Notebookcheck

Test: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Andrea Grüblinger (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 10/24/2018

Ren lyx? Namnet säger allt: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS vill erbjuda ren lyx, vilket reflekteras i enhetens oerhört höga pris. I den här recensionen får du reda på huruvida en av världens dyraste telefoner är värd investeringen.

Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G72 MP12
Minne
6144 MB 
Skärm
6 tum 16:8, 2880 x 1440 pixlar 537 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, AMOLED, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 240 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, Ljudanslutningar: Ljudutmatning genom USB Typ C, 2 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Kompass, USB On-The-Go (OTG), Infraröd sändare
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G: 850, ​900, ​1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, ​B2, ​B4, ​B5, ​B6, ​B8, ​B19, ​B34, ​B39. 4G: B1, ​B2, B3, ​B4, ​B5, ​B7, ​B8, ​B9, ​B12, ​B17, ​B18, ​B19, ​B20, ​B26, ​B28, B32, ​B34, ​B38, ​B39, ​B40, ​B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.5 x 152.9 x 72.5
Batteri
15.2 Wh, 4000 mAh Litiumjon, Snabbladdning
Operativsystem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 40 MPix Huvudkamera: f/1.8, Kontrast-autofokus (AF), Laser-autofokus (AF), Fas-autofokus (AF), Dubbel LED-blixt, Video i upp till 2160p, 960 FPS-video i upp till 720p. Monokrom sensor: 20 MP, skärpedjup. Teleobjektiv: 8 MP, f/2.4
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix f/2.0
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Läderfodral, Hörlurar, USB Typ A till Typ C-kabel, Laddare, SIM-verktyg, USB Typ C till 3.5 mm-adapter, 24 Månader Garanti, IP67-certifierad, LTE Cat 18/​13 (1200Mbps/​150Mbps), SAR-värde: 1.2W/​kg (kropp), fanless
Vikt
183 g, Strömförsörjning: 85 g
Pris
1695 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 MBit/s ∼100% +118%
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
650 MBit/s ∼96% +109%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
485 MBit/s ∼72% +56%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 MBit/s ∼50% +9%
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
311 (min: 54, max: 469) MBit/s ∼46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=292)
200 MBit/s ∼30% -36%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
587 MBit/s ∼91% +5%
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
560 (min: 445, max: 611) MBit/s ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
485 MBit/s ∼75% -13%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
225 MBit/s ∼35% -60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=292)
195 MBit/s ∼30% -65%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø310 (54-469)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø560 (445-611)
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Genom ett skogsområde
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Genom ett skogsområde
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bro
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bro
GPS-test: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS - Översikt
GPS-test: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS - Översikt
GPS-test: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS - Genom ett skogsområde
GPS-test: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS - Genom ett skogsområde
GPS-test: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS - Bro
GPS-test: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS - Bro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
ColorChecker: Den nedre delen av varje färgområde visar referensfärgen
ColorChecker: Den nedre delen av varje färgområde visar referensfärgen
Foto av vår testkarta
Foto av vår testkarta
Vår testkarta i detalj
Vår testkarta i detalj
460
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 484 cd/m² Medel: 454.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.05 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 450 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.39 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
134.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.162
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
AMOLED, 2880x1440, 6
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
LCD-IPS, 3840x2160, 5.8
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.4
Apple iPhone XS
OLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Screen
27%
18%
49%
44%
Brightness middle
450
477
6%
499
11%
639
42%
629
40%
Brightness
455
453
0%
506
11%
637
40%
636
40%
Brightness Distribution
89
86
-3%
96
8%
94
6%
94
6%
Black Level *
0.33
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.39
2.1
67%
4.62
28%
1
84%
1.7
73%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.25
8.2
33%
10.91
11%
2.2
82%
3.6
71%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.7
1.6
57%
2.2
41%
2.2
41%
2.4
35%
Gamma
2.162 102%
2.28 96%
2.103 105%
1.9 116%
2.15 102%
CCT
7224 90%
6425 101%
6115 106%
6364 102%
6337 103%
Contrast
1445

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8627 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
181973 Points ∼80%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
226124 Points ∼100% +24%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
214090 Points ∼95% +18%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
177341 Points ∼78% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (173653 - 181973, n=8)
177915 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 250848, n=378)
74328 Points ∼33% -59%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
207800 Points ∼60%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
246366 Points ∼71% +19%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
236552 Points ∼68% +14%
Apple iPhone XS
348178 Points ∼100% +68%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
212278 Points ∼61% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (152773 - 212278, n=6)
197811 Points ∼57% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=152)
112194 Points ∼32% -46%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
6998 Points ∼86%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8178 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
5184 Points ∼63% -26%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6932 Points ∼85% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6293 - 7046, n=8)
6860 Points ∼84% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (4936 - 9868, n=237)
4476 Points ∼55% -36%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
8540 Points ∼87%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
9858 Points ∼100% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
5960 Points ∼60% -30%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8439 Points ∼86% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (8115 - 9326, n=8)
8537 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4101 - 13211, n=403)
4838 Points ∼49% -43%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
1296 Points ∼76%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
1400 Points ∼82% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
1132 Points ∼66% -13%
Apple iPhone XS
1711 Points ∼100% +32%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points ∼72% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1091 - 1316, n=8)
1245 Points ∼73% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=480)
687 Points ∼40% -47%
Graphics (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
3575 Points ∼23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
7743 Points ∼49% +117%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
6506 Points ∼41% +82%
Apple iPhone XS
15875 Points ∼100% +344%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points ∼23% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2231 - 4397, n=8)
3638 Points ∼23% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=480)
1669 Points ∼11% -53%
Memory (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
4578 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3704 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
2068 Points ∼45% -55%
Apple iPhone XS
4169 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points ∼90% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2417 - 4578, n=8)
3946 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=480)
1197 Points ∼26% -74%
System (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
5987 Points ∼49%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8418 Points ∼69% +41%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
6137 Points ∼50% +3%
Apple iPhone XS
12202 Points ∼100% +104%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points ∼43% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3795 - 5987, n=8)
5387 Points ∼44% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=480)
2422 Points ∼20% -60%
Overall (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
3357 Points ∼55%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4288 Points ∼70% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
3110 Points ∼51% -7%
Apple iPhone XS
6097 Points ∼100% +82%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points ∼52% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2174 - 3374, n=8)
3125 Points ∼51% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=484)
1212 Points ∼20% -64%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
5779 Points ∼40%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
14417 Points ∼100% +149%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
9059 Points ∼63% +57%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8572 Points ∼59% +48%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (5779 - 9015, n=6)
8080 Points ∼56% +40%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=177)
4307 Points ∼30% -25%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
6791 Points ∼59%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8522 Points ∼73% +25%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
8874 Points ∼77% +31%
Apple iPhone XS
11598 Points ∼100% +71%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points ∼59% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6557 - 6792, n=8)
6697 Points ∼58% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 11598, n=227)
4213 Points ∼36% -38%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
1908 Points ∼40%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2457 Points ∼51% +29%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
1698 Points ∼35% -11%
Apple iPhone XS
4824 Points ∼100% +153%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points ∼39% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1883 - 1922, n=8)
1901 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=228)
1246 Points ∼26% -35%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
2918 Points ∼81%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3620 Points ∼100% +24%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
2569 Points ∼71% -12%
Apple iPhone XS
2960 Points ∼82% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points ∼79% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2582 - 2931, n=8)
2842 Points ∼79% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 4183, n=333)
1604 Points ∼44% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
3012 Points ∼58%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5190 Points ∼100% +72%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
3673 Points ∼71% +22%
Apple iPhone XS
3712 Points ∼72% +23%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points ∼55% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2844 - 3040, n=8)
2994 Points ∼58% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5241, n=333)
1134 Points ∼22% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
2991 Points ∼63%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4734 Points ∼100% +58%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
3353 Points ∼71% +12%
Apple iPhone XS
3514 Points ∼74% +17%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points ∼60% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2850 - 2999, n=8)
2958 Points ∼62% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=341)
1085 Points ∼23% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
2902 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2541 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
2515 Points ∼87% -13%
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points ∼100% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1906 - 2902, n=8)
2732 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4150, n=364)
1500 Points ∼52% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
3415 Points ∼42%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8219 Points ∼100% +141%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4826 Points ∼59% +41%
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points ∼41% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1954 - 3734, n=8)
3305 Points ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (98 - 8312, n=364)
1551 Points ∼19% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
3286 Points ∼60%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5492 Points ∼100% +67%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4008 Points ∼73% +22%
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points ∼59% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1943 - 3487, n=8)
3155 Points ∼57% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 6378, n=372)
1323 Points ∼24% -60%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
22826 Points ∼62%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
36762 Points ∼100% +61%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
18756 Points ∼51% -18%
Apple iPhone XS
27400 Points ∼75% +20%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points ∼62% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (14556 - 23046, n=8)
21027 Points ∼57% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (7095 - 36762, n=519)
12613 Points ∼34% -45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
32972 Points ∼21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
81502 Points ∼51% +147%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
36190 Points ∼23% +10%
Apple iPhone XS
160199 Points ∼100% +386%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points ∼21% +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (22429 - 36231, n=8)
32596 Points ∼20% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=519)
17318 Points ∼11% -47%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
30008 Points ∼39%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
64152 Points ∼83% +114%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
29994 Points ∼39% 0%
Apple iPhone XS
77128 Points ∼100% +157%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points ∼40% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (20022 - 31605, n=8)
29035 Points ∼38% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=520)
14575 Points ∼19% -51%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
45 fps ∼18%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
150 fps ∼60% +233%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
146 fps ∼58% +224%
Apple iPhone XS
251 fps ∼100% +458%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps ∼45% +149%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (45 - 125, n=8)
108 fps ∼43% +140%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=545)
30.1 fps ∼12% -33%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
42 fps ∼70%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
60 fps ∼100% +43%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
60 fps ∼100% +43%
Apple iPhone XS
60 fps ∼100% +43%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps ∼100% +43%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (42 - 60, n=8)
57.4 fps ∼96% +37%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=548)
24.4 fps ∼41% -42%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
23 fps ∼20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
71 fps ∼62% +209%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
76 fps ∼66% +230%
Apple iPhone XS
115 fps ∼100% +400%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps ∼47% +135%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (23 - 66, n=8)
54.6 fps ∼47% +137%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=467)
16.1 fps ∼14% -30%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
26 fps ∼43%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼97% +123%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
47 fps ∼78% +81%
Apple iPhone XS
60 fps ∼100% +131%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps ∼93% +115%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (26 - 56, n=8)
50.4 fps ∼84% +94%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=470)
15.5 fps ∼26% -40%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
19 fps ∼31%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼94% +205%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
45 fps ∼73% +137%
Apple iPhone XS
62 fps ∼100% +226%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps ∼60% +95%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (19 - 39, n=8)
33.9 fps ∼55% +78%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 88, n=332)
13.7 fps ∼22% -28%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
18 fps ∼32%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
56 fps ∼100% +211%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
25 fps ∼45% +39%
Apple iPhone XS
48 fps ∼86% +167%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps ∼68% +111%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (18 - 39, n=8)
33.6 fps ∼60% +87%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=334)
13.5 fps ∼24% -25%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
11 fps ∼29%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
35 fps ∼92% +218%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
28 fps ∼74% +155%
Apple iPhone XS
38 fps ∼100% +245%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps ∼55% +91%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (11 - 23, n=8)
20.4 fps ∼54% +85%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 54, n=262)
9.48 fps ∼25% -14%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
10 fps ∼27%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
37 fps ∼100% +270%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
15 fps ∼41% +50%
Apple iPhone XS
31 fps ∼84% +210%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps ∼59% +120%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (10 - 23, n=8)
19.8 fps ∼54% +98%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 58, n=265)
8.65 fps ∼23% -13%

Legend

 
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
272.3 Points ∼100% +378%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
71.172 Points ∼26% +25%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)
63.012 Points ∼23% +11%
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS (Chrome 69)
56.981 Points ∼21%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
56.63 Points ∼21% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (33.1 - 58.6, n=8)
51.4 Points ∼19% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=402)
36 Points ∼13% -37%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
43280 Points ∼100% +266%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)
14663 Points ∼34% +24%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
13360 Points ∼31% +13%
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS (Chrome 69)
11838 Points ∼27%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
10406 Points ∼24% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6692 - 11838, n=8)
10111 Points ∼23% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=538)
5400 Points ∼12% -54%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=557)
11641 ms * ∼100% -209%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3591 - 6221, n=8)
4378 ms * ∼38% -16%
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS (Chrome 69)
3762 ms * ∼32%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
3590.6 ms * ∼31% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
3179 ms * ∼27% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)
2710 ms * ∼23% +28%
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
609.1 ms * ∼5% +84%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
345 Points ∼100% +84%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
211 Points ∼61% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)
202 Points ∼59% +8%
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS (Chrome 69)
187 Points ∼54%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (119 - 187, n=8)
165 Points ∼48% -12%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
158 Points ∼46% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=270)
108 Points ∼31% -42%

* ... smaller is better

Porsche Design Huawei Mate RSSony Xperia XZ2 PremiumSamsung Galaxy Note 9Huawei Mate 10 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-34%
-30%
-9%
-16%
-77%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
30.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
45 (3.4 - 87.1, n=309)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
34.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.3 (8.2 - 96.5, n=309)
Random Write 4KB
160.3
21.75
-86%
21
-87%
164.45
3%
91.2 (22.1 - 160, n=2)
-43%
15 (0.14 - 164, n=587)
-91%
Random Read 4KB
144.3
135.99
-6%
134
-7%
132.27
-8%
136 (127 - 144, n=2)
-6%
36.8 (1.59 - 173, n=587)
-74%
Sequential Write 256KB
241.7
170.98
-29%
196
-19%
208.72
-14%
235 (228 - 242, n=2)
-3%
77.1 (2.99 - 246, n=587)
-68%
Sequential Read 256KB
873.1
748.59
-14%
805
-8%
732.46
-16%
780 (687 - 873, n=2)
-11%
223 (12.1 - 895, n=587)
-74%
Arena of Valor
 InställningarVärde
 min31 fps
 high HD30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Asphalt 9: Legends
 InställningarVärde
 High Quality30 fps
 Standard / low30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Hög belastning
 48.3 °C46.1 °C43.3 °C 
 47.1 °C45.3 °C45.1 °C 
 45.3 °C45.2 °C42.7 °C 
Max: 48.3 °C
Medel: 45.4 °C
38.1 °C42 °C47.6 °C
38.6 °C42.1 °C44.8 °C
38.8 °C42 °C43.2 °C
Max: 47.6 °C
Medel: 41.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  43 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.431.72535.230.33137.732.14036355037.737.46323.324.48021.922.510020.122.612518.428.71601938.920016.750.825015.554.531519.75540014.356.850013.856.663012.656.580012.754.2100012.357125011.55916001166.920001170.8250010.872315010.770.5400010.670.1500010.767.9630010.766.8800010.963.31000010.961.91250010.955.21600010.843.1SPL65.663.868.724.179.6N17.814.420.60.641median 11.5median 56.8Delta2.27.335.237.832.934.237.235.631.737.139.64028.327.927.32626.924.326.723.72433.420.941.220.951.919.551.218.560.317.55617.555.915.755.115.865.716.669.515.874.215.47715.574.91673.315.870.41670.816.373.116.372.916.273.516.468.816.455.828.684.41.154.7median 16.4median 65.72.110.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoisePorsche Design Huawei Mate RSHuawei Mate 10 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Mate 10 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1 / 2.7 / 3.8 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.9 / 11.5 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone XS
2658 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
28%
17%
41%
39%
20%
35%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.67
33%
0.9
10%
0.95
5%
0.85
15%
0.978 (0.67 - 1.4, n=8)
2%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=624)
12%
Idle Average *
2.7
2.5
7%
1.9
30%
1.34
50%
1.15
57%
2.12 (1.15 - 2.7, n=8)
21%
1.722 (0.6 - 6.2, n=623)
36%
Idle Maximum *
3.8
2.51
34%
3.7
3%
1.48
61%
1.23
68%
2.51 (1.23 - 4.3, n=8)
34%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=624)
47%
Load Average *
5.9
4.3
27%
5.3
10%
4
32%
4.12
30%
5.01 (2.47 - 6.5, n=8)
15%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=618)
32%
Load Maximum *
11.5
6.87
40%
7.6
34%
5.13
55%
8.42
27%
8.1 (2.49 - 11.5, n=8)
30%
5.72 (1.2 - 14.2, n=618)
50%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
25tim 53min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11tim 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12tim 34min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 46min
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone XS
2658 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-21%
17%
-10%
24%
Reader / Idle
1553
1347
-13%
1687
9%
1442
-7%
1744
12%
H.264
754
520
-31%
896
19%
745
-1%
929
23%
WiFi v1.3
683
547
-20%
794
16%
570
-17%
818
20%
Load
286
235
-18%
354
24%
245
-14%
398
39%

För

+ elegant design
+ stabil och robust
+ bra systemprestanda
+ massor av lagring och RAM
+ toppskikts-prestanda
+ bra batteritid
+ många tillbehör
+ utmärkta kameror
+ snabbt LTE
+ skapliga högtalare

Emot

- extremt dyr
- inexakt GPS
- enheten blir varm
- kraftig strypning vid belastning
- skärmen har PWM-flimmer
- inget stöd för spelande i 60 FPS
- hög energiförbrukning
Recenseras: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS. Recensionsex från Huawei Germany.
Recenseras: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS. Recensionsex från Huawei Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS står ut som den ultimata lyxtelefonen och är ännu dyrare än iPhone XS eller XS Max. Mate RS har en fingeravtrycksläsare som är inbyggd i skärmen, rikligt med minne och utmärka kameror, vilket försöker rättfärdiga enhetens befängda pris. Men enhetens trippelkamerasystem är samma som i P20 Pro och fingeravtrycksläsaren som är inbyggd i skärmen saknar precisionen hos en traditionell sensor.

Mate RS ser tjusig ut med sitt robusta och hållbara hölje. Prestandan är dessutom jämförbar med andra enheter som drivs av en Kirin 970. Men med det sagt så har enheten för många brister för sitt pris. Vår recensionsenhet blir obekvämt varm vid belastning och har kraftig värmestrypning. Energiförbrukningen är dessutom för hög, vilket bidrar till jämförelsevis kort batteritid. Vidare fungerar bildstabiliseringen inte när man spelar in 4K-video och GPS-mottagaren är inte alltid särskilt exakt.

Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS kan inte nå upp till de höga förväntningar som kommer med det absurda priset.

Det finns många flaggskeppsenheter som är mer värda pengarna än Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS. Men få har samma nivå av lyx och prestige som Porsche Design-märket för med sig.

Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS - 10/16/2018 v6
Florian Schmitt

Design
92%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
97%
Anslutningar
51 / 60 → 84%
Vikt
90%
Batteri
94%
Skärm
90%
Spelprestanda
47 / 63 → 75%
Programprestanda
68 / 70 → 97%
Temperatur
84%
Ljudnivå
100%
Camera
97%
Medel
81%
90%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schmitt, 2018-10-24 (Update: 2018-10-30)