Notebookcheck

Test: CUBOT R11 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Wimmer (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 08/02/2018

Billig och glänsande. CUBOT R11 är en budgetenhet som har mycket att erbjuda. Ren Android, ett löstagbart batteri, en fingeravtrycksläsare och dubbla bakåtriktade kameror för under 1.000 kronor låter som ett utmärkt erbjudande. I den här recensionen får du reda på huruvida CUBOT R11 lever upp till förväntningarna.

Cubot R11
Processor
Mediatek MT6580M
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-400 MP2
Minne
2048 MB 
Skärm
5.5 tum 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixlar 293 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 12.8 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: Upp till 64 GB microSD-kort, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Ljussensor, G-sensor, Fingeravtrycksläsare, Närhetssensor
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS: 850, 900, 1,700, 1,900, 2,100 MHz., Dual SIM, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.85 x 150.3 x 71.4
Batteri
10.64 Wh, 2800 mAh Litiumjon, removeable
Operativsystem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix , f/2.4, Kontrast-autofokus, LED-blixt. 2 MP skärpedjupssensor
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix , fast fokus, LED-blixt
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare på enhetens undersida, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Laddare, USB-kabel, Skyddsfodral, FM-Radio, fanless
Vikt
166 g, Strömförsörjning: 56 g
Pris
99 Kr

 

CUBOT R11
CUBOT R11
CUBOT R11
CUBOT R11
CUBOT R11
CUBOT R11

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (30.5 - 939, n=243)
189 MBit/s ∼100% +268%
Cubot R11
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.3 MBit/s ∼27%
Nokia 1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 8 GB eMMC Flash
49.1 MBit/s ∼26% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.1 MBit/s ∼25% -8%
Blackview A20
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash
44.4 MBit/s ∼23% -13%
Lenovo Moto E4
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.1 MBit/s ∼23% -16%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 703, n=243)
185 MBit/s ∼100% +247%
Cubot R11
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.3 MBit/s ∼29%
Nokia 1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 8 GB eMMC Flash
51.2 MBit/s ∼28% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49 MBit/s ∼26% -8%
Lenovo Moto E4
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.1 MBit/s ∼25% -14%
Blackview A20
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash
46 MBit/s ∼25% -14%
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Skogsområde
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Skogsområde
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
GPS test: CUBOT R11 - Översikt
GPS test: CUBOT R11 - Översikt
GPS test: CUBOT R11 – Skogsområde
GPS test: CUBOT R11 – Skogsområde
GPS test: CUBOT R11 – Bro
GPS test: CUBOT R11 – Bro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
357
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 471 cd/m² Medel: 401 cd/m² Minimum: 16.58 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 72 %
Mitt på batteriet: 428 cd/m²
Kontrast: 486:1 (Svärta: 0.88 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.29 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
89.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.718
Cubot R11
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Blackview A20
IPS, 960x480, 5.5
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo Moto E4
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Nokia 1
IPS, 854x480, 4.5
Screen
-18%
20%
53%
54%
Brightness middle
428
364
-15%
503
18%
488
14%
256
-40%
Brightness
401
375
-6%
499
24%
474
18%
251
-37%
Brightness Distribution
72
90
25%
84
17%
87
21%
89
24%
Black Level *
0.88
0.71
19%
0.73
17%
0.3
66%
0.12
86%
Contrast
486
513
6%
689
42%
1627
235%
2133
339%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.29
10.12
-61%
5.44
14%
5.4
14%
4.82
23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
13.2
19.63
-49%
10.01
24%
9
32%
11.75
11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.9
11.1
-61%
6.8
1%
5.5
20%
5.2
25%
Gamma
2.718 88%
2.722 88%
2.451 98%
2.27 106%
2.3 104%
CCT
7296 89%
10121 64%
6590 99%
7397 88%
7107 91%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8882 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Cubot R11
23275 Points ∼33%
Blackview A20
24802 Points ∼35% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
36883 Points ∼52% +58%
Lenovo Moto E4
30856 Points ∼44% +33%
Nokia 1
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (15185 - 25237, n=9)
22287 Points ∼31% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=336)
70824 Points ∼100% +204%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Cubot R11
19465 Points ∼19%
Blackview A20
19581 Points ∼19% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
43861 Points ∼43% +125%
Nokia 1
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (19465 - 21088, n=3)
20045 Points ∼20% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (25692 - 290397, n=114)
102559 Points ∼100% +427%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Cubot R11
2516 Points ∼54%
Blackview A20
2696 Points ∼58% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
4559 Points ∼98% +81%
Lenovo Moto E4
3518 Points ∼75% +40%
Nokia 1
3054 Points ∼65% +21%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2516 - 3041, n=9)
2740 Points ∼59% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (2516 - 10264, n=366)
4673 Points ∼100% +86%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Cubot R11
10 Points ∼1%
Blackview A20
580 Points ∼80% +5700%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
723 Points ∼100% +7130%
Lenovo Moto E4
617 Points ∼85% +6070%
Nokia 1
571 Points ∼79% +5610%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (9 - 640, n=9)
448 Points ∼62% +4380%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=442)
670 Points ∼93% +6600%
Graphics (sort by value)
Cubot R11
136 Points ∼9%
Blackview A20
145 Points ∼10% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
444 Points ∼30% +226%
Lenovo Moto E4
208 Points ∼14% +53%
Nokia 1
176 Points ∼12% +29%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (136 - 145, n=9)
139 Points ∼9% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=442)
1502 Points ∼100% +1004%
Memory (sort by value)
Cubot R11
346 Points ∼31%
Blackview A20
376 Points ∼33% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
762 Points ∼68% +120%
Lenovo Moto E4
576 Points ∼51% +66%
Nokia 1
505 Points ∼45% +46%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (189 - 404, n=9)
328 Points ∼29% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=442)
1123 Points ∼100% +225%
System (sort by value)
Cubot R11
958 Points ∼43%
Blackview A20
969 Points ∼43% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1463 Points ∼65% +53%
Lenovo Moto E4
1077 Points ∼48% +12%
Nokia 1
859 Points ∼38% -10%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (958 - 1011, n=9)
982 Points ∼44% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=442)
2241 Points ∼100% +134%
Overall (sort by value)
Cubot R11
144 Points ∼13%
Blackview A20
418 Points ∼37% +190%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
774 Points ∼68% +438%
Lenovo Moto E4
531 Points ∼47% +269%
Nokia 1
457 Points ∼40% +217%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (144 - 432, n=9)
342 Points ∼30% +138%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=445)
1132 Points ∼100% +686%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Cubot R11
836 Points ∼22%
Blackview A20
858 Points ∼23% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1333 Points ∼35% +59%
Lenovo Moto E4
938 Points ∼25% +12%
Nokia 1
943 Points ∼25% +13%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (773 - 858, n=3)
822 Points ∼22% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14362, n=139)
3810 Points ∼100% +356%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Cubot R11
1131 Points ∼29%
Blackview A20
1160 Points ∼29% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1874 Points ∼47% +66%
Lenovo Moto E4
1532 Points ∼39% +35%
Nokia 1
1252 Points ∼32% +11%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (1131 - 1237, n=3)
1176 Points ∼30% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 10558, n=186)
3955 Points ∼100% +250%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Cubot R11
394 Points ∼34%
Blackview A20
427 Points ∼36% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
681 Points ∼58% +73%
Lenovo Moto E4
530 Points ∼45% +35%
Nokia 1
492 Points ∼42% +25%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (394 - 427, n=3)
415 Points ∼35% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=187)
1171 Points ∼100% +197%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Cubot R11
7498 Points ∼62%
Blackview A20
8200 Points ∼68% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
10556 Points ∼87% +41%
Lenovo Moto E4
8266 Points ∼68% +10%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (7498 - 8913, n=9)
7991 Points ∼66% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 36494, n=477)
12140 Points ∼100% +62%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Cubot R11
2433 Points ∼16%
Blackview A20
2470 Points ∼16% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
5532 Points ∼36% +127%
Lenovo Moto E4
3168 Points ∼20% +30%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2396 - 2485, n=9)
2463 Points ∼16% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=477)
15561 Points ∼100% +540%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Cubot R11
2863 Points ∼21%
Blackview A20
2924 Points ∼22% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
6186 Points ∼46% +116%
Lenovo Moto E4
3671 Points ∼27% +28%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2841 - 2946, n=9)
2910 Points ∼22% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=478)
13454 Points ∼100% +370%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Cubot R11
4.1 fps ∼15%
Blackview A20
4.4 fps ∼16% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
7.7 fps ∼29% +88%
Lenovo Moto E4
6 fps ∼22% +46%
Nokia 1
5.1 fps ∼19% +24%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (4.1 - 11, n=9)
5.07 fps ∼19% +24%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=503)
26.9 fps ∼100% +556%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Cubot R11
6.9 fps ∼29%
Blackview A20
10 fps ∼43% +45%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
14 fps ∼60% +103%
Lenovo Moto E4
11 fps ∼47% +59%
Nokia 1
14 fps ∼60% +103%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (4.4 - 11, n=9)
8.19 fps ∼35% +19%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=506)
23.5 fps ∼100% +241%

Legend

 
Cubot R11 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 5A Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto E4 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (11 - 224, n=361)
33.6 Points ∼100% +177%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)
17.927 Points ∼53% +48%
Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60)
14.57 Points ∼43% +20%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (11.4 - 14.5, n=9)
13.4 Points ∼40% +11%
Cubot R11 (Chrome 67)
12.124 Points ∼36%
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66)
11.55 Points ∼34% -5%
Blackview A20 (Chrome 67)
11.351 Points ∼34% -6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=497)
5005 Points ∼100% +133%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)
3224 Points ∼64% +50%
Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60)
2270 Points ∼45% +6%
Cubot R11 (Chrome 67)
2144 Points ∼43%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (1769 - 2280, n=9)
2113 Points ∼42% -1%
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66)
1907 Points ∼38% -11%
Blackview A20 (Chrome 67)
1769 Points ∼35% -17%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Cubot R11 (Chrome 67)
21256.7 ms * ∼100%
Blackview A20 (Chrome 67)
19213 ms * ∼90% +10%
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66)
18927 ms * ∼89% +11%
Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60)
17184.6 ms * ∼81% +19%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (14579 - 21257, n=9)
16475 ms * ∼78% +22%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)
13112.2 ms * ∼62% +38%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=516)
11897 ms * ∼56% +44%

* ... smaller is better

Cubot R11Blackview A20Xiaomi Redmi 5ALenovo Moto E4Nokia 1Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-12%
293%
215%
13%
140%
206%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
6.38 (Kingston 32GB)
11.2 (Kingston 32GB)
76%
62.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
881%
44.9
604%
36.9 (6.38 - 65.4, n=103)
478%
43.8 (6.38 - 87.1, n=270)
587%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
10.8 (Kingston 32GB)
20.6 (Kingston 32GB)
91%
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
686%
65.4
506%
55.3 (10.8 - 87.7, n=103)
412%
62.1 (10.8 - 96.5, n=270)
475%
Random Write 4KB
10.8
3.4
-69%
9.28
-14%
29.2
170%
9.1
-16%
7.24 (0.49 - 37.9, n=218)
-33%
13.5 (0.14 - 164, n=550)
25%
Random Read 4KB
22.1
11.3
-49%
42.32
91%
18.7
-15%
25.7
16%
19.7 (2.49 - 61.7, n=218)
-11%
34.5 (1.59 - 173, n=550)
56%
Sequential Write 256KB
52
8
-85%
49.86
-4%
45.3
-13%
51.8
0%
41 (8.74 - 97.6, n=218)
-21%
71.7 (2.99 - 228, n=550)
38%
Sequential Read 256KB
135.8
90.2
-34%
293.76
116%
187.6
38%
208.3
53%
156 (9.66 - 294, n=218)
15%
211 (12.1 - 832, n=550)
55%
Hög belastning
 39.5 °C32.8 °C31.8 °C 
 41.2 °C32.7 °C32.8 °C 
 39.7 °C32.7 °C32.1 °C 
Max: 41.2 °C
Medel: 35 °C
31.9 °C32.8 °C39.5 °C
32.1 °C32.5 °C40.3 °C
32.1 °C33.2 °C39.1 °C
Max: 40.3 °C
Medel: 34.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  39.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.731.32530.136.23130.530.24031.132.55033.739.66326.735.78024.229.710022.924.112519.422.716018.11920017.721.825016.526.731514.236.140013.647.650013.752.363012.457.180012.462.610001266.312501265.4160011.564.6200011.663.5250011.465.3315011.368.2400011.370.6500011.371.2630011.558.8800011.543.91000011.557.11250011.458.71600011.344.7SPL67.452.324.278N19.48.80.637.5median 12Cubot R11median 57.1Delta1.614.32727.825.927.629.532.231.428.732.634.224.123.223.122.724.123.117.21916.623.616.833.216.438.714.147.513.85713.662.712.163.311.564.211.566.911.265.511.263.511.264.711.26511.166.211.266.111.266.711.465.211.466.811.360.811.450.311.441.86023.977.113.70.539.7median 11.4Xiaomi Redmi 5Amedian 63.31.811.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Cubot R11 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Redmi 5A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.5 / 2.2 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.6 / 6 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Cubot R11
2800 mAh
Blackview A20
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4
2800 mAh
Nokia 1
2150 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6580M
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-8%
8%
2%
12%
-0%
5%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
1.1
-22%
1.2
-33%
0.87
3%
0.9
-0%
0.796 (0.56 - 1.1, n=9)
12%
0.866 (0.2 - 3.4, n=576)
4%
Idle Average *
1.5
1.5
-0%
1.5
-0%
2.38
-59%
1.5
-0%
1.789 (1.36 - 2.26, n=9)
-19%
1.697 (0.6 - 6.2, n=575)
-13%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
2.3
-5%
1.8
18%
2.47
-12%
2
9%
2.08 (1.38 - 2.39, n=9)
5%
1.945 (0.74 - 6.6, n=576)
12%
Load Average *
4.6
4.8
-4%
2.9
37%
2.63
43%
3.5
24%
4.83 (3.11 - 6.97, n=9)
-5%
3.97 (0.8 - 10.8, n=570)
14%
Load Maximum *
6
6.5
-8%
4.8
20%
3.86
36%
4.3
28%
5.62 (3.59 - 7.03, n=9)
6%
5.6 (1.2 - 14.2, n=570)
7%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10tim 33min
Cubot R11
2800 mAh
Blackview A20
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4
2800 mAh
Nokia 1
2150 mAh
Battery Runtime
-12%
59%
-18%
-13%
Reader / Idle
1302
WiFi v1.3
633
556
-12%
1009
59%
522
-18%
552
-13%
Load
316
H.264
608

För

+ stabilt hölje
+ lång batteritid
+ löstagbart batteri

Emot

- dålig prestanda
- svag högtalare
- skärm med låg kontrast
- ingen garanti från tillverkaren
Recension av CUBOT R11.
Recension av CUBOT R11.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

CUBOT R11 är en enhet för under 1.000 kronor som imponerar med ett robust hölje och lång batteritid. Men det finns många enheter för ett liknande pris som har mer kraft, bättre kameror och stöd för LTE. Men på plus-sidan har CUBOT R11 ett utbytbart batteri, 2:1-skärmförhållande och kompakta dimensioner. Det sistnämnda är en fördel för den som har små händer.

CUBOT R11 är en gedigen budget-smartphone som har bra batteritid, ett utbytbart batteri och ett robust hölje. En kraftigare SoC hade dock gjort underverk.

Sammanfattningsvis, CUBOT R11 är en typisk instegs-smartphone som lyckas bra på en del områden men är sämre på andra.

Cubot R11 - 07/26/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Design
70%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
79%
Anslutningar
32 / 60 → 53%
Vikt
91%
Batteri
93%
Skärm
77%
Spelprestanda
4 / 63 → 7%
Programprestanda
21 / 70 → 30%
Temperatur
89%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
47 / 91 → 52%
Camera
45%
Medel
63%
74%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: CUBOT R11 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Florian Wimmer, 2018-08- 2 (Update: 2018-08- 2)