Notebookcheck

Test: Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro - Flaggskeppsprestanda till mittenskiktspris (Sammanfattning)

Årets flaggskeppsdödare 2021? Det finns knappt någon annan smartphone som har så bra tekniska egenskaper som Redmi K40 Pro: 120 Hz AMOLED-skärm på 1.300 nits, Snapdragon 888, UFS 3.1-lagring samt WiFi 6E för under 5.000 kronor. Men det finns en hake med Xiaomis telefon...
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro (Redmi K40 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 660
Minne
8192 MB 
Skärm
6.67 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 395 PPI, Tryckkänslig, Kapacitiv, Super AMOLED, 360 Hz touchfrekvens, glansig: ja, HDR, 120 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 106 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: USB Typ-C, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhet, Kompass, Färgspektrum, Barometer, OTG, IR-sändare, Miracast
Nätverk
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 5G: n1 / n3 / n28A / n41 / n77 / n78, 4G: FDD-LTE: B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B26 / B28A, TDD-LTE: B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 / B42, 3G: B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19; 2G: 850/900/1800 /1900MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.8 x 163.7 x 76.4
Batteri
4520 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/1.9, 26mm, 1/1.7", 0.8µm) + 8 MP (f/2.2, ultravid) + 5 MP (f/2.4, 50mm, 1/5.0", 1.12µm, makro)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.5, 1/3.4", 0.8µm)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Dubbla, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Hölje, Laddare, USB-kabel, MiUI 12.5, 12 Månader Garanti, Widevine L1, Camera2 API: Level 3, GNSS: GPS, Galileo, GLONASS, BeiDou, fanless
Vikt
196 g, Strömförsörjning: 95 g
Pris
480 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
sökrelation
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87 %
05/2021
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
196 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
83 %
04/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
81 %
05/2021
Nokia X20
SD 480, Adreno 619
220 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
86 %
05/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
SD 780G 5G, Adreno 642
159 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
85 %
05/2021
Motorola Moto G100
SD 870, Adreno 650
207 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2520x1080
Recension av Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Recension av Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro

Storleksjämförelse

168.4 mm 74 mm 9.7 mm 207 g168.9 mm 79.7 mm 9.1 mm 220 g163.7 mm 76.4 mm 7.8 mm 196 g159.9 mm 75.1 mm 8.4 mm 189 g160.53 mm 75.72 mm 6.81 mm 159 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
891 (847min - 921max) MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
876 (839min - 921max) MBit/s ∼98%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 (643min - 704max) MBit/s ∼78% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=296, last 2 years)
398 MBit/s ∼45% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (275min - 287max) MBit/s ∼32% -68%
Nokia X20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
222 (126min - 326max) MBit/s ∼25% -75%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
874 (833min - 900max) MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
829 (391min - 881max) MBit/s ∼95%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
788 (733min - 833max) MBit/s ∼90% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=296, last 2 years)
405 MBit/s ∼46% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
331 (322min - 337max) MBit/s ∼38% -60%
Nokia X20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
313 (190min - 343max) MBit/s ∼36% -62%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900391793782783795785793808795824820816836823844879871848843866856835839837865881840833866833391793782783795785793808795824820816836823844879871848843866856835839837865881840833866833854870870860875881866880891900877895858863872851839882881877888881921892893890877873861850Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø816 (391-881)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø876 (839-921)
Navigering: Redmi K40 Pro vs. Garmin Edge 500
Navigering: Redmi K40 Pro vs. Garmin Edge 500
Navigering: Redmi K40 Pro vs. Garmin Edge 500
Navigering: Redmi K40 Pro vs. Garmin Edge 500
Navigering: Redmi K40 Pro vs. Garmin Edge 500
Navigering: Redmi K40 Pro vs. Garmin Edge 500
Ultra-vidvinkel
Ultra-vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
10x zoom (max)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angleWide angleLow Light5x-ZoomUltra wide angle
click to load images
ColorChecker
17.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro: 9.54 ∆E min: 3.16 - max: 23.37 ∆E
ColorChecker
27.1 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
35 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
53.2 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
27.5 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
56.4 ∆E
25 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
56.1 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
38.1 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
53.4 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
34.6 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro: 37.93 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 56.44 ∆E
854
cd/m²
863
cd/m²
872
cd/m²
861
cd/m²
864
cd/m²
881
cd/m²
863
cd/m²
868
cd/m²
875
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Max: 881 cd/m² Medel: 866.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.56 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 97 %
Mitt på batteriet: 864 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
97.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.18
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Nokia X20
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Motorola Moto G100
IPS/LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.70
Screen
-85%
-217%
-102%
-203%
Brightness middle
864
744
-14%
646
-25%
863
0%
562
-35%
Brightness
867
749
-14%
617
-29%
860
-1%
535
-38%
Brightness Distribution
97
98
1%
89
-8%
93
-4%
90
-7%
Black Level *
0.7
0.57
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1
2.2
-120%
5.71
-471%
3.2
-220%
3.99
-299%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
1.7
7
-312%
8.9
-424%
5.2
-206%
9.74
-473%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.4
2.1
-50%
6.2
-343%
3.9
-179%
6.5
-364%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.06 107%
2.122 104%
2.33 94%
2.174 101%
CCT
6346 102%
6516 100%
8256 79%
7299 89%
6882 94%
Contrast
923
986

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 495 Hz ≤ 66 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 495 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 66 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 495 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9713 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.3 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1089 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
636 Points ∼56% -42%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
510 Points ∼45% -53%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
809 Points ∼71% -26%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
972 Points ∼86% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1136 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (989 - 1156, n=11)
1115 Points ∼98% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=216, last 2 years)
559 Points ∼49% -49%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3687 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1878 Points ∼50% -49%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1663 Points ∼44% -55%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2998 Points ∼79% -19%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
2870 Points ∼76% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3784 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3385 - 3810, n=11)
3623 Points ∼96% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=216, last 2 years)
1925 Points ∼51% -48%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4643 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1272 Points ∼26% -73%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
995 Points ∼21% -79%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2805 Points ∼58% -40%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3369 Points ∼70% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4279 Points ∼89% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3894 - 6176, n=10)
4816 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=108, last 2 years)
2030 Points ∼42% -56%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4676 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1304 Points ∼28% -72%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1082 Points ∼23% -77%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2809 Points ∼60% -40%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3555 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4674 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (4566 - 4764, n=10)
4669 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=112, last 2 years)
2124 Points ∼45% -55%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
14328 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10998 Points ∼75% -23%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
7880 Points ∼53% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
9712 Points ∼66% -32%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
14754 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
14586 Points ∼99% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (11823 - 18942, n=7)
14555 Points ∼99% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=236, last 2 years)
9876 Points ∼67% -31%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
13546 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9573 Points ∼71% -29%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
6380 Points ∼47% -53%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
10689 Points ∼79% -21%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
11166 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12876 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10438 - 15027, n=7)
12496 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=270, last 2 years)
7791 Points ∼58% -42%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3902 Points ∼56%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3461 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6989 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=260, last 2 years)
3314 Points ∼47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4076 Points ∼47%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3647 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8588 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=260, last 2 years)
3889 Points ∼45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3394 Points ∼80%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2938 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4233 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=260, last 2 years)
2721 Points ∼64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4040 Points ∼41%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3639 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5587 Points ∼57%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
8035 Points ∼82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (8562 - 11302, n=5)
9857 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=272, last 2 years)
3796 Points ∼39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4239 Points ∼29%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3842 Points ∼27%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8380 Points ∼58%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
13531 Points ∼93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (11227 - 16586, n=5)
14475 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=272, last 2 years)
4779 Points ∼33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3469 Points ∼74%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3070 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2567 Points ∼55%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3318 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3895 - 5344, n=5)
4694 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=270, last 2 years)
2839 Points ∼60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2750 Points ∼54%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2419 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5098 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=259, last 2 years)
2609 Points ∼51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2603 Points ∼43%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2289 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6087 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=259, last 2 years)
2778 Points ∼46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3428 Points ∼100%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3017 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3144 Points ∼92%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=259, last 2 years)
2766 Points ∼81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2927 Points ∼31%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2536 Points ∼27%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4478 Points ∼48%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
6960 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
9343 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (8347 - 9839, n=6)
9245 Points ∼99%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=271, last 2 years)
3095 Points ∼33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2802 Points ∼23%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2440 Points ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6148 Points ∼51%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
10199 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12023 Points ∼99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (11050 - 12914, n=6)
12092 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=271, last 2 years)
3443 Points ∼28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3466 Points ∼66%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2941 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2354 Points ∼45%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3296 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5249 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (4497 - 5366, n=6)
5070 Points ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=271, last 2 years)
2896 Points ∼55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2582 Points ∼55%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2267 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4699 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 6977, n=212, last 2 years)
2638 Points ∼56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2520 Points ∼44%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2186 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5785 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 11259, n=212, last 2 years)
2976 Points ∼51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2823 Points ∼100%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2606 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2795 Points ∼99%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=212, last 2 years)
2646 Points ∼94%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5786 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1103 Points ∼19% -81%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
980 Points ∼17% -83%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3196 Points ∼55% -45%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
4166 Points ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5599 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5598 - 5887, n=10)
5723 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=76, last 2 years)
2792 Points ∼48% -52%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5578 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1097 Points ∼19% -80%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
974 Points ∼17% -83%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3212 Points ∼56% -42%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
4152 Points ∼72% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5678 Points ∼99% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5578 - 5876, n=10)
5736 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=73, last 2 years)
3045 Points ∼53% -45%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
120 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
53 fps ∼44% -56%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
59 fps ∼49% -51%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps ∼75% -25%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
120 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (60 - 143, n=9)
103 fps ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=219, last 2 years)
55.7 fps ∼46% -54%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
279 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
56 fps ∼20% -80%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
81 fps ∼29% -71%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
153 fps ∼55% -45%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
224 fps ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
268 fps ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (230 - 290, n=9)
266 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=219, last 2 years)
103 fps ∼37% -63%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
120 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
33 fps ∼28% -72%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
26 fps ∼22% -78%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
79 fps ∼66% -34%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
89 fps ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
91 fps ∼76% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (55 - 120, n=9)
93.1 fps ∼78% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=217, last 2 years)
43.9 fps ∼37% -63%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
177 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
33 fps ∼19% -81%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
41 fps ∼23% -77%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps ∼51% -49%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
131 fps ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
158 fps ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (101 - 177, n=9)
150 fps ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=218, last 2 years)
60.1 fps ∼34% -66%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
105 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
25 fps ∼24% -76%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
26 fps ∼25% -75%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
57 fps ∼54% -46%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
79 fps ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
59 fps ∼56% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (36 - 105, n=9)
73.6 fps ∼70% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=215, last 2 years)
34.3 fps ∼33% -67%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
120 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
26 fps ∼22% -78%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
29 fps ∼24% -76%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
65 fps ∼54% -46%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
92 fps ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
111 fps ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (69 - 121, n=9)
103 fps ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=215, last 2 years)
41.2 fps ∼34% -66%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
61 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps ∼26% -74%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
14 fps ∼23% -77%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
35 fps ∼57% -43%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
33 fps ∼54% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (28 - 61, n=9)
45 fps ∼74% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=214, last 2 years)
21.5 fps ∼35% -65%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
72 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps ∼22% -78%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
16 fps ∼22% -78%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
40 fps ∼56% -44%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
57 fps ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
67 fps ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (42 - 72, n=9)
62.1 fps ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=214, last 2 years)
24.7 fps ∼34% -66%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
73 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
18 fps ∼25% -75%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
16 fps ∼22% -78%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
42 fps ∼58% -42%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
49 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
41 fps ∼56% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (38 - 73, n=10)
55.5 fps ∼76% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=275, last 2 years)
21.6 fps ∼30% -70%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
85 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20 fps ∼24% -76%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
18 fps ∼21% -79%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
50 fps ∼59% -41%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
57 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
79 fps ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (57 - 87, n=11)
73.9 fps ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=275, last 2 years)
24.7 fps ∼29% -71%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
46 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
11 fps ∼24% -76%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
9.9 fps ∼22% -78%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
26 fps ∼57% -43%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
31 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
25 fps ∼54% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (25 - 46, n=10)
36.8 fps ∼80% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=276, last 2 years)
14.3 fps ∼31% -69%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
32 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7.6 fps ∼24% -76%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
6.5 fps ∼20% -80%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
18 fps ∼56% -44%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
22 fps ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
29 fps ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (26 - 32, n=10)
28.9 fps ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=275, last 2 years)
9.81 fps ∼31% -69%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
211932 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
42629 Points ∼19% -80%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
4722 Points ∼2% -98%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6472 Points ∼3% -97%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
209984 Points ∼94% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (171404 - 264766, n=6)
223049 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 264766, n=54, last 2 years)
56522 Points ∼25% -73%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6893 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3459 Points ∼50% -50%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3260 Points ∼47% -53%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5068 Points ∼74% -26%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
5916 Points ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6361 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6043 - 6959, n=9)
6617 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=203, last 2 years)
3537 Points ∼51% -49%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10923 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6242 Points ∼57% -43%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
6308 Points ∼58% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
9557 Points ∼87% -13%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
8852 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10377 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9696 - 11774, n=9)
10894 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=203, last 2 years)
6490 Points ∼59% -41%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
7948 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4211 Points ∼48% -47%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3484 Points ∼40% -56%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6172 Points ∼70% -22%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
6757 Points ∼77% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8789 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6300 - 9044, n=9)
7838 Points ∼89% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=203, last 2 years)
4139 Points ∼47% -48%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
15628 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3989 Points ∼26% -74%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3780 Points ∼24% -76%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7202 Points ∼46% -54%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
11431 Points ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12732 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (12630 - 15628, n=9)
13454 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=203, last 2 years)
5461 Points ∼35% -65%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1726 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1365 Points ∼76% -21%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1360 Points ∼76% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1563 Points ∼87% -9%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
1791 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1434 Points ∼80% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1434 - 1983, n=9)
1701 Points ∼95% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=203, last 2 years)
1249 Points ∼70% -28%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
804683 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
393060 Points ∼49% -51%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
325785 Points ∼40% -60%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
521880 Points ∼65% -35%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
678958 Points ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (795730 - 815441, n=5)
805549 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (121238 - 815441, n=26, last 2 years)
478622 Points ∼59% -41%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro (Chrome90)
108.239 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
91.208 Points ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (61.3 - 108, n=7)
89.1 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
75.831 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
56.483 Points ∼52% -48%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=185, last 2 years)
49.7 Points ∼46% -54%
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)
49.39 Points ∼46% -54%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
160.92 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (119 - 192, n=8)
156 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
135.67 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
92.34 Points ∼57%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=193, last 2 years)
88.2 Points ∼55%
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)
84.271 Points ∼52%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro (Chrome90)
109 runs/min ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (54.7 - 114, n=7)
82.9 runs/min ∼76% -24%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chome 90)
73.6 runs/min ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
70.8 runs/min ∼65% -35%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=163, last 2 years)
50.9 runs/min ∼47% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
45.44 runs/min ∼42% -58%
Nokia X20 (Chome 90)
38.7 runs/min ∼36% -64%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
147 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (103 - 160, n=8)
135 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
106 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
82 Points ∼56%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=204, last 2 years)
77.3 Points ∼53%
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)
70 Points ∼48%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro (Chrome90)
37392 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
34161 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (23843 - 38401, n=9)
32322 Points ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
26943 Points ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
17730 Points ∼47% -53%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=213, last 2 years)
17006 Points ∼45% -55%
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)
15958 Points ∼43% -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=216, last 2 years)
4242 ms * ∼100% -226%
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)
2748.8 ms * ∼65% -111%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
2393.3 ms * ∼56% -84%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
1802.32 ms * ∼42% -38%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
1589.3 ms * ∼37% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (1297 - 1808, n=9)
1554 ms * ∼37% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro (Chrome90)
1301.49 ms * ∼31%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi K40 ProSamsung Galaxy A52 5GNokia X20Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5GMotorola Moto G100Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-31%
-44%
-17%
6%
1%
-52%
Sequential Read 256KB
1456.39
926.67
-36%
489.3
-66%
949.43
-35%
1729.8
19%
1559 (1330 - 1730, n=16)
7%
728 (41.9 - 2037, n=281, last 2 years)
-50%
Sequential Write 256KB
709.43
484.62
-32%
462.7
-35%
710.31
0%
716.8
1%
765 (527 - 1095, n=16)
8%
313 (11.9 - 1321, n=281, last 2 years)
-56%
Random Read 4KB
209.56
176.05
-16%
165.4
-21%
207.95
-1%
253.6
21%
235 (133 - 317, n=16)
12%
130 (13.5 - 325, n=281, last 2 years)
-38%
Random Write 4KB
305.98
179.23
-41%
144.6
-53%
206.89
-32%
252.9
-17%
235 (121 - 306, n=16)
-23%
114 (4.97 - 330, n=281, last 2 years)
-63%
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.8 (3150min - 3144max) % ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.7 (1097min - 1100max) % ∼100% +9%
Nokia X20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 (973min - 977max) % ∼100% +9%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 (4109min - 4141max) % ∼99% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91.1 (5313min - 5833max) % ∼91%
Hög belastning
 39.7 °C39.8 °C37.7 °C 
 39.2 °C40.2 °C37.4 °C 
 39.2 °C38.9 °C36.2 °C 
Max: 40.2 °C
Medel: 38.7 °C
35.5 °C37.8 °C39.9 °C
35.5 °C37.6 °C40.3 °C
33.5 °C36.8 °C37 °C
Max: 40.3 °C
Medel: 37.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  29.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.129.9252827.43124.121.14025.323.6503637.7632428.78020.622.710014.519.812510.336.616013.648.420011.747.425011.452.431512.457.840010.159.650011.764.363011.56880010.170.8100010.376.3125010.979.4160012.477.7200010.773.7250011.976.1315012.777.4400013.176.8500013.173.1630013.674.4800014.370.51000013.672.31250014.166.11600014.663.6SPL24.587.4N0.569.9median 12.4median 70.5Delta1.310.439.642.434.734.424.726.623.521.642.433.528.425.523.925.920.425.115.331.62049.814.64813.153.61461.11160.310.363.11163.710.267.210.372.210.874.610.977.211.680.212.278.912.277.512.58113.477.513.177.11574.213.873.714.166.91659.424.7890.673.6median 13.1median 67.2211.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi K40 ProSamsung Galaxy A52 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.34 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.93 / 1.46 / 1.49 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.17 / 9.22 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
4520 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
4250 mAh
Motorola Moto G100
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
3%
-4%
-13%
-12%
-6%
Idle Minimum *
0.93
0.92
1%
0.83
11%
0.9
3%
1.052 (0.59 - 1.6, n=9)
-13%
0.932 (0.37 - 2.5, n=232, last 2 years)
-0%
Idle Average *
1.46
1.78
-22%
1.92
-32%
1.5
-3%
1.607 (1.08 - 2, n=9)
-10%
1.842 (0.82 - 3.94, n=232, last 2 years)
-26%
Idle Maximum *
1.49
1.81
-21%
1.97
-32%
2.1
-41%
1.803 (1.14 - 2.7, n=9)
-21%
2.12 (0.85 - 4.2, n=232, last 2 years)
-42%
Load Average *
5.17
3.86
25%
3.84
26%
6.7
-30%
5.48 (4.24 - 6.38, n=9)
-6%
4.44 (2.1 - 8.4, n=232, last 2 years)
14%
Load Maximum *
9.22
6.14
33%
8.6
7%
8.5
8%
10.1 (6.83 - 11.7, n=9)
-10%
7.23 (3.16 - 12.3, n=232, last 2 years)
22%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12tim 04min
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
4520 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
4500 mAh
Nokia X20
4470 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
4250 mAh
Motorola Moto G100
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
724
710
-2%
879
21%
734
1%
1049
45%

För

+ Väldigt ljusstark 120 Hz OLED-skärm
+ Prestanda
+ UFS 3.1-minne
+ Bra stereohögtalare

Emot

- Inget teleobjektiv
- Mycket spillvärme
- USB 2.0
- Den främre kameran saknar UHD-funktion
- Saknar OIS och trådlös laddning

Omdöme: Redmi K40 Pro

Recension av Redmi K40 Pro. Recensionsex från TradingShenzhen.
Recension av Redmi K40 Pro. Recensionsex från TradingShenzhen.

Redmi K40 Pro är ett kraftpaket gjord för prestanda med en utmärkt OLED-skärm och bra stereohögtalare. Xiaomis smartphone kommer med hela paketet för ett pris på 4000 - 5000 kronor, vilket är svårt att slå. Men den som är intresserad får eventuellt vänta på att nya Poco F3 släpps. Vidare förekommer Xiaomis kända svagheter (USB 2.0, inget UHD-stöd på den främre kameran) också på K40 Pro.

Om du prioriterar prestanda och skärm kommer du inte att hitta en bättre smartphone än K40 Pro för under 4.500 kronor.

Den välkända kamerasensorn från Sony presterar riktigt bra i dagsljus men sätter inte direkt någon ny standard i det övre mittenskiktet. Eftersom Xiaomi inte har fokuserat på kamerakvalitet har K40 Pro heller varken teleobjektiv eller OIS. Ultra-vidvinkelslinsen, med sin sensor på 8 MP, har också märkbart sämre kvalitet.

Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro - 05/21/2021 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Design
86%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Mus
95%
Anslutningar
53 / 70 → 76%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
89%
Skärm
92%
Spelprestanda
65 / 64 → 100%
Programprestanda
90 / 86 → 100%
Temperatur
90%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 85%
Camera
65%
Medel
81%
87%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 181024 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro - Flaggskeppsprestanda till mittenskiktspris (Sammanfattning)
Marcus Herbrich, 2021-05-26 (Update: 2021-05-26)