Test: Huawei P Smart 2021 - Är Huaweis första "hemmagjorda" SoC bra? (Sammanfattning)

Name: Huawei P Smart 2021
Brand: Huawei

Lång väg kvar... I och med Kirin 710A har Huawei flyttat chip-produktionen till sitt hemland Kina för att kunna bli oberoende av USA. Men den här milstolpen avslöjar också Huaweis dilemma.

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 12/10/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei P Smart 2021

Processor

HiSilicon Kirin 710A 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53

Grafikkort

ARM Mali-G51 MP4

Minne

4 GB

Skärm

6.67 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 395 PPI, Tryckkänslig, kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: ja, 60 Hz

Hårddisk

128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB

, 109 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD-kort upp till 512 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Närhetssensor, Kompass, USB-C, OTG, FM-radio

Nätverk

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 5.1, LTE: FDD: B1 / B3 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B20 / B28, TDD:B38 / B40 / B41); UMTS: (B1 / B2 / B5 / B8); GSM: (B2 / B3 / B5 / B8), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.26 x 165.65 x 76.88

Batteri

5000 mAh Litiumpolymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operativsystem

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.8, 26mm, 1/2.0", 0.8µm) + 8 MP (f/2.4, 120˚) + 2 MP (f/2.4) + 2 MP (f/2.4), camera2 api: full
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0)

Övrigt

Högtalare: Monohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Headset, Laddare, USB-kabel, EMUI 10.1, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: 0.85 W/kg huvud, 1.15 W/kg kropp, Widevine L3, fanless

Vikt

206 g, Strömförsörjning: 56 g

Pris

230 Kr

Länkar

Huawei hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Testgrupp

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
78.4 %	12/2020	Huawei P Smart 2021 Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4	206 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
81.8 %	09/2020	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC SD 732G, Adreno 618	215 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
75.4 %	11/2020	Samsung Galaxy A20s SD 450, Adreno 506	183 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	1560x720
82.9 %	06/2020	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618	209 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
79.8 %	01/2020	Oppo A91 Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3	172 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.40"	2400x1080
79.8 %	10/2020	Motorola Moto G9 Plus SD 730G, Adreno 618	223 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.81"	2400x1080
76.6 %	06/2020	Huawei P Smart 2020 Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4	163 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.21"	2340x1080

Storleksjämförelse

Motorola Moto G9 Plus Huawei P Smart 2021 Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Samsung Galaxy A20s Oppo A91 DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	633 (589^min - 676^max) MBit/s +845%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	551 (465^min - 583^max) MBit/s +722%
Oppo A91 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	332 (312^min - 337^max) MBit/s +396%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	326 (309^min - 343^max) MBit/s +387%
Huawei P Smart 2021 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB eMMC Flash	67 (33^min - 100^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A20s Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	28.3 (12^min - 44^max) MBit/s -58%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	636 (500^min - 675^max) MBit/s +806%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	619 (283^min - 670^max) MBit/s +782%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s +436%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	309 (140^min - 360^max) MBit/s +340%
Oppo A91 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	294 (80^min - 338^max) MBit/s +319%
Huawei P Smart 2021 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB eMMC Flash	70.2 (68^min - 73^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A20s Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	41.6 (28^min - 58^max) MBit/s -41%

Huawei P Smart 2021; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø70 (68-73)

Huawei P Smart 2021; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø67.1 (33-100)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angle Low Light Wide-angle Ultrawide-angle 5x-Zoom

click to load images

Huawei P Smart 2021

Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

LG Velvet

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Huawei P Smart 2021

Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

LG Velvet

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Huawei P Smart 2021

Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

LG Velvet

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Huawei P Smart 2021

Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

LG Velvet

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Huawei P Smart 2021

Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

LG Velvet

Canon EOS 70D

ColorChecker Huawei P Smart 2021: 8.59 ∆E min: 1.19 - max: 17.18 ∆E


442 cd/m²	444 cd/m²	382 cd/m²
449 cd/m²	455 cd/m²	384 cd/m²
447 cd/m²	439 cd/m²	389 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 455 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 425.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.21 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 84 %
Mitt på batteriet: 455 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1034:1 (Svärta: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22

	Huawei P Smart 2021 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67	Samsung Galaxy A20s IPS, 1560x720, 6.50	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67	Oppo A91 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40	Motorola Moto G9 Plus LTPS, 2400x1080, 6.81
Screen		-6%	-61%	16%	-114%	-49%
Brightness middle	455	623 37%	384 -16%	610 34%	594 31%	390 -14%
Brightness	426	600 41%	367 -14%	579 36%	613 44%	377 -12%
Brightness Distribution	84	93 11%	87 4%	92 10%	89 6%	93 11%
Black Level *	0.44	0.54 -23%	0.42 5%	0.37 16%		0.66 -50%
Contrast	1034	1154 12%	914 -12%	1649 59%		591 -43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.6	1.8 -13%	4.43 -177%	1.8 -13%	6.1 -281%	3.39 -112%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.9	4.7 -62%	7.34 -153%	3 -3%	10.6 -266%	5.22 -80%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.2	3.3 -50%	4.9 -123%	2.5 -14%	7 -218%	4.3 -95%
Gamma	2.22 ^99%	2.26 ^97%	2.308 ^95%	2.31 ^95%	2.28 ^96%	2.506 ^88%
CCT	6868 ^95%	6712 ^97%	7671 ^85%	6864 ^95%	7370 ^88%	6033 ^108%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.4 ms rise
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19.6 ms rise
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	299 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	330 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	567 Points +90%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	159 Points -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	569 Points +90%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	320 Points +7%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	282 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	551 Points +84%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (296 - 299, n=3)	297 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=218, last 2 years)	916 Points +206%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1332 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1356 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1787 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	902 Points -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1771 Points +33%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1475 Points +11%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1430 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	1786 Points +34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1256 - 1332, n=3)	1300 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=218, last 2 years)	3004 Points +126%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1017 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1090 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	Points -100%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	987 Points -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1017 - 1036, n=3)	1027 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (79 - 9992, n=86, last 2 years)	4246 Points +318%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1045 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1291 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	259 Points -75%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	1113 Points +7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1044 - 1050, n=3)	1046 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (434 - 10711, n=78, last 2 years)	4051 Points +288%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1422 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1554 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2638 Points +86%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	778 Points -45%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	2556 Points +80%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1422 - 1458, n=2)	1440 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)	5228 Points +268%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5211 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	5443 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	7130 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3998 Points -23%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	6987 Points +34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (5211 - 5252, n=2)	5232 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)	14045 Points +170%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	4766 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	3896 Points -18%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	8962 Points +88%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3349 Points -30%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	8411 Points +76%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (4766 - 4856, n=2)	4811 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)	10872 Points +128%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	8211 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	9854 Points +20%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	8773 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	5836 Points -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	9091 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	9956 Points +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (7991 - 8211, n=2)	8101 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +84%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7789 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	6993 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	8101 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	4493 Points -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	7829 Points +1%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	8185 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	7737 Points -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (6287 - 7789, n=2)	7038 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +40%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	19601 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	21876 Points +12%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	40955 Points +109%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	13203 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	38315 Points +95%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	23447 Points +20%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	39572 Points +102%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (19493 - 19601, n=2)	19547 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	23224 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2177 Points -91%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	56640 Points +144%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	12736 Points -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	51789 Points +123%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	23159 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	53182 Points +129%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (22844 - 23224, n=2)	23034 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	12601 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	22398 Points +78%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	20797 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	15273 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	20054 Points +59%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	24514 Points +95%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	20382 Points +62%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (12601 - 12880, n=2)	12741 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1525 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1489 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3784 Points +148%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	825 Points -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3534 Points +132%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1899 Points +25%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3556 Points +133%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1445 - 1525, n=3)	1475 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points +147%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1493 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1335 Points -11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3917 Points +162%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	701 Points -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3620 Points +142%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1767 Points +18%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3678 Points +146%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1326 - 1493, n=3)	1384 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points +180%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2332 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2487 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3382 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1672 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3263 Points +40%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2568 Points +10%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3349 Points +44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2191 - 2332, n=3)	2260 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1573 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1508 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3918 Points +149%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	817 Points -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3645 Points +132%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1885 Points +20%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3704 Points +135%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1501 - 1573, n=3)	1527 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points +494%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1452 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1342 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	4086 Points +181%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	702 Points -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3785 Points +161%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1747 Points +20%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3773 Points +160%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1356 - 1452, n=3)	1389 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points +1026%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2511 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2496 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3425 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1661 Points -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3226 Points +28%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2606 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3352 Points +33%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2441 - 2511, n=3)	2464 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points +76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1099 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	999 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2713 Points +147%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	438 Points -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2499 Points +127%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1276 Points +16%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	2489 Points +126%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1082 - 1099, n=3)	1089 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=104, last 2 years)	2767 Points +152%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	951 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	845 Points -11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2559 Points +169%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	382 Points -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2356 Points +148%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1117 Points +17%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	2293 Points +141%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (945 - 955, n=3)	950 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=104, last 2 years)	2765 Points +191%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2338 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2456 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3436 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1702 Points -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3170 Points +36%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2550 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3328 Points +42%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2203 - 2338, n=3)	2259 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=104, last 2 years)	3168 Points +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1123 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	991 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2865 Points +155%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	488 Points -57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2667 Points +137%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1265 Points +13%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	2701 Points +141%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1123 - 1136, n=3)	1128 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=181, last 2 years)	6766 Points +502%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	988 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	875 Points -11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2735 Points +177%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	403 Points -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2539 Points +157%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1102 Points +12%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	2471 Points +150%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (981 - 988, n=3)	985 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=180, last 2 years)	9771 Points +889%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2501 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2478 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3438 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1729 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3236 Points +29%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2621 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3391 Points +36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2365 - 2501, n=3)	2426 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=180, last 2 years)	4232 Points +69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1066 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2506 Points +135%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	489 Points -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2340 Points +120%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1248 Points +17%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	2310 Points +117%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1052 - 1066, n=3)	1059 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6439, n=98, last 2 years)	2684 Points +152%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	911 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2427 Points +166%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	402 Points -56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2250 Points +147%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1103 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	2199 Points +141%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (911 - 954, n=3)	926 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=98, last 2 years)	2866 Points +215%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2298 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2827 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	2076 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2721 Points +18%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2304 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	2775 Points +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (230 - 2298, n=3)	1584 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 3525, n=98, last 2 years)	2678 Points +17%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	36 fps
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	35 fps -3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps +67%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	33 fps -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps +67%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	57 fps +58%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (36 - 38, n=2)	37 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)	84.6 fps +135%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	40 fps
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	39 fps -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	91 fps +128%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	22 fps -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	85 fps +113%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	86 fps +115%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (40 - 41, n=2)	40.5 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)	247 fps +518%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	15 fps
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	14 fps -7%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	34 fps +127%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	17 fps +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	39 fps +160%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	38 fps +153%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (15 - 20, n=2)	17.5 fps +17%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)	72.2 fps +381%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	19 fps
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	18 fps -5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	45 fps +137%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	9.4 fps -51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps +116%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	42 fps +121%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (19 - 28, n=2)	23.5 fps +24%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)	140.6 fps +640%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7.9 fps
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	12 fps +52%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	28 fps +254%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	13 fps +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	29 fps +267%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	27 fps +242%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (7.9 - 14, n=2)	11 fps +39%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)	60.9 fps +671%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	13 fps
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	14 fps +8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	33 fps +154%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	6.9 fps -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps +131%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	30 fps +131%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (13 - 16, n=2)	14.5 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)	99 fps +662%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7.1 fps
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	6.4 fps -10%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps +139%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	6.6 fps -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps +139%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	16 fps +125%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (7.1 - 8.5, n=2)	7.8 fps +10%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)	43.4 fps +511%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	8.1 fps
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	7.7 fps -5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	19 fps +135%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3.6 fps -56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps +122%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	17 fps +110%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (8.1 - 9.1, n=2)	8.6 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)	59.9 fps +640%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.7 fps
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	6.1 fps -9%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps +169%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	6.3 fps -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps +154%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	7.5 fps +12%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	16 fps +139%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (6.7 - 7.6, n=3)	7.03 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=225, last 2 years)	44.2 fps +560%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7.6 fps
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	7 fps -8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	20 fps +163%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3.6 fps -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps +137%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	8.8 fps +16%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	18 fps +137%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (4.3 - 7.6, n=3)	6.5 fps -14%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=225, last 2 years)	64.5 fps +749%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	4.4 fps
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2.3 fps -48%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps +150%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	3.8 fps -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps +150%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	4.5 fps +2%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	10 fps +127%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (4.4 - 4.8, n=3)	4.57 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=225, last 2 years)	32.9 fps +648%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2.8 fps
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	4 fps +43%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	7.5 fps +168%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1.4 fps -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6.9 fps +146%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2.9 fps +4%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	6.3 fps +125%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2.8 - 2.9, n=3)	2.87 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=225, last 2 years)	25.7 fps +818%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	169704 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	194475 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	279048 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	90185 Points -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	271934 Points +60%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	251673 Points +48%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A ()	169704 Points 0%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1221 Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	2373 Score +94%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A ()	1221 Score 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=12, last 2 years)	5985 Score +390%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2173 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2258 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3477 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1249 Points -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3444 Points +58%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3412 Points +57%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2013 - 2173, n=2)	2093 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)	5745 Points +164%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	4934 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	5134 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	6542 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	2783 Points -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6856 Points +39%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	6612 Points +34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (4845 - 4934, n=2)	4890 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)	9678 Points +96%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2772 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	2913 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	4041 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	1182 Points -57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	4452 Points +61%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	4029 Points +45%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (2772 - 2896, n=2)	2834 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)	6250 Points +125%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1572 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1476 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	3960 Points +152%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	984 Points -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3757 Points +139%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	3984 Points +153%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1452 - 1572, n=2)	1512 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)	14101 Points +797%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1023 Points
Huawei P smart Pro HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144	1179 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144	1395 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy A20s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072	981 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1226 Points +20%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096	1347 Points +32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (956 - 1023, n=2)	990 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)	1494 Points +46%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points +252%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	52.6 Points +75%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)	50.6 Points +68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	47.9 Points +59%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (30.1 - 30.3, n=2)	30.2 Points 0%
Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11)	30.13 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)	15.98 Points -47%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	104.3 Points +115%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	90.6 Points +87%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	86.8 Points +79%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)	86.5 Points +78%
Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11)	48.47 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (48.1 - 48.5, n=2)	48.3 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)	22.44 Points -54%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +295%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	45.2 runs/min +67%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	43.9 runs/min +62%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)	43.3 runs/min +60%
Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11)	27.1 runs/min
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (25.6 - 27.1, n=2)	26.4 runs/min -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20s	12.4 runs/min -54%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +142%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	72 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	71 Points +29%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)	68 Points +24%
Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11)	55 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (55 - 55, n=2)	55 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)	29 Points -47%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=212, last 2 years)	33588 Points +277%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	17398 Points +95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	17265 Points +94%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)	16729 Points +88%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (8911 - 9996, n=2)	9454 Points +6%
Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11)	8911 Points
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)	3982 Points -55%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)	11620 ms * -163%
Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11)	4411 ms *
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (4122 - 4411, n=2)	4267 ms * +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	2850 ms * +35%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)	2783 ms * +37%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)	2673 ms * +39%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +64%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei P Smart 2021	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC	Samsung Galaxy A20s	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro	Oppo A91	Motorola Moto G9 Plus	Average 128 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		24%	-24%	24%	10%	28%	-6%	341%
Sequential Read 256KB	308.1	506 64%	298.2 -3%	498.1 62%	505 64%	489.4 59%	283 ?(106.7 - 511, n=74) -8%	1502 ?(226 - 4512, n=216, last 2 years) 388%
Sequential Write 256KB	183.3	173.1 -6%	90.6 -51%	171.1 -7%	185.3 1%	186.2 2%	193 ?(72.3 - 314, n=74) 5%	1111 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=216, last 2 years) 506%
Random Read 4KB	92.4	123.4 34%	75.9 -18%	122.6 33%	145.6 58%	134.8 46%	82.4 ?(8.63 - 247, n=74) -11%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=216, last 2 years) 167%
Random Write 4KB	67.2	112.6 68%	12.95 -81%	112.9 68%	28.55 -58%	98.1 46%	54 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=74) -20%	271 ?(13 - 709, n=216, last 2 years) 303%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	76.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	75.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -1%	82.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 8%	76.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	77.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 1%	85.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 12%	78.1 ?(29.2 - 153.8, n=34) 2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	64.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	55.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -14%	65.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	54.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -15%	60.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -7%	65.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	61.8 ?(26.1 - 81.9, n=34) -4%

PUBG mobile

Huawei P Smart 2021; Smooth: Ø30 (28-31)

Huawei P Smart 2021; Balanced: Ø29.9 (26-31)

Huawei P Smart 2021; HD: Ø29.8 (24-31)

Armajet

Huawei P Smart 2021: Ø59.2 (52-60)

Real Racing 3

Huawei P Smart 2021: Ø59.1 (38-60)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


33.3 °C	33.7 °C	31 °C
33.2 °C	31.6 °C	32 °C
33.3 °C	32.1 °C	32.1 °C

Max: 33.7 °C
Medel: 32.5 °C


29.4 °C	29.1 °C	30.6 °C
29.2 °C	29.8 °C	32.6 °C
29.4 °C	30.5 °C	32.2 °C

Max: 32.6 °C
Medel: 30.3 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 26.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei P Smart 2021 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.02 / 0.28 Watt
Låg belastning	0.75 / 2.2 / 2.26 Watt
Hög belastning	5.05 / 8.85 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Huawei P Smart 2021 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A20s 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh	Oppo A91 4025 mAh	Motorola Moto G9 Plus 5000 mAh	Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-7%	-1%	11%	24%	6%	-28%	8%
Idle Minimum *	0.75	0.93 -24%	0.9 -20%	0.75 -0%	0.82 -9%	0.8 -7%	1.175 ?(0.75 - 1.6, n=2) -57%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -20%
Idle Average *	2.2	2.47 -12%	1.8 18%	2.19 -0%	1.73 21%	1.7 23%	2.5 ?(2.2 - 2.8, n=2) -14%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 34%
Idle Maximum *	2.26	2.51 -11%	2.7 -19%	2.24 1%	1.75 23%	2.2 3%	2.88 ?(2.26 - 3.5, n=2) -27%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 28%
Load Average *	5.05	5.62 -11%	5.2 -3%	3.88 23%	2.33 54%	5.3 -5%	6.48 ?(5.05 - 7.9, n=2) -28%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -10%
Load Maximum *	8.85	6.93 22%	7.1 20%	5.97 33%	5.97 33%	7.4 16%	10.2 ?(8.85 - 11.5, n=2) -15%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) 6%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid


WiFi Websurfing		12tim 38min

	Huawei P Smart 2021 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A20s 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh	Oppo A91 4025 mAh	Motorola Moto G9 Plus 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	758	1116 47%	812 7%	1175 55%	605 -20%	968 28%

För

+ Bra IPS-skärm

+ Låg värmeutveckling

+ Gedigen batteritid med snabbladdning på 22.5 Watt

+ Tredubbel kortplats

Emot

- Saknar GMS

- Saknar NFC

- Långsamt WLAN

- Skärmens ljusstyrka

- Långsam lagring

- Långsam SoC

- Widevine L3

Omdöme för P Smart 2021: Huawei hamnar inte bara efter i fråga om appar

Recension av Huawei P Smart 2021. Recensionsex från Huawei Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Huaweis mittenskiktstelefon har en del grundläggande förtjänster, såsom bra hantverk, en skaplig IPS-skärm och tillfredsställande batteritid i kombination med snabb laddning. Men inte mer än så. I synnerhet är prestandan från det nya Kirin 710A chippet helt enkelt för låg för en smartphone som har ett rekommenderat pris på 2.300 kronor.

Generellt kan P Smart 2021 inte riktigt stå ut från mängden av kraftfulla konkurrenter, och på de områden den står ut är det åt det negativa hållet. I synnerhet ger Poco X3 NFC eller Redmi Note 9 Pro betydligt mer smartphoneförmåga till ett liknande pris.

För 1.900 kronor, som den för tillfället kostar, borde man egentligen inte välja P Smart 2021. Huaweis direkta konkurrenter är Redmi 9 och Galaxy A20s, som båda går att få tag på för ca 1.400 kronor.

Och även om vi bortser från detta faktum gör avsaknaden av Googles Tjänster att det är svårt att rekommendera Huaweis smartphone, även om den hade lyckats gå om de andra tillverkarna i fråga om generell förmåga.

Huawei P Smart 2021 - 2020-11-27 11/27/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Design

86%

Tangentbord

67 / 75 → 89%

Mus

90%

Anslutningar

44 / 70 → 63%

Vikt

88%

Batteri

89%

Skärm

88%

Spelprestanda

13 / 64 → 20%

Programprestanda

60 / 86 → 70%

Temperatur

93%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

73 / 90 → 81%

Camera

59%

Medel

73%

78%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 508 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Huawei P Smart 2021 - Är Huaweis första "hemmagjorda" SoC bra? (Sammanfattning)

Marcus Herbrich, 2020-12-10 (Update: 2020-12-10)

Test: Huawei P Smart 2021 - Är Huaweis första "hemmagjorda" SoC bra? (Sammanfattning)

Testgrupp

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG mobile

Armajet

Real Racing 3

Huawei P Smart 2021 audio analysis

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC audio analysis

För

Emot

Omdöme för P Smart 2021: Huawei hamnar inte bara efter i fråga om appar

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare