1) fps -21%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	35.4 (30^min, 29^P1) fps -51%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	23.8 (19^min, 16^P1) fps -67%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	191.2 (166^min, 124^P1) fps +255%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	59.6 (53^min, 51^P1) fps +11%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	56.2 (38^min, 31^P1) fps +4%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	55.8 (41^min, 40^P1) fps +4%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	55.4 (38^min, 30^P1) fps +3%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	54.2 (37^min, 43^P1) fps +1%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (37.5 - 59.6, n=11)	54.1 fps +1%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	53.8 (38^min, 22^P1) fps 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	53.8 (46^min, 46^P1) fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	43.4 (34^min, 35^P1) fps -19%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25.6 (22^min, 21^P1) fps -52%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	18 (14^min, 12^P1) fps -67%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	58.5 (42^min, 28^P1) fps +242%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	20.4 (17^min, 16^P1) fps +19%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	19.5 (16^min, 16^P1) fps +14%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (16.4 - 19.9, n=9)	18.3 fps +7%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	17.1 (14^min, 14^P1) fps
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	16.6 (10^min, 7^P1) fps -3%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14.8 (10^min, 10^P1) fps -13%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	13.9 (4^min, 7^P1) fps -19%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	13.6 (8^min, 8^P1) fps -20%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	13 (5^min, 9^P1) fps -24%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	12.3 (1^min, 3^P1) fps -28%

Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:SM
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	138.8 (29.8^min, 89.1^P0.1, 97.3^P1) fps +284%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	137.4 fps +281%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	48.7 (36^min, 36.2^P0.1, 43.4^P1) fps +35%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	44.1 fps +22%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	42.4 (27.8^min, 28^P0.1, 34.4^P1) fps +17%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	40.8 fps +13%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	39.9 fps +11%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	39.8 (32.3^min, 33^P0.1, 34.1^P1) fps +10%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (25.6 - 42.4, n=16)	36.7 fps +2%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	36.1 fps 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	36.1 (32.2^min, 32.3^P0.1, 33.8^P1) fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	33.5 (20.9^min, 21^P0.1, 23.4^P1) fps -7%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	18 (5.95^min, 5.96^P0.1, 6.91^P1) fps -50%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	12.9 fps -64%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	117.4 fps +293%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	114.8 (60.2^min, 74.7^P0.1, 89.4^P1) fps +284%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	37.8 (31^min, 31.4^P0.1, 34.6^P1) fps +26%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	36.5 fps +22%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	33.5 fps +12%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	33.4 (23^min, 24.1^P0.1, 30.7^P1) fps +12%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	32.9 fps +10%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	30.5 (25.8^min, 26^P0.1, 27^P1) fps +2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	29.9 (27.2^min, 27.3^P0.1, 27.7^P1) fps
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	29.5 fps -1%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (20.3 - 33.3, n=16)	29 fps -3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	25.9 (5.81^min, 8.8^P0.1, 15.9^P1) fps -13%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14 (4.57^min, 4.59^P0.1, 5.02^P1) fps -53%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.7 fps -64%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	103.4 fps +302%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	101.4 (13.6^min, 61.8^P0.1, 83.5^P1) fps +295%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	31.6 (24.8^min, 24.8^P0.1, 27.5^P1) fps +23%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	30.6 fps +19%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	29 fps +13%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	27.1 fps +5%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	27 fps +5%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	26.6 (15.7^min, 15.8^P0.1, 16.8^P1) fps +4%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	26.1 (22.3^min, 22.3^P0.1, 23.4^P1) fps +2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	25.7 (23.3^min, 23.5^P0.1, 23.8^P1) fps
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (17.6 - 28.3, n=16)	25 fps -3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	22.4 (14^min, 14.2^P0.1, 15.3^P1) fps -13%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	11.7 (3.43^min, 3.51^P0.1, 3.99^P1) fps -54%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	9.2 fps -64%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	101.9 fps +303%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	98.6 (61.2^min, 74.7^P0.1, 81.5^P1) fps +290%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.6 fps +17%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	26.9 fps +6%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	26.7 fps +6%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	26.7 fps +6%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	26.2 (15.8^min, 15.9^P0.1, 16.4^P1) fps +4%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	25.3 (21.5^min, 22.2^P0.1, 22.8^P1) fps 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	25.3 (23.1^min, 23.1^P0.1, 23.6^P1) fps
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (17.2 - 27.8, n=17)	24.3 fps -4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	21.5 (13.6^min, 13.7^P0.1, 14.1^P1) fps -15%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	19.7 (15.9^min, 16^P0.1, 16.3^P1) fps -22%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	11.2 (3.28^min, 3.43^P0.1, 4.16^P1) fps -56%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	9.2 fps -64%

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off)
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	169.6 (133.7^min) fps +221%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	148.5 (125.5^min) fps +181%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	84.9 (70.7^min, 67.3^P1) fps +60%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	77.9 (64.8^min) fps +47%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	73.6 (61^min, 58^P1) fps +39%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	72.2 (60.8^min, 57.6^P1) fps +36%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	62.5 (32.9^min, 26.7^P1) fps +18%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	57.2 (48.1^min) fps +8%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	52.9 (45.1^min, 43.5^P1) fps
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (27.5 - 57.2, n=9)	48.1 fps -9%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	46.3 (39.2^min) fps -12%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	31.3 (24.7^min) fps -41%
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	134.7 (114.5^min) fps +299%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	133.9 (108.2^min) fps +296%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	51.4 (43.9^min, 41.5^P1) fps +52%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	46.3 (39.5^min) fps +37%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	44.5 (37.8^min, 36.5^P1) fps +32%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	43.6 (37.4^min, 36.1^P1) fps +29%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	43.5 (37.6^min, 35.5^P1) fps +29%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	38.8 (34.1^min) fps +15%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (24.8 - 42.3, n=16)	36.3 fps +7%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	33.9 (19.2^min, 16.7^P1) fps 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	33.8 (29.3^min, 28.4^P1) fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	30.1 (25.8^min) fps -11%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	18.2 (14.7^min) fps -46%
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	119 (97.6^min) fps +346%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	106 (92.2^min) fps +297%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	40.2 (34.9^min, 33.1^P1) fps +51%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	36.3 (31.7^min) fps +36%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	34.3 (30.1^min, 28.2^P1) fps +28%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	33.9 (29.5^min, 20.2^P1) fps +27%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	33.4 (28.9^min, 16.5^P1) fps +25%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	31.4 (27.4^min) fps +18%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (21.8 - 35.1, n=14)	30 fps +12%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	26.7 (23.2^min, 22.4^P1) fps
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	26.6 (15.5^min, 13.9^P1) fps 0%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	25.2 (22.3^min) fps -6%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14.7 (12.5^min) fps -45%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	97.9 (80.3^min) fps +311%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	89.5 (77.5^min) fps +276%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	29.4 (21.6^min, 18^P1) fps +24%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.2 (25.2^min) fps +23%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	27.1 (23.1^min, 20.3^P1) fps +14%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	26.7 (23.2^min) fps +12%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	26.5 (22.1^min, 14.5^P1) fps +11%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	26.4 (22.9^min, 7.08^P1) fps +11%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (17 - 30, n=15)	25.6 fps +8%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	23.8 (20.3^min, 19.7^P1) fps
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	23.2 (12.6^min, 11.3^P1) fps -3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	21.7 (18.8^min) fps -9%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	12.8 (10.9^min) fps -46%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	87.3 (70^min) fps +302%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	75.4 (62.9^min) fps +247%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	25.8 (21.9^min) fps +19%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	24.8 (21.5^min) fps +14%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	23.6 (19.9^min, 16.3^P1) fps +9%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (15.4 - 27.3, n=17)	23.1 fps +6%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	22.6 (18.8^min, 6.53^P1) fps +4%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	21.8 (14.4^min, 12.2^P1) fps 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	21.7 (18.6^min, 18^P1) fps
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	21.5 (15.5^min, 12.7^P1) fps -1%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	19.6 (16.7^min) fps -10%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	19.4 (11^min, 10.1^P1) fps -11%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	11.5 (9.81^min) fps -47%

Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	180.4 (154^min) fps +118%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	166 (142.2^min) fps +101%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	98.4 (87.5^min) fps +19%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	95.6 (85^min) fps +16%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	93.2 (82^min) fps +13%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	93 (82.4^min) fps +13%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	90 (79^min) fps +9%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	84.8 (52.1^min) fps +3%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	82.6 (47.5^min) fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	75.9 (45.7^min) fps -8%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (49.7 - 91.1, n=18)	71.5 fps -13%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	65.5 (56.1^min) fps -21%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	59.9 (22.6^min) fps -27%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	46.1 (32.6^min) fps -44%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	164.8 (140.8^min) fps +112%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	144.5 (122.7^min) fps +85%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	89.7 (77.1^min) fps +15%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	88.1 (78.3^min) fps +13%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	82.8 (72^min) fps +6%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	81.5 (71.5^min) fps +5%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	81.4 (52.3^min) fps +4%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	78.1 (66.9^min) fps 0%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	77.9 (46.9^min) fps
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (51.5 - 94.9, n=18)	75.2 fps -3%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	72.9 (47.2^min) fps -6%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	65.8 (32.9^min) fps -16%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	58.6 (51.6^min) fps -25%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	44 (33.4^min) fps -44%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	223 fps +201%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	198.3 fps +167%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	84.9 fps +14%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	83.8 fps +13%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	81.8 fps +10%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	78.4 fps +6%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (47 - 95.1, n=17)	76.7 fps +3%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	74.2 fps
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	72.7 fps -2%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	71.3 fps -4%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	71.2 fps -4%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	60.6 fps -18%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	45.1 fps -39%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	30.2 fps -59%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	157.7 fps +305%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	126.2 fps +224%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	44.3 fps +14%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (25.4 - 47.9, n=17)	42.4 fps +9%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	42.3 fps +9%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	41.5 fps +7%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	39.1 fps +1%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	39.1 fps +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	38.9 fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	35.4 fps -9%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	34.3 fps -12%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	33.4 fps -14%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25.3 fps -35%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14.9 fps -62%
1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	113.6 fps +318%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	94.7 fps +248%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	31.7 fps +17%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	30.5 fps +12%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	30.1 fps +11%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (19.5 - 33.1, n=17)	29 fps +7%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	28.7 fps +6%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	27.6 fps +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	27.2 fps
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	25.8 fps -5%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	25.3 fps -7%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	24.1 fps -11%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	18.2 fps -33%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.7 fps -61%

GTA V
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	184.7 (2.08^min, 142.9^P1) fps +38%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	181.9 (3.06^min, 125^P1) fps +36%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	151.4 (4.93^min, 100^P1) fps +13%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	145 (4.16^min, 58.8^P1) fps +9%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	133.4 (6.17^min, 90.9^P1) fps
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	133.2 (8.14^min, 83.3^P1) fps 0%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	131.5 (23^min, 83.3^P1) fps -1%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	131 (24.6^min, 83.3^P1) fps -2%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	130 (26^min, 83.3^P1) fps -3%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	127.5 (23^min, 76.9^P1) fps -4%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (111.1 - 137.8, n=9)	123.3 fps -8%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	117.6 (36.7^min, 83.3^P1) fps -12%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	78.7 (14^min, 43.5^P1) fps -41%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	40.6 (15^min, 20^P1) fps -70%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	182.5 (2.13^min, 125^P1) fps +346%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	173.6 (4.5^min, 125^P1) fps +324%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	76 (9.03^min, 52.6^P1) fps +86%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	69.4 (11.3^min, 47.6^P1) fps +70%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	69.4 (9.45^min, 47.6^P1) fps +70%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	65.3 (8.95^min, 45.5^P1) fps +60%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	65 (10.7^min, 45.5^P1) fps +59%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	63.6 (8.99^min, 25.6^P1) fps +56%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	44.2 (13.2^min, 33.3^P1) fps +8%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	40.9 (6.4^min, 33.3^P1) fps
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (25.5 - 46.9, n=15)	40.3 fps -1%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	39.9 (3.1^min, 29.4^P1) fps -2%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	22 (6.3^min, 16.4^P1) fps -46%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	11.7 (5.5^min, 7.25^P1) fps -71%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	122 (4.68^min, 83.3^P1) fps +613%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	99.8 (9.41^min, 71.4^P1) fps +484%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	31.4 (5.99^min, 22.7^P1) fps +84%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	29.1 (7.19^min, 20.4^P1) fps +70%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.5 (6.6^min, 19.6^P1) fps +67%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.1 (3.37^min, 19.2^P1) fps +64%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	27.8 (3.22^min, 18.9^P1) fps +63%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	26.6 (9.34^min, 11.4^P1) fps +56%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	18.1 (7.49^min, 14.1^P1) fps +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	17.1 (9.05^min, 13.7^P1) fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	16.6 (2.85^min, 11.4^P1) fps -3%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (10.4 - 18.1, n=16)	16.5 fps -4%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	9.07 (3.84^min, 7.35^P1) fps -47%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	4.79 (3.09^min, 3.5^P1) fps -72%

Strange Brigade
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	265 (170.8^min, 230^P1) fps +263%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (36 - 92.1, n=13)	78 fps +7%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	75.2 (60.2^min, 63^P1) fps +3%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	73.7 (60.8^min, 62.9^P1) fps +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	73.1 (60.1^min, 63.9^P1) fps
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	71.8 (20.2^min, 27^P1) fps -2%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	70.4 (17.6^min, 61.6^P1) fps -4%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	67.8 (55.4^min, 59.2^P1) fps -7%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	67.1 (46.5^min, 58.3^P1) fps -8%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	42.5 (5.6^min, 23.9^P1) fps -42%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	23.4 (8.3^min, 10.4^P1) fps -68%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	229 (19.8^min, 166.6^P1) fps +276%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	214 (123.6^min, 163.3^P1) fps +251%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (32.1 - 76.5, n=13)	65.4 fps +7%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	63.6 (45.3^min, 48.8^P1) fps +4%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	62.6 (43.8^min, 48.8^P1) fps +3%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	60.9 (45.8^min, 48.3^P1) fps
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	59.7 (25.1^min, 46.7^P1) fps -2%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	59.7 (18.9^min, 25.9^P1) fps -2%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	56.9 (38.4^min, 44.9^P1) fps -7%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	56.5 (42.4^min, 43.8^P1) fps -7%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	33.8 (7^min, 18.3^P1) fps -44%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	20.1 (5^min, 7.35^P1) fps -67%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	196.8 (14.6^min, 143.5^P1) fps +288%
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	189.9 (54^min, 145.8^P1) fps +275%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	57.3 (18^min, 27.8^P1) fps +13%
Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M	54.2 (39^min, 42.8^P1) fps +7%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (30.8 - 63.1, n=14)	53.9 fps +6%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	53.4 (33.1^min, 40.4^P1) fps +5%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	51.2 (27.3^min, 41.1^P1) fps +1%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	50.7 (38.7^min, 41^P1) fps
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	49.5 (33.1^min, 38.6^P1) fps -2%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	48.7 (35^min, 38.6^P1) fps -4%
Geekom GT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	26.9 (5.4^min, 7.47^P1) fps -47%
Beelink SEi13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900HK, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17 (5^min, 5^P1) fps -66%

X-Plane 11.11
1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	187.6 fps +240%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	125 fps +126%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	66.1 fps +20%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	64.5 fps +17%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	63.5 fps +15%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	61.1 fps +11%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	60.3 fps +9%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (51.5 - 73.4, n=18)	58.4 fps +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	55.2 fps
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	51.8 fps -6%
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	47.5 fps -14%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	161.1 fps +311%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	85.8 fps +119%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	53.1 fps +35%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49.1 fps +25%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (39.2 - 57.7, n=18)	47.2 fps +20%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	45.7 fps +17%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	45.3 fps +16%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	44.5 fps +14%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	41.7 fps +6%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	39.2 fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	38.5 fps -2%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	127.8 fps +261%
Minisforum MS-S1 Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S	69 fps +95%
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	42.9 fps +21%
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M	41.4 fps +17%
Geekom A8, R7 8745HS AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS, AMD Radeon 780M	39.6 fps +12%
Genomsnitt Intel Arc Graphics 140T (33.2 - 49.2, n=18)	39.1 fps +10%
GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	38 fps +7%
Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255, AMD Radeon 780M	37 fps +5%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V	36 fps +2%
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T	35.4 fps
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	32.9 fps -7%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS-diagram

Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T: Ø21.6 (20.8-21.9)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra
GTA V (2015)	178.3	169.3	40.9	17.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	109.7	100.4	82.6	77.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	74.2	38.9	27.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	55.2	39.2	35.4
Strange Brigade (2018)	178.7	73.1	60.9	50.7
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	36.1	29.9	25.7	25.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)	33.8	26.7	23.8	21.7
F1 24 (2024)	78.9	72.8	53.8	17.1

Utsläpp

Systembuller

Fläktljudet toppar i det låga 30 dB(A)-området när man kör krävande belastningar, inklusive spel, vilket är tystare än många andra minidatorer som drivs av processorer i H-serien. Tänk dock på att detta lätt kan stiga till närmare 40 dB(A) när du ställer in systemet på prestandaläge via BIOS.

Fläktens ljudprofil (Vit: Bakgrund, Röd: System i viloläge, Blå: 3DMark 06, Orange: Cyberpunk 2077, Grön: Prime95+FurMark stress)

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		27.9 / 27.9 / 30.2 dB(A)
Hög belastning		31.3 / 32.5 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) omgivningsljud: 22.4 dB(A)

	Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	Beelink SER9 Pro Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	GMK NucBox K12 Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M	GMK EVO-T1 Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	BOSGAME M2 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060
Noise		-6%	-25%	-43%	-19%	-18%
av / miljö * (dB)	22.4	23 -3%	23.5 -5%	24.7 -10%	23 -3%	23.9 -7%
Idle Minimum * (dB)	27.9	29.1 -4%	35.4 -27%	38.7 -39%	31.5 -13%	28.2 -1%
Idle Average * (dB)	27.9	30.1 -8%	35.4 -27%	38.8 -39%	32.3 -16%	28.2 -1%
Idle Maximum * (dB)	30.2	31.7 -5%	39 -29%	38.9 -29%	34.9 -16%	32.5 -8%
Load Average * (dB)	31.3	33.7 -8%	42.4 -35%	51.6 -65%	39 -25%	32 -2%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)	32.1	33.8 -5%	40.4 -26%	52 -62%	40.3 -26%	48.4 -51%
Load Maximum * (dB)	32.5	35.2 -8%	41.4 -27%	51.6 -59%	42.5 -31%	50.9 -57%
Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)				38.7

* ... mindre är bättre

Temperatur

Stresstest

Processorn stabiliserades på 2,5 GHz, 68 C och 54 W när Prime95-stress kördes i balanserat läge jämfört med 3,4 GHz, 84 C och 76 W på GMK EVO-T1 i prestandaläge.

	Genomsnittlig CPU-klocka (GHz)	GPU-klocka (MHz)	Genomsnittlig CPU-temperatur (°C)
System i viloläge	--	--	55
Prime95 Stress	2.5	--	68
Prime95 + FurMark Stress	2.3	850	68
Cyberpunk 2077 Stress	1.0	1700 - 2350	63

Högtalare

De integrerade högtalarna fungerar bra tillsammans med de integrerade fyrdubbla mikrofonerna för röstaktiverade åtgärder. Medan andra minidatorer kanske bara har en enda mikrofon eller ingen alls, gör båda Beelink mer tillgänglig för Co-Pilot, ChatGPT, Alexa och annan röstaktiverad programvara.

Tyvärr toppar högtalarna på cirka 75 dB(A), vilket är bra för sovrum men annars på den tysta sidan för vardagsrum eller konferensrum där omgivande ljud är vanligt. Vår testenhet hade till exempel inga problem med att plocka upp våra röstkommandon för Alexa, men högtalarna saknar oomph under uppspelning. Högtalarna på den HP OmniBook 5 14toppar till exempel på nästan 93 dB(A) i jämförelse.

Rosa brus visar maximal volym kunde ha varit högre med endast 75 dB(A)

Frekvensdiagram (kryssrutor kan markeras och avmarkeras för att jämföra enheter)

Beelink GTI15 Ultra ljudanalys

(±) | högtalarljudstyrkan är genomsnittlig men bra (75.7 dB)
Bas 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reducerad bas - i genomsnitt 14.6% lägre än medianen
(-) | basen är inte linjär (15.9% delta till föregående frekvens)
Mellan 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | högre mellan - i genomsnitt 7% högre än median
(±) | linjäriteten för mids är genomsnittlig (7.9% delta till föregående frekvens)
Högsta 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanserade toppar - endast 2.6% från medianen
(±) | linjäriteten för toppar är genomsnittlig (7.7% delta till föregående frekvens)
Totalt 100 - 16 000 Hz
(±) | linjäriteten för det totala ljudet är genomsnittlig (21.3% skillnad mot median)
Jämfört med samma klass
» 44% av alla testade enheter i den här klassen var bättre, 16% liknande, 40% sämre
» Den bästa hade ett delta på 13%, genomsnittet var 25%, sämst var 64%
Jämfört med alla testade enheter
» 58% av alla testade enheter var bättre, 7% liknande, 34% sämre
» Den bästa hade ett delta på 4%, genomsnittet var 24%, sämst var 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro ljudanalys

(+) | högtalare kan spela relativt högt (84.7 dB)
Bas 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | bra bas - bara 3.8% från medianen
(+) | basen är linjär (5.2% delta till föregående frekvens)
Mellan 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanserad mellan - endast 1.3% från medianen
(+) | mids är linjära (2.1% delta till föregående frekvens)
Högsta 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanserade toppar - endast 1.9% från medianen
(+) | toppar är linjära (2.7% delta till föregående frekvens)
Totalt 100 - 16 000 Hz
(+) | det totala ljudet är linjärt (4.6% skillnad mot median)
Jämfört med samma klass
» 0% av alla testade enheter i den här klassen var bättre, 0% liknande, 100% sämre
» Den bästa hade ett delta på 5%, genomsnittet var 17%, sämst var 45%
Jämfört med alla testade enheter
» 0% av alla testade enheter var bättre, 0% liknande, 100% sämre
» Den bästa hade ett delta på 4%, genomsnittet var 24%, sämst var 134%

Energiförvaltning

Strömförbrukning

Förbrukningen är ovanligt hög vid tomgångskörning på skrivbordet, även efter kontroll av bakgrundsaktivitet eller smygprogram. Den höga förbrukningen uppträder även i viloläge, vilket tyder på ett potentiellt fel i CPU-strömtillståndet. Det är annars där vi förväntar oss att det ska vara när vi kör mer krävande belastningar. Systemet är mindre krävande än den AMD-drivna GMK NucBox K12 samtidigt som det erbjuder något snabbare prestanda för bättre prestanda per watt.

Förbrukningen ökade till 84 W när Prime95-stress startades

Prime95+FurMark stress initierad vid 10 sekunders markering

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	4.4 / 32.9 Watt
Låg belastning	18.8 / 20.1 / 40.1 Watt
Hög belastning	66.2 / 82.4 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T, , , x,	Beelink SER9 Pro Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x,	GMK NucBox K12 Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x,	GMK EVO-T1 Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x,	BOSGAME M2 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0, , x,	Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060, , , x,
Power Consumption		34%	21%	28%	27%	-127%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	18.8	7 63%	9.9 47%	6.1 68%	6.4 66%	26.5 -41%
Idle Average * (Watt)	20.1	7.1 65%	10.1 50%	7.9 61%	7.3 64%	33.2 -65%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	40.1	7.5 81%	13.1 67%	13.2 67%	7.5 81%	33.9 15%
Load Average * (Watt)	66.2	62.3 6%	69.8 -5%	60.7 8%	75 -13%	127.6 -93%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)	72.4	80.1 -11%	86.3 -19%	67.4 7%	83 -15%	291 -302%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	82.4	82.9 -1%	92.8 -13%	117.1 -42%	99.9 -21%	307.8 -274%

* ... mindre är bättre

Strömförbrukning Cyberpunk / Stresstest

Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T: Ø83.1 (81.8-83.7)

GMK NucBox K12 Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M: Ø91.4 (89.7-92.8)

Strömförbrukning extern monitor

Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø82.9 (81.9-83.9)

GMK NucBox K12 Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø89 (87.7-90.4)

Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø77.8 (74.2-78.5)

GMK NucBox K12 Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø81.4 (80.4-82.7)

Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø76.7 (74.7-78.3)

Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø61.7 (60.7-67.9)

GMK NucBox K12 Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø85.1 (80-87.5)

Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø18.6 (17.4-20)

GMK NucBox K12 Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10 (9.29-14.6)

Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø72.4 (71.2-73.8)

GMK NucBox K12 Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø86.3 (78.2-87.4)

Notebookcheck Betyg

!CHANGE!

mycket kort avslutning, max 400 tecken

Tillbaka till domen

Beelink GTI15 Ultra - 11/29/2025 v8
Allen Ngo

Design

87 / 98 → 89%

Anslutningar

70 / 81 → 87%

Vikt

71%

Spelprestanda

51 / 80 → 64%

Programprestanda

89 / 92 → 97%

AI Performance

89%

Temperatur

96%

Ljudnivå

87%

Audio

64%

Medel

55%

84%

Mini PC - Vägt medel

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
32.9%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 24.2%

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Bild	Modell / recensioner	Pris	Vikt	Höjd	Skärm
1. 83.7%	Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 64 GB Minne	Amazon: $1,229.00 Listpris: 1200 USD	1.3 kg	55.8 mm	x
2. 80.2%	Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Minne, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: Listpris: 520 USD	812 g	44.7 mm	x
3. 73.7%	GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Minne, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: $749.99	938 g	78 mm	x
4. 75.4%	GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 64 GB Minne, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: $1,299.99 Listpris: 999€	946 g	73.6 mm	x
5. 79%	BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Minne, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: Listpris: 600 USD	819 g	51 mm	x
6. 76.9%	Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ⎘ 32 GB Minne	Amazon: 1. $779.00 Lenovo ThinKCentre neo 50q G... 2. $599.00 Lenovo ThinkCentre neo 50q G... 3. $649.99 Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo 30s G... Listpris: 1600 USD	3.5 kg	108 mm	x

Fler artiklar relaterade till den här enheten

Beelink GTI15 Ultra (GTI Serie)

Test

•

Recension av Beelink GTI13 Ultra mini PC: Ett Mac Mini-alternativ med Intel...

Test

•

Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station mini PC recension: Mer prisvärd än v...

Test

•

Vårt bästa alternativ till Intel NUC 11 - Recension av Beelink GTI 11 mini PC

Genomskinlighet

Valet av enheter som ska granskas görs av vår redaktion. Testprovet gavs till författaren som ett lån av tillverkaren eller återförsäljaren för denna recension. Långivaren hade inget inflytande på denna recension och inte heller fick tillverkaren en kopia av denna recension innan publiceringen. Det fanns ingen skyldighet att publicera denna recension. Som ett oberoende medieföretag är Notebookcheck inte föremål för auktoritet från tillverkare, återförsäljare eller förlag.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity.

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5435 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 666018 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Beelink GTI15 Ultra recension: En av de mest fullfjädrade minidatorerna för storleken

Allen Ngo, 2025-11-30 (Update: 2025-11-30)

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core jämför
Asus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min) N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs	91
...
Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1024
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1027
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	1029
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	1031
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-78-100,	1033
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T	1053
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, M3 Pro 18-Core GPU	1059
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 jämför
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex-1570 81CA000RUS (min) i5-8550U, GeForce MX130	28
...
Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11139
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M	11140
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	11153
Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T	11154
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	11161
Dell XPS 13 9350 Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V	11161
MSI GT72-2QE32SR311BW 4710HQ, GeForce GTX 980M	11173
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (max) R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 5090	82642