C 2018
Notebookcheck

Test: Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 Surfplatta (Sammanfattning)

Florian Wimmer, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Tanja Hinum (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 05/16/2018

Liten ljudexpert. Multimediaförmågor och bra kameror är fortfarande viktigt att överväga när man köper en dyr surfplatta. På papperet så har Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 allt det nödvändiga. Här får du reda på om den kan övertyga oss i testet.

Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (MediaPad Serie)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 960
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
8.4 tum 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixlar 359 PPI, kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 24 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, Ljudanslutningar: ljudutgång via USB C, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 256 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Sensorer: accelerationssensor, gyroskop, hall-sensor, aptX
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, 4G (1,3,4,5,7,8,12,17,18,19,20,26,34,38,39,40,41), 3G (850/​900/​1900/​2100), 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.3 x 212.6 x 124.8
Batteri
19.4 Wh, 5100 mAh Litiumpolymer, Quick Charge 9 V / 2 A
Operativsystem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, autofokus
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.2
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2 högtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt tangentbord, laddare, USB-kabel, USB C-ljudadapter, SIM-verktyg, HiCare, Game Suite, PhoneClone, 24 Månader Garanti, LTE-A Cat6 nerladdning: 300 MBit/s, ​uppladdning: 50 MBit/s; SAR-värde: 0,271 W/kg (huvud), 1,01 W/kg (kropp), fanless
Vikt
316 g, Strömförsörjning: 72 g
Pris
379 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
315 MBit/s ∼100% +55%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
209 MBit/s ∼66% +3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 32 GB eMMC Flash
203 MBit/s ∼64%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 MBit/s ∼32% -51%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.5 MBit/s ∼15% -77%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
260 MBit/s ∼100% +27%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
209 MBit/s ∼80% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 32 GB eMMC Flash
205 MBit/s ∼79%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
86 MBit/s ∼33% -58%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
41.5 MBit/s ∼16% -80%
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – gardens
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – gardens
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 – overview
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 – overview
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 – gardens
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 – gardens
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 – bridge
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Picture of test chart
Picture of test chart
Detail of test chart
Detail of test chart
Picture of ColorChecker: The original color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.
Picture of ColorChecker: The original color is displayed in the bottom half of each field.
382
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 408 cd/m² Medel: 391.9 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 403 cd/m²
Kontrast: 604:1 (Svärta: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.78 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 7.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.278
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Lenovo Tab 4 8
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
TFT LCD, 1280x800, 8
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4
Screen
-1%
9%
34%
16%
Brightness middle
405
419
3%
455
12%
509
26%
460
14%
Brightness
392
412
5%
446
14%
477
22%
445
14%
Brightness Distribution
92
91
-1%
91
-1%
91
-1%
90
-2%
Black Level *
0.67
0.39
42%
0.51
24%
0.48
28%
0.45
33%
Contrast
604
1074
78%
892
48%
1060
75%
1022
69%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.78
8.5
-47%
5.5
5%
3.45
40%
6.2
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.82
13.8
-41%
14.8
-51%
5.17
47%
10.5
-7%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.2
10.3
-43%
5.5
24%
4.5
37%
6.5
10%
Gamma
2.278 97%
2.6 85%
2.23 99%
2.11 104%
2.33 94%
CCT
8405 77%
6216 105%
7852 83%
7171 91%
8056 81%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2451 Hz ≤ 25 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2451 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2451 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8689 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
147597 Points ∼59%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (124087 - 157445, n=7)
143408 Points ∼57% -3%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
86735 Points ∼35% -41%
Average of class Tablet (14200 - 227987, n=59)
71242 Points ∼28% -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
45573 Points ∼18% -69%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
36893 Points ∼15% -75%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
34714 Points ∼14% -76%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
181614 Points ∼52%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (170015 - 181614, n=4)
174560 Points ∼50% -4%
Average of class Tablet (20856 - 201881, n=13)
117149 Points ∼34% -35%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (6006 - 6299, n=7)
6136 Points ∼60% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
6006 Points ∼58%
Average of class Tablet (2345 - 6315, n=25)
4305 Points ∼42% -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
3789 Points ∼37% -37%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
3312 Points ∼32% -45%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
2907 Points ∼28% -52%
Work performance score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (6830 - 7403, n=7)
7199 Points ∼54% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
7053 Points ∼53%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5204 Points ∼39% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4945 Points ∼37% -30%
Average of class Tablet (2529 - 7053, n=67)
4487 Points ∼34% -36%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
4457 Points ∼34% -37%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
4125 Points ∼31% -42%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1215 Points ∼70%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (913 - 1215, n=7)
1076 Points ∼62% -11%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1022 Points ∼59% -16%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
773 Points ∼45% -36%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 1628, n=95)
718 Points ∼41% -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
699 Points ∼40% -42%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
593 Points ∼34% -51%
Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
4143 Points ∼26%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (2284 - 4143, n=7)
3731 Points ∼24% -10%
Average of class Tablet (98 - 8602, n=95)
1548 Points ∼10% -63%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1302 Points ∼8% -69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
530 Points ∼3% -87%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
447 Points ∼3% -89%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
334 Points ∼2% -92%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
3985 Points ∼83%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (2778 - 4277, n=7)
3512 Points ∼73% -12%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2212 Points ∼46% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
1176 Points ∼25% -70%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 3985, n=95)
979 Points ∼20% -75%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
784 Points ∼16% -80%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
736 Points ∼15% -82%
System
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
3940 Points ∼32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (3572 - 4154, n=7)
3826 Points ∼31% -3%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
3581 Points ∼29% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
2337 Points ∼19% -41%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 6820, n=95)
1973 Points ∼16% -50%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
1477 Points ∼12% -63%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
1152 Points ∼9% -71%
Overall
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2982 Points ∼49%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (2204 - 2985, n=7)
2701 Points ∼44% -9%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1800 Points ∼30% -40%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 3302, n=95)
1080 Points ∼18% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
1005 Points ∼16% -66%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
796 Points ∼13% -73%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
640 Points ∼10% -79%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
11539 Points ∼80%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (9492 - 11539, n=4)
5258 (min: 9492, max: 11539) Points ∼36% -54%
Average of class Tablet (862 - 11575, n=21)
4008 Points ∼28% -65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
2369 Points ∼16% -79%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
1324 Points ∼9% -89%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
6509 Points ∼18%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (6173 - 6527, n=7)
6384 Points ∼18% -2%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 9358, n=33)
3915 Points ∼11% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
3710 Points ∼10% -43%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
1908 Points ∼5% -71%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
1683 Points ∼5% -74%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1896 Points ∼32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1852 - 1899, n=7)
1875 Points ∼32% -1%
Average of class Tablet (429 - 3933, n=33)
1384 Points ∼23% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
726 Points ∼12% -62%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
688 Points ∼12% -64%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
628 Points ∼11% -67%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2653 Points ∼63%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2322 Points ∼56% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1679 - 2653, n=7)
2181 Points ∼52% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
1721 Points ∼41% -35%
Average of class Tablet (793 - 2952, n=48)
1447 Points ∼35% -45%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
878 Points ∼21% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1646 - 2798, n=7)
2063 Points ∼38% +16%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1778 Points ∼33%
Average of class Tablet (102 - 5384, n=48)
1196 Points ∼22% -33%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
832 Points ∼15% -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
239 Points ∼4% -87%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
121 Points ∼2% -93%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1747 - 2666, n=7)
2064 Points ∼44% +8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1919 Points ∼41%
Average of class Tablet (134 - 3806, n=53)
1047 Points ∼22% -45%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
970 Points ∼20% -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
296 Points ∼6% -85%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
150 Points ∼3% -92%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2555 Points ∼62%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2261 Points ∼54% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1662 - 2555, n=7)
2086 Points ∼50% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
1522 Points ∼37% -40%
Average of class Tablet (810 - 2952, n=51)
1379 Points ∼33% -46%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
881 Points ∼21% -66%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
874 Points ∼21% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2501 Points ∼30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1856 - 2990, n=7)
2496 Points ∼30% 0%
Average of class Tablet (42 - 7525, n=51)
1630 Points ∼20% -35%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
997 Points ∼12% -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
399 Points ∼5% -84%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
193 Points ∼2% -92%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
42 Points ∼1% -98%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2513 Points ∼39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1865 - 2649, n=7)
2374 Points ∼37% -6%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 4588, n=55)
1288 Points ∼20% -49%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1139 Points ∼18% -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
477 Points ∼7% -81%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
234 Points ∼4% -91%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
53 Points ∼1% -98%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
15538 Points ∼20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (14456 - 15341, n=6)
15019 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
12947 Points ∼16%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 27021, n=135)
12770 Points ∼16%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
10458 Points ∼13%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
9274 Points ∼12%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (32243 - 38979, n=6)
35199 Points ∼7%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
22141 Points ∼5%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 110971, n=135)
16661 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
7720 Points ∼2%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
5496 Points ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5435 Points ∼1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (25766 - 28883, n=6)
27083 Points ∼13%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
20230 Points ∼10%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 54449, n=136)
14162 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
8481 Points ∼4%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
6144 Points ∼3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5986 Points ∼3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
78 fps ∼5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (43 - 93, n=7)
68.4 fps ∼4% -12%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
29 fps ∼2% -63%
Average of class Tablet (4.2 - 225, n=161)
24.6 fps ∼1% -68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
12 fps ∼1% -85%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
9.9 fps ∼1% -87%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
7.8 fps ∼0% -90%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (40 - 60, n=7)
53.9 fps ∼12% +6%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
51 fps ∼11%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
23 fps ∼5% -55%
Average of class Tablet (3.7 - 59.7, n=165)
19.2 fps ∼4% -62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
19 fps ∼4% -63%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
17 fps ∼4% -67%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
14 fps ∼3% -73%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
39 fps ∼7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (19 - 41, n=7)
31.7 fps ∼6% -19%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 110, n=99)
16.2 fps ∼3% -58%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
13 fps ∼2% -67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
5.1 fps ∼1% -87%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
3.6 fps ∼1% -91%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
2.8 fps ∼1% -93%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (20 - 37, n=7)
28.1 fps ∼8% +17%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
24 fps ∼7%
Average of class Tablet (2.9 - 58, n=102)
12.5 fps ∼3% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
9.2 fps ∼3% -62%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
9 fps ∼2% -62%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
7.1 fps ∼2% -70%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
5.9 fps ∼2% -75%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
27 fps ∼5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (21 - 28, n=7)
24 fps ∼4% -11%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 83, n=49)
15.4 fps ∼3% -43%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
7.7 fps ∼1% -71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
3.2 fps ∼1% -88%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
2.3 fps ∼0% -91%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (12 - 28, n=7)
18.6 fps ∼11% +33%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
14 fps ∼8%
Average of class Tablet (4.3 - 54.3, n=49)
10.5 fps ∼6% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
6.7 fps ∼4% -52%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5 fps ∼3% -64%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
4.2 fps ∼2% -70%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
16 fps ∼4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (15 - 16, n=7)
13.1 fps ∼3% -18%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 26.8, n=28)
8.47 fps ∼2% -47%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
4.8 fps ∼1% -70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
2 fps ∼1% -87%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (9.3 - 16, n=7)
12.2 fps ∼10% +31%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
9.3 fps ∼8%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 17.9, n=28)
5.87 fps ∼5% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
3.7 fps ∼3% -60%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
3.1 fps ∼3% -67%

Legend

 
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab 4 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
11404 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)
11338 Points ∼99%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (10016 - 11897, n=7)
10823 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 31188, n=152)
5858 Points ∼51% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4768 Points ∼42% -58%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
2903 Points ∼25% -74%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
2826 Points ∼25% -75%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)
184 Points ∼100%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (107 - 184, n=7)
148 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
136 Points ∼74% -26%
Average of class Tablet (36 - 257, n=68)
102 Points ∼55% -45%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
69 Points ∼38% -62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
67 Points ∼36% -64%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
57 Points ∼31% -69%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (56.8 - 68.6, n=7)
59.3 Points ∼100% +4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)
56.76 Points ∼96%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
53.7 Points ∼91% -5%
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 202, n=67)
49.7 Points ∼84% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
26.099 Points ∼44% -54%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
19.519 Points ∼33% -66%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
18.36 Points ∼31% -68%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
12033 ms * ∼100% -222%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
11817.6 ms * ∼98% -216%
Average of class Tablet (969 - 43092, n=163)
9429 ms * ∼78% -153%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
6785.6 ms * ∼56% -82%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)
3734 ms * ∼31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (2734 - 3734, n=7)
3226 ms * ∼27% +14%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
2822.9 ms * ∼23% +24%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4Amazon Fire HD 8 2017Lenovo Tab 4 8Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inchAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-58%
-30%
-39%
-36%
-36%
-61%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
70.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
34.15
-52%
61.1
-14%
64.3
-9%
23.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-67%
46.3 (3.4 - 87.1, n=106)
-35%
42.5 (14.6 - 73.8, n=41)
-40%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
51.06
-40%
84.8
0%
78.6
-7%
61.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-27%
65.5 (8.2 - 96.5, n=106)
-23%
60.8 (34.4 - 87.7, n=41)
-28%
Random Write 4KB
65.1
11.51
-82%
7.1
-89%
10.98
-83%
31.35
-52%
18.1 (0.75 - 77.3, n=145)
-72%
5.45 (0.13 - 77.9, n=190)
-92%
Random Read 4KB
62.8
21.55
-66%
44
-30%
25.96
-59%
32.04
-49%
35.9 (3.59 - 117, n=145)
-43%
17.4 (1.32 - 142, n=190)
-72%
Sequential Write 256KB
132.24
47.23
-64%
72.3
-45%
53.99
-59%
117.15
-11%
93.7 (14.8 - 189, n=145)
-29%
34.5 (2.04 - 208, n=190)
-74%
Sequential Read 256KB
268.62
159.08
-41%
265.1
-1%
218.05
-19%
249.68
-7%
229 (25.8 - 440, n=145)
-15%
103 (6.75 - 741, n=190)
-62%
Shadow Fight 3
 InställningarVärde
 high58 fps
 minimal58 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 InställningarVärde
 min58 fps
 high HD58 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Battle Bay
 InställningarVärde
 half resolution58 fps
 full resolution58 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Hög belastning
 35.6 °C35 °C35.7 °C 
 38.2 °C35.1 °C36.4 °C 
 37.3 °C34.9 °C36 °C 
Max: 38.2 °C
Medel: 36 °C
34.7 °C35.3 °C35.5 °C
34.7 °C35.3 °C36.1 °C
35.4 °C35.3 °C36.4 °C
Max: 36.4 °C
Medel: 35.4 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  34.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 22.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.630.92531.539.73136.135.84030.240.65033.842.76328.432.38026.628.310024.427.212521.934.416020.44620019.456.425020.463.431517.565.540018.16850017.369.46301669.680016.170.3100015.571125015.273.6160015.175.820001574.925001576.1315014.976.1400015.172.3500015.170.7630015.367.2800015.266.21000015.264.61250015.263.31600015.259.2SPL27.785N161.7median 15.3median 68Delta1.86.731.638.825.437.225.328.932.930.833.641.731.632.828.429.22722.620.828.62242.921.349.920.851.121.260.119.46719.570.417.771.417.972.617.875.517.375.317.475.516.775.317.277.818.281.717.979.317.670.917.765.917.867.717.962.718.151.918.247.730881.369.4median 17.9median 67.71.312.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MediaPad M5 8.4Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 1.5 / 0.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 2.1 / 3.74 / 4.33 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 6.32 / 9.13 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
5100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 8
4850 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4450 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5100 mAh
Power Consumption
36%
23%
35%
7%
Idle Minimum *
2.1
0.99
53%
1.1
48%
0.89
58%
1.51
28%
Idle Average *
3.74
2.74
27%
3.51
6%
3.13
16%
3.64
3%
Idle Maximum *
4.33
2.83
35%
4.14
4%
3.36
22%
3.68
15%
Load Average *
6.32
4.51
29%
4.86
23%
3.93
38%
6.95
-10%
Load Maximum *
9.13
5.69
38%
6.13
33%
5.45
40%
9.11
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
19tim 14min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10tim 27min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11tim 41min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 58min
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
5100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 8
4850 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4450 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5100 mAh
Battery Runtime
34%
-11%
16%
-11%
Reader / Idle
1154
2032
76%
1207
5%
1357
18%
1110
-4%
H.264
701
744
6%
603
-14%
493
-30%
583
-17%
WiFi v1.3
627
770
23%
452
-28%
895
43%
546
-13%
Load
298
393
32%
276
-7%
396
33%
268
-10%

För

+ hög prestanda
+ högupplöst skärm
+ bra LTE-modem med telefonfunktion
+ klarar av smidigt spelande
+ bra kameror
+ batteritiden är lämplig för vardagslivet
+ robust hölje med bra konstruktionskvalitet

Emot

- den tryckkänsliga skärmen är oexakt runt kanterna
- ingen 3.5 mm ljudanslutning
- stark blå ton på skärmen
- mycket bloatware
- liten intern lagring
- energiförbrukningen är ganska hög
- stryps vid belastning
Testing the Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4. Test unit provided by Huawei Germany.
Testing the Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4. Test unit provided by Huawei Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Med MediaPad M5 8.4 så släpper Huawei en ganska elegant surfplatta som är värd sitt aningen höga pris. Detta garanteras av bra kameror, en högupplöst skärm, kraftfulla högtalare och en del gimmicks såsom möjligheten att ringa telefonsamtal. Den har bra prestanda och det ergonomiska, högkvalitativa höljet känns bra i handen.

Men du får klara dig utan en klassisk ljudanslutning på MediaPad M5 8.4 och ibland är den tryckkänsliga skärmen aningen oexakt mot kanterna. Dessutom har skärmen en kraftig blå ton, men den går att reducera med dom inbyggda verktygen. Även om ett extra microSD-kort kan hjälpa till att utöka den smått dimensionerade interna lagringen så går det i princip inte att göra något alls åt den höga energiförbrukningen. Som tur är har den ändå en respektabel batteritid, så den höga energiförbrukningen gör inte så mycket. Det värsta är nog den markanta strypning som uppstår vid längre belastning.

Ett bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda samt många fördelar såsom kamerabilder med rik detalj och ett utmärkt hölje gör att MediaPad M5 8.4 förtjänar en köprekommendation.

Totalt sett så får MediaPad M5 8.4 en köprekommendation från oss, då det är en enhet med bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda som ser ut att vara av hög kvalitet och som inte har några allt för stora svagheter.

Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 - 05/07/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Design
90%
Tangentbord
69 / 80 → 87%
Mus
82%
Anslutningar
43 / 65 → 66%
Vikt
86 / 40-88 → 96%
Batteri
93%
Skärm
82%
Spelprestanda
52 / 68 → 77%
Programprestanda
63 / 76 → 82%
Temperatur
90%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
72 / 91 → 79%
Camera
68 / 85 → 79%
Medel
76%
87%
Tablet - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 Surfplatta (Sammanfattning)
Florian Wimmer, 2018-05-16 (Update: 2018-05-16)