Notebookcheck

Test: Honor Play Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Wimmer (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 09/24/2018

"Play with honor." Huaweis första speltelefon kommer till det västra halvklotet: Även om Honor Play inte riktigt ser ut som en spelenhet vill den imponera på gamers med sitt låga pris. Vi tar en titt på om detta är en fördel eller en nackdel och huruvida telefonen har tillräckligt med kraft för moderna spel.

Honor Play
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G72 MP12
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
6.3 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 409 PPI, kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 54 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 256GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: accelerometer, gyroskop, närhetssensor, kompass, USB-C
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/900/2100), LTE (1/3/5/7/8/20/38/39/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.5 x 157.9 x 74.3
Batteri
3750 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 4.2
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix Dual: f/​2.2, Fasdetektions-autofokus (AF), LED-blixt, video @2160p/​30fps (huvudkamera); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, skärpedjup (sekundär kamera)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.0, video @1080p
Övrigt
Högtalare: monohögtalare på enhetens nedre kant, Tangentbord: virtuellt tangentbord, AC-adapter, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Skyddsfodral i silikon, 24 Månader Garanti, LTE Cat. 18 (1.2 GBit/s nedladdning, 250 MBit/s uppladdning); SAR-värde: 1.10 W/kg (kropp)
Vikt
176 g, Strömförsörjning: 68 g
Pris
350 Kr

 

Honor Play
Honor Play
Honor Play
Honor Play
Honor Play
Honor Play

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
665 MBit/s ∼100% +254%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s ∼37% +31%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
232 MBit/s ∼35% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=270)
196 MBit/s ∼29% +4%
Honor Play
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
188 MBit/s ∼28%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
116 MBit/s ∼17% -38%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
661 MBit/s ∼100% +248%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
307 MBit/s ∼46% +62%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
237 MBit/s ∼36% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=270)
191 MBit/s ∼29% +1%
Honor Play
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
190 MBit/s ∼29%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
117 MBit/s ∼18% -38%
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Skog
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Skog
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
GPS Honor Play – Översikt
GPS Honor Play – Översikt
GPS Honor Play – Skog
GPS Honor Play – Skog
GPS Honor Play – Bro
GPS Honor Play – Bro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
396
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
403
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 445 cd/m² Medel: 425.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.12 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 435 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1115:1 (Svärta: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.89 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
96.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.251
Honor Play
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Razer Phone 2017
IGZO LCD, 120 Hz, Wide Color Gamut, 1440x2560, 5.72
Xiaomi Black Shark
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6
Nokia 7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Screen
12%
-22%
-34%
9%
Brightness middle
435
436
0%
549
26%
446
3%
458
5%
Brightness
426
417
-2%
541
27%
451
6%
463
9%
Brightness Distribution
89
92
3%
95
7%
93
4%
92
3%
Black Level *
0.39
0.16
59%
0.42
-8%
0.22
44%
Contrast
1115
2725
144%
1307
17%
2082
87%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.89
3.88
-34%
6.08
-110%
6.58
-128%
4
-38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.03
7.96
-32%
10.69
-77%
11.94
-98%
7.4
-23%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.1
5.8
-41%
6.6
-61%
3.6
12%
4.7
-15%
Gamma
2.251 98%
2.45 90%
2.305 95%
2.199 100%
2.19 100%
CCT
7408 88%
7657 85%
8399 77%
7116 91%
7425 88%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 83.3 Hz ≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 83.3 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 83.3 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8811 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor Play
178745 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Black Shark
230642 Points ∼100% +29%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
93813 Points ∼41% -48%
Nokia 7 Plus
117165 Points ∼51% -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (173653 - 179709, n=7)
177335 Points ∼77% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 232931, n=359)
72132 Points ∼31% -60%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor Play
152773 Points ∼53%
Razer Phone 2017
208972 Points ∼72% +37%
Xiaomi Black Shark
290397 Points ∼100% +90%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
115656 Points ∼40% -24%
Nokia 7 Plus
141701 Points ∼49% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (152773 - 212278, n=5)
195813 Points ∼67% +28%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=138)
109082 Points ∼38% -29%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Honor Play
6293 Points ∼76%
Razer Phone 2017
7046 Points ∼85% +12%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8309 Points ∼100% +32%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
5640 Points ∼68% -10%
Nokia 7 Plus
6077 Points ∼73% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6293 - 7046, n=7)
6840 Points ∼82% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (4748 - 8601, n=225)
4439 Points ∼53% -29%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor Play
9326 Points ∼100%
Razer Phone 2017
7968 Points ∼85% -15%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
6457 Points ∼69% -31%
Nokia 7 Plus
6825 Points ∼73% -27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (8115 - 9326, n=7)
8536 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (4147 - 10571, n=389)
4739 Points ∼51% -49%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Honor Play
1091 Points ∼88%
Razer Phone 2017
1225 Points ∼99% +12%
Xiaomi Black Shark
1243 Points ∼100% +14%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1052 Points ∼85% -4%
Nokia 7 Plus
1101 Points ∼89% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1091 - 1316, n=7)
1238 Points ∼100% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=466)
678 Points ∼55% -38%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor Play
2231 Points ∼36%
Razer Phone 2017
6273 Points ∼100% +181%
Xiaomi Black Shark
5846 Points ∼93% +162%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1625 Points ∼26% -27%
Nokia 7 Plus
2298 Points ∼37% +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2231 - 4397, n=7)
3647 Points ∼58% +63%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15875, n=466)
1622 Points ∼26% -27%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor Play
2417 Points ∼59%
Razer Phone 2017
4085 Points ∼100% +69%
Xiaomi Black Shark
2871 Points ∼70% +19%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2208 Points ∼54% -9%
Nokia 7 Plus
2503 Points ∼61% +4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2417 - 4276, n=7)
3855 Points ∼94% +59%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=466)
1157 Points ∼28% -52%
System (sort by value)
Honor Play
3795 Points ∼53%
Razer Phone 2017
5660 Points ∼80% +49%
Xiaomi Black Shark
7105 Points ∼100% +87%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
4628 Points ∼65% +22%
Nokia 7 Plus
4976 Points ∼70% +31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3795 - 5965, n=7)
5301 Points ∼75% +40%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=466)
2351 Points ∼33% -38%
Overall (sort by value)
Honor Play
2174 Points ∼60%
Razer Phone 2017
3651 Points ∼100% +68%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3489 Points ∼96% +60%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2044 Points ∼56% -6%
Nokia 7 Plus
2369 Points ∼65% +9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2174 - 3374, n=7)
3092 Points ∼85% +42%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=470)
1178 Points ∼32% -46%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Honor Play
8454 Points ∼62%
Razer Phone 2017
7931 Points ∼58% -6%
Xiaomi Black Shark
13620 Points ∼100% +61%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
4501 Points ∼33% -47%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (8025 - 9015, n=5)
8540 Points ∼63% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14417, n=164)
4116 Points ∼30% -51%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor Play
6673 Points ∼79%
Razer Phone 2017
6742 Points ∼80% +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8453 Points ∼100% +27%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
4941 Points ∼58% -26%
Nokia 7 Plus
5867 Points ∼69% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6557 - 6792, n=7)
6684 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 11598, n=213)
4133 Points ∼49% -38%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor Play
1904 Points ∼78%
Razer Phone 2017
1942 Points ∼80% +2%
Xiaomi Black Shark
2437 Points ∼100% +28%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1330 Points ∼55% -30%
Nokia 7 Plus
1646 Points ∼68% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1883 - 1922, n=7)
1900 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=214)
1218 Points ∼50% -36%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor Play
2827 Points ∼83%
Razer Phone 2017
3157 Points ∼93% +12%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3408 Points ∼100% +21%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2327 Points ∼68% -18%
Nokia 7 Plus
2749 Points ∼81% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2582 - 2931, n=7)
2831 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 3669, n=319)
1572 Points ∼46% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor Play
3018 Points ∼58%
Razer Phone 2017
4049 Points ∼78% +34%
Xiaomi Black Shark
5220 Points ∼100% +73%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
815 Points ∼16% -73%
Nokia 7 Plus
1161 Points ∼22% -62%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2844 - 3040, n=7)
2991 Points ∼57% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5220, n=319)
1103 Points ∼21% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor Play
2973 Points ∼64%
Razer Phone 2017
3810 Points ∼82% +28%
Xiaomi Black Shark
4668 Points ∼100% +57%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
953 Points ∼20% -68%
Nokia 7 Plus
1332 Points ∼29% -55%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2850 - 2999, n=7)
2953 Points ∼63% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=327)
1054 Points ∼23% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor Play
2832 Points ∼82%
Razer Phone 2017
3092 Points ∼90% +9%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3443 Points ∼100% +22%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2337 Points ∼68% -17%
Nokia 7 Plus
2734 Points ∼79% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1906 - 2896, n=7)
2708 Points ∼79% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 3642, n=350)
1471 Points ∼43% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor Play
3734 Points ∼45%
Razer Phone 2017
6127 Points ∼74% +64%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8312 Points ∼100% +123%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1333 Points ∼16% -64%
Nokia 7 Plus
1895 Points ∼23% -49%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1954 - 3734, n=7)
3289 Points ∼40% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (104 - 8312, n=350)
1499 Points ∼18% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor Play
3487 Points ∼55%
Razer Phone 2017
5030 Points ∼80% +44%
Xiaomi Black Shark
6324 Points ∼100% +81%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1474 Points ∼23% -58%
Nokia 7 Plus
2035 Points ∼32% -42%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1943 - 3487, n=7)
3136 Points ∼50% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (127 - 6378, n=358)
1279 Points ∼20% -63%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor Play
20035 Points ∼64%
Razer Phone 2017
21521 Points ∼69% +7%
Xiaomi Black Shark
31384 Points ∼100% +57%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
16939 Points ∼54% -15%
Nokia 7 Plus
20085 Points ∼64% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (14556 - 23046, n=7)
20770 Points ∼66% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (7103 - 36762, n=505)
12408 Points ∼40% -38%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor Play
34836 Points ∼42%
Razer Phone 2017
58360 Points ∼71% +68%
Xiaomi Black Shark
82423 Points ∼100% +137%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
20908 Points ∼25% -40%
Nokia 7 Plus
29333 Points ∼36% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (22429 - 36231, n=7)
32542 Points ∼39% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 160199, n=505)
16687 Points ∼20% -52%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor Play
29924 Points ∼49%
Razer Phone 2017
42278 Points ∼70% +41%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60543 Points ∼100% +102%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
19873 Points ∼33% -34%
Nokia 7 Plus
26610 Points ∼44% -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (20022 - 31605, n=7)
28896 Points ∼48% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=506)
14150 Points ∼23% -53%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor Play
115 fps ∼76%
Razer Phone 2017
117 fps ∼77% +2%
Xiaomi Black Shark
151 fps ∼100% +31%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
36 fps ∼24% -69%
Nokia 7 Plus
50 fps ∼33% -57%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (97 - 125, n=7)
117 fps ∼77% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=529)
29.2 fps ∼19% -75%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor Play
60 fps ∼76%
Razer Phone 2017
79 fps ∼100% +32%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60 fps ∼76% 0%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
35 fps ∼44% -42%
Nokia 7 Plus
48 fps ∼61% -20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (59 - 60, n=7)
59.6 fps ∼75% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=532)
24.1 fps ∼31% -60%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor Play
62 fps ∼76%
Razer Phone 2017
43 fps ∼52% -31%
Xiaomi Black Shark
82 fps ∼100% +32%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
16 fps ∼20% -74%
Nokia 7 Plus
23 fps ∼28% -63%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (53 - 66, n=7)
59.1 fps ∼72% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 115, n=452)
15.5 fps ∼19% -75%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor Play
55 fps ∼93%
Razer Phone 2017
40 fps ∼68% -27%
Xiaomi Black Shark
59 fps ∼100% +7%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
15 fps ∼25% -73%
Nokia 7 Plus
22 fps ∼37% -60%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (50 - 56, n=7)
53.9 fps ∼91% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (4.4 - 115, n=454)
15.2 fps ∼26% -72%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor Play
39 fps ∼65%
Razer Phone 2017
21 fps ∼35% -46%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60 fps ∼100% +54%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
10 fps ∼17% -74%
Nokia 7 Plus
14 fps ∼23% -64%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (21 - 39, n=7)
36 fps ∼60% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 69.3, n=316)
13.3 fps ∼22% -66%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor Play
31 fps ∼58%
Razer Phone 2017
22 fps ∼42% -29%
Xiaomi Black Shark
53 fps ∼100% +71%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
9.8 fps ∼18% -68%
Nokia 7 Plus
15 fps ∼28% -52%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (31 - 39, n=7)
35.9 fps ∼68% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=318)
13.2 fps ∼25% -57%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor Play
20 fps ∼57%
Razer Phone 2017
25 fps ∼71% +25%
Xiaomi Black Shark
35 fps ∼100% +75%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
6.3 fps ∼18% -68%
Nokia 7 Plus
8.3 fps ∼24% -58%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (20 - 23, n=7)
21.7 fps ∼62% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 40, n=248)
9.16 fps ∼26% -54%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor Play
19 fps ∼61%
Razer Phone 2017
15 fps ∼48% -21%
Xiaomi Black Shark
31 fps ∼100% +63%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
6 fps ∼19% -68%
Nokia 7 Plus
9.1 fps ∼29% -52%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (19 - 23, n=7)
21.1 fps ∼68% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 50, n=251)
8.35 fps ∼27% -56%

Legend

 
Honor Play HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Razer Phone 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65)
63.3 Points ∼100% +91%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
53.89 Points ∼85% +63%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (33.1 - 58.6, n=7)
50.6 Points ∼80% +53%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
44.587 Points ∼70% +35%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=387)
35.1 Points ∼55% +6%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)
33.094 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Points ∼0% -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
13663 Points ∼100% +104%
Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65)
12600 Points ∼92% +88%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
10945 Points ∼80% +64%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6692 - 11584, n=7)
9864 Points ∼72% +47%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
8519 Points ∼62% +27%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)
6692 Points ∼49%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=523)
5237 Points ∼38% -22%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=542)
11780 ms * ∼100% -89%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)
6220.7 ms * ∼53%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
4820 ms * ∼41% +23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3591 - 6221, n=7)
4466 ms * ∼38% +28%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
3937.3 ms * ∼33% +37%
Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65)
3476 ms * ∼30% +44%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
2287 ms * ∼19% +63%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
246 Points ∼100% +107%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
168 Points ∼68% +41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (119 - 182, n=7)
162 Points ∼66% +36%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
154 Points ∼63% +29%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)
119 Points ∼48%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=260)
104 Points ∼42% -13%

* ... smaller is better

Honor PlayRazer Phone 2017Xiaomi Black SharkMotorola Moto Z3 PlayNokia 7 PlusAverage 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-22%
-12%
-31%
-37%
-24%
-61%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
71.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
52.5
-27%
62.7
-13%
62.31
-13%
50.5 (17.1 - 71.9, n=23)
-30%
44.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=294)
-38%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.4
-4%
83.7
1%
82.21
-1%
66.9 (18 - 85.3, n=23)
-19%
62.6 (8.2 - 96.5, n=294)
-24%
Random Write 4KB
155.5
14.3
-91%
114.1
-27%
84.1
-46%
19.62
-87%
46.8 (8.77 - 156, n=30)
-70%
14.1 (0.14 - 164, n=575)
-91%
Random Read 4KB
142.4
142.5
0%
127.2
-11%
60.6
-57%
54.65
-62%
134 (78.2 - 173, n=30)
-6%
35.7 (1.59 - 173, n=575)
-75%
Sequential Write 256KB
188.3
202.5
8%
199.6
6%
182.5
-3%
211.6
12%
191 (133 - 214, n=30)
1%
74.7 (2.99 - 228, n=575)
-60%
Sequential Read 256KB
894.5
732.3
-18%
741.5
-17%
271.7
-70%
283.12
-68%
730 (529 - 895, n=30)
-18%
218 (12.1 - 895, n=575)
-76%
PUBG Mobile
 InställningarVärde
 Smooth32 fps
 HD32 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 InställningarVärde
 min55 fps
 high HD54 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Hög belastning
 41.3 °C38.3 °C39.6 °C 
 41.5 °C38.6 °C40.2 °C 
 40.2 °C38.4 °C39.5 °C 
Max: 41.5 °C
Medel: 39.7 °C
36.1 °C37.8 °C39 °C
36.6 °C38.3 °C39.2 °C
37.1 °C38.8 °C39.7 °C
Max: 39.7 °C
Medel: 38.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  45.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.728.42533.934.53147.648.94031.236.7503837.76327.130.78027.130.310024.624.512520.620.516018.829.920018.544.925017.749.93151750.840016.555.850016.955.563014.454.28001460.4100013.562.1125013.766.7160013.969.5200012.770.1250012.771.7315012.771.7400012.569.9500011.968.2630011.465800011.562.81000011.662.81250011.561.71600011.449.4SPL67.725.780.2N21.20.742.6median 13.7Honor Playmedian 61.7Delta2.5929.525.929.526.427.726.426.526.526.526.628.326.625.525.225.523.922.723.926.523.626.533.623.333.640.230.540.245.821.145.852.420.652.455.322.955.357.921.157.960.921.560.964.822.364.869.117.569.171.520.171.569.719.969.77018.27069.51669.570.715.770.771.614.871.669.614.569.666.914.266.968146867.813.867.868.913.968.966.51466.562.71462.758.613.858.681.229.381.251.51.251.5median 66.9Razer Phone 2017median 17.5median 66.97.13.57.1hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor Play audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Razer Phone 2017 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.6 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.4 / 2.6 / 4.3 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 6.5 / 8.2 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor Play
3750 mAh
Razer Phone 2017
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
3000 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
24%
27%
30%
33%
26%
39%
Idle Minimum *
1.4
0.83
41%
0.8
43%
1.3
7%
0.65
54%
0.974 (0.67 - 1.4, n=7)
30%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=603)
37%
Idle Average *
2.6
2.11
19%
1.5
42%
2
23%
1.76
32%
2.04 (1.15 - 2.6, n=7)
22%
1.718 (0.6 - 6.2, n=602)
34%
Idle Maximum *
4.3
2.24
48%
2.3
47%
2.7
37%
1.78
59%
2.33 (1.23 - 4.3, n=7)
46%
1.987 (0.74 - 6.6, n=603)
54%
Load Average *
6.5
4.94
24%
4.8
26%
3.7
43%
4.47
31%
4.88 (2.47 - 6.5, n=7)
25%
4.02 (0.8 - 10.8, n=597)
38%
Load Maximum *
8.2
9.08
-11%
10.1
-23%
5.1
38%
9.13
-11%
7.61 (2.49 - 9.16, n=7)
7%
5.68 (1.2 - 14.2, n=597)
31%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
28tim 43min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11tim 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12tim 39min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 24min
Honor Play
3750 mAh
Razer Phone 2017
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
3000 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Battery Runtime
7%
6%
-15%
-9%
Reader / Idle
1723
1753
2%
1245
-28%
1703
-1%
H.264
759
747
-2%
648
-15%
706
-7%
WiFi v1.3
710
762
7%
711
0%
595
-16%
672
-5%
Load
204
253
24%
199
-2%
158
-23%

För

+ bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda
+ diskret hölje
+ kameran tar skarpa bilder
+ skärmen har bra färgåtergivning
+ exakt tryckkänslig skärm
+ snabb lagring
+ bra batteritid

Emot

- telefonen blir överhettad vid kraftig belastning
- fuskar på prestandatester
- överdrivna färger i kamerans AI-läge
- förinstallerad bloatware
- långsamt WiFi
Recenseras: Honor Play. Recensionsex från Honor Germany.
Recenseras: Honor Play. Recensionsex från Honor Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Honor Play är inte gjord för hardcore-gamers som vill få ut så många bildrutor som möjligt ur sin smartphone. Den riktar sig åt en större grupp av mobila användare som letar efter en snygg enhet som även låter dem spelar krävande spel. Honor Play har lyckats uppfylla dess krav: Den har tillräckligt med prestanda, skärmen har god färgprecision, det finns ingen fördröjning när den reagerar på inmatning och den har lång batteritid.

Men förvänta dig inte allt för mycket från funktionerna som luktar marknadsföring: 3D-ljudeffekten för hörlurar är ganska kul, precis som vibrationsfunktionen i PUBG. Det sistnämnda är dock begränsat till enstaka spel för tillfället. Det återstår att se om fler spel kommer stödja funktionen i framtiden. Mjukvaran avger inte heller någon stark spelkänsla - Xiaomi och Razer visade mycket tydligare att det rörde sig om en dedikerad speltelefon.

Honor Play är en diskret spelsmartphone för genomsnittliga behov med ett bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda.

Totalt sett lämnar detta oss med en riktigt bra mittenskikts-telefon som finns att köpa till ett bra pris, precis som förväntat från Honor. Alla gamers med vanliga krav som då och då vill spela ett mer krävande spel men inte bryr sig allt för mycket om grafiken bör bli nöjda med den här enheten. Om du letar efter ett 120 Hz-läge eller en flashigare speldesign får du leta lite mer. Å andra sidan är Honor Play mer diskret. Om du vill spel spel under ett tråkigt möte kan Honor Play vara ett bra val.

Honor Play - 09/14/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Design
79%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
91%
Anslutningar
42 / 60 → 70%
Vikt
90%
Batteri
94%
Skärm
87%
Spelprestanda
63 / 63 → 100%
Programprestanda
65 / 70 → 93%
Temperatur
80%
Ljudnivå
100%
Camera
76%
Medel
78%
86%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Honor Play Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Florian Wimmer, 2018-09-24 (Update: 2018-09-24)