Notebookcheck

Test: HP Omen 15 - Stark AMD-processor får Intel att darra (Sammanfattning)

Full av överraskningar. AMD-versionen av HP Omen 15 får poäng för kraftfulla komponenter och ett pris som ser rimligt ut på pappret. I konfigurationen vi testar får ett GeForce RTX 2060 sällskap av en Ryzen 8 4800H. Här får du reda på huruvida kylsystemet hänger med och vilka andra styrkor och svagheter 15-tummaren har.
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen)
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 8 x 2.9 - 4.2 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL2 / Sustained, Renoir (Zen 2)
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile - 6144 MB, Kärna: 960 MHz, Minne: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 452.41, Optimus
Minne
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, Dubbla kanaler
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, BOE0852, IPS, Full HD, glansig: nej, 60 Hz
Moderkort
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Hårddisk
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, 512 GB 
, M.2 NVMe
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC245 @ AMD K17.6 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio Controller
Anslutningar
4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad (Headset/Mikrofon), Kortläsare: SD
Nätverk
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 23 x 358 x 240
Batteri
70.9 Wh Litiumjon, 6 Celler
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2.0 Bang & Olufsen, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 200 W Nätadapter, Installationsmanual, Command Center, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.16 kg, Strömförsörjning: 525 g
Pris
1260 EUR
Länkar
HP hemsida
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83 %
01/2021
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		2.2 kg23 mm15.60"1920x1080
82 %
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		2 kg19.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
83 %
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		2.2 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
82 %
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		2.1 kg19.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
84 %
Aorus 5 KB
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		2.1 kg28 mm15.60"1920x1080
83 %
07/2020
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		2.5 kg26.1 mm15.60"1920x1080

Storleksjämförelse

❌
363.1 mm 259.6 mm 26.1 mm 2.5 kg361 mm 258 mm 28 mm 2.1 kg359 mm 256 mm 24.9 mm 2.2 kg363 mm 254 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg358 mm 240 mm 23 mm 2.2 kg359.8 mm 245.8 mm 19.9 mm 2 kg

Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 218, n=307)
94 MB/s ∼100% +32%
Aorus 5 KB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼81% +7%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
71 MB/s ∼76%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36 MB/s ∼38% -49%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=305)
111 MB/s ∼100% +26%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼79%
Aorus 5 KB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼77% -2%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37 MB/s ∼33% -58%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1640 MBit/s ∼100% +203%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1380 MBit/s ∼84% +155%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1380 MBit/s ∼84% +155%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
880 (772min - 916max) MBit/s ∼54% +62%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1670, n=365)
755 MBit/s ∼46% +39%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
630 (571min - 641max) MBit/s ∼38% +16%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
542 MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1380 MBit/s ∼100% +115%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1230 MBit/s ∼89% +92%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1220 MBit/s ∼88% +90%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1645, n=365)
696 MBit/s ∼50% +8%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
662 (553min - 769max) MBit/s ∼48% +3%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
642 MBit/s ∼47%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
566 (37min - 647max) MBit/s ∼41% -12%
ColorChecker
11.3 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
22 ∆E
24 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
17 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
15 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Omen 15-en0375ng: 17.92 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 27.71 ∆E
279
cd/m²		269
cd/m²		268
cd/m²
274
cd/m²		297
cd/m²		268
cd/m²
260
cd/m²		286
cd/m²		271
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
BOE0852
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 297 cd/m² Medel: 274.7 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 297 cd/m²
Kontrast: 900:1 (Svärta: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.54 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 4.66
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
58% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.066
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
BOE0852, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
LM156LF-1F02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
BOE08FB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Aorus 5 KB
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
BOE CQ NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Response Times
61%
-14%
4%
50%
16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
30.4 (16.4, 14)
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
68%
34 (16, 18)
-12%
29.2 (14.4, 14.8)
4%
14.4 (7.6, 6.8)
53%
26 (12, 14)
14%
Response Time Black / White *
20.8 (11.6, 9.2)
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
54%
24 (13, 11)
-15%
20 (9.6, 10.4)
4%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
46%
17 (8, 9)
18%
PWM Frequency
200 (99)
Screen
0%
1%
-8%
33%
0%
Brightness middle
297
312
5%
280
-6%
279
-6%
318
7%
301
1%
Brightness
275
290
5%
254
-8%
257
-7%
298
8%
277
1%
Brightness Distribution
88
87
-1%
88
0%
89
1%
87
-1%
77
-12%
Black Level *
0.33
0.2
39%
0.15
55%
0.31
6%
0.3
9%
0.26
21%
Contrast
900
1560
73%
1867
107%
900
0%
1060
18%
1158
29%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.54
4.84
-7%
5.89
-30%
5.84
-29%
2.49
45%
5.12
-13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
18.92
13.85
27%
19
-0%
21.8
-15%
5.06
73%
8.86
53%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.66
1.77
62%
4.79
-3%
4.54
3%
1.53
67%
4.88
-5%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.1
9
-329%
4.08
-94%
3.1
-48%
1.6
24%
3.47
-65%
Gamma
2.066 106%
2.105 105%
2.33 94%
2.116 104%
2.211 100%
2.37 93%
CCT
6291 103%
8099 80%
7303 89%
6577 99%
6714 97%
7062 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
40
68
70%
37
-7%
41
3%
65
63%
37
-7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
58
92
59%
58
0%
59
2%
89
53%
57
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
31% / 10%
-7% / -1%
-2% / -6%
42% / 36%
8% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450146014701480149015001510152015301540155015601570158015901600161016201630164016501660167016801690170017101720173017401750176017701780179018001810182018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930Tooltip
HP Omen 15-en0375ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1886 (1812.99-1909.31)
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1866 (1840.26-1926.13)
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1753 (1601.6-1850.14)
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1209 (1180.53-1317.18)
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1145 (1045.12-1193.85)
Cinebench R15 | Blender 2.79 | 7-Zip 18.03 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 5.3 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
203 Points ∼100% +8%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
199 Points ∼98% +6%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
188 Points ∼93%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
187 Points ∼92% -1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
187 Points ∼92% -1%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
186 Points ∼92% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 220, n=637)
163 Points ∼80% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1926 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1909 (1812.99min - 1909.31max) Points ∼99%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1850 Points ∼96% -3%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
1317 (1180.53min - 1317.18max) Points ∼68% -31%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
1194 (1045.12min - 1193.85max) Points ∼62% -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=645)
938 Points ∼49% -51%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
898 Points ∼47% -53%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
485.9 Seconds * ∼100% -88%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
388 Seconds * ∼80% -50%
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 901, n=104)
380 Seconds * ∼78% -47%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
372 Seconds * ∼77% -44%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
262.5 Seconds * ∼54% -1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
259 Seconds * ∼53%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
255 Seconds * ∼52% +2%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
50075 MIPS ∼100%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
48326 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
45679 MIPS ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (3034 - 75612, n=105)
37369 MIPS ∼75% -25%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
35797 MIPS ∼71% -29%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
34772 MIPS ∼69% -31%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
24635 MIPS ∼49% -51%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
5253 MIPS ∼100% +13%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
5052 MIPS ∼96% +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2480 - 5811, n=105)
4954 MIPS ∼94% +7%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
4903 MIPS ∼93% +6%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4666 MIPS ∼89% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4664 MIPS ∼89% +1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4638 MIPS ∼88%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
486 Points ∼100%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
485 Points ∼100% 0%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
476 Points ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
475 Points ∼98% -2%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
473 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
459 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 524, n=148)
453 Points ∼93% -7%
CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4435 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4380 Points ∼99%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4257 Points ∼96% -3%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
3075 Points ∼69% -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 6321, n=149)
3027 Points ∼68% -31%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
2991 Points ∼67% -32%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
2217 Points ∼50% -49%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
8073 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
6906 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 11393, n=88)
6627 Points ∼82% -18%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
6397 Points ∼79% -21%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
6365 Points ∼79% -21%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
5920 Points ∼73% -27%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
4640 Points ∼57% -43%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
1316 Points ∼100% +9%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
1286 Points ∼98% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1428, n=88)
1231 Points ∼94% +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
1220 Points ∼93% +1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1203 Points ∼91%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1188 Points ∼90% -1%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1166 Points ∼89% -3%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
12.9 fps ∼100%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
12.1 fps ∼94% -6%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
10.8 fps ∼84% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.7 - 19.8, n=104)
10.3 fps ∼80% -20%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
9.61 fps ∼74% -26%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
9.5 fps ∼74% -26%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
7.69 fps ∼60% -40%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
69.2 s * ∼100%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
60.16 s * ∼87% +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 95.8, n=80)
56.1 s * ∼81% +19%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
52.6 s * ∼76% +24%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
49 s * ∼71% +29%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
47.2 s * ∼68% +32%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
28.6 s * ∼41% +59%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.634 sec * ∼100% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.531 - 1.088, n=85)
0.613 sec * ∼97% -7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.607 sec * ∼96% -6%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.603 sec * ∼95% -5%
Aorus 5 KB
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.602 sec * ∼95% -5%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.583 sec * ∼92% -1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.575 sec * ∼91%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1909 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
102 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
188 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
5766 Points ∼100%
Aorus 5 KB
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
5452 Points ∼95% -5%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5427 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=317)
5344 Points ∼93% -7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
5193 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
5095 Points ∼88% -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
4887 Points ∼85% -15%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
1781 μs * ∼100% -130%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
1767.3 μs * ∼99% -128%
Aorus 5 KB
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
1218.2 μs * ∼68% -57%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
797.4 μs * ∼45% -3%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
775.7 μs * ∼44%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU
723.4 μs * ∼41% +7%

* ... smaller is better

HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G		Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB		Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB		Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00		Aorus 5 KB
ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)		Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU		Average WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
28%
-13%
-0%
10%
-18%
-4%
Write 4K
119.6
233
95%
219.8
84%
117.5
-2%
162.1
36%
145.4
22%
147 (107 - 208, n=13)
23%
Read 4K
47.4
54.5
15%
50.16
6%
47.36
0%
60.66
28%
51.6
9%
46.6 (36.8 - 53.7, n=13)
-2%
Write Seq
2677
3050
14%
978.7
-63%
2748
3%
2366
-12%
1007
-62%
1975 (1025 - 2707, n=13)
-26%
Read Seq
2220
3042
37%
1990
-10%
2084
-6%
2633
19%
1145
-48%
2020 (1356 - 2517, n=13)
-9%
Write 4K Q32T1
427.4
519.5
22%
515.8
21%
407.3
-5%
428.2
0%
468.4
10%
402 (237 - 516, n=13)
-6%
Read 4K Q32T1
549.2
546.1
-1%
298.3
-46%
474.6
-14%
582.2
6%
528.1
-4%
447 (333 - 600, n=13)
-19%
Write Seq Q32T1
2706
3241
20%
981.7
-64%
3069
13%
2480
-8%
1381
-49%
2456 (1087 - 2708, n=13)
-9%
Read Seq Q32T1
2869
3538
23%
1907.2
-34%
3154
10%
3121
9%
2291
-20%
3295 (2869 - 3426, n=13)
15%
AS SSD
15%
-29%
-3%
-17%
-36%
-20%
Score Total
5075
5184
2%
2143
-58%
5205
3%
3279
-35%
2643
-48%
3808 (2834 - 5376, n=13)
-25%
Score Write
2449
2734
12%
1101
-55%
2309
-6%
1714
-30%
1016
-59%
1673 (1173 - 2721, n=13)
-32%
Score Read
1738
1627
-6%
701
-60%
1915
10%
1046
-40%
1096
-37%
1426 (895 - 1787, n=13)
-18%
Access Time Write *
0.022
0.02
9%
0.02
9%
0.036
-64%
0.036
-64%
0.036
-64%
0.0426 (0.022 - 0.076, n=13)
-94%
Access Time Read *
0.138
0.034
75%
0.087
37%
0.06
57%
0.049
64%
0.117
15%
0.0782 (0.05 - 0.138, n=13)
43%
4K-64 Write
2060.9
2297.92
12%
845.47
-59%
1960.96
-5%
1375.73
-33%
780.22
-62%
1341 (938 - 2346, n=13)
-35%
4K-64 Read
1463.06
1282.5
-12%
472.49
-68%
1637.26
12%
713.6
-51%
850.81
-42%
1140 (615 - 1463, n=13)
-22%
4K Write
175.13
190.52
9%
164.78
-6%
103.18
-41%
121.32
-31%
109.31
-38%
145 (96.9 - 212, n=13)
-17%
4K Read
49.5
60.37
22%
60.21
22%
40.61
-18%
53.33
8%
43.66
-12%
44.7 (34.7 - 49.5, n=13)
-10%
Seq Write
2129.44
2452
15%
904
-58%
2446.49
15%
2171.68
2%
1261.05
-41%
1874 (993 - 2479, n=13)
-12%
Seq Read
2255.25
2836
26%
1682
-25%
2368.75
5%
2794.95
24%
2011.91
-11%
2421 (1786 - 2912, n=13)
7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
22% / 20%
-21% / -22%
-2% / -2%
-4% / -6%
-27% / -28%
-12% / -13%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2869 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2706 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 549.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 427.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2220 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2677 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 119.6 MB/s

DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450146014701480149015001510152015301540155015601570158015901600161016201630164016501660167016801690170017101720173017401750176017701780179018001810182018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020203020402050206020702080209021002110212021302140215021602170218021902200221022202230224022502260227022802290230023102320233023402350236023702380239024002410242024302440245024602470248024902500251025202530254025502560257025802590260026102620263026402650266026702680269027002710272027302740275027602770278027902800281028202830284028502860287028802890Tooltip
: Ø2873 (2626.47-2883.9)
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (1097 - 6633, n=120)
4149 Points ∼100% +26%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
3531 Points ∼85% +7%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
3445 Points ∼83% +5%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
3286 Points ∼79%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6164 Points ∼100% +6%
Aorus 5 KB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6123 Points ∼99% +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=273)
6073 Points ∼99% +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6043 Points ∼98% +4%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6012 Points ∼98% +3%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
5848 Points ∼95% 0%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
5819 Points ∼94%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus 5 KB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
16362 Points ∼100% +6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
16355 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
15967 Points ∼98% +3%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
15746 Points ∼96% +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
15609 Points ∼95% +1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
15499 Points ∼95%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=658)
12424 Points ∼76% -20%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus 5 KB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
22138 Points ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
21748 Points ∼98% +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
21542 Points ∼97% +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
21480 Points ∼97% +5%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
21338 Points ∼96% +4%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
20535 Points ∼93%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=734)
14980 Points ∼68% -27%
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
HP Omen 15-en0375ng GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G: Ø57.4 (51-62)
3DMark 11 Performance
18798 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
38655 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
14526 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
6161 poäng
Hjälp
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H
68.3 fps ∼100% +21%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
60.5 (51min - 68max) fps ∼89% +7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H
59.1 (49min) fps ∼87% +5%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
58.8 (48min) fps ∼86% +4%
Aorus 5 KB
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H
57 (47min) fps ∼83% +1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
56.4 fps ∼83%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=426)
54.3 fps ∼80% -4%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H
124.8 fps ∼100% +17%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
107 fps ∼86%
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
105 (90min - 115max) fps ∼84% -2%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
105 fps ∼84% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 223, n=360)
95.9 fps ∼77% -10%
låg med. hög ultra
GTA V (2015) 165 159 127 70.8 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 107 56.4 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 123 115 109 104 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 91.5 81.9 68.8 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 83 73 fps
Battlefield V (2018) 102 93.1 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 61.9 48.1 fps
Valorant (2020) 177 fps
Crysis Remastered (2020) 52.9 40 fps
FIFA 21 (2020) 163 161 fps
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 66 36 fps
Dirt 5 (2020) 59.2 38.7 fps
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) 53 46 fps
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War (2020) 62.2 57.1 fps
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) 71.8 64.1 fps
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020) 54 51 fps
Cyberpunk 2077 (2020) 45.3 38.8 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.341.235.93839.52534.836.933.335.9383146.244.143.143.245.64030.832.527.628.630.65034.743.623.624.8386332.336.131.925.438.68030.83728.219.436.310026.530.420.218.330.412530.129.918.817.936.316030.827.417.917.634.62003125.421.522.13125031.526.317.417.435.331531.227.21313.934.940030.623.811.111.333.750031.624.410.510.535.463034.325.510.51038.480033.225.210.310.139.6100033.62610.310.439.6125034.926.710.710.640.6160034.927.511.110.940.920003530.611.211.240.4250039.124.711.611.841.5315031.519.812.312.340.9400027.817.412.612.336500023.814.612.712.632.5630021.11412.712.629.9800018.713.112.912.726.61000017.212.812.812.822.31250016.112.512.512.418.61600015.911.711.711.714.7SPL45.336.924.424.250.6N4.62.40.60.67.2median 31median 25.2median 12.5median 12.3median 35.3Delta4.65.21.91.84.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Omen 15-en0375ng

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
24 / 25 / 37 dB(A)
Hög belastning
45 / 51 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Aorus 5 KB
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-2%
-6%
-2%
-8%
-6%
-10%
off / environment *
24
25
-4%
30.2
-26%
25
-4%
25
-4%
30.7
-28%
29 (24 - 32, n=418)
-21%
Idle Minimum *
24
26
-8%
30.2
-26%
25
-4%
26
-8%
30.7
-28%
31.2 (24 - 42, n=841)
-30%
Idle Average *
25
30
-20%
30.2
-21%
29
-16%
30
-20%
30.7
-23%
32.5 (24.4 - 46.6, n=841)
-30%
Idle Maximum *
37
32
14%
30.2
18%
34
8%
34
8%
30.7
17%
34.7 (24.4 - 57, n=841)
6%
Load Average *
45
46
-2%
40
11%
44
2%
53
-18%
36.6
19%
41.3 (28 - 59, n=842)
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
48
-0%
49
-2%
49
-2%
51
-6%
47
2%
Load Maximum *
51
48
6%
49
4%
49
4%
56
-10%
50.9
-0%
48.6 (38.9 - 66.6, n=842)
5%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 39 °C41 °C42 °C 
 38 °C42 °C39 °C 
 30 °C32 °C33 °C 
Max: 42 °C
Medel: 37.3 °C
53 °C54 °C50 °C
48 °C48 °C33 °C
32 °C29 °C28 °C
Max: 54 °C
Medel: 41.7 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  55 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.4 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 42.6 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.2 °C / -11.2 F).
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Aorus 5 KB
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-14%
4%
-21%
-11%
2%
-5%
Maximum Upper Side *
42
51
-21%
42.9
-2%
55
-31%
50
-19%
46.3
-10%
46 (28 - 68.8, n=807)
-10%
Maximum Bottom *
54
64
-19%
49.9
8%
65
-20%
49
9%
44.4
18%
49.9 (25.9 - 78, n=805)
8%
Idle Upper Side *
28
29
-4%
27.8
1%
32
-14%
35
-25%
28.1
-0%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=758)
-10%
Idle Bottom *
29
32
-10%
27
7%
34
-17%
31
-7%
29.4
-1%
31.7 (21.1 - 50.3, n=756)
-9%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203840.12535.938.53143.243.24028.629.85024.826.66325.428.38019.425.410018.320.612517.931.916017.643.820022.15225017.462.531513.965.240011.366.850010.570.16301069.280010.166.1100010.469.9125010.670.8160010.968.4200011.265.6250011.867.2315012.370.2400012.372.1500012.672.6630012.670.9800012.760.81000012.867.41250012.470.51600011.773.2SPL24.281.6N0.654.5median 12.3median 67.4Delta1.87.138.43935.536.644.347.829.934.241.839.126.830.32426.316.61915.928.721.141.618.949.715.756.813.959.41262.511.566.211.270.811.270.51168.711.166.711.466.811.467.711.568.712.969.313.164.414.360.814.475.413.582.212.879.712.379.511.863.72585.50.658.4median 12.8median 66.71.56.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen 15-en0375ngSchenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen 15-en0375ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.1 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 4 / 9 / 22 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 102 / 182 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Aorus 5 KB
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-43%
-5%
-4%
-31%
12%
-114%
Idle Minimum *
4
12
-200%
5.4
-35%
4
-0%
8
-100%
3.2
20%
18.7 (1.9 - 113, n=801)
-368%
Idle Average *
9
14
-56%
10
-11%
10
-11%
12
-33%
8.3
8%
24.1 (6 - 119, n=801)
-168%
Idle Maximum *
22
20
9%
10.5
52%
19
14%
21
5%
8.7
60%
29.7 (8.3 - 122, n=801)
-35%
Load Average *
102
103
-1%
135
-32%
96
6%
128
-25%
82
20%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=793)
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
119
125
-5%
144
-21%
136
-14%
138
-16%
151
-27%
Load Maximum *
182
193
-6%
147
19%
214
-18%
217
-19%
195
-7%
177 (21.9 - 590, n=792)
3%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
20tim 00min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10tim 28min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 48min
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 70.9 Wh		Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 62 Wh		Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48 Wh		Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 58.7 Wh		Aorus 5 KB
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48.96 Wh		Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H
i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 60 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-41%
-28%
-38%
-52%
-27%
-51%
Reader / Idle
1200
469
-61%
587
-51%
575
-52%
538
-55%
848
-29%
367 (39 - 1399, n=742)
-69%
WiFi v1.3
628
354
-44%
370
-41%
329
-48%
285
-55%
433
-31%
271 (62 - 683, n=467)
-57%
Load
108
87
-19%
116
7%
92
-15%
58
-46%
84
-22%
80.1 (18 - 243, n=710)
-26%
H.264
371
322
554
278 (88 - 860, n=175)

För

+ Bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda
+ Praktiskt Command Center
+ Välbalanserad hårdvara
+ Utmärkt batteritid
+ Elegant design

Emot

- Tangentbordets layout tar tid att vänja sig vid
- Inga aktuella USB-portar
- Hög ljudnivå
- Skärmen har brister
- Instabilt lock
- Svagt WLAN

Sammanfattning

HP Omen 15-en0375ng: Recensionsex från HP Germany
HP Omen 15-en0375ng: Recensionsex från HP Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Om du kan stå ut med en 60 Hz-skärm med dåliga färger samt hög ljudnivå i 3D-läge är Omen 15-en0375ng en kraftfull och inte allt för dyr spellaptop.

Vi tycker att 12.600 kronor för en Ryzen 7 4800H CPU, en GeForce RTX 2060 GPU, en SSD-enhet på 512 GB och 16 GB RAM med dubbla kanaler är ett bra erbjudande som appellerar till prismedvetna gamers. Det är sällan några problem med höga detaljnivåer i datorns egna upplösning (1920 x 1080). Man blir dessutom bortskämd med förstklassig batteritid som till och med slår modeller från en del andra laptopklasser.

Om HP nu bara förbättrar WLAN-modulens hastighet, höljets stabilitet och den flerfaldigt kritiserade bildkvaliteten får konkurrenterna klä sig extra varmt. 

Obs: Andra AMD-varianter av Omen 15 har en (antagligen bättre) 144 Hz-skärm.

HP Omen 15-en0375ng - 12/29/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Design
74 / 98 → 75%
Tangentbord
83%
Mus
75%
Anslutningar
60 / 80 → 75%
Vikt
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Batteri
88 / 95 → 93%
Skärm
82%
Spelprestanda
90%
Programprestanda
93%
Temperatur
84 / 95 → 89%
Ljudnivå
75 / 90 → 83%
Audio
77%
Camera
41 / 85 → 48%
Medel
76%
83%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
HP Omen 15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: HP Omen 15 - Stark AMD-processor får Intel att darra (Sammanfattning)
Florian Glaser, 2021-01- 8 (Update: 2021-01- 8)