Notebookcheck

Test: Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA (i5-7200U, FHD) (sammanfattning)

Allen Ngo, 07/05/2017

Tunn och billig. Den lättviktiga, relativt billiga och attraktiva VivoBook S15 S510 ser OK ut, men den flexibla basenheten, det svampiga tangentbordet och den korta batteritiden säger något annat.

Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA (VivoBook S Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i5-7200U
Grafikkort
Intel HD Graphics 620, Kärna: 300 MHz, Minne: 1067 MHz, DDR4, 21.20.16.4565
Minne
16384 MB 
, DDR4, PC4-19200, SDRAM, Dual-Channel, 15-15-15-35
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 1920x1080 pixlar 141 PPI, ID: LGD0573, Name: LG Display LP156WF9-SPK2, IPS, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Hårddisk
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY, 128 GB 
, Sekundär: 1 TB Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172
Ljudkort
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Anslutningar
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Kortläsare: SD-kortläsare, Brightness Sensor
Nätverk
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 17.9 x 361.4 x 243.5
Batteri
42 Wh Litiumpolymer, 3 celler
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: VGA
Övrigt
Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Asus Giftbox, ZenLink, MyAsus, SmartAudio, McAfee Anti-Virus, 12 Månader Garanti
Vikt
1.62 kg, Strömförsörjning: 170 g

 

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a loyal reader of notebookcheck? Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Especially wanted: 
English-Swedish-Translator - 
Details here
News Editor - Details here

Review Editor - 
Details here

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Left: 2x USB 2.0, SD reader
Left: 2x USB 2.0, SD reader
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Right: 3.5 mm combo audio, USB Type-C Gen. 1, HDMI, USB 3.0, AC adapter
Right: 3.5 mm combo audio, USB Type-C Gen. 1, HDMI, USB 3.0, AC adapter
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
60.9 MB/s ∼100% +92%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
31.8 MB/s ∼52%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
22.2 MB/s ∼36% -30%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
88.39 MB/s ∼100% +163%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
33.62 MB/s ∼38%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
27.2 MB/s ∼31% -19%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
639 MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
347 MBit/s ∼54% -46%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)
246 MBit/s ∼38% -62%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
490 MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
343 MBit/s ∼70% -30%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)
306 MBit/s ∼62% -38%
263.1
cd/m²
257.6
cd/m²
248.7
cd/m²
278.9
cd/m²
277.5
cd/m²
254.2
cd/m²
278.8
cd/m²
274.7
cd/m²
248.8
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Max: 278.9 cd/m² Medel: 264.7 cd/m² Minimum: 14.58 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 277.5 cd/m²
Kontrast: 793:1 (Svärta: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3 | - Ø
69.3% sRGB (Argyll) 37.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.39
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
ID: LGD0573, Name: LG Display LP156WF9-SPK2, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
BOE0693, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Apple APPA030, IPS, 15.4, 2880x1800
HP Envy 15-as133cl
Chi Mei CMN15D8, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
AU Optronics AUO38ED B156HTN 28H80, TN, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
-8%
-18%
-66%
-15%
-15%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38.4 (19.2, 19.2)
39 (20, 19)
-2%
42 (13.2, 28.8)
-9%
46 (18, 28)
-20%
44.4 (16, 28.4)
-16%
36 (17, 19)
6%
Response Time Black / White *
26.4 (15.6, 10.8)
30 (19, 11)
-14%
33.6 (7.6, 26)
-27%
56 (11, 45)
-112%
30 (6.4, 23.6)
-14%
36 (19, 17)
-36%
PWM Frequency
20000 (90)
198.4
119000 (80)
1000 (99)
Screen
-12%
-4%
42%
5%
-83%
Brightness
265
252
-5%
174
-34%
401
51%
240
-9%
235
-11%
Brightness Distribution
89
87
-2%
69
-22%
90
1%
83
-7%
75
-16%
Black Level *
0.35
0.3
14%
0.18
49%
0.3
14%
0.24
31%
0.55
-57%
Contrast
793
853
8%
1036
31%
1400
77%
1093
38%
447
-44%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.8
5.4
-13%
5.7
-19%
3.33
31%
5
-4%
10.97
-129%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3
5.37
-79%
4.4
-47%
2.73
9%
3.2
-7%
14.25
-375%
Gamma
2.39 100%
2.58 93%
2.35 102%
2.48 97%
2.45 98%
1.83 131%
CCT
6854 95%
6795 96%
6963 93%
6457 101%
6817 95%
11200 58%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37.7
37
-2%
44.71
19%
78.09
107%
40.5
7%
35
-7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
69.3
58
-16%
64.95
-6%
99.97
44%
63.5
-8%
55
-21%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-10% / -11%
-11% / -7%
-12% / 20%
-5% / 1%
-49% / -69%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.6 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.2 ms rise
↘ 19.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
145 Points ∼74% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
143 Points ∼73% +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Core i5-6267U
131 Points ∼67% 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel Core i5-7200U
131 Points ∼67%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼66% -2%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
115 Points ∼59% -12%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
108 Points ∼55% -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
99 Points ∼51% -24%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
86 Points ∼44% -34%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
77 Points ∼39% -41%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
369 Points ∼17% +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
351 Points ∼16% +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Core i5-6267U
339 Points ∼16% +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel Core i5-7200U
335 Points ∼16%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
328 Points ∼15% -2%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
288 Points ∼13% -14%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
257 Points ∼12% -23%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
256 Points ∼12% -24%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
229 Points ∼11% -32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
223 Points ∼10% -33%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.67 Points ∼76% +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
1.59 Points ∼72% +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.49 Points ∼67%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.47 Points ∼67% -1%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
1.33 Points ∼60% -11%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
1.28 Points ∼58% -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
1.14 Points ∼52% -23%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
1.03 Points ∼47% -31%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
0.86 Points ∼39% -42%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
4.13 Points ∼17% +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.87 Points ∼16% +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.69 Points ∼15%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.67 Points ∼15% -1%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
3.19 Points ∼13% -14%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
2.85 Points ∼12% -23%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
2.81 Points ∼12% -24%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
2.49 Points ∼10% -33%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
2.47 Points ∼10% -33%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel Core i5-7200U
5016 Points ∼57%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
4999 Points ∼56% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
4835 Points ∼54% -4%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
4359 Points ∼49% -13%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
4134 Points ∼47% -18%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
3871 Points ∼44% -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
3725 Points ∼42% -26%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
2621 Points ∼30% -48%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel Core i5-7200U
11412 Points ∼23%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
11292 Points ∼23% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel Core i7-7500U
11109 Points ∼22% -3%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
9852 Points ∼20% -14%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
8718 Points ∼18% -24%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
8672 Points ∼17% -24%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
7580 Points ∼15% -34%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
6854 Points ∼14% -40%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
790 s * ∼9% -71%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
644.6 s * ∼8% -40%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
475.655 s * ∼6% -3%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
467.287 s * ∼6% -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel Core i5-7200U
460.884 s * ∼5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
446.9 s * ∼5% +3%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD PRO A12-9800B
907.625 Seconds * ∼4% -48%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
849 Seconds * ∼4% -38%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
817.6 Seconds * ∼4% -33%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel Core i5-7200U
655.742 Seconds * ∼3% -7%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel Core i5-7200U
615.019 Seconds * ∼3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
Intel Core i5-7300U
560 Seconds * ∼2% +9%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8813
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11412
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5016
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
39.29 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.69 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.49 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
49.04 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
335 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
131 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L
4755 Points ∼73% 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY
4746 Points ∼73%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4340 Points ∼67% -9%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L
4984 Points ∼54% +8%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY
4627 Points ∼50%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4089 Points ∼44% -12%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L
4066 Points ∼68% +6%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY
3831 Points ∼64%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3424 Points ∼57% -11%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3831 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4627 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4746 poäng
Hjälp
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY
Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE
Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Apple SSD SM1024L
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
51%
-91%
165%
29%
Write 4k QD32
94.27
253
168%
0.893
-99%
562.1
496%
255.1
171%
Read 4k QD32
250.3
361.6
44%
0.81
-100%
679.3
171%
279.6
12%
Write 4k
64.61
108.1
67%
1.008
-98%
10.9
-83%
85.44
32%
Read 4k
19.48
39.51
103%
0.429
-98%
9.786
-50%
27.11
39%
Write 512
342
307.7
-10%
40.02
-88%
1058
209%
304
-11%
Read 512
417.7
414.8
-1%
34.08
-92%
913.7
119%
338.9
-19%
Write Seq
396
511.1
29%
105.2
-73%
1440
264%
422.8
7%
Read Seq
502.6
531.5
6%
109.5
-78%
1458
190%
485.8
-3%
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY
Sequential Read: 502.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 396 MB/s
512K Read: 417.7 MB/s
512K Write: 342 MB/s
4K Read: 19.48 MB/s
4K Write: 64.61 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 250.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 94.27 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2609 Points ∼16% +58%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
2597 Points ∼16% +57%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1650 Points ∼10%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
1525 Points ∼10% -8%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B
1454 Points ∼9% -12%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B
1060 Points ∼7% -36%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
1401 Points ∼9% -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1219 Points ∼8% -26%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
892 Points ∼6% -46%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
2696 Points ∼5% +70%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2576 Points ∼5% +62%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B
2210 Points ∼4% +39%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B
1829 Points ∼4% +15%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
1834 Points ∼4% +16%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1587 Points ∼3%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1508 Points ∼3% -5%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
1343 Points ∼3% -15%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1309 Points ∼3% -18%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2115 Points ∼5% +100%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
1657 Points ∼4% +57%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B
1466 Points ∼4% +39%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B
1013 Points ∼2% -4%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1055 Points ∼3%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
1010 Points ∼2% -4%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
786 Points ∼2% -25%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
672 Points ∼2% -36%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)
Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U
13172 Points ∼8% +49%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
11821 Points ∼7% +33%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
8861 Points ∼5%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
6924 Points ∼4% -22%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
6189 Points ∼4% -30%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
5592 Points ∼3% -37%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B
5311 Points ∼3% -40%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
51806 Points ∼7%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
37343 Points ∼5% -28%
Dell Latitude 5280
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
34077 Points ∼5% -34%
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
33758 Points ∼5% -35%
HP EliteBook 725 G4
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), PRO A12-9800B
32389 Points ∼4% -37%
3DMark 11 Performance
1768 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
69286 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6704 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
965 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
449 poäng
Hjälp
låg med. hög ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 62.733.928.68.8fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 825620fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
30.2 / 30.2 / 30.2 dB(A)
Hårddisk
30.2 dB(A)
Hög belastning
36.9 / 37 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY
Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
Noise
0%
-9%
-4%
-11%
off / environment *
28.2
30.2
-7%
29
-3%
30.3
-7%
Idle Minimum *
30.2
30.2
-0%
32.2
-7%
30.3
-0%
30.9
-2%
Idle Average *
30.2
30.2
-0%
32.2
-7%
30.3
-0%
30.9
-2%
Idle Maximum *
30.2
32
-6%
33.7
-12%
30.3
-0%
31
-3%
Load Average *
36.9
34.7
6%
39.4
-7%
35.1
5%
46.5
-26%
Load Maximum *
37
33.9
8%
42.2
-14%
46
-24%
46.8
-26%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 28 °C35.6 °C34.6 °C 
 25.6 °C46 °C41.4 °C 
 25.6 °C26.4 °C32.4 °C 
Max: 46 °C
Medel: 32.8 °C
31.8 °C39.4 °C30 °C
45 °C38.2 °C26.6 °C
32 °C28.2 °C27 °C
Max: 45 °C
Medel: 33.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  43 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.339.82537.136.93134.936.24033.934.65032.934.26332.633.98031.733.210029.931.812530.334.416029.544.620028.347.925028.45331526.956.540026.358.65002660.963025.362.68002560.8100025.156.9125024.460160023.96320002461.3250023.657.1315023.755.6400023.559.1500023.466.5630023.562.3800023.365.91000023.363.71250023.362.91600023.362.1SPL36.473.9N2.733.8median 24.4Asus VivoBook S15 S510UAmedian 60Delta1.55.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.42 / 0.62 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 4.6 / 7.6 / 7.7 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 35.1 / 36.2 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
7500U, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
6920HQ, Radeon Pro 460, Apple SSD SM1024L, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4
HP Envy 15-as133cl
7500U, HD Graphics 620, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-5%
-33%
-62%
10%
Idle Minimum *
4.6
4
13%
6.16
-34%
3
35%
4.6
-0%
Idle Average *
7.6
9.6
-26%
8.48
-12%
9.9
-30%
7.7
-1%
Idle Maximum *
7.7
9.7
-26%
9.62
-25%
12.5
-62%
7.8
-1%
Load Average *
35.1
27.7
21%
41.63
-19%
70.6
-101%
30.5
13%
Load Maximum *
36.2
38.4
-6%
63.22
-75%
90.8
-151%
22.7
37%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
10tim 14min
Surfa med WLAN v1.3
4tim 19min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 10min
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
Lenovo V510-15IKB 80WQ0002GE
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 32 Wh
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
7500U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
6920HQ, Radeon Pro 460, 76 Wh
HP Envy 15-as133cl
7500U, HD Graphics 620, 52 Wh
Battery Runtime
-13%
2%
57%
18%
Reader / Idle
614
438
-29%
573
-7%
WiFi v1.3
259
225
-13%
220
-15%
619
139%
408
58%
Load
70
106
51%
52
-26%
72
3%

För

+ 2 interna lagringsplatser, RAM kan uppgraderas
+ maximal CPU-Turbo-prestanda
+ relativt enkla underhållsmöjligheter
+ tunn och mycket lättviktig
+ attraktiv design
+ skapliga stereohögtalare
+ USB Type-C Gen. 1
+ lågt flätljud
+ ingen PWM

Emot

- svag återkoppling från tangentbordet
- dålig pekplatta
- batteritid under genomsnittet
- ingen Thunderbolt 3 eller mDP
- flexibel basenhet i plast
- långsam SD-kortläsare
In review: Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA. Test model provided by Computer Upgrade King. Use coupon code NBC50Off to shave off $50 USD for a final price of $749 USD
In review: Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA. Test model provided by Computer Upgrade King. Use coupon code NBC50Off to shave off $50 USD for a final price of $749 USD

Läs det kompletta originaltestet på engelska här

VivoBook S510-serien utformades för att vara billigare än ZenBook, XPS och Specter-serierna – utan att vara tyngre eller mindre attraktiv. I grunden handlar det om en budgetvariant av en bärbar dator i supertunn flaggskeppsdesign.

Asus har hittat rätt prismässigt med S510UA, som börjar på mindre än 8 500 kr exkl. mervärdesskatt. Dess tunna ramar ger den naturligtvis ett mindre fotavtryck jämfört med konkurrenter som Pavilion, Inspiron eller IdeaPad-familjerna. Något vi särskilt uppskattar är att man inte snålat på skärmens kvalitet eller den grundläggande prestandan – processorn kan bibehålla Turbo Boost-hastighet utan problem. Det relativt låga fläktljudet är ett annat plus, särskilt i jämförelse med XPS 15:s mer upphetsade fläktar.

Det är däremot svårt att ha överseende med de punkter på vilka S510UA fallerar. Chassit är inte särskilt styvt, vilket betyder att både tangentbordet och pekplattan inte känns så fasta som de borde. Och tittar man på undersidan av chassit ser datorn plötsligt ganska billig ut. 

Batteritiden är inte heller särskilt imponerande. Förhoppningen är att är det handlar om hårdvarufel med vår testenhet snarare en indikation på ett större problem med den nya VivoBook S15-serien. 

Vi kan absolut rekommendera VivoBook S15 S510 som ersättare för en äldre HP Pavilion 15 eller Asus F-serie om pris och mobilitet är viktiga punkter. Annars kan användare som vill investera 2-3 tusenlappar till få en överlägsen upplevelse med en instegsmodell av (Asus) ZenBook, (Dell) XPS eller (HP) Spectre.

Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA - 06/11/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Design
78 / 98 → 79%
Tangentbord
72%
Mus
75%
Anslutningar
42 / 81 → 52%
Vikt
68 / 67 → 100%
Batteri
77%
Skärm
82%
Spelprestanda
59 / 85 → 69%
Programprestanda
86 / 92 → 94%
Temperatur
90%
Ljudnivå
92 / 95 → 97%
Audio
64%
Camera
25 / 85 → 29%
Medel
70%
78%
Multimedia - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA (i5-7200U, FHD) (sammanfattning)
Allen Ngo, 2017-07- 5 (Update: 2017-07- 5)