Test: Huawei P Smart 2021 - Är Huaweis första "hemmagjorda" SoC bra? (Sammanfattning)
Huawei P Smart 2021
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 710A 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Minne
4096 MB
Skärm
6.67 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 395 PPI, Tryckkänslig, kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB
, 109 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD-kort upp till 512 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Närhetssensor, Kompass, USB-C, OTG, FM-radio
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5.1, LTE: FDD: B1 / B3 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B20 / B28, TDD:B38 / B40 / B41); UMTS: (B1 / B2 / B5 / B8); GSM: (B2 / B3 / B5 / B8), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.26 x 165.65 x 76.88
Batteri
5000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.8, 26mm, 1/2.0", 0.8µm) + 8 MP (f/2.4, 120˚) + 2 MP (f/2.4) + 2 MP (f/2.4), camera2 api: full
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Headset, Laddare, USB-kabel, EMUI 10.1, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: 0.85 W/kg huvud, 1.15 W/kg kropp, Widevine L3, fanless
Vikt
206 g, Strömförsörjning: 56 g
Pris
230 Kr
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78 % | 12/2020 | Huawei P Smart 2021 Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4 | 206 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 82 % | 09/2020 | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC SD 732G, Adreno 618 | 215 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 75 % | 11/2020 | Samsung Galaxy A20s SD 450, Adreno 506 | 183 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1560x720 | |
| 83 % | 06/2020 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 209 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 79 % | 01/2020 | Oppo A91 Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3 | 172 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
| 80 % | 10/2020 | Motorola Moto G9 Plus SD 730G, Adreno 618 | 223 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.81" | 2400x1080 | |
| 77 % | 06/2020 | Huawei P Smart 2020 Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4 | 163 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.21" | 2340x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Oppo A91 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1414, n=641) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
| Oppo A91 | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 1599, n=641) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s | |
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø70 (68-73)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø67.1 (33-100)
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide-angleLow LightWide-angleUltrawide-angle5x-Zoom
27.1 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
48.9 ∆E
42.1 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
29 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
54.4 ∆E
27 ∆E
38.1 ∆E
29 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
37 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 455 cd/m² Medel: 425.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.21 cd/m²Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 84 %
Mitt på batteriet: 455 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1034:1 (Svärta: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
| Huawei P Smart 2021 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67 | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67 | Samsung Galaxy A20s IPS, 1560x720, 6.50 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67 | Oppo A91 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40 | Motorola Moto G9 Plus LTPS, 2400x1080, 6.81 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -6% | -61% | 16% | -114% | -49% | |
| Brightness middle | 455 | 623 37% | 384 -16% | 610 34% | 594 31% | 390 -14% |
| Brightness | 426 | 600 41% | 367 -14% | 579 36% | 613 44% | 377 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 93 11% | 87 4% | 92 10% | 89 6% | 93 11% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.54 -23% | 0.42 5% | 0.37 16% | 0.66 -50% | |
| Contrast | 1034 | 1154 12% | 914 -12% | 1649 59% | 591 -43% | |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 1.6 | 1.8 -13% | 4.43 -177% | 1.8 -13% | 6.1 -281% | 3.39 -112% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 2.9 | 4.7 -62% | 7.34 -153% | 3 -3% | 10.6 -266% | 5.22 -80% |
| Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 2.2 | 3.3 -50% | 4.9 -123% | 2.5 -14% | 7 -218% | 4.3 -95% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.26 97% | 2.308 95% | 2.31 95% | 2.28 96% | 2.506 88% |
| CCT | 6868 95% | 6712 97% | 7671 85% | 6864 95% | 7370 88% | 6033 108% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms). | ||
Geekbench 5.3 | Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v8 | VRMark | BaseMark OS II
| Geekbench 5.3 | |
| OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1045 - 1050, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (255 - 7400, n=66) | |
| Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1017 - 1036, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (72 - 6252, n=69) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
| Oppo A91 | |
| Oppo A91 | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (1312 - 1332, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (248 - 4201, n=170) | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
| Oppo A91 | |
| Oppo A91 | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (297 - 299, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (63 - 1604, n=170) | |
| Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A | |
| Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=365) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A | |
| Average of class Smartphone (883 - 14476, n=432) | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A | |
| Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4970, n=432) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
| Oppo A91 | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (6287 - 7789, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=567) | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A (7991 - 8211, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 19989, n=716) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=834) | |
| T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1 - 142, n=843) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 180, n=739) | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 117, n=747) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=602) | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=604) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A | |
| Average of class Smartphone (53335 - 624727, n=152) | |
| VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A | |
| Average of class Smartphone (119 - 7649, n=100) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=226) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=659) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=205) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s | |
| WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=297) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A | |
| Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=829) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=855) | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P Smart 2021 | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | Samsung Galaxy A20s | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | Oppo A91 | Motorola Moto G9 Plus | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 24% | -24% | 24% | 10% | 28% | -11% | -18% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 64.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 55.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -14% | 65.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1% | 54.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -15% | 60.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -7% | 65.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1% | 61.8 (26.1 - 73.5, n=30) -4% | 51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564) -20% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 76.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 75.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -1% | 82.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 8% | 76.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1% | 77.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 1% | 85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 12% | 75 (29.2 - 85.9, n=30) -2% | 69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564) -9% |
| Random Write 4KB | 67.23 | 112.55 67% | 12.95 -81% | 112.93 68% | 28.55 -58% | 98.12 46% | 45.2 (8.48 - 151, n=32) -33% | 40.2 (0.14 - 319, n=935) -40% |
| Random Read 4KB | 92.39 | 123.43 34% | 75.87 -18% | 122.58 33% | 145.64 58% | 134.77 46% | 69.1 (20.7 - 112, n=32) -25% | 63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=935) -32% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 183.29 | 173.09 -6% | 90.59 -51% | 171.09 -7% | 185.26 1% | 186.23 2% | 192 (90 - 314, n=32) 5% | 139 (2.99 - 1321, n=935) -24% |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 308.11 | 505.96 64% | 298.23 -3% | 498.15 62% | 505.44 64% | 489.37 59% | 291 (107 - 501, n=32) -6% | 363 (12.1 - 2037, n=935) 18% |
PUBG mobile
; Smooth: Ø30 (28-31)
; Balanced: Ø29.9 (26-31)
; HD: Ø29.8 (24-31)
Armajet
: Ø59.2 (52-60)
Real Racing 3
: Ø59.1 (38-60)
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P Smart 2021 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Strömförbrukning
| Av/Standby |   0.02 / 0.28 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.75 / 2.2 / 2.26 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
5.05 / 8.85 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei P Smart 2021 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A20s 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh | Oppo A91 4025 mAh | Motorola Moto G9 Plus 5000 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -7% | -1% | 11% | 24% | 6% | 0% | 12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.75 | 0.93 -24% | 0.9 -20% | 0.75 -0% | 0.82 -9% | 0.8 -7% | 0.75 -0% | 0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=926) -19% |
| Idle Average * | 2.2 | 2.47 -12% | 1.8 18% | 2.19 -0% | 1.73 21% | 1.7 23% | 2.2 -0% | 1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=925) 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.26 | 2.51 -11% | 2.7 -19% | 2.24 1% | 1.75 23% | 2.2 3% | 2.26 -0% | 2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=926) 10% |
| Load Average * | 5.05 | 5.62 -11% | 5.2 -3% | 3.88 23% | 2.33 54% | 5.3 -5% | 5.05 -0% | 4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=920) 18% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.85 | 6.93 22% | 7.1 20% | 5.97 33% | 5.97 33% | 7.4 16% | 8.85 -0% | 6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=920) 31% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P Smart 2021 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A20s 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh | Oppo A91 4025 mAh | Motorola Moto G9 Plus 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 758 | 1116 47% | 812 7% | 1175 55% | 605 -20% | 968 28% |
För
+ Bra IPS-skärm
+ Låg värmeutveckling
+ Gedigen batteritid med snabbladdning på 22.5 Watt
+ Tredubbel kortplats
Emot
- Saknar GMS
- Saknar NFC
- Långsamt WLAN
- Skärmens ljusstyrka
- Långsam lagring
- Långsam SoC
- Widevine L3
Omdöme för P Smart 2021: Huawei hamnar inte bara efter i fråga om appar
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Huaweis mittenskiktstelefon har en del grundläggande förtjänster, såsom bra hantverk, en skaplig IPS-skärm och tillfredsställande batteritid i kombination med snabb laddning. Men inte mer än så. I synnerhet är prestandan från det nya Kirin 710A chippet helt enkelt för låg för en smartphone som har ett rekommenderat pris på 2.300 kronor.
Generellt kan P Smart 2021 inte riktigt stå ut från mängden av kraftfulla konkurrenter, och på de områden den står ut är det åt det negativa hållet. I synnerhet ger Poco X3 NFC eller Redmi Note 9 Pro betydligt mer smartphoneförmåga till ett liknande pris.
För 1.900 kronor, som den för tillfället kostar, borde man egentligen inte välja P Smart 2021. Huaweis direkta konkurrenter är Redmi 9 och Galaxy A20s, som båda går att få tag på för ca 1.400 kronor.
Och även om vi bortser från detta faktum gör avsaknaden av Googles Tjänster att det är svårt att rekommendera Huaweis smartphone, även om den hade lyckats gå om de andra tillverkarna i fråga om generell förmåga.
Huawei P Smart 2021 - 11/27/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich
Smartphone - Vägt medel