Notebookcheck

Test: Lenovo ThinkPad X280 (i5-8250U, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Mini Carbon. Med en fräsch design och ett märkbart tunnare hölje så försöker Lenovo göra sin traditionella ThinkPad X-modell på 12 tum mer attraktiv. I denna recension förklarar vi varför denna metod fungerar bra och vilka funktioner vi saknar trots dom övriga förbättringarna.
Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Andreas Osthoff, Felicitas Krohn (översatt av Daniel Eriksson),
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00 (ThinkPad X280 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i5-8250U 4 x 1.6 - 3.4 GHz, Kaby Lake Refresh
Minne
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2400, fastlött
Skärm
12.5 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 176 PPI, B125HAN02.2, IPS LED, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Kaby Lake-U + iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB 
, M.2 2280, PCIe NVMe x4
Ljudkort
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Anslutningar
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, 1 Dockningsstation, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: MicroSD, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare
Nätverk
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 17.4 x 307.7 x 209.8
Batteri
50 Wh Litiumjon
Camera
Webbkamera: 720p med ThinkShutter-kameraskydd
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2 W Stereo, Tangentbord: Sex raders chiclet med TrackPoint, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, ThinkPad Ethernet Extension Adapter Gen 2 , 36 Månader Garanti
Vikt
1.137 kg, Strömförsörjning: 356 g
Pris
1129 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size comparison

323.5 mm 217.1 mm 15.95 mm 1.1 kg310 mm 218.9 mm 18.9 mm 1.3 kg306 mm 209 mm 20 mm 1.3 kg305.5 mm 208.5 mm 20.3 mm 1.4 kg307.7 mm 209.8 mm 17.4 mm 1.1 kg305 mm 209 mm 18 mm 1.3 kg
Left-hand side: USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-C, Thunderbolt 3, Mini Ethernet, Docking Port, USB 3.0 Type-A, HDMI, Audio combo port
Left-hand side: USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-C, Thunderbolt 3, Mini Ethernet, Docking Port, USB 3.0 Type-A, HDMI, Audio combo port
Right-hand side: USB 3.0 Type-A, Kensington Lock
Right-hand side: USB 3.0 Type-A, Kensington Lock
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
191.2 MB/s ∼100% +149%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77.8 MB/s ∼41% +1%
Dell Latitude 7280
  (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2)
77 MB/s ∼40% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
  (Toshiba Excerie Pro M501)
76.8 MB/s ∼40%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76.59 MB/s ∼40% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8 - 186, n=138)
63.9 MB/s ∼33% -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
62.2 MB/s ∼33% -19%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
223.9 MB/s ∼100% +160%
Dell Latitude 7280
  (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2)
90.92 MB/s ∼41% +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼39% +2%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.77 MB/s ∼39% +2%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86.6 MB/s ∼39% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
  (Toshiba Excerie Pro M501)
86.1 MB/s ∼38%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (17.7 - 251, n=140)
80.3 MB/s ∼36% -7%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
671 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
641 MBit/s ∼96% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
634 MBit/s ∼94%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
633 MBit/s ∼94% 0%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
600 MBit/s ∼89% -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (30.9 - 1658, n=163)
596 MBit/s ∼89% -6%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)
506 MBit/s ∼75% -20%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Subnotebook
  (36 - 1416, n=163)
572 MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
534 MBit/s ∼93% +2%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
530 MBit/s ∼93% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
525 MBit/s ∼92%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
512 MBit/s ∼90% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
511 MBit/s ∼89% -3%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)
474 MBit/s ∼83% -10%
287
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
344
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
313
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
B125HAN02.2
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 346 cd/m² Medel: 312.7 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 82 %
Mitt på batteriet: 336 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1376:1 (Svärta: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6
64.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 41.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
B125HAN02.2, , 1920x1080, 12.5
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Innolux N125HCE-GN1, , 1920x1080, 12.5
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
Chi Mei, , 1920x1080, 12.5
Dell Latitude 7280
AUO236D , , 1920x1080, 12.5
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
B140QAN02.0, , 2560x1440, 14
Dell Latitude 13 7380
LGD0589, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Response Times
-3%
12%
7%
-32%
8%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 (22, 18)
40.8 (21.2, 19.6)
-2%
35 (16, 19)
12%
32.4 (12.4, 20)
19%
59.2 (28.4, 30.8)
-48%
34 (17.2, 16.8)
15%
Response Time Black / White *
29.6 (16.4, 13.2)
30.4 (16.4, 14)
-3%
26 (7, 19)
12%
31.2 (9.2, 22)
-5%
34.4 (16.4, 18)
-16%
29.6 (17.2, 12.4)
-0%
PWM Frequency
26040 (50)
Screen
-21%
-24%
-23%
38%
-20%
Brightness middle
344
283
-18%
326
-5%
310.4
-10%
578
68%
317
-8%
Brightness
313
281
-10%
304
-3%
301
-4%
533
70%
295
-6%
Brightness Distribution
82
94
15%
81
-1%
88
7%
84
2%
87
6%
Black Level *
0.25
0.25
-0%
0.29
-16%
0.32
-28%
0.38
-52%
0.3
-20%
Contrast
1376
1132
-18%
1124
-18%
970
-30%
1521
11%
1057
-23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.7
6.1
-30%
6.49
-38%
5.9
-26%
1.9
60%
6.3
-34%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
19.4
15.4
21%
15.95
18%
21
-8%
3.8
80%
10.4
46%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.2
6
-173%
6.16
-180%
5.1
-132%
3
-36%
7.8
-255%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.05 107%
2.32 95%
2.33 94%
2.14 103%
1.81 122%
CCT
6252 104%
6832 95%
7575 86%
6816 95%
6377 102%
7120 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
41.2
42.26
3%
42
2%
42
2%
88.8
116%
61
48%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
64.1
65.43
2%
65
1%
65
1%
100
56%
92
44%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.8
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-12% / -18%
-6% / -18%
-8% / -18%
3% / 26%
-6% / -16%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17943 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

HWiNFO
HWiNFO
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z caches
CPU-Z caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Core i7-8550U
168 Points ∼100% +16%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
164 Points ∼98% +13%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel Core i7-7600U
161 Points ∼96% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel Core i5-8250U
145 Points ∼86%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (81 - 147, n=95)
141 Points ∼84% -3%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
Intel Core i7-7500U
139 Points ∼83% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼77% -11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (20 - 185, n=317)
120 Points ∼71% -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Core i7-8550U
708 Points ∼100% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Core i7-8550U
648 Points ∼92% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel Core i5-8250U
684 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (320 - 730, n=99)
571 Points ∼81% -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (32 - 1051, n=331)
375 Points ∼53% -45%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel Core i7-7600U
359 Points ∼51% -48%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel Core i7-7600U
351 Points ∼50% -49%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points ∼47% -52%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
Intel Core i7-7500U
329 Points ∼46% -52%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
145 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
684 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
56.59 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Hjälp
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 13 7380
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5060 Points ∼100% +4%
Dell Latitude 7280
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
4957 Points ∼98% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4868 Points ∼96%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
4824 Points ∼95% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4664 Points ∼92% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
4660 Points ∼92% -4%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2699 - 5106, n=58)
4646 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1283 - 5363, n=245)
4096 Points ∼81% -16%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 13 7380
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3872 Points ∼100% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3752 Points ∼97% +5%
Dell Latitude 7280
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
3667 Points ∼95% +3%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
3660 Points ∼95% +2%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2986 - 4458, n=69)
3584 Points ∼93% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
3575 Points ∼92% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3574 Points ∼92%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1027 - 4251, n=274)
3091 Points ∼80% -14%
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3062 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3048 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2613 - 3082, n=66)
2732 Points ∼89% -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (405 - 4728, n=131)
2618 Points ∼85% -14%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2565 Points ∼84% -16%
Productivity
Dell Latitude 13 7380
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6937 Points ∼100% +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6727 Points ∼97% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6529 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3851 - 6653, n=66)
5734 Points ∼83% -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1014 - 7676, n=131)
5339 Points ∼77% -18%
Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7849 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7845 Points ∼100%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7802 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (5855 - 9289, n=66)
7401 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2062 - 9664, n=131)
7041 Points ∼90% -10%
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3905 Points ∼100% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3860 Points ∼99%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3711 Points ∼95% -4%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3407 - 4081, n=66)
3295 Points ∼84% -15%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (743 - 4886, n=134)
3275 Points ∼84% -15%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3574 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4868 poäng
Hjälp
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
Dell Latitude 7280
SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
 
AS SSD
-41%
-29%
-84%
-4%
7%
-10%
Score Total
3774
1513
-60%
2043
-46%
881
-77%
4063
8%
3529
-6%
3966 (2348 - 5316, n=62)
5%
Score Write
1553
569
-63%
675
-57%
220
-86%
690
-56%
1801
16%
1780 (147 - 2992, n=62)
15%
Score Read
1497
630
-58%
927
-38%
432
-71%
2251
50%
1168
-22%
1451 (752 - 2125, n=62)
-3%
Access Time Write *
0.036
0.035
3%
0.029
19%
0.076
-111%
0.028
22%
0.027
25%
0.0834 (0.025 - 2.52, n=62)
-132%
Access Time Read *
0.041
0.062
-51%
0.041
-0%
0.117
-185%
0.045
-10%
0.029
29%
0.0509 (0.029 - 0.103, n=62)
-24%
4K-64 Write
1308.86
375.02
-71%
495.1
-62%
119.14
-91%
484.51
-63%
1529.32
17%
1505 (96.2 - 2716, n=62)
15%
4K-64 Read
1217.77
450.59
-63%
748.88
-39%
354.58
-71%
2072.08
70%
876.34
-28%
1203 (530 - 1823, n=62)
-1%
4K Write
105.25
100.46
-5%
125.27
19%
53.59
-49%
125.07
19%
134.3
28%
112 (1.76 - 146, n=62)
6%
4K Read
47.2
42.16
-11%
38.81
-18%
27.92
-41%
45.59
-3%
52.4
11%
50.5 (31.7 - 61, n=62)
7%
Seq Write
1384.87
931.29
-33%
550.61
-60%
473.31
-66%
805.14
-42%
1376.19
-1%
1637 (487 - 2564, n=62)
18%
Seq Read
2315.96
1374.36
-41%
1393.4
-40%
499.91
-78%
1330.25
-43%
2395.87
3%
1975 (1030 - 2806, n=62)
-15%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Sequential Read: 2535 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1236 MB/s
512K Read: 1751 MB/s
512K Write: 1864 MB/s
4K Read: 59.27 MB/s
4K Write: 129.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 387.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 645.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1901 Points ∼100% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1821 Points ∼96%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 2006, n=215)
1737 Points ∼91% -5%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
1633 Points ∼86% -10%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1515 Points ∼80% -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (230 - 11501, n=403)
1480 Points ∼78% -19%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
1442 Points ∼76% -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1426 Points ∼75% -22%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1283 Points ∼100% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1197 Points ∼93%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (222 - 8093, n=282)
1181 Points ∼92% -1%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1418, n=183)
1146 Points ∼89% -4%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
926 Points ∼72% -23%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
886 Points ∼69% -26%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
819 Points ∼64% -32%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
789 Points ∼61% -34%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
10123 Points ∼100% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9711 Points ∼96%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11436, n=196)
9198 Points ∼91% -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1484 - 30436, n=300)
8284 Points ∼82% -15%
Dell Latitude 13 7380
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
7794 Points ∼77% -20%
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
7618 Points ∼75% -22%
Dell Latitude 7280
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
7032 Points ∼69% -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
6483 Points ∼64% -33%
3DMark 11 Performance
2029 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
8541 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1107 poäng
Hjälp
låg med. hög ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 70.08 36.69 30.85 10.15 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 21.56 fps
Civilization VI (2016) 43.14 15.84 fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
29.2 / 29.2 / 29.2 dB(A)
Hög belastning
39.7 / 39.7 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 29.2 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203232.332.132.132.52533.63029.730.233.73135.633.933.533.933.44032.531.434.13133.25029.428.127.82930.26328.725.926.626.626.28024.725.125.325.426.810025.923.923.924.525.912524.123.122.623.82516022.721.822.422.824.820022.12222.321.721.325020.822.221.121.121.13152120.120.320.421.640022.421.320.218.720.450023.121.720.818.320.263022.620.519.617.62180024.221.720.21720.1100025.523.421.817.420.9125027.324.521.316.321.1160027.124.321.31621.6200029.526.523.41622.2250029.726.723.91623.1315029.727.223.716.422.4400029.32727.416.723500029.928.723.91720.7630027.122.519.517.118.9800023.921.419.217.618.61000022.72018.317.717.91250020.218.518.217.817.61600018.717.917.717.517.6SPL39.737.234.829.233.4N3.12.521.21.9median 24.1median 22.2median 21.3median 17.6median 21.1Delta2.51.61.51.41.233.330.833.133.232.833.332.630.232.135.430.232.630.227.93233.729.230.229.826.428.931.327.929.832.426.328.330.227.332.426.624.625.627.525.226.625.526.326.127.525.725.52625.925.724.625.22624.824.223.625.423.324.823.922.822.622.722.123.923.323.422.422.421.923.323.223.821.922.520.823.225.322.3222219.525.322.321.22120.719.522.322.42119.719.918.422.424.522.520.919.21824.524.422.120.618.317.124.424.821.219.918.21624.825.221.820.317.516.125.226.822.721.318.815.926.826.423.8221915.926.426.523.521.918.315.826.526.62321.417.216.226.627.822.619.416.916.327.826.621.119.217.416.626.624.220.118.617.317.124.222.118.917.717.217.122.119.617.617.517.317.319.61817.417.217.217.11817.417.117.11716.917.437.634.132.530.42937.62.721.71.41.22.7median 24.5median 22.3median 20.9median 18.3median 17.1median 24.51.711.31.71.71.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Hög belastning
 32.4 °C41.2 °C42.7 °C 
 32.1 °C40.4 °C43.2 °C 
 29.2 °C32.7 °C34.1 °C 
Max: 43.2 °C
Medel: 36.4 °C
40.5 °C42.1 °C33.4 °C
35 °C43.1 °C32.3 °C
28.2 °C30.2 °C28.1 °C
Max: 43.1 °C
Medel: 34.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  34.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 20.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.7 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.1 °C / 93.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.5 °C / 83.3 F (-5.6 °C / -10.1 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.735.92528.5323131.136.94029.132.55031.627.76325.8268024.525.610024.127.412522.232.516022.842.720021.750.225020.854.831519.756.640018.6585001864.263017.262.380016.870.110001871.3125016.263.8160015.958.720001662.4250015.961.8315016.161.8400016.461.1500016.966.863001764.4800017.362.11000017.459.41250017.356.71600017.257.3SPL29.176.8N1.239.4median 17.3median 61.1Delta1.64.335.331.434.433.431.731.229.829.328.228.525.9282628.824.627.224.528.62328.222.83121.437.220.147.719.551.818.9501851.317.454.817.353.516.654.616.652.916.453.416.454.216.35416.653.216.958.816.958.917.354.517.350.917.252.217.15029.366.81.221.3median 17.3median 52.22.16hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.28 / 0.46 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 3.11 / 5.01 / 8.11 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 44.6 / 51.7 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5
Dell Latitude 7280
i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5
Dell Latitude 13 7380
i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, 14
Power Consumption
5%
23%
13%
17%
-31%
Idle Minimum *
3.11
3.5
-13%
2.7
13%
4.28
-38%
3.2
-3%
3.8
-22%
Idle Average *
5.01
5.8
-16%
4.8
4%
5.11
-2%
5.5
-10%
8.9
-78%
Idle Maximum *
8.11
7.6
6%
6.6
19%
5.49
32%
6.1
25%
11.9
-47%
Load Average *
44.6
33.2
26%
28.5
36%
29.83
33%
29.5
34%
47.5
-7%
Load Maximum *
51.7
40.4
22%
29
44%
30.05
42%
32
38%
52.5
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
20tim 12min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge)
8tim 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9tim 32min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 59min
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X270-20HMS00T00
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 46 Wh
HP EliteBook 820 G4 Z2V72ET
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 49 Wh
Dell Latitude 7280
i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Dell Latitude 13 7380
i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
-24%
21%
30%
23%
-1%
-16%
Reader / Idle
1212
1023
-16%
1346
11%
1553
28%
1594
32%
1328
10%
633 (87 - 2735, n=561)
-48%
H.264
572
407
-29%
532
-7%
566
-1%
505 (182 - 1312, n=132)
-12%
WiFi v1.3
531
324
-39%
566
7%
682
28%
630
19%
519
-2%
493 (206 - 991, n=262)
-7%
Load
119
104
-13%
205
72%
159
34%
141
18%
106
-11%
123 (40 - 369, n=580)
3%

För

+ högkvalitativt hölje med låg vikt
+ utmärkt ThinkPad I/O
+ förbättrade möjlighet till service
+ matt IPS-skärm med över 300 cd/m²
+ höljet förblir förhållandevis svalt
+ fläkten är oftast tyst
+ Thunderbolt 3 finns anslutet
+ dualkanals-RAM

Emot

- batteriet ej löstagbart
- RJ45 Ethernet saknas
- microSD-kortläsaren är svår att nå
- dålig hantering av CPU-prestandan
- svag genomsnittlig färgrymd
- höljet stort nog för en skärm på 13.3 tum
Lenovo ThinkPad X280, provided by campuspoint
Lenovo ThinkPad X280, provided by campuspoint

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

X280 är troligen den mest utförliga omdesign som gjorts hos den moderna generationen ThinkPad-modeller, en faktor som gör oss entusiastiska över den här enheten. Det är en konceptuellt annorlunda laptop jämfört med ThinkPad X270, vilket kan skrämma bort en del av dess fans. Men totalt sett är X280 en bättre laptop än sin föregångare.

Den viktigaste aspekten av denna nya design är dess hölje, som är betydligt bättre än hos föregångaren. Ändringen i material från glasfiberplast till magnesium och kolfiber har resulterat i reducerad tjocklek och vikt. X280 väger ungefär lika mycket som X1 Carbon. Denna viktreducering har ändrat den anakronism som är X270, en laptop på 12 tum som är tjockare och tyngre än sina syskon på 14 tum. Höljet är inte bara tunnare och lättare utan är också enklare att underhålla då Lenovo har tagit bort dom irriterande och ömtåliga spännena från bottendelen. Dessutom har Lenovo löst dom flesta problem vi upplevde med X270. Fläkten körs mer sällan, enheten blir svalare, energiförbrukningen har förbättrats och skärmen är mer ljusstark. X280 har behållit ThinkPad-traditionen av att ha utmärkt I/O, då den minsta ThinkPad-modellen äntligen stödjer Thunderbolt 3. Bättre än så, till skillnad från sin föregångare så kan X280 dra fördel av sin GPU:s maximala prestanda tack vare dualkanals-RAM.

Men där det finns bra saker finns det också dåliga och dom dåliga väger ibland upp dom bra. Intressant nog så är dom svaga punkterna hos X280 samma saker som vi berömde X270 för. X280 är inte lika flexibel som sin föregångare utan det utökningsbara och löstagbara PowerBridge-batteriet samtidigt som valet att inte ha med en RJ45 Ethernet-port är svårt att förstå ur affärssynpunkt. Att skala ner från en SD- till microSD-plats är förståeligt, men dess placering och möjligheten att komma åt den är det inte. Dess RAM faller också offer för platsbesparingen, då Lenovo har valt RAM som är fastlött på moderkortet snarare än det löstagbara RAM som konkurrenterna fortfarande erbjuder. Ytterligare en nackdel rör hur X280 hanterar CPU-prestandan. Normalt sett så borde klockfrekvensen återgå till sitt ursprungliga värde så fort temperaturen har gått ned efter att en CPU har minskat sin klockfrekvens på grund av höga temperaturer. Detta kanske går att lösa med en BIOS-uppdatering, men det finns fortfarande ingen information om när Lenovo planerar att göra detta. Dessutom stryps CPU:n vid batteridrift, även om det kan vara så att Lenovo gjort detta medvetet. Vi förväntade oss mer än det dåliga färgrymdsgenomsnittet eftersom X280 är en såpass dyr laptop. Detta är en punkt där vi kritiserade X270 och även andra företagslaptops. Till sist så kunde Lenovo troligen ha fått plats med en skärm på 13.3 tum i X280 med tanke på den breda infattning som skärmen på 12 tum har.

Om du kan överleva utan stöd för dedikerad ethernet och ett löstagbart batteri så är X280 ett mycket bättre paket än förra årets modell, vilket är varför vi rekommenderar den.

Vi rekommenderar X280 trots anmärkningarna då den totalt sett är en lyckad subnotebook. X280 är mycket billigare än X1 Carbon 2018 vilket gör campus-versionen till ett attraktivt val för studenter. Det finns också ett antal intressanta modeller från konkurrenterna, såsom Dell Latitude 7290 och HP EliteBook 830 G5, som vi ännu inte har testat. På en del områden slår dessa konkurrenter X280, bland annat genom att inkludera en Ethernet-port och utökningsbar RAM. X280 har, som är fallet med ThinkPad-modeller, oslagbar I/O och är dessutom den lättaste av dessa tre laptops. Även om vi rekommenderar Lenovo ThinkPad X280 så får intresserade köpare göra sina val baserat på sina egna behov och preferenser.

Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00 - 03/02/2018 v6(old)
Benjamin Herzig

Design
92 /  98 → 94%
Tangentbord
89%
Mus
91%
Anslutningar
69 / 80 → 86%
Vikt
73 / 35-78 → 89%
Batteri
91%
Skärm
87%
Spelprestanda
60 / 68 → 88%
Programprestanda
81 / 87 → 93%
Temperatur
91 / 91 → 100%
Ljudnivå
94%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
41 / 85 → 48%
Medel
79%
90%
Subnotebook - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Lenovo ThinkPad X280 (i5-8250U, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Benjamin Herzig, 2018-03-16 (Update: 2018-03-16)
Alex Alderson
Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - News Editor - @aldersonaj