Test: Lenovo Tab P10 Surfplatta (Sammanfattning)

Name: Lenovo Tab P10
Brand: Lenovo

Fristående - Lenovo Tab P10 är mer estetiskt tilltalande än de flesta Android-surfplattor. Glasbaksidan ser bra ut och dubblar som en smart skärm när den ansluts till nya Lenovo Smart Dock tack vare att Amazon Alexa finns inbyggd. Men enheten drivs av en enkel Snapdragon 450 SoC och dockan finns bara att köpa i ett paket tillsammans med surfplattan, så allt är inte perfekt. Läs vidare för att få reda på hur denna mittenskikts-surfplatta står sig mot sina konkurrenter.

Inge Schwabe, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 01/28/2019

Android ARM Smart Home Tablet Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Lenovo Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

En av Tab P10:s fyra högtalare och pogo pin-anslutningen

USB Typ C-porten och 3.5 mm-ljudanslutningen

En titt på Tab P10:s framsida i porträttläge

Den inkluderade Europeiska laddaren och USB Typ A till USB Typ C-kabeln

Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» T opp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones

Storleksjämförelse

Chuwi Hi9 Plus Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Chuwi HiPad Huawei MediaPad T5 10 Lenovo Tab P10 ❌

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Chuwi HiPad Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 32 GB eMMC Flash	248 MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash	229 MBit/s ∼92% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	216 (49^min - 250^max) MBit/s ∼87% +1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash	214 MBit/s ∼86% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10 Adreno 506, SD 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash	214 (206^min - 223^max) MBit/s ∼86%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 64 GB eMMC Flash	197 (191^min - 201^max) MBit/s ∼79% -8%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Tab P10 Adreno 506, SD 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash	326 (314^min - 338^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	312 (291^min - 325^max) MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 64 GB eMMC Flash	248 (114^min - 278^max) MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash	239 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash	237 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
Chuwi HiPad Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 32 GB eMMC Flash	195 MBit/s ∼60% -40%

Lenovo Tab P10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø214 (206-223)

Chuwi Hi9 Plus MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø197 (191-201)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø216 (49-250)

Lenovo Tab P10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø326 (314-338)

Chuwi Hi9 Plus MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø248 (114-278)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø312 (291-325)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Lenovo Tab P10

Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium

Apple iPhone Xs

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Lenovo Tab P10

Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium

Apple iPhone Xs

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Lenovo Tab P10

Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium

Apple iPhone Xs

Canon EOS 70D

ColorChecker Passport: Den lägre halvan av varje färgområde visar referensfärgen


462 cd/m²	505 cd/m²	527 cd/m²
457 cd/m²	522 cd/m²	528 cd/m²
441 cd/m²	506 cd/m²	506 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 528 cd/m² Medel: 494.9 cd/m² Minimum: 5.14 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 84 %
Mitt på batteriet: 522 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1273:1 (Svärta: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 9.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.14

	Lenovo Tab P10 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1	Chuwi HiPad IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1	Chuwi Hi9 Plus IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8	Huawei MediaPad T5 10 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1	Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N IPS, 1920x1200, 10.5
Screen		4%	-1%	10%	25%	30%
Brightness middle	522	408.7 -22%	308 -41%	356 -32%	382 -27%	556 7%
Brightness	495	396 -20%	297 -40%	340 -31%	378 -24%	514 4%
Brightness Distribution	84	85 1%	92 10%	92 10%	92 10%	87 4%
Black Level *	0.41	0.51 -24%	0.29 29%	0.5 -22%	0.24 41%	0.42 -2%
Contrast	1273	801 -37%	1062 -17%	712 -44%	1592 25%	1324 4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	6.7	4.13 38%	6.2 7%	2.3 66%	2.8 58%	1.8 73%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	12.2	7.34 40%	10.5 14%	6.5 47%	6 51%	3.2 74%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	9.1	4.4 52%	6.6 27%	1.4 85%	3.5 62%	2.2 76%
Gamma	2.14 ^103%	2.24 ^98%	2.19 ^100%	2.16 ^102%	2.33 ^94%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	9417 ^69%	7389 ^88%	8216 ^79%	6565 ^99%	6903 ^94%	6819 ^95%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

34250 Hz

≤ 4 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 34250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 4 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 34250 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17612 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9.2 ms rise
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
64.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 28.4 ms rise
64.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 36 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.8 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	11575 Points ∼26% +255%
Average of class Tablet (840 - 43802, n=44)	5664 Points ∼13% +74%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	3685 Points ∼8% +13%
Chuwi HiPad	3643 Points ∼8% +12%
Lenovo Tab P10	3261 Points ∼7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2777 - 3374, n=8)	3113 Points ∼7% -5%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	3077 Points ∼7% -6%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	5809 Points ∼10% +57%
Chuwi HiPad	5064 Points ∼9% +37%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	4636 Points ∼8% +25%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=61)	4628 Points ∼8% +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	3846 Points ∼7% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3272 - 4022, n=11)	3838 Points ∼7% +4%
Lenovo Tab P10	3705 Points ∼6%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	3316 Points ∼6% -10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Chuwi HiPad	1797 Points ∼27% +141%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1641 Points ∼24% +120%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1634 Points ∼24% +119%
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=61)	1624 Points ∼24% +117%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	885 Points ∼13% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (741 - 787, n=11)	760 Points ∼11% +2%
Lenovo Tab P10	747 Points ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	745 Points ∼11% 0%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	5114 Points ∼33% +20%
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 12466, n=58)	4786 Points ∼31% +13%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	4615 Points ∼30% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4171 - 4759, n=11)	4480 Points ∼29% +5%
Chuwi HiPad	4354 Points ∼28% +2%
Lenovo Tab P10	4250 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	4171 Points ∼27% -2%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	4077 Points ∼27% -4%
Work performance score
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	5798 Points ∼29% +17%
Chuwi HiPad	5463 Points ∼27% +10%
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 13629, n=94)	5212 Points ∼26% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4836 - 5656, n=11)	5210 Points ∼26% +5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	5040 Points ∼25% +2%
Lenovo Tab P10	4949 Points ∼25%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	4922 Points ∼25% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	4914 Points ∼25% -1%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2323 Points ∼29% +30%
Average of class Tablet (650 - 4756, n=58)	1900 Points ∼24% +6%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1804 Points ∼23% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10	1793 Points ∼23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1529 - 1823, n=11)	1769 Points ∼22% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	1768 Points ∼22% -1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	1635 Points ∼21% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2069 Points ∼22% +400%
Average of class Tablet (99 - 9453, n=58)	1842 Points ∼19% +345%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	972 Points ∼10% +135%
Lenovo Tab P10	414 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	413 Points ∼4% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (411 - 415, n=11)	413 Points ∼4% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	399 Points ∼4% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2121 Points ∼26% +325%
Average of class Tablet (129 - 7369, n=58)	1651 Points ∼20% +231%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1083 Points ∼13% +117%
Lenovo Tab P10	499 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	498 Points ∼6% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (491 - 501, n=11)	498 Points ∼6% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	480 Points ∼6% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2101 Points ∼36% +17%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1871 Points ∼32% +4%
Lenovo Tab P10	1793 Points ∼31%
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4702, n=65)	1791 Points ∼31% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1580 - 1816, n=11)	1767 Points ∼31% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	1766 Points ∼31% -2%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	1473 Points ∼26% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=65)	3061 Points ∼11% +331%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2208 Points ∼8% +211%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1133 Points ∼4% +59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (709 - 718, n=11)	713 Points ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	712 Points ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	711 Points ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	611 Points ∼2% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2183 Points ∼16% +166%
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=65)	2151 Points ∼16% +162%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1242 Points ∼9% +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (808 - 828, n=11)	822 Points ∼6% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	821 Points ∼6% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	821 Points ∼6%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	702 Points ∼5% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2419 Points ∼46% +32%
Lenovo Tab P10	1832 Points ∼35%
Chuwi HiPad	1803 Points ∼35% -2%
Average of class Tablet (729 - 4096, n=74)	1789 Points ∼34% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1521 - 1855, n=11)	1788 Points ∼34% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	1775 Points ∼34% -3%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	1746 Points ∼34% -5%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1654 Points ∼32% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1504 Points ∼18% +313%
Average of class Tablet (55 - 8548, n=74)	1476 Points ∼17% +305%
Chuwi HiPad	632 Points ∼7% +74%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	626 Points ∼7% +72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (363 - 369, n=11)	365 Points ∼4% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	364 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	363 Points ∼4% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	140 Points ∼2% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1642 Points ∼8% +271%
Average of class Tablet (70 - 6850, n=76)	1382 Points ∼7% +212%
Chuwi HiPad	739 Points ∼4% +67%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	726 Points ∼4% +64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (441 - 449, n=11)	444 Points ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	443 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	441 Points ∼2% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	176 Points ∼1% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2445 Points ∼46% +35%
Lenovo Tab P10	1814 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	1802 Points ∼34% -1%
Chuwi HiPad	1785 Points ∼34% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1504 - 1833, n=11)	1781 Points ∼34% -2%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1714 Points ∼32% -6%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 4104, n=77)	1668 Points ∼32% -8%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	1586 Points ∼30% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Tablet (42 - 12725, n=77)	2057 Points ∼16% +198%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1719 Points ∼14% +149%
Chuwi HiPad	921 Points ∼7% +33%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	890 Points ∼7% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (690 - 716, n=11)	700 Points ∼6% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	696 Points ∼5% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10	691 Points ∼5%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	100 Points ∼1% -86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1840 Points ∼19% +130%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 8675, n=78)	1697 Points ∼18% +112%
Chuwi HiPad	1032 Points ∼11% +29%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	996 Points ∼10% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (800 - 824, n=11)	809 Points ∼8% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	806 Points ∼8% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10	801 Points ∼8%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	126 Points ∼1% -84%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	14698 Points ∼17% +4%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51436, n=173)	14298 Points ∼17% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	14147 Points ∼16% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	14108 Points ∼16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (13596 - 15177, n=10)	14046 Points ∼16% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	12893 Points ∼15% -9%
Chuwi HiPad	12462 Points ∼14% -12%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	11203 Points ∼13% -21%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	35210 Points ∼6% +184%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 221941, n=173)	24384 Points ∼4% +97%
Chuwi HiPad	16016 Points ∼3% +29%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	15682 Points ∼3% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12281 - 12550, n=10)	12423 Points ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	12400 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	12323 Points ∼2% -1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	10466 Points ∼2% -16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	26875 Points ∼11% +111%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 110846, n=174)	18399 Points ∼7% +44%
Chuwi HiPad	15061 Points ∼6% +18%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	14402 Points ∼6% +13%
Lenovo Tab P10	12743 Points ∼5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12562 - 12878, n=10)	12732 Points ∼5% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	12686 Points ∼5% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	10923 Points ∼4% -14%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	96 fps ∼1% +357%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	39 fps ∼0% +86%
Chuwi HiPad	39 fps ∼0% +86%
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=193)	35.2 fps ∼0% +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (21 - 22, n=10)	21.6 fps ∼0% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	21 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	21 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	19 fps ∼0% -10%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	40 fps ∼1% +100%
Chuwi HiPad	34 fps ∼1% +70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (20 - 34, n=10)	26.7 fps ∼1% +34%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	25 fps ∼1% +25%
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=197)	23.2 fps ∼1% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	20 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	20 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	19 fps ∼1% -5%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	44 fps ∼7% +378%
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=127)	23.8 fps ∼4% +159%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	19 fps ∼3% +107%
Chuwi HiPad	19 fps ∼3% +107%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (9.2 - 9.4, n=10)	9.28 fps ∼1% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	9.2 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	9.2 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	8.5 fps ∼1% -8%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	26 fps ∼7% +199%
Chuwi HiPad	19 fps ∼5% +118%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=133)	16.8 fps ∼5% +93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (8.7 - 18, n=10)	13.1 fps ∼4% +51%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	11 fps ∼3% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	8.8 fps ∼2% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10	8.7 fps ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	8.5 fps ∼2% -2%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=79)	21.2 fps ∼0% +253%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	18 fps ∼0% +200%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	13 fps ∼0% +117%
Chuwi HiPad	13 fps ∼0% +117%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	6.1 fps ∼0% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (6 - 6.1, n=10)	6.06 fps ∼0% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10	6 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	5.1 fps ∼0% -15%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	15 fps ∼0% +163%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=79)	14.3 fps ∼0% +151%
Chuwi HiPad	12 fps ∼0% +111%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.7 - 13, n=10)	9.17 fps ∼0% +61%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	6.2 fps ∼0% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	5.7 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	5.7 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	5 fps ∼0% -12%

GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 49, n=29)	9.69 fps ∼6% +410%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1.9 - 3.7, n=3)	3.07 fps ∼2% +62%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	2.4 fps ∼2% +26%
Lenovo Tab P10	1.9 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	1.7 fps ∼1% -11%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.8 - 51.1, n=29)	9.38 fps ∼4% +753%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	2.5 fps ∼1% +127%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1.1 - 1.2, n=3)	1.133 fps ∼0% +3%
Lenovo Tab P10	1.1 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	1 fps ∼0% -9%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 58, n=29)	14.6 fps ∼7% +356%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.2 - 6.1, n=3)	5.1 fps ∼2% +59%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	3.8 fps ∼2% +19%
Lenovo Tab P10	3.2 fps ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	2.7 fps ∼1% -16%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 134, n=29)	25.1 fps ∼4% +638%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	7.2 fps ∼1% +112%
Lenovo Tab P10	3.4 fps ∼1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.4 - 3.4, n=3)	3.4 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	2.8 fps ∼0% -18%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	18 fps ∼4% +429%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 107, n=55)	15.2 fps ∼3% +347%
Chuwi HiPad	7.3 fps ∼2% +115%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	7.2 fps ∼2% +112%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 3.5, n=10)	3.42 fps ∼1% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	3.4 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	3.4 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	3.1 fps ∼1% -9%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	10 fps ∼4% +203%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 47, n=55)	9.59 fps ∼4% +191%
Chuwi HiPad	7.4 fps ∼3% +124%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 7, n=10)	5.05 fps ∼2% +53%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	4 fps ∼2% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	3.3 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	3.3 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	2.9 fps ∼1% -12%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	147305 Points ∼50% +146%
Average of class Tablet (14200 - 227987, n=67)	69584 Points ∼24% +16%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	67359 Points ∼23% +12%
Lenovo Tab P10	59916 Points ∼20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (54731 - 60077, n=10)	57703 Points ∼20% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	55314 Points ∼19% -8%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (20856 - 566378, n=32)	160864 Points ∼28% +124%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	113687 Points ∼20% +58%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	110854 Points ∼20% +55%
Chuwi HiPad	107201 Points ∼19% +49%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	87335 Points ∼15% +22%
Lenovo Tab P10	71739 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	70431 Points ∼12% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (56497 - 73468, n=11)	69869 Points ∼12% -3%

BaseMark OS II
Web
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	818 Points ∼40% +11%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	811 Points ∼40% +10%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	789 Points ∼39% +7%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=122)	767 Points ∼38% +4%
Lenovo Tab P10	734 Points ∼36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (10 - 835, n=11)	618 Points ∼30% -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	10 Points ∼0% -99%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=123)	2362 Points ∼8% +148%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1967 Points ∼7% +107%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1602 Points ∼6% +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (943 - 975, n=11)	960 Points ∼3% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10	951 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	943 Points ∼3% -1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	844 Points ∼3% -11%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2654 Points ∼30% +211%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	1960 Points ∼22% +130%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 6751, n=123)	1262 Points ∼14% +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (770 - 1522, n=11)	1001 Points ∼11% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	969 Points ∼11% +14%
Lenovo Tab P10	853 Points ∼10%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	849 Points ∼10% 0%
System
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	3318 Points ∼20% +16%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	3133 Points ∼19% +10%
Lenovo Tab P10	2861 Points ∼17%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2838 Points ∼17% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2560 - 2898, n=11)	2759 Points ∼17% -4%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=123)	2661 Points ∼16% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	2561 Points ∼16% -10%
Overall
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1769 Points ∼21% +55%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1446 Points ∼17% +27%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	1435 Points ∼17% +26%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=122)	1392 Points ∼16% +22%
Lenovo Tab P10	1142 Points ∼14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (389 - 1337, n=11)	1035 Points ∼12% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	389 Points ∼5% -66%

Legend

Lenovo Tab P10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Chuwi HiPad MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Chuwi Hi9 Plus MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei MediaPad T5 10 HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 960s, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450

Average of class Tablet

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=105)	58.7 Points ∼100% +164%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)	36.127 Points ∼62% +62%
Chuwi HiPad (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)	30.911 Points ∼53% +39%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Google Chrome 70)	29.934 Points ∼51% +34%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)	29.467 Points ∼50% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.7, n=10)	22.3 Points ∼38% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)	22.275 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)	22.084 Points ∼38% -1%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=190)	7552 Points ∼100% +85%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)	6802 Points ∼90% +67%
Chuwi HiPad (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)	6046 Points ∼80% +48%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Chrome 70)	6017 Points ∼80% +48%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)	5471 Points ∼72% +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)	4078 Points ∼54% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)	4075 Points ∼54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4115, n=11)	3971 Points ∼53% -3%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)	11529.2 ms * ∼100% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11012 - 11863, n=11)	11469 ms * ∼99% -1%
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)	11352 ms * ∼98%
Chuwi HiPad (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)	9850.9 ms * ∼85% +13%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)	9293.1 ms * ∼81% +18%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=202)	8881 ms * ∼77% +22%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Chrome 70)	7059 ms * ∼61% +38%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)	5947 ms * ∼52% +48%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)	116 Points ∼100% +13%
Average of class Tablet (36 - 386, n=78)	116 Points ∼100% +13%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)	113 Points ∼97% +10%
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)	103 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)	99 Points ∼85% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (90 - 103, n=7)	97 Points ∼84% -6%

* ... smaller is better

	Lenovo Tab P10	Chuwi HiPad	Chuwi Hi9 Plus	Huawei MediaPad T5 10	Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-31%	-44%	66%	44%	-6%	8%	-41%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	60.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	66.81 10%	20.44 -66%	72.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 19%	73.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 21%	60.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	57.8 (11.2 - 74.7, n=127) -5%	49.7 (14 - 73.8, n=70) -18%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	84.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	65.93 -22%	21.16 -75%	83.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	85.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	80.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%	76.9 (21.1 - 87.2, n=127) -9%	67.7 (17.6 - 87.7, n=70) -20%
Random Write 4KB	15.75	10.28 -35%	13.01 -17%	76.12 383%	60.8 286%	13.39 -15%	27.5 (3.4 - 147, n=145) 75%	10.6 (0.13 - 262, n=222) -33%
Random Read 4KB	53.9	40.21 -25%	42.2 -22%	76.67 42%	54.7 1%	71.13 32%	56.2 (11.4 - 149, n=145) 4%	25 (1.04 - 230, n=222) -54%
Sequential Write 256KB	205.74	73.55 -64%	132.47 -36%	83.84 -59%	126.8 -38%	103.32 -50%	175 (40 - 254, n=145) -15%	53.7 (2.04 - 732, n=222) -74%
Sequential Read 256KB	276.7	144.33 -48%	144.97 -48%	312.17 13%	247.8 -10%	285.63 3%	273 (95.6 - 704, n=145) -1%	143 (6.75 - 1789, n=222) -48%

PUBG Mobile

; Smooth; 0.10.0: Ø25.8 (19-32)

; Balanced; 0.10.0: Ø25.1 (16-27)

Arena of Valor

; min; 1.26.1.2: Ø29.1 (12-32)

; high HD; 1.26.1.2: Ø28.7 (1-31)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


35.1 °C	33 °C	31.1 °C
35.1 °C	30.5 °C	29.3 °C
32.8 °C	30.7 °C	28.2 °C

Max: 35.1 °C
Medel: 31.8 °C


28.2 °C	30.7 °C	32.8 °C
27.5 °C	28.5 °C	30.8 °C
27.5 °C	28.4 °C	28.8 °C

Max: 32.8 °C
Medel: 29.2 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 31.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.6 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo Tab P10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.02 / 0.31 Watt
Låg belastning	1.01 / 4.16 / 4.17 Watt
Hög belastning	5.45 / 6.9 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo Tab P10 7000 mAh	Chuwi HiPad 7000 mAh	Chuwi Hi9 Plus 7000 mAh	Huawei MediaPad T5 10 5100 mAh	Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh
Power Consumption		-68%	-63%	-104%	-57%	-5%
Idle Minimum *	1.01	2.7 -167%	2.18 -116%	2.33 -131%	2.01 -99%	1.26 -25%
Idle Average *	4.16	5.5 -32%	5.29 -27%	8.46 -103%	5.4 -30%	4.22 -1%
Idle Maximum *	4.17	5.6 -34%	5.37 -29%	8.49 -104%	5.44 -30%	4.29 -3%
Load Average *	5.45	7 -28%	8.56 -57%	11.14 -104%	8.55 -57%	5.48 -1%
Load Maximum *	6.9	12.2 -77%	12.86 -86%	12.3 -78%	11.53 -67%	6.57 5%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		21tim 55min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		16tim 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15tim 10min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		4tim 49min

	Lenovo Tab P10 7000 mAh	Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE 5070 mAh	Chuwi HiPad 7000 mAh	Chuwi Hi9 Plus 7000 mAh	Huawei MediaPad T5 10 5100 mAh	Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh
Battery Runtime		-40%	-38%	-37%	13%	-22%	21%
Reader / Idle	1315			1241 -6%	3329 153%	1344 2%	1960 49%
H.264	910				580 -36%	702 -23%	963 6%
WiFi v1.3	992	593 -40%	616 -38%	634 -36%	525 -47%	648 -35%	938 -5%
Load	289			93 -68%	241 -17%	196 -32%	385 33%

För

+ tjusig design

+ baksida av glas

+ belysning

+ fyra högtalare

+ kamera med LED-blixt

+ 4 GB RAM

+ mycket intern lagring för pengarna

+ fungerar som Amazon Alexa-smartskärm med Lenovo Smart Dock

+ fingeravtrycksläsare

+ USB Typ C

+ hörlursanslutning

+ lämplig för familjer och barn

Emot

- prestandan är en besvikelse

- högtalarna anpassar sig inte när enheten hålls i landskapsläge respektive porträttläge

- dålig prestanda i spel

- bloatware

- LTE är ett tillval

- inget stöd för exFAT

- utdaterade säkerhetsuppdateringar

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Lenovo Tab P10 är en skaplig surfplatta vars totala poängsumma är jämförbar med Hi9Plus och MediaPad T5 10 och den hamnar bara straxt efter Galaxy Tab A. Vi hade dock inte rekommenderat Tab P10 som en spelsurfplatta eftersom den inte är tillräckligt kraftfull för prestandahungriga spel. Den passar bra för enkla spel och allmänna uppgifter som surfande, epost eller uppspelning av video.

Lenovo Tab P10 är en lätt och tjusig surfplatta som är välutrustad, men det finns kraftigare surfplattor med liknande pris på marknaden.

Tab P10 ser dyr ut tack vare en baksida i glas och en avfasad metallram samtidigt som den har mer RAM och intern lagring än våra jämförelseenheter.

Men vi rekommenderar att vänta på att Lenovo släpper sitt paket med Smart Dock, då paketet enligt rapporter ska säljas för samma pris som surfplattan i dag kostar på egen hand. Lenovo ska först släppa paketet med Tab M10 och därefter börja sälja paketet med Tab P10. Enligt rapport ska man dock till en början sälja versionen med 3 GB RAM och 32 GB lagring i paketet, så det kan vara smart att köpa versionen med högre kapacitet om du inte vill ha Amazon Alexa-funktionaliteten.

Lenovo Tab P10 - 2019-01-2101/21/2019 v6^(old)
Inge Schwabe

Design

80%

Tangentbord

69 / 80 → 87%

Mus

80%

Anslutningar

45 / 65 → 68%

Vikt

84 / 40-88 → 92%

Batteri

98%

Skärm

82%

Spelprestanda

26 / 68 → 39%

Programprestanda

47 / 76 → 62%

Temperatur

92%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

75 / 91 → 82%

Camera

44 / 85 → 52%

Medel

71%

83%

Tablet - Vägt medel

Test: Lenovo Tab P10 Surfplatta (Sammanfattning)

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Mobile

Arena of Valor

Lenovo Tab P10 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N audio analysis

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis

För

Emot

Pricecompare