Test: CAT S61 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Name: CAT S61
Brand: CAT

Multifunktionell. Den robusta CAT S61 tystar munnen på alla som påstår att det inte sker någon innovation på smartphone-marknaden. Men den inbyggda värmekameran, laseravståndsmätaren och den automatiska mätningen av luftkvaliteten inomhus, telefonens viktigaste funktioner, är troligen mest till nytta för proffsanvändare.

Florian Wimmer, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 09/27/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

CAT S61 (S Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 8 x 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 508

Minne

4 GB

Skärm

5.20 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 424 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 48 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm, Kortläsare: MicroSD upp till 256 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerationssensor, gyroskop, närhetssensor, kompass, barometer, termometer, hygrometer, luftkvalitetssensor (VOC), USB-C, infraröd kamera, laseravståndsmätare

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1700/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41), LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 13 x 163 x 78

Batteri

17.1 Wh, 4500 mAh Litiumjon, Quick Charge

Operativsystem

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix Fasjämförande-AF, dubbel LED-blixt, Video @ 2160p och 30 fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix

Övrigt

Högtalare: Monohögtalare på den nedre kanten, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Snabbladdare, USB-kabel, Measure, Air, App Toolbox, FLIR, 24 Månader Garanti, Skyddad enligt IP68 & IP69K; MIL SPEC 810G, Temperatur-resistans: klarar temperaturförändringar mellan -25 °C (-13 °F) och 55 °C (131 °F) i upp till 24 timmar; vibrationsresistans: Kategori 4; skydd mot fukt och salt dimma; LTE Cat. 13 600 Mbps (nedladdning) Cat. 12 150 Mbps (uppladdning); SAR-värde: 0.416 W/kg (huvud), 1.594 W/kg (kropp), fanless, ruggedized

Vikt

250 g, Strömförsörjning: 91 g

Pris

899 Kr

Länkar

CAT hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 8 A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)	354 MBit/s +4%
CAT S61 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	341 MBit/s
Crosscall Action-X3 Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	201 MBit/s -41%
Land Rover Explore Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 64 GB eMMC Flash	62.7 MBit/s -82%
CAT S41 Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 32 GB eMMC Flash	38.7 MBit/s -89%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 8 A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)	915 MBit/s +170%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s +11%
CAT S61 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	339 MBit/s
Crosscall Action-X3 Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	199 MBit/s -41%
Land Rover Explore Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 64 GB eMMC Flash	61.1 MBit/s -82%
CAT S41 Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 32 GB eMMC Flash	38.1 MBit/s -89%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


675 cd/m²	705 cd/m²	667 cd/m²
670 cd/m²	693 cd/m²	678 cd/m²
631 cd/m²	669 cd/m²	658 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 705 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 671.8 cd/m² Minimum: 27.9 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 693 cd/m²
Kontrast: 900:1 (Svärta: 0.77 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.23 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
84.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.834

	CAT S61 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20	Land Rover Explore IPS, 1920x1080, 5.00	Crosscall Action-X3 IPS, 1280x800, 5.00	Apple iPhone 8 IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.70	CAT S41 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.00
Screen		-15%	3%	38%	-7%
Brightness middle	693	633 -9%	417 -40%	604 -13%	537 -23%
Brightness	672	604 -10%	425 -37%	580 -14%	506 -25%
Brightness Distribution	90	91 1%	91 1%	91 1%	86 -4%
Black Level *	0.77	0.84 -9%	0.29 62%	0.44 43%	0.9 -17%
Contrast	900	754 -16%	1438 60%	1373 53%	597 -34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.23	6.41 -23%	7.12 -36%	1.2 77%	5.02 4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.18	11.88 -17%	10.19 -0%	2.3 77%	7.98 22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.9	9.2 -33%	6.1 12%	1.6 77%	5.3 23%
Gamma	2.834 ^78%	1.927 ^114%	2.687 ^82%	2.25 ^98%	2.154 ^102%
CCT	7137 ^91%	6165 ^105%	7687 ^85%	6688 ^97%	7226 ^90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2358 Hz

≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
CAT S61	44128 Points
Land Rover Explore	75939 Points +72%
Crosscall Action-X3	42924 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 8	204270 Points +363%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (44128 - 73617, n=12)	68642 Points +56%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
CAT S61	90674 Points
Land Rover Explore	107921 Points +19%
Crosscall Action-X3	57023 Points -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90674, n=11)	89396 Points -1%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
CAT S61	5548 Points
Land Rover Explore	5041 Points -9%
Crosscall Action-X3	4665 Points -16%
CAT S41	4778 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4948 - 6264, n=13)	5632 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +172%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
CAT S61	4748 Points
Land Rover Explore	4580 Points -4%
Crosscall Action-X3	3666 Points -23%
CAT S41	Points -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4636 - 5987, n=12)	4968 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +129%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
CAT S61	1526 Points
Land Rover Explore	1352 Points -11%
Crosscall Action-X3	Points -100%
CAT S41	1255 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1152 - 1570, n=13)	1479 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points +277%
System (sort by value)
CAT S61	3283 Points
Land Rover Explore	2889 Points -12%
CAT S41	2372 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1763 - 3319, n=13)	3147 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points +195%
Memory (sort by value)
CAT S61	1228 Points
Land Rover Explore	1230 Points 0%
CAT S41	1269 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (838 - 1405, n=13)	1199 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points +410%
Graphics (sort by value)
CAT S61	1499 Points
Land Rover Explore	1222 Points -18%
CAT S41	1126 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1409 - 1523, n=13)	1494 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points +849%
Web (sort by value)
CAT S61	896 Points
Land Rover Explore	769 Points -14%
CAT S41	731 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (666 - 936, n=13)	859 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points +67%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
CAT S61	885 Points
Land Rover Explore	1739 Points +96%
Crosscall Action-X3	634 Points -28%
Apple iPhone 8	4162 Points +370%
CAT S41	869 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (710 - 885, n=13)	853 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)	5228 Points +491%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
CAT S61	4202 Points
Land Rover Explore	4927 Points +17%
Crosscall Action-X3	2360 Points -44%
Apple iPhone 8	10380 Points +147%
CAT S41	3414 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2246 - 4234, n=13)	4009 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)	14045 Points +234%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
CAT S61	3930 Points
Land Rover Explore	3605 Points -8%
Crosscall Action-X3	2045 Points -48%
CAT S41	2888 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2910 - 3956, n=12)	3718 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)	10872 Points +177%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
CAT S61	16808 Points
Land Rover Explore	14919 Points -11%
Crosscall Action-X3	9231 Points -45%
Apple iPhone 8	62006 Points +269%
CAT S41	13404 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (15466 - 17032, n=13)	16750 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
CAT S61	18375 Points
Land Rover Explore	17173 Points -7%
Crosscall Action-X3	9342 Points -49%
Apple iPhone 8	112424 Points +512%
CAT S41	13844 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (16508 - 18635, n=13)	18279 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
CAT S61	12945 Points
Land Rover Explore	10223 Points -21%
Crosscall Action-X3	8864 Points -32%
Apple iPhone 8	24131 Points +86%
CAT S41	12063 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (12437 - 13217, n=13)	12963 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
CAT S61	1318 Points
Land Rover Explore	1186 Points -10%
Crosscall Action-X3	561 Points -57%
CAT S41	969 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1315 - 1374, n=13)	1341 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points +186%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
CAT S61	1234 Points
Land Rover Explore	1103 Points -11%
Crosscall Action-X3	492 Points -60%
CAT S41	909 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1234 - 1289, n=13)	1258 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points +239%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
CAT S61	1729 Points
Land Rover Explore	1610 Points -7%
Crosscall Action-X3	1099 Points -36%
Apple iPhone 8	1774 Points +3%
CAT S41	1261 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1687 - 1816, n=13)	1746 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points +78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
CAT S61	814 Points
Land Rover Explore	995 Points +22%
Crosscall Action-X3	284 Points -65%
Apple iPhone 8	2421 Points +197%
CAT S41	707 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (809 - 839, n=13)	825 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=106, last 2 years)	2738 Points +236%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
CAT S61	708 Points
Land Rover Explore	892 Points +26%
Crosscall Action-X3	234 Points -67%
Apple iPhone 8	2581 Points +265%
CAT S41	613 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (704 - 729, n=13)	718 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=106, last 2 years)	2733 Points +286%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
CAT S61	1711 Points
Land Rover Explore	1668 Points -3%
Crosscall Action-X3	1098 Points -36%
Apple iPhone 8	1989 Points +16%
CAT S41	1529 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1631 - 1822, n=13)	1734 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=106, last 2 years)	3156 Points +84%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
CAT S61	29 fps
Land Rover Explore	33 fps +14%
Crosscall Action-X3	26 fps -10%
Apple iPhone 8	119.8 fps +313%
CAT S41	23 fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (25 - 31, n=13)	29.2 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)	84.6 fps +192%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
CAT S61	29 fps
Land Rover Explore	32 fps +10%
Crosscall Action-X3	15 fps -48%
Apple iPhone 8	161.3 fps +456%
CAT S41	23 fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=13)	29.7 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)	247 fps +752%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
CAT S61	13 fps
Land Rover Explore	19 fps +46%
Crosscall Action-X3	14 fps +8%
Apple iPhone 8	114.5 fps +781%
CAT S41	10 fps -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (11 - 15, n=13)	13.8 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)	72.2 fps +455%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
CAT S61	14 fps
Land Rover Explore	16 fps +14%
Crosscall Action-X3	6.7 fps -52%
Apple iPhone 8	70.8 fps +406%
CAT S41	10 fps -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 14, n=13)	13.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)	140.6 fps +904%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
CAT S61	5.3 fps
Land Rover Explore	13 fps +145%
Crosscall Action-X3	10 fps +89%
Apple iPhone 8	109.7 fps +1970%
CAT S41	6.8 fps +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 11, n=13)	9.36 fps +77%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)	60.9 fps +1049%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
CAT S61	9.7 fps
Land Rover Explore	12 fps +24%
Crosscall Action-X3	4.4 fps -55%
Apple iPhone 8	54 fps +457%
CAT S41	6.8 fps -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 10, n=13)	9.38 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)	99 fps +921%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
CAT S61	5.4 fps
Land Rover Explore	7.3 fps +35%
Crosscall Action-X3	5.3 fps -2%
CAT S41	4 fps -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4.3 - 6, n=13)	5.48 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)	43.4 fps +704%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
CAT S61	5.5 fps
Land Rover Explore	6.8 fps +24%
Crosscall Action-X3	2.4 fps -56%
CAT S41	4 fps -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=13)	5.48 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)	59.9 fps +989%

Legend

CAT S61 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Land Rover Explore MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Crosscall Action-X3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPhone 8 Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)

CAT S41 Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8	206.7 Points +635%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	104.3 Points +271%
Land Rover Explore (Chrome 67)	48.86 Points +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=12)	28.3 Points +1%
CAT S61 (Chrome 68)	28.14 Points
CAT S41 (Chrome 67)	26.67 Points -5%
Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68)	18.05 Points -36%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8	34163 Points +564%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)	33357 Points +548%
Land Rover Explore (Chrome 67)	9798 Points +90%
CAT S61 (Chrome 68)	5146 Points
CAT S41 (Chrome 67)	5024 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=13)	4963 Points -4%
Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68)	3251 Points -37%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Crosscall Action-X3 (Chrome 68)	13331 ms * -38%
CAT S41 (Chrome 67)	10444 ms * -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10257, n=13)	9702 ms * -0%
CAT S61 (Chrome 68)	9692 ms *
Land Rover Explore (Chrome 67)	4261 ms * +56%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +84%
Apple iPhone 8	731 ms * +92%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone 8	359 Points +212%
Land Rover Explore (Chrome 67)	156 Points +36%
CAT S61 (Chrome 68)	115 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (86 - 117, n=10)	105.9 Points -8%

* ... smaller is better

	CAT S61	Land Rover Explore	Crosscall Action-X3	CAT S41	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-23%	-15%	-31%	18%	753%
Sequential Read 256KB	284.7	237.3 -17%	264.7 -7%	253 -11%	273 ?(95.6 - 704, n=201) -4%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 430%
Sequential Write 256KB	212.2	104.5 -51%	139.3 -34%	117.2 -45%	176.8 ?(40 - 274, n=201) -17%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 427%
Random Read 4KB	44.7	28.7 -36%	47 5%	65.5 47%	59.1 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=201) 32%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 453%
Random Write 4KB	15.1	11.2 -26%	8.4 -44%	12.99 -14%	31.7 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=201) 110%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 1701%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	83.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	75.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -10%	84.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	23.87 -71%	77.4 ?(21.1 - 107.6, n=144) -7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	63.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	66.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 5%	56.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -11%	5 -92%	58.3 ?(11.2 - 83.3, n=144) -8%

Asphalt 9: Legends
	Inställningar	Värde
	High Quality	30 fps
	Standard / low	30 fps

Arena of Valor
	Inställningar	Värde
	min	31 fps
	high HD	31 fps

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


42.4 °C	36.5 °C	33.9 °C
43.3 °C	36.8 °C	33.6 °C
42.2 °C	37.3 °C	34 °C

Max: 43.3 °C
Medel: 37.8 °C


34.2 °C	36.2 °C	42.1 °C
34.3 °C	36 °C	42.5 °C
33.9 °C	36.2 °C	41.3 °C

Max: 42.5 °C
Medel: 37.4 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 47.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

CAT S61 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

CAT S41 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 61.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 61.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 61.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (117.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.2 / 0.9 Watt
Låg belastning	1.4 / 1.9 / 2.6 Watt
Hög belastning	3.5 / 5.6 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	CAT S61 4500 mAh	Land Rover Explore 4000 mAh	Crosscall Action-X3 3500 mAh	Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh	CAT S41 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-13%	-16%	19%	-11%	12%	-2%
Idle Minimum *	1.4	1.2 14%	1.1 21%	0.54 61%	1.4 -0%	0.732 ?(0.35 - 1.4, n=13) 48%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) 36%
Idle Average *	1.9	1.5 21%	1.9 -0%	1.63 14%	2.2 -16%	1.835 ?(1 - 2.31, n=13) 3%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 24%
Idle Maximum *	2.6	3 -15%	2.9 -12%	1.67 36%	2.8 -8%	2.16 ?(1.4 - 3.8, n=13) 17%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 37%
Load Average *	3.5	4.5 -29%	4.8 -37%	2.74 22%	4.1 -17%	3.81 ?(2.82 - 6.2, n=13) -9%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -59%
Load Maximum *	5.6	8.6 -54%	8.4 -50%	7.78 -39%	6.4 -14%	5.62 ?(4.56 - 8, n=13) -0%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -48%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		31tim 31min
WiFi Websurfing		15tim 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16tim 02min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		5tim 41min

	CAT S61 4500 mAh	Land Rover Explore 4000 mAh	Crosscall Action-X3 3500 mAh	Apple iPhone 8 1821 mAh	CAT S41 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-43%	-9%	-30%	3%
Reader / Idle	1891			1629 -14%
H.264	962			698 -27%
WiFi v1.3	923	529 -43%	843 -9%	585 -37%	953 3%
Load	341			202 -41%

För

+ omfattande och praktiska specialfunktioner

+ robust och välskyddat hölje

+ skapligt exakt GPS

+ utmärkt batteritid

+ väldigt ljusstark skärm

+ bra prestanda

+ skapliga kameror

Emot

- bara värd priset om du använder specialfunktionerna

- rejält hölje

- skärm med låg färgprecision

Recenseras: CAT S61. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger.de

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

CAT S61 är förstås en specialist. Med sitt rejäla yttre och väldigt specifika extrafunktioner är den inte riktigt en telefon för alla. Men den som ofta behöver en värmekamera kan tänkas uppskatta att ha en sådan inbyggd. Laseravståndsmätaren fungerar också bra, även om den inte är riktigt lika smidig som en dedikerad enhet.

Den som attraheras av en laseravståndsmätare, mätning av luftkvaliteten och en värmekamera kommer få ett mångsidigt verktyg i form av CAT S61.

Det är förstås olika vad som är viktigt för proffs och vad som är viktigt för vanliga konsumenter, men skärmen och kameran på CAT S61 är ganska användbara. På samma sätt är prestandan okej, det finns tillräckligt med lagring och GPS-mottagaren är ganska exakt. Även om CAT S61 kan vara användbar inom många områden så finns det bättre alternativ i det här prisskiktet för den som inte planerar att använda telefonens specialfunktioner: med mer prestanda, mer lagring och bättre kameror. Det finns också billigare robusta telefoner såsom Land Rover Explore och CAT S41, om det specifikt är en robust smartphone du är ute efter.

Totalt sett är CAT S61 en mångsidig enhet som är värd sitt pris, så länge du planerar att använda dess specialfunktioner.

CAT S61 - 2019-10-16 10/16/2019 v7
Florian Wimmer

Design

83%

Tangentbord

67 / 75 → 89%

Mus

91%

Anslutningar

49 / 70 → 70%

Vikt

87%

Batteri

90%

Skärm

83%

Spelprestanda

10 / 64 → 15%

Programprestanda

45 / 86 → 53%

Temperatur

88%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

56 / 90 → 62%

Camera

71%

Medel

71%

77%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: CAT S61 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Wimmer, 2018-09-27 (Update: 2018-09-27)

Test: CAT S61 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

CAT S61 audio analysis

CAT S41 audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare