Test: Lenovo Tab 4 8 Surfplatta (Sammanfattning)

Name: Test: Lenovo Tab 4 8 Surfplatta (Sammanfattning)
Item: Lenovo Tab 4 8
Rating: 79
Author: Florian Wimmer

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Tanja Hinum (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 10/25/2017

Android ARM Tablet Touchscreen

Familjevänlig. Lenovos Tab 4 8 marknadsförs som en surfplatta för hela familjen och försöker uppnå detta med hjälp av valfria tillbehör. Få reda på om plattan själv är värd pengarna i vår recension.

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» T opp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones

Size Comparison

Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch Lenovo Tab 4 8 Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	209 MBit/s ∼100% +349%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash	99.3 MBit/s ∼48% +114%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.3 MBit/s ∼24% +6%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	46.5 MBit/s ∼22%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	209 MBit/s ∼100% +404%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash	86 MBit/s ∼41% +107%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	50.9 MBit/s ∼24% +23%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash	41.5 MBit/s ∼20%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


442 cd/m²	469 cd/m²	445 cd/m²
441 cd/m²	455 cd/m²	443 cd/m²
441 cd/m²	453 cd/m²	429 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 469 cd/m² Medel: 446.4 cd/m² Minimum: 6.58 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 455 cd/m²
Kontrast: 892:1 (Svärta: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
80.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23

	Lenovo Tab 4 8 IPS, 1280x800, 8	Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 IPS, 1280x800, 8	Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A IPS, 1280x800, 8	Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4	Lenovo Tab 4 10 IPS, 1280x800, 10.1
Screen		-13%	5%	3%	15%
Brightness middle	455	419 -8%	363 -20%	460 1%	316 -31%
Brightness	446	412 -8%	348 -22%	445 0%	305 -32%
Brightness Distribution	91	91 0%	90 -1%	90 -1%	86 -5%
Black Level *	0.51	0.39 24%	0.26 49%	0.45 12%	0.2 61%
Contrast	892	1074 20%	1396 57%	1022 15%	1580 77%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	5.5	8.5 -55%	5.8 -5%	6.2 -13%	5 9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	14.8	13.8 7%	17.8 -20%	10.5 29%	8.7 41%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	5.5	10.3 -87%	5.5 -0%	6.5 -18%	5.7 -4%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.6 ^85%	2.24 ^98%	2.33 ^94%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	7852 ^83%	6216 ^105%	7388 ^88%	8056 ^81%	7921 ^82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8689 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 25 ms rise
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	86735 Points ∼35% +135%
Lenovo Tab 4 8	36893 Points ∼15%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	36868 Points ∼15% 0%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	36440 Points ∼15% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	34714 Points ∼14% -6%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Lenovo Tab 4 8	3312 Points ∼32%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	3307 Points ∼32% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	2907 Points ∼28% -12%
Work performance score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	5204 Points ∼39% +17%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	4518 Points ∼34% +1%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	4507 Points ∼34% +1%
Lenovo Tab 4 8	4457 Points ∼34%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	4125 Points ∼31% -7%

BaseMark OS II
Web
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	1022 Points ∼59% +32%
Lenovo Tab 4 8	773 Points ∼45%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	745 Points ∼43% -4%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	655 Points ∼38% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	593 Points ∼34% -23%
Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	1302 Points ∼8% +191%
Lenovo Tab 4 8	447 Points ∼3%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	444 Points ∼3% -1%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	339 Points ∼2% -24%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	334 Points ∼2% -25%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	2212 Points ∼46% +182%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	908 Points ∼19% +16%
Lenovo Tab 4 8	784 Points ∼16%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	758 Points ∼16% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	736 Points ∼15% -6%
System
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	3581 Points ∼29% +142%
Lenovo Tab 4 8	1477 Points ∼12%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	1475 Points ∼12% 0%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	1271 Points ∼10% -14%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	1152 Points ∼9% -22%
Overall
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	1800 Points ∼30% +126%
Lenovo Tab 4 8	796 Points ∼13%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	780 Points ∼13% -2%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	712 Points ∼12% -11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	640 Points ∼10% -20%

Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score
Lenovo Tab 4 10	1398 Points ∼10% +6%
Lenovo Tab 4 8	1324 Points ∼9%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Lenovo Tab 4 8	1908 Points ∼5%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	1896 Points ∼5% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	1683 Points ∼5% -12%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Lenovo Tab 4 8	688 Points ∼12%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	676 Points ∼11% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	628 Points ∼11% -9%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	2322 Points ∼56%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	878 Points ∼21%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	793 Points ∼19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	832 Points ∼15%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	121 Points ∼2%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	116 Points ∼2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	970 Points ∼20%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	150 Points ∼3%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	143 Points ∼3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	2261 Points ∼54% +159%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	920 Points ∼22% +5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	881 Points ∼21% +1%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	880 Points ∼21% +1%
Lenovo Tab 4 8	874 Points ∼21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	997 Points ∼12% +2274%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	203 Points ∼2% +383%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	193 Points ∼2% +360%
Lenovo Tab 4 8	42 Points ∼1%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	42 Points ∼1% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	1139 Points ∼18% +2049%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	246 Points ∼4% +364%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	234 Points ∼4% +342%
Lenovo Tab 4 8	53 Points ∼1%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	53 Points ∼1% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	15538 Points ∼20% +49%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	10857 Points ∼14% +4%
Lenovo Tab 4 8	10458 Points ∼13%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	10388 Points ∼13% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	9274 Points ∼12% -11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	22141 Points ∼5% +303%
Lenovo Tab 4 8	5496 Points ∼1%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	5456 Points ∼1% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	5435 Points ∼1% -1%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	5326 Points ∼1% -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	20230 Points ∼10% +229%
Lenovo Tab 4 8	6144 Points ∼3%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	6100 Points ∼3% -1%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	6006 Points ∼3% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	5986 Points ∼3% -3%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	29 fps ∼2% +272%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	10 fps ∼1% +28%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	9.9 fps ∼1% +27%
Lenovo Tab 4 8	7.8 fps ∼0%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	7.7 fps ∼0% -1%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	23 fps ∼5% +64%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	17 fps ∼4% +21%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	17 fps ∼4% +21%
Lenovo Tab 4 8	14 fps ∼3%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	13 fps ∼3% -7%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	13 fps ∼2% +364%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	3.6 fps ∼1% +29%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	3.6 fps ∼1% +29%
Lenovo Tab 4 8	2.8 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	2.8 fps ∼1% 0%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	9 fps ∼2% +53%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	7.2 fps ∼2% +22%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	7.1 fps ∼2% +20%
Lenovo Tab 4 8	5.9 fps ∼2%
Lenovo Tab 4 10	5.5 fps ∼2% -7%

Legend

Lenovo Tab 4 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Tab 4 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)	11404 Points ∼100% +293%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 (Chrome 60)	2955 Points ∼26% +2%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)	2903 Points ∼25%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)	2826 Points ∼25% -3%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A (Chrome 52.0.2743.91)	2821 Points ∼25% -3%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)	136 Points ∼100% +97%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)	69 Points ∼51%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 (Chrome 60)	62 Points ∼46% -10%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A (Chrome 52.0.2743.91)	57 Points ∼42% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)	57 Points ∼42% -17%

JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)	53.7 Points ∼100% +192%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)	19.519 Points ∼36% +6%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A (Chrome 52.0.2743.91)	19.3 Points ∼36% +5%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)	18.36 Points ∼34%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Tab 4 10 (Chrome 60)	12386 ms * ∼100% -3%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A (Chrome 52.0.2743.91)	12160.7 ms * ∼98% -1%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)	12033 ms * ∼97%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)	11817.6 ms * ∼95% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)	2822.9 ms * ∼23% +77%

* ... smaller is better

	Lenovo Tab 4 8	Amazon Fire HD 8 2017	Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A	Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch	Lenovo Tab 4 10
AndroBench 3-5		-25%	-38%	47%	-6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	61.1	34.15 -44%	24.9 -59%	23.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -62%	59.9 -2%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	84.8	51.06 -40%	35.2 -58%	61.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -27%	84.5 0%
Random Write 4KB	7.1	11.51 62%	8.35 18%	31.35 342%	8.9 25%
Random Read 4KB	44	21.55 -51%	21.96 -50%	32.04 -27%	32.3 -27%
Sequential Write 256KB	72.3	47.23 -35%	45.71 -37%	117.15 62%	45.3 -37%
Sequential Read 256KB	265.1	159.08 -40%	158.44 -40%	249.68 -6%	275 4%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Inställningar	Värde
	high	18 fps
	very low	30 fps

... jämför

Dead Trigger 2
	Inställningar	Värde
	high	30 fps

... jämför

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


35.8 °C	31.2 °C	34.6 °C
38.5 °C	32.1 °C	35.1 °C
31.8 °C	33.2 °C	35.2 °C

Max: 38.5 °C
Medel: 34.2 °C


32 °C	32.2 °C	37.7 °C
33 °C	31.8 °C	40.1 °C
32 °C	31.8 °C	36.3 °C

Max: 40.1 °C
Medel: 34.1 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 43.7 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-350

Lenovo Tab 4 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.12 / 0.16 Watt
Låg belastning	1.1 / 3.51 / 4.14 Watt
Hög belastning	4.86 / 6.13 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo Tab 4 8 4850 mAh	Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 mAh	Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A 4000 mAh	Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch 5100 mAh	Lenovo Tab 4 10 7000 mAh
Power Consumption		16%	13%	-24%	-3%
Idle Minimum *	1.1	0.99 10%	1.32 -20%	1.51 -37%	1.09 1%
Idle Average *	3.51	2.74 22%	2.71 23%	3.64 -4%	3.71 -6%
Idle Maximum *	4.14	2.83 32%	2.83 32%	3.68 11%	3.84 7%
Load Average *	4.86	4.51 7%	4.24 13%	6.95 -43%	5.07 -4%
Load Maximum *	6.13	5.69 7%	5.01 18%	9.11 -49%	6.88 -12%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		20tim 07min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		7tim 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10tim 03min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		4tim 36min

	Lenovo Tab 4 8 4850 mAh	Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 mAh	Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A 4000 mAh	Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch 5100 mAh	Lenovo Tab 4 10 7000 mAh
Battery Runtime		51%	5%	2%	40%
Reader / Idle	1207	2032 68%	1305 8%	1110 -8%
H.264	603	744 23%	624 3%	583 -3%
WiFi v1.3	452	770 70%	472 4%	546 21%	632 40%
Load	276	393 42%	287 4%	268 -3%

För

+ ergonomiskt designat skal

+ hyfsade framåtriktade högtalare

+ ljusstark skärm med bred betraktningsvinkel

+ jämförelsevis sval

+ ren Android med användarkonto-hantering

+ tämligen exakt GPS

+ smidig att använda

+ snabba lagringsenheter

Emot

- långsam GPS-låsning

- blå färgton

- foton blir ibland suddiga

- ingen sensor för omgivande ljus

- långsam Wi-Fi

Lenovo Tab 4 8. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Lenovos Tab 4 8 är en prisvärd surfplatta som misslyckas med att stå ut. Dess design är ganska återhållsam och konservativ, skalet är mottagligt för vridning och tryck och kameraupplösning, bildkvalitet, prestanda och anslutbarhet är typiska för dess klass.

Med andra ord: Lenovos surfplatta är inte speciell på något vis men är samtidigt pålitlig på många sätt. Den ljusstarka skärmens betraktningsvinkel är superb, dess GPS är exakt och enheten blir inte särskilt varm under belastning. Dom framåtriktade högtalarna, dess rena version av Android och dess stor batteri (som Lenovo dock inte lyckats krama någon extra batteritid ur) är särskilt noterbara. Den kan göras barnsäker med valfria tillbehör och vi vill återigen betona faktumet att tvärt emot många andra tillverkade så har Lenovo faktiskt spenderat tid, pengar och energi på att fundera över hur man kan förbättra en billig surfplatta med tillbehör.

Lenovo Tab 4 8 är en pålitlig 8-tums surfplatta utan några särskilda finesser men som har en solid prestanda i övrigt.

Allt som allt, surfplattor som Lenovos Yoga-serie är mycket mer innovativa än Tab 4 8. Men den senare erbjuder pålitlig prestanda utan några egentliga brister för ett hyfsat pris.

Lenovo Tab 4 8 - 2017-10-0610/06/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Design

74%

Tangentbord

65 / 80 → 82%

Mus

83%

Anslutningar

27 / 65 → 41%

Vikt

86 / 40-88 → 96%

Batteri

91%

Skärm

83%

Spelprestanda

6 / 68 → 9%

Programprestanda

39 / 76 → 52%

Temperatur

90%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

61 / 91 → 67%

Camera

62 / 85 → 73%

Medel

67%

79%

Tablet - Vägt medel

Test: Lenovo Tab 4 8 Surfplatta (Sammanfattning)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Lenovo Tab 4 8 audio analysis

Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A audio analysis

För

Emot

Pricecompare