Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Xiaomi Mi 11i - En av de allra billigaste toppskikts-telefonerna med Snapdragon 888 (Sammanfattning)

Nästan en Mi 11. Redmi K40 Pro+ kommer till Europa med namnet Mi 11i och spelar i den stora ligan i fråga om prestanda. Precis som flaggskeppen från Mi 11-serien har även Mi 11i en avancerad Snapdragon 888 SoC. Det är bara priset som tar en annan riktning. Mi 11i går att köpa för 1 000 kronor mindre än den likvärdigt utrustade Xiaomi Mi 11, och trenden går snabbt nedåt.
Xiaomi Mi 11i (Mi 11 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 660
Minne
8 GB 
, LPDDR5
Skärm
6.67 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 395 PPI, Kapacitiv, AMOLED, 120 Hz, FHD , Upp till 1300 nits, DCI-P3 100%, HDR10 , Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja, HDR, 120 Hz
Hårddisk
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 230.6 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: USB-C, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Närhetssensor, 360° Ljussensor, Färgtemperatursensor, Barometer, Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Elektronisk kompass, X-axels linjär motor, IR-sändare, 2x2 MIMO, Wi-Fi Direct, Miracast, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/900/1.800/1.900 MHz), 3G (B1/2/4/5/8), 4G (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/20/28/38/40/41/66), 5G (n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n41/n77/n78), Huvud SAR 0.537 W/kg, Kropp SAR 0.768 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.8 x 163.7 x 76.4
Batteri
4520 mAh Litiumjon
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix Trippelkamera: 108 MP (7p lins, 1/1.52" sensorstorlek, f/1.75); 8 MP (f/2.2, FOV 119°); 5 MP (f/2.4), Video i upp till 8K@30fps, 4K@60fps
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.45, Video i upp till 1080p@60fps
Övrigt
Högtalare: Dubbla högtalare med Dolby Atmos, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare på 33 Watt, USB-C kabel, Typ-C till 3.5 mm adapter, SIM-verktyg, Skyddsfodral, Användarguide, Garanti-info, MIUI 12.5, 12 Månader Garanti, fanless
Vikt
196 g, Strömförsörjning: 86 g
Pris
600 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.6 %
08/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11i
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
196 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85.9 %
05/2021
Asus ZenFone 8
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
169 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash5.92"2400x1080
87.2 %
04/2021
OnePlus 9
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
192 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
85.9 %
04/2021
Realme GT 5G
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
186 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
86 %
04/2021
Xiaomi Poco F3
SD 870, Adreno 650
196 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
87.3 %
02/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
196 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.81"3200x1440

Storleksjämförelse

164.3 mm 74.6 mm 8.06 mm 196 g163.7 mm 76.4 mm 7.8 mm 196 g163.7 mm 76.4 mm 7.8 mm 196 g160 mm 74.2 mm 8.7 mm 192 g158.5 mm 73.3 mm 8.4 mm 186 g148 mm 68.5 mm 8.9 mm 169 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1261 (1192min - 1327max) MBit/s +8%
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1165 (735min - 1229max) MBit/s
Realme GT 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1164 (603min - 1211max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
884 (444min - 914max) MBit/s -24%
OnePlus 9
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
685 (654min - 709max) MBit/s -41%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
519 (391min - 604max) MBit/s -55%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
903 (446min - 918max) MBit/s +14%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
842 (329min - 976max) MBit/s +6%
Realme GT 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
841 (768min - 888max) MBit/s +6%
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
792 (676min - 856max) MBit/s
OnePlus 9
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
777 (623min - 829max) MBit/s -2%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
654 (311min - 702max) MBit/s -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s -53%
065130195260325390455520585650715780845910975104011051170Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi 11i; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø791 (676-856)
Xiaomi Mi 11i; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1165 (735-1229)
GPS-Test: Sammanfattning
GPS-Test: Sammanfattning
GPS-Test: Sjö
GPS-Test: Sjö
GPS-Test: Vägskäl
GPS-Test: Vägskäl

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight - Scene 1Daylight - Scene 2Ultra wide-angle5x zoomLow-light photo
ColorChecker
15.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
10 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 11i: 9.85 ∆E min: 2.17 - max: 22.84 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
59.2 ∆E
48.4 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
27 ∆E
60.3 ∆E
61.2 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
68.1 ∆E
38.4 ∆E
42 ∆E
67.8 ∆E
65.9 ∆E
49.5 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 11i: 42.55 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 68.12 ∆E
863
cd/m²
884
cd/m²
891
cd/m²
865
cd/m²
875
cd/m²
893
cd/m²
866
cd/m²
877
cd/m²
895
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Max: 895 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 878.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.73 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 875 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
Xiaomi Mi 11i
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Asus ZenFone 8
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 5.92
OnePlus 9
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Realme GT 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Xiaomi Poco F3
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Mi 11
LED DotDisplay, 3200x1440, 6.81
Screen
-13%
30%
11%
29%
19%
Brightness middle
875
758
-13%
731
-16%
605
-31%
889
2%
840
-4%
Brightness
879
759
-14%
739
-16%
606
-31%
902
3%
845
-4%
Brightness Distribution
96
98
2%
96
0%
97
1%
95
-1%
98
2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.8
3.5
-94%
0.59
67%
1.3
28%
0.9
50%
1.2
33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.7
1.3
72%
3.1
34%
1.9
60%
2.7
43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.4
1.6
53%
0.9
74%
1.3
62%
1.3
62%
2
41%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.23 99%
2.243 98%
2.25 98%
2.26 97%
2.26 97%
CCT
6220 105%
6527 100%
6573 99%
6372 102%
6614 98%
6492 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 500 Hz ≤ 64 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 64 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1134 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1124 Points -1%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1124 Points -1%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1132 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
998 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1136 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (976 - 1198, n=27)
1118 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=214, last 2 years)
900 Points -21%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3687 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
3385 Points -8%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3653 Points -1%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3379 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3368 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3784 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3204 - 3810, n=27)
3571 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=214, last 2 years)
2947 Points -20%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4273 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5771 Points +35%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3894 Points -9%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4620 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3587 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4279 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3894 - 6176, n=26)
4711 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 15910, n=90, last 2 years)
4248 Points -1%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4403 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
4676 Points +6%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4566 Points +4%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4658 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3606 Points -18%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4674 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3100 - 4786, n=26)
4617 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (434 - 13654, n=82, last 2 years)
4036 Points -8%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
15024 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
16428 Points +9%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
14457 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
13610 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (11435 - 17085, n=21)
14307 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=209, last 2 years)
11643 Points -23%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
13282 Points
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10438 Points -21%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12440 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12876 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10231 - 15027, n=10)
12376 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points -18%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
0 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (7991 - 9221, n=3)
8422 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (712 - 7285, n=52, last 2 years)
3548 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10111 - 13263, n=3)
11212 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (618 - 9451, n=52, last 2 years)
3905 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (4462 - 4609, n=3)
4556 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4525, n=52, last 2 years)
3005 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8783 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
10379 Points +18%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
11018 Points +25%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7970 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (8065 - 11534, n=20)
10135 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=115, last 2 years)
9038 Points +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
15110 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
15652 Points +4%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
16863 Points +12%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12033 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10491 - 17179, n=20)
15130 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=114, last 2 years)
15757 Points +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3562 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
4763 Points +34%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4978 Points +40%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3653 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (2975 - 5434, n=20)
4760 Points +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=114, last 2 years)
4335 Points +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
0 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6140 - 7596, n=2)
6868 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=104, last 2 years)
2680 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6816 - 9436, n=2)
8126 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=104, last 2 years)
2667 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (4514 - 4557, n=2)
4536 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=104, last 2 years)
3126 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
7270 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
8779 Points +21%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
0 Points -100%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8987 Points +24%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7377 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
9343 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6110 - 9839, n=21)
8532 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=177, last 2 years)
6571 Points -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
11406 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
11552 Points +1%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12714 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
9498 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12023 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (7930 - 12914, n=21)
11629 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=176, last 2 years)
9383 Points -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3204 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
4771 Points +49%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4436 Points +38%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4140 Points +29%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5249 Points +64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (2579 - 5366, n=21)
4511 Points +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=176, last 2 years)
4169 Points +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6439, n=98, last 2 years)
2606 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=98, last 2 years)
2765 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 3525, n=98, last 2 years)
2671 Points
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5692 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5767 Points +1%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5786 Points +2%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5942 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4288 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5599 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3958 - 5942, n=26)
5674 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 9839, n=132, last 2 years)
2528 Points -56%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5712 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5821 Points +2%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5751 Points +1%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5925 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4271 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5678 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3959 - 5925, n=26)
5617 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=197, last 2 years)
6135 Points +7%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1503 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1528 Points +2%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1559 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1223 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1236 - 1602, n=21)
1516 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 5226, n=202, last 2 years)
1647 Points +10%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1427 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1512 Points +6%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1555 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1222 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (974 - 1564, n=21)
1421 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=197, last 2 years)
1656 Points +16%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
121 fps
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
119 fps -2%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
61 fps -50%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps -50%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
71 fps -41%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
120 fps -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (60 - 143, n=20)
102.5 fps -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 165, n=180, last 2 years)
83.1 fps -31%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
266 fps
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
238 fps -11%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
275 fps +3%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
268 fps +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
200 fps -25%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
268 fps +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (173 - 294, n=20)
247 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=180, last 2 years)
243 fps -9%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
120 fps
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
116 fps -3%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps -50%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps -50%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
60 fps -50%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
91 fps -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (55 - 121, n=20)
93.9 fps -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=181, last 2 years)
70.8 fps -41%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
151 fps
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
152 fps +1%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
101 fps -33%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
162 fps +7%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
119 fps -21%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
158 fps +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (101 - 180, n=20)
141.7 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.2 - 363, n=181, last 2 years)
137.8 fps -9%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
96 fps
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
93 fps -3%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
57 fps -41%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps -37%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
59 fps -39%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
59 fps -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (36 - 105, n=20)
71.5 fps -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=181, last 2 years)
59.7 fps -38%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
110 fps
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
105 fps -5%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
96 fps -13%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
119 fps +8%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
81 fps -26%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
111 fps +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (69 - 126, n=20)
98.9 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 279, n=181, last 2 years)
97.1 fps -12%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
53 fps -12%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
48 fps -20%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
59 fps -2%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
44 fps -27%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
33 fps -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (26 - 61, n=20)
47.2 fps -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=181, last 2 years)
42.7 fps -29%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
64 fps
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
61 fps -5%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
42 fps -34%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
72 fps +13%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
48 fps -25%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
67 fps +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (42 - 74, n=20)
60.6 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=181, last 2 years)
58.6 fps -8%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
57 fps -5%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
58 fps -3%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
59 fps -2%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
49 fps -18%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
41 fps -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (32 - 73, n=26)
55.7 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=221, last 2 years)
43.1 fps -28%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
68 fps
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
64 fps -6%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
57 fps -16%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
71 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
57 fps -16%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
79 fps +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (46 - 87, n=27)
70.4 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=221, last 2 years)
63.1 fps -7%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
42 fps
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
41 fps -2%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
41 fps -2%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
44 fps +5%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
33 fps -21%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
25 fps -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (25 - 51, n=26)
38.5 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 105, n=221, last 2 years)
32.1 fps -24%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
27 fps
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
26 fps -4%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28 fps +4%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
28 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
22 fps -19%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
29 fps +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (19 - 32, n=26)
27.5 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=221, last 2 years)
25.1 fps -7%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
791672 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
795730 Points +1%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
811533 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
680139 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (636471 - 824694, n=17)
767997 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=151, last 2 years)
738649 Points -7%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
687402 Points
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
713309 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
595585 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
700592 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (569595 - 740847, n=12)
677749 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
101336 Points -85%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
258869 Points
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
Points -100%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
263702 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
111838 Points -57%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
209984 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (171404 - 264766, n=15)
243759 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 139804, n=54, last 2 years)
20600 Points -92%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6852 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
6043 Points -12%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6537 Points -5%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6031 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
6356 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6361 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5839 - 6985, n=20)
6495 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=162, last 2 years)
5686 Points -17%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10610 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
9973 Points -6%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11627 Points +10%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10443 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
9997 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10377 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9119 - 11774, n=20)
10766 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=162, last 2 years)
9595 Points -10%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
7677 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
6300 Points -18%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
7526 Points -2%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5352 Points -30%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7692 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8789 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5352 - 9044, n=20)
7316 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12306, n=162, last 2 years)
6206 Points -19%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
14427 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
13167 Points -9%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
12938 Points -10%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
15346 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12801 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12732 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9399 - 15739, n=20)
13676 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=162, last 2 years)
13856 Points -4%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1876 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1612 Points -14%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1627 Points -13%
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1543 Points -18%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1658 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1434 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1434 - 1983, n=20)
1683 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=162, last 2 years)
1487 Points -21%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 11i (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
115.7 Points
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=170, last 2 years)
103.9 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (61.3 - 125.1, n=13)
96.1 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
83.2 Points -28%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
75.1 Points -35%
OnePlus 9 (MS Edge)
61.3 Points -47%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 11i (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
209.1 Points
Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)
184.5 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (77 - 223, n=19)
168.8 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
137.9 Points -34%
OnePlus 9 (MS Edge)
119.2 Points -43%
Realme GT 5G (Chrome 91)
118.6 Points -43%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
105.4 Points -50%
Average of class Smartphone (66.1 - 104.3, n=2, last 2 years)
85.2 Points -59%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 11i (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
113.1 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=154, last 2 years)
104.4 runs/min -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (46.9 - 121, n=12)
84.1 runs/min -26%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
74.8 runs/min -34%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
62.8 runs/min -44%
OnePlus 9 (MS Edge)
54.7 runs/min -52%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Xiaomi Mi 11i (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
166 Points
Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)
149 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (103 - 182, n=18)
143.1 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (37 - 304, n=119, last 2 years)
131 Points -21%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
125 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
124 Points -25%
OnePlus 9 (MS Edge)
119 Points -28%
Realme GT 5G (Chrome 91)
105 Points -37%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 11i (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
45398 Points
Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)
37926 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (23491 - 47543, n=20)
35591 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=205, last 2 years)
33314 Points -27%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
27539 Points -39%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
26577 Points -41%
OnePlus 9 (Chrome89)
23843 Points -47%
Realme GT 5G (Chrome 91)
23491 Points -48%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Realme GT 5G (Chrome 91)
1841 ms * -99%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
1744 ms * -89%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
1722 ms * -86%
OnePlus 9 (Chrome89)
1692 ms * -83%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=168, last 2 years)
1658 ms * -79%
Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)
1397 ms * -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (891 - 1841, n=20)
1319 ms * -43%
Xiaomi Mi 11i (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
924 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 11iAsus ZenFone 8OnePlus 9Realme GT 5GXiaomi Poco F3Xiaomi Mi 11Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
36%
21%
3%
2%
33%
55%
38%
Sequential Read 256KB
1628
1781
9%
1872
15%
1587
-3%
1378
-15%
1615
-1%
1768 ?(1004 - 2037, n=86)
9%
1471 ?(215 - 4512, n=213, last 2 years)
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB
552
767
39%
739
34%
575
4%
684
24%
754
37%
1136 ?(452 - 1873, n=86)
106%
1084 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=213, last 2 years)
96%
Random Read 4KB
181
292.3
61%
225.4
25%
198.7
10%
208
15%
278.5
54%
281 ?(173.5 - 543, n=86)
55%
243 ?(22.2 - 543, n=213, last 2 years)
34%
Random Write 4KB
205.9
272.9
33%
221.4
8%
208.4
1%
170.6
-17%
289.3
41%
311 ?(197.5 - 499, n=87)
51%
267 ?(13 - 709, n=213, last 2 years)
30%
051015202530Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi 11i; Armajet; 1.60.13: Ø30.2 (30-31)
Xiaomi Mi 11i; PUBG Mobile; 1.5.0: Ø30 (24-31)
Hög belastning
 39.2 °C39 °C36.2 °C 
 39.5 °C39.1 °C36.2 °C 
 38.2 °C37.9 °C35.9 °C 
Max: 39.5 °C
Medel: 37.9 °C
34.9 °C37.1 °C40.1 °C
34.1 °C37.1 °C39 °C
32.6 °C36.9 °C36.4 °C
Max: 40.1 °C
Medel: 36.5 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  29.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.4362527.531.23121.125.54023.923.75033.230.36320.320.38021.621.410025.525.712517.734.916018.25020015.547.525015.353.831517.659.440015.759.750016.665.363014.96980015.272.710001674.8125015.277.5160015.377.8200014.774.7250015.176.6315015.778.4400014.777.8500014.874.4630014.873.3800015.470.21000014.574.21250014.568.21600013.864.8SPL27.487.5N0.971.1median 15.3median 71.1Delta1.28.72634.528.328.623.329.224.328.833.936.422.527.722.525.923.925.617.23719.948.916.548.613.350.917.656.82055.919.66623.268.613.270.712.672.412.674.91473.512.776.512.777.513.278.613.774.613.773.913.974.113.473.31474.614.768.815.763.227.386.80.967.5median 14median 70.72.88.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 11iXiaomi Mi 11
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 11i audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 11 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.37 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.98 / 1.4 / 1.46 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 6.21 / 9.62 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Mi 11i
4520 mAh
Asus ZenFone 8
4000 mAh
OnePlus 9
4500 mAh
Realme GT 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F3
4520 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11
4600 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
24%
-20%
-5%
13%
-31%
-6%
4%
Idle Minimum *
0.98
0.82
16%
0.9
8%
1.14
-16%
0.76
22%
1.57
-60%
1.066 ?(0.46 - 1.8, n=23)
-9%
0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=160, last 2 years)
8%
Idle Average *
1.4
1.1
21%
1.7
-21%
1.84
-31%
1.29
8%
1.92
-37%
1.58 ?(0.74 - 2.6, n=23)
-13%
1.447 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=160, last 2 years)
-3%
Idle Maximum *
1.46
1.16
21%
2.7
-85%
1.87
-28%
1.45
1%
1.94
-33%
1.733 ?(0.78 - 3.1, n=23)
-19%
1.628 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=160, last 2 years)
-12%
Load Average *
6.21
4.24
32%
5.4
13%
4.21
32%
4.6
26%
6.32
-2%
5.46 ?(3.87 - 6.7, n=23)
12%
5.5 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=160, last 2 years)
11%
Load Maximum *
9.62
6.83
29%
11.1
-15%
8.07
16%
8.87
8%
11.65
-21%
9.79 ?(5.89 - 11.7, n=23)
-2%
8.16 ?(4.32 - 20.8, n=160, last 2 years)
15%

* ... smaller is better

Energiförbrukning: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi 11i Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G: Ø5.49 (1.196-9.84)
Realme GT 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G: Ø6.16 (1.438-10.8)

Energiförbrukning: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi 11i Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.69 (6.13-7.93)
Realme GT 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.3 (6.54-10.7)
Xiaomi Mi 11i Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.065 (0.969-1.912)
Realme GT 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.518 (1.315-1.815)
Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
27tim 38min
WiFi Websurfing
11tim 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16tim 57min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 50min
Xiaomi Mi 11i
4520 mAh
Asus ZenFone 8
4000 mAh
OnePlus 9
4500 mAh
Realme GT 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F3
4520 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11
4600 mAh
Battery Runtime
-36%
-7%
9%
4%
-22%
Reader / Idle
1658
1623
-2%
1562
-6%
1144
-31%
H.264
1017
928
-9%
918
-10%
971
-5%
WiFi v1.3
690
442
-36%
854
24%
755
9%
805
17%
527
-24%
Load
290
168
-42%
329
13%
214
-26%

För

+ Ljusstark AMOLED-skärm med hög färgprecision
+ Hög prestanda
+ Snabbt WLAN
+ Exakt GPS
+ Snabb laddning
+ Bra kameror
+ Bra högtalare

Emot

- Ingen IP-certifiering
- Saknar 3.5 mm ljudanslutning
- Saknar microSD-plats
- Stryps vid belastning
- Kort garantiperiod

Omdöme: Xiaomi Mi 11i - Närmar sig Mi 11

Recension av Xiaomi Mi 11i. Recensionsex från
Recension av Xiaomi Mi 11i. Recensionsex från

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Med Mi 11i bryggar Xiaomi det ganska stora gapet mellan Mi 11 Lite 5G och Mi 11. Men tack vare en Snapdragon 888 ligger Mi 11i betydligt närmare Mi 11, som också använder denna toppskikts-SoC. Lagringskapaciteten på 8/128 GB respektive 8/256 GB är också identisk mellan de båda enheterna.

Vad är det då som separerar Mi 11i från Mi 11? På 6.67 tum är den kompaktare än Mi 11 på 6.81 tum och har lägre upplösning (2400x1080 pixlar jämfört med 3200x1440 pixlar). Men AMOLED-skärmarna är ändå jämförbara när det kommer till ljusstyrka och bilduppdatering (120 Hz). Den största skillnaden efter skärmen: Mi 11i har också en kamera på 108 MP, men den använder Samsungs HM2-sensor som inte är lika kraftfull. Foton ser därför lite bättre ut på Mi 11.

Xiaomi Mi 11i är precis lika snabb som Mi 11, men skärmen är inte lika högupplöst och kameramodulen är en aning svagare. Däremot kommer den med 5G som standard och bilduppdatering i 120 Hz, allt till ett lägre instegspris.

Andra mindre skillnader är att Mi 11i inte stödjer lika många LTE- och 5G-band som Mi 11. Laddaren är bara på 33 Watt istället för 55 Watt och telefonen kan heller inte laddas trådlöst. Även om batteriet är en aning mindre på 4520 mAh märks inte detta i praktiken.

realme GT 5G och Xiaomi Poco F3 är bra alternativ till Mi 11i och båda har liknande prestanda och funktionalitet.

Xiaomi Mi 11i - 08/30/2022 v7
Manuel Masiero

Design
86%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Mus
93%
Anslutningar
55 / 70 → 79%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
91%
Spelprestanda
59 / 64 → 93%
Programprestanda
86 / 86 → 100%
Temperatur
90%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 85%
Camera
70%
Medel
81%
87%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Mi 11i - En av de allra billigaste toppskikts-telefonerna med Snapdragon 888 (Sammanfattning)
Manuel Masiero, 2021-08-30 (Update: 2021-08-30)