Notebookcheck

Test: Lenovo IdeaPad L340 Gaming - Stel klickplatta påverkar det roliga (Sammanfattning)

Mike Wobker, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 10/21/2019

Det låga priset är den största fördelen. Lenovo har polerat chassit på V155 en aning och lagt billig, men ändå spelförberedd, hårdvara i 15-tumshöljet. Resultatet är IdeaPad L340 Gaming, som kostar mindre än 8.000 kronor. Men det rör sig förstås inte om något toppskiktsspelande. I vår recension visar vi exakt vilka kompromisser som har behövt göras.

Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE (Ideapad L340-15 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i5-9300H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) - 4096 MB, Kärna: 1395 MHz, Minne: 2001 MHz, GDDR5, TU117M, NVIDIA 430.81, Intel UHD Graphics 630
Minne
8192 MB 
, Enkel kanal
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, CMN 156HCA-EAB, IPS, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Hårddisk
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512, 512 GB 
, , 454 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Anslutningar
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm kombinerad ljudanslutning
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8168B/8111B Family PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 23.9 x 363 x 254.6
Batteri
45 Wh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: 0.9 MP, 16:9 (1280x720)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.082 kg, Strömförsörjning: 586 g
Pris
799 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH

Storleksjämförelse

413 mm 284.7 mm 25.3 mm 2.5 kg360.4 mm 262 mm 26.8 mm 2.2 kg363 mm 254.6 mm 23.9 mm 2.1 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 252 mm 20.4 mm 2.1 kg
Vänster sida: Nätadapter, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, 2x USB 3.1 Gen1, 1x, 3.5 mm kombinerad ljudanslutning, 1x USB 3.0 Typ C
Vänster sida: Nätadapter, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, 2x USB 3.1 Gen1, 1x, 3.5 mm kombinerad ljudanslutning, 1x USB 3.0 Typ C
Höger sida: Kensington-lås
Höger sida: Kensington-lås
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
646 MBit/s ∼100% +123%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1380, n=283)
614 MBit/s ∼95% +112%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
586 MBit/s ∼91% +102%
Asus ROG GA502DU
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
332 MBit/s ∼51% +14%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
290 MBit/s ∼45%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
274 (min: 155, max: 311) MBit/s ∼42% -6%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼100% +120%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
617 MBit/s ∼91% +100%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1160, n=283)
566 MBit/s ∼83% +83%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
309 MBit/s ∼45%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
294 (min: 246, max: 336) MBit/s ∼43% -5%
Asus ROG GA502DU
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
252 MBit/s ∼37% -18%
262
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
250
cd/m²
275
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
243
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
229
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
CMN 156HCA-EAB
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 275 cd/m² Medel: 253 cd/m² Minimum: 28.2 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 83 %
Mitt på batteriet: 275 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1528:1 (Svärta: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 4.4
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
63.6% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 40.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
CMN 156HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
Chi Mei N173HCE-E31, , 1920x1080, 17.3
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
LGD05CE, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Panda LM156LF-GL, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus ROG GA502DU
Panda LM156LF-CL03, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-15%
8%
22%
5%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45.6 (23.6, 22)
32 (16, 16)
30%
40 (21.2, 18.8)
12%
30.4 (14, 16.4)
33%
34 (17.2, 16.8)
25%
Response Time Black / White *
30.8 (16.8, 14)
23 (14, 9)
25%
29.6 (17.2, 12.4)
4%
27.6 (17.6, 10)
10%
28 (17.2, 10.8)
9%
PWM Frequency
25910 (20)
250 (20)
-99%
21280 (34)
-18%
Screen
22%
-6%
-15%
-10%
Brightness middle
275
318
16%
251
-9%
286.2
4%
240.1
-13%
Brightness
253
292
15%
232
-8%
267
6%
231
-9%
Brightness Distribution
83
85
2%
76
-8%
84
1%
85
2%
Black Level *
0.18
0.21
-17%
0.17
6%
0.33
-83%
0.34
-89%
Contrast
1528
1514
-1%
1476
-3%
867
-43%
706
-54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.4
4.04
25%
6.2
-15%
5.45
-1%
4.2
22%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
21.3
6.59
69%
18.6
13%
18.08
15%
17.8
16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.4
2.06
53%
4.8
-9%
4.47
-2%
4.09
7%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.7
4.21
-14%
4.2
-14%
5.3
-43%
2.8
24%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.5 88%
2.32 95%
2.1 105%
2.2 100%
CCT
6376 102%
7189 90%
7454 87%
7679 85%
6925 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
40.8
60
47%
36.5
-11%
37.6
-8%
38.4
-6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
63.6
93
46%
57.4
-10%
59.1
-7%
60.4
-5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / 14%
1% / -4%
4% / -9%
-3% / -6%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.8 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.6 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 25910 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 25910 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 25910 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9364 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø755 (746.1-761.43)
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø708 (647.94-717.51)
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø748 (730.55-769.02)
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H: Ø741 (732.32-778.15)
Asus ROG GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H: Ø790 (787.28-796.5)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H
176 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H
  (169 - 176, n=10)
173 Points ∼98% -2%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points ∼97% -3%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
157 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 215, n=534)
157 Points ∼89% -11%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
144 Points ∼82% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=537)
839 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
805 Points ∼96% 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H
801 (min: 748.64, max: 797.24) Points ∼95%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
799 Points ∼95% 0%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H
  (717 - 850, n=10)
783 Points ∼93% -2%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
769 Points ∼92% -4%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
Intel Core i5-9300H
717 Points ∼85% -10%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
801 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
80.27 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
176 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (1764 - 11245, n=226)
6400 Points ∼100% +26%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5282 Points ∼83% +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
5064 Points ∼79%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5044 Points ∼79% 0%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (4717 - 5182, n=8)
5021 Points ∼78% -1%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
4717 Points ∼74% -7%
Asus ROG GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4682 Points ∼73% -8%
Productivity
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
7434 Points ∼100% +32%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
7261 Points ∼98% +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (4175 - 9077, n=227)
7186 Points ∼97% +28%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (5633 - 7809, n=8)
6986 Points ∼94% +24%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
6518 Points ∼88% +16%
Asus ROG GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
6305 Points ∼85% +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
5633 Points ∼76%
Essentials
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
8673 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (8108 - 9161, n=8)
8670 Points ∼100% +7%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
8575 Points ∼99% +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (4892 - 11266, n=228)
8555 Points ∼99% +6%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8355 Points ∼96% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
8108 Points ∼93%
Asus ROG GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7424 Points ∼86% -8%
Score
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=230)
5242 Points ∼100% +19%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
4873 Points ∼93% +11%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
4821 Points ∼92% +10%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (4400 - 5150, n=8)
4817 Points ∼92% +9%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4732 Points ∼90% +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
4400 Points ∼84%
Asus ROG GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4322 Points ∼82% -2%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5107 Points ∼100% +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=406)
5051 Points ∼99% +11%
Asus ROG GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4956 Points ∼97% +9%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (4556 - 5107, n=5)
4953 Points ∼97% +9%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
4922 Points ∼96% +8%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4701 Points ∼92% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
4556 Points ∼89%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=423)
4265 Points ∼100% +25%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3917 Points ∼92% +15%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
3691 Points ∼87% +8%
Average Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (3416 - 3848, n=5)
3666 Points ∼86% +7%
Asus ROG GA502DU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3642 Points ∼85% +7%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
3582 Points ∼84% +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
3416 Points ∼80%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3416 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4556 poäng
Hjälp
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Asus ROG GA502DU
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Average WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
8%
50%
9%
1%
4%
Write 4K
103.6
100.7
-3%
112.1
8%
137.5
33%
132.2
28%
102 (101 - 104, n=2)
-2%
Read 4K
39.91
40.26
1%
42.01
5%
56.96
43%
55.5
39%
40.1 (39.9 - 40.3, n=2)
0%
Write Seq
1160
1196
3%
1964
69%
983.8
-15%
986.2
-15%
1178 (1160 - 1196, n=2)
2%
Read Seq
990.1
1091
10%
2065
109%
1564
58%
1318
33%
1041 (990 - 1091, n=2)
5%
Write 4K Q32T1
283.4
376
33%
318.2
12%
237.4
-16%
220.3
-22%
330 (283 - 376, n=2)
16%
Read 4K Q32T1
344.5
418.6
22%
406.7
18%
340.7
-1%
315.5
-8%
382 (345 - 419, n=2)
11%
Write Seq Q32T1
1455
1459
0%
2534
74%
958.8
-34%
986.6
-32%
1457 (1455 - 1459, n=2)
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
1690
1684
0%
3438
103%
1732
2%
1416
-16%
1687 (1684 - 1690, n=2)
0%
AS SSD
11%
50%
-16%
-20%
6%
Copy Game MB/s
744.66
907.05
866.7
818.54
745
Copy Program MB/s
370.55
392.55
444.49
496.94
371
Copy ISO MB/s
953.55
1417.66
942.16
905.3
954
Score Total
2961
3294
11%
4323
46%
1717
-42%
1641
-45%
3128 (2961 - 3294, n=2)
6%
Score Write
1215
1480
22%
1901
56%
992
-18%
927
-24%
1348 (1215 - 1480, n=2)
11%
Score Read
1143
1195
5%
1619
42%
472
-59%
459
-60%
1169 (1143 - 1195, n=2)
2%
Access Time Write *
0.039
0.036
8%
0.032
18%
0.047
-21%
0.045
-15%
0.0375 (0.036 - 0.039, n=2)
4%
Access Time Read *
0.105
0.058
45%
0.084
20%
0.065
38%
0.064
39%
0.0815 (0.058 - 0.105, n=2)
22%
4K-64 Write
985.53
1269.9
29%
1538.26
56%
787.44
-20%
735.67
-25%
1128 (986 - 1270, n=2)
14%
4K-64 Read
995.93
1027.3
3%
1282.6
29%
321.49
-68%
321.47
-68%
1012 (996 - 1027, n=2)
2%
4K Write
93.97
77.04
-18%
118.58
26%
115.48
23%
98.74
5%
85.5 (77 - 94, n=2)
-9%
4K Read
37.77
39.59
5%
40.56
7%
48.22
28%
47.26
25%
38.7 (37.8 - 39.6, n=2)
2%
Seq Write
1353.86
1326.99
-2%
2439.74
80%
888.5
-34%
926.26
-32%
1340 (1327 - 1354, n=2)
-1%
Seq Read
1090.46
1278.33
17%
2955.46
171%
1019.04
-7%
906.87
-17%
1184 (1090 - 1278, n=2)
9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
10% / 10%
50% / 50%
-4% / -6%
-10% / -11%
5% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
Sequential Read: 1068 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1161 MB/s
512K Read: 655.7 MB/s
512K Write: 905.7 MB/s
4K Read: 34.93 MB/s
4K Write: 72.57 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 236.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 184.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
17170 Points ∼100% +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=636)
13686 Points ∼80% +3%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
13575 Points ∼79% +2%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
13447 Points ∼78% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
13270 Points ∼77%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
13230 Points ∼77% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (12388 - 13575, n=17)
13210 Points ∼77% 0%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=173)
5780 Points ∼100% +64%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4867 Points ∼84% +38%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
3568 Points ∼62% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
3565 Points ∼62% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
3517 Points ∼61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (3353 - 3700, n=16)
3508 Points ∼61% 0%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
13355 Points ∼100% +45%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=561)
11547 Points ∼86% +25%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
9536 Points ∼71% +3%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
9428 Points ∼71% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (8532 - 9536, n=17)
9264 Points ∼69% 0%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
9227 Points ∼69% 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
9221 Points ∼69%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=542)
68419 Points ∼100% +26%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
57365 Points ∼84% +5%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
56617 Points ∼83% +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
54393 Points ∼79%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (38016 - 61286, n=12)
54186 Points ∼79% 0%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
44557 Points ∼65% -18%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
40948 Points ∼60% -25%
3DMark 11 Performance
11307 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
20115 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7833 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
3459 poäng
Hjälp
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
102.3 fps ∼100% +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.7 - 266, n=355)
99 fps ∼97% +26%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
87.7 fps ∼86% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (68.5 - 90.8, n=12)
82.1 fps ∼80% +4%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
80.5 fps ∼79% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
78.7 fps ∼77%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
73.9 fps ∼72% -6%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Gaming
  (15.3 - 133, n=27)
94.5 fps ∼100% +20%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
89 (min: 73.8) fps ∼94% +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (63.3 - 98.5, n=5)
80.7 fps ∼85% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
79 (min: 70.3) fps ∼84%
Anno 1800
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality (DX11)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.4 - 54.3, n=25)
35.2 fps ∼100% +103%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (17.4 - 22.7, n=5)
20.1 fps ∼57% +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
17.35 fps ∼49%
1920x1080 High Graphics Quality (DX11)
Average of class Gaming
  (7 - 92.2, n=23)
60.5 fps ∼100% +78%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (34 - 44.7, n=5)
39.8 fps ∼66% +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
33.98 fps ∼56%
1920x1080 Medium Graphics Quality (DX11)
Average of class Gaming
  (12 - 115, n=14)
69 fps ∼100% +59%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (43.3 - 69.8, n=5)
56.7 fps ∼82% +31%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
43.3 fps ∼63%
1280x720 Low Graphics Quality (DX11)
Average of class Gaming
  (38 - 98.5, n=12)
73.5 fps ∼100% +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (49.2 - 74.9, n=4)
60.3 fps ∼82% +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
53.85 fps ∼73%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=331)
50.5 fps ∼100% +46%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
48.8 fps ∼97% +41%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
37 fps ∼73% +7%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
36.2 fps ∼72% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (33.1 - 38.1, n=16)
35.3 fps ∼70% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
34.5 (min: 32, max: 37, 99th percentile: 32) fps ∼68%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
34.2 fps ∼68% -1%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 194, n=284)
88.6 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
83.9 fps ∼95%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
62.7 fps ∼71%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
62.2 fps ∼70%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (57.3 - 67.6, n=14)
62 fps ∼70%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
57.5 fps ∼65%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming
  (20.9 - 284, n=172)
145 fps ∼100%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
109.6 fps ∼76%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (92 - 126, n=10)
109 fps ∼75%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
100.1 fps ∼69%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming
  (17 - 414, n=161)
207 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (127 - 209, n=11)
163 fps ∼79%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
157.1 fps ∼76%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
146.4 fps ∼71%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
138.4 fps ∼67%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
135.8 fps ∼66%
X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.2 - 92.5, n=33)
64 fps ∼100% +18%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
55 fps ∼86% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (44.5 - 64.7, n=4)
54.6 fps ∼85% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
54.1 fps ∼85%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.9 - 114, n=33)
75 fps ∼100% +23%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
62 fps ∼83% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (50.5 - 73.2, n=4)
61.7 fps ∼82% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
61 fps ∼81%
051015202530354045Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512: Ø34.5 (32-37)
låg med. hög ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 191 160.77 148.56 78.7 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 34.5 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 114 97 79 73 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 73 61 54.1 fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 53.85 43.3 33.98 17.35 fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB(A)
Hög belastning
30.1 / 40.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 28.4 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.329.831.632.32535.127.927.5383131.126.424.233403124.323.926.95026.325.22726.36326.623.323.128.88024.922.922.727.410025.123.822.325.312526.225.622.626.516023.422.421.624.920024.622.420.825.225026.321.520.527.131526.821.520.227.140029.121.419.729.650030.320.918.930.1630332118.432.580029.919.617.829.8100028.218.81728.5125030.719.616.330.6160028.917.815.629.4200027.317.715.527.9250030.118.315.429.8315026.216.115.126400028.215.615.128.1500025.415.41525.6630022.515.31522.3800019.115.315191000017.615.214.916.91250018.315.214.6161600018.614.814.515.6SPL40.230.128.440.2N3.41.41.13.4median 26.3median 18.8median 16.3median 27.1Delta2.92.923.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
 44.8 °C44.6 °C39.2 °C 
 43 °C43.6 °C33.2 °C 
 33.7 °C31.1 °C27.6 °C 
Max: 44.8 °C
Medel: 37.9 °C
41.6 °C50.3 °C58.1 °C
29.1 °C44.7 °C46.9 °C
26.5 °C30.1 °C28.9 °C
Max: 58.1 °C
Medel: 39.6 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  47 °C | Rumstemperatur 23.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58.1 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.6 °C / 94.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.8 °C / -10.5 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.632.42527.528.13124.228.24023.926.4502725.36323.124.28022.723.210022.323.112522.622.816021.623.820020.833.325020.544.531520.249.640019.752.450018.950.563018.44880017.85610001755.1125016.355.7160015.657.4200015.556.8250015.453.9315015.155.7400015.151.350001554.363001551.780001555.71000014.952.81250014.649.61600014.546.2SPL28.466.7N1.121.3median 16.3median 51.7Delta26.335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGEApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.47 / 0.64 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 3.8 / 6.6 / 8.9 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 78.4 / 124 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus ROG GA502DU
3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-5%
-13%
-30%
-82%
-26%
-200%
Idle Minimum *
3.8
3.4
11%
4.04
-6%
7
-84%
7.4
-95%
4.78 (2.9 - 7, n=11)
-26%
19.4 (3.4 - 113, n=718)
-411%
Idle Average *
6.6
7.7
-17%
7.2
-9%
9.9
-50%
8.6
-30%
8.14 (5.3 - 11.2, n=11)
-23%
24.8 (6.6 - 119, n=718)
-276%
Idle Maximum *
8.9
9.6
-8%
11.4
-28%
12
-35%
39.1
-339%
14.7 (8.9 - 27.7, n=11)
-65%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=718)
-239%
Load Average *
78.4
75
4%
80.8
-3%
68.4
13%
65.9
16%
83.1 (59 - 104, n=11)
-6%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=709)
-33%
Load Maximum *
124
135
-9%
144.5
-17%
130.9
-6%
141.3
-14%
134 (80 - 192, n=11)
-8%
172 (21.9 - 590, n=708)
-39%
Witcher 3 ultra *
82
92
-12%
93.6
-14%
94.9
-16%
106.9
-30%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
7tim 49min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6tim 08min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
0tim 59min
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 45 Wh
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 45 Wh
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 52.5 Wh
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 48 Wh
Asus ROG GA502DU
3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 76 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
1%
43%
8%
78%
-7%
Reader / Idle
469
951
103%
466
-1%
916
95%
349 (39 - 1174, n=676)
-26%
WiFi v1.3
368
371
1%
385
5%
285
-23%
482
31%
259 (78 - 622, n=380)
-30%
Load
59
71
20%
87
47%
123
108%
79 (18 - 202, n=642)
34%
Witcher 3 ultra
59
56.5 (50 - 66, n=6)

För

+ matt IPS-skärm
+ skaplig spelprestanda
+ ljusstark skärm med bra kontrast
+ bra tangentbord
+ bra batteritid

Emot

- saknar minneskortsläsare
- WiFi-hastigheter under genomsnittet
- dålig klickplatta

Omdöme - Bara mindre brister

Recension av Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH Gaming. Recensionsex från:
Recension av Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH Gaming. Recensionsex från:

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH Gaming visar att till och med budgetdatorer med aningen lägre grafikprestanda kan passa bra till spel. Men man får stå ut med en del i utbyte, exempelvis en aningen svag klickplatta samt att datorn saknar minneskortsläsare. Den kunde också haft snabbare WiFi.

Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH Gaming kan spela spel utan problem till ett lågt pris.

Tillsammans med bra servicemöjligheter och en ljusstark skärm med bra kontrast och svärta är det mycket Lenovo gör rätt. Även om processorn lyckades prestera bra i det motsvarande testet och inte visade upp några tapp i prestanda blev vi förvånade över att prestandan var dålig i testet som rörde generell systemprestanda. Enkelkanals-RAM och SSD-enheten kan vara misstänkta. Även om den sistnämnda kan bytas ut har man tyvärr inget val när det kommer till minnet. Vid vardagsbruk märks dock inte de måttfulla PCMark-resultaten.

Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE - 09/28/2019 v7
Mike Wobker

Design
76 / 98 → 77%
Tangentbord
81%
Mus
79%
Anslutningar
40 / 80 → 50%
Vikt
63 / 10-66 → 94%
Batteri
70 / 95 → 73%
Skärm
81%
Spelprestanda
83%
Programprestanda
82%
Temperatur
85 / 95 → 89%
Ljudnivå
96 / 90 → 100%
Audio
53%
Camera
34 / 85 → 40%
Medel
71%
77%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Lenovo IdeaPad L340 Gaming - Stel klickplatta påverkar det roliga (Sammanfattning)
Mike Wobker, 2019-10-21 (Update: 2019-10-22)