Notebookcheck

Test: Nokia 5.3 - Tunn Android One-mobil (Sammanfattning)

En ring av kameror. Nokia 5.3 har en fyrdubbel kamera, en stor skärm och ett uthålligt batteri till ett relativt lågt pris. Men konkurrensen är hård i det här prisskiktet.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson),
Nokia 5.3
Nokia 5.3 (5 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
6.55 tum 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixlar 268 PPI, Kapacitiv, IPS, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 48 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 512 GB, dedikerad, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerationssensor, Närhetssensor
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.5 x 164.3 x 76.6
Batteri
4000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/1.8, fasjämförande AF, LED-blixt, video @1080p/30fps (kamera 1); 5.0MP, vidvinkelslins (kamera 2); 2.0MP, makrolins (kamera 3); 2.0MP, skärpedjup (kamera 4)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare på den undre kanten, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare, USB-kabel, Headset, SIM-verktyg, 24 Månader Garanti, LTE Cat 4 (150Mbps/​50Mbps); UKW-Radio, fanless
Vikt
185 g, Strömförsörjning: 63 g
Pris
199 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Bewertung
Rating Version
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
76 %7
05/2020
Nokia 5.3
SD 665, Adreno 610
185 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.55"1600x720
81 %7
05/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
77 %7
12/2019
Huawei P smart Pro
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
206 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.59"2340x1080
78 %7
11/2019
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
SD 665, Adreno 610
188 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2280x1080
Nokia 5.3
Nokia 5.3
Nokia 5.3
Nokia 5.3
Nokia 5.3
Nokia 5.3
Nokia 5.3

Storleksjämförelse

165.8 mm 76.7 mm 8.8 mm 209 g164.3 mm 76.6 mm 8.5 mm 185 g163.1 mm 77.2 mm 8.8 mm 206 g158.4 mm 75.8 mm 9.1 mm 188 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
286 (min: 225, max: 321) MBit/s ∼100% +97%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
182 (min: 11, max: 259) MBit/s ∼64% +26%
Nokia 5.3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
145 (min: 20, max: 215) MBit/s ∼51%
Huawei P smart Pro
802.11 b/g/n
42.4 MBit/s ∼15% -71%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
256 (min: 247, max: 263) MBit/s ∼100% +57%
Nokia 5.3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
163 (min: 25, max: 258) MBit/s ∼64%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
152 (min: 1, max: 254) MBit/s ∼59% -7%
Huawei P smart Pro
802.11 b/g/n
51.5 (min: 19, max: 90) MBit/s ∼20% -68%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø145 (20-215)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø163 (25-258)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
ColorChecker
29.8 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
65.8 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
92.1 ∆E
70.7 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
24 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia 5.3: 46.8 ∆E min: 13.55 - max: 92.11 ∆E
ColorChecker
19.3 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
14 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia 5.3: 10.95 ∆E min: 3.33 - max: 21.07 ∆E
477
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 523 cd/m² Medel: 482.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.58 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 523 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1137:1 (Svärta: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.22 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
94.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.226
Nokia 5.3
IPS, 1600x720, 6.55
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Huawei P smart Pro
TFT-LCD (LTPS), 2340x1080, 6.59
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
IPS, 2280x1080, 6.3
Response Times
21%
8%
28%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
56 (28, 28)
44 (21, 23)
21%
51.2 (21.2, 30)
9%
36 (17, 19)
36%
Response Time Black / White *
30 (15, 15)
24 (9, 15)
20%
28 (10, 18)
7%
24 (9, 15)
20%
PWM Frequency
463 (20)
Screen
18%
-3%
11%
Brightness middle
523
622
19%
480
-8%
597
14%
Brightness
482
612
27%
459
-5%
596
24%
Brightness Distribution
86
94
9%
87
1%
93
8%
Black Level *
0.46
0.56
-22%
0.47
-2%
0.52
-13%
Contrast
1137
1111
-2%
1021
-10%
1148
1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.22
3.98
36%
5.7
8%
5.93
5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.56
7.33
31%
11.3
-7%
9.42
11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8
4.5
44%
7.8
2%
5.3
34%
Gamma
2.226 99%
2.206 100%
2.27 97%
2.232 99%
CCT
8856 73%
7361 88%
8813 74%
7632 85%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
114.9
Total Average (Program / Settings)
20% / 18%
3% / -1%
20% / 14%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 28 ms rise
↘ 28 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18037 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1350 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points ∼85% +25%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1356 Points ∼68% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1280 - 1390, n=4)
1351 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (445 - 3531, n=81)
1984 Points ∼100% +47%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
312 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
559 Points ∼99% +79%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
330 Points ∼58% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (309 - 313, n=4)
311 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=81)
567 Points ∼100% +82%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6775 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7673 Points ∼100% +13%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6993 Points ∼91% +3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6534 Points ∼85% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6396 - 6969, n=7)
6675 Points ∼87% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=482)
5782 Points ∼75% -15%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8538 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
9027 Points ∼92% +6%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
9854 Points ∼100% +15%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8186 Points ∼83% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7446 - 9051, n=6)
8335 Points ∼85% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=640)
6325 Points ∼64% -26%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2409 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3256 Points ∼100% +35%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2478 Points ∼76% +3%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2341 Points ∼72% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2298 - 2488, n=7)
2387 Points ∼73% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5766, n=488)
2154 Points ∼66% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
999 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2551 Points ∼100% +155%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
875 Points ∼34% -12%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
981 Points ∼38% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (980 - 999, n=7)
988 Points ∼39% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=488)
2044 Points ∼80% +105%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1148 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2680 Points ∼100% +133%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
991 Points ∼37% -14%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1126 Points ∼42% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1126 - 1151, n=7)
1139 Points ∼43% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=489)
1897 Points ∼71% +65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2396 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3267 Points ∼100% +36%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2496 Points ∼76% +4%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2393 Points ∼73% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2343 - 2493, n=7)
2388 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5721, n=518)
2065 Points ∼63% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1692 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3803 Points ∼100% +125%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1342 Points ∼35% -21%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1670 Points ∼44% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1663 - 1692, n=7)
1673 Points ∼44% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=518)
2719 Points ∼71% +61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1810 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3669 Points ∼100% +103%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1508 Points ∼41% -17%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1790 Points ∼49% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1778 - 1810, n=7)
1792 Points ∼49% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=518)
2285 Points ∼62% +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2476 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3152 Points ∼100% +27%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2456 Points ∼78% -1%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2424 Points ∼77% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2408 - 2493, n=7)
2451 Points ∼78% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=568)
2042 Points ∼65% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
999 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2369 Points ∼100% +137%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
845 Points ∼36% -15%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
979 Points ∼41% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (927 - 999, n=7)
962 Points ∼41% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=568)
1709 Points ∼72% +71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1152 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2507 Points ∼100% +118%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
999 Points ∼40% -13%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1128 Points ∼45% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1076 - 1152, n=7)
1112 Points ∼44% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7305, n=569)
1633 Points ∼65% +42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2482 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3070 Points ∼100% +24%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2487 Points ∼81% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2452 Points ∼80% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2378 - 2507, n=7)
2444 Points ∼80% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=610)
1906 Points ∼62% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1663 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3647 Points ∼100% +119%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1335 Points ∼37% -20%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1634 Points ∼45% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1607 - 1663, n=7)
1633 Points ∼45% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=609)
2237 Points ∼61% +35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1795 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3501 Points ∼100% +95%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1489 Points ∼43% -17%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1765 Points ∼50% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1728 - 1795, n=7)
1762 Points ∼50% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=612)
1929 Points ∼55% +7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20320 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20019 Points ∼89% -1%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
22398 Points ∼100% +10%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18698 Points ∼83% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (18698 - 24652, n=7)
21055 Points ∼94% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 57583, n=758)
15147 Points ∼68% -25%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15403 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
52700 Points ∼100% +242%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2177 Points ∼4% -86%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24992 Points ∼47% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15403 - 25219, n=7)
23590 Points ∼45% +53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=756)
25423 Points ∼48% +65%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24065 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38671 Points ∼100% +61%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
21876 Points ∼57% -9%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23253 Points ∼60% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (23253 - 25046, n=7)
23961 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 110468, n=756)
20067 Points ∼52% -17%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.8 fps ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼99% +25%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2.3 fps ∼21% -74%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.5 fps ∼41% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (4.4 - 9.1, n=7)
6.4 fps ∼58% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=280)
11.1 fps ∼100% +26%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7 fps ∼87% +150%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
4 fps ∼50% +43%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼35% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2.8 - 2.8, n=7)
2.8 fps ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=278)
8.04 fps ∼100% +187%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
14 fps ∼82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +21%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.1 fps ∼36% -56%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps ∼45% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7.2 - 15, n=7)
10.5 fps ∼62% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=284)
16.5 fps ∼97% +18%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.3 fps ∼43%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7 fps ∼36% -16%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.2 fps ∼43% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (8.1 - 8.4, n=7)
8.2 fps ∼43% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=283)
19.2 fps ∼100% +131%
Nokia 5.3Xiaomi Redmi Note 9SHuawei P smart ProMotorola Moto G8 PlusAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
40%
76%
17%
-22%
-25%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
54.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-10%
68.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
14%
52.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
57.6 (11.2 - 74.7, n=120)
-5%
50.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=504)
-17%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
77.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
74.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
76.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
72.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
76.6 (21.1 - 87.2, n=120)
-1%
68.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=504)
-11%
Random Write 4KB
45.2
123.6
173%
156.34
246%
124.9
176%
27.1 (3.4 - 133, n=137)
-40%
32.1 (0.14 - 319, n=847)
-29%
Random Read 4KB
109.1
137
26%
154.29
41%
59.9
-45%
56.1 (11.4 - 149, n=137)
-49%
56.2 (1.59 - 324, n=847)
-48%
Sequential Write 256KB
243.2
214.8
-12%
195.43
-20%
217.4
-11%
174 (40 - 254, n=137)
-28%
119 (2.99 - 911, n=847)
-51%
Sequential Read 256KB
299.5
496.6
66%
821.6
174%
302.5
1%
274 (95.6 - 704, n=137)
-9%
324 (12.1 - 1802, n=847)
8%
Hög belastning
 51.7 °C46.7 °C41.9 °C 
 50.3 °C44.4 °C42 °C 
 48.7 °C44.8 °C42 °C 
Max: 51.7 °C
Medel: 45.8 °C
39.9 °C45.9 °C51.1 °C
40.5 °C46.1 °C49.9 °C
41.4 °C46.2 °C50.7 °C
Max: 51.1 °C
Medel: 45.7 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  42.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.7 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.1 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.4362539.736.7312827.74027.429.55029.835.86325.832.28022.223.610023.422.412521.222.316019.224.820018.931.22501937.831517.242.24001647.350016.755.863018.856.880014.763.8100015.669.212501467160013.966.7200014.462.9250014.761.7315014.359.340001558500015.764.9630015.865.2800015.764.71000016.255.61250015.750.51600015.940.4SPL71.86327.676.1N26.315134.9median 15.8median 56.8Delta1.911.832.430.53531.927.126.4262730.431.225.228.822.722.525.522.120.124.719.235.417.839.417.845.916.149.916.655.715.962.514.365.514.770.414.873.614.37114.165.116.369.114.472.313.868.713.970.414.264.414.559.114.666.41568.115.359.115.751.660.964.571.226.98113.817.725.60.948.4median 15median 64.41.610.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia 5.3Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia 5.3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Nokia 5.3
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh
Huawei P smart Pro
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
4000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
876
1187
36%
757
-14%
980
12%
687 (223 - 2636, n=713)
-22%
Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14tim 36min

För

+ Relativt tunn och lätt
+ Uppdaterad mjukvara
+ Bra batteritid
+ Dedikerad microSD-kortläsare
+ Flexibelt kamerasystem...

Emot

- ...med medioker kvalitet
- Häftig uppvärmning vid belastning
- Endast eMMC Flash
- Varierande datafrekvenser vid WLAN
- Skärmen har en kraftig blå ton

Omdöme - För lite att erbjuda

Recension av Nokia 5.3. Recensionsex från Nokia Germany.
Recension av Nokia 5.3. Recensionsex från Nokia Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Nokia 5.3 känns lite som att den ligger ett år efter. Förra året kunde den fått poäng för ett relativt stort batteri, ett flexibelt kamerasystem och skaplig prestanda för sin klass. Under 2020, och för 2.000 kronor, har den däremot för lite jämfört med konkurrenterna och lider av en del brister som vi inte kan förlåta, inte ens för en enhet för 2.000 kronor:

Den blir alldeles för varm vid belastning, till och med vid rumstemperatur. WLAN-datafrekvenserna varierar och den har långsamt LTE. Skärmen har dessutom en kraftigt blå ton, vilket verkligen inte behöver vara fallet 2020.

Nokia 5.3 har en del svagheter och hamnar därför långt efter konkurrenter med samma pris.

Nokia 5.3 är förvisso lätt och tunn, har skaplig batteritid och prestandan är tillräcklig för enkelt vardagsbruk. Mjukvaran är uppdaterad och tack vare Android One är du säker de kommande två åren i fråga om uppdateringar. Men kameran kan knappt övertyga den heller och det finns helt enkelt så många bättre alternativ från andra tillverkare, så vi finner det svårt att rekommendera Nokias telefon.

I bästa fall, om priset snabbt går ner ordentligt, kan telefonen passa bra för användare med låga krav.

Nokia 5.3 - 07/02/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Design
76%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
94%
Anslutningar
43 / 70 → 62%
Vikt
89%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
82%
Spelprestanda
15 / 64 → 23%
Programprestanda
64 / 86 → 75%
Temperatur
78%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
62 / 90 → 69%
Camera
44%
Medel
70%
76%
Smartphone - Vägt medel
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Nokia 5.3 - Tunn Android One-mobil (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schmitt, 2020-05-30 (Update: 2020-05-30)