Notebookcheck

Test: Aorus X5 v7 (i7-7820HK, GTX 1070, UHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Christian Hintze (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 10/25/2017

4K vs. batteri. Aorus har gjort flera förbättringar sen förra årets modell av X5: 4K skärm, Thunderbolt 3 och en Kaby Lake CPU är bara några av dom trevliga tilläggen. Kan X5 v7 förbättra sig från sin föregångares poäng (83%) eller kanske till och med nå första plats bland tunna spellaptops? Vi ska försöka ta reda på det i vår recension.

Aorus X5 v7 (X5 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-7820HK @ 4.1 GHz
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Kärna: 1463 MHz, Minne: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 382.66, No Optimus
Minne
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2400, Dual-Kanal, 2 av 4 platser upptagna, 64 GB max
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 3840x2160 pixlar 282 PPI, AU Optronics B156ZAN02.3 (AUO23EB), IPS, UHD, G-Sync, 60 Hz, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel HM175 (Skylake PCH-H)
Hårddisk
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, 256 GB 
, SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @ 7200 rpm. enhetsplatser: 2x M.2 Typ 2280 (SATA-III eller PCIe/NVMe) & 1x 2.5-tum
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Anslutningar
4 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: hörlurar, mikrofon, Kortläsare: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Nätverk
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 23 x 390 x 272
Batteri
94 Wh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2x 1.5-watt högtalare, 2x 2-watt woofer, Tangentbord: chiclet RGB Fusion, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 200-watt nätadapter, USB-sticka med drivrutiner, Adobe Reader XI, Command and Control, CyberLink PowerDVD 12, Killer Performance Suite, MS Office 365 Testversion, XSplit Broadcaster Testversion, XSplit Gamecaster Testversion, 24 Månader Garanti, 12 månader på batteriet, 30 dagar för pixelfel på skärmen
Vikt
2.6 kg, Strömförsörjning: 714 g
Pris
2700 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Left: Kensington, Mini DP, Thunderbolt 3, USB-C 3.1 Gen2, headphone, microphone
Left: Kensington, Mini DP, Thunderbolt 3, USB-C 3.1 Gen2, headphone, microphone
Right: SD-card reader, 2x USB-A 3.0, HDMI
Right: SD-card reader, 2x USB-A 3.0, HDMI
Front: control LEDs
Front: control LEDs
Back: power supply, 2x USB-A 3.0, LAN
Back: power supply, 2x USB-A 3.0, LAN
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus X5 v7
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
201 MB/s ∼100%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
153 MB/s ∼76% -24%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80.63 MB/s ∼40% -60%
Aorus X5 v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79.9 MB/s ∼40% -60%
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼39% -61%
Gigabyte P56XT
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼38% -62%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus X5 v7
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
244 MB/s ∼100%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
209 MB/s ∼86% -14%
Aorus X5 v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
90.3 MB/s ∼37% -63%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89.85 MB/s ∼37% -63%
Gigabyte P56XT
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s ∼36% -64%
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼36% -64%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
677 MBit/s ∼100% +54%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
675 MBit/s ∼100% +53%
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
674 MBit/s ∼100% +53%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
669 MBit/s ∼99% +52%
Aorus X5 v7
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
441 MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
631 MBit/s ∼100% +27%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
579 MBit/s ∼92% +17%
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
513 MBit/s ∼81% +3%
Aorus X5 v7
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
496 MBit/s ∼79%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
343 MBit/s ∼54% -31%
292
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 307 cd/m² Medel: 296.9 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 307 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1023:1 (Svärta: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.72 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.79 | - Ø
92% sRGB (Argyll) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.42
Aorus X5 v7
AU Optronics B156ZAN02.3 (AUO23EB), 3840x2160, 15.6
Aorus X5 v6
2880x1620, 15.6
Gigabyte P56XT
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
AUO B156HTN05.2 (AUO52ED), 1920x1080, 15.6
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
ID: AUO52ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HTN05.2, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
1%
11%
50%
60%
11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44 (21.2, 22.8)
34 (19, 25)
23%
37.2 (18.4, 18.8)
15%
24 (12, 12)
45%
20.8 (11.6, 9.2)
53%
37 (16, 21)
16%
Response Time Black / White *
26.4 (14, 12.4)
32 (8, 24)
-21%
24.8 (14, 10.8)
6%
12 (4, 8)
55%
8.8 (6.8, 2)
67%
25 (4, 21)
5%
PWM Frequency
198.4
20000 (95)
Screen
-2%
-13%
-39%
-53%
-1%
Brightness
297
271
-9%
280
-6%
365
23%
409
38%
311
5%
Brightness Distribution
92
83
-10%
87
-5%
85
-8%
94
2%
85
-8%
Black Level *
0.3
0.249
17%
0.32
-7%
0.5
-67%
0.86
-187%
0.3
-0%
Contrast
1023
1126
10%
941
-8%
714
-30%
484
-53%
1033
1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.72
4.94
-5%
6.21
-32%
9.93
-110%
8.4
-78%
4.82
-2%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.79
5.13
-7%
6.08
-27%
10.32
-115%
11.2
-134%
3.94
18%
Gamma
2.42 99%
2.26 106%
2.31 104%
2.11 114%
2.23 108%
2.45 98%
CCT
7690 85%
7433 87%
7375 88%
10096 64%
10036 65%
6877 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
55.9
-7%
55
-8%
58
-3%
57.2
-5%
54
-10%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92
85.9
-7%
84
-9%
89
-3%
87.3
-5%
83
-10%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-1% / -2%
-1% / -8%
6% / -21%
4% / -30%
5% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 22.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8568 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
174 Points ∼100%
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
171 Points ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼93% -7%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼92% -8%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼92% -8%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
156 Points ∼90% -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
827 Points ∼100%
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
790 Points ∼96% -4%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
772 Points ∼93% -7%
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points ∼90% -10%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
739 Points ∼89% -11%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
731 Points ∼88% -12%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.98 Points ∼100%
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.94 Points ∼98% -2%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.84 Points ∼93% -7%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.84 Points ∼93% -7%
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points ∼91% -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.18 Points ∼100%
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
8.9 Points ∼97% -3%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.44 Points ∼92% -8%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.17 Points ∼89% -11%
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.16 Points ∼89% -11%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points ∼89% -11%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8652 Points ∼100%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
32769 Points ∼100%
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6836 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
32769 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
8652 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
9.18 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
81.95 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.98 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
174 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
127.13 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
827 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
5406 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte P56XT
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256
5261 Points ∼97%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5192 Points ∼96%
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5180 Points ∼96%
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
5053 Points ∼93%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5065 Points ∼100% +7%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
5011 Points ∼99% +6%
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4828 Points ∼95% +2%
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4718 Points ∼93%
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
4320 Points ∼85% -8%
Gigabyte P56XT
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256
4239 Points ∼84% -10%
PCMark 10 - Score
Gigabyte P56XT
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256
5021 Points ∼100%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4718 poäng
Hjälp
Aorus X5 v7
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Aorus X5 v6
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
3%
14%
2%
-47%
Write 4k QD32
555.5
358.7
-35%
546.3
-2%
511.1
-8%
257.9
-54%
Read 4k QD32
697.2
687.9
-1%
667.8
-4%
524.3
-25%
388.4
-44%
Write 4k
137.8
158.8
15%
177.5
29%
152.7
11%
122.8
-11%
Read 4k
44
52.95
20%
59.11
34%
58.79
34%
38.55
-12%
Write 512
1101
1221
11%
1216
10%
1132
3%
286.9
-74%
Read 512
1086
989.5
-9%
872.6
-20%
840
-23%
462
-57%
Write Seq
1076
1275
18%
1635
52%
1521
41%
422.8
-61%
Read Seq
1479
1565
6%
1718
16%
1219
-18%
521.4
-65%
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Sequential Read: 1479 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1076 MB/s
512K Read: 1086 MB/s
512K Write: 1101 MB/s
4K Read: 44 MB/s
4K Write: 137.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 697.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 555.5 MB/s
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score
Aorus X5 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
14476 Points ∼100% +5%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
14447 Points ∼100% +4%
Aorus X5 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
13827 Points ∼96%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
13768 Points ∼95% 0%
Gigabyte P56XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
13179 Points ∼91% -5%
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
13129 Points ∼91% -5%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score
Aorus X5 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
30201 Points ∼100%
Aorus X5 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
30162 Points ∼100% 0%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
28943 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
26786 Points ∼89% -11%
Gigabyte P56XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
26099 Points ∼86% -14%
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
24365 Points ∼81% -19%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance
Aorus X5 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
18156 Points ∼100% +4%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17505 Points ∼96% 0%
Aorus X5 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17468 Points ∼96%
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
16383 Points ∼90% -6%
Gigabyte P56XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
15625 Points ∼86% -11%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
15359 Points ∼85% -12%
3DMark 11 Performance
17468 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
30201 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13827 poäng
Hjälp
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
39.19 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
66.3 fps ∼100% +9%
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
61.1 fps ∼92%
Gigabyte P56XT
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
50.2 fps ∼76% -18%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
36.52 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
100.5 fps ∼100% +4%
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
97.4 fps ∼97% 0%
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
96.93 fps ∼96%
Doom
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
53.31 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
139.41 fps ∼100%
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
128.9 fps ∼92% -8%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
126.7 fps ∼91% -9%
låg med. hög ultra4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 264.41192.1286.8161.139.19fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 250183.58117.7496.9336.52fps
Doom (2016) 169.43169.7144.17139.4153.31fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
35 / 36 / 40 dB(A)
Hårddisk
33 dB(A)
Hög belastning
43 / 55 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Aorus X5 v7
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P56XT
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Noise
-1%
4%
-1%
9%
7%
off / environment *
30
29.3
2%
30
-0%
31
-3%
28
7%
30
-0%
Idle Minimum *
35
33.4
5%
34
3%
33
6%
28.5
19%
34
3%
Idle Average *
36
35.2
2%
35
3%
34
6%
29.2
19%
35
3%
Idle Maximum *
40
35.2
12%
39
2%
44
-10%
35.5
11%
36
10%
Load Average *
43
53.3
-24%
39
9%
46
-7%
47
-9%
40
7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49
48
2%
Load Maximum *
55
57.6
-5%
49
11%
52
5%
51
7%
46
16%

* ... smaller is better

 63 °C64 °C45 °C 
 52 °C53 °C44 °C 
 38 °C36 °C35 °C 
Max: 64 °C
Medel: 47.8 °C
52 °C56 °C53 °C
53 °C56 °C56 °C
40 °C43 °C44 °C
Max: 56 °C
Medel: 50.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  57 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Aorus X5 v7
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P56XT
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Heat
-9%
-13%
-3%
2%
18%
Maximum Upper Side *
64
57
11%
65
-2%
49.2
23%
50
22%
40.6
37%
Maximum Bottom *
56
54
4%
71
-27%
62
-11%
52.2
7%
48.4
14%
Idle Upper Side *
29
36.2
-25%
35
-21%
32.4
-12%
33.2
-14%
26.8
8%
Idle Bottom *
30
38
-27%
30
-0%
33
-10%
32.4
-8%
26.4
12%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.3372539.732.83133.1294036.637.35027.828.16327.327.38026.528.710024.932.512522.932.116020.937.220022.348.725021.152.131520.555.640018.760.350018.76263017.865.780017.666.7100017.164.1125017.169.7160017.369.4200017.468.7250017.466315017.964.9400018.259.6500017.962.8630018.264.4800018.364.11000019.161.71250019.261.4160001957.7SPL30.178N1.341.4median 18.3Aorus X5 v7median 62Delta1.45.937.839.434.837.433.634.533.832.43331.634.436.232.732.130.53130.43228.530.22834.427.345.826.255.125.858.124.959.324.963.227.262.325.263.424.969.623.770.423.866.123.774.123.374.623.17523.170.92372.42369.623.163.722.963.723.256.136.3832.751.8median 24.9MSI GS63VR 7RF-228USmedian 63.41.910.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Aorus X5 v7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.98 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.5 / 0.8 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 26 / 31 / 36 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 93 / 240 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus X5 v7
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Gigabyte P56XT
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Power Consumption
-9%
28%
29%
12%
19%
Idle Minimum *
26
25
4%
13
50%
14
46%
22
15%
20
23%
Idle Average *
31
28.9
7%
17
45%
18
42%
24.5
21%
24
23%
Idle Maximum *
36
30.1
16%
22
39%
24
33%
25.2
30%
29
19%
Load Average *
93
167.3
-80%
85
9%
87
6%
97.2
-5%
82
12%
Load Maximum *
240
222.6
7%
208
13%
201
16%
213.8
11%
193
20%
Witcher 3 ultra *
176
154
12%
177.5
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
3tim 28min
Surfa med WLAN v1.3
2tim 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2tim 43min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 24min
Aorus X5 v7
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 94 Wh
Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Gigabyte P56XT
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 91.2 Wh
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 60 Wh
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop),  Wh
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 75 Wh
Battery Runtime
20%
124%
30%
15%
54%
Reader / Idle
208
249
20%
568
173%
204
-2%
377
81%
H.264
163
370
127%
213
31%
252
55%
WiFi v1.3
151
182
21%
384
154%
195
29%
174
15%
246
63%
Load
84
100
19%
120
43%
110
31%
98
17%

För

+ bra 4K-skärm
+ relativt tunn
+ hårdvara med hög prestanda
+ Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0 & miniDP
+ snabb kortläsare
+ överklockningsverktyg
+ makro-knappar

Emot

- hög energiförbrukning
- låg batteritid
- medioker Wi-Fi
- höga temperaturer i WASD-området
The Aorus X5 v7, test unit provided by Gigabyte
The Aorus X5 v7, test unit provided by Gigabyte

Aorus X5 V7 är en bra spelmaskin som har förbättrats avsevärt sen sin föregångare, V6. Den bra 4K-skärmen, dom många portarna inklusive Thunderbolt 3, makroknapparna och Aorus verktyg för överklockning och snabba ändringar av viktiga inställningar är utmärkta tillägg.

Men, det finns några små brister som inkluderar hög energiförbrukning och låg batteritid. Potentiella köpare får själva bestämma om flyttbarhet eller energiförbrukning är viktigt för dom. Temperaturhanteringen kunde också varit bättre, trots det förbättrade kylsystemet - särskilt runt WASD-knapparna, som är så viktiga för gamers.

Aorus X5 V7 kommer göra dom flesta gamers glada då den erbjuder kraftfull hårdvara och bra spelprestanda. Men dess tunna hölje låtsas bara erbjuda hög mobilitet, för hög energiförbrukning och kort batteritid säger något annat.

Allt som allt, Aorus är fortfarande en välgjord spellaptop och det går att se att utvecklare och designers har ansträngt sig för att skapa en så bra dator som möjligt. Men den nya Aorus är inte billig och kostar runt ~22 200 SEK ($2700). Detta gör den till den dyraste enheten bland alla vi jämfört med. Dess poäng sätter den dock inte på toppen. Jämförbara enheter finns tillgängliga från ~20 500 SEK ($2500) men då får du ge avkall på 4K-skärmen. Intresserade köpare får själva välja om skärm och andra funktioner är värda det högre priset.

Aorus X5 v7 - 10/08/2017 v6
Christian Hintze

Design
83 / 98 → 85%
Tangentbord
85%
Mus
81%
Anslutningar
66 / 81 → 82%
Vikt
59 / 66 → 88%
Batteri
66%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
93%
Programprestanda
97%
Temperatur
73 / 95 → 77%
Ljudnivå
58 / 90 → 64%
Audio
75%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Medel
75%
85%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Aorus X5 v7 (i7-7820HK, GTX 1070, UHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Christian Hintze, 2017-10-25 (Update: 2017-10-25)