Notebookcheck

Test: VAIO A12 (Core i7-8500Y, 16 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD, FHD) Omvandlingsbar (Sammanfattning)

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Andreas Osthoff, T. Hinum (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 05/06/2019

Alldeles för dyr! VAIO, Sonys tidigare PC-avdelning, är tillbaka för att splittra marknaden, eller åtminstone göra ett försök till detta. En av deras återkomst-enheter är VAIO A12, en omvandlingsbar på 12.5 tum som kan få svårigheter med att berättiga sitt höga pris. Läs vidare för att få reda på hur A12 presterar i våra tester och för att få reda på om den kan besvära andra enheter på 12.5 tum såsom Surface Pro.

VAIO A12-92993
Processor
Intel Core i7-8500Y
Grafikkort
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Kärna: 300 - 1050 MHz, 25.20.100.6374
Minne
16384 MB 
, Fastlött, Dubbla kanaler, Max 16 GB
Skärm
12.5 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 176 PPI, native pen support, InfoVision IVO04E6, IPS, glansig: ja, detachable screen
Moderkort
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB 
, 452 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Anslutningar
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm kombinerad anslutning för hörlurar och mikrofon, Kortläsare: SD-kortläsare (SDHC/SDXC), upp till 32GB för SDHC, upp till 512GB för SDXC, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare
Nätverk
Realtek USB GBE Familiy Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1, Telit LN940, LTE
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 24 x 305.5 x 211.9
Batteri
23.4 Wh Litiumjon
Camera
Webbkamera: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.07 MPix
Secondary Camera: 0 MPix Windows Hello
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Nätadapter, VAIO Digitizer Pen, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
1.1 kg, Strömförsörjning: 290 g
Pris
2799 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

320 mm 235 mm 15.4 mm 1.5 kg305.5 mm 211.9 mm 24 mm 1.1 kg304 mm 225.6 mm 8.9 mm 1.3 kg300 mm 231.5 mm 7.9 mm 1.2 kg292 mm 210 mm 9.75 mm 1.3 kg292 mm 201 mm 8.5 mm 1.1 kg
Vänster sida: Kensington-lås, 2x USB 2.0 Typ A, SD-kortläsare
Vänster sida: Kensington-lås, 2x USB 2.0 Typ A, SD-kortläsare
Höger sida: Strömknapp, volymknapp med inbyggd fingeravtrycksläsare, micro-SIM, USB Typ C, 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, USB 3.0 Typ A, HDMI, VGA, RJ45 LAN, DC-in
Höger sida: Strömknapp, volymknapp med inbyggd fingeravtrycksläsare, micro-SIM, USB Typ C, 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, USB 3.0 Typ A, HDMI, VGA, RJ45 LAN, DC-in
Framsidan: Inga portar
Framsidan: Inga portar
Baksidan: Inga portar
Baksidan: Inga portar
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
142.2 MB/s ∼100% +394%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
78.9 MB/s ∼55% +174%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
78.5 MB/s ∼55% +173%
Average of class Convertible
  (7.5 - 197, n=115)
58.1 MB/s ∼41% +102%
VAIO A12-92993
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28.8 MB/s ∼20%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
211.8 MB/s ∼100% +611%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
86.4 MB/s ∼41% +190%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
84.2 MB/s ∼40% +183%
Average of class Convertible
  (21.7 - 246, n=113)
72.6 MB/s ∼34% +144%
VAIO A12-92993
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
29.8 MB/s ∼14%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
653 MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
633 MBit/s ∼97% +11%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
616 MBit/s ∼94% +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
593 (min: 560, max: 611) MBit/s ∼91% +4%
VAIO A12-92993
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
570 MBit/s ∼87%
Average of class Convertible
  (28.7 - 678, n=128)
482 MBit/s ∼74% -15%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
314 MBit/s ∼48% -45%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
598 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
VAIO A12-92993
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
588 MBit/s ∼98%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
559 (min: 519, max: 577) MBit/s ∼93% -5%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
532 MBit/s ∼89% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
514 MBit/s ∼86% -13%
Average of class Convertible
  (36.4 - 685, n=128)
489 MBit/s ∼82% -17%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
305 MBit/s ∼51% -48%
280
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 315 cd/m² Medel: 293.6 cd/m² Minimum: 9.3 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 315 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1500:1 (Svärta: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 2.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
69.5% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 44% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.02
VAIO A12-92993
InfoVision IVO04E6, , 1920x1080, 12.5
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
SHP1479, , 1920x1280, 12.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
LP130QP1-SPA1, , 3000x2000, 13
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
AU Optronics AUO101A, , 3000x2000, 13
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
AU Optronics AUO572D, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Response Times
720%
20%
-14%
13%
-10%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
52.8 (24.4, 28.4)
43 (21, 22)
19%
56.8 (26.8, 30)
-8%
47.2 (21.2, 26)
11%
47 (23, 24)
11%
52 (24.4, 27.6)
2%
Response Time Black / White *
30.4 (15.6, 14.8)
25 (13, 12)
18%
36 (19.6, 16.4)
-18%
42.4 (19.6, 22.8)
-39%
26 (14, 12)
14%
37.2 (21.2, 16)
-22%
PWM Frequency
990.1 (99)
22000 (50)
2122%
1852 (98)
87%
Screen
19%
10%
20%
5%
22%
Brightness middle
315
484
54%
548
74%
474
50%
452
43%
389.8
24%
Brightness
294
473
61%
545
85%
418
42%
412
40%
396
35%
Brightness Distribution
89
91
2%
86
-3%
76
-15%
85
-4%
88
-1%
Black Level *
0.21
0.33
-57%
0.51
-143%
0.33
-57%
0.48
-129%
0.27
-29%
Contrast
1500
1467
-2%
1075
-28%
1436
-4%
942
-37%
1444
-4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.4
4.29
2%
3.65
17%
3.2
27%
4.05
8%
2.72
38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.1
6.46
9%
7.15
-1%
6.1
14%
6.64
6%
5.49
23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.9
1.34
54%
1.81
38%
0.9
69%
1.56
46%
1.25
57%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.8
4.3
10%
5.5
-15%
4.5
6%
4.87
-1%
4.2
12%
Gamma
2.02 109%
2.51 88%
2.154 102%
2.07 106%
2.71 81%
2.1 105%
CCT
7307 89%
7315 89%
7052 92%
5881 111%
7160 91%
7470 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
44
62
41%
65.2
48%
64
45%
62
41%
62.2
41%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
69.5
95
37%
99.1
43%
99.4
43%
97
40%
98.2
41%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
370% / 169%
15% / 13%
3% / 15%
9% / 6%
6% / 17%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN: Gråskala (okalibrerad)
CalMAN: Gråskala (okalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (okalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (okalibrerad)
CalMAN: Färgmättnad (okalibrerad)
CalMAN: Färgmättnad (okalibrerad)
CalMAN: Gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: Gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.6 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24.4 ms rise
↘ 28.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 990.1 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 990.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 990.1 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9646 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC-latens
Intel Extreme Utility
Intel Extreme Utility (Benchmark)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
VAIO A12-92993 Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel Core i7-8500Y: Ø232 (221.39-245.57)
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel Core i7-8650U: Ø571 (559.56-638.59)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel Core i5-8350U: Ø488 (465.07-568.99)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U; Undervolting: Ø640 (589.9-694.88)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø550 (498.05-645.36)
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel Core i5-8350U: Ø486 (481.08-516.94)
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel Core i7-8500Y: Ø220 (212.35-271)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
163 Points ∼75% +29%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
151 Points ∼69% +20%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
147 Points ∼67% +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
141 Points ∼65% +12%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
132 Points ∼61% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (126 - 132, n=2)
129 Points ∼59% +2%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
126 Points ∼58%
Average of class Convertible
  (19 - 177, n=284)
103 Points ∼47% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
695 Points ∼16% +206%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
661 Points ∼15% +191%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
639 Points ∼15% +181%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
517 Points ∼12% +128%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
514 Points ∼12% +126%
Average of class Convertible
  (33 - 761, n=291)
284 Points ∼6% +25%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
271 Points ∼6% +19%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (227 - 271, n=2)
249 Points ∼6% +10%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
227 Points ∼5%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
1.71 Points ∼70% +16%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
1.69 Points ∼69% +15%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
1.47 Points ∼60%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (1.43 - 1.47, n=2)
1.45 Points ∼59% -1%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
1.43 Points ∼59% -3%
Average of class Convertible
  (0.24 - 2.01, n=216)
1.112 Points ∼46% -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
5.95 Points ∼22% +135%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
5.48 Points ∼20% +117%
Average of class Convertible
  (0.45 - 8.56, n=225)
2.77 Points ∼10% +9%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
2.53 Points ∼9%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (2.45 - 2.53, n=2)
2.49 Points ∼9% -2%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
2.45 Points ∼9% -3%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
320 Points ∼69%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
 
320 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Convertible
  (78 - 348, n=4)
229 Points ∼49% -28%
CPU (Multi Core)
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
584 Points ∼16%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
 
584 Points ∼16% 0%
Average of class Convertible
  (220 - 774, n=4)
516 Points ∼14% -12%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
32487 Points ∼65% +32%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
31171 Points ∼63% +26%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
30033 Points ∼60% +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
28118 Points ∼56% +14%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
24696 Points ∼50%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (24567 - 24696, n=2)
24632 Points ∼49% 0%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
24567 Points ∼49% -1%
Average of class Convertible
  (3067 - 42822, n=171)
21317 Points ∼43% -14%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Convertible
  (809 - 9177, n=180)
2542 ms * ∼4% -98%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
1822.2 ms * ∼3% -42%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (1281 - 1822, n=2)
1552 ms * ∼3% -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
1379.8 ms * ∼2% -8%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
1288.9 ms * ∼2% -1%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
1281.4 ms * ∼2%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
1189.2 ms * ∼2% +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
1177 ms * ∼2% +8%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Convertible
  (0.58 - 4.78, n=7)
2.98 fps ∼17% +41%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
2.12 fps ∼12%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
 
2.12 fps ∼12% 0%
Blender 2.79 - ---
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
2159 Seconds * ∼23% -22%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (1772 - 2159, n=2)
1965 Seconds * ∼21% -11%
Average of class Convertible
  (861 - 4929, n=7)
1946 Seconds * ∼21% -10%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
1771.6 Seconds * ∼19%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R20
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
 
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
1.32 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
2.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
27.17 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.47 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.53 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
27 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
126 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
227 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
37.07 fps
Hjälp
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
2952 Points ∼100% +49%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2939 Points ∼100% +49%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
2840 Points ∼96% +44%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2714 Points ∼92% +37%
Average of class Convertible
  (605 - 4342, n=81)
2399 Points ∼81% +21%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
1978 Points ∼67%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (1791 - 1978, n=2)
1885 Points ∼64% -5%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
1791 Points ∼61% -9%
Productivity
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
6238 Points ∼100% +4%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6026 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (5745 - 6026, n=2)
5886 Points ∼94% -2%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5745 Points ∼92% -5%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5698 Points ∼91% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5509 Points ∼88% -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
5353 Points ∼86% -11%
Average of class Convertible
  (1121 - 7045, n=83)
5092 Points ∼82% -15%
Essentials
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
7995 Points ∼100% +11%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7919 Points ∼99% +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7460 Points ∼93% +4%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7195 Points ∼90%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
7039 Points ∼88% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (6741 - 7195, n=2)
6968 Points ∼87% -3%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6741 Points ∼84% -6%
Average of class Convertible
  (2489 - 9291, n=83)
6731 Points ∼84% -6%
Score
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3737 Points ∼100% +18%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3559 Points ∼95% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3544 Points ∼95% +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
3448 Points ∼92% +9%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3161 Points ∼85%
Average of class Convertible
  (872 - 4347, n=84)
3063 Points ∼82% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (2945 - 3161, n=2)
3053 Points ∼82% -3%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2945 Points ∼79% -7%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4764 Points ∼100% +1%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4700 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (4406 - 4700, n=2)
4553 Points ∼96% -3%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4406 Points ∼92% -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
4262 Points ∼89% -9%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4200 Points ∼88% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4136 Points ∼87% -12%
Average of class Convertible
  (1007 - 5281, n=213)
3663 Points ∼77% -22%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3776 Points ∼100% +8%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3493 Points ∼93%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3479 Points ∼92% 0%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3413 Points ∼90% -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
3281 Points ∼87% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (2737 - 3493, n=2)
3115 Points ∼82% -11%
Average of class Convertible
  (741 - 4741, n=260)
2748 Points ∼73% -21%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2737 Points ∼72% -22%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3493 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4126 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4700 poäng
Hjälp
VAIO A12-92993
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-40%
-27%
-3%
-16%
-17%
42%
Write 4K
113.9
83.23
-27%
121.7
7%
95.43
-16%
90.97
-20%
140
23%
122 (90.4 - 166, n=36)
7%
Read 4K
46.8
43.84
-6%
32.66
-30%
39.19
-16%
36.84
-21%
52.38
12%
42.8 (28 - 61.3, n=35)
-9%
Write Seq
1868
636.4
-66%
359.3
-81%
1197
-36%
947.5
-49%
1492 (112 - 2125, n=36)
-20%
Read Seq
2226
899.7
-60%
1463
-34%
1705
-23%
922.1
-59%
1644 (501 - 2494, n=36)
-26%
Write 4K Q32T1
313.4
192.9
-38%
353.6
13%
399.24
27%
355.8
14%
227.8
-27%
416 (198 - 1707, n=36)
33%
Read 4K Q32T1
284.6
247.36
-13%
387
36%
260.67
-8%
256.9
-10%
299.2
5%
396 (268 - 1015, n=36)
39%
Write Seq Q32T1
1880.5
861.1
-54%
358.1
-81%
1286.9
-32%
1222
-35%
1259
-33%
1918 (1714 - 2128, n=36)
2%
Read Seq Q32T1
3401.9
1615
-53%
1779
-48%
3024.8
-11%
3460
2%
3112
-9%
2935 (1772 - 3487, n=36)
-14%
Write 4K Q8T8
410.2
381
-7%
1448 (410 - 1772, n=7)
253%
Read 4K Q8T8
526.7
749.95
42%
1356 (527 - 1620, n=7)
157%
AS SSD
-146%
-58%
-25%
-37%
-4%
-13%
Copy Game MB/s
875.77
676.35
-23%
317.31
-64%
512.25
-42%
971.31
11%
984 (607 - 1273, n=25)
12%
Copy Program MB/s
273.15
143.11
-48%
226.89
-17%
237.29
-13%
630.57
131%
409 (233 - 526, n=25)
50%
Copy ISO MB/s
1941.09
984.55
-49%
512.19
-74%
760.7
-61%
1373.65
-29%
1591 (917 - 3259, n=25)
-18%
Score Total
3462
1225
-65%
1469
-58%
2257
-35%
2105
-39%
3569
3%
3884 (2348 - 4771, n=34)
12%
Score Write
1042
280
-73%
544
-48%
794
-24%
770
-26%
823
-21%
1688 (147 - 2379, n=34)
62%
Score Read
1638
644
-61%
642
-61%
1008
-38%
917
-44%
1833
12%
1457 (896 - 2125, n=34)
-11%
Access Time Write *
0.029
0.3
-934%
0.053
-83%
0.032
-10%
0.041
-41%
0.037
-28%
0.1151 (0.026 - 2.52, n=34)
-297%
Access Time Read *
0.04
0.213
-433%
0.082
-105%
0.041
-3%
0.063
-58%
0.051
-28%
0.0494 (0.029 - 0.073, n=34)
-24%
4K-64 Write
767.22
171.3
-78%
411.22
-46%
596.93
-22%
596.11
-22%
605.28
-21%
1427 (96.2 - 2105, n=34)
86%
4K-64 Read
1316.36
494.14
-62%
472.74
-64%
740.67
-44%
669.32
-49%
1620.84
23%
1222 (664 - 1823, n=34)
-7%
4K Write
142.48
68.95
-52%
102.69
-28%
112.23
-21%
91.09
-36%
95.93
-33%
106 (1.76 - 142, n=34)
-26%
4K Read
56.79
34.42
-39%
30.97
-45%
42.48
-25%
41.45
-27%
42.69
-25%
49.9 (31.7 - 58, n=34)
-12%
Seq Write
1327.81
393.6
-70%
302.06
-77%
847
-36%
831.85
-37%
1213.77
-9%
1555 (487 - 1991, n=34)
17%
Seq Read
2650.04
1154.2
-56%
1385.48
-48%
2243
-15%
2062.08
-22%
1692.57
-36%
1853 (1049 - 2697, n=34)
-30%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-93% / -107%
-43% / -47%
-14% / -15%
-27% / -29%
-11% / -9%
15% / 10%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Sequential Read: 2465 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1856 MB/s
512K Read: 1739 MB/s
512K Write: 1840 MB/s
4K Read: 50.39 MB/s
4K Write: 89.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 202.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 262.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
1977 Points ∼100% +67%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1812 Points ∼92% +53%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1660 Points ∼84% +40%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1660 Points ∼84% +40%
Average of class Convertible
  (173 - 7483, n=312)
1203 Points ∼61% +2%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
1185 Points ∼60%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (1088 - 1257, n=3)
1177 Points ∼60% -1%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
1088 Points ∼55% -8%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Convertible
  (85 - 1682, n=25)
456 Points ∼100% +58%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
347 Points ∼76% +20%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
335 Points ∼73% +16%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
289 Points ∼63%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (226 - 289, n=2)
258 Points ∼57% -11%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
226 Points ∼50% -22%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1189 Points ∼100% +23%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1185 Points ∼100% +23%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1131 Points ∼95% +17%
Average of class Convertible
  (132 - 5965, n=221)
974 Points ∼82% +1%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
964 Points ∼81%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (733 - 964, n=3)
839 Points ∼71% -13%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
733 Points ∼62% -24%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
10213 Points ∼100% +35%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
9307 Points ∼91% +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9133 Points ∼89% +21%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
8330 Points ∼82% +10%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
7568 Points ∼74%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (6602 - 7568, n=3)
6954 Points ∼68% -8%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
6692 Points ∼66% -12%
Average of class Convertible
  (1023 - 37388, n=272)
6471 Points ∼63% -14%
3DMark 11 Performance
1291 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
41219 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5622 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
858 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
420 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
328 poäng
Hjälp
Hög belastning
 28.6 °C37.7 °C40 °C 
 28.7 °C37.3 °C42 °C 
 31.3 °C39.9 °C42.4 °C 
Max: 42.4 °C
Medel: 36.4 °C
42.4 °C40.8 °C27.4 °C
47.1 °C43.1 °C28.3 °C
44.8 °C42 °C29.2 °C
Max: 47.1 °C
Medel: 38.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  31.8 °C | Rumstemperatur 19.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-13.4 °C / -24.1 F).
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Heat
-9%
-15%
-7%
-21%
-18%
Maximum Upper Side *
42.4
40.4
5%
44.4
-5%
44.3
-4%
49.4
-17%
44.2
-4%
Maximum Bottom *
47.1
43.8
7%
52
-10%
48.9
-4%
47.1
-0%
48.2
-2%
Idle Upper Side *
26.6
33.5
-26%
32
-20%
30
-13%
38
-43%
33
-24%
Idle Bottom *
24.9
30.2
-21%
31.2
-25%
26.6
-7%
30.8
-24%
35.6
-43%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.331.12527.225.63128.728.24027.429.95025.329.76323.2268022.422.310022.522.612521.823.216021.822.420021.622.325021.123.731520.526.24002033.75001940.463019.346.880019.149.4100018.357.8125017.358.6160016.764.2200016.562.8250016.162.9315015.661.1400015.861.5500015.864.3630015.669.9800015.463.71000015.452.81250015.344.81600015.235.4SPL29.274.8N1.229.8median 17.3median 49.4Delta2.415.83539.234.335.232.336.532.633.131.933.430.231.929.831.128.929.928.228.127.53127.336.927.145.427.150.12652.225.258.924.757.824.158.623.958.823.667.523.668.323.364.623.265.423.163.422.963.322.957.923.157.922.953.622.761.122.664.622.660.435.775.52.533.6median 23.6median 58.62.18.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVAIO A12-92993HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
VAIO A12-92993 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (45.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.32 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.41 / 1.1 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 4.4 / 6.5 / 7.1 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 20.2 / 28 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
VAIO A12-92993
8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
 
Average of class Convertible
 
Power Consumption
-29%
-28%
-63%
-38%
4%
7%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
4.4
3.2
27%
3
32%
4.8
-9%
4.9
-11%
1.8
59%
3.03 (1.8 - 4.4, n=3)
31%
4.69 (1 - 23, n=359)
-7%
Idle Average *
6.5
8.7
-34%
7.2
-11%
9
-38%
8.9
-37%
3.8
42%
5.03 (3.8 - 6.5, n=3)
23%
7.88 (1.3 - 32.3, n=359)
-21%
Idle Maximum *
7.1
10.4
-46%
10
-41%
10.5
-48%
11
-55%
7.7
-8%
7.43 (7.1 - 7.7, n=3)
-5%
9.36 (1.8 - 61, n=359)
-32%
Load Average *
20.2
29.2
-45%
37.1
-84%
42.8
-112%
32
-58%
26.9
-33%
21.3 (16.9 - 26.9, n=3)
-5%
26.1 (1.4 - 94, n=357)
-29%
Load Maximum *
28
40.8
-46%
38.2
-36%
57.8
-106%
36
-29%
38.5
-38%
30.1 (23.8 - 38.5, n=3)
-8%
30.7 (6.8 - 117, n=358)
-10%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
8tim 34min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge: 44.17763.1.0)
7tim 11min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3tim 43min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 37min
VAIO A12-92993
8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, 23.4 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, 54.28 Wh
Average of class Convertible
 
Battery Runtime
55%
-22%
42%
43%
161%
51%
Reader / Idle
514
1083
111%
790
54%
781
52%
1882
266%
764 (117 - 1985, n=283)
49%
H.264
223
523
135%
389
74%
444 (206 - 1070, n=105)
99%
WiFi v1.3
431
509
18%
300
-30%
395
-8%
459
6%
852
98%
451 (153 - 1010, n=234)
5%
Load
97
131
35%
84
-13%
83
-14%
137
41%
212
119%
147 (49 - 677, n=272)
52%

För

+ jämförelsevis bra systemprestanda
+ snabb NVMe SSD
+ 512 GB lagring
+ 16 GB RAM
+ fingeravtrycksläsare
+ IR-kamera
+ tangentbordsdocka och aktiv penna ingår
+ bakgrundsbelyst tangentbord
+ LTE-modul

Emot

- dyr
- tangentbordsdockan känns billig
- låg färgrymdstäckning
- skärmen har klen ljusstyrka
- hölje som böjer sig
- litet batteri
- högtalare som är sämre än genomsnittet
- konstig placering av laddaren
- långsam SD-kortläsare
Recension av VAIO A12. Recensionsex från Cyberport.
Recension av VAIO A12. Recensionsex från Cyberport.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

VAIO A12 är något av en gåta. Den är dyr och har många brister, även om VAIO har lyckats bra på en del områden.

Processorn från Y-serien är mer energieffektiv än sin motsvarighet från U-serien men är ändå tillräckligt kraftfull för vanligt kontorsarbete. Men den dualkärnade processorn når sin gräns när det kommer till resursintensiva program. 16 GB RAM känns nästan onödigt här även om vi ändå välkomnar detta och SSD-enheten på 512 GB. Vi hade heller inga generella problem med prestandan och A12 överraskade oss faktiskt med jämförelsevis bra poäng i systemprestandatesterna.

VAIO A12 är helt enkelt för dyr. Den gör inget som inte konkurrenterna kan göra bättre och har dessutom en hel uppsättning egna problem. Leta någon annanstans och spara dina pengar.

A12 ser dessutom ut som om det vore en robust enhet med sin tjocka design och sina lyxiga material, men fallet är det motsatta. Surfplattan böjer sig för lätt för vår smak och tangentbordsdockan sviktar i mitten när man skriver. Vi uppskattar förvisso att VAIO har utrustat A12 med en SD-kortläsare i full storlek, men valet att inte inkludera en USB 2.0-port på en såpass dyr enhet är förbryllande.

Vi hade inte varit så hårda mot A12 om den varit billigare. Vi kunde förlåtit den mörka skärmen, det pyttiga batteriet, de undermåliga högtalarna och de dåligt genomtänkta portarna om den var ett kap, men inte på en enhet som kostar 27.990 kronor. Surface Pro 6 har inga av problemen som A12 lider av och har dessutom en kraftigare CPU samtidigt som den kostar nästan 8.000 kronor mindre.

Sammanfattningsvis så lever A12 definitivt inte upp till våra förväntningar och gör inte mycket för att rättfärdiga sin höga prislapp. Även om VAIO A12 får en respektabel poängsumma på totalt 82% så rekommenderar vi att istället överväga någon av dess konkurrenter: du kommer i så fall få ett lägre pris och en bättre enhet.

VAIO A12-92993 - 05/02/2019 v6
Sebastian Bade

Design
74 / 98 → 76%
Tangentbord
81%
Mus
86%
Anslutningar
63 / 80 → 79%
Vikt
74 / 35-78 → 90%
Batteri
81%
Skärm
86%
Spelprestanda
55 / 68 → 80%
Programprestanda
85 / 87 → 98%
Temperatur
88%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
46 / 91 → 51%
Camera
42 / 85 → 50%
Medel
74%
84%
Convertible - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: VAIO A12 (Core i7-8500Y, 16 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD, FHD) Omvandlingsbar (Sammanfattning)
Sebastian Bade, 2019-05- 6 (Update: 2019-05- 7)