Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: HP Elite Dragonfly - Lättare än 1 kg med det mindre batteriet (Sammanfattning)
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90.3 % | 04/2020 | HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.1 kg | 16.1 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.4 % | 01/2020 | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.4 % | 06/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 15.95 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.3 % | 10/2019 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 13 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 411 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1868:1 (Svärta: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA AUO5E2D, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx AU Optronics AUO5E2D, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 LP133WF7-SPA1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.40 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -4% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69 | 69.6 1% | 65.2 -6% | 69.9 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 98.9 -1% | 97 -2% | 99.2 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.9 | 71.5 1% | 67.3 -5% | 71.5 1% |
| Response Times | -5% | 6% | 18% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 60.8 ? | 60.8 ? -0% | 59.2 ? 3% | 47.6 ? 22% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 33.8 ? | 36.8 ? -9% | 30.8 ? 9% | 29.2 ? 14% |
| PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | |||
| Screen | -44% | -56% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 411 | 447.4 9% | 319 -22% | 549.8 34% |
| Brightness | 388 | 420 8% | 306 -21% | 520 34% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 85 -2% | 90 3% | 86 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.31 -41% | 0.15 32% | 0.39 -77% |
| Contrast | 1868 | 1443 -23% | 2127 14% | 1410 -25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 4.23 -135% | 6.1 -239% | 2.12 -18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.1 | 9.34 -128% | 9.7 -137% | 3.66 11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 1.32 -32% | 1 -0% | 1.37 -37% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 6.1 -144% | 8.6 -244% | 2.6 -4% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.11 104% | 2.62 84% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 6448 101% | 6136 106% | 6613 98% | 6884 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 64.7 | 64.8 0% | 61.9 -4% | 65.4 1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.3 | 98.9 0% | 96.8 -3% | 99.7 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
-31% | -18% /
-39% | 4% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 60.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3563 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4647 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4548 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3636 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1956 poäng | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 57515 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1091 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 417 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 55.6 | 32.3 | 27.7 | 9.5 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 17.1 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 66.4 | 40.2 | 18.7 | 16.9 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 11.7 | 9.84 | 9.25 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 29.5 / 30 / 30.3 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 31.6 / 31.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.5 dB(A) | ||
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | -2% | -2% | |
| off / environment * | 29.5 | 28.5 3% | 29.2 1% | 28.1 5% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.5 | 28.5 3% | 29.2 1% | 28.1 5% |
| Idle Average * | 30 | 28.5 5% | 29.2 3% | 28.1 6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.3 | 28.5 6% | 29.2 4% | 28.1 7% |
| Load Average * | 31.6 | 28.5 10% | 35 -11% | 31.7 -0% |
| Load Maximum * | 31.6 | 35.3 -12% | 35 -11% | 43.4 -37% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.3 | 43.4 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-2.3 °C / -4.1 F).
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.36 / 0.48 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 3.5 / 5.1 / 8.1 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
35.6 / 44.7 Watt |
   
| |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.40 | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -9% | -20% | 1% | -11% | -45% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 3.9 -11% | 3.46 1% | 2.6 26% | 3.81 ? -9% | 5.44 ? -55% |
| Idle Average * | 5.1 | 6.3 -24% | 5.88 -15% | 5.3 -4% | 6.94 ? -36% | 8.27 ? -62% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.1 | 6.8 16% | 9.12 -13% | 7 14% | 8.75 ? -8% | 10.8 ? -33% |
| Load Average * | 35.6 | 32.6 8% | 45.6 -28% | 43.1 -21% | 35 ? 2% | 46.7 ? -31% |
| Load Maximum * | 44.7 | 59 -32% | 65.9 -47% | 49 -10% | 47.5 ? -6% | 65.4 ? -46% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 25.6 | 43.1 |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 56.2 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 51 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -3% | -27% | -11% | -9% | |
| H.264 | 717 | 600 -16% | 769 ? 7% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 605 | 594 -2% | 492 -19% | 537 -11% | 564 ? -7% |
| Load | 166 | 160 -4% | 91 -45% | 121.7 ? -27% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2223 | 1112 ? |
För
Emot
Omdöme – Elite Dragonfly är en riktigt bra omvandlingsbar för företaget
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Är Elite Dragonfly en riktig EliteBook? Efter vår utförliga recension kan vi besvara den frågan med ett säkert "Ja". Du får ett robust chassi av hög kvalitet, utförliga säkerhetsfunktioner samt de vanliga servicemöjligheterna som inkluderar långvarig tillgång till reservdelar. HP:s lyxiga omvandlingsbara kan också övertyga på många andra sätt, med start i utmärkta inmatningsenheter, snabba kommunikationsmoduler inklusive LTE och lång batteritid. Men det sistnämnda gäller bara modellen med det större batteriet, vilket ökar datorns vikt till över 1 kg. Vi tycker dock ändå det är en bra kompromiss.
Vi kan heller inte kritisera portutbudet, för den har en vanlig USB Typ A-port samt en HDMI-port i full storlek utöver de tunna USB C-anslutningarna. Det hade dock gått att optimera portsituationen: Upplägget hade varit bättre med USB-C längre bak och gärna på båda sidor och vi hade gärna sett en SD-kortläsare, åtminstone för microSD-kort.
HP Elite Dragonfly är en riktigt bra omvandlingsbar för företaget. Den har definitivt några brister, men det rör sig om mindre saker. Vi kan därför rekommendera Elite Dragonfly om du letar efter just en företagsinriktad omvandlingsbar.
Det finns andra brister, vilket inkluderar processorns väldigt konservativa TDP-konfiguration. Prestandan minskar efter några sekunder, men räcker ändå till helt och hållet för vanliga kontorsuppgifter. Men det finns bättre enheter om du behöver hög CPU-prestanda. Fläkten är i gengäld väldigt tyst även om vi tycker den reagerar lite för snabbt på belastning.
Vi rekommenderar i huvudsak den konfiguration vi testat som är utrustad med en Core i5-processor, en vanlig tryckkänslig 1080p-skärm och det större batteriet. Det går att minska vikten med det mindre batteriet, men vi föredrar längre batteritid på en såpass mobil enhet. Av samma anledning är 4K-skärmen som finns som tillval ett problem eftersom den drar mer ström. Vi var dessutom väldigt nöjda med den vanliga tryckkänsliga 1080p-skärmen. De enda bristerna med den är långsamma responstider (som du vänjer dig vid) och den blanka ytan.
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA
-
04/03/2020 v7
Andreas Osthoff
Pricecompare
