Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: LG Q Stylus Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 458 cd/m²
Kontrast: 898:1 (Svärta: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.33
| LG Q Stylus IPS, 2160x1080, 6.20 | Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.40 | Sharp B10 IPS, 1440x720, 5.70 | Xiaomi Poco F1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18 | Wiko View 2 Pro IPS, 1528x720, 6.00 | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 4% | -1% | 17% | -32% | 39% | |
| Brightness middle | 458 | 499 9% | 560 22% | 489 7% | 562 23% | 597 30% |
| Brightness | 441 | 506 15% | 549 24% | 486 10% | 541 23% | 592 34% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 96 2% | 90 -4% | 93 -1% | 92 -2% | 92 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.51 | 0.63 -24% | 0.34 33% | 0.56 -10% | 0.32 37% | |
| Contrast | 898 | 889 -1% | 1438 60% | 1004 12% | 1866 108% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 4.62 -3% | 5.02 -12% | 3.8 16% | 7.9 -76% | 2.4 47% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.1 | 10.91 -54% | 8.71 -23% | 7.1 -0% | 15.7 -121% | 5.3 25% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.1 | 2.2 57% | 4.6 10% | 4.4 14% | 10.4 -104% | 3.4 33% |
| Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.103 105% | 2.216 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.02 109% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 7381 88% | 6115 106% | 7587 86% | 7213 90% | 8834 74% | 7172 91% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 67.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 37.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (3969 - 4101, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (16 - 16, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (17 - 17, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (6.7 - 6.8, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (7.1 - 7.1, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (4.5 - 4.5, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (4.7 - 4.7, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (52855 - 56626, n=2) | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| LG Q Stylus | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Sharp B10 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (44064 - 45829, n=2) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| LG Q Stylus (hrome 69) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (18.7 - 19.2, n=2) | |
| Sharp B10 (Chrome 68) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=212, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| LG Q Stylus (hrome 69) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (3422 - 3474, n=2) | |
| Sharp B10 (Chrome 68) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Sharp B10 (Chrome 68) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (13203 - 13671, n=2) | |
| LG Q Stylus (hrome 69) | |
| Wiko View 2 Pro (Chrome 67) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| LG Q Stylus (Chrome 69) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (19 - 25, n=2) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67) | |
| LG Q Stylus (hrome 69) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750S (70 - 71, n=2) | |
* ... smaller is better
| LG Q Stylus | Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | Sharp B10 | Xiaomi Poco F1 | Wiko View 2 Pro | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 115% | -16% | 83% | 21% | 30% | 13% | 1042% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 241.7 | 805 233% | 280.7 16% | 705 192% | 265.4 10% | 281.1 16% | 242 ? 0% | 1502 ? 521% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 121.4 | 196 61% | 100.5 -17% | 155.6 28% | 194.3 60% | 146.2 20% | 100.5 ? -17% | 1111 ? 815% |
| Random Read 4KB | 31.45 | 134 326% | 54.6 74% | 101 221% | 65.6 109% | 77.4 146% | 43.2 ? 37% | 247 ? 685% |
| Random Write 4KB | 12.07 | 21 74% | 12.9 7% | 17.81 48% | 6.72 -44% | 10.5 -13% | 22.4 ? 86% | 271 ? 2145% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.1 ? | 77 ? -7% | 9.83 ? -88% | 85.3 ? 3% | 82.3 ? -1% | 86 ? 3% | 71.8 ? -14% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 63.5 ? | 66.7 ? 5% | 6.8 ? -89% | 65.6 ? 3% | 57.8 ? -9% | 67 ? 6% | 52.9 ? -17% |
| Asphalt 9: Legends | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| High Quality | 16 fps | ||
| Standard / low | 23 fps | ||
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| min | 27 fps | ||
| high HD | 26 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
LG Q Stylus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 43.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (40.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.01 / 0.12 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.69 / 1.7 / 1.73 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
3.21 / 5.31 Watt |
    
| |
| LG Q Stylus 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note 9 4000 mAh | Sharp B10 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh | Wiko View 2 Pro 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 3580 mAh | Average Mediatek MT6750S | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -53% | -42% | -26% | -1% | 8% | -7% | -28% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.69 | 0.9 -30% | 1 -45% | 0.65 6% | 0.64 7% | 0.35 49% | 0.845 ? -22% | 0.897 ? -30% |
| Idle Average * | 1.7 | 1.9 -12% | 1.98 -16% | 1.97 -16% | 2.07 -22% | 1.81 -6% | 1.635 ? 4% | 1.452 ? 15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.73 | 3.7 -114% | 2.5 -45% | 2.01 -16% | 2.13 -23% | 1.83 -6% | 1.685 ? 3% | 1.629 ? 6% |
| Load Average * | 3.21 | 5.3 -65% | 5.3 -65% | 4.29 -34% | 2.69 16% | 3.31 -3% | 3.66 ? -14% | 5.55 ? -73% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.31 | 7.6 -43% | 7.4 -39% | 9.05 -70% | 4.46 16% | 4.97 6% | 5.67 ? -7% | 8.31 ? -56% |
* ... smaller is better
| LG Q Stylus 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note 9 4000 mAh | Sharp B10 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh | Wiko View 2 Pro 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 3580 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 62% | 116% | 55% | 105% | 135% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1529 | 1687 10% | 2088 37% | 4682 206% | ||
| H.264 | 527 | 896 70% | 936 78% | 893 69% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 419 | 794 89% | 903 116% | 808 93% | 857 105% | 837 100% |
| Load | 200 | 354 77% | 220 10% | 529 165% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
LG Q Stylus presenterar sig som en robust smartphone för användning till vardags. Den har bra prestanda och kan klara av en aning mer än grundläggande WhatsApp-användning och Internetsurfande. Den inkluderade stylusen ger enheten en för detta prisskikt unik funktion.
LG Q Stylus med sin stylus är unik för sitt prisskikt. Prestandan är bra men batteritiden kunde varit bättre.
Intresserade köpare bör känna till den mediokra batteritiden, som är en hel del kortare än konkurrerande enheter. Kamerorna är tillräckligt bra för en bild då och då men knappast mer. Q Stylus kan användas till spel, även om man inte får ha för höga förväntningar då laddningstiderna kan bli riktigt långa och bilduppdateringen kan bli långsam i mer krävande titlar.
LG Q Stylus
-
10/26/2018 v6(old)
Mike Wobker
Pricecompare
