Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Oppo Reno6 5G - Mittenskiktstelefon av hög kvalitet (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.8 % | 10/2021 | Oppo Reno6 5G Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4 | 182 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.43" | 2400x1080 | |
| 82.2 % | 04/2021 | Samsung Galaxy A72 SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 203 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
| 85.1 % | 08/2021 | OnePlus Nord 2 5G Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9 | 189 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.43" | 2400x1080 | |
| 83.4 % | 06/2021 | Sony Xperia 10 III SD 690 5G, Adreno 619L | 169 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.00" | 2520x1080 | |
| 85.9 % | 04/2021 | Realme GT 5G SD 888 5G, Adreno 660 | 186 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.43" | 2400x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Realme GT 5G | |
| Oppo Reno6 5G | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 III | |
| Samsung Galaxy A72 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G | |
| Realme GT 5G | |
| Oppo Reno6 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 III | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A72 | |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Close-upPanoramaUltra-wide-angleZoom (5x)Low Light
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 98 %
Mitt på batteriet: 588 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
| Oppo Reno6 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43 | Samsung Galaxy A72 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70 | OnePlus Nord 2 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43 | Sony Xperia 10 III OLED, 2520x1080, 6.00 | Realme GT 5G Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -12% | -10% | 27% | 25% | |
| Brightness middle | 588 | 730 24% | 594 1% | 536 -9% | 605 3% |
| Brightness | 593 | 734 24% | 594 0% | 540 -9% | 606 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 97 -1% | 99 1% | 97 -1% | 97 -1% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 3.2 -23% | 2.74 -5% | 1.1 58% | 1.3 50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.7 | 8.8 -87% | 6 -28% | 1.9 60% | 3.1 34% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 3.5 -6% | 4.2 -27% | 1.3 61% | 1.3 61% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.05 107% | 2.278 97% | 2.27 97% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6573 99% | 6605 98% | 7322 89% | 6494 100% | 6372 102% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 90 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |   |
The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo Reno6 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A72 | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 III | |
| Realme GT 5G | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 900 (35 - 37, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo Reno6 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A72 | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 III | |
| Realme GT 5G | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 900 (40 - 42, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Oppo Reno6 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A72 | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 III | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 900 (362407 - 367407, n=2) | |
| VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
| Oppo Reno6 5G | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 III | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 900 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 900 (50.5 - 77.5, n=4) | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92) | |
| Oppo Reno6 5G (Chrome 93) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A72 (Chrome 90.0.4430.91) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Realme GT 5G (Chrome 91) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 900 (105.7 - 112.4, n=2) | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92) | |
| Oppo Reno6 5G (Chrome 93) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A72 (Chrome 90.0.4430.91) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 900 (49.5 - 52.3, n=3) | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chome 92) | |
| Oppo Reno6 5G (Chrome 93) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A72 (Chrome 90.0.4430.91) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Realme GT 5G (Chrome 91) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91) | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 900 (65 - 71, n=4) | |
| Oppo Reno6 5G (Chrome 93) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A72 (Chrome 90.0.4430.91) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 900 (21753 - 30485, n=5) | |
| Oppo Reno6 5G (Chrome 93) | |
| Realme GT 5G (Chrome 91) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 III | |
| Samsung Galaxy A72 (Chrome 90.0.4430.91) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy A72 (Chrome 90.0.4430.91) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 III (Chrome 91) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 900 (1658 - 2220, n=4) | |
| Realme GT 5G (Chrome 91) | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92) | |
| Oppo Reno6 5G (Chrome 93) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Oppo Reno6 5G | Samsung Galaxy A72 | OnePlus Nord 2 5G | Sony Xperia 10 III | Realme GT 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -53% | 40% | -24% | 4% | -40% | 33% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 988 | 490.8 -50% | 1827 85% | 840 -15% | 1587 61% | 760 ? -23% | 1505 ? 52% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 707 | 260 -63% | 1256 78% | 400.8 -43% | 575 -19% | 297 ? -58% | 1112 ? 57% |
| Random Read 4KB | 230.3 | 119.2 -48% | 223.7 -3% | 172.3 -25% | 198.7 -14% | 152.9 ? -34% | 247 ? 7% |
| Random Write 4KB | 237 | 114.7 -52% | 239 1% | 210.7 -11% | 208.4 -12% | 131.6 ? -44% | 271 ? 14% |
3DMark Wild Life Stress-test
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Oppo Reno6 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.03 / 0.39 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  1.13 / 2.09 / 2.15 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
3.71 / 6.06 Watt |
    
| |
| Oppo Reno6 5G 4300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A72 5000 mAh | OnePlus Nord 2 5G 4500 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 III 4500 mAh | Realme GT 5G 4500 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 900 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 18% | -7% | 46% | -4% | 9% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.13 | 0.86 24% | 0.8 29% | 0.44 61% | 1.14 -1% | 0.97 ? 14% | 0.897 ? 21% |
| Idle Average * | 2.09 | 1.82 13% | 1.2 43% | 0.65 69% | 1.84 12% | 1.655 ? 21% | 1.452 ? 31% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.15 | 1.86 13% | 1.6 26% | 0.69 68% | 1.87 13% | 1.87 ? 13% | 1.629 ? 24% |
| Load Average * | 3.71 | 2.95 20% | 5.7 -54% | 2.99 19% | 4.21 -13% | 3.9 ? -5% | 5.55 ? -50% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.06 | 4.87 20% | 10.9 -80% | 5.42 11% | 8.07 -33% | 5.92 ? 2% | 8.31 ? -37% |
* ... smaller is better
Energiförbrukning: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Energiförbrukning: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
| Oppo Reno6 5G 4300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A72 5000 mAh | OnePlus Nord 2 5G 4500 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 III 4500 mAh | Realme GT 5G 4500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 824 | 877 6% | 958 16% | 809 -2% | 755 -8% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Bra, men ingen pris/prestanda-vinnare
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Oppo Reno6 5G är en visuellt sett tilltalande smartphone som känns högkvalitativ. Mittenskikts-prestandan är okej för priset och mer än tillräcklig för vardagsbruk. Det är bara om man vill spela mycket spel på sin telefon man lär nå prestandagränsen. Den har riktigt bra batteritid och Reno6 5G är snart redo att användas igen tack vare extremt snabb laddningsförmåga.
Oppos Reno6 5G övertygar i huvudsak med sitt utseende, för prestandan får den inte direkt att stå ut från konkurrensen.
Utöver hårdvaran övertygar skärmen också med hög ljusstyrka och levande färger. Även kameran presterar bra för en mittenskiktsenhet så länge man inte behöver zoom. Vi hade gärna önskat oss IP-certifiering och minneskortsläsare, men det sistnämnda är inte helt nödvändigt då basversionen kommer med 128 GB lagring.
Tycker man om hur Oppo Reno6 5G ser ut får man en bra smartphone till ett okej pris. En del rivaler, som realme GT 5G eller OnePlus Nord 2 5G, har högre systemprestanda till lägre pris.
Oppo Reno6 5G
-
08/31/2022 v7
Mike Wobker
Pricecompare
