Notebookcheck

Test: Dell Latitude 3590 - Kontorslaptop med stora brister

Sven Kloevekorn (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 07/04/2019

Verkligen inte nära, definitivt ingen hare. Dell har släppt en ny version ur sin 3000-serie riktad åt kontor och företag och den lägger till ytterligare problem till seriens redan kända svagheter. Den senaste versionen har inte bara problem med skärmen, som vi hade ogillat om den så suttit i en budgetlaptop på 4.000 kronor, utan den har också andra problem på den tekniska sidan. Utöver detta har den dock riktigt bra batteritid.

Dell Latitude 3590
Grafikkort
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Kärna: 300 - 1100 MHz, Delat minne, 23.20.16.4973
Minne
8192 MB 
, DDR4, 2400 MHz, enkel kanal, 1 av 2 platser upptagna
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, BOE0802 / NT15N41 / Dell: M9P74, TN LED, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ, 256 GB 
Ljudkort
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerat ljud in/ut, 3.5 mm, Kortläsare: SD/SDHC/SDXC, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 22 x 380 x 258
Batteri
56 Wh Litiumjon, 2 celler
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD (0.9 MP)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, främre delen av undersidan, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 12 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.07 kg, Strömförsörjning: 221 g
Pris
899 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Dell Latitude 3590
Dell Latitude 3590
Dell Latitude 3590
Dell Latitude 3590
Dell Latitude 3590
Dell Latitude 3590
Dell Latitude 3590
Dell Latitude 3590
Dell Latitude 3590
Dell Latitude 3590

Storleksjämförelse

380 mm 258 mm 22 mm 2.1 kg379 mm 258 mm 23 mm 2 kg369 mm 253 mm 19.9 mm 1.9 kg333.4 mm 228.9 mm 22.45 mm 1.7 kg
Vänster sida: ström, USB 3.1 typ C, HDMI 1.4, Ethernet (nedfällbar), USB 3.0, Hörlurar/Mikrofon
Vänster sida: ström, USB 3.1 typ C, HDMI 1.4, Ethernet (nedfällbar), USB 3.0, Hörlurar/Mikrofon
Höger sida: SD-kortläsare, USB 2.0, VGA, lås
Höger sida: SD-kortläsare, USB 2.0, VGA, lås
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 14 5495
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
116.6 MB/s ∼100% +435%
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.9 MB/s ∼63% +239%
Average of class Office
  (10.2 - 191, n=267)
60.7 MB/s ∼52% +178%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.9 MB/s ∼20% +10%
Dell Latitude 3590
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
21.8 MB/s ∼19%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 14 5495
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
203.2 MB/s ∼100% +703%
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.8 MB/s ∼42% +239%
Average of class Office
  (9.5 - 255, n=242)
77 MB/s ∼38% +204%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.6 MB/s ∼13% +5%
Dell Latitude 3590
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25.3 MB/s ∼12%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
559 MBit/s ∼100% +91%
Average of class Office
  (5 - 688, n=210)
462 MBit/s ∼83% +58%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
452 (min: 329, max: 553) MBit/s ∼81% +55%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
295 (min: 186, max: 388) MBit/s ∼53% +1%
Dell Latitude 3590
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
292 (min: 177, max: 317) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
684 MBit/s ∼100% +18%
Dell Latitude 3590
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
580 (min: 483, max: 639) MBit/s ∼85%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
568 (min: 553, max: 591) MBit/s ∼83% -2%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
541 (min: 318, max: 616) MBit/s ∼79% -7%
Average of class Office
  (34 - 688, n=210)
437 MBit/s ∼64% -25%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640Tooltip
Dell Latitude 3590 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø292 (177-317)
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø295 (186-388)
Dell Latitude 14 5495 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø452 (329-553)
Dell Latitude 3590 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø580 (483-639)
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø568 (553-591)
Dell Latitude 14 5495 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø541 (318-616)
223
cd/m²
210
cd/m²
221
cd/m²
210
cd/m²
215
cd/m²
212
cd/m²
203
cd/m²
223
cd/m²
205
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 223 cd/m² Medel: 213.6 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 212 cd/m²
Kontrast: 558:1 (Svärta: 0.385 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.31 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 3.88
ΔE Greyscale 11.84 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
61% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.67
Dell Latitude 3590
BOE0802 / NT15N41 / Dell: M9P74, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
Lenovo B156HAN02.1, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Latitude 14 5495
CMN14C9, , 1920x1080, 14
Response Times
-94%
2581%
3250%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41 (22, 19)
47.2 (23.6, 23.6)
-15%
44 (23, 21)
-7%
41 (24, 17)
-0%
Response Time Black / White *
12 (8, 4)
32.8 (19.6, 13.2)
-173%
30 (19, 11)
-150%
30 (19, 11)
-150%
PWM Frequency
250 (90)
20000 (90)
7900%
25000 (30)
9900%
Screen
33%
34%
29%
Brightness middle
215
284
32%
290
35%
212
-1%
Brightness
214
272
27%
249
16%
200
-7%
Brightness Distribution
91
92
1%
78
-14%
89
-2%
Black Level *
0.385
0.21
45%
0.38
1%
0.23
40%
Contrast
558
1352
142%
763
37%
922
65%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
10.31
5.3
49%
4.35
58%
4.34
58%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
20.44
18.9
8%
11.06
46%
9.01
56%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.88
4.4
-13%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
11.84
3.2
73%
3.01
75%
2.81
76%
Gamma
2.67 82%
2.41 91%
2.44 90%
2.22 99%
CCT
13398 49%
6736 96%
7198 90%
6286 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
39
37.9
-3%
56
44%
39
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
61
59.7
-2%
86
41%
61
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-31% / 13%
1308% / 622%
1640% / 772%

* ... smaller is better

vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (40.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9439 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670Tooltip
Dell Latitude 3590 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø513 (374.78-570.63)
Dell Latitude 3590 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U; BIOS-Version 1.9.8: Ø531 (428.69-556.66)
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø505 (501.3-526.77)
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø480 (477.83-508.65)
Dell Latitude 14 5495 AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Ryzen 7 2700U: Ø620 (605-670)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
Intel Core i7-8565U
181 Points ∼100% +26%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
148 Points ∼82% +3%
Dell Latitude 3590
Intel Core i5-8250U
144 Points ∼80%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (81 - 147, n=94)
141 Points ∼78% -2%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U
139 Points ∼77% -3%
Average of class Office
  (20 - 193, n=518)
111 Points ∼61% -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
670 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (320 - 730, n=98)
568 Points ∼85% +1%
Dell Latitude 3590
Intel Core i5-8250U
565 Points ∼84%
Dell Latitude 3590
Intel Core i5-8250U
429 Points ∼64% -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
Intel Core i7-8565U
527 Points ∼79% -7%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U
508 Points ∼76% -10%
Average of class Office
  (36 - 1050, n=526)
337 Points ∼50% -40%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
429 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
144 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), 8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G
3884 Points ∼100% +44%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
2778 Points ∼72% +3%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2688 - 3082, n=64)
2733 Points ∼70% +2%
Dell Latitude 3590
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ
2688 Points ∼69%
Average of class Office
  (320 - 3884, n=136)
2603 Points ∼67% -3%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
Vega 10, 2700U, Intel SSDSCKKF256G8
2206 Points ∼57% -18%
Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), 8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G
7964 Points ∼100% +40%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3851 - 6653, n=64)
5730 Points ∼72% +1%
Dell Latitude 3590
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ
5687 Points ∼71%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
5505 Points ∼69% -3%
Average of class Office
  (1266 - 7964, n=136)
5415 Points ∼68% -5%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
Vega 10, 2700U, Intel SSDSCKKF256G8
3571 Points ∼45% -37%
Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), 8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G
8523 Points ∼100% +13%
Dell Latitude 3590
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ
7529 Points ∼88%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (5855 - 9289, n=64)
7400 Points ∼87% -2%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
7021 Points ∼82% -7%
Average of class Office
  (2683 - 8992, n=136)
6875 Points ∼81% -9%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
Vega 10, 2700U, Intel SSDSCKKF256G8
5957 Points ∼70% -21%
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), 8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G
4597 Points ∼100% +32%
Dell Latitude 3590
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ
3487 Points ∼76%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
3407 Points ∼74% -2%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3407 - 4081, n=64)
3288 Points ∼72% -6%
Average of class Office
  (803 - 4597, n=137)
3214 Points ∼70% -8%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
Vega 10, 2700U, Intel SSDSCKKF256G8
2585 Points ∼56% -26%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), 8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G
5389 Points ∼100% +14%
Dell Latitude 3590
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ
4727 Points ∼88%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2699 - 5106, n=56)
4649 Points ∼86% -2%
Average of class Office
  (1226 - 5428, n=337)
4008 Points ∼74% -15%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
Vega 10, 2700U, Intel SSDSCKKF256G8
2438 Points ∼45% -48%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), 8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G
4770 Points ∼100% +35%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2986 - 4458, n=67)
3598 Points ∼75% +2%
Dell Latitude 3590
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ
3532 Points ∼74%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
Vega 10, 2700U, Intel SSDSCKKF256G8
3256 Points ∼68% -8%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
3113 Points ∼65% -12%
Average of class Office
  (1169 - 4770, n=393)
3046 Points ∼64% -14%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3532 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4727 poäng
Hjälp
Dell Latitude 3590
Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
Dell Latitude 14 5495
Intel SSDSCKKF256G8
Average Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
61%
-4%
-21%
-7%
Write 4K
79.52
111.2
40%
80.14
1%
48.45
-39%
78.3 (77.1 - 79.5, n=2)
-2%
Read 4K
32.72
49.01
50%
32.05
-2%
25.11
-23%
32.4 (32 - 32.7, n=2)
-1%
Write Seq
472.5
585.8
24%
505.4
7%
341.2
-28%
480 (473 - 488, n=2)
2%
Read Seq
503.5
783.1
56%
527.9
5%
520.6
3%
510 (504 - 517, n=2)
1%
Write 4K Q32T1
322.6
263
-18%
204.9
-36%
202
-37%
227 (132 - 323, n=2)
-30%
Read 4K Q32T1
249.9
481.5
93%
226.6
-9%
243.5
-3%
197 (145 - 250, n=2)
-21%
Write Seq Q32T1
530.5
784.2
48%
532.7
0%
320.8
-40%
519 (507 - 531, n=2)
-2%
Read Seq Q32T1
544.3
1602
194%
550.7
1%
555.2
2%
542 (540 - 544, n=2)
0%
Write 4K Q8T8
247.5
Read 4K Q8T8
253.4
AS SSD
-2%
-15%
-45%
-17%
Copy Game MB/s
404.95
260.04
197
Copy Program MB/s
165.41
152.14
84.5
Copy ISO MB/s
532.41
441.25
272
Score Total
1060
1706
61%
971
-8%
751
-29%
844 (628 - 1060, n=2)
-20%
Score Write
364
478
31%
284
-22%
288
-21%
314 (264 - 364, n=2)
-14%
Score Read
457
822
80%
448
-2%
309
-32%
346 (234 - 457, n=2)
-24%
Access Time Write *
0.042
0.228
-443%
0.046
-10%
0.101
-140%
0.0595 (0.042 - 0.077, n=2)
-42%
Access Time Read *
0.06
0.162
-170%
0.129
-115%
0.128
-113%
0.0775 (0.06 - 0.095, n=2)
-29%
4K-64 Write
247.71
314.07
27%
156.1
-37%
225.18
-9%
202 (156 - 248, n=2)
-18%
4K-64 Read
372.48
642.76
73%
366.77
-2%
238.42
-36%
265 (157 - 372, n=2)
-29%
4K Write
79.85
90.27
13%
78.8
-1%
34.58
-57%
71.5 (63.2 - 79.9, n=2)
-10%
4K Read
34.65
47.61
37%
30.36
-12%
19.76
-43%
31.3 (28 - 34.7, n=2)
-10%
Seq Write
361.68
735.36
103%
493.27
36%
286.49
-21%
408 (362 - 455, n=2)
13%
Seq Read
498.72
1316
164%
512.88
3%
507.15
2%
496 (493 - 499, n=2)
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
30% / 24%
-10% / -11%
-33% / -35%
-12% / -12%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ
Sequential Read: 506 MB/s
Sequential Write: 473.5 MB/s
512K Read: 458.4 MB/s
512K Write: 382.3 MB/s
4K Read: 33.71 MB/s
4K Write: 71.14 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 262.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 257.7 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8565U
5332 Points ∼100% +221%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
3080 Points ∼58% +85%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 1979, n=153)
1705 Points ∼32% +3%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1672 Points ∼31% +1%
Dell Latitude 3590
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1661 Points ∼31%
Average of class Office
  (185 - 5332, n=640)
1289 Points ∼24% -22%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8565U
3678 Points ∼100% +254%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
1835 Points ∼50% +77%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1401, n=122)
1117 Points ∼30% +8%
Dell Latitude 3590
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1039 Points ∼28%
Average of class Office
  (138 - 4109, n=462)
997 Points ∼27% -4%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8565U
19931 Points ∼100% +137%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
10773 Points ∼54% +28%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11436, n=139)
9101 Points ∼46% +8%
Dell Latitude 3590
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
8411 Points ∼42%
Average of class Office
  (1208 - 27117, n=509)
6914 Points ∼35% -18%
3DMark 11 Performance
1778 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6006 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
968 poäng
Hjälp
BioShock Infinite
1366x768 Medium Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
Intel Core i7-8565U, AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
99.3 fps ∼100% +237%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (11.5 - 45.5, n=139)
32.1 fps ∼32% +9%
Average of class Office
  (7.18 - 145, n=355)
31.1 fps ∼31% +5%
Dell Latitude 3590
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
29.5 fps ∼30%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
11.5 fps ∼12% -61%
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
Intel Core i7-8565U, AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
171.5 fps ∼100% +227%
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
85.7 fps ∼50% +64%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (18.3 - 83, n=139)
59.7 fps ∼35% +14%
Average of class Office
  (12.2 - 208, n=357)
55.3 fps ∼32% +6%
Dell Latitude 3590
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
52.4 fps ∼31%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
18.3 fps ∼11% -65%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset
Dell Latitude 14 5495
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
37.6 fps ∼100% +101%
Average of class Office
  (6.2 - 111, n=106)
27.2 fps ∼72% +45%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (10.4 - 111, n=70)
21.4 fps ∼57% +14%
Dell Latitude 3590
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
18.7 fps ∼50%
låg med. hög ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 52.429.5fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 18.7fps
Farming Simulator 19 (2018) 54.820.8fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
30.6 / 31.9 / 31.9 dB(A)
Hög belastning
39 / 39.1 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.530.530.3312527.726.724.625.13129.827.428.325.1402627.727.5255024.726.425.123.36326.229.825.223.18027.425.223.12410023.123.522.923.612522.121.321.722.616021.821.622.121.820022.422.72222.3250222221.321.731521.921.62122.740023.321.820.623.250023.321.920.2246302422.319.424.58002321.118.923.1100022.821.218.322.8125022.420.917.922.3160022.620.717.122.4200021.719.516.721.2250021.919.616.221315021.118.916.121.1400021.61915.821.3500022.419.615.622.3630019.617.515.419.3800017.816.915.517.11000016.916.115.4161250016.616.415.215.51600021.121.514.815.3SPL33.93229.433.7N21.71.22median 22median 21.1median 17.9median 22.3Delta0.81.62.51.73332.133.931.8333233.633.330.73233.733.232.832.933.733.130.331.730.233.129.63131.53029.628.226.929.927.828.227.227.627.827.427.226.126.326.326.526.126.726.325.725.826.724.425.423.925.324.424.324.323.322.724.323.122.222.522.723.122.721.322.22222.722.321.621.42122.320.620.320.320.120.620.220.120.119.820.219.919.519.518.919.920.619.920.518.320.621.319.3201821.320.819.719.718.120.819.618.918.917.919.618.918.318.318.118.918.518.318.318.118.518.418.518.318.318.418.718.618.618.418.718.818.618.618.618.818.918.818.918.818.91918.818.918.81918.918.718.918.618.919.618.920.218.719.631.931.431.530.931.91.51.41.41.31.5median 20.2median 19.5median 20median 18.8median 20.22.12.22.11.72.133.639.532.23133.433.634.235.534.331.432.134.241.735.338.836.432.941.737.136.334.730.632.137.132.434.23331.831.732.430.730.129.327.928.930.727.131.428.627.132.527.126.127.426.625.429.626.126.127.926.324.926.126.124.926.524.822.725.424.924.626.924.622.923.124.624.627.924.922.522.224.625.231.125.321.321.625.223.827.723.519.72123.824.329.323.819.82024.323.22823.31918.623.225.833.125.618.41825.827.435.627.218.217.827.424.432.624.118.217.624.423.630.823.317.917.523.623.631.623.917.917.323.623.630.123.717.917.923.622.331.622.218.31822.321.732.721.518.518.121.72129.120.818.718.32120.426.42018.918.520.420.325.719.619.118.720.320.123.819.619.118.820.120.12119.619.218.920.120.420.319.719.41920.435.543.135.330.830.635.52.14.12.11.31.32.1median 23.6median 28median 23.7median 19.1median 18.7median 23.61.92.51.91.621.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GEToshiba Tecra A50-E-110Dell Latitude 14 5495
Låg belastning
 25.8 °C25.6 °C23 °C 
 25.6 °C26.3 °C22.9 °C 
 24.8 °C23 °C25.8 °C 
Max: 26.3 °C
Medel: 24.8 °C
22.1 °C24.8 °C25.2 °C
22 °C24.9 °C24.5 °C
21.9 °C22.4 °C23.1 °C
Max: 25.2 °C
Medel: 23.4 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  27.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.7 °C / 81.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.4 °C / 0.7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.133.834.12533.834.333.83134.437.334.44030.633.430.6502933.2296332.629.832.68030.427.730.410028.525.728.512534.725.534.716035.224.935.220033.324.233.325045.223.345.231552.222.252.24005621.25650052.72052.763054.619.554.680063.918.763.9100072.518.372.5125069.71869.7160065.817.465.8200067.517.667.5250066.717.666.7315066.917.966.9400068.717.968.7500065.918.265.9630065.318.265.380005418.1541000057.618.257.61250062.418.262.41600062.718.262.7SPL78.830.678.8N391.339median 62.4median 18.2median 62.4Delta8.928.930.931.830.931.930.731.934.932.934.930.330.230.331.63031.628.127.828.127.727.427.725.826.525.825.725.825.725.325.325.323.922.723.923.222.723.227.32227.345214554.620.154.65519.85556.618.956.654.418.354.455.31855.371.718.171.771.817.971.86518.16565.618.165.662.518.362.558.218.458.255.518.655.560.318.860.358.918.858.955.618.655.651.418.751.477.430.977.430.71.330.7median 55.3median 18.8median 55.310.31.710.334.533.434.538.332.138.339.932.939.936.532.136.536.931.736.931.228.931.23232.53240.429.640.44526.14543.125.443.146.423.146.452.622.252.654.921.654.957.92157.964.52064.569.418.669.476.11876.172.317.872.367.817.667.868.817.568.868.217.368.265.917.965.968.61868.664.718.164.767.118.367.164.218.564.261.518.761.561.518.861.562.918.962.963.91963.980.630.680.644.91.344.9median 64.2median 18.7median 64.26.826.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell Latitude 3590Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110Dell Latitude 14 5495
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell Latitude 3590 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.46 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Dell Latitude 14 5495 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.07 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.27 / 0.75 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 4.3 / 7.2 / 9.8 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 38 / 24 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dell Latitude 3590
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
8565U, Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Latitude 14 5495
2700U, Vega 10, Intel SSDSCKKF256G8, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
 
Average of class Office
 
Power Consumption
-43%
-3%
-4%
-11%
-53%
Idle Minimum *
4.3
3.48
19%
3.8
12%
4.3
-0%
3.9 (1 - 12.4, n=161)
9%
7.63 (2.34 - 32, n=953)
-77%
Idle Average *
7.2
7.2
-0%
7.7
-7%
6.6
8%
7.15 (4.3 - 15.5, n=161)
1%
11.4 (4.2 - 42, n=953)
-58%
Idle Maximum *
9.8
10.2
-4%
9.3
5%
7.7
21%
9 (5.2 - 16.6, n=161)
8%
13.9 (5 - 67, n=953)
-42%
Load Average *
38
59.6
-57%
31
18%
32
16%
35.3 (12.9 - 51.6, n=161)
7%
37.2 (7.43 - 99.3, n=938)
2%
Load Maximum *
24
65.1
-171%
34.6
-44%
40
-67%
43.6 (22 - 79, n=161)
-82%
45.8 (12.2 - 129, n=940)
-91%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
20tim 9min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9tim 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10tim 18min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 9min
Dell Latitude 3590
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE
8565U, Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), 45 Wh
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Dell Latitude 14 5495
2700U, Vega 10, 61 Wh
Average of class Office
 
Battery Runtime
-15%
-47%
3%
-33%
Reader / Idle
1209
1133
-6%
1089
-10%
570 (101 - 1857, n=794)
-53%
H.264
618
541
-12%
708
15%
428 (139 - 834, n=175)
-31%
WiFi v1.3
544
423
-22%
291
-47%
562
3%
411 (105 - 964, n=335)
-24%
Load
129
105
-19%
136
5%
101 (37 - 259, n=743)
-22%

För

+ Rejält och välkonstruerat chassi
+ Anslutbarhet som är väl lämpad för kontorsbruk
+ Komplett säkerhetssvit
+ Riktigt bra tangentbord
+ Bättre styrplatta
+ Riktigt låg energiförbrukning
+ Lång batteritid

Emot

- Drar åt sig fingeravtryck
- Skärmen böjer sig för lätt
- Långsam SD-kortläsare
- Alldeles för låg mottagningsprestanda för WLAN
- Problematisk service
- Endast 1 års garanti
- Skärmen är dålig på alla sätt
- Fläkten surrar och tjuter
- Kaotiska klockfrekvens- och fläktprofiler
- Massiv strypning med oregelbunden prestanda
- Högtalarna presterar dåligt
Dell Latitude 3590 - recensionsex från:
Dell Latitude 3590 - recensionsex från:

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

På den positiva sidan av fördel/nackdel-listan har detta misslyckade försök till en kontorslaptop ändå riktigt bra inmatningsenheter och väldigt bra batteritid. På så sätt levererar Dell Latitude 15 3590 på sina utlovade proffsambitioner. Detta gäller också det inkluderade säkerhetspaketet och de företagsorienterade anslutbarhetsalternativen. Chassit imponerar också.

Det som däremot är oacceptabelt på en enhet för 8.000 kronor är skärmen, som är förskräcklig på alla sätt som kan tänkas. Det är en TN-skärm med horribla betraktningsvinklar, miserabel kontrast, en skarp blå ton vid leverans och ett riktigt lågt färgomfång. Utöver detta kommer en undermålig kortläsare, påtagligt dålig WLAN-prestanda och en fläkt som konstant tjuter i bakgrunden trots att datorn knappt är under belastning alls. Detta beror utan tvekan på den oanvändbara fläktprofilen och fläktkontrollen, som resulterar i helt kaotiska klockfrekvensbeteenden och massiv sporadisk strypning vid belastning.

Det är inte utan att man undrar vad Dell tänkte när de släppte denna i princip ofärdiga dator. Vår rekommendation är tydlig: Undvik!

Det skulle faktiskt vara en utmaning att hitta en mindre elegant och sämre utvecklad kontors/företagslaptop i det här prisskiktet.

Dell Latitude 3590 - 07/08/2019 v6
Sven Kloevekorn

Design
76 / 98 → 78%
Tangentbord
89%
Mus
94%
Anslutningar
56 / 80 → 70%
Vikt
63 / 20-67 → 90%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
74%
Spelprestanda
48 / 68 → 70%
Programprestanda
87 / 92 → 95%
Temperatur
94%
Ljudnivå
79%
Audio
50%
Camera
40 / 85 → 46%
Subjektivt intryck
-3%
Medel
67%
80%
Office - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Dell Latitude 3590 - Kontorslaptop med stora brister
Sven Kloevekorn, 2019-07- 4 (Update: 2019-07- 4)