OneXPlayer 2 recension - Spelhanddator med AMD Zen3+ och löstagbara kontroller

Name: One Netbook XPlayer 2
Brand: One Netbook

Nästan som en Nintendo Switch med Windows. OneXPlayer 2 tar Nintendo Switch som referensmodell och erbjuder en spelhandhållare med avtagbara kontroller. Tack vare AMD:s Zen3+ finns det tillräckligt med prestanda, men en brist på mjukvarujusteringar gör Windows svårt att använda.

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (översatt av DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/07/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming AMD Touchscreen Windows Gadget

Spelhanddatorer håller sakta på att ta sig ur sin nischtillvaro och senast sedan framgången med Steam Deck förra året blir utbudet allt större. Tillverkaren One-Netbook erbjuder också flera handdatorer, inklusive OneXPlayer 2, som vi testar idag. I motsats till enheter som Steam Deck eller även den nyligen testade ROG Allyser OneXPlayer 2 mer ut som Nintendo Switch eftersom de två kontrollerna på sidan kan tas bort.

Hårdvaran är den välkända AMD Ryzen 7 6800U tillsammans med den snabba Radeon 680M iGPU, som driver en 8,4-tums IPS-skärm med en upplösning på 2 560 x 1 600 pixlar. Det finns flera alternativ för RAM och SSD upp till 32 GB/2 TB. Vårt recensionsexemplar är utrustat med 16 GB respektive en 1 TB SSD. Priset för enheten är för närvarande cirka 1 100 euro.

Test device courtesy of Geekbuying

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

One Netbook XPlayer 2

Processor

AMD Ryzen 7 6800U 8 x 2.7 - 4.7 GHz, 28 W PL2 / Short Burst, 28 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+)

Grafikkort

AMD Radeon 680M

Minne

16 GB

, LPDDR5-6400, onboard

Skärm

8.40 tum 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixlar 359 PPI, capacitive, FLQ8423, IPS, glansig: ja, 60 Hz

Moderkort

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Ljudkort

AMD Raven/Renoir/VanGogh/Cezanne - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Anslutningar

2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm Audio, Kortläsare: microSD

Nätverk

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 23 x 310 x 127

Batteri

65.5 Wh Litiumjon

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereo, 65W PSU, 12 Månader Garanti

Vikt

864 g, Strömförsörjning: 222 g

Pris

1100 Kr

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
84 %	07/2023	One Netbook XPlayer 2 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M	864 g	23 mm	8.40"	2560x1600
87.5 %	05/2023	Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	611 g	21.22 mm	7.00"	1920x1080
		Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD ,	669 g	49 mm	7.00"	1280x800
80.3 %	03/2023	GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M	607 g	28 mm	6.00"	1920x1080
84.5 %	07/2022	GPD Win Max 2 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1 kg	23 mm	10.10"	2560x1600
86.3 %	11/2021	GPD Pocket 3 i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	730 g	20 mm	8.00"	1920x1200

Väskor och utrustning

OneXPlayer 2 finns tillgänglig i antingen vitt eller svart, med orange ljuselement i båda fallen (men de kan inaktiveras). Höljet är tillverkat av plast och utförandet är okej, men de två anslutningarna för sidokontrollerna orsakar minimalt spel i konstruktionen. Själva anslutningsmekanismen fungerar dock bra och kontrollerna snäpps också in snyggt. Den centrala delen är i slutändan en liten surfplatta med ett integrerat kickstand, där alla komponenter är installerade. Lite irriterande är det faktum att de två styrenheterna inte har något batteri och därför bara fungerar med en extra adapter när de är urkopplade, vilket måste köpas separat. Alternativt kan du naturligtvis ansluta en vanlig controller via USB eller Bluetooth.

OneXPlayer 2 erbjuder ett brett utbud av portar inklusive 2x USB-C (1x USB 4.0), en microSD-läsare och till och med en vanlig USB-A-port. En vanlig M.2-2280 SSD är också installerad, men hela enheten måste tas bort för åtkomst. Tack vare USB 4.0 kan även ett externt grafikkort anslutas till enheten hemma. MicroSD-kortläsaren är till och med riktigt snabb med maximalt 246 MB/s och kan därför också användas som en minnesutvidgning. Intels AX210-kort fungerar som WLAN-modul, så moderna Wi-Fi 6-anslutningar stöds också. Vi hade inga anslutningsproblem i vårt test och överföringshastigheterna är också bra. Handdatorn erbjuder inte en webbkamera.

Storleksjämförelse

Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD One Netbook XPlayer 2 Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme GPD Win Max 2 GPD Win 4 GPD Pocket 3 DIN A4 ❌

Upptill: microSD-kortläsare, USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 GBit/s), USB-C 4.0 (40 GBit/s, Power Delivery, DisplayPort-ALT-läge), 3,5 mm ljud

Botten: USB-C 3.2 Gen.1 (5 GBit/s, Power Delivery, DisplayPort ALT-läge)

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	193.9 MB/s +47%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	132.4 MB/s 0%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	132 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (17.6 - 205, n=67, last 2 years)	93 MB/s -30%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	63.3 MB/s -52%
Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	42 MB/s -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	265.8 MB/s +7%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	247.7 MB/s
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	238.6 MB/s -4%
Average of class Multimedia (16.8 - 266, n=63, last 2 years)	122.1 MB/s -51%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	92.8 MB/s -63%

Networking
One Netbook XPlayer 2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1584 (min: 802) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1597 (min: 1517) MBit/s ∼92%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1648 (min: 1587) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1735 (min: 1708) MBit/s ∼100%
GPD Win 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	669 (min: 485) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	990 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	712 (min: 410) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	951 (min: 921) MBit/s ∼65%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1339 (min: 1169) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1460 (min: 1393) MBit/s ∼100%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AX12	1058 (min: 914) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12	1144 (min: 1084) MBit/s ∼100%

One Netbook XPlayer 2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1558 (802-1625)

One Netbook XPlayer 2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1517-1621)

Drift - Windows utan optimeringar

Windows 11 Home används som operativsystem, men utan några anpassningar för touch-användning. De två joystickarna kan användas för pekarstyrning och skrollning, vilket är lite omständligt, men i princip fungerar. Till skillnad från Steam Deck eller ROG Ally finns det dock ingen central programvara som kan användas för att till exempel installera/starta spel eller justera inställningar. Här är det begränsat till ett litet kontrollcenter som heter Gamer Zone, som låter dig ändra CPU: s prestanda, vibrationen och ljusstyrkan och volymen. Den här menyn är ganska praktisk och alltid tillgänglig via en dedikerad knapp, men vi skulle ha velat se ett FPS-lås här också, till exempel. En annan nackdel är att det är en separat app och inte en överlagring, vilket är anledningen till att du inte kan använda den i spelet, utan den kastas på skrivbordet.

Själva joysticken lämnar ett anständigt intryck, och vi hade inga problem med knapparna under våra tester. Men särskilt utlösarna på ovansidan lämnar inte ett särskilt högkvalitativt intryck och kontrollerna stöder en vibrationsfunktion. Den kapacitiva pekskärmen fungerar utan problem, som förväntat. Sammantaget märker du helt enkelt att det inte fanns någon speciell programvaruoptimering och Windows är tyvärr fortfarande inte idealiskt för att främst drivas via pekskärmen.

Display - IPS-panel med WQHD-upplösning

IPS-panelen på 8,4 tum erbjuder en hög upplösning på 2 560 x 1 600 pixlar (16:10, WQHD), men bara 60 Hz. Det subjektiva bildintrycket är mycket bra och allt innehåll är skarpt. Dessutom ser ljusa ytor inte korniga ut. Men det finns också en synlig blå gjutning och färgerna ser väldigt coola ut överlag. Vår analys bekräftar detta, men tillverkaren lyckas uppnå den annonserade ljusstyrkan på 250 cd / m². Faktum är att den genomsnittliga ljusstyrkan i vårt urval är lite över 360 cd/m² och ett maximum på nästan 390 cd/m². Svartvärdet är lika anständigt och det maximala kontrastförhållandet är mer än 1300:1.

Färgnoggrannheten lämnar dock mycket att önska och även efter vår kalibrering finns det fortfarande betydande avvikelser. Gråskalan och färgåtergivningen inklusive färgtemperaturen är under kontroll, men ljusstyrkan sjunker med cirka 70 cd/m². Konkurrenterna erbjuder bättre priser överlag, även när det gäller svarstider. Vi kunde inte upptäcka PWM. Betraktningsvinkelstabiliteten är bra, men det finns problem med reflektioner utomhus på grund av den mycket reflekterande pekskärmen.


346 cd/m²	357 cd/m²	387 cd/m²
356 cd/m²	369 cd/m²	371 cd/m²
352 cd/m²	361 cd/m²	372 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

FLQ8423 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 387 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 363.4 cd/m² Minimum: 37 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 369 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1318:1 (Svärta: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.6
ΔE Greyscale 8.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
71.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
75.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.01

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	One Netbook XPlayer 2 FLQ8423, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.40	Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7.00	Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD 1280x800, 7.00	GPD Win 4 G1618-04, IPS, 1920x1080, 6.00	GPD Win Max 2 Toshiba HX_10.1_LCD, IPS, 2560x1600, 10.10	GPD Pocket 3 Digital Flat Panel, IPS, 1920x1200, 8.00
Display		-8%		-10%	-6%	-27%
Display P3 Coverage	75.4	65.6 -13%		63.1 -16%	69.8 -7%	51.1 -32%
sRGB Coverage	97	92.1 -5%		92 -5%	91 -6%	74.7 -23%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	71.1	67.9 -5%		64.6 -9%	66.6 -6%	52.8 -26%
Response Times		73%	27%	18%	30%	-19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	36.8 ?(16.9, 19.9)	10.5 ?(5, 5.5) 71%	30.1 ?(13.6, 16.5) 18%	26.8 ?(12.5, 14.3) 27%	21.2 ?(9.5, 11.7) 42%	37.2 ?(17.6, 19.6) -1%
Response Time Black / White *	22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4)	6 ?(2.7, 3.3) 74%	14.5 ?(4.8, 9.7) 36%	20.9 ?(11.4, 9.5) 8%	18.7 ?(9.1, 9.6) 18%	31.2 ?(17.2, 14) -37%
PWM Frequency			1080 ?(70, 374)
Screen		18%	8%	-4%	7%	2%
Brightness middle	369	513 39%	517 40%	413.1 12%	396.7 8%	438.4 19%
Brightness	363	474 31%	524 44%	407 12%	381 5%	421 16%
Brightness Distribution	89	84 -6%	97 9%	81 -9%	89 0%	92 3%
Black Level *	0.28	0.38 -36%	0.47 -68%	0.39 -39%	0.36 -29%	0.4 -43%
Contrast	1318	1350 2%	1100 -17%	1059 -20%	1102 -16%	1096 -17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	7.1	3.7 48%	5.7 20%	6.97 2%	6.31 11%	5.02 29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.9	8.3 24%	10.5 4%	14.11 -29%	10.23 6%	9.59 12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.6			1.24 52%	1.44 45%	4.05 -56%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8.3	5.1 39%	5.7 31%	9.9 -19%	5.5 34%	4 52%
Gamma	2.01 ^109%	2.14 ^103%	2.18 ^101%	2.04 ^108%	2.17 ^101%	2.29 ^96%
CCT	8838 ^74%	7732 ^84%	7733 ^84%	9571 ^68%	7502 ^87%	7087 ^92%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		28% / 20%	18% / 12%	1% / -2%	10% / 8%	-15% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.4 ms rise
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16.9 ms rise
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.9 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17898 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Prestanda - AMD Zen3+

Vi använde en TDP på 28 watt som standard för följande riktmärken och mätningar, vilket är det högsta prestandavärdet. Den AMD Ryzen 7 6800U erbjuder 8 Zen3+-kärnor och prestandan för flera kärnor är också mycket bra och framför allt stabil. Single-core-prestandan är dock under genomsnittet i alla riktmärken, men detta märks knappast, åtminstone i vardaglig användning. Här är OneXPlayer fortfarande responsiv och särskilt när du också använder den på en extern skärm (helst via USB-C), då kan du använda den som en helt vanlig dator.

Grafikprestandan för Radeon 680M uppfyller våra förväntningar exakt och är också i nivå med GPD Win4, ROG Ally med den nya Ryzen Z1 Extreme är dock snabbare i både CPU- och GPU-testerna. Det finns ingen prestandaförlust i OneXPlayer 2 under långvarig belastning eller i batteriläge.

SSD-enheten på 1 TB är uppdelad i två partitioner från fabrik (409 GB + 499 GB ledigt efter den första uppstarten) och överföringshastigheterna för PCIe 3.0 x4 SSD är anständiga på cirka 3 GB/s. Dessutom förblir prestandan stabil här även under en längre belastning.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1452 (1430.41-1463.22)

Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme; Turbo: Ø2271 (2104.49-2396.5)

GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1487 (1450.64-1776.28)

GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1070 (1059.8-1080.5)

GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7: Ø655 (525.83-745.35)

GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7: Ø570 (564.07-573.67)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF

CPU Performance Rating
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	93.7 pt
Average of class Multimedia	87 pt
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	74 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	70.8 pt
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P	64.9 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	52.2 pt
GPD Pocket 3 ^-2! Intel Core i7-1195G7	44.4 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	14960 Points +64%
Average of class Multimedia (4624 - 30789, n=102, last 2 years)	14224 Points +56%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (9130 - 11741, n=7)	10653 Points +17%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	10546 (8992.1^min - 10546^max) Points +16%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	9130 Points
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P	6941 (6788.58^min - 6941.04^max) Points -24%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	3634 (3614.51^min - 3633.97^max) Points -60%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P	1796 Points +105%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	1779 Points +103%
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2110, n=100, last 2 years)	1714 Points +95%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	1534 Points +75%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (878 - 1534, n=7)	1418 Points +62%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	1389 Points +58%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	878 Points

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	5825 Points +65%
Average of class Multimedia (1783 - 11768, n=98, last 2 years)	5369 Points +52%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (3529 - 4574, n=8)	4122 Points +17%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	4107 Points +16%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	3529 Points
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P	2653 Points -25%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	1402 Points -60%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	692 Points +103%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P	690 Points +102%
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 812, n=98, last 2 years)	646 Points +89%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	602 Points +77%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (341 - 602, n=8)	553 Points +62%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	537 Points +57%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	341 Points

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	2397 (2104.49^min - 2396.5^max) Points +64%
Average of class Multimedia (785 - 4703, n=107, last 2 years)	2325 Points +59%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	1776 (1450.64^min - 1776.28^max) Points +21%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (1463 - 1979, n=7)	1766 Points +21%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	1463 (1430.41^min - 1463.22^max) Points
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P	1081 (1059.8^min - 1080.5^max) Points -26%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	745 (525.83^min - 745.35^max) Points -49%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	574 (564.07^min - 573.67^max) Points -61%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	280 Points +96%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P	256 Points +80%
Average of class Multimedia (142.6 - 308, n=100, last 2 years)	251 Points +76%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	246 Points +73%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (142.6 - 246, n=6)	225 Points +58%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	223 Points +56%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	207 Points +45%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	142.6 Points

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	821 Seconds * -137%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P	450 Seconds * -30%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	347 Seconds *
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	304 Seconds * +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (272 - 347, n=7)	303 Seconds * +13%
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 662, n=96, last 2 years)	264 Seconds * +24%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	213 Seconds * +39%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	62657 MIPS +56%
Average of class Multimedia (20166 - 119900, n=91, last 2 years)	57533 MIPS +44%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	49708 MIPS +24%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (40058 - 53934, n=6)	49128 MIPS +23%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	40058 MIPS
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P	29214 MIPS -27%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	17053 MIPS -57%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	6316 MIPS +86%
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7163, n=91, last 2 years)	5637 MIPS +66%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P	5549 MIPS +63%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	5472 MIPS +61%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	5264 MIPS +55%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (3398 - 5511, n=6)	5120 MIPS +51%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	3398 MIPS

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Multimedia (3828 - 23059, n=101, last 2 years)	11388 Points +66%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	10917 Points +59%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	7737 Points +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (6854 - 8935, n=9)	7729 Points +13%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	6854 Points
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P	6499 Points -5%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	1956 Points +111%
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2342, n=101, last 2 years)	1759 Points +90%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P	1734 Points +87%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	1549 Points +67%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (926 - 1555, n=9)	1431 Points +55%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	926 Points

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	18.4 fps +56%
Average of class Multimedia (4.99 - 30.5, n=89, last 2 years)	15.7 fps +33%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (11.8 - 14.2, n=6)	13.1 fps +11%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	12.9 fps +9%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	11.8 fps
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P	7.57 fps -36%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	4.81 fps -59%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	84.9 s *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (50.1 - 84.9, n=6)	59.2 s * +30%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	50.9 s * +40%
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 84.9, n=93, last 2 years)	47.9 s * +44%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7	47.6 s * +44%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P	43.6 s * +49%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	43 s * +49%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1463 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

114.3 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

142.6 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

Performance Rating
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	97.4 pt
Average of class Multimedia	71.5 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	69.4 pt
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	69 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	60.3 pt
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	40 pt
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	34.1 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	24067 KRay/s +121%
Average of class Multimedia (3804 - 27411, n=89, last 2 years)	12836 KRay/s +18%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (10902 - 12818, n=6)	11822 KRay/s +8%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	11279 KRay/s +3%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	10902 KRay/s
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4760 KRay/s -56%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4076 KRay/s -63%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	102584 Points +52%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (67503 - 84031, n=6)	75814 Points +12%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	72386 Points +7%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	67503 Points
Average of class Multimedia (16379 - 136048, n=89, last 2 years)	65730 Points -3%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	20576 Points -70%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	20086 Points -70%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	4420 MB/s +93%
Average of class Multimedia (1099 - 6681, n=89, last 2 years)	3057 MB/s +33%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (2296 - 2818, n=6)	2596 MB/s +13%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	2485 MB/s +8%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	2296 MB/s
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1457 MB/s -37%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1207 MB/s -47%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	106595 Points +72%
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 134321, n=89, last 2 years)	92012 Points +48%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	86451 Points +39%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (62082 - 96306, n=6)	85211 Points +37%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	69720 Points +12%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	62082 Points
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	39180 Points -37%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	14070 Points +81%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	11141 Points +44%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (7753 - 11982, n=6)	10823 Points +40%
Average of class Multimedia (3099 - 15484, n=89, last 2 years)	9073 Points +17%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	7753 Points
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5874 Points -24%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3524 Points -55%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	54962 Points +47%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (37417 - 45748, n=6)	41695 Points +11%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	39913 Points +7%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	37417 Points
Average of class Multimedia (9602 - 68591, n=89, last 2 years)	33673 Points -10%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	12994 Points -65%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	11157 Points -70%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	102968 MB/s +18%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (50547 - 115681, n=6)	95178 MB/s +9%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	87114 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (23702 - 169946, n=89, last 2 years)	76150 MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	76146 MB/s -13%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	52338 MB/s -40%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	49619 MB/s -43%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	964 MB/s +74%
Average of class Multimedia (302 - 1901, n=89, last 2 years)	871 MB/s +57%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (554 - 755, n=6)	661 MB/s +19%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	631 MB/s +14%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	554 MB/s
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	499 MB/s -10%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	261 MB/s -53%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	12875 KRay/s +117%
Average of class Multimedia (1996 - 14590, n=89, last 2 years)	6852 KRay/s +16%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (5825 - 6694, n=6)	6239 KRay/s +5%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	5926 KRay/s 0%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	5925 KRay/s
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2631 KRay/s -56%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2366 KRay/s -60%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	37540 MPixel/s +42%
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=89, last 2 years)	37012 MPixel/s +40%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	33940 MPixel/s +28%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	31863 MPixel/s +21%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	27090 MPixel/s +3%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	26427 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (24728 - 27274, n=6)	26272 MPixel/s -1%

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	6907 Points +37%
Average of class Multimedia (4635 - 8670, n=86, last 2 years)	6609 Points +31%
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	6394 Points +26%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (5057 - 6639, n=7)	6058 Points +20%
GPD Win Max 2 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	5431 Points +7%
GPD Pocket 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	5153 Points +2%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U	5057 Points

PCMark 10 / Essentials
GPD Win Max 2 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	10743 Points +27%
GPD Pocket 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	10606 Points +25%
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=86, last 2 years)	10483 Points +24%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	10296 Points +21%
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	10205 Points +20%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (8143 - 10766, n=6)	9793 Points +15%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U	8480 Points

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	10074 Points +65%
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	9235 Points +52%
Average of class Multimedia (5845 - 11186, n=86, last 2 years)	8712 Points +43%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (6089 - 9328, n=6)	8441 Points +39%
GPD Pocket 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	7390 Points +21%
GPD Win Max 2 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	7339 Points +21%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U	6089 Points

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia (4688 - 13548, n=86, last 2 years)	8701 Points +28%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	8621 Points +27%
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	7529 Points +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (6066 - 8144, n=6)	7282 Points +7%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U	6799 Points
GPD Win Max 2 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	5514 Points -19%
GPD Pocket 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	4737 Points -30%

CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	1718 Points +70%
Average of class Multimedia (1009 - 2146, n=92, last 2 years)	1699 Points +68%
GPD Win Max 2 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1657 Points +64%
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1575 Points +56%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (1009 - 1575, n=7)	1436 Points +42%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U	1009 Points

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	1662 Points +71%
GPD Win Max 2 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1657 Points +71%
Average of class Multimedia (971 - 2064, n=92, last 2 years)	1620 Points +67%
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1596 Points +64%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (971 - 1596, n=7)	1435 Points +48%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U	971 Points

CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2865, n=92, last 2 years)	1893 Points +80%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	1878 Points +78%
GPD Win Max 2 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1679 Points +59%
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1596 Points +51%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (1054 - 1686, n=7)	1486 Points +41%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U	1054 Points

CrossMark / Responsiveness
GPD Win Max 2 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1593 Points +60%
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2171, n=92, last 2 years)	1458 Points +47%
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1457 Points +47%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	1451 Points +46%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M (994 - 1473, n=7)	1302 Points +31%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U	994 Points

PCMark 10 Score		5057 poäng
Hjälp

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	92447 MB/s +85%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	61918 MB/s +24%
Average of class Multimedia (20513 - 94254, n=89, last 2 years)	61823 MB/s +24%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	57029 MB/s +14%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	51518 MB/s +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (47010 - 52159, n=6)	50018 MB/s 0%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	49923 MB/s

AIDA64 / Memory Read
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	72065 MB/s +64%
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 90142, n=89, last 2 years)	60852 MB/s +39%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	52892 MB/s +21%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	50337 MB/s +15%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	44068 MB/s 0%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	43864 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (39197 - 45084, n=6)	42761 MB/s -3%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	92869 MB/s +82%
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 95196, n=89, last 2 years)	63766 MB/s +25%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	63189 MB/s +24%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58596 MB/s +15%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	51117 MB/s 0%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	51094 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (48723 - 51117, n=6)	50328 MB/s -1%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	123.1 ns *
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	113.7 ns * +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (106.3 - 123.1, n=6)	113 ns * +8%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M	110.3 ns * +10%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	107.3 ns * +13%
Average of class Multimedia (75 - 346, n=88, last 2 years)	102.7 ns * +17%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	90.9 ns * +26%

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
One Netbook XPlayer 2 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U	2016.6 μs *
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	1421.6 μs * +30%
GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	732.6 μs * +64%
GPD Pocket 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	645 μs * +68%
GPD Win Max 2 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	510.4 μs * +75%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3360 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2898 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 586 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 490 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 73 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 187.3 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1097 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1641 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	89.7 pt
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	86.4 pt
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	86.1 pt
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	79.8 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2	79.1 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	62.7 pt
Global Average -3	55 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Multimedia (756 - 4861, n=88, last 2 years)	2876 MB/s +42%
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	2735 (2712.9^min - 2734.9^max) MB/s +35%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	2500 (1776.5^min - 2499.6^max) MB/s +24%
Global Average -3 (113.3 - 7045, n=1551)	2279 MB/s +13%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	2119 (2112.04^min - 2119.17^max) MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	2106 (2093.38^min - 2106.19^max) MB/s +4%
One Netbook XPlayer 2	2024 (2003.2^min - 2023.75^max) MB/s
seq write
Average of class Multimedia (790 - 5709, n=88, last 2 years)	2976 MB/s +10%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	2757 (2694.69^min - 2756.71^max) MB/s +2%
One Netbook XPlayer 2	2713 (2668.42^min - 2712.9^max) MB/s
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	2641 (2205.78^min - 2640.73^max) MB/s -3%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	2623 (1837.52^min - 2623.12^max) MB/s -3%
Global Average -3 (43 - 9307, n=1551)	2306 MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	1644 (1600.76^min - 1644.1^max) MB/s -39%
seq q8 t1 read
Average of class Multimedia (1023 - 7121, n=88, last 2 years)	5216 MB/s +62%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	4274 (3828.24^min - 4274.42^max) MB/s +33%
Global Average -3 (114.5 - 16089, n=1551)	3820 MB/s +19%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	3410 (3100.94^min - 3410.49^max) MB/s +6%
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	3408 (2666.74^min - 3408.08^max) MB/s +6%
One Netbook XPlayer 2	3212 (2755.45^min - 3212.49^max) MB/s
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	3051 (2850.45^min - 3051.36^max) MB/s -5%
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Multimedia (871 - 6761, n=88, last 2 years)	3947 MB/s +39%
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	3052 (2945.64^min - 3051.57^max) MB/s +8%
Global Average -3 (46.7 - 14571, n=1551)	2858 MB/s +1%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	2842 (2705.33^min - 2842.27^max) MB/s 0%
One Netbook XPlayer 2	2830 (2802.69^min - 2829.69^max) MB/s
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	2824 (2685.19^min - 2824.02^max) MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	1790 (1750.28^min - 1789.5^max) MB/s -37%
4k q1 t1 read
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	80.5 (80.36^min - 80.45^max) MB/s +18%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	77.5 (77.45^min - 77.51^max) MB/s +14%
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	76.7 (76.25^min - 76.67^max) MB/s +13%
One Netbook XPlayer 2	68 (67.5^min - 67.95^max) MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 149.1, n=88, last 2 years)	64.3 MB/s -5%
Global Average -3 (0.67 - 361, n=1551)	58.2 MB/s -14%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	33.4 (33.02^min - 33.38^max) MB/s -51%
4k q1 t1 write
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	279 (271.06^min - 278.75^max) MB/s +81%
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	276 (268.91^min - 275.74^max) MB/s +79%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	213 (211.2^min - 212.65^max) MB/s +38%
Average of class Multimedia (69.4 - 378, n=88, last 2 years)	177.5 MB/s +15%
Global Average -3 (1.23 - 429, n=1550)	164.9 MB/s +7%
One Netbook XPlayer 2	153.8 (152.6^min - 153.77^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	151.3 (148.2^min - 151.25^max) MB/s -2%
4k q32 t16 read
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1647 (1638.92^min - 1646.84^max) MB/s +1%
One Netbook XPlayer 2	1632 (1627.81^min - 1632.27^max) MB/s
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1403 (1068.66^min - 1403.24^max) MB/s -14%
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1402 (1399.84^min - 1402.3^max) MB/s -14%
Global Average -3 (1.03 - 6172, n=1550)	1391 MB/s -15%
Average of class Multimedia (387 - 4358, n=88, last 2 years)	1339 MB/s -18%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	984 (894.6^min - 983.67^max) MB/s -40%
4k q32 t16 write
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1477 (1452.75^min - 1477.08^max) MB/s +36%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1330 (899.5^min - 1330.47^max) MB/s +22%
Global Average -3 (1.5 - 5015, n=1550)	1206 MB/s +11%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1113 (1107.59^min - 1113.49^max) MB/s +2%
One Netbook XPlayer 2	1090 (1080.49^min - 1090.38^max) MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (192.1 - 4074, n=88, last 2 years)	1057 MB/s -3%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	434 (400.52^min - 433.94^max) MB/s -60%

AS SSD
Score Total
Average of class Multimedia (2010 - 9972, n=85, last 2 years)	5054 Points +17%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	4445 Points +3%
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	4364 Points +1%
One Netbook XPlayer 2	4326 Points
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	4241 Points -2%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	3522 Points -19%
Global Average -3 (19 - 13854, n=3226)	2776 Points -36%
Score Read
One Netbook XPlayer 2	1881 Points
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1859 Points -1%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1723 Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia (669 - 3501, n=85, last 2 years)	1685 Points -10%
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1679 Points -11%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	1319 Points -30%
Global Average -3 (6 - 26650, n=3227)	1087 Points -42%
Score Write
Average of class Multimedia (545 - 4813, n=85, last 2 years)	2567 Points +74%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1846 Points +25%
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1818 Points +23%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	1623 Points +10%
One Netbook XPlayer 2	1475 Points
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1437 Points -3%
Global Average -3 (4 - 7208, n=3227)	1174 Points -20%
Seq Read
Average of class Multimedia (1192 - 5730, n=85, last 2 years)	4014 MB/s +47%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	3395 MB/s +24%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	2981 MB/s +9%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	2972.75 MB/s +9%
One Netbook XPlayer 2	2729 MB/s
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	2524.26 MB/s -8%
Global Average -3 (226 - 12763, n=3443)	1852 MB/s -32%
Seq Write
One Netbook XPlayer 2	2628 MB/s
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	2598.37 MB/s -1%
Average of class Multimedia (388 - 5175, n=85, last 2 years)	2558 MB/s -3%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	2555 MB/s -3%
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	2335.06 MB/s -11%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	1370 MB/s -48%
Global Average -3 (52.2 - 11316, n=3446)	1242 MB/s -53%
4K Read
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	73.42 MB/s +7%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	72.4 MB/s +6%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	70.67 MB/s +3%
One Netbook XPlayer 2	68.4 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (30 - 98.5, n=85, last 2 years)	62.7 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	44.6 MB/s -35%
Global Average -3 (6.08 - 314, n=3436)	41.2 MB/s -40%
4K Write
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	248.73 MB/s +47%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	234.6 MB/s +39%
Average of class Multimedia (66.5 - 328, n=85, last 2 years)	188.2 MB/s +11%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	177.01 MB/s +5%
One Netbook XPlayer 2	169.1 MB/s
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	130 MB/s -23%
Global Average -3 (13.5 - 512, n=3436)	108.9 MB/s -36%
4K-64 Read
One Netbook XPlayer 2	1540 MB/s
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1490.58 MB/s -3%
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1353.28 MB/s -12%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1352 MB/s -12%
Average of class Multimedia (350 - 2989, n=85, last 2 years)	1221 MB/s -21%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	935 MB/s -39%
Global Average -3 (13.1 - 3475, n=3435)	799 MB/s -48%
4K-64 Write
Average of class Multimedia (281 - 4265, n=85, last 2 years)	2123 MB/s +104%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1356 MB/s +30%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	1356 MB/s +30%
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	1336.04 MB/s +28%
One Netbook XPlayer 2	1043 MB/s
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	1000.03 MB/s -4%
Global Average -3 (13.7 - 5909, n=3433)	879 MB/s -16%
Access Time Read
Global Average -3 (0.012 - 33, n=3367)	0.654 ms * -1089%
Average of class Multimedia (0.018 - 0.168, n=85, last 2 years)	0.05755 ms * -5%
One Netbook XPlayer 2	0.055 ms *
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	0.045 ms * +18%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	0.036 ms * +35%
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	0.029 ms * +47%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	0.027 ms * +51%
Access Time Write
Global Average -3 (0.011 - 60.7, n=3409)	0.558 ms * -475%
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	0.289 ms * -198%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	0.115 ms * -19%
One Netbook XPlayer 2	0.097 ms *
Average of class Multimedia (0.013 - 0.414, n=85, last 2 years)	0.05952 ms * +39%
GPD Pocket 3 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	0.049 ms * +49%
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	0.046 ms * +53%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

One Netbook XPlayer 2: Ø3170 (2962.02-3188.81)

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	100 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	59.4 pt
GPD Win 4 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	49 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	48.7 pt
Average AMD Radeon 680M	47.5 pt
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	36 pt
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1195G7	17.9 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=90, last 2 years)	18869 Points +105%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	12795 Points +39%
GPD Win 4 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	10261 Points +12%
Average AMD Radeon 680M (6858 - 11605, n=32)	9979 Points +8%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	9202 Points
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	6751 Points -27%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1195G7	2942 Points -68%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=91, last 2 years)	13958 Points +94%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	7865 Points +9%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	7193 Points
GPD Win 4 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	6865 Points -5%
Average AMD Radeon 680M (3791 - 7593, n=33)	6660 Points -7%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	5506 Points -23%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1195G7	3236 Points -55%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=91, last 2 years)	5293 Points +119%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	2854 Points +18%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	2419 Points
GPD Win 4 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	2303 Points -5%
Average AMD Radeon 680M (1359 - 2607, n=33)	2221 Points -8%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	1731 Points -28%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1195G7	783 Points -68%

3DMark 11 Performance		9184 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		6490 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		2673 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

Blender: v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Average of class Multimedia (110 - 683, n=6, last 2 years)	403 Seconds * -31%
Average AMD Radeon 680M (270 - 555, n=29)	349 Seconds * -13%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	308 Seconds *
GPD Win 4 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	302 Seconds * +2%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	572 Seconds *
GPD Win 4 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	550 Seconds * +4%
Average AMD Radeon 680M (389 - 572, n=29)	474 Seconds * +17%
Average of class Multimedia (190 - 1374, n=84, last 2 years)	446 Seconds * +22%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	366 Seconds * +36%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	100 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	54.3 pt
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	49.8 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	49.1 pt
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	36.1 pt
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25.6 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=100, last 2 years)	50.3 fps +118%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	27.5 (24^min, 26^P1) fps +19%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	23.1 (18^min, 22^P1) fps
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	22.8 (21^min) fps -1%
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14.6 (13^min) fps -37%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.5 (9^min) fps -55%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia (4.24 - 123, n=89, last 2 years)	55.8 fps +128%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	25.7 (3^min, 16.9^P1) fps +5%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	24.8 (3^min, 15.4^P1) fps +1%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	24.5 (2.34^min, 16.7^P1) fps
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	9.96 (4.27^min, 6.37^P1) fps -59%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	8.99 (2.43^min, 5.38^P1) fps -63%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=90, last 2 years)	50.4 fps +111%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	27.7 fps +16%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	23.9 fps 0%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	23.9 fps
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17.5 fps -27%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	11.9 fps -50%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=87, last 2 years)	89.5 fps +119%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	46.3 (8.7^min, 11.5^P1) fps +13%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	41.5 (29^min, 31.8^P1) fps +1%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	40.9 (31.9^min, 32.9^P1) fps
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	27.3 (8.7^min, 10.3^P1) fps -33%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	21.8 (5^min, 5.93^P1) fps -47%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 171.6, n=91, last 2 years)	101.4 fps +61%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	75.5 (67.6^min) fps +20%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	67.2 (58.9^min) fps +6%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	63.1 (54.8^min) fps
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	58.2 (50^min) fps -8%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	41.2 (36.5^min) fps -35%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 131.1, n=96, last 2 years)	68 fps +103%
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	33.5 fps 0%
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	33.5 fps
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	32.2 fps -4%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	29.9 fps -11%
GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	19 fps -43%

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

One Netbook XPlayer 2 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M: Ø23.1 (18-25)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra
GTA V (2015)	138.6	60.7	49.6	24.5
The Witcher 3 (2015)			36	23.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	93.7	86.7	71.7	63.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)		32.5	23.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	53.1	39	33.5
Strange Brigade (2018)	143.5	56.7	47	40.9
F1 2021 (2021)	133.1	92.3	64.4
F1 22 (2022)	77.3	65.4	52.5	13.1

Utsläpp och energi

Fläkten på OneXPlayer 2 är ofta aktiv även under mindre krävande uppgifter och körs då också med nästan 32 dB(A), vilket tydligt kan märkas. Att minska TDP-inställningen hjälper lite, men det är inte en riktigt tyst enhet i daglig användning. När det gäller spel beror det återigen på processorns konfiguration, eftersom vi uppmätte 43 dB(A) med hela 28 watt. Om du stryper processorn till 15 watt är det mycket mer behagliga 35,7 dB(A).

Batteritiden vid spel gynnas också av en minskad TDP till 15 watt, eftersom The Witcher 3 (höga inställningar, 150 cd/m²) körs i 142 minuter, medan det med 28 watt och ultradetaljer bara är 96 minuter. Här har det stora 65,5 Wh-batteriet en positiv effekt, vilket också möjliggör mycket bra drifttider i WLAN-testet (10,5 timmar @150 cd/m², 8,5 timmar @max. ljusstyrka).

Yttemperaturerna är inte ett problem alls när du spelar eftersom endast den centrala delen blir varm och kontrollerna förblir alltid behagligt svala. De två stereohögtalarna på undersidan kan bli mycket högljudda och ljudet är okej överlag, men det saknar bas och resultatet är helt enkelt inte särskilt kraftfullt.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		26.1 / 31.6 / 31.6 dB(A)
Hög belastning		35.7 / 43.3 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 26.1 dB(A)

	One Netbook XPlayer 2 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U	Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM	Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD ,	GPD Win 4 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB	GPD Win Max 2 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB	GPD Pocket 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
Noise		10%	9%	-10%	10%	9%
off / environment *	26.1	23.3 11%	24.3 7%	24 8%	22.6 13%	23.4 10%
Idle Minimum *	26.1	23.3 11%	24.3 7%	31.2 -20%	23.7 9%	24.3 7%
Idle Average *	31.6	23.3 26%	24.3 23%	31.2 1%	23.7 25%	25.6 19%
Idle Maximum *	31.6	27.3 14%	30 5%	33.5 -6%	28.5 10%	25.6 19%
Load Average *	35.7	39.2 -10%		45.5 -27%	36.5 -2%	38.3 -7%
Witcher 3 ultra *	43.3	39.2 9%	40.7 6%	48.6 -12%	39.8 8%	40.7 6%
Load Maximum *	43.3	39.2 9%	40.7 6%	49 -13%	40.5 6%	40.7 6%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


32.6 °C	42.5 °C	42.6 °C
32.7 °C	41.2 °C	41.6 °C
31.3 °C	39.5 °C	39.2 °C

Max: 42.6 °C
Medel: 38.1 °C


38.5 °C	39.6 °C	28.5 °C
31.1 °C	31.5 °C	28.1 °C
30.6 °C	31.2 °C	27.1 °C

Max: 39.6 °C
Medel: 31.8 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 44.8 °C | Rumstemperatur 20.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


24.9 °C	32 °C	32.4 °C
27.1 °C	30.7 °C	31.6 °C
24.4 °C	29.2 °C	30.4 °C

Max: 32.4 °C
Medel: 29.2 °C


33.9 °C	34.3 °C	24.6 °C
27.5 °C	27.7 °C	23.3 °C
27.1 °C	27.4 °C	22.7 °C

Max: 34.3 °C
Medel: 27.6 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 25.1 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


31 °C	42.4 °C	42.9 °C
31.8 °C	41.7 °C	42.1 °C
30.8 °C	40.4 °C	41 °C

Max: 42.9 °C
Medel: 38.2 °C


38.1 °C	39.5 °C	26.8 °C
29.8 °C	30.1 °C	26.1 °C
29.6 °C	30 °C	25.4 °C

Max: 39.5 °C
Medel: 30.6 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 42.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 20.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-12.2 °C / -22 F).

Spänningsprovning av yttemperaturer (framsida)

	One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M	GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	GPD Pocket 3 Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat		6%	22%	24%	1%
Maximum Upper Side *	42.6	44.4 -4%	35 18%	28.6 33%	40.4 5%
Maximum Bottom *	39.6	37.9 4%	26.8 32%	33 17%	39.4 1%
Idle Upper Side *	32.4	29.9 8%	28.4 12%	24.6 24%	32.6 -1%
Idle Bottom *	34.3	28.3 17%	25 27%	27.6 20%	34.4 -0%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

One Netbook XPlayer 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.58 / 0.65 Watt
Låg belastning	7.2 / 9.3 / 9.7 Watt
Hög belastning	33.1 / 50.7 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

One Netbook XPlayer 2; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø49.6 (48-51.7)

One Netbook XPlayer 2; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø49.9 (47.2-50.7)

One Netbook XPlayer 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø8.8 (7.68-9.99)

Batteritid


Witcher 3 ultra 150cd		1tim 36min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 114)		10tim 28min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 114)		8tim 34min

	One Netbook XPlayer 2 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 65.5 Wh	Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 40 Wh	GPD Win 4 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 46 Wh	GPD Win Max 2 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh	GPD Pocket 3 i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 39 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		-34%	-28%	-17%	-43%	-12%
WiFi v1.3	628	465 -26%	450 -28%	523 -17%	360 -43%	574 ?(274 - 1204, n=96, last 2 years) -9%
Witcher 3 ultra	96	57 -41%				81.8 ?(57 - 104, n=5, last 2 years) -15%

För

+ stabil prestanda

+ lång batteritid

+ många portar inkl. USB 4.0

+ snabb microSD-kortläsare

+ löstagbar styrenhet

+ löstagbar M.2-2280 SSD

Emot

- inga programvaruoptimeringar/ingen överlagring under spel

- högt pris

- styrenheter har inte egna batterier

- ingen webbkamera

- skärm med ett tydligt blåstick

Omdöme - Intressant handdator med brist på optimering

I recension: OneXPlayer 2. Testenhet tillhandahållen av Geekbuying.

OneXPlayer 2 är i själva verket en liten mini-PC med pekskärm och fästbara kontroller och skiljer sig därmed från andra handhållna enheter som Steam Deck eller Asus ROG Ally. Detta ger vissa fördelar, till exempel när det gäller handtagens temperaturer eller applikationsmöjligheterna. Till exempel kan kontrollerna tas bort som Nintendos Switch och användas separat, till exempel som en handkontroll från soffan. Situationen var dock inte helt genomtänkt här eftersom kontrollerna inte har batterier och kräver en adapter som måste köpas separat.

Enheten ser också relativt skrymmande och tjock ut, men detta möjliggör i sin tur också det stora batteriet och ett stort antal portar inklusive USB-C 4.0. Således kan OneXPlayer 2 också användas med en extern GPU, till exempel vid skrivbordet hemma. Prestandaavkastningen för AMD Ryzen 7 6800U och handdatorn behöver inte strypa prestandan under permanent belastning eller i batteriläge. Batteriets livslängd beror till stor del på de valda inställningarna och TDP när du spelar. Den medföljande kontrollprogramvaran erbjuder de viktigaste inställningarna, men vi saknar ytterligare optimeringar, en central programvara för spelbiblioteken eller helt enkelt ett överlägg med vilket du också kan ändra inställningarna medan du spelar. Vi kunde spela rimligt i cirka 1,5-2,5 timmar beroende på inställningen, vilket inte är en dålig prestanda. Handdatorn klarar också lätt mer än 10 timmar i WLAN eller videoläge med justerad ljusstyrka.

Bra prestanda, men svagheter i drift och inte en särskilt bra skärm: OneXPlayer 2 är en spännande spelhanddator med omfattande applikationsmöjligheter, men alla funktioner är inte helt genomtänkta. Dessutom är enheten mycket dyr, mer än 1 000 euro.

Förutom bristen på mjukvaruoptimeringar är skärmen med dålig kalibrering också något av en besvikelse eftersom den varken erbjuder högre frekvens eller snabba svarstider. Priset är verkligen ett stort hinder också, för medan du kan köpa den mindre ROG Ally kan du redan få en ny Zen4-processor inklusive en 120 Hz-skärm för 800 euro, du måste betala cirka 1 100 euro för vår testenhet och versioner med mer minne hamnar snabbt på 1 500 euro.

Pris och tillgänglighet

OneXPlayer2 finns för närvarande tillgänglig hos olika återförsäljare. Vår testenhet med 16 GB RAM/1 TB finns tillgänglig på Amazon US för cirka 1 480 USD.

One Netbook XPlayer 2 - 2023-07-06 07/06/2023 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Design

76 / 98 → 78%

Mus

94%

Anslutningar

50 / 80 → 63%

Vikt

77 / 20-72 → 100%

Batteri

88 / 95 → 93%

Skärm

81%

Spelprestanda

76 / 90 → 85%

Programprestanda

89 / 90 → 99%

Temperatur

87%

Ljudnivå

86 / 95 → 90%

Audio

83%

Medel

74%

84%

Multimedia - Vägt medel

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 391291 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > OneXPlayer 2 recension - Spelhanddator med AMD Zen3+ och löstagbara kontroller

Andreas Osthoff, 2023-07- 7 (Update: 2023-07- 7)