Notebookcheck

Test: Huawei Mate 10 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Marcus Herbrich (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 01/20/2018

En av dom sista i sitt slag. Med sin Mate 10-smartphone i XXL-storlek går Kinesiska tillverkaren Huawei mot den aktuella trenden av skärmar med 2:1-bildförhållande. Hur står sig denna toppskikts-"phablet" och är den värd att importera?

Huawei Mate 10 (Mate 10 Serie)
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G72 MP12
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
5.9 tum 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixlar 498 PPI, Kapacitiv, Multi-Touch, LCD, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 51.9 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD-kort upp till 256 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Gravitationssensor, Ljussensor, Avståndssensor, Hall-brytare, Gyroskop, Barometer, Kompass, USB Typ-C, USB-OTG, Status-LED, Miracast
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM B2/B3/B5/B8, WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19, FDD-LTE B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B6/B7/B8/B9/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26, TD-LTE: B38/B39/B40/B41, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.2 x 150.5 x 77.8
Batteri
4000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix 20MP+12MP dual-kamera
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: dubbla högtalare, Tangentbord: Skärmtangentbord, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, USB-kabel, modulär nätadapter (CHN), (EU-kontakt), silikonskydd, EMUI version 8.0, 12 Månader Garanti, SAR-värde: 0.99 W/kg huvud, 1.29 W/kg kropp, fanless
Vikt
186 g, Strömförsörjning: 41 g
Pris
699 Kr

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
657 MBit/s ∼100% +115%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
503 MBit/s ∼77% +65%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
368 MBit/s ∼56% +21%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 MBit/s ∼51% +11%
Huawei Mate 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
305 MBit/s ∼46%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
259 MBit/s ∼39% -15%
HTC U Ultra
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s ∼38% -19%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
239 MBit/s ∼36% -22%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
703 MBit/s ∼100% +103%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
656 MBit/s ∼93% +89%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
653 MBit/s ∼93% +88%
Huawei Mate 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
347 MBit/s ∼49%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
279 MBit/s ∼40% -20%
HTC U Ultra
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB eMMC Flash
259 MBit/s ∼37% -25%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
225 MBit/s ∼32% -35%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
165 MBit/s ∼23% -52%
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Huawei Mate 10
GPS Huawei Mate 10
GPS Huawei Mate 10
bokeh...
bokeh...
...effects
...effects
HDR mode
HDR mode
photo mode
photo mode

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
716
cd/m²
703
cd/m²
678
cd/m²
710
cd/m²
704
cd/m²
672
cd/m²
681
cd/m²
677
cd/m²
686
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 716 cd/m² Medel: 691.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.68 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 704 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2514:1 (Svärta: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.34
Huawei Mate 10
IPS, 2560x1440, 5.9
Huawei Mate 9
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.9
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
HTC U Ultra
SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.7
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.3
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
LG V30
OLED, 2880x1440, 6
Google Pixel 2 XL
P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6
Screen
-45%
6%
-69%
-12%
9%
-58%
-20%
Brightness middle
704
696
-1%
629
-11%
470
-33%
530
-25%
560
-20%
432
-39%
415
-41%
Brightness
692
680
-2%
636
-8%
445
-36%
536
-23%
562
-19%
428
-38%
420
-39%
Brightness Distribution
94
93
-1%
94
0%
88
-6%
93
-1%
93
-1%
87
-7%
87
-7%
Black Level *
0.28
0.42
-50%
0.22
21%
Contrast
2514
1657
-34%
2136
-15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.4
4.3
-79%
1.7
29%
5.5
-129%
2.6
-8%
1.7
29%
4.18
-74%
2.7
-13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.2
9.4
-124%
3.6
14%
11.9
-183%
5.1
-21%
3.4
19%
8.53
-103%
4.3
-2%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.8
4.8
-71%
2.4
14%
7.6
-171%
2.7
4%
1.6
43%
5.3
-89%
3.3
-18%
Gamma
2.34 103%
2.33 103%
2.15 112%
2.2 109%
2.04 118%
2.13 113%
2.33 103%
2.36 102%
CCT
6423 101%
7255 90%
6337 103%
7454 87%
6206 105%
6435 101%
7487 87%
6787 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10287 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.8 ms rise
↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
178234 Points ∼77%
Huawei Mate 9
124087 Points ∼54% -30%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
177341 Points ∼77% -1%
HTC U Ultra
139017 Points ∼60% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
173997 Points ∼76% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼72% -7%
LG V30
173749 Points ∼75% -3%
Google Pixel 2 XL
166151 Points ∼72% -7%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
6904 Points ∼67%
Huawei Mate 9
6299 Points ∼61% -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6932 Points ∼67% 0%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points ∼51% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
5096 Points ∼49% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5195 Points ∼50% -25%
LG V30
5603 Points ∼54% -19%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6994 Points ∼68% +1%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
8337 Points ∼87%
Huawei Mate 9
7403 Points ∼77% -11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8439 Points ∼88% +1%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points ∼54% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6084 Points ∼63% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points ∼61% -30%
LG V30
6854 Points ∼71% -18%
Google Pixel 2 XL
8258 Points ∼86% -1%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
1253 Points ∼74%
Huawei Mate 9
1076 Points ∼63% -14%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points ∼73% -2%
HTC U Ultra
907 Points ∼53% -28%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
1235 Points ∼73% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼69% -7%
LG V30
1009 Points ∼59% -19%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1186 Points ∼70% -5%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
3928 Points ∼42%
Huawei Mate 9
3939 Points ∼43% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points ∼40% -7%
HTC U Ultra
4591 Points ∼50% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6121 Points ∼66% +56%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼66% +56%
LG V30
5949 Points ∼64% +51%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6142 Points ∼66% +56%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
4141 Points ∼94%
Huawei Mate 9
3850 Points ∼87% -7%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points ∼94% 0%
HTC U Ultra
1581 Points ∼36% -62%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3095 Points ∼70% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼71% -24%
LG V30
2091 Points ∼47% -50%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2927 Points ∼66% -29%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
5228 Points ∼51%
Huawei Mate 9
3616 Points ∼35% -31%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points ∼51% 0%
HTC U Ultra
2834 Points ∼28% -46%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
5308 Points ∼52% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼52% +2%
LG V30
4238 Points ∼41% -19%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5914 Points ∼58% +13%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
3210 Points ∼75%
Huawei Mate 9
2772 Points ∼64% -14%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points ∼73% -2%
HTC U Ultra
2078 Points ∼48% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3338 Points ∼77% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼77% +3%
LG V30
2702 Points ∼63% -16%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3351 Points ∼78% +4%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
6613 Points ∼23%
Huawei Mate 9
6445 Points ∼22% -3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points ∼24% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6744 Points ∼23% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼23% +1%
LG V30
6078 Points ∼21% -8%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6253 Points ∼22% -5%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
1883 Points ∼32%
Huawei Mate 9
1866 Points ∼31% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points ∼32% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2028 Points ∼34% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼34% +7%
LG V30
1900 Points ∼32% +1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1916 Points ∼32% +2%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
2887 Points ∼79%
Huawei Mate 9
2117 Points ∼58% -27%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points ∼78% -1%
HTC U Ultra
1763 Points ∼48% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2346 Points ∼64% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points ∼67% -15%
LG V30
2931 Points ∼80% +2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3028 Points ∼83% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
3033 Points ∼56%
Huawei Mate 9
2294 Points ∼43% -24%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points ∼53% -6%
HTC U Ultra
2405 Points ∼45% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2661 Points ∼49% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points ∼65% +15%
LG V30
3903 Points ∼72% +29%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3872 Points ∼72% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
2999 Points ∼63%
Huawei Mate 9
2240 Points ∼47% -25%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points ∼60% -5%
HTC U Ultra
2225 Points ∼47% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2584 Points ∼55% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points ∼67% +6%
LG V30
3635 Points ∼77% +21%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3646 Points ∼77% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
2852 Points ∼78%
Huawei Mate 9
2123 Points ∼58% -26%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points ∼80% +2%
HTC U Ultra
1646 Points ∼45% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2342 Points ∼64% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2465 Points ∼68% -14%
LG V30
2808 Points ∼77% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2995 Points ∼82% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
3522 Points ∼43%
Huawei Mate 9
2448 Points ∼30% -30%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points ∼41% -5%
HTC U Ultra
3807 Points ∼46% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3928 Points ∼48% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4786 Points ∼58% +36%
LG V30
5895 Points ∼71% +67%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5856 Points ∼71% +66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
3347 Points ∼52%
Huawei Mate 9
2367 Points ∼37% -29%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points ∼51% -3%
HTC U Ultra
2947 Points ∼46% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3414 Points ∼54% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3958 Points ∼62% +18%
LG V30
4738 Points ∼74% +42%
Google Pixel 2 XL
4831 Points ∼76% +44%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
21611 Points ∼27%
Huawei Mate 9
15104 Points ∼19% -30%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points ∼29% +5%
HTC U Ultra
21263 Points ∼27% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
22829 Points ∼29% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points ∼26% -3%
LG V30
14601 Points ∼18% -32%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20233 Points ∼26% -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
36231 Points ∼8%
Huawei Mate 9
35626 Points ∼8% -2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points ∼7% -6%
HTC U Ultra
33446 Points ∼7% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
36807 Points ∼8% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points ∼7% -9%
LG V30
55271 Points ∼12% +53%
Google Pixel 2 XL
54156 Points ∼11% +49%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
31605 Points ∼15%
Huawei Mate 9
27364 Points ∼13% -13%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points ∼15% -3%
HTC U Ultra
29668 Points ∼14% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
32399 Points ∼15% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points ∼14% -7%
LG V30
34139 Points ∼16% +8%
Google Pixel 2 XL
39456 Points ∼19% +25%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
97 fps ∼6%
Huawei Mate 9
80 fps ∼5% -18%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps ∼7% +15%
HTC U Ultra
74 fps ∼4% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
105 fps ∼6% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼6% +7%
LG V30
113 fps ∼7% +16%
Google Pixel 2 XL
112 fps ∼7% +15%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
60 fps ∼13%
Huawei Mate 9
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps ∼13% 0%
HTC U Ultra
46 fps ∼10% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
59 fps ∼13% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼13% -3%
LG V30
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼13% -2%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
53 fps ∼10%
Huawei Mate 9
34 fps ∼6% -36%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps ∼10% +2%
HTC U Ultra
26 fps ∼5% -51%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
51 fps ∼9% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼9% -6%
LG V30
59 fps ∼11% +11%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼11% +11%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
51 fps ∼14%
Huawei Mate 9
37 fps ∼10% -27%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps ∼15% +10%
HTC U Ultra
23 fps ∼6% -55%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
38 fps ∼10% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼10% -25%
LG V30
35 fps ∼10% -31%
Google Pixel 2 XL
35 fps ∼10% -31%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
38 fps ∼7%
Huawei Mate 9
24 fps ∼4% -37%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps ∼7% -3%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼2% -68%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
42 fps ∼8% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼8% +11%
LG V30
40 fps ∼7% +5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
41 fps ∼8% +8%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
37 fps ∼21%
Huawei Mate 9
28 fps ∼16% -24%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps ∼22% +3%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼7% -68%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
23 fps ∼13% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼13% -38%
LG V30
19 fps ∼11% -49%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20 fps ∼11% -46%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
21 fps ∼5%
Huawei Mate 9
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps ∼5% 0%
HTC U Ultra
15 fps ∼4% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
25 fps ∼6% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25 fps ∼6% +19%
LG V30
24 fps ∼6% +14%
Google Pixel 2 XL
24 fps ∼6% +14%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10
21 fps ∼18%
Huawei Mate 9
14 fps ∼12% -33%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps ∼19% +5%
HTC U Ultra
8.4 fps ∼7% -60%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
13 fps ∼11% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
13 fps ∼11% -38%
LG V30
13 fps ∼11% -38%
Google Pixel 2 XL
13 fps ∼11% -38%

Legend

 
Huawei Mate 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Google Pixel 2 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
69.57 Points ∼100% +19%
Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54)
68.6 Points ∼99% +17%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
64.709 Points ∼93% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
62.198 Points ∼89% +6%
Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63)
58.572 Points ∼84%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
56.63 Points ∼81% -3%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
52.9 Points ∼76% -10%
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
45.084 Points ∼65% -23%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
14050 Points ∼100% +25%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
13265 Points ∼94% +18%
Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54)
11897 Points ∼85% +6%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
11308 Points ∼80% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63)
11205 Points ∼80%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
10506 Points ∼75% -6%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
10406 Points ∼74% -7%
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
5511 Points ∼39% -51%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
4141 ms * ∼100% -12%
Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63)
3704.1 ms * ∼89%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
3630 ms * ∼88% +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
3590.6 ms * ∼87% +3%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
3434.1 ms * ∼83% +7%
Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54)
2733.7 ms * ∼66% +26%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2236.7 ms * ∼54% +40%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
1876.8 ms * ∼45% +49%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
194 Points ∼100% +24%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
159 Points ∼82% +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
158 Points ∼81% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63)
156 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
154 Points ∼79% -1%
Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54)
152 Points ∼78% -3%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
138 Points ∼71% -12%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Mate 10Huawei Mate 9Huawei Mate 10 ProHTC U UltraSamsung Galaxy Note 8Samsung Galaxy S8 PlusLG V30Google Pixel 2 XL
AndroBench 3-5
-46%
8%
-32%
-22%
-23%
-35%
-22%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
29.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-53%
67.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
8%
59.27 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
57.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
47.2
-25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
80.62 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
53.97 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-33%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
3%
67.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-16%
71.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-12%
62.8
-22%
Random Write 4KB
105.31
8.77
-92%
164.45
56%
13.7
-87%
14.55
-86%
15.27
-85%
10.21
-90%
17.84
-83%
Random Read 4KB
169.67
94.69
-44%
132.27
-22%
84.2
-50%
122.48
-28%
127.18
-25%
78.17
-54%
170.55
1%
Sequential Write 256KB
201.67
142.92
-29%
208.72
3%
164.7
-18%
205.85
2%
194.18
-4%
193.22
-4%
195.26
-3%
Sequential Read 256KB
790.33
594.23
-25%
732.46
-7%
423.9
-46%
796.96
1%
787.6
0%
669.48
-15%
760.14
-4%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InställningarVärde
 high29 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 InställningarVärde
 high30 fps
Hög belastning
 35.3 °C34.3 °C34.6 °C 
 34.6 °C33.7 °C34.3 °C 
 33.8 °C34 °C33.4 °C 
Max: 35.3 °C
Medel: 34.2 °C
31.7 °C33.6 °C35.8 °C
31.4 °C31.8 °C34 °C
31.6 °C31.9 °C32.4 °C
Max: 35.8 °C
Medel: 32.7 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  26.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 20.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.246.52532.945.53137.2374031.746.35039.6486328.341.48027.34310026.93512526.732.71602439.220020.948.425020.947.731519.549.240018.557.550017.558.563017.561.880015.760.5100015.863125016.666.1160015.871.7200015.473.3250015.574.731501671.3400015.873.750001673.1630016.372.8800016.370.91000016.2681250016.463.41600016.450.6SPL28.683.2N1.152.3median 16.4Huawei Mate 10median 63Delta2.111.330.929.330.926.229.126.228.627.828.629.832.629.828.826.728.82628.8262424.92424.824.724.830.722.130.729.220.829.236.120.136.141.719.841.748.72148.753.321.753.357.420.557.462.62162.662.118.462.165.71765.767.717.367.766.915.266.970.315.570.371.21571.27314.97378.515.178.581.314.681.373.914.673.973.114.673.17214.6726014.66048.214.648.28628.88657.31.257.3median 62.6HTC U Ultramedian 17median 62.612.2312.235.246.432.941.937.237.731.736.839.640.528.330.327.330.326.928.126.732.2244520.952.120.957.119.558.518.562.617.570.917.574.715.778.515.876.916.676.215.873.415.473.615.575.51679.915.880.11676.516.37416.374.916.271.416.458.216.44228.688.41.176.2median 16.4Google Pixel 2 XLmedian 73.42.110.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei Mate 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HTC U Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Google Pixel 2 XL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.22 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.89 / 2.31 / 2.38 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.87 / 9.16 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Mate 10
4000 mAh
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
HTC U Ultra
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
Power Consumption
6%
25%
-11%
28%
35%
29%
6%
Idle Minimum *
0.89
0.78
12%
0.85
4%
1
-12%
0.73
18%
0.68
24%
0.72
19%
1.28
-44%
Idle Average *
2.31
2.13
8%
1.15
50%
2.41
-4%
1.44
38%
1.13
51%
1.37
41%
1.87
19%
Idle Maximum *
2.38
2.17
9%
1.23
48%
2.46
-3%
1.53
36%
1.16
51%
1.41
41%
1.89
21%
Load Average *
4.87
6.32
-30%
4.12
15%
6.8
-40%
4.56
6%
4.69
4%
3.46
29%
3.73
23%
Load Maximum *
9.16
6.49
29%
8.42
8%
8.9
3%
5.09
44%
5.24
43%
7.83
15%
8.08
12%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
27tim 51min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14tim 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16tim 43min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 19min
Huawei Mate 10
4000 mAh
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
HTC U Ultra
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
Battery Runtime
-10%
12%
-25%
-29%
-10%
-3%
-12%
Reader / Idle
1671
1538
-8%
1744
4%
1568
-6%
1134
-32%
1565
-6%
1914
15%
1706
2%
H.264
1003
947
-6%
929
-7%
605
-40%
662
-34%
742
-26%
822
-18%
672
-33%
WiFi v1.3
865
758
-12%
818
-5%
546
-37%
474
-45%
736
-15%
774
-11%
581
-33%
Load
259
219
-15%
398
54%
214
-17%
246
-5%
275
6%
267
3%
302
17%

För

+ enastående design & känns riktigt bra
+ väldigt bra IPS-skärm
+ QHD-upplösning (16:9)
+ blir inte särskilt varm
+ utmärkt batteritid
+ enastående prestanda

Emot

- högt SAR-värde
- kameramjukvaran har brister
- ingen trådlös laddning
- Bluetooth 4.2
- WLAN kunde varit snabbare
- endast certifierad för IP-53
- (tillgänglighet)
Huawei Mate 10, courtesy of Trading Shenzhen.
Huawei Mate 10, courtesy of Trading Shenzhen.

Huawei Mate 10 är en enastående smartphone. Dom få mindre krångligheterna – den (åtminstone i vårt fall) svajiga volymknappen, avsaknaden av en IP 67-certifiering, den kontextbaserade ljusstyrke-justeringen och efterbehandlingen för foton – förtar egentligen inte helhetskonceptet.

Den "vanliga" Mate 10 är onekligen den egentliga efterföljaren till den populära Mate 9. Som en av dom mest framstående sucéerna för 2017 så är denna smartphone verkligen värd att överväga – trots det faktum att den inte finns tillgänglig i Tyskland.

Vi måste erkänna att vi har kämpat med att förstå varför Huawei har valt att inte sälja den ordinarie Mate 10 i Tyskalnd och många andra länder. Denna "phablet" har en del fördelar framför Pro-versionen: Mate 10 kommer med en 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning, använder QHD-upplösning och tillåter utökning av lagringen med SD-kort. På så sätt så borde den tilltala en bredare publik av användare. Tack vare 16:9-förhållandet så är denna 6-tums phablet ett verkligt alternativ i toppskikts-segmentet.

Huawei Mate 10 - 01/02/2018 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Design
89%
Tangentbord
74 / 75 → 99%
Mus
96%
Anslutningar
67 / 60 → 100%
Vikt
89%
Batteri
97%
Skärm
91%
Spelprestanda
63 / 63 → 100%
Programprestanda
71 / 70 → 100%
Temperatur
93%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
74 / 91 → 81%
Camera
85%
Medel
84%
91%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Huawei Mate 10 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Marcus Herbrich, 2018-01-20 (Update: 2018-01-20)