Notebookcheck

Test: Topjoy Falcon Omvandlingsbar (Sammanfattning, Förproduktionsmodell)

Klaus Hinum, 👁 Klaus Hinum, Katja Steyrleuthner (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 11/05/2018

Mini-laptop. Topjoy Falcon finns för tillfället på Kickstarter och är en liten omvandlingsbar med Windows 10 och en aktivt kyld fyrkärnig Gemini Lake-processor. Vi recenserar en förproduktionsmodell från Topjoy och kör de flesta av våra tester på den. I vår recension får du reda på vilka fördelar och nackdelar denna minidator har.

Topjoy Falcon
Grafikkort
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Minne
8192 MB 
, DDR3-2400 enkel kanal
Skärm
8 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 275 PPI, Multitouch, native pen support, AUO17D8, IPS, glansig: ja
Moderkort
Gemini Lake
Hårddisk
FORESEE 256GB, 256 GB 
, 214 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC269
Anslutningar
2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Ljudanslutningar: Hörlurar
Nätverk
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n/ac)
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 20 x 200 x 130
Batteri
38 Wh Litiumjon, Batteritid (enligt tillverkaren): 8 tim
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Island, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja
Released
10/25/2018
Vikt
680 g
Pris
859 Dollar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

USB-C (troligen Gen.1) med laddningsfunktion, mini-HDMI, ljudport, USB 3.0 (Typ A)
USB-C (troligen Gen.1) med laddningsfunktion, mini-HDMI, ljudport, USB 3.0 (Typ A)
279
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
252
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
264
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 287 cd/m² Medel: 269.1 cd/m² Minimum: 32.8 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 266 cd/m²
Kontrast: 782:1 (Svärta: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.6 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 2.7
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.19
Topjoy Falcon
AUO17D8, , 1920x1080, 8
Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102
PVO, , 1920x1200, 8.9
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Sharp SHP14A6, , 1800x1200, 10
Chuwi LapBook SE
1920x1080, 13.3
Response Times
138%
4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37 (17, 20)
44 (22, 22)
-19%
39.2 (19.2, 20)
-6%
Response Time Black / White *
33.6 (20, 13.6)
25.6 (11.6, 14)
24%
27.7 (14.8, 12.9)
18%
PWM Frequency
200 (100, 266)
1020 (99)
410%
200 (29)
0%
Screen
-22%
53%
-36%
Brightness middle
266
207
-22%
456
71%
227
-15%
Brightness
269
205
-24%
426
58%
210
-22%
Brightness Distribution
88
89
1%
88
0%
89
1%
Black Level *
0.34
0.14
59%
0.31
9%
0.44
-29%
Contrast
782
1479
89%
1471
88%
516
-34%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.6
7.98
-122%
1.3
64%
6.6
-83%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.2
3
63%
12.2
-49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.7
1.1
59%
1.9
30%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.6
8.36
-132%
1.4
61%
7.9
-119%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.21 100%
2.24 98%
2.16 102%
CCT
6442 101%
7768 84%
6687 97%
8879 73%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
41
62.3
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
64
96.8
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-22% / -22%
96% / 74%
-16% / -26%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 13.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting
≤ 266 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % (266 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

Flickering occurs even at high brightness setting and may have an effect on the user during everyday use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8668 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250Tooltip
Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel Pentium Silver N5000: Ø222 (221.28-228.02)
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel Pentium Silver N5000: Ø232 (230.48-237.35)
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel Pentium Silver N5000: Ø230 (228.26-236.29)
Chuwi LapBook SE Intel Celeron N4100, Intel Celeron N4100: Ø158 (150.45-161.13)
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 Intel Core m3-7Y30, Intel Core m3-7Y30: Ø238 (227.93-249.83)
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y: Ø163 (162.13-163.67)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
105 Points ∼100% +35%
Average of class Convertible
  (19 - 177, n=268)
101 Points ∼96% +29%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
91 Points ∼87% +17%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
90 Points ∼86% +15%
Topjoy Falcon
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
78 Points ∼74%
Average Intel Pentium Silver N5000
  (73 - 80, n=6)
77.5 Points ∼74% -1%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
77 Points ∼73% -1%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
73 Points ∼70% -6%
Chuwi LapBook SE
Intel Celeron N4100
69.8 Points ∼66% -11%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
65 Points ∼62% -17%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Intel Atom Z3795
38 Points ∼36% -51%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Convertible
  (33 - 761, n=274)
275 Points ∼100% +19%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
250 (min: 227.93, max: 249.83) Points ∼91% +8%
Average Intel Pentium Silver N5000
  (231 - 284, n=6)
248 Points ∼90% +7%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
237 Points ∼86% +3%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
236 Points ∼86% +2%
Topjoy Falcon
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
231 (min: 221.28, max: 228.02) Points ∼84%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
218 Points ∼79% -6%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
164 Points ∼60% -29%
Chuwi LapBook SE
Intel Celeron N4100
161 (min: 150.45, max: 161.13) Points ∼59% -30%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Intel Atom Z3795
118 Points ∼43% -49%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
78 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
18.22 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
231 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook 12 2017
HD Graphics 615, 7Y32, Apple SSD AP0256
3946 Points ∼100% +26%
Average of class Convertible
  (1007 - 5281, n=197)
3639 Points ∼92% +17%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
3550 Points ∼90% +14%
Average Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel UHD Graphics 605
  (3122 - 3525, n=5)
3270 Points ∼83% +5%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3259 Points ∼83% +4%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3125 Points ∼79% 0%
Topjoy Falcon
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, FORESEE 256GB
3122 Points ∼79%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3795, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1227 Points ∼31% -61%
Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1008 Points ∼26% -68%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook 12 2017
HD Graphics 615, 7Y32, Apple SSD AP0256
3078 Points ∼100% +39%
Average of class Convertible
  (741 - 4741, n=243)
2735 Points ∼89% +23%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW128G7
2685 Points ∼87% +21%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
2550 Points ∼83% +15%
Average Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel UHD Graphics 605
  (2141 - 2381, n=5)
2252 Points ∼73% +2%
Topjoy Falcon
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, FORESEE 256GB
2216 Points ∼72%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2201 Points ∼72% -1%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
2141 Points ∼70% -3%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3795, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1139 Points ∼37% -49%
Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash
911 Points ∼30% -59%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y, 64 GB eMMC Flash
741 Points ∼24% -67%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2216 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
2672 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3122 poäng
Hjälp
Topjoy Falcon
FORESEE 256GB
FORESEE 256GB
Sequential Read: 472.2MB/s
Sequential Write: 431.4MB/s
4K Read: 12.06MB/s
4K Write: 26.05MB/s
4K-64 Read: 87.93MB/s
4K-64 Write: 188MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.23ms
Access Time Write: 0.444ms
Score Read: 147Points
Score Write: 257Points
Score Total: 482Points
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
1383.5 (min: 1376, max: 1390) Points ∼100% +86%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
1257 Points ∼91% +69%
Average of class Convertible
  (173 - 7483, n=297)
1170 Points ∼85% +58%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
757 Points ∼55% +2%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 605
  (612 - 902, n=6)
757 Points ∼55% +2%
Topjoy Falcon
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
742 Points ∼54%
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
626 Points ∼45% -16%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
612 Points ∼44% -18%
Chuwi LapBook SE
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron N4100
482 Points ∼35% -35%
3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
7138 (min: 7124, max: 7152) Points ∼100% +59%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
6602 Points ∼92% +47%
Average of class Convertible
  (1023 - 37388, n=257)
6350 Points ∼89% +42%
Topjoy Falcon
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
4485 Points ∼63%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
4200 Points ∼59% -6%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 605
  (3261 - 4485, n=4)
3824 Points ∼54% -15%
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
3349 Points ∼47% -25%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
3261 Points ∼46% -27%
Chuwi LapBook SE
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron N4100
2826 Points ∼40% -37%
3DMark 06 Standard
4171 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
824 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
3723 poäng
Hjälp
World of Warships - 1366x768 Low Preset AF:Trilinear
HP 15-da0405ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX110, 8250U
89.2 fps ∼100% +261%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3, 2200U
67.3 fps ∼75% +172%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
66.7 (min: 39, max: 89) fps ∼75% +170%
Average of class Convertible
  (15 - 103, n=11)
53.3 fps ∼60% +116%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Intel HD Graphics 610, 4415U
47.3 fps ∼53% +91%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-21-651Y
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge), A6-9220
30 fps ∼34% +21%
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge), E2-9000
25.5 fps ∼29% +3%
Topjoy Falcon
Intel UHD Graphics 605, N5000
24.7 (min: 11, max: 35) fps ∼28%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 605
  (22.7 - 24.7, n=2)
23.7 fps ∼27% -4%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
Intel UHD Graphics 605, N5000
22.7 fps ∼25% -8%
Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE
Intel UHD Graphics 600, N4100
20 fps ∼22% -19%
låg med. hög ultra
World of Warships (2015) 24.7fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 4.4fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 9.165.5fps
Hög belastning
 30 °C30 °C31 °C 
 27 °C30 °C31 °C 
 28 °C29 °C30 °C 
Max: 31 °C
Medel: 29.6 °C
32 °C33 °C28 °C
32 °C31 °C28 °C
32 °C31 °C29 °C
Max: 33 °C
Medel: 30.7 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  32 °C | Rumstemperatur 19 °C | Fluke 62 Mini + Fluke t3000 FC
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.335.12532.931.83131.8324036.535.15032.428.9633328.98036.328.810048.32712561.52716052.924.820060.92425062.822.731563.32240069.521.250067.82163074.82080075.919.4100072.718.912507117.7160070.117.820006917.6250071.817.6315068.117.6400071.417.6500073.717.6630070.417.5800071.617.61000071.617.61250069.617.41600059.717.5SPL83.630.6N62.51.5median 69.6median 17.8Delta4.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.6 / 1.73 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 2.5 / 4 / 4.1 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 8.1 / 19.6 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Topjoy Falcon
N5000, UHD Graphics 605, FORESEE 256GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 8
Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102
Z3735F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 8.9
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1800x1200, 10
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Z3795, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 128 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 8.3
Chuwi LapBook SE
N4100, UHD Graphics 600, SanDisk DF4032, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Average Intel UHD Graphics 605
 
Average of class Convertible
 
Power Consumption
11%
-50%
-51%
-47%
-25%
-120%
Idle Minimum *
2.5
1.8
28%
2.88
-15%
4.9
-96%
2.7
-8%
2.83 (2.3 - 3.4, n=4)
-13%
4.78 (2.2 - 23, n=337)
-91%
Idle Average *
4
3.2
20%
4.8
-20%
7.4
-85%
6.3
-58%
4.93 (4 - 5.9, n=4)
-23%
7.94 (4 - 32.3, n=337)
-99%
Idle Maximum *
4.1
4.4
-7%
7.5
-83%
7.5
-83%
7.6
-85%
5.8 (4.1 - 7.5, n=4)
-41%
9.43 (4.1 - 61, n=337)
-130%
Load Average *
8.1
10.8
-33%
16.9
-109%
11.8
-46%
12.6
-56%
12.9 (8.1 - 15.4, n=4)
-59%
26.3 (1.4 - 94, n=335)
-225%
Load Maximum *
19.6
10.6
46%
23.8
-21%
8.9
55%
24.6
-26%
17.8 (15 - 21.4, n=4)
9%
30.6 (11.2 - 117, n=336)
-56%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5tim 37min
Topjoy Falcon
N5000, UHD Graphics 605, 38 Wh
Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102
Z3735F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 39 Wh
Apple MacBook 12 2017
7Y32, HD Graphics 615, 41.4 Wh
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 28 Wh
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Z3795, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 17.7 Wh
Chuwi LapBook SE
N4100, UHD Graphics 600, 37 Wh
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
N5000, UHD Graphics 605, 39 Wh
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
N5000, UHD Graphics 605, 53.9 Wh
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
7Y30, HD Graphics 615, 48 Wh
Average of class Convertible
 
Battery Runtime
78%
60%
33%
-25%
32%
103%
120%
33%
Reader / Idle
1066
771
763 (117 - 1985, n=274)
WiFi v1.3
337
600
78%
540
60%
448
33%
252
-25%
444
32%
684
103%
740
120%
447 (153 - 1010, n=212)
33%
Load
251
180
347
148 (49 - 677, n=263)
H.264
384
564
607
449 (206 - 1070, n=100)

För

+ Robust hölje
+ Liten storlek
+ Stabil CPU-prestanda tack vare en fläkt
+ Höljet håller sig svalt vid belastning

Emot

- Tangentbordet och styrplattan tar lite tid att vänja sig vid
- Pennan är inte korrekt kalibrerad
- Den nuvarande förproduktionsmodellen har PWM
- Svag WLAN-mottagning

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Topjoy Falcon är en liten omvandlingsbar med ett högkvalitativt hölje. Även om det finns vissa eftergifter rörande inmatningsenheterna så går det, tack vare den inbyggda fläkten, inte att skylla på prestandan från den fyrkärniga Gemini Lake-processorn. När det kommer till skärmen planerar Topjoy fortfarande att göra en del förbättringar och använda en modell som är mer ljusstark. Detta hade annars varit vårt största klagomål på den inbyggda AUO-panelen (utöver att den använder PWM hela vägen upp till 100% ljusstyrka). Vi kan verkligen rekommendera den aktiva pennan som finns som tillval då den gör det betydligt lättare att använda den lilla skärmen.

Totalt sett är Falcon ett riktigt intressant koncept, men den behöver en del finjustering i sin nuvarande form. För det reducerade Kickstarter-priset som börjar på 3.500 kronor kan du få en praktisk andra laptop att ta med på resan till ett lågt pris. Men då får du hoppas på att Topjoy gör sin hemläxa.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Topjoy Falcon Omvandlingsbar (Sammanfattning, Förproduktionsmodell)
Klaus Hinum, 2018-11- 5 (Update: 2018-11- 5)