Notebookcheck

Test: Eve V (m3, i5, i7) Omvandlingsbar (Sammanfattning)

J. Simon Leitner, Klaus A. Hinum (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 11/23/2017

Från massan till folket. Det har gått ungefär ett år sedan Eve V-projektet gjorde vågor på gräsrotsfinansieringsplattformen Indiegogo. Det finansiella målet nåddes på rekordtid och projektet fick tillslut mer än 1800% av sitt mål. Nu är det dags att förbereda enheterna för leverans till de som stött projektet samt göra dom tillgängliga för intresserade köpare. Vi har redan testat enheten och jämför alla tre CPU-modellerna tillgängliga för Eve V.

Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Processor
Intel Core i5-7Y54
Grafikkort
Intel HD Graphics 615 - 1024 MB, Kärna: 400 MHz, Minne: 931 MHz, 22.20.16.4815
Minne
8192 MB 
, LPDDR3
Skärm
12.3 tum , 2880x1920 pixlar 281 PPI, Tryckkänslig, native pen support, Sharp LQ123Z1JX3X, IPS LED, IGZO, glansig: ja, detachable screen
Moderkort
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Hårddisk
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, 256 GB 
Ljudkort
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Anslutningar
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: Hörlurar, Kortläsare: Micro SDXC, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Hall, gravitation, och ljussensor, gyroskop, accelerometer
Nätverk
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.9 x 296 x 205
Batteri
48 Wh
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: Främre och bakre webkamera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: 4 högtalare, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Inmatningspenna, tangentbordsöverdrag, 12 Månader Garanti, fanless
Released
11/20/2017
Vikt
1.36 kg, Strömförsörjning: 220 g
Pris
1199 Kr

 

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
130.7 MB/s ∼100% +87%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼67% +26%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.8 MB/s ∼61% +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72.62 MB/s ∼56% +4%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
(Toshiba Exceria microSDHC 32GB UHS-I)
69.8 MB/s ∼53%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
24.5 MB/s ∼19% -65%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23 MB/s ∼18% -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194 MB/s ∼100% +128%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
93.77 MB/s ∼48% +10%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89.6 MB/s ∼46% +5%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
87.4 MB/s ∼45% +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
(Toshiba Exceria microSDHC 32GB UHS-I)
85.2 MB/s ∼44%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.6 MB/s ∼14% -69%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25.2 MB/s ∼13% -70%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
606 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
586 MBit/s ∼97% 0%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
584 MBit/s ∼96%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
577 MBit/s ∼95% -1%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
569 MBit/s ∼94% -3%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
520 MBit/s ∼86% -11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
668 MBit/s ∼100% +30%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
644 MBit/s ∼96% +26%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
618 MBit/s ∼93% +21%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
512 MBit/s ∼77%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
440 MBit/s ∼66% -14%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
246 MBit/s ∼37% -52%
420
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 471 cd/m² Medel: 432.7 cd/m² Minimum: 9.2 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 471 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1472:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | - Ø
92.99% sRGB (Argyll) 70% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.2
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Sharp LQ123Z1JX3X, , 2880x1920, 12.3
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
Samsung SDCA029, , 2160x1440, 12
Huawei MateBook X
Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 2160x1440, 13.3
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Samsung SDC4A49, , 2716x1824, 12.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
LSN120QL01L01, , 2160 x 1440, 12
Response Times
687%
19%
31%
53%
-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
49.1 (23.1, 26)
42 (20, 22)
14%
4 (2, 2)
92%
33 (15, 18)
33%
45.6 (23.6, 22)
7%
28.4 (15.2, 13.2)
42%
Response Time Black / White *
33.6 (18.1, 15.5)
29 (18, 11)
14%
20 (18, 2)
40%
24 (12, 12)
29%
21.6 (9.2, 12.4)
36%
22.8 (13.6, 9.2)
32%
PWM Frequency
985 (25)
21000
2032%
250 (100)
-75%
2119 (50)
115%
221.2 (49)
-78%
Screen
-4%
94%
-3%
-8%
-36%
Brightness
433
401
-7%
378
-13%
395
-9%
446
3%
344
-21%
Brightness Distribution
85
88
4%
91
7%
88
4%
88
4%
78
-8%
Black Level *
0.32
0.29
9%
0.03
91%
0.45
-41%
0.41
-28%
0.39
-22%
Contrast
1472
1438
-2%
12533
751%
907
-38%
1080
-27%
995
-32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.2
3.63
-65%
4.1
-86%
1.55
30%
2.6
-18%
4.6
-109%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.4
2.18
36%
3.64
-7%
1.91
44%
3
12%
6.1
-79%
Gamma
2.2 109%
3.09 78%
2.58 93%
2.34 103%
2.38 101%
2.07 116%
CCT
6270 104%
6767 96%
7113 91%
6491 100%
6780 96%
7104 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
70
63
-10%
74
6%
61
-13%
62.6
-11%
59
-16%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92.99
99
6%
93
0%
96
3%
98
5%
91
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
342% / 185%
57% / 73%
14% / 4%
23% / 9%
-19% / -27%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.1 ms rise
↘ 15.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
49.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.1 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 985 Hz25 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 985 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 985 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8568 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Eve V i5-7Y54 (7W)

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Surface Pro 2017 i5-7300U

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF
Intel Core i5-8250U
144 Points ∼100% +29%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel Core i5-7300U
141 Points ∼98% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
Intel Core i5-7200U
127 Points ∼88% +13%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel Core i5-7200U
127 Points ∼88% +13%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7
Intel Core i7-7Y75
121 Points ∼84% +8%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Core i5-7200U
116 Points ∼81% +4%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
Intel Core i5-5350U
116 Points ∼81% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
115 Points ∼80% +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel Core i5-7Y54
112 Points ∼78%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
105 Points ∼73% -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF
Intel Core i5-8250U
534 Points ∼100% +142%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel Core i5-7300U
334 Points ∼63% +51%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel Core i5-7200U
322 Points ∼60% +46%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel Core i5-7200U
322 Points ∼60% +46%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
Intel Core i5-7200U
321 Points ∼60% +45%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
Intel Core i5-5350U
277 Points ∼52% +25%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
250 (min: 227.93) Points ∼47% +13%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7
Intel Core i7-7Y75
236 (min: 227.93) Points ∼44% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
234 Points ∼44% +6%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel Core i5-7Y54
221 Points ∼41%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
28.54 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
221 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
112 Points
Hjälp

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Eve V m3-7Y30

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Eve V i7-7Y75

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Eve V i5-7Y54 (12W)

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3999 Points ∼100% +48%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
3538 Points ∼88% +31%
Huawei MateBook X
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, LITEON CB1-SD256
3507 Points ∼88% +29%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3289 Points ∼82% +21%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3197 Points ∼80% +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3092 Points ∼77% +14%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
2936 Points ∼73% +8%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7
HD Graphics 615, 7Y75, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
2786 Points ∼70% +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
2709 Points ∼68%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW128G7
2685 Points ∼67% -1%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2709 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3664 poäng
Hjälp
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW128G7
Eve-Tech Eve V i7
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CrystalDiskMark 5.2
-23%
23%
25%
91%
Write 4K
143.6
121.84
-15%
152
6%
124
-14%
143
0%
Read 4K
26.6
29.53
11%
21
-21%
42
58%
53.38
101%
Write Seq
588.3
275.8
-53%
559
-5%
831
41%
1264
115%
Read Seq
1127
688.43
-39%
1066
-5%
805
-29%
1770
57%
Write 4K Q32T1
170.2
252.28
48%
444
161%
300
76%
471
177%
Read 4K Q32T1
283.1
140.31
-50%
457
61%
322
14%
418.1
48%
Write Seq Q32T1
573.5
359.5
-37%
559
-3%
846
48%
1270
121%
Read Seq Q32T1
1557
769.8
-51%
1404
-10%
1656
6%
3196
105%
AS SSD
-36%
13%
-12733%
123%
Access Time Write *
0.03
0.047
-57%
0.028
7%
23
-76567%
0.027
10%
Access Time Read *
0.08
0.106
-33%
0.058
27%
0.071
11%
0.041
49%
4K-64 Write
508
264.37
-48%
471
-7%
75
-85%
657.04
29%
4K-64 Read
279
137.19
-51%
500
79%
1221.8
338%
2279.57
717%
4K Write
115
105.61
-8%
130.1
13%
132.2
15%
4K Read
32.3
32.42
0%
33.2
3%
45.24
40%
Seq Write
572
346.7
-39%
539
-6%
156.7
-73%
897.45
57%
Seq Read
1346
704.7
-48%
1208
-10%
1036.8
-23%
2197.21
63%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-30% / -29%
18% / 18%
-6354% / -5443%
107% / 107%

* ... smaller is better

Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
CDM 5 Read Seq Q32T1: 1557 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq Q32T1: 573.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read 4K Q32T1: 283.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Write 4K Q32T1: 170.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1127 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 588.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read 4K: 26.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Write 4K: 143.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1709 Points ∼100% +43%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1533 Points ∼90% +28%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1528 Points ∼89% +28%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1510 Points ∼88% +26%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
1383.5 (min: 1376) Points ∼81% +16%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-7Y75
1234 (min: 1228) Points ∼72% +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
1195 (min: 1195) Points ∼70%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
1161 Points ∼68% -3%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
1150 Points ∼100% +35%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
971 Points ∼84% +14%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
948 Points ∼82% +11%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
933 Points ∼81% +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
889 Points ∼77% +4%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
875 Points ∼76% +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-7Y75
873 Points ∼76% +2%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
853 Points ∼74%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
728 Points ∼63% -15%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U
9678 Points ∼100% +52%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
7776 Points ∼80% +22%
Huawei MateBook X
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
7542 Points ∼78% +19%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
7334 Points ∼76% +15%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
7265 Points ∼75% +14%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
7138 (min: 7124) Points ∼74% +12%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-7Y75
6387 (min: 6307) Points ∼66% 0%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
6360 Points ∼66%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
6164 Points ∼64% -3%
3DMark 11 Performance
1319 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4836 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
762 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
292 poäng
Hjälp
Overwatch
1366x768 Medium (Render Scale 100 %) AA:FX AF:2x
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
98 fps ∼100% +347%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
41 (min: 29) fps ∼42% +87%
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
30.7 fps ∼31% +40%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006
25 fps ∼26% +14%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
24.1 (min: 16) fps ∼25% +10%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
21.9 fps ∼22%
1280x720 Low (Render Scale 100 %) AA:FX AF:1x
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
143.4 fps ∼100% +409%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
63.3 (min: 46) fps ∼44% +124%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
53.6 (min: 39) fps ∼37% +90%
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
49.6 fps ∼35% +76%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006
33.3 fps ∼23% +18%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
28.2 fps ∼20%
FIFA 18
1366x768 Medium Preset
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
161.4 fps ∼100%
1280x720 Low Preset
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
135.6 fps ∼100% +200%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
69.5 (min: 59) fps ∼51% +54%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
45.2 fps ∼33%
låg med. hög ultra
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 57.431.8515.714.1fps
Overwatch (2016) 28.221.9fps
FIFA 18 (2017) 45.2fps
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
141 (min: 123) fps ∼100% +900%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
68.9 fps ∼49% +389%
Razer Core V2 GTX 1080 + Eve V m3
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 7Y30
58.6 (min: 50.3) fps ∼42% +316%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
47.7 fps ∼34% +238%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
23 (min: 21) fps ∼16% +63%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
19.8 (min: 17) fps ∼14% +40%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
14.1 (min: 12.8) fps ∼10%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
142 (min: 121) fps ∼100% +804%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
78.5 fps ∼55% +400%
Razer Core V2 GTX 1080 + Eve V m3
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 7Y30
62.3 (min: 53.4) fps ∼44% +297%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
53.1 fps ∼37% +238%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
29.5 (min: 26) fps ∼21% +88%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
27.6 (min: 25) fps ∼19% +76%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
15.7 (min: 14.6) fps ∼11%
1366x768 med (1/3)
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
149 (min: 128) fps ∼100% +368%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
97 fps ∼65% +205%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
89.8 fps ∼60% +182%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
63.7 (min: 55) fps ∼43% +100%
Razer Core V2 GTX 1080 + Eve V m3
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 7Y30
58 (min: 48.5) fps ∼39% +82%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
55 (min: 40) fps ∼37% +73%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
31.85 (min: 27.6) fps ∼21%
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000
177 (min: 154) fps ∼100% +208%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH
125.6 fps ∼71% +119%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
105.9 fps ∼60% +84%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
92 (min: 75) fps ∼52% +60%
Razer Core V2 GTX 1080 + Eve V m3
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 7Y30
79.3 (min: 64.1) fps ∼45% +38%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
68 (min: 58) fps ∼38% +18%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
57.4 (min: 50.3) fps ∼32%
Hög belastning
 40.4 °C42.4 °C38.3 °C 
 35.3 °C34.7 °C34.6 °C 
 34.2 °C36.8 °C37.9 °C 
Max: 42.4 °C
Medel: 37.2 °C
39.6 °C42.1 °C41.9 °C
38.1 °C39.4 °C39.7 °C
34.2 °C34.9 °C34.2 °C
Max: 42.1 °C
Medel: 38.2 °C
Rumstemperatur 21.5 °C | Raytek Raynger ST
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.236.22532.434313332.54037.235.75033.637.5633330.78031.629.610032.43212528.539.816026.433.220025.840.825024.946.831523.754.54002360.650021.760.763021.163.380020.369.6100019.869.5125019.466.3160019.165.8200018.872.6250018.769.4315018.469.6400018.368.2500018.468.2630018.464.3800018.458.81000018.351.51250018.347.81600018.451SPL31.879.9N1.744.2median 19.4Eve-Tech Eve V i5median 60.7Delta2.610.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 20%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.6 / 1.9 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 4.2 / 7.2 / 7.8 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 20.4 / 34.6 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS LED, 2880x1920, 12.3
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
7Y30, HD Graphics 615, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW128G7, IPS, 2880x1920, 12.3
Eve-Tech Eve V i7
7Y75, HD Graphics 615, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 2880x1920, 12.3
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, Super AMOLED, 2160x1440, 12
Huawei MateBook X
7200U, HD Graphics 620, LITEON CB1-SD256, , 2160x1440, 13.3
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2716x1824, 12.3
Power Consumption
-0%
-4%
-1%
-17%
-42%
-35%
Idle Minimum *
4.2
4.3
-2%
4.5
-7%
3.6
14%
3.9
7%
4.6
-10%
4.1
2%
Idle Average *
7.2
7.3
-1%
7.6
-6%
8.1
-13%
9
-25%
11
-53%
9.2
-28%
Idle Maximum *
7.8
7.8
-0%
8.1
-4%
8.7
-12%
11.9
-53%
12
-54%
11.1
-42%
Load Average *
20.4
21.1
-3%
22
-8%
25.5
-25%
27.3
-34%
39.5
-94%
33.8
-66%
Load Maximum *
34.6
33.2
4%
33.1
4%
23.5
32%
27.9
19%
34.6
-0%
49.2
-42%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
16tim 28min
Surfa med WLAN v1.3
8tim 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10tim 34min
Eve-Tech Eve V i5
7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 48 Wh
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
7Y30, HD Graphics 615, 48 Wh
Eve-Tech Eve V i7
7Y75, HD Graphics 615, 48 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
7300U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 39 Wh
Huawei MateBook X
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 47 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 37 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 45 Wh
Battery Runtime
-4%
-14%
25%
-16%
-42%
-28%
-25%
-5%
Reader / Idle
988
1054
7%
1031
4%
512
-48%
833
-16%
662
-33%
H.264
634
607
-4%
563
-11%
409
-35%
377
-41%
614
-3%
WiFi v1.3
523
435
-17%
744
42%
337
-36%
378
-28%
441
-16%
489
-7%
Load
168
162
138
134
112
Witcher 3 ultra
115

För

+ högkvalitativt helgjutet hölje, robust konstruktion
+ bekväm känsla på surfplatta och tangentbord
+ Thunderbolt 3 och Typ-C Gen. 1 portar
+ bra WiFi-prestanda
+ komplett paket med tangentbordsdocka och penna som ingår i priset
+ tangentbordet också lämpligt för längre skrivande
+ skärm med väldigt bra ljusstyrka och kontrast
+ exakt färgreproduktion redan vid leverans
+ användning av eGPU är möjlig
+ tyst drift
+ måttlig uppvärmning
+ attraktivt pris

Emot

- jämförelsevis ganska tung
- den inkluderade Typ-C laddningskabeln vrider sig
- smuts-resistansen hos tangentbordet kan ifrågasättas
- prestandan för m3-versionen stämmer inte överens med våra förväntningar
- de extra fördelarna med en eGPU är kraftigt begränsade av CPU:n
- medioker ljudkvalitet på de inbyggda högtalarna
In Review: Eve V
In Review: Eve V

Och här är den, folkets nya omvandlingsbara Eve V! Här är en sammanfattning av vårt test:

I fråga om höljet visar sig Eve V vara en vinnare. Det helgjutna aluminium-höljet och Alcantara-tangentbordet har en känsla av hög kvalitet, visar inga svagheter i sin konstruktion och verkar väldigt robust. På nästan 1.4 kg är systemet egentligen inte lättare än aktuella Ultrabook-modeller. Men det är också den enda verkligt negativa aspekten av vår utvärdering. De bra anslutningsmöjligheterna är å andra sidan en positiv aspekt. Med två Typ-A USB 3.0 och två Typ-C anslutningar, där en är en full Thunderbolt 3-port, så är du väl utrustad för alla eventualiteter. Vi gillade också tangentbordet och det är fullt tillräckligt för längre skrivuppgifter. Vår erfarenhet med inmatningen från den inkluderade N-Trig pennan var tillfredställande och det är definitivt lovvärt att endast erbjuda paket med tangentbord och penna inkluderade så som Eve-Tech gör. På detta sätt kan man undvika att "överraska" användaren med dolda kostnader.

Skärmen erbjuder väldigt bra ljusstyrka och kontrast. Eve V kommer med en kalibrerad skärm direkt ur lådan och har relativt exakta färger. 3K-upplösningen ger hög bildskärpa, men kan leda till problem med specifika program på grund av den nödvändiga Windows-skalningen.

Eve V är en attraktiv enhet, men borde inte överskattas.

Sen till Eve Vs prestandareserver: För detta projekt valdes processorer från Intels Y-serie. Dessa är passivt kylda chip med en TDP på 4.5 watt. Även om i5-7300U i Surface Pro kan erbjuda mycket högre prestanda en kort stund så kommer den under långvarig belastning jämna ut sig med den i5-7Y54-modell vi provar här. Samtliga testade CPU-modeller (m3, i5, i7) visar nästan stabil prestanda under konstant belastning. Men det var underligt att m3-modellen som vi hade här klarade sig mycket bättre i många av våra tester än de mycket dyrare i5- och i7-modellerna. Eve V är en bra enhet för grundläggande kontorsarbete, särskilt med tanke på den långa batteritid den kan uppnå. För innehålls-skapare kommer enhetens CPU snart att bli en flaskhals för komplex mjukvara.

Eve V är tillgänglig från ca 7 900 SEK (799 Euro). Men utöver m3-CPU:n får du bara 128 GB lagringsutrymme, vilket kan vara för lite för många användare. Nästa steg är i5-modellen med 256 GB lagringsutrymme, som redan kostar ca 11 800 SEK (1199 Euro). Ett tillägg på ca 4 000 SEK (400 Euro) för en CPU som knappt visar några fördelar och 128 GB ytterligare lagringsutrymme är ganska mycket. Det fortsätter på detta sätt: i5, 16 GB RAM och 512 GB lagring kostar ca 15 200 SEK (1549 Euro), i7-modellerna börjar på ca 16 200 SEK (1649 Euro) och topp-modellen med i7, 16 GB RAM och 1 TB SSD (Samsung PM961) kostar maffiga 19 700 SEK (1999 Euro).

I jämförelse med konkurrensen såsom Surface Pro från Microsoft hittar Eve V en bra nivå i fråga om pris (Surface Pro i5-7300U, 256 GB SSD, 8 GB: ca 11 300 SEK (1149 Euro) + Type Cover ca 1 800 SEK (179 Euro) + Surface Pen ca 1 100 SEK (109 Euro)), särskilt med tanke på att tangentbord och penna är inkluderade i paketet. Men tittar man på prisskillnaderna mellan modellerna ser vi att pristilläggen för de andra modellerna som följer Microsofts stil är väl tilltagna, särskilt med tanke på att skillnaden mellan processorerna är minimal.

Eve V har redan skickats till de som gett stöd åt projektet och borde anlända snart. Andra intresserade köpare kan börja beställa online från 4:e December.

Eve-Tech Eve V i5 - 11/19/2017 v6
J. Simon Leitner, Klaus A. Hinum

Design
90 / 98 → 91%
Tangentbord
89%
Mus
86%
Anslutningar
63 / 80 → 79%
Vikt
71 / 78 → 83%
Batteri
91%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
55 / 68 → 81%
Programprestanda
71 / 87 → 82%
Temperatur
89%
Ljudnivå
97%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
58 / 85 → 69%
Medel
78%
86%
Convertible - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Eve V (m3, i5, i7) Omvandlingsbar (Sammanfattning)
J. Simon Leitner, Klaus A. Hinum, 2017-11-23 (Update: 2017-11-23)