Test: LG Q Stylus Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Name: Test: LG Q Stylus Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Item: LG Q Stylus
Rating: 80
Author: Mike Wobker

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Tanja Hinum-Balaz (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 11/08/2018

En billig stylus-telefon. Skyddad mot stötar, vatten och damm. Så presenterar LG sin Q Stylus, som kommer med en stylus inbyggd i höljet på 6.2 tum. Få reda på vad mer denna billiga smartphone har att erbjuda i vår recension.

Test device courtesy of LG Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» T opp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	675 (min: 630, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +998%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	485 MBit/s ∼72% +689%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	309 MBit/s ∼46% +402%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 939, n=381)	221 MBit/s ∼33% +259%
LG Q Stylus Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash	61.5 (min: 43, max: 58) MBit/s ∼9%
Sharp B10 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash	57.2 MBit/s ∼8% -7%
Wiko View 2 Pro Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash	43 MBit/s ∼6% -30%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	647 (min: 598, max: 665) MBit/s ∼100% +1697%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	485 MBit/s ∼75% +1247%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	347 MBit/s ∼54% +864%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 703, n=381)	212 MBit/s ∼33% +489%
Sharp B10 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash	58 MBit/s ∼9% +61%
Wiko View 2 Pro Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash	47.6 MBit/s ∼7% +32%
LG Q Stylus Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash	36 (min: 2, max: 52) MBit/s ∼6%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø52.8 (43-58)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø37.2 (2-52)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


449 cd/m²	441 cd/m²	435 cd/m²
433 cd/m²	458 cd/m²	444 cd/m²
429 cd/m²	429 cd/m²	449 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 458 cd/m² Medel: 440.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4.01 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 458 cd/m²
Kontrast: 898:1 (Svärta: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.33

	LG Q Stylus IPS, 2160x1080, 6.2	Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.4	Sharp B10 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7	Xiaomi Pocophone F1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18	Wiko View 2 Pro IPS, 1528x720, 6	Sony Xperia XA2 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Screen		4%	-1%	17%	-32%	39%
Brightness middle	458	499 9%	560 22%	489 7%	562 23%	597 30%
Brightness	441	506 15%	549 24%	486 10%	541 23%	592 34%
Brightness Distribution	94	96 2%	90 -4%	93 -1%	92 -2%	92 -2%
Black Level *	0.51		0.63 -24%	0.34 33%	0.56 -10%	0.32 37%
Contrast	898		889 -1%	1438 60%	1004 12%	1866 108%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	4.5	4.62 -3%	5.02 -12%	3.8 16%	7.9 -76%	2.4 47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	7.1	10.91 -54%	8.71 -23%	7.1 -0%	15.7 -121%	5.3 25%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	5.1	2.2 57%	4.6 10%	4.4 14%	10.4 -104%	3.4 33%
Gamma	2.33 ^94%	2.103 ^105%	2.216 ^99%	2.22 ^99%	2.02 ^109%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	7381 ^88%	6115 ^106%	7587 ^86%	7213 ^90%	8834 ^74%	7172 ^91%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9607 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9.2 ms rise
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.4 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
67.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 37.2 ms rise
67.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.6 ms).

Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	1909 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	9059 Points ∼63% +375%
Sharp B10	1778 Points ∼12% -7%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	14369 Points ∼100% +653%
Wiko View 2 Pro	3362 Points ∼23% +76%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	3621 Points ∼25% +90%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (1909 - 2084, n=2)	1997 Points ∼14% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (870 - 21070, n=269)	4623 Points ∼32% +142%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	2798 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	8874 Points ∼97% +217%
Sharp B10	2629 Points ∼29% -6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	9182 Points ∼100% +228%
Wiko View 2 Pro	4022 Points ∼44% +44%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	4152 Points ∼45% +48%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (2135 - 2798, n=2)	2467 Points ∼27% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (1174 - 11598, n=322)	4488 Points ∼49% +60%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	653 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	1698 Points ∼69% +160%
Sharp B10	612 Points ∼25% -6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	2468 Points ∼100% +278%
Wiko View 2 Pro	778 Points ∼32% +19%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	858 Points ∼35% +31%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (639 - 653, n=2)	646 Points ∼26% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (437 - 4824, n=323)	1324 Points ∼54% +103%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	4101 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	5960 Points ∼62% +45%
Sharp B10	4447 Points ∼46% +8%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	9664 Points ∼100% +136%
Wiko View 2 Pro	5395 Points ∼56% +32%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	5659 Points ∼59% +38%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (3969 - 4101, n=2)	4035 Points ∼42% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (4290 - 13531, n=499)	5280 Points ∼55% +29%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	1110 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	2613 Points ∼100% +135%
Sharp B10	694 Points ∼27% -37%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	2257 Points ∼86% +103%
Wiko View 2 Pro	1808 Points ∼69% +63%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1756 Points ∼67% +58%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (999 - 1110, n=2)	1055 Points ∼40% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 4535, n=346)	1792 Points ∼69% +61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	319 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	3797 Points ∼85% +1090%
Sharp B10	322 Points ∼7% +1%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	4468 Points ∼100% +1301%
Wiko View 2 Pro	415 Points ∼9% +30%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	793 Points ∼18% +149%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (316 - 319, n=2)	318 Points ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (76 - 8206, n=346)	1535 Points ∼34% +381%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	379 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	3450 Points ∼94% +810%
Sharp B10	366 Points ∼10% -3%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	3669 Points ∼100% +868%
Wiko View 2 Pro	501 Points ∼14% +32%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	903 Points ∼25% +138%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (373 - 379, n=2)	376 Points ∼10% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (94 - 6312, n=349)	1431 Points ∼39% +278%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	1112 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	2649 Points ∼94% +138%
Sharp B10	771 Points ∼27% -31%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	2832 Points ∼100% +155%
Wiko View 2 Pro	1810 Points ∼64% +63%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1744 Points ∼62% +57%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (976 - 1112, n=2)	1044 Points ∼37% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=361)	1769 Points ∼62% +59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	495 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	4904 Points ∼71% +891%
Sharp B10	477 Points ∼7% -4%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	6898 Points ∼100% +1294%
Wiko View 2 Pro	716 Points ∼10% +45%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1303 Points ∼19% +163%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (493 - 495, n=2)	494 Points ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=361)	2113 Points ∼31% +327%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	565 Points ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	4124 Points ∼79% +630%
Sharp B10	521 Points ∼10% -8%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	5230 Points ∼100% +826%
Wiko View 2 Pro	827 Points ∼16% +46%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1381 Points ∼26% +144%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (554 - 565, n=2)	560 Points ∼11% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7980, n=362)	1797 Points ∼34% +218%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	1172 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	2569 Points ∼100% +119%
Sharp B10	702 Points ∼27% -40%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	2528 Points ∼98% +116%
Wiko View 2 Pro	1855 Points ∼72% +58%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1712 Points ∼67% +46%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (1031 - 1172, n=2)	1102 Points ∼43% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (486 - 4262, n=420)	1728 Points ∼67% +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	89 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	3673 Points ∼77% +4027%
Sharp B10	328 Points ∼7% +269%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	4746 Points ∼100% +5233%
Wiko View 2 Pro	369 Points ∼8% +315%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	718 Points ∼15% +707%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (80 - 89, n=2)	84.5 Points ∼2% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (65 - 6362, n=422)	1271 Points ∼27% +1328%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	112 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	3353 Points ∼84% +2894%
Sharp B10	372 Points ∼9% +232%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	3972 Points ∼100% +3446%
Wiko View 2 Pro	449 Points ∼11% +301%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	824 Points ∼21% +636%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (101 - 112, n=2)	107 Points ∼3% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5734, n=430)	1216 Points ∼31% +986%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	1172 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	2515 Points ∼92% +115%
Sharp B10	694 Points ∼26% -41%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	2720 Points ∼100% +132%
Wiko View 2 Pro	1833 Points ∼67% +56%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1757 Points ∼65% +50%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (1029 - 1172, n=2)	1101 Points ∼40% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 4240, n=453)	1633 Points ∼60% +39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	98 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	4826 Points ∼58% +4824%
Sharp B10	480 Points ∼6% +390%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	8261 Points ∼100% +8330%
Wiko View 2 Pro	706 Points ∼9% +620%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1248 Points ∼15% +1173%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (96 - 98, n=2)	97 Points ∼1% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 9983, n=453)	1729 Points ∼21% +1664%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	123 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	4008 Points ∼70% +3159%
Sharp B10	515 Points ∼9% +319%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	5687 Points ∼100% +4524%
Wiko View 2 Pro	818 Points ∼14% +565%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1334 Points ∼23% +985%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (120 - 123, n=2)	122 Points ∼2% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 7673, n=461)	1483 Points ∼26% +1106%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	10050 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	18756 Points ∼54% +87%
Sharp B10	7716 Points ∼22% -23%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	34928 Points ∼100% +248%
Wiko View 2 Pro	15177 Points ∼43% +51%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	13217 Points ∼38% +32%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (9903 - 10050, n=2)	9977 Points ∼29% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (8253 - 45072, n=615)	13397 Points ∼38% +33%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	9864 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	36190 Points ∼44% +267%
Sharp B10	9749 Points ∼12% -1%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	82125 Points ∼100% +733%
Wiko View 2 Pro	12550 Points ∼15% +27%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	18472 Points ∼22% +87%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (9656 - 9864, n=2)	9760 Points ∼12% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3588 - 162695, n=615)	19336 Points ∼24% +96%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	9905 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	29994 Points ∼47% +203%
Sharp B10	9210 Points ∼15% -7%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	63159 Points ∼100% +538%
Wiko View 2 Pro	12878 Points ∼20% +30%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	16972 Points ∼27% +71%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (9710 - 9905, n=2)	9808 Points ∼16% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (4164 - 83518, n=616)	16160 Points ∼26% +63%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	17 fps ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	146 fps ∼97% +759%
Sharp B10	17 fps ∼11% 0%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	150 fps ∼100% +782%
Wiko View 2 Pro	22 fps ∼15% +29%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	30 fps ∼20% +76%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (17 - 17, n=2)	17 fps ∼11% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 251, n=640)	33.7 fps ∼22% +98%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	16 fps ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	60 fps ∼100% +275%
Sharp B10	25 fps ∼42% +56%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	60 fps ∼100% +275%
Wiko View 2 Pro	33 fps ∼55% +106%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	28 fps ∼47% +75%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (16 - 16, n=2)	16 fps ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 120, n=643)	26.2 fps ∼44% +64%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	7.1 fps ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	76 fps ∼100% +970%
Sharp B10	6.8 fps ∼9% -4%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	71 fps ∼93% +900%
Wiko View 2 Pro	9.4 fps ∼12% +32%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	14 fps ∼18% +97%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (7.1 - 7.1, n=2)	7.1 fps ∼9% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 132, n=559)	18.4 fps ∼24% +159%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	6.7 fps ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	47 fps ∼81% +601%
Sharp B10	13 fps ∼22% +94%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	58 fps ∼100% +766%
Wiko View 2 Pro	17 fps ∼29% +154%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	13 fps ∼22% +94%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (6.7 - 6.8, n=2)	6.75 fps ∼12% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5.4 - 115, n=564)	17.1 fps ∼29% +155%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	4.7 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	45 fps ∼100% +857%
Sharp B10	4.6 fps ∼10% -2%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	35 fps ∼78% +645%
Wiko View 2 Pro	6.1 fps ∼14% +30%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	9.8 fps ∼22% +109%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (4.7 - 4.7, n=2)	4.7 fps ∼10% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88, n=421)	15.3 fps ∼34% +226%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	4.5 fps ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	25 fps ∼46% +456%
Sharp B10	9.9 fps ∼18% +120%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	54 fps ∼100% +1100%
Wiko View 2 Pro	12 fps ∼22% +167%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	9.3 fps ∼17% +107%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (4.5 - 4.5, n=2)	4.5 fps ∼8% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 110, n=424)	14.7 fps ∼27% +227%

GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	1.3 fps ∼6%
Sharp B10	2.9 fps ∼13% +123%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	22 fps ∼100% +1592%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	3.1 fps ∼14% +138%
Average Mediatek MT6750S	1.3 fps ∼6% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 59, n=125)	8.92 fps ∼41% +586%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	0.86 fps ∼6%
Sharp B10	0.86 fps ∼6% 0%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	14 fps ∼100% +1528%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1.9 fps ∼14% +121%
Average Mediatek MT6750S	0.86 fps ∼6% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.26 - 31, n=125)	6.2 fps ∼44% +621%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	2 fps ∼6%
Sharp B10	4.6 fps ∼15% +130%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	31 fps ∼100% +1450%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	5.4 fps ∼17% +170%
Average Mediatek MT6750S	2 fps ∼6% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.8 - 59, n=126)	13.3 fps ∼43% +565%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	2.3 fps ∼7%
Sharp B10	2.3 fps ∼7% 0%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	32 fps ∼100% +1291%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	5.6 fps ∼18% +143%
Average Mediatek MT6750S	2.3 fps ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.94 - 63, n=125)	14.9 fps ∼47% +548%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	2.5 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	28 fps ∼80% +1020%
Sharp B10	2.4 fps ∼7% -4%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	35 fps ∼100% +1300%
Wiko View 2 Pro	3.5 fps ∼10% +40%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	5.6 fps ∼16% +124%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (2.5 - 2.5, n=2)	2.5 fps ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.89 - 54, n=350)	10.4 fps ∼30% +316%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	2.4 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	15 fps ∼45% +525%
Sharp B10	4.8 fps ∼15% +100%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	33 fps ∼100% +1275%
Wiko View 2 Pro	6.6 fps ∼20% +175%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	5.3 fps ∼16% +121%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (2.4 - 2.4, n=2)	2.4 fps ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 58, n=354)	9.32 fps ∼28% +288%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	56626 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	236552 Points ∼90% +318%
Sharp B10	53835 Points ∼20% -5%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	263165 Points ∼100% +365%
Wiko View 2 Pro	69661 Points ∼26% +23%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	89006 Points ∼34% +57%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (52855 - 56626, n=2)	54741 Points ∼21% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (36768 - 374820, n=242)	126670 Points ∼48% +124%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	45829 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	214090 Points ∼94% +367%
Sharp B10	42355 Points ∼19% -8%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	227026 Points ∼100% +395%
Wiko View 2 Pro	57201 Points ∼25% +25%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	70346 Points ∼31% +53%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (44064 - 45829, n=2)	44947 Points ∼20% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 274007, n=448)	82705 Points ∼36% +80%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	657 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	1132 Points ∼87% +72%
Sharp B10	10 Points ∼1% -98%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	1296 Points ∼100% +97%
Wiko View 2 Pro	743 Points ∼57% +13%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	936 Points ∼72% +42%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (657 - 751, n=2)	704 Points ∼54% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=573)	726 Points ∼56% +11%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	633 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	6506 Points ∼82% +928%
Sharp B10	644 Points ∼8% +2%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	7945 Points ∼100% +1155%
Wiko View 2 Pro	975 Points ∼12% +54%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1480 Points ∼19% +134%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (631 - 633, n=2)	632 Points ∼8% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=573)	1866 Points ∼23% +195%
Memory (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	778 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	2068 Points ∼64% +166%
Sharp B10	609 Points ∼19% -22%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	3239 Points ∼100% +316%
Wiko View 2 Pro	861 Points ∼27% +11%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1334 Points ∼41% +71%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (778 - 800, n=2)	789 Points ∼24% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=573)	1380 Points ∼43% +77%
System (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	1868 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	6137 Points ∼94% +229%
Sharp B10	1077 Points ∼17% -42%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	6506 Points ∼100% +248%
Wiko View 2 Pro	2894 Points ∼44% +55%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	3284 Points ∼50% +76%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (1407 - 1868, n=2)	1638 Points ∼25% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=573)	2752 Points ∼42% +47%
Overall (sort by value)
LG Q Stylus	882 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9	3110 Points ∼81% +253%
Sharp B10	253 Points ∼7% -71%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	3838 Points ∼100% +335%
Wiko View 2 Pro	1159 Points ∼30% +31%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	1570 Points ∼41% +78%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (855 - 882, n=2)	869 Points ∼23% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=577)	1365 Points ∼36% +55%

Legend

LG Q Stylus Mediatek MT6750S, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Sharp B10 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Wiko View 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Average Mediatek MT6750S

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (18.4 - 23832, n=479)	87.5 Points ∼100% +356%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)	75.959 Points ∼87% +296%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)	63.012 Points ∼72% +229%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)	27.615 Points ∼32% +44%
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)	22.257 Points ∼25% +16%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)	19.174 Points ∼22%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (18.7 - 19.2, n=2)	18.9 Points ∼22% -1%
Sharp B10 (Chrome 68)	12.743 Points ∼15% -34%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)	14663 Points ∼100% +322%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)	14514 Points ∼99% +318%
Average of class Smartphone (3126 - 43280, n=633)	6012 Points ∼41% +73%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)	5017 Points ∼34% +44%
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)	4001 Points ∼27% +15%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)	3474 Points ∼24%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (3422 - 3474, n=2)	3448 Points ∼24% -1%
Sharp B10 (Chrome 68)	2468 Points ∼17% -29%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Sharp B10 (Chrome 68)	18581 ms * ∼100% -41%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (13203 - 13671, n=2)	13437 ms * ∼72% -2%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)	13202.5 ms * ∼71%
Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67)	11455.8 ms * ∼62% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=653)	11004 ms * ∼59% +17%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)	10086 ms * ∼54% +24%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)	2713.6 ms * ∼15% +79%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)	2710 ms * ∼15% +79%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)	72 Points ∼100% +188%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 161, n=107)	63.7 Points ∼88% +155%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)	37 Points ∼51% +48%
LG Q Stylus (Chrome 69)	25 Points ∼35%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (19 - 25, n=2)	22 Points ∼31% -12%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)	223 Points ∼100% +214%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)	202 Points ∼91% +185%
Average of class Smartphone (106 - 362, n=321)	118 Points ∼53% +66%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)	106 Points ∼48% +49%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)	71 Points ∼32%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (70 - 71, n=2)	70.5 Points ∼32% -1%

* ... smaller is better

	LG Q Stylus	Samsung Galaxy Note 9	Sharp B10	Xiaomi Pocophone F1	Wiko View 2 Pro	Sony Xperia XA2 Plus	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		115%	-16%	83%	21%	30%	2%	4%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	63.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	66.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 5%	6.8 (Kingston 32GB) -89%	65.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	57.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -9%	67.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 5%	49 (3.4 - 87.1, n=128) -23%	47.9 (9.5 - 87.1, n=382) -25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	83.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -7%	9.83 (Kingston 32GB) -88%	85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	82.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	86.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	67.8 (8.2 - 96.5, n=128) -18%	66 (8.1 - 96.5, n=382) -21%
Random Write 4KB	12.07	21 74%	12.9 7%	17.81 48%	6.72 -44%	10.5 -13%	18.8 (0.75 - 77.3, n=171) 56%	18.9 (0.14 - 250, n=684) 57%
Random Read 4KB	31.45	134 326%	54.6 74%	101.01 221%	65.63 109%	77.43 146%	38.2 (3.59 - 117, n=171) 21%	43 (1.59 - 174, n=684) 37%
Sequential Write 256KB	121.4	196 61%	100.5 -17%	155.57 28%	194.28 60%	146.16 20%	95 (14.8 - 189, n=171) -22%	88.8 (2.99 - 388, n=684) -27%
Sequential Read 256KB	241.7	805 233%	280.7 16%	705.38 192%	265.37 10%	281.06 16%	234 (25.8 - 452, n=171) -3%	250 (12.1 - 1468, n=684) 3%

Asphalt 9: Legends
	Inställningar	Värde
	High Quality	16 fps
	Standard / low	23 fps

Arena of Valor
	Inställningar	Värde
	min	27 fps
	high HD	26 fps

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


30.8 °C	30.7 °C	33 °C
31.3 °C	31.7 °C	34.1 °C
31.8 °C	32.1 °C	32.8 °C

Max: 34.1 °C
Medel: 32 °C


30.8 °C	30.9 °C	31.3 °C
31.7 °C	31.9 °C	34.4 °C
31.5 °C	34.6 °C	35.3 °C

Max: 35.3 °C
Medel: 32.5 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 32.8 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

LG Q Stylus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 43.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (41.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Sony Xperia XA2 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.01 / 0.12 Watt
Låg belastning	0.69 / 1.7 / 1.73 Watt
Hög belastning	3.21 / 5.31 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	LG Q Stylus 3300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Note 9 4000 mAh	Sharp B10 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Pocophone F1 4000 mAh	Wiko View 2 Pro 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 3580 mAh	Average Mediatek MT6750S	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-53%	-42%	-26%	-1%	8%	-7%	-17%
Idle Minimum *	0.69	0.9 -30%	1 -45%	0.65 6%	0.64 7%	0.35 49%	0.845 (0.69 - 1, n=2) -22%	0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=714) -28%
Idle Average *	1.7	1.9 -12%	1.98 -16%	1.97 -16%	2.07 -22%	1.81 -6%	1.635 (1.57 - 1.7, n=2) 4%	1.735 (0.6 - 6.2, n=713) -2%
Idle Maximum *	1.73	3.7 -114%	2.5 -45%	2.01 -16%	2.13 -23%	1.83 -6%	1.685 (1.64 - 1.73, n=2) 3%	2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=714) -17%
Load Average *	3.21	5.3 -65%	5.3 -65%	4.29 -34%	2.69 16%	3.31 -3%	3.66 (3.21 - 4.1, n=2) -14%	4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=708) -26%
Load Maximum *	5.31	7.6 -43%	7.4 -39%	9.05 -70%	4.46 16%	4.97 6%	5.67 (5.31 - 6.02, n=2) -7%	5.85 (1.2 - 14.2, n=708) -10%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		25tim 29min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		6tim 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8tim 47min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		3tim 20min

	LG Q Stylus 3300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Note 9 4000 mAh	Sharp B10 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Pocophone F1 4000 mAh	Wiko View 2 Pro 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 3580 mAh
Battery Runtime		62%	116%	55%	105%	135%
Reader / Idle	1529	1687 10%		2088 37%		4682 206%
H.264	527	896 70%		936 78%		893 69%
WiFi v1.3	419	794 89%	903 116%	808 93%	857 105%	837 100%
Load	200	354 77%		220 10%		529 165%

För

+ stylus som får plats i höljet

+ skyddad mot stötar, vatten och damm

+ lätt

+ användarvänlig

Emot

- batteritiden

- USB 2.0

- ingen ac-WiFi

- baksidan är lätt att repa

Recension: LG Q Stylus. Recensionsex från LG Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

LG Q Stylus presenterar sig som en robust smartphone för användning till vardags. Den har bra prestanda och kan klara av en aning mer än grundläggande WhatsApp-användning och Internetsurfande. Den inkluderade stylusen ger enheten en för detta prisskikt unik funktion.

LG Q Stylus med sin stylus är unik för sitt prisskikt. Prestandan är bra men batteritiden kunde varit bättre.

Intresserade köpare bör känna till den mediokra batteritiden, som är en hel del kortare än konkurrerande enheter. Kamerorna är tillräckligt bra för en bild då och då men knappast mer. Q Stylus kan användas till spel, även om man inte får ha för höga förväntningar då laddningstiderna kan bli riktigt långa och bilduppdateringen kan bli långsam i mer krävande titlar.

LG Q Stylus - 2018-10-2610/26/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Design

87%

Tangentbord

69 / 75 → 91%

Mus

87%

Anslutningar

39 / 60 → 64%

Vikt

90%

Batteri

90%

Skärm

85%

Spelprestanda

15 / 63 → 23%

Programprestanda

40 / 70 → 57%

Temperatur

94%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

65 / 91 → 71%

Camera

63%

Medel

71%

80%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Test: LG Q Stylus Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

LG Q Stylus audio analysis

Sony Xperia XA2 Plus audio analysis

För

Emot

Pricecompare