Notebookcheck

Test: Samsung Galaxy A20s - Med en Snapdragon SoC, är den bättre än Galaxy A21s?

Väldigt billig, men är den bra? Galaxy A20s kostar bara 1.400 kronor men har en stor skärm som kan användas till massor av kul - det är iallafall så Samsung marknadsför sin instegstelefon. I den här recensionen får du reda på om Galaxy A20s verkligen är kul att använda till vardags trots det låga priset.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Galaxy A20 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 8 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Minne
3072 MB 
Skärm
6.50 tum 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 pixlar 264 PPI, Tryckkänslig, kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 21 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD (upp till 512 GB), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyro, Närhet, Kompass, OTG
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8 x 163.3 x 77.5
Batteri
4000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/1.8, 27mm) + 8 MP (f/2.2, 13mm) + 5 MP (f/2.2)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Övrigt
Högtalare: Mono, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, OneUI Core 2.0, 24 Månader Garanti, Widevine L1, SAR: 0.35W/​kg Huvud, 0.83W/​kg Kropp, fanless
Vikt
183 g
Pris
200 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
75 %
11/2020
Samsung Galaxy A20s
SD 450, Adreno 506
183 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1560x720
80 %
09/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
199 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.53"2340x1080
76 %
06/2020
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2
192 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
78 %
06/2020
realme 6i
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
199 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
75 %
10/2020
Nokia 2.4
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
195 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
76 %
11/2020
Wiko View5
Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320
201 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.55"1600x720
Test av Samsung Galaxy A20s
Test av Samsung Galaxy A20s
Test av Samsung Galaxy A20s
Test av Samsung Galaxy A20s
Test av Samsung Galaxy A20s
Test av Samsung Galaxy A20s

Storleksjämförelse

165.95 mm 76.8 mm 9.3 mm 201 g165.9 mm 76.3 mm 8.7 mm 195 g164.4 mm 75.4 mm 9 mm 199 g163.7 mm 75.3 mm 8.9 mm 192 g163.3 mm 77.5 mm 8 mm 183 g162.3 mm 77.2 mm 8.9 mm 199 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
355 (327min - 366max) MBit/s ∼100% +753%
Wiko View5
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A25, 64 GB eMMC Flash
332 (272min - 346max) MBit/s ∼94% +698%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Mali-G52 MP2, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
326 (280min - 333max) MBit/s ∼92% +684%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=641)
290 MBit/s ∼82% +597%
Nokia 2.4
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.2 (30min - 78max) MBit/s ∼15% +25%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41.6 (28min - 58max) MBit/s ∼12%
realme 6i
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
36.1 (9min - 57max) MBit/s ∼10% -13%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
347 (172min - 352max) MBit/s ∼100% +1126%
Wiko View5
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A25, 64 GB eMMC Flash
342 (172min - 350max) MBit/s ∼99% +1108%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Mali-G52 MP2, Exynos 850, 32 GB eMMC Flash
310 (269min - 342max) MBit/s ∼89% +995%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=641)
276 MBit/s ∼80% +875%
realme 6i
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
66.5 (34min - 69max) MBit/s ∼19% +135%
Nokia 2.4
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46.9 (22min - 77max) MBit/s ∼14% +66%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
28.3 (12min - 44max) MBit/s ∼8%
0102030405060Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø41.4 (28-58)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø28.4 (12-44)
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Samsung Galaxy A20s
GPS Samsung Galaxy A20s
GPS Samsung Galaxy A20s
GPS Samsung Galaxy A20s
GPS Samsung Galaxy A20s
GPS Samsung Galaxy A20s
Vidvinkel
Vidvinkel
13 MP Huvudkamera
13 MP Huvudkamera
4x zoom (max)
4x zoom (max)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraLow LightMain cameraWide angle
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
76.7 ∆E
44 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A20s: 47.43 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 93.71 ∆E
ColorChecker
12.2 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
8 ∆E
8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A20s: 8.84 ∆E min: 3.22 - max: 14.42 ∆E
379
cd/m²
379
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
369
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 384 cd/m² Medel: 366.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.56 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 384 cd/m²
Kontrast: 914:1 (Svärta: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.43 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
94.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.308
Samsung Galaxy A20s
IPS, 1560x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
IPS LCD, 2340x1080, 6.53
Samsung Galaxy A21s
PLS, 1600x720, 6.50
realme 6i
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Nokia 2.4
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Wiko View5
LCD IPS, 1600x720, 6.55
Screen
77%
3%
12%
17%
38%
Brightness middle
384
553
44%
540
41%
518
35%
445
16%
495
29%
Brightness
367
527
44%
509
39%
484
32%
405
10%
461
26%
Brightness Distribution
87
89
2%
91
5%
89
2%
85
-2%
88
1%
Black Level *
0.42
0.12
71%
0.36
14%
0.26
38%
0.26
38%
0.14
67%
Contrast
914
4608
404%
1500
64%
1992
118%
1712
87%
3536
287%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.43
3.8
14%
6.58
-49%
5.8
-31%
4.73
-7%
6.5
-47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.34
8.7
-19%
11.55
-57%
11
-50%
8.83
-20%
10
-36%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.9
2.2
55%
6.4
-31%
7.3
-49%
4.2
14%
6.2
-27%
Gamma
2.308 95%
2.3 96%
2.206 100%
2.23 99%
2.292 96%
2.22 99%
CCT
7671 85%
6727 97%
8482 77%
8037 81%
7378 88%
8157 80%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
259 Points ∼14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1198 Points ∼62% +363%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
593 Points ∼31% +129%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (259 - 267, n=2)
263 Points ∼14% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7400, n=66)
1918 Points ∼100% +641%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
902 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1259 Points ∼65% +40%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1081 Points ∼56% +20%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1348 Points ∼70% +49%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
475 Points ∼25% -47%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
865 Points ∼45% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (498 - 902, n=2)
700 Points ∼36% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=170)
1937 Points ∼100% +115%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
159 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
356 Points ∼64% +124%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
182 Points ∼33% +14%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
387 Points ∼69% +143%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
134 Points ∼24% -16%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
140 Points ∼25% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (131 - 159, n=2)
145 Points ∼26% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (63 - 1604, n=170)
560 Points ∼100% +252%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3349 Points ∼68%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4932 Points ∼100% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (2777 - 3374, n=10)
3146 Points ∼64% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=365)
4925 Points ∼100% +47%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3998 Points ∼68%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5905 Points ∼100% +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (3272 - 4022, n=13)
3862 Points ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 14476, n=432)
5053 Points ∼86% +26%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
778 Points ∼42%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1841 Points ∼100% +137%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (741 - 787, n=13)
761 Points ∼41% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4970, n=432)
1545 Points ∼84% +99%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
4493 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
8698 Points ∼100% +94%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
5457 Points ∼62% +21%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8733 Points ∼100% +94%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
5380 Points ∼62% +20%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4302 Points ∼49% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (4171 - 4759, n=13)
4493 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=567)
6083 Points ∼70% +35%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
5836 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
11421 Points ∼95% +96%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
7113 Points ∼59% +22%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
12043 Points ∼100% +106%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7465 Points ∼62% +28%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6032 Points ∼50% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (4836 - 6062, n=13)
5324 Points ∼44% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=716)
6702 Points ∼56% +15%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2076 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2059 Points ∼78% -1%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2474 Points ∼94% +19%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2012 Points ∼76% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (2076 - 2098, n=3)
2090 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=219)
2636 Points ∼100% +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
402 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
775 Points ∼26% +93%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1174 Points ∼39% +192%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
455 Points ∼15% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (401 - 407, n=3)
403 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=219)
3011 Points ∼100% +649%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
489 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
900 Points ∼34% +84%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1329 Points ∼50% +172%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
559 Points ∼21% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (487 - 489, n=3)
488 Points ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=219)
2656 Points ∼100% +443%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1729 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2168 Points ∼81% +25%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2689 Points ∼100% +56%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
981 Points ∼36% -43%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
858 Points ∼32% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (1529 - 1826, n=13)
1771 Points ∼66% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=576)
2290 Points ∼85% +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
403 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
784 Points ∼34% +95%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1179 Points ∼52% +193%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
408 Points ∼18% +1%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
387 Points ∼17% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (403 - 415, n=13)
412 Points ∼18% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=576)
2288 Points ∼100% +468%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
488 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
914 Points ∼43% +87%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1347 Points ∼64% +176%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
469 Points ∼22% -4%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
432 Points ∼20% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (488 - 501, n=13)
497 Points ∼24% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=577)
2113 Points ∼100% +333%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1661 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2190 Points ∼86% +32%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2552 Points ∼100% +54%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
973 Points ∼38% -41%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
892 Points ∼35% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (1580 - 1816, n=13)
1760 Points ∼69% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=607)
2208 Points ∼87% +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
702 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1157 Points ∼37% +65%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1630 Points ∼52% +132%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
775 Points ∼25% +10%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
712 Points ∼23% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (702 - 718, n=13)
713 Points ∼23% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 22052, n=607)
3140 Points ∼100% +347%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
817 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1292 Points ∼50% +58%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1772 Points ∼69% +117%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
812 Points ∼31% -1%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
747 Points ∼29% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (808 - 828, n=13)
822 Points ∼32% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=607)
2578 Points ∼100% +216%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1702 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2037 Points ∼78% +20%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2607 Points ∼100% +53%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1126 Points ∼43% -34%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1032 Points ∼40% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (1521 - 1855, n=13)
1784 Points ∼68% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=656)
2165 Points ∼83% +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
382 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
788 Points ∼41% +106%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1179 Points ∼62% +209%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
350 Points ∼18% -8%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
320 Points ∼17% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (349 - 382, n=13)
365 Points ∼19% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=656)
1906 Points ∼100% +399%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
438 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
912 Points ∼50% +108%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1342 Points ∼74% +206%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
413 Points ∼23% -6%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
377 Points ∼21% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (438 - 449, n=13)
443 Points ∼24% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=657)
1809 Points ∼100% +313%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1672 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2034 Points ∼78% +22%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2610 Points ∼100% +56%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1130 Points ∼43% -32%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1033 Points ∼40% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (1504 - 1901, n=13)
1782 Points ∼68% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5301, n=698)
2038 Points ∼78% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
701 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1157 Points ∼45% +65%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1625 Points ∼64% +132%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
731 Points ∼29% +4%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
659 Points ∼26% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (690 - 716, n=13)
701 Points ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=697)
2545 Points ∼100% +263%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
825 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1280 Points ∼59% +55%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1774 Points ∼82% +115%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
793 Points ∼36% -4%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
712 Points ∼33% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (800 - 829, n=13)
812 Points ∼37% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=700)
2173 Points ∼100% +163%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
15273 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
18816 Points ∼100% +23%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
16820 Points ∼89% +10%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11885 Points ∼63% -22%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11236 Points ∼60% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (13596 - 15273, n=12)
14216 Points ∼76% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=842)
15957 Points ∼85% +4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
12736 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
16301 Points ∼56% +28%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
25518 Points ∼88% +100%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
13222 Points ∼45% +4%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
12401 Points ∼43% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (12281 - 12736, n=12)
12470 Points ∼43% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 224130, n=840)
29153 Points ∼100% +129%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
13203 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
16800 Points ∼73% +27%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
22888 Points ∼100% +73%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
12900 Points ∼56% -2%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
12047 Points ∼53% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (12562 - 13203, n=12)
12801 Points ∼56% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=840)
22274 Points ∼97% +69%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
22 fps ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
24 fps ∼49% +9%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
44 fps ∼90% +100%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
20 fps ∼41% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (21 - 23, n=12)
21.8 fps ∼45% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=834)
48.7 fps ∼100% +121%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
33 fps ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
34 fps ∼62% +3%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
55 fps ∼100% +67%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
26 fps ∼47% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (20 - 34, n=12)
27.8 fps ∼51% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 142, n=843)
32.5 fps ∼59% -2%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
9.4 fps ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
15 fps ∼52% +60%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
24 fps ∼83% +155%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11 fps ∼38% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (9.2 - 9.4, n=12)
9.3 fps ∼32% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=739)
28.9 fps ∼100% +207%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
17 fps ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
28 fps ∼65% +65%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
43 fps ∼100% +153%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
18 fps ∼42% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (8.7 - 18, n=12)
13.8 fps ∼32% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 117, n=747)
23.8 fps ∼55% +40%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.9 fps ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
9.4 fps ∼41% +36%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼69% +132%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.7 fps ∼29% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (6 - 6.9, n=12)
6.15 fps ∼27% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=602)
23.1 fps ∼100% +235%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
13 fps ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
19 fps ∼61% +46%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
31 fps ∼100% +138%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
12 fps ∼39% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (5.7 - 13, n=12)
9.81 fps ∼32% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=604)
20.6 fps ∼66% +58%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.8 fps ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
7.2 fps ∼61% +89%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
11 fps ∼93% +189%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.5 fps ∼38% +18%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.3 fps ∼36% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (1.9 - 3.8, n=5)
3.34 fps ∼28% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=366)
11.8 fps ∼100% +211%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1.4 fps ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2.2 fps ∼27% +57%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.3 fps ∼40% +136%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.4 fps ∼17% 0%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.2 fps ∼15% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (1.1 - 1.4, n=5)
1.18 fps ∼14% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=364)
8.23 fps ∼100% +488%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.3 fps ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
12 fps ∼67% +90%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
18 fps ∼100% +186%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7.1 fps ∼39% +13%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.9 fps ∼38% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (3.2 - 6.4, n=5)
5.6 fps ∼31% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=370)
17.6 fps ∼98% +179%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.6 fps ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
6.2 fps ∼31% +72%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.2 fps ∼46% +156%
Nokia 2.4
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4 fps ∼20% +11%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.5 fps ∼17% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (3.3 - 3.6, n=5)
3.42 fps ∼17% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=370)
20.1 fps ∼100% +458%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
3.6 fps ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
5.9 fps ∼38% +64%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.4 fps ∼61% +161%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.8 fps ∼12% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (3.3 - 3.6, n=12)
3.44 fps ∼22% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=527)
15.4 fps ∼100% +328%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
6.6 fps ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
11 fps ∼65% +67%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
17 fps ∼100% +158%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5.6 fps ∼33% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (3.3 - 7, n=12)
5.32 fps ∼31% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=531)
13.6 fps ∼80% +106%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
90185 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
124232 Points ∼38% +38%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
181928 Points ∼56% +102%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
97328 Points ∼30% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (89022 - 90185, n=2)
89604 Points ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 624727, n=152)
325323 Points ∼100% +261%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
981 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1198 Points ∼99% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
990 Points ∼82% +1%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1211 Points ∼100% +23%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
934 Points ∼77% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (10 - 981, n=13)
660 Points ∼55% -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 2169, n=764)
843 Points ∼70% -14%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
984 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1845 Points ∼71% +88%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1159 Points ∼44% +18%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1735 Points ∼66% +76%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
912 Points ∼35% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (943 - 984, n=13)
962 Points ∼37% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=764)
2615 Points ∼100% +166%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1182 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2536 Points ∼100% +115%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1884 Points ∼74% +59%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2542 Points ∼100% +115%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1047 Points ∼41% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (770 - 1522, n=13)
1037 Points ∼41% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=764)
1976 Points ∼78% +67%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
2783 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
5010 Points ∼100% +80%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
3382 Points ∼68% +22%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4516 Points ∼90% +62%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2492 Points ∼50% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (2560 - 2898, n=13)
2745 Points ∼55% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=764)
3587 Points ∼72% +29%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A20s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Adreno 506, 3072
1249 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2285 Points ∼100% +83%
Samsung Galaxy A21s
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1644 Points ∼72% +32%
realme 6i
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2216 Points ∼97% +77%
Wiko View5
Mediatek Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1255 Points ∼55% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
  (389 - 1337, n=13)
1068 Points ∼47% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6402, n=764)
1844 Points ∼81% +48%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=226)
42.9 Points ∼100% +168%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
29.951 Points ∼70% +87%
realme 6i (Chrome 81)
28.96 Points ∼68% +81%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chrome 84)
19.147 Points ∼45% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)
15.983 Points ∼37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (14.6 - 16.5, n=3)
15.7 Points ∼37% -2%
Wiko View5 (Chrome 86)
12.372 Points ∼29% -23%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
realme 6i (Chrome 81)
54.343 Points ∼100% +142%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
53.874 Points ∼99% +140%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=659)
50.4 Points ∼93% +125%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chrome 84)
28.012 Points ∼52% +25%
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)
22.442 Points ∼41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.7, n=12)
22.3 Points ∼41% -1%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=205)
45.2 runs/min ∼100% +265%
realme 6i (Chrome 81)
27.7 runs/min ∼61% +123%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
27 runs/min ∼60% +118%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chome 84)
15 runs/min ∼33% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12.4 - 14.6, n=3)
13.1 runs/min ∼29% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A20s
12.4 runs/min ∼27%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=297)
71.1 Points ∼100% +145%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
45 Points ∼63% +55%
realme 6i (Chrome 81)
43 Points ∼60% +48%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chrome 84)
35 Points ∼49% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (29 - 34, n=7)
31.7 Points ∼45% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)
29 Points ∼41%
Wiko View5 (Chrome 86)
22 Points ∼31% -24%
Octane V2 - Total Score
realme 6i (Chrome 81)
10485 Points ∼100% +163%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
10299 Points ∼98% +159%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=829)
8416 Points ∼80% +111%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chrome 84)
4976 Points ∼47% +25%
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)
3982 Points ∼38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4115, n=13)
3982 Points ∼38% 0%
Wiko View5 (Chrome 86)
3526 Points ∼34% -11%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Wiko View5 (Chrome 86)
14832.2 ms * ∼100% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A20s (Chrome86)
11620.2 ms * ∼78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11012 - 11863, n=13)
11490 ms * ∼77% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=855)
9488 ms * ∼64% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A21s (Chrome 84)
9174.1 ms * ∼62% +21%
realme 6i (Chrome 81)
3937.5 ms * ∼27% +66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (Chrome 85)
3901.3 ms * ∼26% +66%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy A20sXiaomi Redmi Note 9Samsung Galaxy A21srealme 6iNokia 2.4Wiko View5Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
200%
102%
208%
8%
21%
-6%
39%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
66.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
64.46 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
62.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
52.7 (3.4 - 87.1, n=174)
-19%
51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564)
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
80 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
84.56 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
82.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
71.6 (8.2 - 96.5, n=174)
-13%
69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564)
-16%
Random Write 4KB
12.95
146.94
1035%
89.5
591%
150.87
1065%
22.5
74%
16.29
26%
19.8 (0.75 - 89.5, n=217)
53%
40.2 (0.14 - 319, n=935)
210%
Random Read 4KB
75.87
65.13
-14%
77.2
2%
73.46
-3%
46
-39%
49.56
-35%
41.7 (3.59 - 117, n=217)
-45%
63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=935)
-17%
Sequential Write 256KB
90.59
248.14
174%
104.3
15%
256.36
183%
119.5
32%
223.45
147%
97.1 (14.8 - 189, n=217)
7%
139 (2.99 - 1321, n=935)
53%
Sequential Read 256KB
298.23
306.57
3%
307
3%
309.45
4%
245.7
-18%
268.4
-10%
240 (25.8 - 452, n=217)
-20%
363 (12.1 - 2037, n=935)
22%
PUBG mobile
010203040Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø29.2 (10-31)
; Balanced: Ø22.5 (5-26)
Asphalt 9 Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø14.6 (7-23)
; Standard / low: Ø27.4 (5-31)
Hög belastning
 39.1 °C34.3 °C32 °C 
 39.6 °C34.1 °C32.4 °C 
 38.4 °C34 °C31.9 °C 
Max: 39.6 °C
Medel: 35.1 °C
30.4 °C33.1 °C37.5 °C
30.1 °C33.5 °C39.7 °C
30.2 °C33.2 °C38.2 °C
Max: 39.7 °C
Medel: 34 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  40.8 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.836.52537.531.83129.3304031.9345037.836.26329.126.78019.52110019.920.212516.522.816014.832.220013.131.125012.540.331510.847.140010.550.950014.852.26301455.680013.459.7100013.565.9125012.166.2160011.770.420001272.2250013.169.4315013.574.1400014.569500015.467.8630016.367.8800016.971.81000017.870.21250018.463.11600019.248.8SPL69.771.626.681.5N25.524.90.846.5median 14median 63.1Delta1.91336.934.52941.421.939.42241.729.942.82245.419.343.716.343.71445.816.951.314.952.514.155.91058.81163.111.768.210.97211.973.71180.110.279.711.478.912.879.512.980.912.581.71384.913.184.513.478.215.775.213.5761474.313.763.224.892.40.691.6median 13median 74.31.19.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A20sXiaomi Redmi Note 9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A20s audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.8 / 2.7 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.2 / 7.1 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A20s
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
5020 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A21s
5000 mAh
realme 6i
5000 mAh
Wiko View5
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
10%
-14%
31%
28%
8%
12%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.74
18%
1.5
-67%
0.37
59%
0.68
24%
0.793 (0.51 - 1.26, n=13)
12%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=926)
1%
Idle Average *
1.8
2.17
-21%
2.1
-17%
1.62
10%
1.94
-8%
2.3 (0.96 - 4.45, n=13)
-28%
1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=925)
2%
Idle Maximum *
2.7
2.2
19%
2.9
-7%
1.69
37%
1.96
27%
2.48 (0.99 - 4.51, n=13)
8%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=926)
24%
Load Average *
5.2
4.17
20%
4.6
12%
3.61
31%
2.62
50%
3.93 (1.85 - 7.1, n=13)
24%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=920)
21%
Load Maximum *
7.1
6.11
14%
6.6
7%
5.9
17%
3.81
46%
5.41 (3.04 - 8.8, n=13)
24%
6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=920)
14%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
35tim 45min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13tim 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15tim 54min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 38min
Samsung Galaxy A20s
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
5020 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A21s
5000 mAh
realme 6i
5000 mAh
Nokia 2.4
4500 mAh
Wiko View5
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
11%
7%
62%
2%
39%
Reader / Idle
2145
2294
7%
2009
-6%
H.264
954
1116
17%
1087
14%
WiFi v1.3
812
867
7%
943
16%
1318
62%
826
2%
1132
39%
Load
278
314
13%
287
3%

För

+ Bra hantverk
+ Ordentlig batteritid
+ Tre kortplatser

Emot

- Långsamt WLAN
- Mörk skärm med låg kontrast
- Prestandan

Omdöme för Samsung Galaxy A20s - Rejäl. Försynt. Onödig?

Recension av Samsung Galaxy A20s. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger.de
Recension av Samsung Galaxy A20s. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger.de

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

När Galaxy A20s släpptes skapade Samsung en egen konkurrent till Galaxy A21s, men egentligen är den ingen konkurrent alls. A20s visade sig vara för svag och för diskret för det - något färgen på plasten också symboliserar.

Vi får erkänna att vi hade svårt att hitta några egentliga styrkor med A20s. Samsungs smartphone är välkonstruerad och den ordentliga positioneringen talar för sig själv, även om vår testenhet led av några mindre brister. Vidare var batteritiden okej, men det beror främst på den svaga hårdvaran, vilket är typiskt för det här segmentet.

Det som oftast brukar vara en av Samsungs styrkor, skärmen (åtminstone när det gäller AMOLED-paneler), är tyvärr en svaghet i just Galaxy A-serien. Galaxy A20s har en mörk skärm och IPS-panelen skulle dessutom behöva högre kontrast - till och med för det här prisskiktet. Dessutom är prestandan från dess Snapdragon 450, en SoC från 2017, helt enkelt förkastlig trots att det rör sig om en billig telefon.

Snälla fall inte tillbaka i gamla spår Samsung. Ni kunde åtminstone ha räddat en av enheterna från trion A20e, A20s och A21s.

Som en instegstelefon är Samsung Galaxy A20s helt okej. Men det är få saker som talar för A20s vid jämförelse med A21s, som också går att köpa för ca 1.400 - 1.500 kronor. Den sistnämnda har en mer kraftfull SoC och en snabbare WLAN-modul.

Totalt sett är Redmi Note 9 betydligt starkare än Galaxy A20s. Den kostar för tillfället runt 1.500 kronor och är därför ett riktigt bra alternativ till Samsungs telefon.

Samsung Galaxy A20s - 11/14/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Design
80%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Mus
92%
Anslutningar
38 / 70 → 54%
Vikt
90%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
83%
Spelprestanda
6 / 64 → 10%
Programprestanda
42 / 86 → 49%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
68 / 90 → 76%
Camera
54%
Medel
69%
75%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy A20s - Med en Snapdragon SoC, är den bättre än Galaxy A21s?
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-11-30 (Update: 2020-11-30)