Test: HP 250 G7 (Core i5-8265U, 8 GB RAM, FHD, 512 GB SSD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Name: HP 250 G7 6HM85ES
Brand: HP

Skärmen begår en synd En billig kontorslaptop som kommer med en modern Intel Whiskey Lake CPU, 8 GB RAM och en stor NVMe SSD? Det hade varit ett kap om det inte vore för en stor brist som nog kommer avråda många intresserade från att köpa den.

Christian Hintze, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 04/29/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Whiskey Lake Laptop / Notebook Business

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP 250 G7 6HM85ES

Processor

Intel Core i5-8265U 4 x 1.6 - 3.9 GHz, Whiskey Lake-U

Grafikkort

Intel UHD Graphics 620, 24.20.100.6222

Minne

8 GB

, 1 SO-DIMM plats

Skärm

15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, BOE0687, TN, glansig: nej

Moderkort

Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium

Hårddisk

WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, 512 GB

, 480 GB ledigt

Ljudkort

Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm kombinerad anslutning för hörlurar och mikrofon, Kortläsare: SD-kortläsare i full storlek

Nätverk

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 4.2

Optisk enhet

HP DVDRW GUE1N

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 22.5 x 376 x 246

Batteri

41 Wh Litiumjon

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webbkamera: 720p-kamera
Primary Camera: 1 MPix

Övrigt

Tangentbordsbelysning: nej, 12 Månader Garanti

Vikt

1.898 kg, Strömförsörjning: 289 g

Pris

655 Euro

Länkar

HP hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Storleksjämförelse

HP 250 G6 2UB93ES Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 HP 250 G7 6HM85ES Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE DIN A4 ❌

Höger sida: SD-kortläsare, USB 2.0 Typ A, DVD-enhet, Kensington-lås

Vänster sida: Strömanslutning, Ethernet-port, HDMI, 2x USB 3.0 Typ A, 3.5 mm ljudanslutning

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	145 MB/s +362%
Average of class Office (8 - 82.7, n=49, last 2 years)	53 MB/s +69%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	31.4 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	29.7 MB/s -5%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	25.7 MB/s -18%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	24.2 MB/s -23%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	23.9 MB/s -24%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	165.7 MB/s +386%
Average of class Office (25 - 90.5, n=43, last 2 years)	64.7 MB/s +90%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	34.1 MB/s
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	29.9 MB/s -12%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	27.1 MB/s -21%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	26.6 MB/s -22%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Office (819 - 842, n=2, last 2 years)	831 MBit/s +209%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	568 (553^min - 591^max) MBit/s +111%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	350 MBit/s +30%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	331 (290^min - 376^max) MBit/s +23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	315 MBit/s +17%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821	269 (182^min - 363^max) MBit/s
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	163 MBit/s -39%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Office (883 - 972, n=2, last 2 years)	928 MBit/s +230%
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	429 MBit/s +53%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	305 MBit/s +9%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	299 MBit/s +6%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	295 (186^min - 388^max) MBit/s +5%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821	281 (257^min - 287^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	279 (140^min - 285^max) MBit/s -1%

HP 250 G7 6HM85ES; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø281 (257-287)

HP 250 G7 6HM85ES; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø269 (182-363)


211 cd/m²	195 cd/m²	190 cd/m²
205 cd/m²	205 cd/m²	196 cd/m²
209 cd/m²	216 cd/m²	217 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

BOE0687 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 217 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 204.9 cd/m² Minimum: 13.2 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 198 cd/m²
Kontrast: 394:1 (Svärta: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.15 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.98
ΔE Greyscale 12.62 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.93% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.61% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP 250 G7 6HM85ES BOE0687, , 1920x1080, 15.60	HP 250 G6 2UB93ES BOE BOE0687, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE BOE0700, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE LG Philips LP156WFB-SPB1, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) BOE07C5 (NV156FHM-N42), , 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		-1%	54%	0%	-11%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	39.61	39.11 -1%	65 64%	39.85 1%	35.37 -11%	40.21 2%
sRGB Coverage	59.5	58.8 -1%	85.9 44%	58.8 -1%	53.2 -11%	59.6 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	40.93	40.41 -1%	62.8 53%	41.17 1%	36.54 -11%	41.54 1%
Response Times		-33%	-59%	26%	-59%	-98%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	41 ?(22, 19)	42 ?(23, 19) -2%	44 ?(23, 21) -7%	44 ?(21, 23) -7%	38 ?(21, 17) 7%	46 ?(22.4, 23.6) -12%
Response Time Black / White *	12 ?(7, 5)	13 ?(8, 5) -8%	30 ?(19, 11) -150%	31 ?(17, 14) -158%	27 ?(16, 11) -125%	34 ?(15.2, 18.8) -183%
PWM Frequency	25000 ?(90)	2500 ?(90) -90%	20000 ?(90) -20%	86000 ?(90) 244%		60 ?(100) -100%
Screen		1%	44%	19%	23%	50%
Brightness middle	205	184 -10%	290 41%	283 38%	260 27%	280 37%
Brightness	205	178 -13%	249 21%	252 23%	241 18%	267 30%
Brightness Distribution	88	80 -9%	78 -11%	75 -15%	87 -1%	85 -3%
Black Level *	0.52	0.38 27%	0.38 27%	0.63 -21%	0.39 25%	0.2 62%
Contrast	394	484 23%	763 94%	449 14%	667 69%	1400 255%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	11.15	11.29 -1%	4.35 61%	4.02 64%	5.23 53%	5 55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	19.08	19.48 -2%	11.06 42%	8.77 54%	7.73 59%	7.9 59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.98			4.03 -35%	4.2 -41%	3.6 -21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	12.62	12.43 2%	3.01 76%	0.8 94%	4.22 67%	3.7 71%
Gamma	2.38 ^92%	2.34 ^94%	2.44 ^90%	2.35 ^94%	2.62 ^84%	2.08 ^106%
CCT	14189 ^46%	13823 ^47%	7198 ^90%	6552 ^99%	6104 ^106%	7309 ^89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	38	37 -3%	56 47%	38 0%	34 -11%	38.09 0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	59	59 0%	86 46%	58 -2%	53 -10%	59.26 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-11% / -6%	13% / 27%	15% / 17%	-16% / 7%	-16% / 15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

25000 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

HP 250 G7 6HM85ES: Ø486 (482.38-503.85)

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Office (82.6 - 284, n=118, last 2 years)	218 Points +42%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U (111 - 164, n=35)	155 Points +1%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES	153 Points
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)	142 Points -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE	140 Points -8%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110	139 Points -9%
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE	128 Points -16%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES	83 Points -46%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Office (160.8 - 2642, n=120, last 2 years)	1405 Points +179%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D)	665 Points +32%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U (457 - 750, n=38)	592 Points +17%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110	508 Points +1%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES	504 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE	488 Points -3%
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE	326 Points -35%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES	213 Points -58%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Office (0.99 - 2.97, n=11, last 2 years)	2.32 Points +34%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U (1.73 - 1.88, n=6)	1.793 Points +4%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES	1.73 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Office (1.93 - 20.3, n=11, last 2 years)	12.8 Points +145%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U (5.22 - 7.22, n=6)	5.98 Points +15%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES	5.22 Points

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Average of class Office (5904 - 13680, n=6, last 2 years)	10072 Points +31%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U (7705 - 7975, n=4)	7880 Points +2%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES	7705 Points
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Average of class Office (22075 - 62930, n=6, last 2 years)	42317 Points +124%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U (18924 - 25361, n=4)	21959 Points +16%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES	18924 Points

Legend

HP 250 G7 6HM85ES Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G

HP 250 G6 2UB93ES Intel Core i3-6006U, Intel HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ

Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ

Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620,

Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE Intel Core i5-7200U, Intel HD Graphics 620, Micron SSD 1100 SED 256GB MTFDDAK256TBN

Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ

Average Intel Core i5-8265U

Average of class Office

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

8276 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

18924 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

7705 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

5.22 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

35.07 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.73 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

153 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

42.44 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

504 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Office (2325 - 7157, n=105, last 2 years)	5348 Points +50%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2247 - 3985, n=29)	3705 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	3609 Points +1%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	3573 Points
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	3407 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) GeForce MX110, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ	3194 Points -11%
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Micron SSD 1100 SED 256GB MTFDDAK256TBN	3106 Points -13%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES HD Graphics 520, 6006U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	2480 Points -31%
Essentials
Average of class Office (5095 - 20841, n=105, last 2 years)	9832 Points +28%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	8110 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (5073 - 8689, n=29)	7833 Points +2%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	7660 Points
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	7021 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) GeForce MX110, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ	6926 Points -10%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES HD Graphics 520, 6006U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	6593 Points -14%
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Micron SSD 1100 SED 256GB MTFDDAK256TBN	6539 Points -15%
Productivity
Average of class Office (3041 - 10198, n=105, last 2 years)	7449 Points +21%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	6171 Points
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2941 - 6556, n=29)	6061 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	5777 Points -6%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	5505 Points -11%
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Micron SSD 1100 SED 256GB MTFDDAK256TBN	5386 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) GeForce MX110, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ	4581 Points -26%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES HD Graphics 520, 6006U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	3783 Points -39%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Office (1912 - 9056, n=105, last 2 years)	5810 Points +122%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2067 - 3210, n=29)	2917 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) GeForce MX110, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ	2790 Points +6%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	2778 Points +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	2723 Points +4%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	2620 Points
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Micron SSD 1100 SED 256GB MTFDDAK256TBN	2311 Points -12%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES HD Graphics 520, 6006U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	1660 Points -37%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Office (2304 - 4830, n=12, last 2 years)	4261 Points +31%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	3621 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2747 - 4244, n=24)	3442 Points +6%
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Micron SSD 1100 SED 256GB MTFDDAK256TBN	3433 Points +6%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	3254 Points
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) GeForce MX110, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ	3153 Points -3%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	3113 Points -4%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES HD Graphics 520, 6006U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	2845 Points -13%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	2550 Points -22%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	4783 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3132 - 4927, n=23)	4657 Points +3%
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Micron SSD 1100 SED 256GB MTFDDAK256TBN	4565 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) GeForce MX110, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ	4544 Points 0%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4542 Points
Average of class Office (1854 - 5610, n=12, last 2 years)	3746 Points -18%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES HD Graphics 520, 6006U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	3617 Points -20%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	3550 Points -22%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3254 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4542 poäng
PCMark 10 Score		3573 poäng
Hjälp

	HP 250 G7 6HM85ES WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	HP 250 G6 2UB93ES Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE	Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE Micron SSD 1100 SED 256GB MTFDDAK256TBN	Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Apple SSD AP0256	Average WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-59%	-56%	-59%	-63%	-60%		-7%
Write 4K	179.3	81 -55%	80.1 -55%		72.1 -60%	77.3 -57%		138.5 ?(94.1 - 191.2, n=27) -23%
Read 4K	47.7	31.48 -34%	32.05 -33%		25 -48%	29.77 -38%		44.2 ?(27.6 - 53.1, n=27) -7%
Write Seq	1265	452.1 -64%	505 -60%	158.1 -88%	413.2 -67%	442.5 -65%		1265 ?(750 - 1768, n=25) 0%
Read Seq	1184	486.5 -59%	528 -55%	892 -25%	488.9 -59%	442.7 -63%		1237 ?(423 - 1710, n=25) 4%
Write 4K Q32T1	450.6	184.6 -59%	204.9 -55%	162.2 -64%	161.5 -64%	173.8 -61%		404 ?(239 - 749, n=27) -10%
Read 4K Q32T1	556	203.9 -63%	226.6 -59%	320.4 -42%	184.8 -67%	233.6 -58%		421 ?(229 - 654, n=27) -24%
Write Seq Q32T1	1455	483.2 -67%	533 -63%	160.2 -89%	432.3 -70%	510 -65%		1491 ?(1319 - 2544, n=27) 2%
Read Seq Q32T1	1717	537 -69%	551 -68%	933 -46%	531 -69%	530 -69%		1741 ?(473 - 3433, n=27) 1%
AS SSD		-68%	-76%	-492%	-76%	-69%	-86%	2%
Seq Read	1477	491.6 -67%	513 -65%	95.9 -94%	494.3 -67%	489 -67%	1056 -29%	1363 ?(399 - 2934, n=28) -8%
Seq Write	1339	460.5 -66%	493.3 -63%	78.9 -94%	341.5 -74%	458 -66%	651 -51%	1227 ?(412 - 2407, n=28) -8%
4K Read	46.26	31.19 -33%	30.36 -34%	2.25 -95%	23.9 -48%	30.24 -35%	16.4 -65%	40.8 ?(25 - 48.3, n=28) -12%
4K Write	143.9	66.6 -54%	78.8 -45%	54.9 -62%	65.9 -54%	81.6 -43%	22.1 -85%	127.3 ?(82.1 - 179.7, n=27) -12%
4K-64 Read	937	366.7 -61%	366.8 -61%	43.28 -95%	236.1 -75%	271.8 -71%	509 -46%	957 ?(631 - 1296, n=28) 2%
4K-64 Write	1190	309 -74%	156.1 -87%	116.6 -90%	258.3 -78%	163 -86%	283 -76%	1081 ?(709 - 1459, n=28) -9%
Access Time Read *	0.046	0.097 -111%	0.129 -180%	2.127 -4524%	0.115 -150%	0.092 -100%	0.186 -304%	0.07744 ?(0.045 - 0.131, n=25) -68%
Access Time Write *	0.024	0.055 -129%	0.046 -92%	0.045 -88%	0.057 -138%	0.044 -83%		0.03671 ?(0.021 - 0.099, n=28) -53%
Score Read	1131	447 -60%	448 -60%	55 -95%	309 -73%	351 -69%		1134 ?(721 - 1638, n=28) 0%
Score Write	1468	422 -71%	284 -81%	179 -88%	358 -76%	290 -80%		1331 ?(926 - 1879, n=28) -9%
Score Total	3181	1106 -65%	971 -69%	262 -92%	827 -74%	830 -74%		3046 ?(2126 - 4334, n=28) -4%
Copy ISO MB/s	765	322.7 -58%			311.7 -59%	253 -67%	545 -29%	1169 ?(765 - 1637, n=17) 53%
Copy Program MB/s	239.9	129.6 -46%			149.6 -38%	108.8 -55%		446 ?(205 - 889, n=17) 86%
Copy Game MB/s	528	222.4 -58%			229.6 -57%	154.4 -71%		874 ?(509 - 1295, n=17) 66%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-64% / -65%	-66% / -68%	-276% / -339%	-70% / -71%	-65% / -66%	-86% / -86%	-3% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G

Sequential Read: 1147 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1291 MB/s

512K Read: 701 MB/s

512K Write: 849 MB/s

4K Read: 38.03 MB/s

4K Write: 116.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 326.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 244.7 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Office (1474 - 13132, n=113, last 2 years)	6062 Points +266%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U	2140 Points +29%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1805 Points +9%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244)	1749 Points +5%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1672 Points +1%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U	1658 Points
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1527 Points -8%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U	1220 Points -26%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Office (5681 - 58068, n=93, last 2 years)	24010 Points +194%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U	11314 Points +38%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	10069 Points +23%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225)	9262 Points +13%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U	8169 Points
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	7584 Points -7%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U	6286 Points -23%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Office (712 - 9228, n=114, last 2 years)	4191 Points +302%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U	1722 Points +65%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213)	1161 Points +11%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U	1043 Points
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	970 Points -7%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6006U	755 Points -28%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	557 Points -47%

3DMark 11 Performance		1803 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		7229 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		956 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

BioShock Infinite
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	66.4 fps +28%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (18.3 - 90.2, n=187)	60.7 fps +17%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	52 fps
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE Intel Core i5-7200U, Intel HD Graphics 620	44.4 fps -15%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES Intel Core i3-6006U, Intel HD Graphics 520	42 fps -19%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	18.3 fps -65%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	34.2 fps +20%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (11.5 - 45.5, n=187)	32.8 fps +15%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	28.4 fps
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE Intel Core i5-7200U, Intel HD Graphics 620	26.2 fps -8%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES Intel Core i3-6006U, Intel HD Graphics 520	23.7 fps -17%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	11.5 fps -60%
1366x768 High Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	29.9 fps +27%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8.1 - 35.9, n=187)	27.5 fps +17%
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	23.6 fps
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE Intel Core i5-7200U, Intel HD Graphics 620	21.6 fps -8%
HP 250 G6 2UB93ES Intel Core i3-6006U, Intel HD Graphics 520	19.7 fps -17%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	8.1 fps -66%

	låg	med.	hög	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	52	28.4	23.6	7.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	19.5	12.1
Rocket League (2017)	45.7	22.6	15.2

	HP 250 G7 6HM85ES UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	HP 250 G6 2UB93ES HD Graphics 520, 6006U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Micron SSD 1100 SED 256GB MTFDDAK256TBN	Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) GeForce MX110, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
Noise		1%	2%	-1%	-1%	-8%
off / environment *	30.7	30.4 1%	30.6 -0%	30.5 1%	30.3 1%	29.9 3%
Idle Minimum *	30.9	31.6 -2%	31.4 -2%	30.9 -0%	30.3 2%	29.9 3%
Idle Average *	31.6	31.6 -0%	31.4 1%	30.9 2%	30.3 4%	30.6 3%
Idle Maximum *	31.6	31.7 -0%	31.5 -0%	31.3 1%	30.3 4%	35 -11%
Load Average *	34.3	33.1 3%	31.9 7%	34.1 1%	37 -8%	38.8 -13%
Load Maximum *	33.8	33 2%	31.4 7%	36.5 -8%	36.9 -9%	45.3 -34%

* ... smaller is better

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		30.9 / 31.6 / 31.6 dB(A)
DVD		36 / dB(A)
Hög belastning		34.3 / 33.8 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30.7 dB(A)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


32 °C	35.1 °C	25.6 °C
33.1 °C	33.1 °C	25.5 °C
27.4 °C	26.9 °C	25.5 °C

Max: 35.1 °C
Medel: 29.4 °C


23.7 °C	34.6 °C	31.3 °C
24 °C	34 °C	33.4 °C
42.4 °C	27 °C	27.5 °C

Max: 42.4 °C
Medel: 30.9 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 54.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 22.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+0.3 °C / 0.6 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP 250 G7 6HM85ES audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.18 / 0.5 Watt
Låg belastning	3.2 / 5.7 / 6.1 Watt
Hög belastning	36.5 / 37.5 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	HP 250 G7 6HM85ES i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, TN, 1920x1080, 15.60	HP 250 G6 2UB93ES 6006U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.60	Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron SSD 1100 SED 256GB MTFDDAK256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) i5-8250U, GeForce MX110, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ, LED, 1920x1080, 15.60	Average Intel UHD Graphics 620	Average of class Office
Power Consumption		12%	-17%	-18%	-3%	-48%	-21%	-36%
Idle Minimum *	3.2	3.4 -6%	3.8 -19%	5 -56%	3.65 -14%	5.6 -75%	3.81 ?(1 - 12.4, n=259) -19%	4.3 ?(2.2 - 9.6, n=107, last 2 years) -34%
Idle Average *	5.7	5.9 -4%	7.7 -35%	7.6 -33%	6.8 -19%	8.6 -51%	6.94 ?(2.8 - 15.7, n=261) -22%	7.35 ?(3.8 - 20.6, n=107, last 2 years) -29%
Idle Maximum *	6.1	6.3 -3%	9.3 -52%	8.6 -41%	6.9 -13%	8.7 -43%	8.75 ?(3.8 - 30, n=259) -43%	9.15 ?(5.1 - 23.9, n=107, last 2 years) -50%
Load Average *	36.5	23 37%	31 15%	25.6 30%	29.1 20%	39.9 -9%	35 ?(8.1 - 51.6, n=259) 4%	41.1 ?(8.7 - 77.9, n=106, last 2 years) -13%
Load Maximum *	37.5	24.3 35%	34.6 8%	34 9%	34 9%	59.9 -60%	47.5 ?(22 - 96.3, n=261) -27%	58.1 ?(11.1 - 101.4, n=107, last 2 years) -55%
Witcher 3 ultra *						33.2

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		13tim 53min
WiFi Websurfing		5tim 39min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7tim 06min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		1tim 31min

	HP 250 G7 6HM85ES i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 41 Wh	HP 250 G6 2UB93ES 6006U, HD Graphics 520, 41.6 Wh	Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh	Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 49 Wh	Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) i5-8250U, GeForce MX110, 40 Wh	Average of class Office
Battery Runtime		21%	-14%	6%	39%	-6%	60%
Reader / Idle	833			754 -9%		613 -26%	1436 ?(527 - 2359, n=21, last 2 years) 72%
H.264	426					465 9%	705 ?(348 - 1112, n=40, last 2 years) 65%
WiFi v1.3	339	409 21%	291 -14%	350 3%	471 39%	340 0%	594 ?(300 - 1137, n=107, last 2 years) 75%
Load	91			113 24%			117.7 ?(56 - 218, n=67, last 2 years) 29%

För

+ billig

+ mer kompakt än sin föregångare

+ skapligt tangentbord

+ blixtsnabb SSD

+ gedigen prestanda

Emot

- TN-skärm

- höljet skramlar när det flyttas

- utdaterade portar

- svår att ta isär

- liten styrplatta

- aggressiv fläkt

Recension av HP 250 G7. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger.de.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

HP 250 G7 är inte lätt att betygsätta. Å ena sidan är det en rimligt prissatt kontorslaptop som på en del ställen är otroligt välutrustad för sitt pris, men det går inte att förlåta att HP har valt att använda en TN-skärm.

Portarna kunde förvisso varit mer varierade och moderna, vilket även gäller styrplattan. Den kunde också varit lättare att underhålla, men en del kompromisser förväntar vi oss från en instegslaptop.

Med tanke på priset är det mycket som talar för HP 250 G7. Men TN-skärmen är oförlåtlig, till och med för en kontorslaptop på instegsnivå.

Men vi har inte sett en så svag skärm i en laptop på väldigt länge, åtminstone inte sedan vi recenserade föregångaren. Allt med den är svagt och undermåligt, vilket är anledningen till att vi inte kan rekommendera dig att köpa 250 G7. HP borde åtminstone erbjuda en IPS-skärm som tillval, för det hade gjort 250 G7 till ett mer intressant förslag. Men som det är, om du kan se bortom den hemska skärmen eller kommer ha den ansluten till en extern skärm majoriteten av tiden, så kommer du inte att hitta en bättre kontorslaptop för 5.999 kronor än HP 250 G7. Men vi rekommenderar att du letar någon annanstans om du använder din laptop på resande fot, för TN-skärmen är hemsk.

HP 250 G7 6HM85ES - 2019-04-10 04/10/2019 v6^(old)
Christian Hintze

Design

63 / 98 → 64%

Tangentbord

74%

Mus

75%

Anslutningar

45 / 80 → 57%

Vikt

64 / 20-67 → 94%

Batteri

87%

Skärm

74%

Spelprestanda

55 / 68 → 80%

Programprestanda

87 / 92 → 94%

Temperatur

94%

Ljudnivå

90%

Audio

56%

Camera

33 / 85 → 39%

Medel

69%

78%

Office - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 9924 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: HP 250 G7 (Core i5-8265U, 8 GB RAM, FHD, 512 GB SSD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Christian Hintze, 2019-04-29 (Update: 2019-04-29)