Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarOnePlus Nord 2 5G - Lyxig telefon till lågt pris (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85.1 % | 08/2021 | OnePlus Nord 2 5G Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9 | 189 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.43" | 2400x1080 | |
| 83.6 % | 08/2020 | OnePlus Nord SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 184 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.44" | 2440x1080 | |
| 85.4 % | 05/2021 | Motorola Moto G100 SD 870, Adreno 650 | 207 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2520x1080 | |
| 85.9 % | 05/2021 | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G SD 780G 5G, Adreno 642 | 159 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.55" | 2400x1080 | |
| 83 % | 04/2021 | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619 | 189 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G100 | |
| OnePlus Nord | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G100 | |
| OnePlus Nord | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera - FlowerMain camera - SurroundingsMain camera - Low lightWide-angle lens
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 99 %
Mitt på batteriet: 594 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
128.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.278
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43 | OnePlus Nord AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.44 | Motorola Moto G100 IPS/LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.70 | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55 | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 11% | -31% | 15% | 17% | |
| Brightness middle | 594 | 529 -11% | 562 -5% | 863 45% | 744 25% |
| Brightness | 594 | 531 -11% | 535 -10% | 860 45% | 749 26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 99 | 94 -5% | 90 -9% | 93 -6% | 98 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.57 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.74 | 2.53 8% | 3.99 -46% | 3.2 -17% | 2.2 20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6 | 4.52 25% | 9.74 -62% | 5.2 13% | 7 -17% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 1.7 60% | 6.5 -55% | 3.9 7% | 2.1 50% |
| Gamma | 2.278 97% | 2.249 98% | 2.174 101% | 2.33 94% | 2.06 107% |
| CCT | 7322 89% | 6462 101% | 6882 94% | 7299 89% | 6516 100% |
| Contrast | 986 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 119.6 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 119.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 119.6 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17909 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G | |
| OnePlus Nord | |
| Motorola Moto G100 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (534286 - 540464, n=2) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90) | |
| OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (51.1 - 51.8, n=2) | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (108.8 - 117.6, n=2) | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G100 (Chome 90) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90) | |
| OnePlus Nord (Chome 84) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (50.2 - 54.1, n=2) | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chome 92) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90) | |
| OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (69 - 70, n=2) | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (26207 - 29912, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90) | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92) | |
| OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (Chrome 89) | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (1444 - 1809, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G100 (Chrome 90) | |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G | OnePlus Nord | Motorola Moto G100 | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -52% | -7% | -28% | -39% | 11% | -2% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1827 | 956 -48% | 1730 -5% | 949 -48% | 927 -49% | 1760 ? -4% | 1505 ? -18% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 1256 | 473.1 -62% | 717 -43% | 710 -43% | 484.6 -61% | 1134 ? -10% | 1112 ? -11% |
| Random Read 4KB | 223.7 | 126.7 -43% | 253.6 13% | 207.9 -7% | 176.1 -21% | 281 ? 26% | 247 ? 10% |
| Random Write 4KB | 239 | 104.5 -56% | 252.9 6% | 206.9 -13% | 179.2 -25% | 311 ? 30% | 271 ? 13% |
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G | |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.7 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.5 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
OnePlus Nord 2 5G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus Nord audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 74.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 74.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 74.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (113.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.8 / 1.2 / 1.6 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
5.7 / 10.9 Watt |
    
| |
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G 4500 mAh | OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh | Motorola Moto G100 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G 4250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G 4500 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 1200 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -30% | -13% | -7% | 0% | -2% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.8 | 1.8 -125% | 0.9 -13% | 0.83 -4% | 0.92 -15% | 0.79 ? 1% | 0.897 ? -12% |
| Idle Average * | 1.2 | 2.1 -75% | 1.5 -25% | 1.92 -60% | 1.78 -48% | 1.53 ? -28% | 1.452 ? -21% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.6 | 2.3 -44% | 2.1 -31% | 1.97 -23% | 1.81 -13% | 1.74 ? -9% | 1.629 ? -2% |
| Load Average * | 5.7 | 3.4 40% | 6.7 -18% | 3.84 33% | 3.86 32% | 4.84 ? 15% | 5.55 ? 3% |
| Load Maximum * | 10.9 | 5.2 52% | 8.5 22% | 8.6 21% | 6.14 44% | 9.84 ? 10% | 8.31 ? 24% |
* ... smaller is better
Energiförbrukning: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Energiförbrukning: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
| OnePlus Nord 2 5G 4500 mAh | OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh | Motorola Moto G100 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G 4250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G 4500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -4% | 21% | -13% | -4% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1926 | 2003 4% | 2846 48% | 1509 -22% | 1917 0% |
| H.264 | 1126 | 1064 -6% | 1285 14% | 1248 11% | 1052 -7% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 958 | 869 -9% | 1049 9% | 734 -23% | 710 -26% |
| Load | 272 | 261 -4% | 302 11% | 223 -18% | 324 19% |
För
Emot
Omdöme – En värdig kandidat
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Vi gillade redan förra årets OnePlus Nord, som fick en poängsumma på 83%.
OnePlus har gjort ett flertal förbättringar på uppföljaren och på en del områden utmanar den till och med företagets egna dyrare telefoner: OnePlus Nord 2 5G laddar riktigt snabbt, har snabbt internet, moderna kommunikationsstandarder som 5G, höga prestandapoäng samt ett skapligt kamerasystem.
När det kommer IP-certifiering, trådlös laddning, höljets material, skärmens färgprecision samt ljudkvaliteten får man förvisso göra vissa uppoffringar jämfört med sanna toppskiktstelefoner. Men för många användare är detta små detaljer, vilket gör att OnePlus Nord 2 5G ser riktigt bra ut även jämfört med betydligt dyrare telefoner.
OnePlus Nord 2 5G är även den här gången en riktig flaggskeppsdödare. Den kanske inte kan hålla jämna steg med de dyraste modellerna på alla områden, men den har många riktigt bra funktioner till ett lågt pris.
Om du med andra ord inte behöver det bästa av det bästa och kan tänka dig att istället kompromissa lite får du en riktigt bra smartphone för strax under 4 000 kronor.
Däremot håller konkurrenterna också hög kvalitet: Motorola Moto G100, har till exempel en desktop-docka, och Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G har också hög prestanda och en ljusstark skärm.
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
-
08/31/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt
Pricecompare
