Notebookcheck

Test: Nokia 5.1 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Schaar, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 12/02/2018

Instegsenhet med låg uthållighet - Med Nokia 5 talar den Finska tillverkaren till användare som inte har så stora krav. Som vanligt är Nokias design subtil och elegant. Specifikationerna är ganska blygsamma, vilket är varför priset på 2.000 kronor inte direkt är billigt.

Nokia 5.1 (5 Serie)
Processor
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Minne
2048 MB 
, 16
Skärm
5.5 tum 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixlar 439 PPI, kapacitiv, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm, Kortläsare: microSD 256GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, gyroskop, närhetssensor, kompass, fingeravtrycksläsare, microUSB
Nätverk
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM, HSPA, LTE, B1, B2, B3,B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B13, B20, B28, B38, B40, B66; 3G: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8; G2: B2, B3, B5, B8, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.2 x 151.1 x 70.7
Batteri
2970 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Android One, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värde: Huvud (EU): 0,29 W/kg SAR-värde: Kropp (EU): 1,8 W/kg, fanless
Vikt
151 g, Strömförsörjning: 59 g
Pris
189 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=311)
212 MBit/s ∼100% +91%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼57% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
117 MBit/s ∼55% +5%
Nokia 5.1
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
111 (min: 98, max: 119) MBit/s ∼52%
Huawei Y7 2018
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55 MBit/s ∼26% -50%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
43.8 MBit/s ∼21% -61%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=311)
206 MBit/s ∼100% +86%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
119 MBit/s ∼58% +7%
Nokia 5.1
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
111 (min: 87, max: 129) MBit/s ∼54%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
108 MBit/s ∼52% -3%
Huawei Y7 2018
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
56.9 MBit/s ∼28% -49%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
44.3 MBit/s ∼22% -60%
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Nokia 5.1 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø110 (98-119)
Nokia 5.1 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø111 (87-129)
Testbana - Nokia 5.1
Testbana - Nokia 5.1
Testbana - Nokia 5.1
Testbana - Nokia 5.1
Testbana - Nokia 5.1
Testbana - Nokia 5.1
Testbana - Garmin Edge 500
Testbana - Garmin Edge 500
Testbana - Garmin Edge 500
Testbana - Garmin Edge 500
Testbana - Garmin Edge 500
Testbana - Garmin Edge 500
Huvudkamera
Huvudkamera
Huvudkamera
Huvudkamera
Framåtriktad kamera
Framåtriktad kamera

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Testkarta
Testkarta
Förstoring
Färgjämförelse
Smart Lock-menyn
Smart Lock-menyn
10 punkters tryckkänslighet
10 punkters tryckkänslighet
469
cd/m²
437
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 478 cd/m² Medel: 450.8 cd/m² Minimum: 15.62 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 447 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2794:1 (Svärta: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
97.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.31
Nokia 5.1
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.5
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
LCD IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Huawei Y7 2018
IPS, 1440x720, 5.99
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
Super AMOLED, 1480x720, 5.6
Screen
-42%
-15%
-24%
2%
Brightness middle
447
554
24%
512
15%
393
-12%
296
-34%
Brightness
451
538
19%
500
11%
365
-19%
294
-35%
Brightness Distribution
88
91
3%
90
2%
85
-3%
93
6%
Black Level *
0.16
0.61
-281%
0.35
-119%
0.29
-81%
Contrast
2794
908
-68%
1463
-48%
1355
-52%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
4.86
-8%
4.6
-2%
5.28
-17%
2.8
38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.9
8.46
-7%
7.6
4%
9
-14%
9.8
-24%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.5
5.3
-18%
3.8
16%
4.2
7%
1.9
58%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.281 96%
2.11 104%
2.6 85%
2.09 105%
CCT
7517 86%
7770 84%
6952 93%
7086 92%
6398 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 64.94 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 64.94 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 64.94 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8929 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 19.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
57.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 28.4 ms rise
↘ 29.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
2396 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3644 Points ∼81% +52%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2628 Points ∼58% +10%
Huawei Y7 2018
2133 Points ∼47% -11%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (1758 - 2396, n=2)
2077 Points ∼46% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=198)
4508 Points ∼100% +88%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
3225 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4369 Points ∼100% +35%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
4308 Points ∼99% +34%
Huawei Y7 2018
2889 Points ∼66% -10%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
3709 Points ∼85% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (2628 - 3225, n=2)
2927 Points ∼67% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=248)
4298 Points ∼98% +33%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
825 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
880 Points ∼69% +7%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
841 Points ∼66% +2%
Huawei Y7 2018
676 Points ∼53% -18%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
732 Points ∼58% -11%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (616 - 825, n=2)
721 Points ∼57% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=249)
1267 Points ∼100% +54%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
3350 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4828 Points ∼96% +44%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
5035 Points ∼100% +50%
Huawei Y7 2018
3874 Points ∼77% +16%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
3833 Points ∼76% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (3278 - 3405, n=3)
3344 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=256)
4551 Points ∼90% +36%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
4234 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
5716 Points ∼100% +35%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
5656 Points ∼99% +34%
Huawei Y7 2018
4918 Points ∼86% +16%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
4731 Points ∼83% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (3069 - 4685, n=12)
4043 Points ∼71% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4058 - 13531, n=424)
4956 Points ∼87% +17%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
1278 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
1999 Points ∼100% +56%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
1976 Points ∼99% +55%
Huawei Y7 2018
1331 Points ∼67% +4%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
1595 Points ∼80% +25%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (1131 - 1558, n=11)
1258 Points ∼63% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2293 - 4439, n=277)
1709 Points ∼85% +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
406 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
442 Points ∼30% +9%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
420 Points ∼29% +3%
Huawei Y7 2018
306 Points ∼21% -25%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
236 Points ∼16% -42%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (272 - 406, n=11)
350 Points ∼24% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (869 - 8206, n=277)
1465 Points ∼100% +261%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
479 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
535 Points ∼39% +12%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
509 Points ∼37% +6%
Huawei Y7 2018
369 Points ∼27% -23%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
291 Points ∼21% -39%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (328 - 479, n=11)
417 Points ∼31% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (1010 - 5189, n=280)
1360 Points ∼100% +184%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
1248 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
2023 Points ∼100% +62%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
1987 Points ∼98% +59%
Huawei Y7 2018
1306 Points ∼65% +5%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
1631 Points ∼81% +31%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (1119 - 1530, n=8)
1247 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=293)
1686 Points ∼83% +35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
572 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
784 Points ∼38% +37%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
734 Points ∼36% +28%
Huawei Y7 2018
531 Points ∼26% -7%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
385 Points ∼19% -33%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (477 - 579, n=8)
528 Points ∼26% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=293)
2062 Points ∼100% +260%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
650 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
885 Points ∼51% +36%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
854 Points ∼49% +31%
Huawei Y7 2018
612 Points ∼35% -6%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
464 Points ∼27% -29%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (550 - 672, n=8)
606 Points ∼35% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=294)
1729 Points ∼100% +166%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
1379 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
2104 Points ∼100% +53%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2021 Points ∼96% +47%
Huawei Y7 2018
1258 Points ∼60% -9%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
1735 Points ∼82% +26%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (1100 - 1498, n=13)
1244 Points ∼59% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)
1642 Points ∼78% +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
225 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
392 Points ∼33% +74%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
379 Points ∼32% +68%
Huawei Y7 2018
255 Points ∼22% +13%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
202 Points ∼17% -10%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (225 - 359, n=13)
331 Points ∼28% +47%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)
1186 Points ∼100% +427%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
276 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
479 Points ∼42% +74%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
463 Points ∼41% +68%
Huawei Y7 2018
310 Points ∼27% +12%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
251 Points ∼22% -9%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (276 - 425, n=13)
399 Points ∼35% +45%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)
1134 Points ∼100% +311%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
1348 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
2098 Points ∼100% +56%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2016 Points ∼96% +50%
Huawei Y7 2018
1280 Points ∼61% -5%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
1694 Points ∼81% +26%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (1100 - 1516, n=11)
1238 Points ∼59% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=385)
1538 Points ∼73% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
131 Points ∼8%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
743 Points ∼46% +467%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
723 Points ∼44% +452%
Huawei Y7 2018
524 Points ∼32% +300%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
244 Points ∼15% +86%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (131 - 565, n=11)
477 Points ∼29% +264%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=385)
1627 Points ∼100% +1142%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
164 Points ∼12%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
867 Points ∼63% +429%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
843 Points ∼61% +414%
Huawei Y7 2018
603 Points ∼44% +268%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
301 Points ∼22% +84%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (164 - 657, n=11)
550 Points ∼40% +235%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=393)
1384 Points ∼100% +744%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
12452 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
15870 Points ∼100% +27%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
15860 Points ∼100% +27%
Huawei Y7 2018
9153 Points ∼58% -26%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
12566 Points ∼79% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (9970 - 12585, n=13)
11699 Points ∼74% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=540)
12875 Points ∼81% +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
11324 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
13369 Points ∼74% +18%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
13225 Points ∼74% +17%
Huawei Y7 2018
9713 Points ∼54% -14%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
7007 Points ∼39% -38%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (8718 - 11713, n=13)
10526 Points ∼59% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=540)
17971 Points ∼100% +59%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
11557 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
13847 Points ∼92% +20%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
13732 Points ∼91% +19%
Huawei Y7 2018
9583 Points ∼63% -17%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
7771 Points ∼51% -33%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (9279 - 11557, n=13)
10753 Points ∼71% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=541)
15098 Points ∼100% +31%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
19 fps ∼61%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
23 fps ∼73% +21%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
23 fps ∼73% +21%
Huawei Y7 2018
16 fps ∼51% -16%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
12 fps ∼38% -37%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (14 - 19, n=11)
17.2 fps ∼55% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=565)
31.3 fps ∼100% +65%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
17 fps ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
21 fps ∼78% +24%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
19 fps ∼70% +12%
Huawei Y7 2018
27 fps ∼100% +59%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
19 fps ∼70% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (14 - 28, n=11)
18.8 fps ∼70% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=568)
24.9 fps ∼92% +46%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
8.22 fps ∼49%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
9.9 fps ∼59% +20%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
9.8 fps ∼58% +19%
Huawei Y7 2018
7.1 fps ∼42% -14%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
5.4 fps ∼32% -34%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (4.7 - 8.22, n=11)
6.83 fps ∼41% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=487)
16.8 fps ∼100% +104%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
7.7 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
9.4 fps ∼59% +22%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
10 fps ∼63% +30%
Huawei Y7 2018
14 fps ∼88% +82%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
10 fps ∼63% +30%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (4.7 - 15, n=11)
8.18 fps ∼51% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=490)
16 fps ∼100% +108%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
2.8 fps ∼20%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
6.5 fps ∼45% +132%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
6.4 fps ∼45% +129%
Huawei Y7 2018
4.6 fps ∼32% +64%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
3.2 fps ∼22% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (2.5 - 4.8, n=11)
3.85 fps ∼27% +38%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼100% +411%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
5.2 fps ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
6.1 fps ∼44% +17%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
6.9 fps ∼50% +33%
Huawei Y7 2018
10 fps ∼72% +92%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
6.9 fps ∼50% +33%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (2.5 - 11, n=11)
5.66 fps ∼41% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼100% +167%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 59, n=62)
10.2 fps ∼100%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 31, n=62)
6.49 fps ∼100%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
2.3 fps ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
2.3 fps ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5.7 - 59, n=62)
14.4 fps ∼100% +526%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
2.7 fps ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
2.7 fps ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 63, n=61)
15.7 fps ∼100% +481%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
2.7 fps ∼27%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3.5 fps ∼35% +30%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3.5 fps ∼35% +30%
Huawei Y7 2018
2.6 fps ∼26% -4%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
2 fps ∼20% -26%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (1.9 - 2.7, n=11)
2.45 fps ∼25% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)
9.86 fps ∼100% +265%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
2.8 fps ∼31%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3.6 fps ∼40% +29%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3.8 fps ∼43% +36%
Huawei Y7 2018
5.4 fps ∼61% +93%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
4 fps ∼45% +43%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (1.9 - 5.4, n=11)
2.99 fps ∼34% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)
8.89 fps ∼100% +218%
Basemark GPU
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
2.79 (min: 0.93, max: 7.5) fps ∼10%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 606, n=34)
28.8 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
2.03 (min: 0.9, max: 5.03) fps ∼6%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 739, n=32)
36.1 fps ∼100%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
79099 Points ∼67%
Huawei Y7 2018
59421 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
62758 Points ∼53%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
54819 Points ∼46%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=171)
117893 Points ∼100%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
56750 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
68348 Points ∼89% +20%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
63746 Points ∼83% +12%
Huawei Y7 2018
45687 Points ∼60% -19%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
47274 Points ∼62% -17%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (44326 - 56750, n=12)
50016 Points ∼65% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=394)
76519 Points ∼100% +35%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
437 Score ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
Score ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
437 Score ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 5025, n=39)
1773 Score ∼100% +306%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
10 Points ∼1%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
753 Points ∼95% +7430%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
679 Points ∼85% +6690%
Huawei Y7 2018
673 Points ∼85% +6630%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
795 Points ∼100% +7850%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (10 - 771, n=11)
199 Points ∼25% +1890%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=500)
697 Points ∼88% +6870%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
762 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
999 Points ∼58% +31%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
986 Points ∼57% +29%
Huawei Y7 2018
739 Points ∼43% -3%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
534 Points ∼31% -30%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (507 - 762, n=11)
658 Points ∼38% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=500)
1735 Points ∼100% +128%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
144 Points ∼12%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
996 Points ∼80% +592%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
584 Points ∼47% +306%
Huawei Y7 2018
1144 Points ∼92% +694%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
1086 Points ∼87% +654%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (144 - 1076, n=11)
908 Points ∼73% +531%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=500)
1243 Points ∼100% +763%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
2589 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
3154 Points ∼100% +22%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2914 Points ∼92% +13%
Huawei Y7 2018
1906 Points ∼60% -26%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
2208 Points ∼70% -15%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (1868 - 2589, n=11)
2179 Points ∼69% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=500)
2509 Points ∼80% -3%
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 5.1
230 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
1170 Points ∼93% +409%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
1033 Points ∼82% +349%
Huawei Y7 2018
1020 Points ∼81% +343%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
1004 Points ∼80% +337%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (230 - 1043, n=12)
468 Points ∼37% +103%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=504)
1253 Points ∼100% +445%

Legend

 
Nokia 5.1 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G5s Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=423)
36.7 Points ∼100% +63%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)
26.407 Points ∼72% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
25.787 Points ∼70% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (18.9 - 27.5, n=12)
24.8 Points ∼68% +10%
Nokia 5.1 (Chrome 70)
22.522 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (Chrome 67.0.3396.87)
20.745 Points ∼57% -8%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
17.86 Points ∼49% -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=559)
5558 Points ∼100% +38%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
4808 Points ∼87% +19%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)
4456 Points ∼80% +10%
Nokia 5.1 (Chrome 70)
4042 Points ∼73%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (3163 - 4395, n=12)
3867 Points ∼70% -4%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (Chrome 67.0.3396.87)
3721 Points ∼67% -8%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
3363 Points ∼61% -17%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
13541 ms * ∼100% -23%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (Chrome 67.0.3396.87)
11916.4 ms * ∼88% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=579)
11477 ms * ∼85% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (9346 - 23914, n=12)
11346 ms * ∼84% -3%
Nokia 5.1 (Chrome 70)
11043 ms * ∼82%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
9879.9 ms * ∼73% +11%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)
9360.9 ms * ∼69% +15%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 161, n=63)
63.6 Points ∼100% +105%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
38 Points ∼60% +23%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (Chrome 67.0.3396.87)
32 Points ∼50% +3%
Nokia 5.1 (Chrome 70)
31 Points ∼49%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
31 Points ∼49% 0%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
29 Points ∼46% -6%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 362, n=284)
111 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)
109 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (Chrome 67.0.3396.87)
91 Points ∼82%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
82 Points ∼74%
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 (66 - 72, n=3)
69 Points ∼62%

* ... smaller is better

Nokia 5.1Xiaomi Redmi 6 ProMotorola Moto G5s PlusHuawei Y7 2018Samsung Galaxy J6 2018Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
363%
166%
47%
68%
-7%
63%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
55.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
62.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
58.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
61.5
11%
65.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
19%
37.2 (6.38 - 65.4, n=111)
-33%
45.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=323)
-18%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
72.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
15%
79.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
85
17%
81.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
55.9 (10.8 - 87.7, n=111)
-23%
64 (8.2 - 96.5, n=323)
-12%
Random Write 4KB
4.93
72.6
1373%
44.89
811%
9.5
93%
12.37
151%
7.34 (0.49 - 37.9, n=226)
49%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=608)
227%
Random Read 4KB
44.24
66.87
51%
37.94
-14%
38.8
-12%
27.05
-39%
20 (2.49 - 61.7, n=226)
-55%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=608)
-13%
Sequential Write 256KB
25.96
212.87
720%
75.7
192%
71.5
175%
100.54
287%
41.5 (8.74 - 97.6, n=226)
60%
79.8 (2.99 - 246, n=608)
207%
Sequential Read 256KB
264.47
278.66
5%
237.44
-10%
256
-3%
206.49
-22%
158 (9.66 - 294, n=226)
-40%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=608)
-13%
World of Tanks Blitz
0102030405060Tooltip
; low AA:0x AF:0x: Ø54.8 (44-57)
; high AA:0x AF:0x: Ø24 (5-50)
Asphalt 9
0102030Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø22.6 (14-28)
; Standard / low: Ø25.2 (16-29)
Hög belastning
 37.6 °C37.7 °C36.9 °C 
 37.7 °C35.8 °C35.9 °C 
 36.6 °C31.6 °C36.8 °C 
Max: 37.7 °C
Medel: 36.3 °C
35.7 °C35.7 °C35.4 °C
35.9 °C35.3 °C35.4 °C
35.7 °C35.1 °C34.6 °C
Max: 35.9 °C
Medel: 35.4 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  36.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.738.42525253126.820.64026.326.45029.833.36327.425.4802124.910019.524.112518.821.916019.220.420017.625.825016.936.131515.844.14001550.75001558.763014.76480014.868.9100014.671.7125014.372.1160013.471.8200014.473.6250014.473.1315014.872.140001574.4500014.878.1630014.773.980001569.41000014.967.21250015.267.91600015.757.6SPL26.884.8N0.957.3median 15median 67.9Delta1.214.135.24032.943.237.238.531.737.239.636.628.338.227.334.726.934.826.734.72440.120.949.320.95219.556.418.558.617.566.617.568.415.775.715.875.416.673.115.868.515.468.715.568.81669.815.877.41682.916.375.516.378.716.283.316.483.516.467.428.688.91.172.8median 16.4median 68.72.19.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia 5.1Motorola Moto G5s Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia 5.1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Motorola Moto G5s Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.38 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.38 / 2.14 / 2.2 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.21 / 6.81 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nokia 5.1
2970 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3000 mAh
Huawei Y7 2018
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
3000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-11%
23%
9%
22%
4%
17%
Idle Minimum *
1.38
1.3
6%
0.83
40%
0.9
35%
0.85
38%
1.2 (0.72 - 2.6, n=12)
13%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=642)
36%
Idle Average *
2.14
2.1
2%
1.67
22%
1.9
11%
1.51
29%
2.08 (1.41 - 3.21, n=12)
3%
1.721 (0.6 - 6.2, n=641)
20%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
3.7
-68%
1.85
16%
2.3
-5%
1.57
29%
2.29 (1.57 - 3.45, n=12)
-4%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=642)
9%
Load Average *
4.21
4.5
-7%
3.47
18%
4.7
-12%
4.21
-0%
4.51 (2.91 - 7.7, n=12)
-7%
4.04 (0.8 - 10.8, n=636)
4%
Load Maximum *
6.81
6
12%
5.41
21%
5.7
16%
5.88
14%
5.91 (2.93 - 9.16, n=12)
13%
5.76 (1.2 - 14.2, n=636)
15%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
17tim 01min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8tim 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10tim 31min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 55min
Nokia 5.1
2970 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3000 mAh
Huawei Y7 2018
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
75%
91%
24%
47%
Reader / Idle
1021
1765
73%
1496
47%
1305
28%
1495
46%
H.264
631
1214
92%
687
9%
869
38%
WiFi v1.3
523
868
66%
974
86%
624
19%
708
35%
Load
175
293
67%
419
139%
245
40%
297
70%

För

+ tilltalande design
+ fläckfritt hantverk
+ fingeravtrycksläsare
+ högupplöst skärm
+ Android One
+ ingen bloatware
+ stödjer många LTE-band
+ robust
+ responsiv tryckkänslig skärm
+ låg värmeutveckling
+ dual-SIM
+ separat microSD-plats

Emot

- det inkluderade headsetet kunde varit mer ergonomiskt
- oanvänd svart kant under skärmen
- utdaterad SoC
- lite intern lagring
- låg mängd RAM
- dålig batteritid
Recension: Nokia 5.1: Recensionsex från HMD Global Germany and
Recension: Nokia 5.1: Recensionsex från HMD Global Germany and

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Nokia 5.1 är designad som en instegstelefon för användare som vill ha en viss kvalitetsstandard. Det är åtminstone vad det ser ut som och telefonen levererar i det hänseendet. Man får en billig telefon som i alla fall inte förtjänar någon kritik utifrån sett. Designen är tidlös och smidig och den använder material av hög kvalitet på ett tidlöst sätt. Skärmen är stor, tillräckligt ljusstark och har hög upplösning. Den känns också bra att hantera. Även om insidans specifikationer kan se tråkiga ut är de i linje med förhållandet mellan pris och prestanda och kan på så sätt anses vara "att skära ned på rätt saker". Kamerans kvalitet ligger över genomsnittet och passar målgruppens behov. För att sammanfatta: Det är en perfekt instegs-smartphone om du föredrar en gedigen enhet för 500 kronor extra istället för en aningen bättre utrustad importerad mittenskiktsenhet, som eventuellt kan komma med en del egenheter och en svår garantisituation.

Ett perfekt steg in i smartphone-världen

Vårt största klagomål rör den dåligt dimensionerade interna lagringen. Här hade 32 GB gett användaren mer spelrum. Och sen är det förstås batteritiden, som borde ha varit mycket bättre.

Men detta är ändå en utmärkt smartphone för den som i huvudsak vill använda sin telefon till att ringa, skicka meddelanden, kolla epost och då och då kolla upp något på internet eller spela ett enklare spel. Men vi rekommenderar ett köp av ett minneskort och en power bank tillsammans med telefonen.

Nokia 5.1 - 11/16/2018 v6
Florian Schaar

Design
92%
Tangentbord
62 / 75 → 83%
Mus
92%
Anslutningar
44 / 60 → 74%
Vikt
92%
Batteri
91%
Skärm
86%
Spelprestanda
17 / 63 → 26%
Programprestanda
31 / 70 → 44%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
54 / 91 → 59%
Camera
66%
Medel
71%
82%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Nokia 5.1 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schaar, 2018-12- 2 (Update: 2018-12- 2)