Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: CUBOT R11 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Cubot R11 | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 | |
| Blackview A20 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Cubot R11 | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Blackview A20 | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 72 %
Mitt på batteriet: 428 cd/m²
Kontrast: 486:1 (Svärta: 0.88 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.29 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
89.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.718
| Cubot R11 IPS, 1440x720, 5.50 | Blackview A20 IPS, 960x480, 5.50 | Xiaomi Redmi 5A IPS, 1280x720, 5.00 | Lenovo Moto E4 IPS, 1280x720, 5.00 | Nokia 1 IPS, 854x480, 4.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -18% | 20% | 53% | 54% | |
| Brightness middle | 428 | 364 -15% | 503 18% | 488 14% | 256 -40% |
| Brightness | 401 | 375 -6% | 499 24% | 474 18% | 251 -37% |
| Brightness Distribution | 72 | 90 25% | 84 17% | 87 21% | 89 24% |
| Black Level * | 0.88 | 0.71 19% | 0.73 17% | 0.3 66% | 0.12 86% |
| Contrast | 486 | 513 6% | 689 42% | 1627 235% | 2133 339% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.29 | 10.12 -61% | 5.44 14% | 5.4 14% | 4.82 23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.2 | 19.63 -49% | 10.01 24% | 9 32% | 11.75 11% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.9 | 11.1 -61% | 6.8 1% | 5.5 20% | 5.2 25% |
| Gamma | 2.718 81% | 2.722 81% | 2.451 90% | 2.27 97% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 7296 89% | 10121 64% | 6590 99% | 7397 88% | 7107 91% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Cubot R11 | |
| Blackview A20 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6580M (15185 - 25237, n=10) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Cubot R11 | |
| Blackview A20 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6580M (17073 - 21088, n=4) | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Cubot R11 | |
| Blackview A20 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6580M (2516 - 3041, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| Cubot R11 | |
| Blackview A20 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6580M (2841 - 2946, n=12) | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
| Cubot R11 | |
| Blackview A20 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6580M (2396 - 2485, n=12) | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Cubot R11 | |
| Blackview A20 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6580M (7498 - 8913, n=12) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Cubot R11 | |
| Blackview A20 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6580M (4.4 - 12, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Cubot R11 | |
| Blackview A20 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 | |
| Nokia 1 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6580M (4.1 - 11, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67) | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6580M (10.8 - 14.5, n=10) | |
| Cubot R11 (Chrome 67) | |
| Nokia 1 (Chrome 66) | |
| Blackview A20 (Chrome 67) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=212, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67) | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60) | |
| Cubot R11 (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6580M (1645 - 2280, n=10) | |
| Nokia 1 (Chrome 66) | |
| Blackview A20 (Chrome 67) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Cubot R11 (Chrome 67) | |
| Blackview A20 (Chrome 67) | |
| Nokia 1 (Chrome 66) | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 (Chrome 60) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6580M (14579 - 21257, n=11) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Cubot R11 | Blackview A20 | Xiaomi Redmi 5A | Lenovo Moto E4 | Nokia 1 | Average 16 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -12% | 293% | 215% | 13% | 158% | 1618% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 135.8 | 90.2 -34% | 293.8 116% | 187.6 38% | 208.3 53% | 164.5 ? 21% | 1502 ? 1006% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 52 | 8 -85% | 49.86 -4% | 45.3 -13% | 51.8 0% | 43 ? -17% | 1111 ? 2037% |
| Random Read 4KB | 22.1 | 11.3 -49% | 42.32 91% | 18.7 -15% | 25.7 16% | 21.7 ? -2% | 247 ? 1018% |
| Random Write 4KB | 10.8 | 3.4 -69% | 9.28 -14% | 29.2 170% | 9.1 -16% | 8.08 ? -25% | 271 ? 2409% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 10.8 ? | 20.6 ? 91% | 84.9 ? 686% | 65.4 506% | 59.1 ? 447% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 6.38 ? | 11.2 ? 76% | 62.6 ? 881% | 44.9 604% | 39.8 ? 524% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Cubot R11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 57.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 57.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 57.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0 / 0.1 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.9 / 1.5 / 2.2 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
4.6 / 6 Watt |
    
| |
| Cubot R11 2800 mAh | Blackview A20 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 5A 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto E4 2800 mAh | Nokia 1 2150 mAh | Average Mediatek MT6580M | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -8% | 8% | 2% | 12% | 0% | -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.9 | 1.1 -22% | 1.2 -33% | 0.87 3% | 0.9 -0% | 0.805 ? 11% | 0.897 ? -0% |
| Idle Average * | 1.5 | 1.5 -0% | 1.5 -0% | 2.38 -59% | 1.5 -0% | 1.736 ? -16% | 1.452 ? 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.2 | 2.3 -5% | 1.8 18% | 2.47 -12% | 2 9% | 2.1 ? 5% | 1.629 ? 26% |
| Load Average * | 4.6 | 4.8 -4% | 2.9 37% | 2.63 43% | 3.5 24% | 4.82 ? -5% | 5.55 ? -21% |
| Load Maximum * | 6 | 6.5 -8% | 4.8 20% | 3.86 36% | 4.3 28% | 5.68 ? 5% | 8.31 ? -39% |
* ... smaller is better
| Cubot R11 2800 mAh | Blackview A20 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 5A 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto E4 2800 mAh | Nokia 1 2150 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -12% | 59% | -18% | -13% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 633 | 556 -12% | 1009 59% | 522 -18% | 552 -13% |
| Reader / Idle | 1302 | ||||
| H.264 | 608 | ||||
| Load | 316 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
CUBOT R11 är en enhet för under 1.000 kronor som imponerar med ett robust hölje och lång batteritid. Men det finns många enheter för ett liknande pris som har mer kraft, bättre kameror och stöd för LTE. Men på plus-sidan har CUBOT R11 ett utbytbart batteri, 2:1-skärmförhållande och kompakta dimensioner. Det sistnämnda är en fördel för den som har små händer.
CUBOT R11 är en gedigen budget-smartphone som har bra batteritid, ett utbytbart batteri och ett robust hölje. En kraftigare SoC hade dock gjort underverk.
Sammanfattningsvis, CUBOT R11 är en typisk instegs-smartphone som lyckas bra på en del områden men är sämre på andra.
Cubot R11
-
07/26/2018 v6(old)
Florian Wimmer
Pricecompare
