Notebookcheck

Test: Huawei MateBook X (i5-7200U, 256 GB) (sammanfattning)

Sven Kloevekorn, 08/17/2017

Novis med avancerad teknik. Huaweis första laptop i det just nu populära 3:2-formatet, väcker uppmärksamhet med sitt chassi och sin utmärkta skärm. Det innovativa kylsystemet är särskilt intressant, men vi hade problem med inmatningsenheterna och batteritiden i synnerhet.

Huawei MateBook X (MateBook Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i5-7200U
Grafikkort
Intel HD Graphics 620, Kärna: 300 - 1000 MHz, Minne: 1866 MHz, delat minne, 21.20.16.4664
Minne
8192 MB 
, LPDDR3, dual channel, fastlött, ej utökningsbart
Skärm
13.3 tum 16:9, 2160x1440 pixlar 195 PPI, Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, glansig: ja
Moderkort
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Hårddisk
LITEON CB1-SD256, 256 GB 
, 256 GB / 512 GB SSD, 195 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare
Nätverk
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 12.5 x 286 x 211
Batteri
40 Wh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Övrigt
Tangentbord: chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, fanless
Vikt
1.05 kg

 

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a loyal reader of notebookcheck? Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Especially wanted: 
English-Swedish-Translator - 
Details here
News Editor - Details here

Review Editor - 
Details here

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Size Comparison

Left side: USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C with charge function, audio in/out (Photo by Huawei, our own picture came out badly)
Left side: USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C with charge function, audio in/out (Photo by Huawei, our own picture came out badly)
Right side: USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C with DisplayPort
Right side: USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C with DisplayPort
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
608 MBit/s ∼100% +17%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
577 MBit/s ∼95% +11%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
525 MBit/s ∼86% +1%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
520 MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
644 MBit/s ∼100%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
618 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
614 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
575 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
403
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
403
cd/m²
380
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 409 cd/m² Medel: 395.1 cd/m² Minimum: 6.3 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 408 cd/m²
Kontrast: 907:1 (Svärta: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.55 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 1.91 | - Ø
96% sRGB (Argyll) 61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.34
Huawei MateBook X
Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 2160x1440, 13.3
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
Sharp SHP1465, , 3200x1800, 13.3
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
LG Philips LP133WF4-SPB1 (LGD04EF), , 1920x1080, 13.3
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3
Response Times
-18%
-19%
-29%
-24%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
33 (15, 18)
42.4 (17.2, 25.2)
-28%
32.8 (16, 16.8)
1%
45 (12, 33)
-36%
42 (20, 22)
-27%
Response Time Black / White *
24 (12, 12)
25.6 (11.6, 14)
-7%
33.2 (10.8, 22.4)
-38%
29 (6, 23)
-21%
29 (18, 11)
-21%
PWM Frequency
21000
Screen
-26%
-66%
-34%
-6%
Brightness
395
369
-7%
325
-18%
306
-23%
401
2%
Brightness Distribution
88
85
-3%
89
1%
81
-8%
88
0%
Black Level *
0.45
0.35
22%
0.195
57%
0.3
33%
0.29
36%
Contrast
907
1146
26%
1801
99%
1143
26%
1438
59%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.55
3.5
-126%
7.4
-377%
4.73
-205%
3.63
-134%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.91
4.13
-116%
6.71
-251%
3.29
-72%
2.18
-14%
Gamma
2.34 103%
2.28 105%
2.74 88%
2.36 102%
3.09 78%
CCT
6491 100%
6508 100%
7222 90%
6437 101%
6767 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61
61.56
1%
50.48
-17%
54
-11%
63
3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96
94.64
-1%
73.31
-24%
83
-14%
99
3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-22% / -24%
-43% / -57%
-32% / -33%
-15% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel Core i5-7300U
141 Points ∼100% +22%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
124 Points ∼88% +7%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Core i5-7200U
116 Points ∼82%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
Intel Core m7-6Y75
114 Points ∼81% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
Intel Core i7-7500U
110 Points ∼78% -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel Core i5-7300U
334 Points ∼100% +4%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Core i5-7200U
322 Points ∼96%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel Core i5-7200U
318 Points ∼95% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
Intel Core i7-7500U
293 Points ∼88% -9%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
Intel Core m7-6Y75
283 Points ∼85% -12%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
322 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
116 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
4568 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei MateBook X
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, LITEON CB1-SD256
4276 Points ∼94%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4184 Points ∼92% -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
3983 Points ∼87% -7%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-512G-1006
3784 Points ∼83% -12%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
3535 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei MateBook X
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, LITEON CB1-SD256
3507 Points ∼99%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3147 Points ∼89% -10%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
2936 Points ∼83% -16%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-512G-1006
2838 Points ∼80% -19%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3507 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4276 poäng
Hjälp
Huawei MateBook X
LITEON CB1-SD256
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-512G-1006
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-21%
41%
117%
30%
Write 4k QD32
257.5
192.8
-25%
218.3
-15%
321.4
25%
373
45%
Read 4k QD32
498.9
311.3
-38%
479.2
-4%
407.5
-18%
423
-15%
Write 4k
68.14
75.91
11%
116.9
72%
121.5
78%
125
83%
Read 4k
29.48
30.34
3%
29.31
-1%
54.75
86%
46
56%
Write 512
310.3
335.3
8%
439.9
42%
1244
301%
445
43%
Read 512
504.2
239.9
-52%
1036
105%
1165
131%
225
-55%
Write Seq
461.2
348.7
-24%
732.6
59%
1472
219%
853
85%
Read Seq
740.6
387.5
-48%
1233
66%
1577
113%
723
-2%
LITEON CB1-SD256
Sequential Read: 740.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 461.2 MB/s
512K Read: 504.2 MB/s
512K Write: 310.3 MB/s
4K Read: 29.48 MB/s
4K Write: 68.14 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 498.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 257.5 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
2447 Points ∼100% +60%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1545 Points ∼63% +1%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1528 Points ∼62%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75
1132 Points ∼46% -26%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
1940 Points ∼100% +122%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
963 Points ∼50% +10%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75
892 Points ∼46% +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
889 Points ∼46% +2%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
875 Points ∼45%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
13075 Points ∼100% +73%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
8177 Points ∼63% +8%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
7542 Points ∼58%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
7265 Points ∼56% -4%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75
6684 Points ∼51% -11%
3DMark 11 Performance
1667 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
54224 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5691 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
785 poäng
Hjälp
låg med. hög ultra
Battlefield 1 (2016) 11.7fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 61.240.814fps
For Honor (2017) 20.2fps
Stress test: Prime95 + FurMark
Stress test: Prime95 + FurMark
Låg belastning
 26.5 °C26.1 °C25.7 °C 
 25 °C25.5 °C25.1 °C 
 24.5 °C24 °C25.1 °C 
Max: 26.5 °C
Medel: 25.3 °C
26.6 °C26.5 °C26.9 °C
26.1 °C26.2 °C26.4 °C
25.5 °C25.5 °C25.5 °C
Max: 26.9 °C
Medel: 26.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  34.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 23 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.435.335.42537.234.637.23137.932.237.94042.632.342.65041.93141.96341.829.841.88044.727.244.71004627.34612545.425.245.416048.82448.820051.923.951.925053.722.853.731562.322.162.340064.420.864.45006620.36663063.819.563.880058.51958.5100058.317.758.3125055.817.455.8160057.616.857.6200062.216.862.2250062.516.662.5315059.216.659.2400058.216.658.250006116.661630063.316.763.3800059.416.759.41000054.116.954.11250052.916.952.9160004716.847SPL72.829.972.8N33.11.333.1median 58.3Huawei MateBook Xmedian 17.4median 58.3Delta5.22.35.238.436.935.938.435.936.83335.936.236.835.936.23838.835.43835.535.935.135.535.335.634.835.33637.136.3363737.738.8373939.538.63937.933.131.737.949.940.331.149.957.346.531.357.363.253.430.563.267.857.229.467.871.961.528.371.976.366.427.876.37666.227.47675.164.826.675.171.460.826.571.476.866.826.376.87463.525.87473.86325.773.87564.625.47571.160.425.371.170.159.525.470.167.25925.367.271.160.924.971.168.458.925.168.465.655.625.865.660.649.624.660.6median 70.1HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EAmedian 59.5median 26.5median 70.17.772.67.736.336.236.336.137.436.134.832.734.834.431.434.432.433.132.433.232.433.236.331.936.336.729.536.742.230.142.252.527.652.552.527.752.556.726.856.756.82756.856.725.756.755.224.955.26124.36160.523.960.561.423.761.461.423.361.459.723.259.759.822.759.855.922.755.950.722.750.757.722.757.758.422.758.454.222.854.255.122.855.153.622.753.649.722.749.741.122.941.170.435.570.4282.528median 55.9Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5median 23.3median 55.93.72.23.732.634.232.642.241.242.24443.34435.836.535.83235.63230.828.830.828.727.828.729.726.429.729.225.629.232.323.832.334.523.634.546.122.346.158.121.458.164.720.764.763.820.363.864.71964.775.718.675.769.518.169.562.717.962.765.217.865.265.117.665.162.517.662.559.618.159.657.218.157.25818.35857.918.557.953.418.453.459.718.559.767.218.367.267.618.367.67830.67838.71.538.7median 59.7Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKBmedian 18.5median 59.77.71.97.736353637.428.237.435.825.435.83729.83737.928.537.940.728.940.740.429.140.440.928.940.943.528.443.545274548.723.848.75022.75056.721.956.758.320.958.358.120.558.162.219.562.264.918.464.960.818.260.860.917.860.961.21861.267.817.867.865.217.865.260.317.960.35817.95855.81855.856.71856.757.117.957.156.117.856.145.117.745.142.517.842.57430.77432.31.532.3median 57.1Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5median 18median 57.15.92.15.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei MateBook X audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.35 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.64 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 4.6 / 11 / 12 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 39.5 / 34.6 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MateBook X
7200U, HD Graphics 620, LITEON CB1-SD256, , 2160x1440, 13.3
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-512G-1006, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Power Consumption
20%
38%
10%
28%
Idle Minimum *
4.6
4
13%
4.1
11%
3.6
22%
3.6
22%
Idle Average *
11
8
27%
4.2
62%
7.4
33%
8.1
26%
Idle Maximum *
12
8.6
28%
5.1
57%
8.7
27%
8.7
27%
Load Average *
39.5
26.5
33%
22.1
44%
43
-9%
25.5
35%
Load Maximum *
34.6
34.8
-1%
29.4
15%
42
-21%
23.5
32%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
8tim 32min
Surfa med WLAN v1.3
5tim 37min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 42min
Huawei MateBook X
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 40 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
7500U, GeForce 940MX, 46 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
7300U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Battery Runtime
0%
84%
-18%
77%
Reader / Idle
512
618
21%
1295
153%
468
-9%
1054
106%
WiFi v1.3
337
305
-9%
677
101%
338
0%
744
121%
Load
162
144
-11%
157
-3%
89
-45%
168
4%
H.264
377

För

+ välbyggt chassi som ser bra ut...
+ ...med mycket styvt lock
+ kompakta, mycket små ramar
+ 3:2-format
+ genomtänkt adapter ingår
+ DisplayPort via USB-C
+ fingeravtrycksläsare i strömknappen
+ TPM 2.0
+ passivt kyld, helt tyst
+ mycket ljusstark och färgriktig skärm
+ skapligt ljud

Emot

- själva enheten har bara 2 st USB 3.1 Gen1 Typ-C
- inget Kensington, ingen kortläsare
- tangentbordet är lite svampigt
- kontrasten är inte optimal
- reflektiv skärm
- knappt användbar utomhus
- massiv CPU/GPU-strypning under utdragen, hög belastning
- CPU-hastigheten är alltid 3,1 GHz utan belastning
- medioker batteritid
The Huawei MateBook X - provided by notebooksbilliger.de
The Huawei MateBook X - provided by notebooksbilliger.de

Läs hela testet på engelska här.

Enligt vår uppfattning är Huaweis debut på laptopmarknaden lyckad. Den välbyggda MateBook X, i det alltmer populära formatet 3:2, är kompakt, robust, ser bra ut och har ett nytt passivt MEPCM-kylsystem. Det sistnämnda är tillräckligt effektivt under normal drift, även om det når sina gränser under konstant belastning. De tillgängliga säkerhetsfunktionerna, som fingeravtryckssensor och TPM 2.0, understryker den mobila aspekten. 

Det går kanske att vänja sig vid tangentbordet, som med sin svampiga återkoppling inte var optimalt för testaren. Den för höga energiförbrukningen – och därmed den dåliga batteritiden – kan eventuellt lösas med en BIOS- eller UEFI-uppdatering, då det verkar vara ett mjukvaruproblem. Pekplattan var ett annat aber.

Att anslutningsmöjligheterna ofta tvingar dig att använda den medföljande adaptern är en annan invändning, eftersom du inte får glömma den hemma. Visserligen hade inte chassikonceptet varit genomförbart på något annat sätt. De enda svagheterna i den överlag utmärkta skärmen är dess något höga svärta och naturligtvis den reflekterande ytan.

Om Huawei kunde få grepp om den höga energiförbrukningen och den därför låga batteritiden skulle MateBook X få ett ännu bättre betyg, men den når ändå upp i 87%, vilket trots allt är utmärkt. 

Huawei MateBook X - 07/26/2017 v6
Sven Kloevekorn

Design
91 /  98 → 92%
Tangentbord
84%
Mus
84%
Anslutningar
41 / 80 → 51%
Vikt
74 / 78 → 92%
Batteri
86%
Skärm
89%
Spelprestanda
53 / 68 → 79%
Programprestanda
75 / 87 → 86%
Temperatur
92 / 91 → 100%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
73 / 85 → 85%
Medel
78%
88%
Subnotebook - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Huawei MateBook X (i5-7200U, 256 GB) (sammanfattning)
Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-08-17 (Update: 2017-08-17)