Notebookcheck

Test: Huawei MatePad T8 - Är surfplattan för 1.000 kronor värd pengarna? (Sammanfattning)

Har Huawei missat att vi lever i 2020 nu? Huawei MatePad T8 är en platta för under 1.000 kronor. Således fick man kompromissa en del med hårdvaran. Om man bara tittar på specifikationerna för MatePad T8 är det lätt att tro att det rör sig om en surfplatta från 2017 snarare än en från 2020.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (översatt av Daniel Eriksson),
Huawei MatePad T8 (MatePad Serie)
Processor
Mediatek MT8768 8 x 1.5 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A53, Mediatek MT8768
Grafikkort
PowerVR GE8320
Minne
2048 MB 
Skärm
8 tum 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixlar 189 PPI, Tryckkänslig, Kapacitiv, LCD, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.7 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning, Kortläsare: Minneskort (microSD) upp till 512 GB, Sensorer: Rörelsesensor, OTG, Status-LED
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, LTE FDD: B1 / B3 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B26 / B28, TD-LTE: B38 / B40 / B41, UMTS: B1 / B2 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19, GSM: B2 / B3 / B5 / B8, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.55 x 199.7 x 121.1
Batteri
5100 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2 bländare, Camera2 API: Fullständigt
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix f/2.4 bländare
Övrigt
Högtalare: Mono, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare, microUSB-kabel, Snabbstartsguide, Garanti-information, EMUI 10, 24 Månader Garanti, Widevine L3, fanless
Vikt
310 g, Strömförsörjning: 43 g
Pris
119 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81 %
09/2020
Huawei MatePad T8
Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320
310 g8.55 mm8"1280x800
81 %
07/2020
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
MT8168, Mali-G52 MP2
355 g9.7 mm8"1280x800
81 %
06/2020
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
MT8168, Mali-G52 MP2
355 g9.7 mm8"1280x800
81 %
03/2020
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320
305 g8.2 mm8"1280x800
80 %
01/2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
SD 429, Adreno 504
345 g8 mm8"1280x800

Storleksjämförelse

210 mm 124.4 mm 8 mm 345 g202 mm 137 mm 9.7 mm 355 g202 mm 137 mm 9.7 mm 355 g199.7 mm 121.1 mm 8.55 mm 310 g199 mm 129 mm 8.2 mm 305 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MatePad T8
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 16 GB eMMC Flash
347 (311min - 360max) MBit/s ∼100%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8168, 32 GB eMMC Flash
330 (313min - 336max) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8168, 32 GB eMMC Flash
330 (313min - 336max) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
294 (256min - 307max) MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Adreno 504, SD 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash
101 (86min - 107max) MBit/s ∼29% -71%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MatePad T8
PowerVR GE8320, Helio MT8768, 16 GB eMMC Flash
350 (174min - 394max) MBit/s ∼100%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8168, 32 GB eMMC Flash
348 (175min - 353max) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8168, 32 GB eMMC Flash
348 (175min - 353max) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
271 (183min - 335max) MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Adreno 504, SD 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash
115 (109min - 121max) MBit/s ∼33% -67%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø345 (311-360)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø344 (174-394)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Huawei MatePad T8
GPS Huawei MatePad T8
GPS Huawei MatePad T8
GPS Huawei MatePad T8
GPS Huawei MatePad T8
GPS Huawei MatePad T8
5MP Kamera
5MP Kamera
4X Zoom (max)
4X Zoom (max)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleLow-light photography4X zoomWide-angle
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
61.9 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
28 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
76.3 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
93 ∆E
71 ∆E
52 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad T8: 46.61 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 92.97 ∆E
ColorChecker
6.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
0.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MatePad T8: 5.33 ∆E min: 0.9 - max: 11.74 ∆E
314
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 343 cd/m² Medel: 325.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.75 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 331 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2069:1 (Svärta: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6
85.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.31
Huawei MatePad T8
LCD, 1280x800, 8
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
TFT, 1280x800, 8
Screen
10%
12%
-7%
-33%
Brightness middle
331
490
48%
501
51%
379
15%
377
14%
Brightness
326
447
37%
463
42%
346
6%
372
14%
Brightness Distribution
92
88
-4%
85
-8%
88
-4%
87
-5%
Black Level *
0.16
0.23
-44%
0.25
-56%
0.21
-31%
0.29
-81%
Contrast
2069
2130
3%
2004
-3%
1805
-13%
1300
-37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.1
4
2%
3.6
12%
3.8
7%
6.1
-49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.2
8.3
-15%
8.4
-17%
7.5
-4%
10.9
-51%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.9
2
49%
1
74%
5
-28%
6.6
-69%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.29 96%
2.17 101%
2.23 99%
2.13 103%
CCT
7355 88%
6618 98%
6473 100%
7514 87%
7861 83%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17520 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 12.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1
Average of class Tablet (623 - 4654, n=4)
2438 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Points ∼0%
OpenCL Score 5.1
Average of class Tablet (138 - 5353, n=5)
2292 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
138 Points ∼0%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (498 - 4712, n=21)
1979 Points ∼16% +297%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
566 Points ∼5% +14%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
500 Points ∼4% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
499 Points ∼4% 0%
Huawei MatePad T8
498 Points ∼4%
Average Mediatek MT8768
498 Points ∼4% 0%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (135 - 1127, n=21)
590 Points ∼36% +337%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
168 Points ∼10% +24%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
144 Points ∼9% +7%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
141 Points ∼9% +4%
Huawei MatePad T8
135 Points ∼8%
Average Mediatek MT8768
135 Points ∼8% 0%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score
Average of class Tablet (840 - 43802, n=45)
5745 Points ∼13% +104%
Huawei MatePad T8
2814 Points ∼6%
Average Mediatek MT8768
2814 Points ∼6% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1733 Points ∼4% -38%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=62)
4764 Points ∼8% +27%
Huawei MatePad T8
3745 Points ∼6%
Average Mediatek MT8768
3745 Points ∼6% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
2476 Points ∼4% -34%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=62)
1670 Points ∼25% +112%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
833 Points ∼12% +6%
Huawei MatePad T8
789 Points ∼12%
Average Mediatek MT8768
789 Points ∼12% 0%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Huawei MatePad T8
4964 Points ∼32%
Average Mediatek MT8768
4964 Points ∼32% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4946 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 12603, n=60)
4914 Points ∼32% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
4509 Points ∼29% -9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4454 Points ∼29% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
4267 Points ∼28% -14%
Work performance score
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
7019 Points ∼35% +5%
Huawei MatePad T8
6694 Points ∼33%
Average Mediatek MT8768
6694 Points ∼33% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5986 Points ∼30% -11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
5667 Points ∼28% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
5620 Points ∼28% -16%
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 14982, n=96)
5329 Points ∼27% -20%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (1152 - 3658, n=20)
2346 Points ∼58% +104%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1833 Points ∼45% +59%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1823 Points ∼45% +58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1786 Points ∼44% +55%
Huawei MatePad T8
1152 Points ∼28%
Average Mediatek MT8768
1152 Points ∼28% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (400 - 8768, n=20)
2120 Points ∼23% +427%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
607 Points ∼7% +51%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
606 Points ∼7% +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
460 Points ∼5% +14%
Huawei MatePad T8
402 Points ∼4%
Average Mediatek MT8768
402 Points ∼4% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (469 - 6292, n=20)
1904 Points ∼27% +306%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
713 Points ∼10% +52%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
712 Points ∼10% +52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
550 Points ∼8% +17%
Huawei MatePad T8
469 Points ∼7%
Average Mediatek MT8768
469 Points ∼7% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points ∼0% -100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad T8
2101 Points ∼26%
Average Mediatek MT8768
2101 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Tablet (650 - 4756, n=61)
1950 Points ∼24% -7%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1277 Points ∼16% -39%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1265 Points ∼16% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1155 Points ∼14% -45%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
939 Points ∼12% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (99 - 9893, n=61)
2021 Points ∼20% +315%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
563 Points ∼6% +16%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
562 Points ∼6% +15%
Huawei MatePad T8
487 Points ∼5%
Average Mediatek MT8768
487 Points ∼5% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
253 Points ∼3% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
210 Points ∼2% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (129 - 7701, n=61)
1787 Points ∼21% +208%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
643 Points ∼8% +11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
641 Points ∼8% +10%
Huawei MatePad T8
581 Points ∼7%
Average Mediatek MT8768
581 Points ∼7% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
302 Points ∼4% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
257 Points ∼3% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4702, n=67)
1823 Points ∼32% +60%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1280 Points ∼22% +13%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1268 Points ∼22% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1145 Points ∼20% +1%
Huawei MatePad T8
1136 Points ∼20%
Average Mediatek MT8768
1136 Points ∼20% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
943 Points ∼16% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=67)
3186 Points ∼11% +316%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
893 Points ∼3% +17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
892 Points ∼3% +17%
Huawei MatePad T8
765 Points ∼3%
Average Mediatek MT8768
765 Points ∼3% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
458 Points ∼2% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
336 Points ∼1% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=67)
2237 Points ∼17% +177%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
956 Points ∼7% +18%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
956 Points ∼7% +18%
Huawei MatePad T8
809 Points ∼6%
Average Mediatek MT8768
809 Points ∼6% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
517 Points ∼4% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
428 Points ∼3% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average of class Tablet (729 - 4201, n=77)
1832 Points ∼35% +63%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1243 Points ∼24% +10%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1233 Points ∼24% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1188 Points ∼23% +6%
Huawei MatePad T8
1126 Points ∼22%
Average Mediatek MT8768
1126 Points ∼22% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
903 Points ∼17% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Tablet (55 - 8894, n=77)
1603 Points ∼17% +298%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
573 Points ∼6% +42%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
570 Points ∼6% +41%
Huawei MatePad T8
403 Points ∼4%
Average Mediatek MT8768
403 Points ∼4% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
233 Points ∼3% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
153 Points ∼2% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Tablet (70 - 7098, n=79)
1481 Points ∼7% +214%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
651 Points ∼3% +38%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
647 Points ∼3% +37%
Huawei MatePad T8
471 Points ∼2%
Average Mediatek MT8768
471 Points ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
279 Points ∼1% -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
190 Points ∼1% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Average of class Tablet (56 - 4482, n=80)
1716 Points ∼33% +56%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1228 Points ∼23% +11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1228 Points ∼23% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1178 Points ∼22% +7%
Huawei MatePad T8
1102 Points ∼21%
Average Mediatek MT8768
1102 Points ∼21% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
903 Points ∼17% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Tablet (42 - 14283, n=80)
2291 Points ∼16% +281%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
901 Points ∼6% +50%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
898 Points ∼6% +49%
Huawei MatePad T8
602 Points ∼4%
Average Mediatek MT8768
602 Points ∼4% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
427 Points ∼3% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
364 Points ∼3% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average of class Tablet (53 - 9238, n=81)
1838 Points ∼19% +168%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
958 Points ∼10% +39%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
955 Points ∼10% +39%
Huawei MatePad T8
687 Points ∼7%
Average Mediatek MT8768
687 Points ∼7% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
484 Points ∼5% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
428 Points ∼4% -38%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
15709 Points ∼18% +21%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
15151 Points ∼18% +17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
14979 Points ∼17% +15%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
14822 Points ∼17% +14%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51436, n=174)
14462 Points ∼17% +12%
Huawei MatePad T8
12969 Points ∼15%
Average Mediatek MT8768
12969 Points ∼15% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 221941, n=174)
25191 Points ∼5% +106%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
13426 Points ∼2% +10%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
13333 Points ∼2% +9%
Huawei MatePad T8
12210 Points ∼2%
Average Mediatek MT8768
12210 Points ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
7658 Points ∼1% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
6897 Points ∼1% -44%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 110846, n=175)
18873 Points ∼8% +54%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
13743 Points ∼6% +12%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
13698 Points ∼6% +12%
Huawei MatePad T8
12265 Points ∼5%
Average Mediatek MT8768
12265 Points ∼5% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
8580 Points ∼3% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
7879 Points ∼3% -36%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=196)
37.1 fps ∼0% +86%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
21 fps ∼0% +5%
Huawei MatePad T8
20 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek MT8768
20 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
14 fps ∼0% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
11 fps ∼0% -45%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
33 fps ∼1% +10%
Huawei MatePad T8
30 fps ∼1%
Average Mediatek MT8768
30 fps ∼1% 0%
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=200)
23.9 fps ∼1% -20%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
21 fps ∼1% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
17 fps ∼1% -43%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=130)
25.3 fps ∼4% +153%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
12 fps ∼2% +20%
Huawei MatePad T8
10 fps ∼2%
Average Mediatek MT8768
10 fps ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
6.6 fps ∼1% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
4.8 fps ∼1% -52%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
24 fps ∼7% +26%
Huawei MatePad T8
19 fps ∼5%
Average Mediatek MT8768
19 fps ∼5% 0%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=136)
17.5 fps ∼5% -8%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
12 fps ∼3% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
9.5 fps ∼3% -50%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=82)
22.7 fps ∼0% +220%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
7.6 fps ∼0% +7%
Huawei MatePad T8
7.1 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek MT8768
7.1 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4.3 fps ∼0% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.2 fps ∼0% -55%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
17 fps ∼0% +31%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=82)
15.1 fps ∼0% +16%
Huawei MatePad T8
13 fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek MT8768
13 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
8.5 fps ∼0% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
6.9 fps ∼0% -47%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 49, n=32)
10.3 fps ∼7% +124%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
5.5 fps ∼4% +20%
Huawei MatePad T8
4.6 fps ∼3%
Average Mediatek MT8768
4.6 fps ∼3% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
2.9 fps ∼2% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
2 fps ∼1% -57%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.8 - 51.1, n=32)
9.95 fps ∼4% +563%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1.8 fps ∼1% +20%
Huawei MatePad T8
1.5 fps ∼1%
Average Mediatek MT8768
1.5 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
0.85 fps ∼0% -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
0.8 fps ∼0% -47%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 58, n=32)
15.5 fps ∼8% +104%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
9.7 fps ∼5% +28%
Huawei MatePad T8
7.6 fps ∼4%
Average Mediatek MT8768
7.6 fps ∼4% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
4.6 fps ∼2% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.1 fps ∼2% -59%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 134, n=32)
26.6 fps ∼5% +582%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
5.1 fps ∼1% +31%
Huawei MatePad T8
3.9 fps ∼1%
Average Mediatek MT8768
3.9 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
2.3 fps ∼0% -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1.7 fps ∼0% -56%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 107, n=58)
16.3 fps ∼4% +167%
Huawei MatePad T8
6.1 fps ∼1%
Average Mediatek MT8768
6.1 fps ∼1% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4.8 fps ∼1% -21%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1.9 fps ∼0% -69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1.8 fps ∼0% -70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 47, n=58)
10.2 fps ∼4% +92%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
9.2 fps ∼3% +74%
Huawei MatePad T8
5.3 fps ∼2%
Average Mediatek MT8768
5.3 fps ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
3.8 fps ∼1% -28%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
3.6 fps ∼1% -32%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (78450 - 751846, n=16)
324526 Points ∼43% +255%
Huawei MatePad T8
91467 Points ∼12%
Average Mediatek MT8768
91467 Points ∼12% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
90442 Points ∼12% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
90422 Points ∼12% -1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
79125 Points ∼11% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
78450 Points ∼10% -14%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
809 Points ∼40% +6%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=123)
772 Points ∼38% +1%
Huawei MatePad T8
762 Points ∼37%
Average Mediatek MT8768
762 Points ∼37% 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
756 Points ∼37% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
731 Points ∼36% -4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
730 Points ∼36% -4%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=124)
2440 Points ∼8% +172%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
947 Points ∼3% +5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
946 Points ∼3% +5%
Huawei MatePad T8
898 Points ∼3%
Average Mediatek MT8768
898 Points ∼3% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
487 Points ∼2% -46%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
472 Points ∼2% -47%
Memory
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1416 Points ∼16% +4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1406 Points ∼16% +3%
Huawei MatePad T8
1365 Points ∼15%
Average Mediatek MT8768
1365 Points ∼15% 0%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 6751, n=124)
1304 Points ∼15% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1258 Points ∼14% -8%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1151 Points ∼13% -16%
System
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=124)
2712 Points ∼16% +4%
Huawei MatePad T8
2598 Points ∼16%
Average Mediatek MT8768
2598 Points ∼16% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1945 Points ∼12% -25%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1802 Points ∼11% -31%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1788 Points ∼11% -31%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
1539 Points ∼9% -41%
Overall
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=123)
1426 Points ∼17% +12%
Huawei MatePad T8
1269 Points ∼15%
Average Mediatek MT8768
1269 Points ∼15% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
1150 Points ∼14% -9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
1150 Points ∼14% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
987 Points ∼12% -22%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
891 Points ∼11% -30%

Legend

 
Huawei MatePad T8 Mediatek MT8768, PowerVR GE8320, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 MediaTek MT8168, ARM Mali-G52 MP1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 MediaTek MT8168, ARM Mali-G52 MP1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M8 HD Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Qualcomm Adreno 504, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (14 - 126, n=19)
61.7 Points ∼100% +342%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
16.087 Points ∼26% +15%
Average Mediatek MT8768
14 Points ∼23% 0%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
13.964 Points ∼23%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Points ∼0% -100%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=108)
61 Points ∼100% +166%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
25.645 Points ∼42% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
25.067 Points ∼41% +9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
23.989 Points ∼39% +4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
23.559 Points ∼39% +3%
Average Mediatek MT8768
23 Points ∼38% 0%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
22.969 Points ∼38%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Tablet (13 - 182, n=43)
74.8 Points ∼100% +141%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
34 Points ∼45% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
32 Points ∼43% +3%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
31 Points ∼41%
Average Mediatek MT8768
31 Points ∼41% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
30 Points ∼40% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
30 Points ∼40% -3%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (5.68 - 139, n=28)
55 runs/min ∼100% +312%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
15.49 runs/min ∼28% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
13.5 runs/min ∼25% +1%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
13.34 runs/min ∼24%
Average Mediatek MT8768
13.3 runs/min ∼24% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
12.2 runs/min ∼22% -9%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=193)
7803 Points ∼100% +85%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
4378 Points ∼56% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
4297 Points ∼55% +2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
4222 Points ∼54% 0%
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
4215 Points ∼54%
Average Mediatek MT8768
4215 Points ∼54% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
4115 Points ∼53% -2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 )
11258.2 ms * ∼100%
Average Mediatek MT8768
11258 ms * ∼100% -0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser)
11253.8 ms * ∼100% -0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser)
11102.9 ms * ∼99% +1%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79)
10893.8 ms * ∼97% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
10654.6 ms * ∼95% +5%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=205)
8823 ms * ∼78% +22%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei MatePad T8Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020Amazon Fire HD 8 2020Lenovo Tab M8 HDSamsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
15%
16%
12%
17%
-41%
-29%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
62.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
64.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
69.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
40 (6.38 - 65.8, n=136)
-36%
50.2 (14 - 73.8, n=72)
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
84.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
83.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
87.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
59.2 (8.1 - 87.7, n=136)
-29%
68.1 (17.6 - 87.7, n=72)
-18%
Random Write 4KB
14.63
15.62
7%
15.72
7%
15.84
8%
16.89
15%
8.08 (0.49 - 44.9, n=254)
-45%
11.5 (0.13 - 262, n=224)
-21%
Random Read 4KB
57.46
69.06
20%
67.61
18%
77.44
35%
57.77
1%
21.7 (2.49 - 62.1, n=254)
-62%
25.9 (1.04 - 230, n=224)
-55%
Sequential Write 256KB
67.43
100.19
49%
103.95
54%
79.55
18%
108.54
61%
43.1 (8.74 - 106, n=254)
-36%
57 (2.04 - 732, n=224)
-15%
Sequential Read 256KB
274.1
314.2
15%
315.01
15%
297.09
8%
291.87
6%
165 (9.66 - 294, n=254)
-40%
149 (6.75 - 1789, n=224)
-46%
PUBG Mobile
0102030Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø24.5 (19-27)
; Smooth: Ø24.5 (17-26)
Real Racing 3
010203040Tooltip
: Ø23.7 (17-32)
Hög belastning
 26.6 °C26.1 °C27.2 °C 
 26.6 °C25.9 °C27.8 °C 
 26.2 °C25.8 °C27.3 °C 
Max: 27.8 °C
Medel: 26.6 °C
26.2 °C26.3 °C26.6 °C
25.7 °C26.5 °C26.6 °C
25.5 °C26 °C26.7 °C
Max: 26.7 °C
Medel: 26.2 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  26.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 34.6 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
Recension av Huawei MatePad T8
Recension av Huawei MatePad T8
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.947.6252945.53121.941.34022475029.948.4632249.48019.349.110016.352.91251452.316016.954.220014.955.825014.156.33151057.3400115950011.763.963010.968.280011.972.610001173.9125010.277.9160011.477.1200012.879.4250012.984.5315012.587.240001388500013.184.7630013.481.6800015.777.11000013.574125001469.41600013.765.1SPL24.894.6N0.695.3median 13median 72.6Delta1.11129.83325.226.621.626.924.717.929.625.522.523.925.126.320.125.819.926.920.836.917.641.117.647.417.450.316.153.613.95514.559.216.161.314.56714.471.513.672.113.973.514.576.114.477.814.877.614.776.814.873.614.971.915.170.91562.615.147.426.9860.959.1median 14.9median 62.61.512.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MatePad T8Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MatePad T8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Lenovo Tab M8 HD audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.17 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.68 / 2.24 / 2.27 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.06 / 4.45 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MatePad T8
5100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
4850 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4850 mAh
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5100 mAh
Power Consumption
-19%
-23%
10%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
0.68
0.74
-9%
0.72
-6%
0.66
3%
0.62
9%
Idle Average *
2.24
2.81
-25%
2.97
-33%
2.15
4%
2.68
-20%
Idle Maximum *
2.27
2.83
-25%
2.99
-32%
2.18
4%
2.7
-19%
Load Average *
3.06
3.73
-22%
4.02
-31%
2.48
19%
3.61
-18%
Load Maximum *
4.45
4.97
-12%
5.1
-15%
3.49
22%
4
10%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
39tim 53min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15tim 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18tim 57min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
5tim 59min
Huawei MatePad T8
5100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020
4850 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2020
4850 mAh
Lenovo Tab M8 HD
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5100 mAh
Battery Runtime
-8%
-8%
30%
-1%
Reader / Idle
2393
2661
11%
3581
50%
3132
31%
H.264
1137
949
-17%
1696
49%
934
-18%
WiFi v1.3
949
869
-8%
902
-5%
1124
18%
831
-12%
Load
359
286
-20%
374
4%
342
-5%

För

+ Skärm med hög kontrast
+ Snabbt WiFi
+ GPS-modul
+ Bra batteritid

Emot

- Låg ljusstyrka
- Ingen ljussensor
- Låg upplösning
- Endast 16/32 GB
- 2 GB RAM
- microUSB-port
- Tar lång tid att ladda
- Saknar GMS

Omdöme: MatePad T8 - Huaweis lösningar lyckas inte kompensera för att den saknar Googles Play-tjänsterna

Recension av Huawei MatePad T8: Recensionsex från: notebooksbilliger.de
Recension av Huawei MatePad T8: Recensionsex från: notebooksbilliger.de

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

T8 är riktigt konkurrenskraftig när det kommer till prestanda, konstruktionskvalitet och batteritid. WiFi-modulen i Huaweis platta lyckades dessutom få topp-poäng i vårt WiFi-test. För ett litet prispåslag om 200 kronor går det dessutom att få en version med ett LTE-modem.

IPS-panelen har relativt stabila betraktningsvinklar och färgåtergivningen är på en bra nivå för en surfplatta som kostar 1.000 kronor. Men skärmen är inte tillräckligt ljusstark för att kunna användas utomhus en solig dag. Huruvida någon enhet borde komma med 2 GB RAM och 16 GB eMMC-minne 2020 kan diskuteras. Däremot borde i vårt tycke ingen enhet komma med en microUSB-port och en laddare på 5 watt.

På grund av Google-situationen är det väldigt svårt att komma fram till en slutsats rörande den billiga MatePad T8. Det är inga problem att titta på YouTube-filmer, surfa på nätet eller läsa PDF-filer med T8. Appar som inte behöver Google Play-tjänsterna fungerar bra. Men om dina favoritappar behöver Google Play-tjänsterna är det inte mycket att göra. Vidare har Huaweis AppGallery inte något särskilt stort utbud av appar.

Huawei lyckas inte kompensera för att många användare nog kommer sakna Google Play-tjänsterna på deras billiga surfplatta. T8 har heller inte några avgörande egenskaper som får den att stå ut från mängden.

Huawei MatePad T8 - 09/18/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Design
78 / 98 → 79%
Tangentbord
67 / 80 → 84%
Mus
84%
Anslutningar
38 / 70 → 54%
Vikt
86 / 40-88 → 96%
Batteri
91%
Skärm
82%
Spelprestanda
8 / 78 → 11%
Programprestanda
43 / 92 → 47%
Temperatur
96%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 83%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Medel
68%
81%
Tablet - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Huawei MatePad T8 - Är surfplattan för 1.000 kronor värd pengarna? (Sammanfattning)
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-09-22 (Update: 2020-09-22)