Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL - Färgglad laptop med robust hölje (Sammanfattning)

Livsstilslaptop. Asus kryddar till det visuella på VivoBook S14 och levererar en robust enhet med ett flertal färgalternativ. Dessutom har den ett antal egenskaper som till viss del utesluter varandra. I vår recension kan du se vad mer VivoBook S14 har att erbjuda.
Comet Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL (VivoBook S14 S433 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-10510U 4 x 1.8 - 4.9 GHz, Comet Lake-U
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 2048 MB VRAM, Kärna: 1519 MHz, Minne: 1752 MHz, GP108 A1, NVIDIA 441.45, Intel UHD Graphics 620
Minne
16 GB 
, Dubbla kanaler
Skärm
14.00 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 157 PPI, Chi Mei CMN14D4, IPS, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Hårddisk
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), 512 GB 
, 420 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Intel Comet Lake PCH-LP - cAVS
Anslutningar
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 HDMI, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare
Nätverk
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 16 x 325 x 214
Batteri
50 Wh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: 0.9 MP, 16:9 (1280x720)
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2, Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, ASUS Splendid, ASUS Tru2life Video, ASUS AudioWizard, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
1.4 kg, Strömförsörjning: 203 g
Pris
1100 Kr
Länkar
Asus hemsida
Asus kategori
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.7 %
07/2020
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
i7-10510U, GeForce MX250		1.4 kg16 mm14.00"1920x1080
86.5 %
06/2020
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
R7 4700U, Vega 7		1.2 kg16.55 mm14.00"1920x1080
85.6 %
04/2020
SCHENKER VIA 14
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620		1.1 kg16.5 mm14.00"1920x1080
77.8 %
01/2020
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250		1.6 kg18 mm14.00"1920x1080
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T

Storleksjämförelse

❌
327 mm 226 mm 18 mm 1.6 kg325 mm 214 mm 16 mm 1.4 kg323.4 mm 218.9 mm 16.55 mm 1.2 kg322 mm 216.8 mm 16.5 mm 1.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Portkonfiguration

Vänster: Nätadapter, HDMI, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Typ A, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Typ C, 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning
Vänster: Nätadapter, HDMI, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Typ A, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Typ C, 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning
Höger: microSD-kortläsare, 2x USB 2.0
Höger: microSD-kortläsare, 2x USB 2.0
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Multimedia
  (17.6 - 205, n=66, last 2 years)
93.3 MB/s +297%
SCHENKER VIA 14
 
77.5 MB/s +230%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s +36%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
23.5 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Multimedia
  (16.8 - 266, n=62, last 2 years)
122.6 MB/s +385%
SCHENKER VIA 14
  (Toshiba Exceria pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
87.1 MB/s +244%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33 MB/s +30%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
25.3 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER VIA 14
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1472 (1403min - 1492max) MBit/s +137%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s +87%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
928 MBit/s +49%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
660 (642min - 680max) MBit/s +6%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
621 (554min - 657max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER VIA 14
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1532 (788min - 1670max) MBit/s +75%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s +44%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1070 MBit/s +22%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
904 (879min - 923max) MBit/s +3%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
875 (787min - 909max) MBit/s
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600Tooltip
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø875 (787-909)
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø904 (879-923)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1506 (788-1670)
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø621 (554-657)
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø660 (642-680)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1471 (1403-1492)
ColorChecker
14.9 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
6 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL: 13.65 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.42 ∆E
201
cd/m²		236
cd/m²		238
cd/m²
187
cd/m²		220
cd/m²		217
cd/m²
163
cd/m²		195
cd/m²		177
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
Chi Mei CMN14D4 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 238 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 203.8 cd/m² Minimum: 12.1 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 68 %
Mitt på batteriet: 216 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1419:1 (Svärta: 0.155 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.23 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.4
ΔE Greyscale 3.77 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
62% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.99% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.55% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Chi Mei CMN14D4, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00		Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AU Optronics B140HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00		SCHENKER VIA 14
B140HAN06.2, a-Si AHVA-IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00		HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
AUO543D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Display
-10%
65%
59%
Display P3 Coverage
41.55
37.2
-10%
69.8
68%
66.5
60%
sRGB Coverage
62
55.9
-10%
99.6
61%
98.4
59%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
42.99
38.43
-11%
71.6
67%
68.2
59%
Response Times
-13%
-63%
-51%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
34 ?(16, 18)
41 ?(19, 22)
-21%
60.8 ?(28.4, 32.4)
-79%
60.8 ?(29.2, 31.6)
-79%
Response Time Black / White *
24 ?(14, 10)
25 ?(14, 11)
-4%
35.2 ?(17.2, 18)
-47%
29.6 ?(13.2, 16.4)
-23%
PWM Frequency
250 ?(20)
Screen
3%
44%
27%
Brightness middle
220
269
22%
335
52%
395
80%
Brightness
204
244
20%
309
51%
375
84%
Brightness Distribution
68
83
22%
84
24%
91
34%
Black Level *
0.155
0.23
-48%
0.17
-10%
0.26
-68%
Contrast
1419
1170
-18%
1971
39%
1519
7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.23
4.94
6%
2.3
56%
5.92
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
21.51
20.37
5%
5
77%
9.79
54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.4
5.03
-14%
1
77%
0.91
79%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.77
1.71
55%
3.9
-3%
6.69
-77%
Gamma
2.35 94%
2.52 87%
2.19 100%
2.78 79%
CCT
6666 98%
6535 99%
6556 99%
7596 86%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
40
35
-12%
65.5
64%
63
58%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
62
56
-10%
99.6
61%
98
58%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-7% / -2%
15% / 35%
12% / 23%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

055110165220275330385440495550605660715770825880935990Tooltip
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel Core i7-10510U: Ø568 (535.78-642.12)
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Ryzen 7 4700U: Ø932 (907.83-1035.01)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel Core i5-10210U: Ø574 (555-722)
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø625 (592.25-691)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 812, n=97, last 2 years)
646 Points +43%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
474 Points +5%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
466 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
451 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (362 - 497, n=37)
437 Points -3%
SCHENKER VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
395 Points -12%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (1783 - 11768, n=97, last 2 years)
5352 Points +251%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
2401 Points +57%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1543 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
1525 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (1015 - 1897, n=38)
1412 Points -7%
SCHENKER VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
1150 Points -25%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (142.6 - 308, n=99, last 2 years)
251 Points +41%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
190 Points +7%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
180 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (113 - 202, n=42)
178.4 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
177.6 Points
SCHENKER VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
154 Points -13%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (785 - 4703, n=106, last 2 years)
2321 Points +262%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1035 Points +61%
SCHENKER VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
722 (555min - 722max) Points +12%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
691 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (482 - 856, n=45)
666 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
642 (535.78min - 642.12max) Points
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
1004 Seconds * -28%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (628 - 1051, n=31)
796 Seconds * -2%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
782 Seconds *
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
524 Seconds * +33%
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 662, n=95, last 2 years)
265 Seconds * +66%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7163, n=90, last 2 years)
5639 MIPS +20%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
4681 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (3747 - 4981, n=31)
4591 MIPS -2%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
4292 MIPS -8%
SCHENKER VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
4282 MIPS -9%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Multimedia
  (20166 - 119900, n=90, last 2 years)
57411 MIPS +248%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
26652 MIPS +62%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (12196 - 21298, n=31)
17704 MIPS +7%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
16487 MIPS
SCHENKER VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
15424 MIPS -6%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (926 - 2342, n=100, last 2 years)
1758 Points +45%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
1211 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (977 - 1287, n=31)
1197 Points -1%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1101 Points -9%
SCHENKER VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
1089 Points -10%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (3828 - 23059, n=100, last 2 years)
11372 Points +206%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
4792 Points +29%
SCHENKER VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
3831 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
3721 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (2474 - 4484, n=31)
3687 Points -1%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.99 - 30.5, n=88, last 2 years)
15.6 fps +239%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
7.81 fps +70%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (3.41 - 6.04, n=31)
4.65 fps +1%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
4.6 fps
SCHENKER VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
3.69 fps -20%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (50.7 - 77.8, n=27)
59.9 s * -7%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
59.8 s * -7%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
55.8 s *
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 84.9, n=92, last 2 years)
48 s * +14%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
SCHENKER VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
0.712 sec * -12%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (0.637 - 0.81, n=28)
0.68 sec * -7%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U
0.638 sec *
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
0.629 sec * +1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3826 - 0.723, n=90, last 2 years)
0.4811 sec * +25%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
177.6 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
642 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
75.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Hjälp
PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Multimedia
  (4635 - 8670, n=85, last 2 years)
6602 Points +68%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
4886 Points +24%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
4289 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (3861 - 5409, n=11)
4243 Points +8%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
3933 Points
SCHENKER VIA 14
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002
3810 Points -3%
Essentials
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=85, last 2 years)
10473 Points +26%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
9244 Points +11%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
8912 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (8021 - 9764, n=11)
8892 Points +7%
SCHENKER VIA 14
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002
8791 Points +6%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
8310 Points
Productivity
Average of class Multimedia
  (5845 - 11186, n=85, last 2 years)
8709 Points +27%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
7433 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (6625 - 7972, n=11)
7331 Points +7%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
7273 Points +6%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
6845 Points
SCHENKER VIA 14
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002
6450 Points -6%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia
  (4688 - 13548, n=85, last 2 years)
8686 Points +199%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
4709 Points +62%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
3233 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (2621 - 5547, n=11)
3225 Points +11%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
2903 Points
SCHENKER VIA 14
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002
2649 Points -9%
PCMark 10 Score
3933 poäng
Hjälp
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER VIA 14
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002
2339 μs * -308%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1087 μs * -90%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
573 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)		Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB		SCHENKER VIA 14
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002		HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02		Average Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
 		Average of class Multimedia
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
13%
74%
63%
-4%
107%
Write 4K
124.9
98.8
-21%
201
61%
181.6
45%
110.3 ?(64.8 - 162.7, n=11)
-12%
170.2 ?(99.3 - 319, n=66, last 2 years)
36%
Read 4K
147.9
32.44
-78%
60.2
-59%
57.4
-61%
131.9 ?(98 - 190.5, n=11)
-11%
66.2 ?(30.7 - 96, n=66, last 2 years)
-55%
Write Seq
753
1582
110%
2471
228%
1982
163%
569 ?(450 - 994, n=11)
-24%
2761 ?(473 - 4443, n=38, last 2 years)
267%
Read Seq
1223
1471
20%
2104
72%
1899
55%
1372 ?(1223 - 1624, n=11)
12%
2981 ?(1642 - 4875, n=38, last 2 years)
144%
Write 4K Q32T1
369.2
375.4
2%
323.6
-12%
509
38%
387 ?(237 - 556, n=11)
5%
479 ?(292 - 777, n=66, last 2 years)
30%
Read 4K Q32T1
358.1
491.9
37%
551
54%
545
52%
375 ?(287 - 531, n=11)
5%
550 ?(310 - 972, n=66, last 2 years)
54%
Write Seq Q32T1
1057
1574
49%
3407
222%
3072
191%
1141 ?(686 - 1320, n=11)
8%
4002 ?(490 - 6779, n=66, last 2 years)
279%
Read Seq Q32T1
2738
2329
-15%
3475
27%
3281
20%
2439 ?(2092 - 2738, n=11)
-11%
5393 ?(2108 - 7147, n=66, last 2 years)
97%
AS SSD
37%
215%
166%
-3%
195%
Seq Read
957
1960
105%
2488
160%
2762
189%
1056 ?(769 - 1337, n=12)
10%
4005 ?(1192 - 5730, n=84, last 2 years)
318%
Seq Write
353.1
1547
338%
2615
641%
2493
606%
429 ?(305 - 836, n=12)
21%
2553 ?(388 - 5175, n=84, last 2 years)
623%
4K Read
62.4
31.56
-49%
72.8
17%
52.1
-17%
61.9 ?(20 - 76, n=12)
-1%
62.7 ?(30 - 98.5, n=84, last 2 years)
0%
4K Write
122.8
116.6
-5%
172.3
40%
147.5
20%
105 ?(18 - 129.7, n=12)
-14%
188.5 ?(66.5 - 328, n=84, last 2 years)
54%
4K-64 Read
386.2
454.7
18%
2052
431%
1473
281%
459 ?(276 - 789, n=12)
19%
1231 ?(413 - 2989, n=84, last 2 years)
219%
4K-64 Write
605
262.1
-57%
1746
189%
1456
141%
644 ?(270 - 948, n=12)
6%
2123 ?(281 - 4265, n=84, last 2 years)
251%
Access Time Read *
0.107
0.06
44%
0.094
12%
0.1019 ?(0.065 - 0.23, n=12)
5%
0.0578 ?(0.018 - 0.168, n=84, last 2 years)
46%
Access Time Write *
0.046
0.034
26%
0.022
52%
0.03
35%
0.09417 ?(0.044 - 0.249, n=12)
-105%
0.05992 ?(0.013 - 0.414, n=84, last 2 years)
-30%
Score Read
544
682
25%
2373
336%
1801
231%
627 ?(389 - 975, n=12)
15%
1695 ?(669 - 3501, n=84, last 2 years)
212%
Score Write
763
533
-30%
2180
186%
1853
143%
792 ?(338 - 1117, n=12)
4%
2567 ?(545 - 4813, n=84, last 2 years)
236%
Score Total
1581
1552
-2%
5782
266%
4568
189%
1732 ?(910 - 2594, n=12)
10%
5067 ?(2010 - 9972, n=84, last 2 years)
220%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
25% / 26%
145% / 156%
115% / 123%
-4% / -3%
151% / 158%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2738 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1057 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 358.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 369.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1223 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 753 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 147.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 124.9 MB/s

Kontinuerlig inläsning: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=89, last 2 years)
18929 Points +296%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
4990 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-10510U
4785 Points
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-1065G7
4614 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (3585 - 4942, n=29)
4404 Points -8%
SCHENKER VIA 14
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
1537 Points -68%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=90, last 2 years)
14005 Points +267%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-10510U
3819 Points
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-1065G7
3580 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (2939 - 3885, n=29)
3531 Points -8%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
3134 Points -18%
SCHENKER VIA 14
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
1230 Points -68%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=90, last 2 years)
5310 Points +357%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-10510U
1163 Points
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-1065G7
1105 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (881 - 1169, n=22)
1070 Points -8%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
973 Points -16%
SCHENKER VIA 14
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
357 Points -69%
3DMark 11 Performance
5022 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3460 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
1282 poäng
Hjälp
The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 428, n=64, last 2 years)
205 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (47.4 - 70, n=24)
60.8 fps
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
56.4 (37min) fps
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
51.6 fps
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 327, n=64, last 2 years)
138.6 fps +285%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
36 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (30 - 40, n=27)
35.3 fps -2%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
33.5 (26min) fps -7%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
33.5 fps -7%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 290, n=92, last 2 years)
93.9 fps +347%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
21 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (16.3 - 23.1, n=27)
20.1 fps -4%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
18.8 (15min) fps -10%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
16.5 fps -21%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=99, last 2 years)
50.6 fps +289%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
13 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (9 - 16, n=24)
11.6 fps -11%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
10.9 (8min) fps -16%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
10.7 fps -18%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Multimedia
  (28 - 184.4, n=90, last 2 years)
109.2 fps +53%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
71.3 (62min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (8.6 - 77.4, n=21)
62 fps -13%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
46.4 (41.6min) fps -35%
SCHENKER VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
18.2 (15.8min) fps -74%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 131.1, n=95, last 2 years)
68.4 fps +74%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (9.8 - 52.6, n=17)
39.4 fps 0%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
39.3 fps
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
24.9 fps -37%
SCHENKER VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
9.6 fps -76%
låg med. hög ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 36 21 13
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 102.4 90.5 71.3 63.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 47.7 42.8 39.3

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
31 / 31 / 31.3 dB(A)
Hög belastning
43.4 / 41.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30.7 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.936.633.732.134.132.92541.337.837.134.133.641.33133.63530.932.433.533.6403133.930.930.730.8315031.134.130.731.13131.16329.232.22928.428.629.28026.83026.328.926.726.810030.329.225.326.12530.312525.428.926.226.92525.416025.324.924.624.123.825.320024.924.52323.523.224.925026.326.82422.223.226.331529.727.222.222.121.829.740026.12520.820.820.326.150027.326.42020.719.727.3630262519.620.719.72680028.227.218.819.818.528.2100030.329.418.919.318.330.3125030.628.818.219.118.130.6160031.530.118.318.918.131.5200033.732.118.218.818.133.7250033.831.918.319.21833.8315033.231.318.318.618.533.2400031.229.118.418.518.531.2500032.53018.418.618.532.5630032.229.418.518.618.632.2800030.127.118.518.618.630.11000024.221.818.618.518.624.21250021.92018.518.51921.91600021.219.418.618.719.221.2SPL43.441.63131.430.943.4N4.43.81.51.61.54.4median 29.7median 27.2median 18.6median 19.2median 18.6median 29.7Delta3.12.41.71.41.73.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus VivoBook S14 S433FL
Hög belastning
 38.5 °C43 °C36.3 °C 
 36.6 °C41.1 °C34 °C 
 33.2 °C30.6 °C31.4 °C 
Max: 43 °C
Medel: 36.1 °C
40.2 °C44.8 °C40.4 °C
36.5 °C39.4 °C37.6 °C
32.8 °C34.5 °C34.5 °C
Max: 44.8 °C
Medel: 37.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  46.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 23.9 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.2 °C / 91.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.4 °C / -8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.334.133.32530.733.630.73132.233.532.24030.330.830.35031.73131.76328.728.628.78029.226.729.210036.82536.812542.92542.916041.323.841.320034.523.234.525047.223.247.231554.421.854.440062.820.362.850065.919.765.963065.119.765.180066.318.566.3100070.218.370.2125066.918.166.9160064.718.164.7200063.718.163.7250064.61864.6315060.918.560.9400056.418.556.4500059.718.559.7630057.818.657.8800064.118.664.11000063.318.663.31250057.31957.31600060.919.260.9SPL76.330.976.3N38.21.538.2median 60.9median 18.6median 60.9Delta6.71.76.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus VivoBook S14 S433FLApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.5 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 2.4 / 4.2 / 7.8 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 57 / 64 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
SCHENKER VIA 14
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 73 Wh
843 min +64%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
R7 4700U, Vega 7, 48.85 Wh
715 min +39%
Average of class Multimedia
  (274 - 1204, n=95, last 2 years)
572 min +11%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL
i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh
514 min
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh
368 min -28%
Batteritid
WiFi Websurfing
8tim 34min

För

+ Stabilt hölje
+ Passar för många olika typer av applikationer
+ Bra batteritid

Emot

- Långsam microSD-kortläsare
- Skärmen kunde haft högre ljusstyrka
- Det går att höra ett visst spoltjut

Omdöme - Mångsidig livsstilslaptop

Recension av Asus VivoBook S14. Recensionsex från Asus Germany
Recension av Asus VivoBook S14. Recensionsex från Asus Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Asus VivoBook S14 visade sig vara en riktigt mångsidig laptop i vårt test. Den har mer än tillräckligt med prestanda för kontorsapplikationer och prestandan från ett Nvidia GeForce MX250 räcker också för den som vill spela ett spel då och då. Tillsammans med bra batteritid och liten storlek är denna 14-tumslaptop dessutom en bra mobil kollega.  

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL är en bra allt-i-allo som presterar bra i många situationer.

Det enda vi kan klaga på är den långsamma microSD-kortläsaren och tangentbordet, som var lite för mjukt för vår smak. I övrigt är konfigurationen definitivt tillräcklig för datorns pris. Men känsliga användare skulle kunna få problem med PWM på låga ljusstyrkenivåer samt ett visst spoltjut som uppstår när nätadaptern är ansluten. Vill man ha en fingeravtrycksläsare får man dessutom vara utan ett numeriskt tangentbord, eller tvärtom.

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL - 07/20/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Design
85 / 98 → 87%
Tangentbord
77%
Mus
87%
Anslutningar
51 / 80 → 64%
Vikt
70 / 20-72 → 97%
Batteri
83 / 95 → 87%
Skärm
79%
Spelprestanda
64 / 90 → 71%
Programprestanda
85 / 90 → 94%
Temperatur
90%
Ljudnivå
85 / 95 → 89%
Audio
59%
Camera
32 / 85 → 37%
Medel
73%
81%
Multimedia - Vägt medel

More articles related to this device

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL (VivoBook S14 S433 Serie)

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL - Färgglad laptop med robust hölje (Sammanfattning)
Mike Wobker, 2020-07-26 (Update: 2020-07-26)