Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Xiaomi Mi A1 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Kontrast: 1359:1 (Svärta: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.223
| Xiaomi Mi A1 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50 | Nokia 6 2018 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50 | BQ Aquaris X Pro IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20 | Lenovo Moto Z2 Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -36% | -45% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 503 | 417 -17% | 458 -9% | 434 -14% |
| Brightness | 478 | 421 -12% | 473 -1% | 404 -15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 88 0% | 88 0% | 81 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.61 -65% | 0.51 -38% | |
| Contrast | 1359 | 684 -50% | 898 -34% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.92 | 6.1 -56% | 7.1 -81% | 4.4 -12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.86 | 11.2 -42% | 14.5 -84% | 8.6 -9% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 7.1 -45% | 10.5 -114% | 4.2 14% |
| Gamma | 2.223 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.28 96% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 7884 82% | 8362 78% | 8951 73% | 7343 89% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (59867 - 68348, n=17) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (7.4 - 19, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 10, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 14, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Nokia 6 2018 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.5 - 14, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59) | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (21.3 - 31.8, n=17) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59) | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3781 - 4979, n=17) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65) | |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8028 - 12194, n=17) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Mi A1 | Nokia 6 2018 | BQ Aquaris X Pro | Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 4% | -6% | 78% | 49% | 1199% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 277.4 | 272.6 -2% | 270.5 -2% | 245.6 -11% | 273 ? -2% | 1508 ? 444% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 202.4 | 118.3 -42% | 139.6 -31% | 137.5 -32% | 176.8 ? -13% | 1118 ? 452% |
| Random Read 4KB | 78.1 | 38.78 -50% | 37.97 -51% | 38.2 -51% | 59.1 ? -24% | 247 ? 216% |
| Random Write 4KB | 7.19 | 15.3 113% | 12.07 68% | 47.9 566% | 31.7 ? 341% | 272 ? 3683% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.6 | 83.4 ? 0% | 78.7 ? -6% | 79.7 ? -5% | 77.4 ? -7% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 57.9 | 61.3 ? 6% | 49.77 ? -14% | 58.7 ? 1% | 58.3 ? 1% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Mi A1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nokia 6 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
BQ Aquaris X Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   1.52 / 1.9 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  2.2 / 2.8 / 3.4 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
6.2 / 7.2 Watt |
    
| |
| Xiaomi Mi A1 3080 mAh | Nokia 6 2018 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z2 Play 3000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 49% | 40% | 69% | 37% | 31% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.2 | 0.67 70% | 0.67 70% | 0.45 80% | 0.981 ? 55% | 0.897 ? 59% |
| Idle Average * | 2.8 | 1.76 37% | 1.7 39% | 0.78 72% | 1.985 ? 29% | 1.452 ? 48% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.4 | 1.78 48% | 1.78 48% | 0.84 75% | 2.27 ? 33% | 1.629 ? 52% |
| Load Average * | 6.2 | 2.82 55% | 4.42 29% | 1.69 73% | 3.51 ? 43% | 5.55 ? 10% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.2 | 4.56 37% | 6.3 12% | 3.79 47% | 5.38 ? 25% | 8.31 ? -15% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Mi A1 3080 mAh | Nokia 6 2018 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z2 Play 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 49% | 15% | 18% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 633 | 942 49% | 730 15% | 749 18% |
| Reader / Idle | 1833 | 1840 | 1589 | |
| H.264 | 675 | 644 | 946 | |
| Load | 362 | 254 | 477 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Mi A1 är den första telefonen från Xiaomi som inte levereras med deras egna MIUI-operativsystem, utan den har istället grundläggande Android. Då Mi A1 är en del av Android One-projektet så garanteras du snabba säkerhetsuppdateringar och en uppdateringsgaranti på två år. Då denna smartphone är riktad åt den europeiska marknaden så finns stöd för det ofta nödvändiga LTE-band 20. I fråga om hårdvara så är Xiaomi Mi A1 en väldigt bra mittenskikts-smartphone.
En av fördelarna med denna Xiaomi-telefon är dess kamera som tar utmärkta bilder för sitt prisskikt, komplett med Bokeh-effekt (djuposkärpa). Dessutom har enheten en skarp och ljusstark skärm, processor och arbetsminne som är tillräckliga för vanliga applikationer, USB C och en fungeravtrycksläsare som är väldigt pålitlig även om den inte är den snabbaste på marknaden. Använder man Mi A1 för navigering kan man också vara säker på att ha gjort ett bra val.
Alternativ till Xiaomi Mi A1 är till exempel Nokia 6 (2018), BQ Aquaris x Pro och Motorola Z2 Play. Alla dessa enheter kommer med grundläggande Android och har liknande prestanda. I fråga om pris så ligger Mi A1 för tillfället till och med under dessa alternativa enheter.
Xiaomi Mi A1
-
06/14/2018 v6(old)
Christian Irion