Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Medion LifeTab E10802 - Aldis surfplatta kommer med tangentbord och LTE (Sammanfattning)

Produktivitetsmirakel? Medion LifeTab E10802 är en surfplatta på 10 tum med ett tangentbordsöverdrag och stöd för att komma åt internet i farten. Aldis erbjudande inkluderar också ett SIM-kort med 100 kronor på. Allt detta för under 2.000 kronor. Vårt test kommer visa var man har behövt spara in.
Medion LifeTab E10802 (Lifetab Serie)
Processor
Mediatek MT8768 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafikkort
Minne
3 GB 
Skärm
10.00 tum 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixlar 226 PPI, Kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 55.21 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: Ljudanslutning (3.5 mm), USB-C, Kortläsare: microSD (FAT, FAT32), Sensorer: Accelerometer, Pogo-PINs
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G, 3G (Band 1, 8), LTE Cat. 4 (Band 3, 7, 20), LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.6 x 247 x 171
Batteri
22.8 Wh, 6000 mAh Litiumjon, 3.8 V, Sunwoda Electronic
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Webbkamera: 5 MPix (f/2.2), Camera2-API: Limited
Övrigt
Högtalare: Dual, Tangentbord: Virtuellt + Tangentbord, Tangentbordsdocka, Laddare på 10W, USB-kabel, Aldi Talk Starter Set, 36 Månader Garanti, Single-Band-GNSS: GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, fanless
Vikt
503 g, Strömförsörjning: 85 g
Pris
199 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
78.4 %
12/2020
Medion LifeTab E10802
Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320
503 g8.6 mm10.00"1920x1200
76.8 %
03/2019
Lenovo Tab M10
SD 450, Adreno 506
480 g8.1 mm10.10"1920x1200
80.7 %
06/2019
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2
460 g7.5 mm10.10"1920x1200
88 %
10/2020
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU
495 g7.5 mm10.20"2160x1620

Storleksjämförelse

250.6 mm 174.1 mm 7.5 mm 495 g247 mm 171 mm 8.6 mm 503 g245.2 mm 149.4 mm 7.5 mm 460 g242 mm 168 mm 8.1 mm 480 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
459 (223min - 497max) MBit/s +40%
Medion LifeTab E10802
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash
329 (99min - 384max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 32 GB eMMC Flash
290 (274min - 309max) MBit/s -12%
Lenovo Tab M10
Adreno 506, SD 450, 16 GB eMMC Flash
284 (246min - 313max) MBit/s -14%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
342 (291min - 400max) MBit/s +8%
Medion LifeTab E10802
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 64 GB eMMC Flash
317 (164min - 333max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7904, 32 GB eMMC Flash
298 (239min - 314max) MBit/s -6%
Lenovo Tab M10
Adreno 506, SD 450, 16 GB eMMC Flash
207 (98min - 220max) MBit/s -35%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Medion LifeTab E10802; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø308 (164-333)
Medion LifeTab E10802; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø324 (99-384)
Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 500 - Sjö
Garmin Edge 500 - Sjö
Garmin Edge 500 - Vägskäl
Garmin Edge 500 - Vägskäl
Medion LifeTab E10802 - Översikt
Medion LifeTab E10802 - Översikt
Medion LifeTab E10802 - Sjö
Medion LifeTab E10802 - Sjö
Medion LifeTab E10802 - Vägskäl
Medion LifeTab E10802 - Vägskäl
327
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 341 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 319.4 cd/m² Minimum: 12.06 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 335 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1155:1 (Svärta: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.97
ΔE Greyscale 10 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
94.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.44
Medion LifeTab E10802
IPS, 1920x1200, 10"
Lenovo Tab M10
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
IPS, 2160x1620, 10.2"
Screen
-2%
15%
25%
Brightness middle
335
339
1%
401
20%
477
42%
Brightness
319
327
3%
396
24%
452
42%
Brightness Distribution
85
86
1%
86
1%
86
1%
Black Level *
0.29
0.42
-45%
0.5
-72%
0.5
-72%
Contrast
1155
807
-30%
802
-31%
954
-17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.6
5.8
24%
2.9
62%
2.2
71%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
14.1
11.6
18%
5.8
59%
5
65%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
10
8.6
14%
4.1
59%
3.3
67%
Gamma
2.44 90%
2.16 102%
2.36 93%
2.23 99%
CCT
10228 64%
8718 75%
7263 89%
7019 93%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17490 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
43.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.4 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
71.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.4 ms).
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
1116 Points +606%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=75, last 2 years)
683 Points +332%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
239 Points +51%
Medion LifeTab E10802
158 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (135 - 179, n=4)
156 Points -1%
Huawei MatePad T8
135 Points -15%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
2772 Points +239%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=75, last 2 years)
2429 Points +197%
Medion LifeTab E10802
817 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (498 - 1003, n=4)
775 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
596 Points -27%
Huawei MatePad T8
498 Points -39%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score
Huawei MatePad T8
6694 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
6456 Points +14%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (5647 - 6694, n=2)
6171 Points +9%
Medion LifeTab E10802
5647 Points
Lenovo Tab M10
4836 Points -14%
Work 2.0 performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5452 Points +20%
Huawei MatePad T8
4964 Points +9%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (4536 - 4964, n=2)
4750 Points +5%
Medion LifeTab E10802
4536 Points
Lenovo Tab M10
4238 Points -7%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13608 Points +15%
Lenovo Tab M10
12726 Points +7%
Huawei MatePad T8
12265 Points +3%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (11849 - 12265, n=3)
11993 Points +1%
Medion LifeTab E10802
11864 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13794 Points +15%
Lenovo Tab M10
12386 Points +3%
Huawei MatePad T8
12210 Points +2%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (11994 - 12210, n=3)
12081 Points +1%
Medion LifeTab E10802
11994 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab M10
14076 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
12994 Points +14%
Huawei MatePad T8
12969 Points +13%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (11228 - 12969, n=3)
11876 Points +4%
Medion LifeTab E10802
11431 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
6636 Points +835%
Average of class Tablet (507 - 8472, n=22, last 2 years)
2843 Points +300%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
814 Points +15%
Lenovo Tab M10
804 Points +13%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (687 - 880, n=4)
744 Points +5%
Medion LifeTab E10802
710 Points
Huawei MatePad T8
687 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
10023 Points +1430%
Average of class Tablet (454 - 10759, n=22, last 2 years)
2961 Points +352%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
708 Points +8%
Lenovo Tab M10
694 Points +6%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (602 - 801, n=4)
672 Points +3%
Medion LifeTab E10802
655 Points
Huawei MatePad T8
602 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
3040 Points +201%
Average of class Tablet (863 - 4858, n=22, last 2 years)
2920 Points +189%
Lenovo Tab M10
1816 Points +80%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1702 Points +69%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (1009 - 1346, n=4)
1148 Points +14%
Huawei MatePad T8
1102 Points +9%
Medion LifeTab E10802
1009 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (539 - 17675, n=33, last 2 years)
5632 Points +627%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
930 Points +20%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (775 - 952, n=4)
843 Points +9%
Lenovo Tab M10
822 Points +6%
Huawei MatePad T8
809 Points +4%
Medion LifeTab E10802
775 Points
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (485 - 35165, n=33, last 2 years)
8225 Points +1022%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
822 Points +12%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (733 - 881, n=4)
788 Points +8%
Huawei MatePad T8
765 Points +4%
Medion LifeTab E10802
733 Points
Lenovo Tab M10
712 Points -3%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (463 - 6449, n=33, last 2 years)
3651 Points +277%
Lenovo Tab M10
1782 Points +84%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1716 Points +77%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (969 - 1328, n=4)
1146 Points +18%
Huawei MatePad T8
1136 Points +17%
Medion LifeTab E10802
969 Points
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
Points -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
4472 Points +1018%
Average of class Tablet (361 - 14235, n=55, last 2 years)
2024 Points +406%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
639 Points +60%
Huawei MatePad T8
471 Points +18%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (400 - 503, n=4)
446 Points +12%
Lenovo Tab M10
442 Points +11%
Medion LifeTab E10802
400 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
5053 Points +1382%
Average of class Tablet (290 - 24605, n=55, last 2 years)
2113 Points +520%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
542 Points +59%
Huawei MatePad T8
403 Points +18%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (341 - 427, n=4)
380 Points +11%
Lenovo Tab M10
363 Points +6%
Medion LifeTab E10802
341 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
3189 Points +213%
Average of class Tablet (858 - 5751, n=55, last 2 years)
2827 Points +178%
Lenovo Tab M10
1818 Points +79%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1704 Points +67%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (1018 - 1333, n=4)
1152 Points +13%
Huawei MatePad T8
1126 Points +11%
Medion LifeTab E10802
1018 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
5049 Points +1010%
Average of class Tablet (267 - 14235, n=66, last 2 years)
3285 Points +622%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
646 Points +42%
Huawei MatePad T8
581 Points +28%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (455 - 581, n=4)
521 Points +15%
Lenovo Tab M10
498 Points +9%
Medion LifeTab E10802
455 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
6175 Points +1459%
Average of class Tablet (240 - 24605, n=66, last 2 years)
3928 Points +892%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
547 Points +38%
Huawei MatePad T8
487 Points +23%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (396 - 487, n=4)
446 Points +13%
Lenovo Tab M10
413 Points +4%
Medion LifeTab E10802
396 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (441 - 5751, n=66, last 2 years)
3280 Points +243%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
3082 Points +222%
Huawei MatePad T8
2101 Points +120%
Lenovo Tab M10
1785 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1755 Points +83%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (957 - 2101, n=4)
1390 Points +45%
Medion LifeTab E10802
957 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (14 - 144, n=68, last 2 years)
62.7 fps +230%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
60 fps +216%
Huawei MatePad T8
30 fps +58%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (19 - 31, n=3)
26.7 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
24 fps +26%
Lenovo Tab M10
20 fps +5%
Medion LifeTab E10802
19 fps
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
239 fps +1158%
Average of class Tablet (15 - 873, n=68, last 2 years)
171.3 fps +802%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
25 fps +32%
Lenovo Tab M10
22 fps +16%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (19 - 22, n=3)
20.3 fps +7%
Huawei MatePad T8
20 fps +5%
Medion LifeTab E10802
19 fps
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
58 fps +480%
Average of class Tablet (8.1 - 122, n=68, last 2 years)
50.4 fps +404%
Huawei MatePad T8
19 fps +90%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (10 - 19, n=3)
15 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13 fps +30%
Medion LifeTab E10802
10 fps
Lenovo Tab M10
8.8 fps -12%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
131 fps +1091%
Average of class Tablet (7.3 - 530, n=68, last 2 years)
106.9 fps +872%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
13 fps +18%
Medion LifeTab E10802
11 fps
Average Mediatek MT8768 (10 - 12, n=3)
11 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad T8
10 fps -9%
Lenovo Tab M10
9.2 fps -16%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
49.51 fps +607%
Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 120, n=68, last 2 years)
37.9 fps +441%
Huawei MatePad T8
13 fps +86%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (7 - 13, n=3)
11 fps +57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
7.7 fps +10%
Medion LifeTab E10802
7 fps
Lenovo Tab M10
5.7 fps -19%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
85.8 fps +1143%
Average of class Tablet (5 - 400, n=68, last 2 years)
74.3 fps +977%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
8.1 fps +17%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (6.9 - 8.3, n=3)
7.43 fps +8%
Huawei MatePad T8
7.1 fps +3%
Medion LifeTab E10802
6.9 fps
Lenovo Tab M10
6 fps -13%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
31.72 fps +861%
Average of class Tablet (3.1 - 117.9, n=67, last 2 years)
24.4 fps +639%
Huawei MatePad T8
5.3 fps +61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5 fps +52%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (3.3 - 5.3, n=3)
4.53 fps +37%
Lenovo Tab M10
3.3 fps 0%
Medion LifeTab E10802
3.3 fps
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
51.3 fps +1610%
Average of class Tablet (2.2 - 284, n=67, last 2 years)
45.1 fps +1403%
Huawei MatePad T8
6.1 fps +103%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5.2 fps +73%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (3 - 6.1, n=3)
4.03 fps +34%
Lenovo Tab M10
3.4 fps +13%
Medion LifeTab E10802
3 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
25.34 fps +1002%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 106.4, n=81, last 2 years)
17.7 fps +670%
Huawei MatePad T8
4.6 fps +100%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (2.2 - 5.2, n=4)
3.58 fps +56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
3 fps +30%
Medion LifeTab E10802
2.3 fps
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
23.09 fps +1549%
Average of class Tablet (0.9 - 114.5, n=81, last 2 years)
18.5 fps +1221%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1.8 fps +29%
Huawei MatePad T8
1.5 fps +7%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (1.4 - 1.5, n=4)
1.45 fps +4%
Medion LifeTab E10802
1.4 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
37.01 fps +900%
Average of class Tablet (3 - 120, n=81, last 2 years)
25.1 fps +578%
Huawei MatePad T8
7.6 fps +105%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (3.6 - 8.2, n=4)
5.78 fps +56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
4.9 fps +32%
Medion LifeTab E10802
3.7 fps
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
62.4 fps +1500%
Average of class Tablet (2.5 - 340, n=81, last 2 years)
50 fps +1182%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
5 fps +28%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (3.9 - 4.2, n=4)
3.98 fps +2%
Huawei MatePad T8
3.9 fps 0%
Medion LifeTab E10802
3.9 fps
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
411764 Points +359%
Huawei MatePad T8
91467 Points +2%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (89714 - 91467, n=2)
90591 Points +1%
Medion LifeTab E10802
89714 Points
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Tablet (4468 - 6182, n=4, last 2 years)
5142 Points +19%
Medion LifeTab E10802
4333 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 ()
4333 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
4306 Points -1%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=57, last 2 years)
3670 Points +210%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1681 Points +42%
Huawei MatePad T8
1269 Points +7%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (1185 - 1269, n=3)
1226 Points +3%
Medion LifeTab E10802
1185 Points
Lenovo Tab M10
1138 Points -4%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=57, last 2 years)
6630 Points +159%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
3517 Points +37%
Lenovo Tab M10
2845 Points +11%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (2564 - 2653, n=3)
2605 Points +2%
Huawei MatePad T8
2598 Points +1%
Medion LifeTab E10802
2564 Points
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10049, n=57, last 2 years)
4369 Points +301%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
2079 Points +91%
Huawei MatePad T8
1365 Points +25%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (1046 - 1365, n=3)
1167 Points +7%
Medion LifeTab E10802
1089 Points
Lenovo Tab M10
846 Points -22%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=57, last 2 years)
6639 Points +662%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1073 Points +23%
Lenovo Tab M10
949 Points +9%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (871 - 1014, n=3)
928 Points +7%
Huawei MatePad T8
898 Points +3%
Medion LifeTab E10802
871 Points
Web
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=57, last 2 years)
1218 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
1016 Points +25%
Medion LifeTab E10802
810 Points
Average Mediatek MT8768 (762 - 810, n=3)
790 Points -2%
Huawei MatePad T8
762 Points -6%
Lenovo Tab M10
735 Points -9%

Legend

 
Medion LifeTab E10802 Mediatek MT8768, PowerVR GE8320, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 Samsung Exynos 7904, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 128 GB NVMe
 
Huawei MatePad T8 Mediatek MT8768, PowerVR GE8320, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
266.8 Points +1108%
Average of class Tablet (64.6 - 135.7, n=4, last 2 years)
92.4 Points +318%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
43.13 Points +95%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
22.97 Points +4%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (22.1 - 23, n=2)
22.5 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
22.22 Points +1%
Medion LifeTab E10802 (Chrome 87)
22.08 Points
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
166 Points +592%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=51, last 2 years)
144.5 Points +502%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
56 Points +133%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
34 Points +42%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (24 - 39, n=4)
31.8 Points +33%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
31 Points +29%
Medion LifeTab E10802 (Chrome 87)
24 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
41443 Points +918%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
26881 Points +560%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
8696 Points +114%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (4070 - 6281, n=3)
4855 Points +19%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
4215 Points +4%
Medion LifeTab E10802 (Chrome 87)
4070 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
3990 Points -2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Medion LifeTab E10802 (Chrome 87)
12342 ms *
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
11448 ms * +7%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
11258 ms * +9%
Average Mediatek MT8768 (10163 - 12342, n=4)
11131 ms * +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
4055 ms * +67%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=72, last 2 years)
3564 ms * +71%
Apple iPad 10.2 2020 (Safari Mobile 14)
653 ms * +95%

* ... smaller is better

Medion LifeTab E10802Lenovo Tab M10Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019Huawei MatePad T8Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
10%
24%
21%
65%
669%
Sequential Read 256KB
274.7
279.9
2%
300
9%
274.1
0%
Sequential Write 256KB
101.2
52.6
-48%
90.7
-10%
67.4
-33%
176.2 ?(40 - 274, n=203)
74%
Random Read 4KB
27.36
52.5
92%
62.6
129%
57.5
110%
Random Write 4KB
10.32
11.32
10%
11.37
10%
14.63
42%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
80.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
81.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
82.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
65.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
62.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
Hög belastning
 25.7 °C24.1 °C27.9 °C 
 26.7 °C25.1 °C30.6 °C 
 26 °C23.7 °C32.7 °C 
Max: 32.7 °C
Medel: 26.9 °C
25.8 °C24.1 °C28.1 °C
26.7 °C24.3 °C27.6 °C
26.3 °C24.4 °C25.4 °C
Max: 28.1 °C
Medel: 25.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  36.1 °C | Rumstemperatur 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203840.72528.9393123.836.84025.343.9503941.36323.440.88019.341.210016.144.212510.546.816015.349.42001551.32509.648.931512.450.140010.157.550011.466.56301173.280014.574.5100010.975.2125013.576.7160010.877.9200011.475.925001278.3315012.57840001378.6500013.181630013.682.2800013.487.71000013.584.61250013.9801600014.772.7SPL24.892.1N0.689.7median 13median 75.9Delta1.61038.924.330.93226.32827.326.433.130.926.322.224.224.924.43618.14422.552.518.55117.557.714.766.115.266.314.670.11574.213.473.814.370.713.868.813.568.613.772.113.575.114.276.613.971.914.676.414.976.114.978.714.775.214.765.4155326.686.20.869.5median 14.7median 70.11.18.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMedion LifeTab E10802Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Medion LifeTab E10802 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.11 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.25 / 3.79 / 3.82 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.99 / 6.33 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Medion LifeTab E10802
6000 mAh
Lenovo Tab M10
4850 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
6150 mAh
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
8827 mAh
Power Consumption
-8%
-31%
-73%
Idle Minimum *
1.25
0.98
22%
1.66
-33%
2.12
-70%
Idle Average *
3.79
4.45
-17%
4.28
-13%
6.43
-70%
Idle Maximum *
3.82
4.51
-18%
4.44
-16%
6.69
-75%
Load Average *
4.99
5.78
-16%
7.53
-51%
8.17
-64%
Load Maximum *
6.33
7.18
-13%
9.09
-44%
11.84
-87%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 87)
12tim 10min
Medion LifeTab E10802
6000 mAh
Lenovo Tab M10
4850 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
6150 mAh
Apple iPad 10.2 2020
8827 mAh
Battery Runtime
-21%
-1%
7%
WiFi v1.3
730
580
-21%
723
-1%
782
7%
Reader / Idle
1290
1500
2241
H.264
596
838
934
Load
240
347
238

För

+ Bra minneskonfiguration som inkluderar möjlighet till utökning
+ Tangentbord ingår
+ 3 års garanti

Emot

- Lågfrekvens-mjukvara
- Saknar stöd för exFAT
- Endast DRM Widevine L3

Omdöme - LifeTab till reapris

Recension av Medion LifeTab E10802 (MD 60364). Recensionsex från Medion Germany.
Recension av Medion LifeTab E10802 (MD 60364). Recensionsex från Medion Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Medion LifeTab E10802 är definitivt inte utan brister, men den erbjuder en totalt sett sammanhängande upplevelse. Skärmen är tillräckligt ljusstark för inomhusbruk och har hög pixeldensitet. Högtalarna gör ett skapligt jobb och den framåtriktade kameran räcker utan problem för videosamtal.

Den som letar efter en mångsidig surfplatta som också fungerar till kontorsarbete som ordbehandling, epost eller liknande kommer troligen få nytta av LifeTab, särskilt med tanke på det tilltalande tangentbordet. 

Med sin LifeTab E10802 erbjuder Medion ett totalt sett sammanhängande och komplett paket med ett lockande pris/prestanda-förhållande.

Plattan klarar också av mediauppspelning, men det är inte dess fokus. Motsvarande DRM-certifiering saknas helt enkelt och skärmens färgåtergivning är inte optimal. Vi tänker oss snarare detta som ett PC-alternativ för nybörjare eller för personer som bara tänker använda den då och då. Den kan också vara ett fint val för studenter tack vare bra batteritid och lågt pris.

Medion LifeTab E10802 - 12/22/2020 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Design
75 / 98 → 77%
Tangentbord
71 / 80 → 89%
Mus
84%
Anslutningar
41 / 70 → 58%
Vikt
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Batteri
89%
Skärm
78%
Spelprestanda
6 / 78 → 7%
Programprestanda
42 / 92 → 45%
Temperatur
95%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
80 / 91 → 88%
Camera
38 / 85 → 44%
Medel
68%
78%
Tablet - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Medion LifeTab E10802 - Aldis surfplatta kommer med tangentbord och LTE (Sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-12-31 (Update: 2020-12-31)