Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Lenovo ThinkPad E14 - Tunn design slår uppgraderingsmöjligheter (Sammanfattning)
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.5 % | 03/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.9 % | 08/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 80.9 % | 02/2020 | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US i5-10210U, GeForce MX250 | 1.2 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83 % | 10/2019 | Dell Latitude 3400 i3-8145U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.7 kg | 18.65 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.9 % | 06/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 308 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1794:1 (Svärta: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.6
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
59.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.31% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.05
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE NV140FHM-N48, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE Lenovo NV140FHM-N49, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Chi Mei N140HCE-EN2, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Dell Latitude 3400 BOE NV14N4H, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE NE140FHM-N61, IGZO IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 58% | 0% | 63% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.31 | 39.85 -1% | 64.2 59% | 40.68 1% | 69.2 72% |
| sRGB Coverage | 60 | 58.6 -2% | 94.8 58% | 59.3 -1% | 92.3 54% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.65 | 41.18 -1% | 65.4 57% | 42.03 1% | 67.6 62% |
| Response Times | 3% | 645% | -4% | 14% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 52 ? | 48.4 ? 7% | 39.2 ? 25% | 44 ? 15% | 71.2 ? -37% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 39.2 ? | 38.4 ? 2% | 35.6 ? 9% | 42 ? -7% | 44.8 ? -14% |
| PWM Frequency | 1250 ? | 1250 ? 0% | 25000 ? 1900% | 1000 ? -20% | 2427 ? 94% |
| Screen | -1% | 31% | -16% | 20% | |
| Brightness middle | 305 | 305 0% | 324.1 6% | 240 -21% | 428 40% |
| Brightness | 292 | 295 1% | 301 3% | 227 -22% | 409 40% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 90 1% | 87 -2% | 79 -11% | 91 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.17 | 0.23 -35% | 0.22 -29% | 0.48 -182% | 0.29 -71% |
| Contrast | 1794 | 1326 -26% | 1473 -18% | 500 -72% | 1476 -18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.9 | 5.3 10% | 1.63 72% | 4.2 29% | 4.6 22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.4 | 18.9 -3% | 4.25 77% | 7.16 61% | 8.2 55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.6 | 5 -9% | 1.42 69% | 2 57% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 2.3 48% | 2.2 50% | 1.75 60% | 5.4 -23% |
| Gamma | 2.05 107% | 2.09 105% | 2.26 97% | 2.36 93% | 2.09 105% |
| CCT | 6921 94% | 6246 104% | 6887 94% | 6387 102% | 7562 86% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38.2 | 37.7 -1% | 60.2 58% | 38 -1% | 60 57% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59.6 | 58.2 -2% | 95 59% | 59 -1% | 92.2 55% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 0% /
-1% | 245% /
144% | -7% /
-11% | 32% /
26% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1250 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1250 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3402 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5001 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3901 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A | Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Dell Latitude 3400 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE Toshiba KXG5AZNV256G | Average SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -9% | -2% | 9% | 24% | -9% | |
| Write 4K | 121.9 | 110.7 -9% | 107.7 -12% | 107.9 -11% | 119.9 -2% | 110 ? -10% |
| Read 4K | 42.66 | 41.02 -4% | 39.73 -7% | 40.27 -6% | 39.94 -6% | 40.6 ? -5% |
| Write Seq | 628 | 757 21% | 926 47% | 1253 100% | 1334 112% | 677 ? 8% |
| Read Seq | 1193 | 1037 -13% | 1014 -15% | 1298 9% | 1357 14% | 1104 ? -7% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 590 | 359 -39% | 343.6 -42% | 415 -30% | 311.2 -47% | 438 ? -26% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 414.5 | 402.4 -3% | 499.1 20% | 313.3 -24% | 400.6 -3% | 338 ? -18% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 866 | 833 -4% | 1033 19% | 1297 50% | 1642 90% | 860 ? -1% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2078 | 1635 -21% | 1604 -23% | 1728 -17% | 2778 34% | 1786 ? -14% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1938 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8057 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1072 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 59.8 | 33.23 | 27.38 | 8.74 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 68.7 | 40.7 | 19.3 | 17.1 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 20.6 | |||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 10.6 | 9.02 | 8.8 | |
| Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 23.4 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 29.2 / 29.2 / 29.2 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 29.5 / 29.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.2 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-2.3 °C / -4.1 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.47 / 0.77 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 3.01 / 6.32 / 8.78 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
32.5 / 45.5 Watt |
   
| |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Dell Latitude 3400 i3-8145U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KXG5AZNV256G, IGZO IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | -32% | 12% | 5% | -10% | -23% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.01 | 2.76 8% | 4.2 -40% | 2.4 20% | 2.34 22% | 3.81 ? -27% | 4.29 ? -43% |
| Idle Average * | 6.32 | 5.96 6% | 5.9 7% | 4.9 22% | 5.22 17% | 6.94 ? -10% | 7.33 ? -16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.78 | 6.57 25% | 7.2 18% | 7.4 16% | 8.82 -0% | 8.75 ? -0% | 9.15 ? -4% |
| Load Average * | 32.5 | 28.2 13% | 63.4 -95% | 31 5% | 35.8 -10% | 35 ? -8% | 41.1 ? -26% |
| Load Maximum * | 45.5 | 43.6 4% | 67.4 -48% | 47 -3% | 47.3 -4% | 47.5 ? -4% | 58 ? -27% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53.5 |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Dell Latitude 3400 i3-8145U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 8% | 4% | 28% | 15% | 16% | |
| H.264 | 617 | 687 11% | 677 10% | 699 ? 13% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 507 | 485 -4% | 515 2% | 572 13% | 584 15% | 595 ? 17% |
| Load | 100 | 117 17% | 105 5% | 161 61% | 117.9 ? 18% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1063 | 986 | 1436 ? |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Lenovo fortsätter att utveckla sin E-serie med nya ThinkPad E14: Det tunnare chassit inspireras till stor del av designen från den äldre ThinkPad E490 och har därför också många av dess styrkor. En är de utmärkta ThinkPad-inmatningsenheterna. Andra inkluderar bra batteritid och låg värme/ljudnivå, även vid belastning. ThinkPad E14 går också fortfarande att uppgradera, särskilt när det gäller lagringen. Och tack vare att mer aluminium används känns den också mer högkvalitativ.
Tyvärr tar den också några steg bakåt: microSD-kortplatsen har tagits bort utan någon ersättning. Möjligheten att uppgradera RAM är också begränsad: Istället för två SO-DIMM platser och upp till 64 GB minne i dubbla kanaler har E14 bara en enda RAM-plats med stöd för upp till 32 GB RAM i enkel kanal. Andra brister inkluderar en kort garanti på 12 månader och en skärm med lågt färgomfång. Det knarrande ljudet som uppstår från gångjärnsområdet när man stänger skärmen är en aning oroväckande – här känns hantverket verkligen inte perfekt.
Egentligen inte bättre än sin föregångare: Lenovo ThinkPad E14 tar bort en del funktioner i onödan.
Totalt sett kan vi fortfarande rekommendera Lenovo ThinkPad E14 då den trots sina brister är en gedigen laptop för den med liten budget – men vi tycker inte den är lika tilltalande som sin föregångare, ThinkPad E490, eftersom en del funktioner saknas.
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
-
03/03/2020 v7
Benjamin Herzig
Pricecompare
