Notebookcheck

Test: Honor 5C (smartphone) (sammanfattning)

Florian Wimmer, 08/13/2016

It's an honor. En superb skärm och en skaplig kamera i ett metallchassi, med prislapp på under 2 000 kr. 5,2-tummaren Honor 5C gör ett riktigt positivt första intryck i vårt test, men är allt lika bra?

Honor 5C (5 Serie)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 650 2 GHz
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Minne
2048 MB 
Skärm
5.2 tum 16:9, 1920x1080 pixlar 424 PPI, kapacitiv pekskärm, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.46 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: Headset, Kortläsare: micro-SD max 128 GB (i andra SIM-platsen), NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: accelerometer, närhetssensor, kompass, WiFi Direct
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1 LE, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B7/​B8/​B20); maxhastighet 150 GBit/s (ned), 50 GBit/s (upp); SAR: 1.12 W/kg (huvud), 0.42 W/kg (kropp), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.3 x 147.1 x 73.8
Batteri
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.0, AF, LED-blixt, video @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0
Övrigt
Högtalare: Högtalare nedtill, Tangentbord: virtuellt, HiCare, Health, phone manager, kompass, filhanterare, 24 Månader Garanti, FM-radio, fanless
Vikt
156 g, Strömförsörjning: 47 g
Pris
199 Kr

 

Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Networking
453%
326%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
49.8
303
508%
249
400%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
58.3
290
397%
205
252%
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Riverside
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Riverside
GPS Honor 5C: Overview
GPS Honor 5C: Overview
GPS Honor 5C: Crossing
GPS Honor 5C: Crossing
GPS Honor 5C: Riverside
GPS Honor 5C: Riverside

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
509
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
505
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 515 cd/m² Medel: 498.4 cd/m² Minimum: 5.75 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 515 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1051:1 (Svärta: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.28
Honor 5C
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
HTC Desire 530
IPS, 1280x720, 5
LG X Screen
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2
OnePlus X
Active Matrix OLED, 1920x1080, 5
Huawei P9 Lite
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Honor 5X
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
11%
0%
11%
-13%
-5%
13%
Brightness
498
376
-24%
376
-24%
291
-42%
314
-37%
468
-6%
521
5%
Brightness Distribution
93
91
-2%
90
-3%
96
3%
91
-2%
88
-5%
85
-9%
Black Level *
0.49
0.32
35%
0.27
45%
0.74
-51%
0.43
12%
Contrast
1051
1172
12%
1452
38%
682
-35%
1244
18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.2
6
3%
7.5
-21%
4.7
24%
6.28
-1%
4.1
34%
4.88
21%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.4
4.5
39%
9.9
-34%
3
59%
8.24
-11%
4.9
34%
5.2
30%
Gamma
2.28 105%
2.26 106%
2.07 116%
2.03 118%
2.12 113%
2.5 96%
2.26 106%
CCT
8664 75%
6975 93%
9704 67%
6291 103%
8145 80%
7116 91%
7766 84%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 11.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (44.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 60 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 965 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 30860) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C
53143 Points ∼29%
OnePlus X
52463 Points ∼28% -1%
HTC Desire 530
23561 Points ∼13% -56%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
27232 Points ∼15% -49%
LG X Screen
22955 Points ∼12% -57%
Huawei P9 Lite
50366 Points ∼27% -5%
Honor 5X
37152 Points ∼20% -30%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C
3914 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1425 Points ∼4% -64%
LG X Screen
1436 Points ∼4% -63%
Huawei P9 Lite
3768 Points ∼12% -4%
Honor 5X
3047 Points ∼9% -22%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C
906 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
473 Points ∼10% -48%
LG X Screen
473 Points ∼10% -48%
Huawei P9 Lite
883 Points ∼19% -3%
Honor 5X
698 Points ∼15% -23%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5C
1440 Points ∼48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5C
303 Points ∼7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor 5C
367 Points ∼10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5C
1418 Points ∼56%
Huawei P9 Lite
1370 Points ∼54% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5C
317 Points ∼6%
Huawei P9 Lite
305 Points ∼6% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 5C
383 Points ∼10%
Huawei P9 Lite
369 Points ∼10% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5C
1418 Points ∼55%
OnePlus X
1117 Points ∼43% -21%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
709 Points ∼27% -50%
LG X Screen
716 Points ∼28% -50%
Huawei P9 Lite
1373 Points ∼53% -3%
Honor 5X
1089 Points ∼42% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5C
480 Points ∼6%
OnePlus X
643 Points ∼8% +34%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
42 Points ∼1% -91%
LG X Screen
42 Points ∼1% -91%
Huawei P9 Lite
473 Points ∼6% -1%
Honor 5X
103 Points ∼1% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 5C
563 Points ∼12%
OnePlus X
710 Points ∼15% +26%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
53 Points ∼1% -91%
LG X Screen
53 Points ∼1% -91%
Huawei P9 Lite
554 Points ∼11% -2%
Honor 5X
129 Points ∼3% -77%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5C
13588 Points ∼20%
OnePlus X
17156 Points ∼25% +26%
HTC Desire 530
6583 Points ∼10% -52%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9022 Points ∼13% -34%
LG X Screen
9033 Points ∼13% -34%
Huawei P9 Lite
13676 Points ∼20% +1%
Honor 5X
8174 Points ∼12% -40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C
11319 Points ∼2%
OnePlus X
14541 Points ∼3% +28%
HTC Desire 530
3871 Points ∼1% -66%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3838 Points ∼1% -66%
LG X Screen
3791 Points ∼1% -67%
Huawei P9 Lite
11318 Points ∼2% 0%
Honor 5X
7764 Points ∼2% -31%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C
11755 Points ∼6%
OnePlus X
15051 Points ∼8% +28%
HTC Desire 530
4261 Points ∼2% -64%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4400 Points ∼2% -63%
LG X Screen
4352 Points ∼2% -63%
Huawei P9 Lite
11769 Points ∼6% 0%
Honor 5X
7852 Points ∼4% -33%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 5C
19 fps ∼1%
OnePlus X
21 fps ∼2% +11%
HTC Desire 530
4.8 fps ∼0% -75%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
5.2 fps ∼0% -73%
LG X Screen
5.1 fps ∼0% -73%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps ∼1% 0%
Honor 5X
14 fps ∼1% -26%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 5C
20 fps ∼4%
OnePlus X
23 fps ∼5% +15%
HTC Desire 530 (1184x720)
8.9 fps ∼2% -55%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9.7 fps ∼2% -51%
LG X Screen
9.6 fps ∼2% -52%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps ∼4% -5%
Honor 5X
14 fps ∼3% -30%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 5C
7.9 fps ∼1%
OnePlus X
8.6 fps ∼2% +9%
HTC Desire 530
1.7 fps ∼0% -78%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1.8 fps ∼0% -77%
LG X Screen
1.8 fps ∼0% -77%
Huawei P9 Lite
7.8 fps ∼1% -1%
Honor 5X
5.4 fps ∼1% -32%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 5C
8.4 fps ∼4%
OnePlus X
10 fps ∼4% +19%
HTC Desire 530 (1184x720)
4 fps ∼2% -52%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3.8 fps ∼2% -55%
LG X Screen
4 fps ∼2% -52%
Huawei P9 Lite
8.4 fps ∼4% 0%
Honor 5X
5.9 fps ∼3% -30%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5C
4.5 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.5 fps ∼1% 0%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5C
4.9 fps ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.9 fps ∼3% 0%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 5C
5120 Points ∼63%
OnePlus X
4450 Points ∼55% -13%
HTC Desire 530
2922 Points ∼36% -43%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4126 Points ∼51% -19%
LG X Screen
4031 Points ∼50% -21%
Huawei P9 Lite
5339 Points ∼66% +4%
Honor 5X
3794 Points ∼47% -26%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Honor 5C
707 Points ∼46%
OnePlus X
843 Points ∼55% +19%
HTC Desire 530
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
551 Points ∼36% -22%
LG X Screen
491 Points ∼32% -31%
Huawei P9 Lite
765 Points ∼50% +8%
Honor 5X
9 Points ∼1% -99%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5C
814 Points ∼9%
OnePlus X
1975 Points ∼23% +143%
HTC Desire 530
231 Points ∼3% -72%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
312 Points ∼4% -62%
LG X Screen
302 Points ∼4% -63%
Huawei P9 Lite
818 Points ∼10% 0%
Honor 5X
763 Points ∼9% -6%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 5C
1504 Points ∼39%
OnePlus X
662 Points ∼17% -56%
HTC Desire 530
300 Points ∼8% -80%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
643 Points ∼17% -57%
LG X Screen
491 Points ∼13% -67%
Huawei P9 Lite
1346 Points ∼35% -11%
Honor 5X
787 Points ∼20% -48%
System (sort by value)
Honor 5C
2600 Points ∼40%
OnePlus X
2225 Points ∼34% -14%
HTC Desire 530
742 Points ∼11% -71%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1060 Points ∼16% -59%
LG X Screen
1011 Points ∼15% -61%
Huawei P9 Lite
2438 Points ∼37% -6%
Honor 5X
1378 Points ∼21% -47%
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 5C
1225 Points ∼37%
OnePlus X
1252 Points ∼38% +2%
HTC Desire 530
149 Points ∼5% -88%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
585 Points ∼18% -52%
LG X Screen
521 Points ∼16% -57%
Huawei P9 Lite
1197 Points ∼36% -2%
Honor 5X
297 Points ∼9% -76%

Legend

 
Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 530 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG X Screen Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
9111.2 ms * ∼15%
OnePlus X (Chrome 46)
7264.1 ms * ∼12% +20%
HTC Desire 530 (Chrome 50)
17470.6 ms * ∼29% -92%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Chrome 50)
13046 ms * ∼22% -43%
LG X Screen (Chrome 51)
12879.8 ms * ∼22% -41%
Honor 5X (Chrome 48)
12510 ms * ∼21% -37%
Huawei P9 Lite (Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
9396.5 ms * ∼16% -3%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
4188 Points ∼8%
OnePlus X (Chrome 46)
4810 Points ∼10% +15%
HTC Desire 530 (Chrome 50)
1796 Points ∼4% -57%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Chrome 50)
2730 Points ∼6% -35%
LG X Screen (Chrome 51)
2650 Points ∼5% -37%
Honor 5X (Chrome 48)
3595 Points ∼7% -14%
Huawei P9 Lite (Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
4756 Points ∼10% +14%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
73 Points ∼13%
OnePlus X (Chrome 46)
85 Points ∼15% +16%
HTC Desire 530 (Chrome 50)
34 Points ∼6% -53%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
47 Points ∼8% -36%
Honor 5X (Chrome 48)
65 Points ∼11% -11%
Huawei P9 Lite
67 Points ∼12% -8%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
27.934 Points ∼9%
OnePlus X (Chrome 46)
28 Points ∼9% 0%
HTC Desire 530 (Chrome 50)
12.1 Points ∼4% -57%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Chrome 50)
16.8 Points ∼5% -40%
LG X Screen (Chrome 51)
15.666 Points ∼5% -44%
Honor 5X (Chrome 48)
21.92 Points ∼7% -22%
Huawei P9 Lite (Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
29.03 Points ∼9% +4%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Honor 5C (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
24.21 MB/s ∼28%
HTC Desire 530 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
18.22 MB/s ∼21% -25%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
46.61 MB/s ∼53% +93%
LG X Screen (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
46.95 MB/s ∼54% +94%
Huawei P9 Lite (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
25.1 MB/s ∼29% +4%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Honor 5C (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
51.93 MB/s ∼54%
HTC Desire 530 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
35.56 MB/s ∼37% -32%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
79.83 MB/s ∼83% +54%
LG X Screen (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
75.3 MB/s ∼78% +45%
Huawei P9 Lite (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
60.81 MB/s ∼63% +17%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Honor 5C
15.7 MB/s ∼10%
OnePlus X
14.22 MB/s ∼9% -9%
HTC Desire 530
8.96 MB/s ∼6% -43%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
11.6 MB/s ∼8% -26%
LG X Screen
8 MB/s ∼5% -49%
Honor 5X
10 MB/s ∼7% -36%
Huawei P9 Lite
15.35 MB/s ∼10% -2%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Honor 5C
61.7 MB/s ∼37%
OnePlus X
16.31 MB/s ∼10% -74%
HTC Desire 530
11.82 MB/s ∼7% -81%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
21 MB/s ∼12% -66%
LG X Screen
10 MB/s ∼6% -84%
Honor 5X
17 MB/s ∼10% -72%
Huawei P9 Lite
38.22 MB/s ∼23% -38%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Honor 5C
75.5 MB/s ∼40%
OnePlus X
49.31 MB/s ∼26% -35%
HTC Desire 530
55.76 MB/s ∼29% -26%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
72 MB/s ∼38% -5%
LG X Screen
72 MB/s ∼38% -5%
Honor 5X
78 MB/s ∼41% +3%
Huawei P9 Lite
46.24 MB/s ∼24% -39%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Honor 5C
263 MB/s ∼36%
OnePlus X
235.51 MB/s ∼32% -10%
HTC Desire 530
126.99 MB/s ∼17% -52%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
147 MB/s ∼20% -44%
LG X Screen
131 MB/s ∼18% -50%
Honor 5X
144 MB/s ∼20% -45%
Huawei P9 Lite
283.55 MB/s ∼38% +8%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InställningarVärde
 high26 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 InställningarVärde
 high30 fps
Hög belastning
 38.4 °C38.1 °C40.9 °C 
 38.4 °C38.1 °C42.2 °C 
 37.3 °C37.6 °C40.2 °C 
Max: 42.2 °C
Medel: 39 °C
33.8 °C34.6 °C35.9 °C
34.4 °C35.2 °C35.6 °C
34.4 °C35.1 °C35.5 °C
Max: 35.9 °C
Medel: 34.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  36.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.14 / 0.27 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.89 / 2.07 / 2.15 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.46 / 5.18 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
HTC Desire 530
2200 mAh
OnePlus X
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
Honor 5X
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-37%
37%
32%
0%
-15%
Idle Minimum *
0.89
1.58
-78%
0.6
33%
0.61
31%
0.73
18%
0.87
2%
Idle Average *
2.07
2.59
-25%
0.91
56%
1.41
32%
2.09
-1%
2.08
-0%
Idle Maximum *
2.15
2.66
-24%
1.12
48%
1.51
30%
2.11
2%
2.22
-3%
Load Average *
3.46
5.22
-51%
3.04
12%
2.56
26%
4.15
-20%
5.26
-52%
Load Maximum *
5.18
5.67
-9%
3.2
38%
3.1
40%
5.05
3%
6.34
-22%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
16tim 37min
Surfa med WLAN v1.3
9tim 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10tim 02min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 36min
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
LG X Screen
2300 mAh
HTC Desire 530
2200 mAh
OnePlus X
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Honor 5X
3000 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
2%
5%
23%
59%
2%
28%
Reader / Idle
997
976
-2%
1117
12%
968
-3%
1599
60%
1053
6%
1404
41%
Load
156
177
13%
250
60%
339
117%
402
158%
144
-8%
272
74%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
584
553
-5%
425
-27%
549
-6%
643
10%
643
10%
604
3%
H.264
602
457
-24%
514
-15%
658
9%
602
0%
568
-6%

För

+ superb Full HD-panel
+ pris/prestanda
+ bra bilder i ljusa miljöer
+ modern Android
+ NFC
+ hög prestanda
+ bra röstkvalitet
+ användbar batteritid
+ dual-SIM

Emot

- fast batteri
- antingen extra-SIM eller microSD
- ej USB OTG
- ej App2SD
- begränsade frekvensband
- dålig kamera i mörka omgivningar
- relativt tung
In review: Honor 5C. Review sample courtesy of Honor Germany.
In review: Honor 5C. Review sample courtesy of Honor Germany.

Läs en längre version av testet på engelska här.

OnePlus X var en smärre sensation i mellanklassen när den lanserades. Detsamma gäller Honor 5C; högkvalitativa komponenter gömmer sig bakom i övrigt måttligt intressanta specifikationer, vilket innebär att testenheten kan utmana betydligt dyrare smartphones.

  • Exempel 1 - kameran: Bilderna blir skarpa men inte alltför skarpa, samtidigt som färgåtergivningen är bra. Den främre kameran tar också hyfsade selfies. Gimmicks som 4K-inspelning finns inte med och kameran är inte lika bra i svagt ljus, men presterar ändå bra med tanke på priset.
  • Exempel 2 - skärmen: Full HD, hög ljusstyrka, IPS – så mycket mer kan man inte begära när prislappen är fyrsiffrig och börjar på siffran 1. Svärtan kunde varit lägre och en blåaktig färgton är synlig, men det är också acceptabelt i prisklassen. 

Bra allmänprestanda, ett stort batteri och bra röstkvalitet är andra fördelar. Honor 5C är definitivt en värdig och prisvärd utmanare av OnePlus X. Vårt testexemplar överträffar med bred marginal vad man kan förvänta sig i prisklassen.

Användare som ofta använder sin mobil på andra kontinenter kan bli besvikna på frekvensbanden, och det finns heller ingen riktigt snabb Wi-Fi-modul. Dessutom kan batteriet inte tas bort. Dual-SIM är bra att ha, men att man måste välja mellan ett extra SIM eller micro-SD-kort är olyckligt.

Å andra sidan är pris/prestanda-förhållandet suveränt. Luren får en solklar rekommendation.

Honor 5C - 07/06/2016 v5.1
Florian Wimmer

Design
86%
Tangentbord
60 / 75 → 80%
Mus
93%
Anslutningar
39 / 60 → 66%
Vikt
92%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
84%
Spelprestanda
25 / 63 → 40%
Programprestanda
48 / 70 → 69%
Temperatur
85%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
73%
Medel
72%
84%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

> Bärbara datorer/Laptops: Tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Honor 5C (smartphone) (sammanfattning)
Florian Wimmer, 2016-08-13 (Update: 2016-08-15)