Notebookcheck

Test: Cubot King Kong Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Wimmer (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 06/26/2018

Stark som en gorilla? Billig och robust, så presenterar Cubot King Kong sig själv. En smartphone på 5 tum med en genomsnittligt snabb SoC i ett tungt vatten och dammskyddat hölje. Är den tillräckligt tuff för vardagslivets verklighet?

Cubot King Kong
Processor
Mediatek MT6580M
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-400 MP2
Minne
2048 MB 
Skärm
5 tum 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixlar 294 PPI, kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm kombinerad ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 64 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: accelerometer, närhetssensor, kompass
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​1700/​1900/​2100), Dual SIM, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 14.85 x 153 x 80.2
Batteri
16.7 Wh, 4400 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.2, kontrast-AF, LED-blixt, video @720p
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: monohögtalare på baksidan, Tangentbord: virtuellt tangentbord, nätadapter, USB-kabel, mini-skruvmejsel, SAR-värden: 0.72 W/kg (kropp), 0.31 W/kg (huvud); IP68-certifierad, fanless, ruggedized
Vikt
246 g, Strömförsörjning: 52 g
Pris
119 Kr

 

Cubot King Kong
Cubot King Kong
Cubot King Kong
Cubot King Kong
Cubot King Kong
Cubot King Kong
Cubot King Kong

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=259)
186 MBit/s ∼100% +242%
Oukitel WP5000
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash
114 MBit/s ∼61% +110%
Ulefone Armor X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
98.3 MBit/s ∼53% +81%
Cubot King Kong
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.4 MBit/s ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Mali-T720, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.2 MBit/s ∼26% -10%
CAT S31
Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 16 GB eMMC Flash
41.6 MBit/s ∼22% -24%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=259)
182 MBit/s ∼100% +215%
Oukitel WP5000
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash
109 MBit/s ∼60% +89%
Ulefone Armor X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
103 MBit/s ∼57% +79%
Cubot King Kong
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
57.7 MBit/s ∼32%
CAT S31
Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 16 GB eMMC Flash
39.3 MBit/s ∼22% -32%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Mali-T720, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
37.9 MBit/s ∼21% -34%
GPS Cubot King Kong – översikt
GPS Cubot King Kong – översikt
GPS Cubot King Kong – skog
GPS Cubot King Kong – skog
GPS Cubot King Kong – bro
GPS Cubot King Kong – bro
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – översikt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – översikt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – skog
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – skog
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bro
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
454
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 466 cd/m² Medel: 448.9 cd/m² Minimum: 18.25 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 466 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1864:1 (Svärta: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.03 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 7.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
91.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Cubot King Kong
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Oukitel WP5000
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
CAT S31
IPS, 1280x720, 4.7
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Ulefone Armor X
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Screen
-60%
19%
-25%
9%
Brightness middle
466
506
9%
784
68%
445
-5%
564
21%
Brightness
449
503
12%
750
67%
437
-3%
541
20%
Brightness Distribution
90
86
-4%
92
2%
88
-2%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.25
0.97
-288%
0.45
-80%
0.67
-168%
0.37
-48%
Contrast
1864
522
-72%
1742
-7%
664
-64%
1524
-18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.03
9.4
-34%
4.28
39%
6.5
8%
5.1
27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
16.25
19.9
-22%
8.75
46%
10.6
35%
9.6
41%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.1
13
-83%
6.1
14%
7.2
-1%
5.4
24%
Gamma
2.26 106%
2.59 93%
2.49 96%
2.53 95%
2.1 114%
CCT
7244 90%
10219 64%
7175 91%
8274 79%
7755 84%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8813 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 43 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41.3 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
23540 Points ∼33%
Oukitel WP5000
57489 Points ∼81% +144%
CAT S31
24865 Points ∼35% +6%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
35379 Points ∼50% +50%
Ulefone Armor X
37586 Points ∼53% +60%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (15185 - 25237, n=10)
22450 Points ∼32% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=350)
70775 Points ∼100% +201%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
21088 Points ∼21%
Oukitel WP5000
78088 Points ∼78% +270%
Ulefone Armor X
46435 Points ∼46% +120%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (17073 - 21088, n=4)
19302 Points ∼19% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 290397, n=127)
100740 Points ∼100% +378%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
0 Points ∼0%
Oukitel WP5000
4174 Points ∼95%
CAT S31
2300 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
3446 Points ∼78%
Ulefone Armor X
3184 Points ∼72%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (0 - 0, n=2)
0 Points ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone (2814 - 8601, n=214)
4398 Points ∼100%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
3041 Points ∼61%
Oukitel WP5000
4947 Points ∼100% +63%
CAT S31
3080 Points ∼62% +1%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
4508 Points ∼91% +48%
Ulefone Armor X
4298 Points ∼87% +41%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2516 - 3041, n=10)
2719 Points ∼55% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (5960 - 10264, n=378)
4665 Points ∼94% +53%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
567 Points ∼64%
Oukitel WP5000
888 Points ∼100% +57%
CAT S31
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
661 Points ∼74% +17%
Ulefone Armor X
7 Points ∼1% -99%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (9 - 640, n=10)
404 Points ∼45% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=453)
666 Points ∼75% +17%
Graphics (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
138 Points ∼9%
Oukitel WP5000
1120 Points ∼74% +712%
CAT S31
256 Points ∼17% +86%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
253 Points ∼17% +83%
Ulefone Armor X
188 Points ∼12% +36%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (136 - 145, n=10)
140 Points ∼9% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=453)
1510 Points ∼100% +994%
Memory (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
403 Points ∼33%
Oukitel WP5000
1229 Points ∼100% +205%
CAT S31
328 Points ∼27% -19%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
1066 Points ∼87% +165%
Ulefone Armor X
900 Points ∼73% +123%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (189 - 404, n=10)
332 Points ∼27% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=453)
1124 Points ∼91% +179%
System (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
985 Points ∼31%
Oukitel WP5000
3225 Points ∼100% +227%
CAT S31
899 Points ∼28% -9%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
1396 Points ∼43% +42%
Ulefone Armor X
1491 Points ∼46% +51%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (958 - 1011, n=10)
980 Points ∼30% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=453)
2257 Points ∼70% +129%
Overall (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
420 Points ∼30%
Oukitel WP5000
1409 Points ∼100% +235%
CAT S31
1 Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
706 Points ∼50% +68%
Ulefone Armor X
206 Points ∼15% -51%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (144 - 432, n=10)
323 Points ∼23% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 4308, n=457)
1131 Points ∼80% +169%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
773 Points ∼20%
Oukitel WP5000
2663 Points ∼69% +245%
Ulefone Armor X
1416 Points ∼37% +83%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (773 - 875, n=4)
836 Points ∼22% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14417, n=153)
3853 Points ∼100% +398%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
1237 Points ∼31%
Oukitel WP5000
3943 Points ∼100% +219%
CAT S31
1135 Points ∼29% -8%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
1855 Points ∼47% +50%
Ulefone Armor X
1847 Points ∼47% +49%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (1131 - 1237, n=4)
1166 Points ∼30% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 10558, n=200)
3952 Points ∼100% +219%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
425 Points ∼37%
Oukitel WP5000
863 Points ∼74% +103%
CAT S31
437 Points ∼38% +3%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
629 Points ∼54% +48%
Ulefone Armor X
662 Points ∼57% +56%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (394 - 431, n=4)
419 Points ∼36% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=201)
1159 Points ∼100% +173%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
8112 Points ∼67%
Oukitel WP5000
Points ∼0% -100%
CAT S31
6396 Points ∼53% -21%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
11459 Points ∼94% +41%
Ulefone Armor X
10195 Points ∼84% +26%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (7498 - 8913, n=10)
7999 Points ∼66% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (8065 - 36762, n=489)
12157 Points ∼100% +50%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
2396 Points ∼15%
Oukitel WP5000
Points ∼0% -100%
CAT S31
5042 Points ∼32% +110%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
3985 Points ∼26% +66%
Ulefone Armor X
3585 Points ∼23% +50%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2396 - 2485, n=10)
2463 Points ∼16% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 113380, n=489)
15596 Points ∼100% +551%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
2841 Points ∼21%
Oukitel WP5000
Points ∼0% -100%
CAT S31
5291 Points ∼39% +86%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
4661 Points ∼35% +64%
Ulefone Armor X
4188 Points ∼31% +47%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (2841 - 2946, n=10)
2910 Points ∼22% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 64405, n=490)
13491 Points ∼100% +375%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
4.2 fps ∼15%
Oukitel WP5000
24 fps ∼88% +471%
CAT S31
5.6 fps ∼20% +33%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
6.8 fps ∼25% +62%
Ulefone Armor X
5.9 fps ∼22% +40%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (4.1 - 11, n=10)
5 fps ∼18% +19%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=517)
27.4 fps ∼100% +552%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Cubot King Kong
7.5 fps ∼24%
Oukitel WP5000
31 fps ∼100% +313%
CAT S31
9.8 fps ∼32% +31%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
11 fps ∼35% +47%
Ulefone Armor X
9.2 fps ∼30% +23%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (4.4 - 12, n=10)
8.57 fps ∼28% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=520)
23.6 fps ∼76% +215%

Legend

 
Cubot King Kong Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel WP5000 Mediatek Helio P25, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
CAT S31 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Armor X Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 224, n=372)
33.4 Points ∼100% +161%
Oukitel WP5000 (Chrome 66)
26.91 Points ∼81% +110%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58)
20.988 Points ∼63% +64%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
18.148 Points ∼54% +42%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (10.8 - 14.5, n=10)
13.2 Points ∼40% +3%
Cubot King Kong (Chrome 66)
12.789 Points ∼38%
CAT S31
12.442 Points ∼37% -3%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Oukitel WP5000 (Chrome 66)
5132 Points ∼100% +132%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=508)
4996 Points ∼97% +126%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
3151 Points ∼61% +43%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58)
3133 Points ∼61% +42%
Cubot King Kong (Chrome 66)
2208 Points ∼43%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (1645 - 2280, n=10)
2066 Points ∼40% -6%
CAT S31
2010 Points ∼39% -9%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Cubot King Kong (Chrome 66)
18388.4 ms * ∼100%
CAT S31
17827.9 ms * ∼97% +3%
Average Mediatek MT6580M (14579 - 21257, n=10)
16774 ms * ∼91% +9%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
15875.7 ms * ∼86% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=527)
11914 ms * ∼65% +35%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58)
11130 ms * ∼61% +39%
Oukitel WP5000 (Chrome 66)
10209.2 ms * ∼56% +44%

* ... smaller is better

Cubot King KongOukitel WP5000CAT S31Samsung Galaxy XCover 4Ulefone Armor XAverage 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
177%
159%
172%
203%
96%
171%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
10.3 (Kingston 32GB)
20.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
99%
59.5
478%
55.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
440%
62.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
507%
37.1 (6.38 - 65.4, n=106)
260%
43.9 (3.4 - 87.1, n=284)
326%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
20.6 (Kingston 32GB)
21.11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
81.8
297%
68.97 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
235%
81.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
296%
55.4 (10.8 - 87.7, n=106)
169%
62.3 (8.2 - 96.5, n=284)
202%
Random Write 4KB
7
9.89
41%
14.81
112%
11.9
70%
10.17
45%
7.3 (0.49 - 37.9, n=221)
4%
13.6 (0.14 - 164, n=566)
94%
Random Read 4KB
17.2
66.88
289%
14.28
-17%
21.8
27%
14.7
-15%
19.8 (2.49 - 61.7, n=221)
15%
34.9 (1.59 - 173, n=566)
103%
Sequential Write 256KB
32.6
162.14
397%
62.13
91%
73.6
126%
82.85
154%
41.1 (8.74 - 97.6, n=221)
26%
73.2 (2.99 - 228, n=566)
125%
Sequential Read 256KB
77.3
257.52
233%
71.06
-8%
181.6
135%
255.34
230%
157 (9.66 - 294, n=221)
103%
214 (12.1 - 832, n=566)
177%
Hög belastning
 34 °C32.5 °C33.1 °C 
 34.9 °C32.4 °C33.6 °C 
 34.7 °C32.5 °C33 °C 
Max: 34.9 °C
Medel: 33.4 °C
31.4 °C31.6 °C34.9 °C
31.3 °C31.7 °C36.9 °C
31.7 °C32.1 °C35.4 °C
Max: 36.9 °C
Medel: 33 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  35.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.740.5253537.63135.637.24033.128.4503430.66332.328.58019.823.510019.222.612517.821.916014.121.720014.82525012.630.331511.339.240010.847.650010.252.76309.459.1800964.110008.364.712508.363.216008.262.62000861.925008.162.33150863.74000864.750007.964.66300860.880008.353.4100008.349.7125008.343.7160008.326.8SPL68.32174.4N21.60.331.4median 8.3Cubot King Kongmedian 53.4Delta1.814.231.634.125.433.425.332.332.927.633.628.131.634.428.430.12736.520.833.42241.221.347.620.852.121.255.219.457.419.560.317.765.417.968.617.87017.370.617.47216.771.317.269.718.27117.972.417.666.317.761.417.857.917.95818.149.218.246.63080.41.347.4median 17.9Samsung Galaxy XCover 4median 60.31.310.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Cubot King Kong audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.6 / 1.8 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.8 / 5.5 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Cubot King Kong
4400 mAh
Oukitel WP5000
5200 mAh
CAT S31
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
2800 mAh
Ulefone Armor X
5500 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6580M
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-28%
-4%
0%
-30%
-15%
-9%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
1.18
-69%
0.73
-4%
0.56
20%
1.22
-74%
0.816 (0.56 - 1.1, n=10)
-17%
0.872 (0.2 - 3.4, n=587)
-25%
Idle Average *
1.6
2.17
-36%
2.21
-38%
1.57
2%
2.07
-29%
1.76 (1.36 - 2.26, n=10)
-10%
1.703 (0.6 - 6.2, n=586)
-6%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
2.26
-26%
2.25
-25%
1.68
7%
2.14
-19%
2.11 (1.38 - 2.39, n=10)
-17%
1.968 (0.74 - 6.6, n=587)
-9%
Load Average *
3.8
3.68
3%
2.99
21%
4.6
-21%
4.92
-29%
4.85 (3.11 - 6.97, n=10)
-28%
3.99 (0.8 - 10.8, n=581)
-5%
Load Maximum *
5.5
6.06
-10%
4.12
25%
5.92
-8%
5.4
2%
5.69 (3.59 - 7.03, n=10)
-3%
5.63 (1.2 - 14.2, n=581)
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
18tim 18min
Cubot King Kong
4400 mAh
Oukitel WP5000
5200 mAh
CAT S31
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
2800 mAh
Ulefone Armor X
5500 mAh
Battery Runtime
8%
-2%
-39%
-23%
Reader / Idle
1388
WiFi v1.3
1098
1189
8%
1074
-2%
668
-39%
845
-23%
Load
205
H.264
681

För

+ väldigt bra batteritid
+ låg energiförbrukning
+ skaplig samtalskvalitet
+ IP68-certifiering
+ överkomligt pris
+ ren Android
+ skärm med hög kontrast

Emot

- gryniga, suddiga foton
- lång laddningstid
- ingen LTE
- ganska låg prestanda
- skärmen är relativt oskyddad
- bara touch-knappar för inmatning
- utdaterad mjukvara
- skärmen har en märkbar färgton
Recension: Cubot King Kong
Recension: Cubot King Kong

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Låt inte Cubot King Kong lura dig: Trots sitt tunga hölje är skärmen knappt skyddad och dom virtuella touch-knapparna gör den svår att använda med handskar. Den har dessutom låg prestanda och lämpar sig inte för användning i ljusa miljöer. Andra tillverkare erbjuder enheter som verkligen förtjänar namnet "utomhus-telefon". Men låt det vara sagt att enheten har IP68-certifiering, lång batteritid och ren Android.

Här kan du dock inte förvänta dig mer. Kameran tar som bäst urvattnade bilder och högtalaren är inte värd sitt namn - den är väldigt tyst, även om ljudet den producerar låter okej. Avsaknaden av LTE-stöd kan vara avgörande för många.

En del begränsningar går inte att undvika i det här prisskiktet. Trots detta så har Cubot King Kong väldigt bra batteritid och är vatten- och damm-beständig.

Om du letar efter en smartphone som du kan använda i tuffa miljöer kan du vilja spendera lite mer pengar och istället få en kraftfullare enhet som kan användas överallt. Men om du bara är klumpig och den tunga designen tilltalar dig så får du en skaplig smartphone till ett lågt pris.

Cubot King Kong - 06/19/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Design
84%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
87%
Anslutningar
31 / 60 → 51%
Vikt
87%
Batteri
100%
Skärm
82%
Spelprestanda
4 / 63 → 7%
Programprestanda
24 / 70 → 34%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
39%
Medel
66%
76%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Cubot King Kong Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Florian Wimmer, 2018-06-26 (Update: 2018-06-26)