Notebookcheck

Test: Huawei P Smart 2021 - Är Huaweis första "hemmagjorda" SoC bra? (Sammanfattning)

Lång väg kvar... I och med Kirin 710A har Huawei flyttat chip-produktionen till sitt hemland Kina för att kunna bli oberoende av USA. Men den här milstolpen avslöjar också Huaweis dilemma.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Huawei P Smart 2021
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 710A 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
6.67 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 395 PPI, Tryckkänslig, kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 109 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD-kort upp till 512 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Närhetssensor, Kompass, USB-C, OTG, FM-radio
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5.1, LTE: FDD: B1 / B3 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B20 / B28, TDD:B38 / B40 / B41); UMTS: (B1 / B2 / B5 / B8); GSM: (B2 / B3 / B5 / B8), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.26 x 165.65 x 76.88
Batteri
5000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.8, 26mm, 1/2.0", 0.8µm) + 8 MP (f/2.4, 120˚) + 2 MP (f/2.4) + 2 MP (f/2.4), camera2 api: full
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Headset, Laddare, USB-kabel, EMUI 10.1, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: 0.85 W/​kg huvud, 1.15 W/​kg kropp, Widevine L3, fanless
Vikt
206 g, Strömförsörjning: 56 g
Pris
230 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
sökrelation
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
78 %
12/2020
Huawei P Smart 2021
Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4
206 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.67"2400x1080
82 %
09/2020
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
SD 732G, Adreno 618
215 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
75 %
11/2020
Samsung Galaxy A20s
SD 450, Adreno 506
183 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1560x720
83 %
06/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
79 %
01/2020
Oppo A91
Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.40"2400x1080
80 %
10/2020
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
SD 730G, Adreno 618
223 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.81"2400x1080
77 %
06/2020
Huawei P Smart 2020
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
163 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.21"2340x1080
Huawei P Smart 2021 Smartphone
Huawei P Smart 2021 Smartphone
Huawei P Smart 2021 Smartphone

Storleksjämförelse

170 mm 78.1 mm 9.7 mm 223 g165.65 mm 76.88 mm 9.26 mm 206 g165.3 mm 76.8 mm 9.4 mm 215 g165.75 mm 76.68 mm 8.8 mm 209 g163.3 mm 77.5 mm 8 mm 183 g160.2 mm 73.3 mm 7.9 mm 172 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
636 (500min - 675max) MBit/s ∼100% +806%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
619 (283min - 670max) MBit/s ∼97% +782%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=296, last 2 years)
402 MBit/s ∼63% +473%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
309 (140min - 360max) MBit/s ∼49% +340%
Oppo A91
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
294 (80min - 338max) MBit/s ∼46% +319%
Huawei P Smart 2021
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB eMMC Flash
70.2 (68min - 73max) MBit/s ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41.6 (28min - 58max) MBit/s ∼7% -41%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
633 (589min - 676max) MBit/s ∼100% +845%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s ∼87% +722%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=296, last 2 years)
390 MBit/s ∼62% +482%
Oppo A91
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
332 (312min - 337max) MBit/s ∼52% +396%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
326 (309min - 343max) MBit/s ∼52% +387%
Huawei P Smart 2021
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB eMMC Flash
67 (33min - 100max) MBit/s ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
28.3 (12min - 44max) MBit/s ∼4% -58%
051015202530354045505560657075808590957072716972687270736970687268707168687171726870697070687069717072716972687270736970687268707168687171726870697070687069716665677264696566706470683310063686964465598676868676670667069Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø70 (68-73)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø67.1 (33-100)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Huawei P Smart 2021
GPS Huawei P Smart 2021
GPS Huawei P Smart 2021
GPS Huawei P Smart 2021
GPS Huawei P Smart 2021
GPS Huawei P Smart 2021
Ultra-vidvinkel
Ultra-vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
6x zoom (max)
6x zoom (max)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleLow LightWide-angleUltrawide-angle5x-Zoom
ColorChecker
27.1 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
48.9 ∆E
42.1 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
29 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
54.4 ∆E
27 ∆E
38.1 ∆E
29 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
37 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei P Smart 2021: 36.5 ∆E min: 12.81 - max: 54.42 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.4 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei P Smart 2021: 8.59 ∆E min: 1.19 - max: 17.18 ∆E
442
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 455 cd/m² Medel: 425.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.21 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 84 %
Mitt på batteriet: 455 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1034:1 (Svärta: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Huawei P Smart 2021
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy A20s
IPS, 1560x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Oppo A91
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
LTPS, 2400x1080, 6.81
Screen
-6%
-61%
16%
-114%
-49%
Brightness middle
455
623
37%
384
-16%
610
34%
594
31%
390
-14%
Brightness
426
600
41%
367
-14%
579
36%
613
44%
377
-12%
Brightness Distribution
84
93
11%
87
4%
92
10%
89
6%
93
11%
Black Level *
0.44
0.54
-23%
0.42
5%
0.37
16%
0.66
-50%
Contrast
1034
1154
12%
914
-12%
1649
59%
591
-43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.6
1.8
-13%
4.43
-177%
1.8
-13%
6.1
-281%
3.39
-112%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.9
4.7
-62%
7.34
-153%
3
-3%
10.6
-266%
5.22
-80%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.2
3.3
-50%
4.9
-123%
2.5
-14%
7
-218%
4.3
-95%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.26 97%
2.308 95%
2.31 95%
2.28 96%
2.506 88%
CCT
6868 95%
6712 97%
7671 85%
6864 95%
7370 88%
6033 108%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9679 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (38.4 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1045 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1291 Points ∼62% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
259 Points ∼12% -75%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
1113 Points ∼54% +7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1045 - 1050, n=2)
1048 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=95, last 2 years)
2074 Points ∼100% +98%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1017 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1090 Points ∼56% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
987 Points ∼51% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1017 - 1036, n=2)
1027 Points ∼53% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=94, last 2 years)
1939 Points ∼100% +91%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1332 Points ∼70%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1356 Points ∼71% +2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1787 Points ∼93% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
902 Points ∼47% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1771 Points ∼93% +33%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1475 Points ∼77% +11%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1430 Points ∼75% +7%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
1786 Points ∼93% +34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1312 - 1332, n=2)
1322 Points ∼69% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=197, last 2 years)
1913 Points ∼100% +44%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
299 Points ∼53%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
330 Points ∼58% +10%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
567 Points ∼100% +90%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
159 Points ∼28% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
569 Points ∼100% +90%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
320 Points ∼56% +7%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
282 Points ∼50% -6%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
551 Points ∼97% +84%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (297 - 299, n=2)
298 Points ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=197, last 2 years)
554 Points ∼97% +85%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4766 Points ∼53%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
3896 Points ∼43% -18%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8962 Points ∼100% +88%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3349 Points ∼37% -30%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
8411 Points ∼94% +76%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
4766 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1535 - 12228, n=79, last 2 years)
6214 Points ∼69% +30%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5211 Points ∼72%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
5443 Points ∼75% +4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
7130 Points ∼98% +37%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3998 Points ∼55% -23%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
6987 Points ∼96% +34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
5211 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1163 - 14895, n=91, last 2 years)
7269 Points ∼100% +39%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1422 Points ∼54%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1554 Points ∼59% +9%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2638 Points ∼100% +86%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
778 Points ∼29% -45%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2556 Points ∼97% +80%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
1422 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (412 - 5099, n=91, last 2 years)
2354 Points ∼89% +66%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7789 Points ∼95%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6993 Points ∼85% -10%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8101 Points ∼99% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
4493 Points ∼55% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7829 Points ∼96% +1%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
8185 Points ∼100% +5%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
7737 Points ∼95% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (6287 - 7789, n=2)
7038 Points ∼86% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=268, last 2 years)
7674 Points ∼94% -1%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8211 Points ∼82%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
9854 Points ∼99% +20%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8773 Points ∼88% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
5836 Points ∼59% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
9091 Points ∼91% +11%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
9956 Points ∼100% +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (7991 - 8211, n=2)
8101 Points ∼81% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=245, last 2 years)
9813 Points ∼99% +20%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2298 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2827 Points ∼100% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2076 Points ∼73% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2721 Points ∼96% +18%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2304 Points ∼81% 0%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2775 Points ∼98% +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (2225 - 2298, n=2)
2262 Points ∼80% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=206, last 2 years)
2654 Points ∼94% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
911 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2427 Points ∼80% +166%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
402 Points ∼13% -56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2250 Points ∼74% +147%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1103 Points ∼36% +21%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2199 Points ∼73% +141%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (911 - 914, n=2)
913 Points ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (210 - 11259, n=206, last 2 years)
3027 Points ∼100% +232%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1066 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2506 Points ∼94% +135%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
489 Points ∼18% -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2340 Points ∼88% +120%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1248 Points ∼47% +17%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2310 Points ∼86% +117%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1052 - 1066, n=2)
1059 Points ∼40% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (262 - 6977, n=206, last 2 years)
2672 Points ∼100% +151%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2501 Points ∼73%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2478 Points ∼72% -1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3438 Points ∼100% +37%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1729 Points ∼50% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3236 Points ∼94% +29%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2621 Points ∼76% +5%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3391 Points ∼99% +36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (2411 - 2501, n=2)
2456 Points ∼71% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=267, last 2 years)
2883 Points ∼84% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
988 Points ∼29%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
875 Points ∼26% -11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2735 Points ∼80% +177%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
403 Points ∼12% -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2539 Points ∼74% +157%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1102 Points ∼32% +12%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2471 Points ∼72% +150%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (987 - 988, n=2)
988 Points ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=267, last 2 years)
3412 Points ∼100% +245%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1123 Points ∼37%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
991 Points ∼32% -12%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2865 Points ∼93% +155%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
488 Points ∼16% -57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2667 Points ∼87% +137%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1265 Points ∼41% +13%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2701 Points ∼88% +141%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1123 - 1136, n=2)
1130 Points ∼37% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=267, last 2 years)
3071 Points ∼100% +173%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2511 Points ∼73%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2496 Points ∼73% -1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1661 Points ∼48% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3226 Points ∼94% +28%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2606 Points ∼76% +4%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3352 Points ∼98% +33%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (2441 - 2511, n=2)
2476 Points ∼72% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=265, last 2 years)
2840 Points ∼83% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1452 Points ∼31%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1342 Points ∼28% -8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4086 Points ∼86% +181%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
702 Points ∼15% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3785 Points ∼80% +161%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1747 Points ∼37% +20%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3773 Points ∼79% +160%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1359 - 1452, n=2)
1406 Points ∼30% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=267, last 2 years)
4754 Points ∼100% +227%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1573 Points ∼40%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1508 Points ∼38% -4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3918 Points ∼100% +149%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
817 Points ∼21% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3645 Points ∼93% +132%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1885 Points ∼48% +20%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3704 Points ∼95% +135%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1507 - 1573, n=2)
1540 Points ∼39% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=267, last 2 years)
3783 Points ∼97% +140%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2338 Points ∼68%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2456 Points ∼71% +5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3436 Points ∼100% +47%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1702 Points ∼50% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3170 Points ∼92% +36%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2550 Points ∼74% +9%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3328 Points ∼97% +42%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (2203 - 2338, n=2)
2271 Points ∼66% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=258, last 2 years)
2769 Points ∼81% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
951 Points ∼34%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
845 Points ∼30% -11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2559 Points ∼91% +169%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
382 Points ∼14% -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2356 Points ∼84% +148%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1117 Points ∼40% +17%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2293 Points ∼82% +141%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (945 - 951, n=2)
948 Points ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=258, last 2 years)
2804 Points ∼100% +195%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1099 Points ∼41%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
999 Points ∼37% -9%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2713 Points ∼100% +147%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
438 Points ∼16% -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2499 Points ∼92% +127%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1276 Points ∼47% +16%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2489 Points ∼92% +126%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1082 - 1099, n=2)
1091 Points ∼40% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=258, last 2 years)
2627 Points ∼97% +139%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2332 Points ∼69%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2487 Points ∼74% +7%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3382 Points ∼100% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1672 Points ∼49% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3263 Points ∼96% +40%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2568 Points ∼76% +10%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3349 Points ∼99% +44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (2191 - 2332, n=2)
2262 Points ∼67% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=258, last 2 years)
2728 Points ∼81% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1493 Points ∼38%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1335 Points ∼34% -11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3917 Points ∼99% +162%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
701 Points ∼18% -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3620 Points ∼92% +142%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1767 Points ∼45% +18%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3678 Points ∼93% +146%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1326 - 1493, n=2)
1410 Points ∼36% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=258, last 2 years)
3949 Points ∼100% +165%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1525 Points ∼40%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1489 Points ∼39% -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3784 Points ∼100% +148%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
825 Points ∼22% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3534 Points ∼93% +132%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1899 Points ∼50% +25%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3556 Points ∼94% +133%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (1454 - 1525, n=2)
1490 Points ∼39% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=258, last 2 years)
3345 Points ∼88% +119%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12601 Points ∼51%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
22398 Points ∼91% +78%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
20797 Points ∼85% +65%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
15273 Points ∼62% +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20054 Points ∼82% +59%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
24514 Points ∼100% +95%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
20382 Points ∼83% +62%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (12601 - 12880, n=2)
12741 Points ∼52% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 59268, n=231, last 2 years)
22801 Points ∼93% +81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
23224 Points ∼41%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2177 Points ∼4% -91%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
56640 Points ∼100% +144%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
12736 Points ∼22% -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
51789 Points ∼91% +123%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
23159 Points ∼41% 0%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
53182 Points ∼94% +129%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (22844 - 23224, n=2)
23034 Points ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=230, last 2 years)
55452 Points ∼98% +139%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19601 Points ∼48%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
21876 Points ∼53% +12%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
40955 Points ∼100% +109%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
13203 Points ∼32% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38315 Points ∼94% +95%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
23447 Points ∼57% +20%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
39572 Points ∼97% +102%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (19493 - 19601, n=2)
19547 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=230, last 2 years)
38643 Points ∼94% +97%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
40 fps ∼41%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
39 fps ∼40% -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
91 fps ∼93% +128%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
22 fps ∼22% -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
85 fps ∼87% +113%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
86 fps ∼88% +115%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
40 fps ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=218, last 2 years)
98.2 fps ∼100% +146%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
36 fps ∼60%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
35 fps ∼58% -3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +67%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
33 fps ∼55% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +67%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
57 fps ∼95% +58%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
36 fps ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=218, last 2 years)
53.2 fps ∼89% +48%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼33%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
18 fps ∼31% -5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
45 fps ∼79% +137%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
9.4 fps ∼16% -51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼72% +116%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
42 fps ∼73% +121%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
19 fps ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=217, last 2 years)
57.2 fps ∼100% +201%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
15 fps ∼36%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
14 fps ∼34% -7%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼82% +127%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
17 fps ∼41% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼94% +160%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
38 fps ∼91% +153%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
15 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=216, last 2 years)
41.7 fps ∼100% +178%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
13 fps ∼33%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
14 fps ∼36% +8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
33 fps ∼84% +154%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.9 fps ∼18% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼77% +131%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
30 fps ∼77% +131%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
13 fps ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 117, n=214, last 2 years)
39.1 fps ∼100% +201%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.9 fps ∼24%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
12 fps ∼37% +52%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28 fps ∼86% +254%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
13 fps ∼40% +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼89% +267%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
27 fps ∼83% +242%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
7.9 fps ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=214, last 2 years)
32.6 fps ∼100% +313%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.4 fps ∼32%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2.3 fps ∼17% -48%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼79% +150%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.8 fps ∼27% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼79% +150%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
4.5 fps ∼32% +2%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
10 fps ∼72% +127%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (4.4 - 4.5, n=2)
4.45 fps ∼32% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=268, last 2 years)
13.9 fps ∼100% +216%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.8 fps ∼29%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
4 fps ∼42% +43%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
7.5 fps ∼79% +168%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1.4 fps ∼15% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.9 fps ∼72% +146%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2.9 fps ∼30% +4%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
6.3 fps ∼66% +125%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (2.8 - 2.9, n=2)
2.85 fps ∼30% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=267, last 2 years)
9.55 fps ∼100% +241%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.7 fps ∼32%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.1 fps ∼29% -9%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼86% +169%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.3 fps ∼30% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼81% +154%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
7.5 fps ∼36% +12%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
16 fps ∼77% +139%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (6.7 - 6.8, n=2)
6.75 fps ∼32% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 66, n=267, last 2 years)
20.9 fps ∼100% +212%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.6 fps ∼32%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7 fps ∼29% -8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
20 fps ∼83% +163%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.6 fps ∼15% -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼75% +137%
Oppo A91
Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
8.8 fps ∼37% +16%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
18 fps ∼75% +137%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
  (7.6 - 7.6, n=2)
7.6 fps ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=267, last 2 years)
24 fps ∼100% +216%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8.1 fps ∼34%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7.7 fps ∼33% -5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
19 fps ∼81% +135%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.6 fps ∼15% -56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼77% +122%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
17 fps ∼72% +110%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
8.1 fps ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=213, last 2 years)
23.5 fps ∼100% +190%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.1 fps ∼35%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.4 fps ∼31% -10%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼83% +139%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.6 fps ∼32% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼83% +139%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
16 fps ∼78% +125%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
7.1 fps ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 60, n=213, last 2 years)
20.5 fps ∼100% +189%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
169704 Points ∼51%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
194475 Points ∼59% +15%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
279048 Points ∼84% +64%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
90185 Points ∼27% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
271934 Points ∼82% +60%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
251673 Points ∼76% +48%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
169704 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=169, last 2 years)
331865 Points ∼100% +96%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1221 Score ∼38%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2373 Score ∼74% +94%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
1221 Score ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 7649, n=54, last 2 years)
3208 Score ∼100% +163%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1023 Points ∼73%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1179 Points ∼85% +15%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1395 Points ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
981 Points ∼70% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1226 Points ∼88% +20%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
1347 Points ∼97% +32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
1023 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=203, last 2 years)
1224 Points ∼88% +20%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1572 Points ∼30%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1476 Points ∼28% -6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3960 Points ∼76% +152%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
984 Points ∼19% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3757 Points ∼72% +139%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3984 Points ∼77% +153%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
1572 Points ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=203, last 2 years)
5195 Points ∼100% +230%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2772 Points ∼62%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2913 Points ∼65% +5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4041 Points ∼91% +46%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1182 Points ∼27% -57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4452 Points ∼100% +61%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
4029 Points ∼90% +45%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
2772 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=203, last 2 years)
3983 Points ∼89% +44%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4934 Points ∼72%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
5134 Points ∼75% +4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
6542 Points ∼95% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2783 Points ∼41% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6856 Points ∼100% +39%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
6612 Points ∼96% +34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
4934 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=203, last 2 years)
6304 Points ∼92% +28%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2173 Points ∼62%
Huawei P smart Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2258 Points ∼65% +4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3477 Points ∼100% +60%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1249 Points ∼36% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3444 Points ∼99% +58%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3412 Points ∼98% +57%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
2173 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=203, last 2 years)
3411 Points ∼98% +57%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
52.591 Points ∼100% +75%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
50.582 Points ∼96% +68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
47.901 Points ∼91% +59%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=185, last 2 years)
47.7 Points ∼91% +58%
Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11)
30.129 Points ∼57%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
30.1 Points ∼57% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)
15.983 Points ∼30% -47%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
90.555 Points ∼100% +87%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
86.75 Points ∼96% +79%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
86.541 Points ∼96% +79%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=190, last 2 years)
85.4 Points ∼94% +76%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
48.5 Points ∼54% 0%
Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11)
48.473 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)
22.442 Points ∼25% -54%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=162, last 2 years)
49.1 runs/min ∼100% +81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
45.2 runs/min ∼92% +67%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
43.9 runs/min ∼89% +62%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
43.3 runs/min ∼88% +60%
Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11)
27.1 runs/min ∼55%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
27.1 runs/min ∼55% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
12.4 runs/min ∼25% -54%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=203, last 2 years)
75.9 Points ∼100% +38%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
72 Points ∼95% +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
71 Points ∼94% +29%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
68 Points ∼90% +24%
Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11)
55 Points ∼72%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
55 Points ∼72% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)
29 Points ∼38% -47%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
17398 Points ∼100% +95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
17265 Points ∼99% +94%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
16729 Points ∼96% +88%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=213, last 2 years)
16273 Points ∼94% +83%
Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11)
8911 Points ∼51%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
8911 Points ∼51% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)
3982 Points ∼23% -55%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)
11620.2 ms * ∼100% -163%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=215, last 2 years)
4424 ms * ∼38% -0%
Huawei P Smart 2021 (Huawei Browser V11)
4411.23 ms * ∼38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
4411 ms * ∼38% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
2850.1 ms * ∼25% +35%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
2783.1 ms * ∼24% +37%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
2672.8 ms * ∼23% +39%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P Smart 2021Xiaomi Poco X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy A20sXiaomi Redmi Note 9 ProOppo A91Motorola Moto G9 PlusAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
24%
-24%
24%
10%
28%
-9%
47%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
55.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-14%
65.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
54.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-15%
60.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
65.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
62.5 (26.1 - 81.9, n=33)
-3%
58.4 (1.7 - 83.3, n=193, last 2 years)
-10%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
75.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-1%
82.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
76.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
77.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
1%
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
78 (29.2 - 154, n=33)
2%
76.2 (13.4 - 154, n=193, last 2 years)
0%
Random Write 4KB
67.23
112.55
67%
12.95
-81%
112.93
68%
28.55
-58%
98.12
46%
44.9 (8.48 - 151, n=37)
-33%
108 (4.78 - 319, n=274, last 2 years)
61%
Random Read 4KB
92.39
123.43
34%
75.87
-18%
122.58
33%
145.64
58%
134.77
46%
77.1 (20.7 - 247, n=37)
-17%
126 (13.5 - 325, n=274, last 2 years)
36%
Sequential Write 256KB
183.29
173.09
-6%
90.59
-51%
171.09
-7%
185.26
1%
186.23
2%
191 (90 - 314, n=37)
4%
301 (11.9 - 1321, n=274, last 2 years)
64%
Sequential Read 256KB
308.11
505.96
64%
298.23
-3%
498.15
62%
505.44
64%
489.37
59%
289 (107 - 501, n=37)
-6%
711 (41.9 - 2037, n=274, last 2 years)
131%
PUBG mobile
0510152025303030303029313030283130303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030302931283130303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303029313030283130303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030302931283130303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030263030303031293030303030303030303030303030303030303030303028313030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303029313030283130303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030302931283130303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030263030303031293030303030303030303030303030303030303030303028313030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030302930303030303029313030293030303029312930302931302924242928303030303029303030303030303030292930302930282830293030303030293030303030303030303030303030303030313030293030303030303030303030303030303030303030302931303030293130303030293030303030303030303030303030Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø30 (28-31)
; Balanced: Ø29.9 (26-31)
; HD: Ø29.8 (24-31)
Armajet
05101520253035404550556060595860606060606060606060605959606060605759606060605960606060596060606060596060606060606053556060606058605860596060606060606060606060606060606058606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060586057595759606060606060606060606060606060606060605959606059586060575560606060606059595760605959595860575457596056575759606060606060606059606059605258575755575554525255546060605860Tooltip
: Ø59.2 (52-60)
Real Racing 3
0510152025303540455055605960606060606060606059595960606060595960606060606054606058555653525657595959606060606060606060606060606060606060606060605960606060606060606060606060606060605860603859585959596060Tooltip
: Ø59.1 (38-60)
Hög belastning
 33.3 °C33.7 °C31 °C 
 33.2 °C31.6 °C32 °C 
 33.3 °C32.1 °C32.1 °C 
Max: 33.7 °C
Medel: 32.5 °C
29.4 °C29.1 °C30.6 °C
29.2 °C29.8 °C32.6 °C
29.4 °C30.5 °C32.2 °C
Max: 32.6 °C
Medel: 30.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  26.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.440.12523.331.73126344022.632.15034.532.76319.9348014.734.410014.438.112514.93816017.839.820018.941.425011.749.231513.952.14001362.450010.365.463010.469.380012.473.7100011.178.4125011.277.7160012.776.4200012.378250012.679.9315012.782.4400012.784.5500012.780.5630013.572.180001468.71000013.571.81250014.969.6160001657.7SPL24.891N0.680.5median 12.7median 69.6Delta11230.530.121.326.518.425.822.52420.328.115.828.315.728.616.728.315.133.11550.410.651.114.155.410.862.310.962.410.567.28.8691071.110.173.111.176.111.979.61180.512.180.812.57812.778.313.478.913.874.21571.11467.814.162.814.162.424.489.20.574.8median 12.5median 69210.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P Smart 2021Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P Smart 2021 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.28 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.75 / 2.2 / 2.26 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.05 / 8.85 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Huawei P Smart 2021
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
5160 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A20s
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh
Oppo A91
4025 mAh
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
5000 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710A
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-7%
-1%
11%
24%
6%
0%
6%
Idle Minimum *
0.75
0.93
-24%
0.9
-20%
0.75
-0%
0.82
-9%
0.8
-7%
0.75
-0%
0.924 (0.37 - 2.3, n=235, last 2 years)
-23%
Idle Average *
2.2
2.47
-12%
1.8
18%
2.19
-0%
1.73
21%
1.7
23%
2.2
-0%
1.848 (0.82 - 3.94, n=235, last 2 years)
16%
Idle Maximum *
2.26
2.51
-11%
2.7
-19%
2.24
1%
1.75
23%
2.2
3%
2.26
-0%
2.13 (0.85 - 4.2, n=235, last 2 years)
6%
Load Average *
5.05
5.62
-11%
5.2
-3%
3.88
23%
2.33
54%
5.3
-5%
5.05
-0%
4.44 (2.1 - 8.4, n=235, last 2 years)
12%
Load Maximum *
8.85
6.93
22%
7.1
20%
5.97
33%
5.97
33%
7.4
16%
8.85
-0%
7.21 (3.16 - 12.3, n=235, last 2 years)
19%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12tim 38min
Huawei P Smart 2021
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
5160 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A20s
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh
Oppo A91
4025 mAh
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
758
1116
47%
812
7%
1175
55%
605
-20%
968
28%

För

+ Bra IPS-skärm
+ Låg värmeutveckling
+ Gedigen batteritid med snabbladdning på 22.5 Watt
+ Tredubbel kortplats

Emot

- Saknar GMS
- Saknar NFC
- Långsamt WLAN
- Skärmens ljusstyrka
- Långsam lagring
- Långsam SoC
- Widevine L3

Omdöme för P Smart 2021: Huawei hamnar inte bara efter i fråga om appar

Recension av Huawei P Smart 2021. Recensionsex från Huawei Germany.
Recension av Huawei P Smart 2021. Recensionsex från Huawei Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

 Huaweis mittenskiktstelefon har en del grundläggande förtjänster, såsom bra hantverk, en skaplig IPS-skärm och tillfredsställande batteritid i kombination med snabb laddning. Men inte mer än så. I synnerhet är prestandan från det nya Kirin 710A chippet helt enkelt för låg för en smartphone som har ett rekommenderat pris på 2.300 kronor.

Generellt kan P Smart 2021 inte riktigt stå ut från mängden av kraftfulla konkurrenter, och på de områden den står ut är det åt det negativa hållet. I synnerhet ger Poco X3 NFC eller Redmi Note 9 Pro betydligt mer smartphoneförmåga till ett liknande pris.

För 1.900 kronor, som den för tillfället kostar, borde man egentligen inte välja P Smart 2021. Huaweis direkta konkurrenter är Redmi 9 och Galaxy A20s, som båda går att få tag på för ca 1.400 kronor.

Och även om vi bortser från detta faktum gör avsaknaden av Googles Tjänster att det är svårt att rekommendera Huaweis smartphone, även om den hade lyckats gå om de andra tillverkarna i fråga om generell förmåga.

Huawei P Smart 2021 - 11/27/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Design
86%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Mus
90%
Anslutningar
44 / 70 → 63%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
89%
Skärm
88%
<