Notebookcheck

Test: Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G - Nästan för bra för en Lite-smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Snabbare än Xiaomi Mi 11?! Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G är en tunn och lätt smartphone från mittenskiktet som kommer med nya Snapdragon 780G. Trots ett lägre pris lyckas den slå Xiaomi Mi 11 på en del områden.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Mi 11 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G 8 x 1.9 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 642
Minne
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Skärm
6.55 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 402 PPI, Tryckkänslig, Kapacitiv, AMOLED, 240 Hz bilduppdatering, glansig: ja, HDR, 90 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: USB Typ-C, Kortläsare: microSD-plats (delat, upp till 512GB, exFAT-stöd), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerationssensor, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Kompass, OTG, IR-Sändare, Miracast
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B20/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 6.81 x 160.53 x 75.72
Batteri
4250 mAh Litiumjon
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/​1.79, fasjämförande AF, dubbel LED-blixt) + 8.0 MP (f/​2.2, vidvinkelslins) + 5.0 MP (f/​2.4, makrolins)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/​2.24)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Dubbla, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Fodral, 33 W Laddare, USB-kabel, MiUI 12, 12 Månader Garanti, Widevine L1, fanless
Vikt
159 g
Pris
400 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
sökrelation
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86 %
05/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
SD 780G 5G, Adreno 642
159 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
83 %
04/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
82 %
03/2021
Oppo Find X3 Lite
SD 765G, Adreno 620
172 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
83 %
08/2020
OnePlus Nord
SD 765G, Adreno 620
184 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.44"2440x1080
85 %
05/2021
Motorola Moto G100
SD 870, Adreno 650
207 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2520x1080
84 %
08/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080
Recension av Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Recension av Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Recension av Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Recension av Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Recension av Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Recension av Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Recension av Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Recension av Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

Storleksjämförelse

168.4 mm 74 mm 9.7 mm 207 g163.7 mm 74.8 mm 7.9 mm 192 g159.9 mm 75.1 mm 8.4 mm 189 g160.53 mm 75.72 mm 6.81 mm 159 g159.1 mm 73.4 mm 7.9 mm 172 g158.3 mm 73.3 mm 8.2 mm 184 g
SDCardreader Transfer Speed - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
50.32 MB/s ∼100% +178%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18.08 MB/s ∼36%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580859051.552.451.150.152.351.850.246.7384640.841.940.738.842.536.638.637.436.941.44142.344.438.234.842.140.637.441.948.243.238.441.841.741.240.740.436.537.640.538.346.34139.940.239.241.337.44140.536.140.739.738.141.840.837.838.239.241.641.341.439.942.63638.940.340.936.341.741.54236.437.939.138.941.64140.338.840.240.741.537.937.444.741.43638.64041.241.942.237.142.543.442.242.538.139.343.140.139.239.636.341.241.835.440.340.842.141.936.939.343.739.442.639.83940.136.745.243.741.944.342.23941.450.748.850.248.652.449.551.742.639.737.642.341.338.143.236.238.937.439.636.839.841.84141.536.840.740.739.335.540.637.740.840.241.54140.139413641.441.138.54344.338.740.737.939.141.24139.236.443.144.241.239.238.235.542.842.235.341.541.242.340.842.53641.942.645.642.941.441.941.942.44237.942.739.838.242.441.539.840.839.238.436.239.136.740.944.534.942.342.134.738.64040.239.336.742.94140.539.439.744.241.9424540.34240.840.339.445.340.23840.641.137.44440.438.538.543.937.639.637.742.451.552.451.150.152.351.850.246.7384640.841.940.738.842.536.638.637.436.941.44142.344.438.234.842.140.637.441.948.243.238.441.841.741.240.740.436.537.640.538.346.34139.940.239.241.337.44140.536.140.739.738.141.840.837.838.239.241.641.341.439.942.63638.940.340.936.341.741.54236.437.939.138.941.64140.338.840.240.741.537.937.444.741.43638.64041.241.942.237.142.543.442.242.538.139.343.140.139.239.636.341.241.835.440.340.842.141.936.939.343.739.442.639.83940.136.745.243.741.944.342.23941.450.748.850.248.652.449.551.742.639.737.642.341.338.143.236.238.937.439.636.839.841.84141.536.840.740.739.335.540.637.740.840.241.54140.139413641.441.138.54344.338.740.737.939.141.24139.236.443.144.241.239.238.235.542.842.235.341.541.242.340.842.53641.942.645.642.941.441.941.942.44237.942.739.838.242.441.539.840.839.238.436.239.136.740.944.534.942.342.134.738.64040.239.336.742.94140.539.439.744.241.9424540.34240.840.339.445.340.23840.641.137.44440.438.538.543.937.639.637.742.431.388.887.687.985.591.288.3888788.587.68888.583.484.782.490.579.18688.58389.888.578.491.886.888.187.588.387.988.786.888.385.188.687.188.887.688.287.281.189.487.484.889.785.288.287.48887.889.685.989.387.886.587.989.887.387.985.890.187.285.985.489.28587.881.584.685.886.788.88487.687.582.389.686.181.190.492.385.487.487.784.689.588.187.889.286.886.287.786.189.587.687.787.888.888.38887.489.185.989.686.888.287.988.287.788.987.189.884.788.486.187.983.692.588.186.984.685.984.590.287.987.587.488.345.454.667.679.28078.975.179.579.879.480.280.161.470.269.174.97468.963.376.578.668.871.677.676.267.163.569.969.562.849.57865.879.774.667.972.871.575.371.272.677.97476.977.571.270.769.666.860.273.480.47479.478.770.376.47575.877.578.97979.67378.676.978.178.679.679.679.979.978.279.97775.978.17979.779.779.379.177.676.975.475.976.669.577.177.377.77878.779.576.379.777.478.17977.878.67673.378.579.279.378.375.678.67977.77552.368.670.176.873.478.278.37778.876.877.477.377.974.371.478.1Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential write: Ø40.9 (34.8-52.4)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø40.8 (34.7-52.4)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential read: Ø86.8 (31.3-92.5)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø74.7 (45.4-80.4)
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
891 (847min - 921max) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 (643min - 704max) MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 (618min - 677max) MBit/s ∼75% -25%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
563 (275min - 666max) MBit/s ∼63% -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=293, last 2 years)
401 MBit/s ∼45% -55%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
303 (164min - 328max) MBit/s ∼34% -66%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (275min - 287max) MBit/s ∼32% -68%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
874 (833min - 900max) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Moto G100
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
788 (733min - 833max) MBit/s ∼90% -10%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 (563min - 668max) MBit/s ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (545min - 662max) MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=293, last 2 years)
409 MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
342 (335min - 348max) MBit/s ∼39% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
331 (322min - 337max) MBit/s ∼38% -62%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900839842878833882844842897850880893887876900869863876866878842865884893897892858897879890898839842878833882844842897850880893887876900869863876866878842865884893897892858897879890898897891887890903921883892892897891908886896910873847888872867901898889893902883898889887908Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø873 (833-900)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø891 (847-921)
Navigering med Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Navigering med Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Navigering med Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Navigering med Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Navigering med Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Navigering med Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Ultra-vidvinkelsfoto
Ultra-vidvinkelsfoto
Ultra-vidvinkelsfoto (med AI)
Ultra-vidvinkelsfoto (med AI)
Ultra-vidvinkelsfoto (utan AI)
10x zoom (max)
Ultra-vidvinkelsfoto
Vidvinkelsfoto

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WeitwinkelWeitwinkelLow Light5x-ZoomUltraweitwinkel
click to load images
ColorChecker
20.8 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
12 ∆E
8 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G: 11.35 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 25.66 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.8 ∆E
49.7 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
48.2 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
56.6 ∆E
59.1 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
61.4 ∆E
63.5 ∆E
49.1 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
24 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G: 41.65 ∆E min: 14.11 - max: 64.12 ∆E
834
cd/m²
856
cd/m²
879
cd/m²
834
cd/m²
863
cd/m²
883
cd/m²
838
cd/m²
861
cd/m²
894
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Max: 894 cd/m² Medel: 860.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.01 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 863 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.33
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Oppo Find X3 Lite
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
OnePlus Nord
AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.44
Motorola Moto G100
IPS/LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.57
Screen
3%
-15%
2%
-43%
17%
Brightness middle
863
744
-14%
569
-34%
529
-39%
562
-35%
584
-32%
Brightness
860
749
-13%
572
-33%
531
-38%
535
-38%
583
-32%
Brightness Distribution
93
98
5%
97
4%
94
1%
90
-3%
97
4%
Black Level *
0.57
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.2
2.2
31%
3.2
-0%
2.53
21%
3.99
-25%
1.17
63%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.2
7
-35%
6
-15%
4.52
13%
9.74
-87%
2.95
43%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.9
2.1
46%
4.3
-10%
1.7
56%
6.5
-67%
1.7
56%
Gamma
2.33 94%
2.06 107%
2.23 99%
2.249 98%
2.174 101%
2.231 99%
CCT
7299 89%
6516 100%
6607 98%
6462 101%
6882 94%
6341 103%
Contrast
986

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 367.6 Hz ≤ 68 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 367.6 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 68 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 367.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.2 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
809 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
636 Points ∼65% -21%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
615 Points ∼63% -24%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
611 Points ∼63% -24%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
972 Points ∼100% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
673 Points ∼69% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
809 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=218, last 2 years)
558 Points ∼57% -31%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2998 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1878 Points ∼63% -37%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1810 Points ∼60% -40%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1966 Points ∼66% -34%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
2870 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1908 Points ∼64% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
2998 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=218, last 2 years)
1921 Points ∼64% -36%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2805 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1272 Points ∼38% -55%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1172 Points ∼35% -58%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1169 Points ∼35% -58%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3369 Points ∼100% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1183 Points ∼35% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
2805 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=110, last 2 years)
2026 Points ∼60% -28%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2809 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1304 Points ∼37% -54%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1231 Points ∼35% -56%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1242 Points ∼35% -56%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3555 Points ∼100% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1293 Points ∼36% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
2809 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=114, last 2 years)
2119 Points ∼60% -25%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
9712 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10998 Points ∼75% +13%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
11041 Points ∼75% +14%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
10876 Points ∼74% +12%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
14754 Points ∼100% +52%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8730 Points ∼59% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
9712 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=231, last 2 years)
9896 Points ∼67% +2%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
10689 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9573 Points ∼86% -10%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9800 Points ∼88% -8%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9427 Points ∼84% -12%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
11166 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7786 Points ∼70% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
10689 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=265, last 2 years)
7803 Points ∼70% -27%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
47838 Points ∼100%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
45872 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
45304 Points ∼95%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=217, last 2 years)
39378 Points ∼82%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
70216 Points ∼100%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69285 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
69506 Points ∼99%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=217, last 2 years)
56697 Points ∼81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
22614 Points ∼98%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21016 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
20429 Points ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=217, last 2 years)
22969 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6989 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3902 Points ∼56% -44%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4606 Points ∼66% -34%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4665 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4693 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
6989 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=258, last 2 years)
3323 Points ∼48% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8588 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4076 Points ∼47% -53%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5144 Points ∼60% -40%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5171 Points ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5832 Points ∼68% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
8588 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=258, last 2 years)
3904 Points ∼45% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4233 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3394 Points ∼80% -20%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3371 Points ∼80% -20%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3476 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3452 Points ∼82% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
4233 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=258, last 2 years)
2719 Points ∼64% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5587 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4040 Points ∼50% -28%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4783 Points ∼60% -14%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4815 Points ∼60% -14%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
8035 Points ∼100% +44%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4893 Points ∼61% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
5587 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=270, last 2 years)
3809 Points ∼47% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8380 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4239 Points ∼31% -49%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5383 Points ∼40% -36%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5357 Points ∼40% -36%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
13531 Points ∼100% +61%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5335 Points ∼39% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
8380 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=270, last 2 years)
4799 Points ∼35% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2567 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3469 Points ∼98% +35%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3441 Points ∼97% +34%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3555 Points ∼100% +38%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3318 Points ∼93% +29%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3492 Points ∼98% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
2567 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=268, last 2 years)
2844 Points ∼80% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5098 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2750 Points ∼54% -46%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3299 Points ∼65% -35%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3330 Points ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3346 Points ∼66% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
5098 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=256, last 2 years)
2605 Points ∼51% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6087 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2603 Points ∼43% -57%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3286 Points ∼54% -46%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3284 Points ∼54% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3321 Points ∼55% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
6087 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=256, last 2 years)
2771 Points ∼46% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3144 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3428 Points ∼98% +9%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3345 Points ∼95% +6%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3503 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3425 Points ∼98% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
3144 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=256, last 2 years)
2764 Points ∼79% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4478 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2927 Points ∼42% -35%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3535 Points ∼51% -21%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3553 Points ∼51% -21%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
6960 Points ∼100% +55%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3605 Points ∼52% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
4478 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=268, last 2 years)
3095 Points ∼44% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6148 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2802 Points ∼27% -54%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3557 Points ∼35% -42%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3556 Points ∼35% -42%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
10199 Points ∼100% +66%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3589 Points ∼35% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
6148 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=268, last 2 years)
3443 Points ∼34% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2354 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3466 Points ∼98% +47%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3459 Points ∼98% +47%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3544 Points ∼100% +51%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
3296 Points ∼93% +40%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3495 Points ∼99% +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
2354 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=268, last 2 years)
2900 Points ∼82% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4699 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2582 Points ∼55% -45%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3094 Points ∼66% -34%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3108 Points ∼66% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3130 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
4699 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 6977, n=210, last 2 years)
2631 Points ∼56% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5785 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2520 Points ∼44% -56%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3186 Points ∼55% -45%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3185 Points ∼55% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3198 Points ∼55% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
5785 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 11259, n=210, last 2 years)
2969 Points ∼51% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2795 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2823 Points ∼98% +1%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2809 Points ∼97% +1%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2867 Points ∼99% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2893 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
2795 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=210, last 2 years)
2645 Points ∼91% -5%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3196 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1103 Points ∼26% -65%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1681 Points ∼40% -47%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
4166 Points ∼100% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
3196 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=76, last 2 years)
2792 Points ∼67% -13%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3212 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1097 Points ∼26% -66%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1681 Points ∼40% -48%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
4152 Points ∼100% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
3212 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=73, last 2 years)
3045 Points ∼73% -5%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
53 fps ∼59% -41%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
59 fps ∼66% -34%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
60 fps ∼67% -33%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
90 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=216, last 2 years)
55.8 fps ∼62% -38%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
153 fps ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
56 fps ∼25% -63%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
96 fps ∼43% -37%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
97 fps ∼43% -37%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
224 fps ∼100% +46%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
95 fps ∼42% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
153 fps ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=216, last 2 years)
103 fps ∼46% -33%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
79 fps ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
33 fps ∼37% -58%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
53 fps ∼60% -33%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼56% -37%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
89 fps ∼100% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps ∼62% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
79 fps ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=214, last 2 years)
43.9 fps ∼49% -44%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
33 fps ∼25% -63%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
55 fps ∼42% -39%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
55 fps ∼42% -39%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
131 fps ∼100% +46%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
49 fps ∼37% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
90 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=215, last 2 years)
60.4 fps ∼46% -33%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
57 fps ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
25 fps ∼32% -56%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
37 fps ∼47% -35%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼43% -40%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
79 fps ∼100% +39%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
33 fps ∼42% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
57 fps ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=212, last 2 years)
34.5 fps ∼44% -39%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
65 fps ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
26 fps ∼28% -60%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
37 fps ∼40% -43%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼41% -42%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
92 fps ∼100% +42%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38 fps ∼41% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
65 fps ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=212, last 2 years)
41.4 fps ∼45% -36%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
35 fps ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps ∼34% -54%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼45% -40%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼40% -46%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼100% +34%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼38% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
35 fps ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=211, last 2 years)
21.6 fps ∼46% -38%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
40 fps ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps ∼28% -60%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼37% -47%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼37% -47%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
57 fps ∼100% +43%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼37% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
40 fps ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=211, last 2 years)
24.8 fps ∼44% -38%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
42 fps ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
18 fps ∼37% -57%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23 fps ∼47% -45%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼43% -50%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
49 fps ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼43% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
42 fps ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=272, last 2 years)
21.5 fps ∼44% -49%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
50 fps ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20 fps ∼35% -60%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23 fps ∼40% -54%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼42% -52%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
57 fps ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
24 fps ∼42% -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
50 fps ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=272, last 2 years)
24.7 fps ∼43% -51%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
26 fps ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
11 fps ∼35% -58%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
15 fps ∼48% -42%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼42% -50%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
31 fps ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼42% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
26 fps ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=273, last 2 years)
14.2 fps ∼46% -45%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
18 fps ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7.6 fps ∼35% -58%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.4 fps ∼38% -53%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼39% -53%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
22 fps ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps ∼39% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
18 fps ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=272, last 2 years)
9.79 fps ∼45% -46%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
468196 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
334292 Points ∼57% -29%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
332305 Points ∼57% -29%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
332074 Points ∼56% -29%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
588115 Points ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
318669 Points ∼54% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
468196 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=180, last 2 years)
333545 Points ∼57% -29%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6472 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
42629 Points ∼78% +559%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
6472 Points ∼12% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 264766, n=56, last 2 years)
54828 Points ∼100% +747%
Basemark GPU 1.2
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
54.98 (26.87min - 84.59max) fps ∼68%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
80.6 fps ∼100% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
55 fps ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.7 - 98.8, n=40, last 2 years)
37.3 fps ∼46% -32%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
49.69 (25.09min - 83.87max) fps ∼73%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
68.5 fps ∼100% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
49.7 fps ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 74.1, n=39, last 2 years)
31.7 fps ∼46% -36%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
327.65 (128.58min - 2098.43max) fps ∼63%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
517.72 fps ∼100% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
328 fps ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (29.8 - 559, n=35, last 2 years)
228 fps ∼44% -30%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
47.98 (24.754min - 71.53max) fps ∼65%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
74.19 fps ∼100% +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
48 fps ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.79 - 84.4, n=39, last 2 years)
35.8 fps ∼48% -25%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
52.56 (25.32min - 86.8max) fps ∼82%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
63.85 fps ∼100% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
52.6 fps ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.5 - 68.7, n=39, last 2 years)
29.8 fps ∼47% -43%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5068 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3459 Points ∼58% -32%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4025 Points ∼68% -21%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4054 Points ∼69% -20%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
5916 Points ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4094 Points ∼69% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
5068 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=200, last 2 years)
3534 Points ∼60% -30%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
9557 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6242 Points ∼65% -35%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6774 Points ∼71% -29%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6801 Points ∼71% -29%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
8852 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6069 Points ∼64% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
9557 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=200, last 2 years)
6485 Points ∼68% -32%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6172 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4211 Points ∼62% -32%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5102 Points ∼76% -17%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5296 Points ∼78% -14%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
6757 Points ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5683 Points ∼84% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
6172 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=200, last 2 years)
4130 Points ∼61% -33%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7202 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3989 Points ∼35% -45%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5206 Points ∼46% -28%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5203 Points ∼46% -28%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
11431 Points ∼100% +59%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5201 Points ∼45% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
7202 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=200, last 2 years)
5451 Points ∼48% -24%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1563 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1365 Points ∼76% -13%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1459 Points ∼81% -7%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1441 Points ∼80% -8%
Motorola Moto G100
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192
1791 Points ∼100% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1462 Points ∼82% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
 
1563 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=200, last 2 years)
1252 Points ∼70% -20%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
91.208 Points ∼100% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
75.831 Points ∼83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
75.8 Points ∼83% 0%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
58.665 Points ∼64% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
56.483 Points ∼62% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.232 Points ∼55% -34%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=183, last 2 years)
49.6 Points ∼54% -35%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
160.92 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
136 Points ∼85% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
135.67 Points ∼84%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
94.481 Points ∼59% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
93.643 Points ∼58% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
92.34 Points ∼57% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=192, last 2 years)
88 Points ∼55% -35%
Oppo Find X3 Lite (Chrome 88.0.4324.181)
79.988 Points ∼50% -41%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Motorola Moto G100 (Chome 90)
73.6 runs/min ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
70.8 runs/min ∼96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
70.8 runs/min ∼96% 0%
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84)
53.6 runs/min ∼73% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.7 runs/min ∼69% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=163, last 2 years)
50.5 runs/min ∼69% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
45.44 runs/min ∼62% -36%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
147 Points ∼100% +39%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
106 Points ∼72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
106 Points ∼72% 0%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
101 Points ∼69% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
82 Points ∼56% -23%
Oppo Find X3 Lite (Chrome 88.0.4324.181)
78 Points ∼53% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=202, last 2 years)
77 Points ∼52% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
76 Points ∼52% -28%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
34161 Points ∼100% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
26943 Points ∼79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
26943 Points ∼79% 0%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
19143 Points ∼56% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
18556 Points ∼54% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
17730 Points ∼52% -34%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=210, last 2 years)
17013 Points ∼50% -37%
Oppo Find X3 Lite (Chrome 88.0.4324.181)
15422 Points ∼45% -43%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=213, last 2 years)
4181 ms * ∼100% -132%
Oppo Find X3 Lite (Chrome 88.0.4324.181)
2941.1 ms * ∼70% -63%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
2834.8 ms * ∼68% -57%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
2602.2 ms * ∼62% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89)
2393.3 ms * ∼57% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
1802.32 ms * ∼43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
1802 ms * ∼43% -0%
Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90)
1589.3 ms * ∼38% +12%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5GSamsung Galaxy A52 5GOppo Find X3 LiteOnePlus NordMotorola Moto G100Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
-15%
-30%
32%
-22%
-32%
-40%
Sequential Read 256KB
949.43
926.67
-2%
953.46
0%
955.5
1%
1729.8
82%
979.54
3%
697 (497 - 954, n=9)
-27%
730 (41.9 - 2037, n=278, last 2 years)
-23%
Sequential Write 256KB
710.31
484.62
-32%
466.19
-34%
473.1
-33%
716.8
1%
476.87
-33%
387 (241 - 710, n=9)
-46%
317 (11.9 - 1321, n=278, last 2 years)
-55%
Random Read 4KB
207.95
176.05
-15%
194.66
-6%
126.7
-39%
253.6
22%
156.45
-25%
147 (105 - 208, n=9)
-29%
130 (13.5 - 325, n=278, last 2 years)
-37%
Random Write 4KB
206.89
179.23
-13%
166.03
-20%
104.5
-49%
252.9
22%
138.47
-33%
158 (121 - 207, n=9)
-24%
115 (4.97 - 330, n=278, last 2 years)
-44%
05101520253035404550556030303030303030303030303130303030303030303030303030303130303030303030303030303030303130303030303030303030303130302931303030303030303030312930313030303030303030303030313030303030303030303030303129313030303030303031303030303030303030303030312930303130303030303030312931293031303030303030303031293030303030303030303030303031303030303030303030303030303031303030303030303030303030303031303030303030303030303031303029313030303030303030303129303130303030303030303030303130303030303030303030303031293130303030303030313030303030303030303030303129303031303030303030303129312930313030303030303030312930306160596058615958606060606060596060606059586060615860596060605860566059596061595960606060606061606058596060596059616060585960586060606061605660606030303030303030303030303130303030303030303030303030303130303030303030303030303030303130303030303030303030303130302931303030303030303030312930313030303030303030303030313030303030303030303030303129313030303030303031303030303030303030303030312930303130303030303030312931293031303030303030303031293030616059605861595860606060606059606060605958606061586059606060586056605959606159596060606060606160605859606059605961606058596058606060606160566060606060606160606060605960596061606060606056575960606160606060605860605960606160606060595960606061606060605960606061606060605959606060606160606060595959595960616060596058606060606160606060595960606060606160606059605760593030303030303030303030313030303030303030303030303030313030303030303030303030303030313030303030303030303030313030293130303030303030303031293031303030303030303030303031303030303030303030303030312931303030303030303130303030303030303030303031293030313030303030303031293129303130303030303030303129303061605960586159586060606060605960606060595860606158605960606058605660595960615959606060606060616060585960605960596160605859605860606060616056606060606060616060606060596059606160606060605657596060616060606060586060596060616060606059596060606160606060596060606160606060595960606060616060606059595959596061606059605860606060616060606059596060606060616060605960576059616060596060606060606059605860606060616060606052616060606060596159606060606060606060576060605960605960606159606160606059615760566159585860595660586060605960606060586060606058606060606060606060596060605961606060606059596060606058616059606060605961606060606060606059606059606060606060606158596060303030303030303030303031303030303030303030303030303031303030303030303030303030303031303030303030303030303031303029313030303030303030303129303130303030303030303030303130303030303030303030303031293130303030303030313030303030303030303030303129303031303030303030303129312930313030303030303030312930306160596058615958606060606060596060606059586060615860596060605860566059596061595960606060606061606058596060596059616060585960586060606061605660606060606061606060606059605960616060606060565759606061606060606058606059606061606060605959606060616060606059606060616060606059596060606061606060605959595959606160605960586060606061