Notebookcheck

Test av den robusta telefonen Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s: En sällsynt enhet för fans av utomhustelefoner

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 08/16/2019

En hälsning från det förflutna. Efter två år av forskning och utveckling har Samsung äntligen släppt en efterföljare till sin utomhustelefon Galaxy XCover. XCover 4s kommer inte bara med ett robust hölje som är skyddat mot vatten och damm utan har också en specialfunktion som nästan ingen annan utomhustelefon har.

Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s (Galaxy XCover Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 7884B
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G71 MP2
Minne
3072 MB 
Skärm
5 tum 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixlar 294 PPI, Kapacitiv multitouch, IPS (PLS), glansig: ja
Hårddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, , 22 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 256 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Närhetssensor, Kompass, USB-C, OTG, MIracast
Nätverk
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (MHz): 850/900/1,800/1,900; UMTS (MHz): 850/900/1,900/2,100; LTE (MHz): 700/800/850/900/1,800/ 2,100/2,300/2,600, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.7 x 146.2 x 73.3
Batteri
10.78 Wh, 2800 mAh Litiumjon
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/1.7, Camera2 API: Limited
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Batteri, laddare, datakabel, snabbstartsguide, One UI, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR (Huvud): 0.905 W/Kg, SAR (Kropp): 1.307 W/Kg, LTE Cat.4 (150/50 Mbps), DRM Widevine: L1,, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
Vikt
172 g, Strömförsörjning: 37 g
Pris
259 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s

Storleksjämförelse

167 mm 78 mm 13.8 mm 248 g166 mm 83 mm 13.2 mm 268 g162.5 mm 78.3 mm 13.3 mm 280 g152.5 mm 75.4 mm 12.5 mm 196 g146 mm 74.4 mm 12.6 mm 200 g146.2 mm 73.3 mm 9.7 mm 172 g146.2 mm 73.3 mm 9.7 mm 172 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Ulefone Armor 6
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
344 (min: 219, max: 350) MBit/s ∼100% +26%
RugGear RG655
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
299 (min: 186, max: 330) MBit/s ∼87% +9%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
274 (min: 197, max: 295) MBit/s ∼80%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=464)
230 MBit/s ∼67% -16%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
63 (min: 56, max: 62) MBit/s ∼18% -77%
Cyrus CS24
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 55, max: 60) MBit/s ∼17% -78%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Mali-T720, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.2 MBit/s ∼14% -82%
CAT S31
Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 16 GB eMMC Flash
41.6 MBit/s ∼12% -85%
Poptel P60
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 128 GB eMMC Flash
40.4 (min: 10, max: 55) MBit/s ∼12% -85%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Ulefone Armor 6
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
311 (min: 292, max: 329) MBit/s ∼100% +18%
RugGear RG655
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
274 (min: 254, max: 286) MBit/s ∼88% +4%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
263 (min: 227, max: 296) MBit/s ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=464)
219 MBit/s ∼70% -17%
Poptel P60
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 128 GB eMMC Flash
67.6 (min: 17, max: 90) MBit/s ∼22% -74%
Cyrus CS24
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.2 (min: 52, max: 57) MBit/s ∼17% -79%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
50.2 (min: 35, max: 54) MBit/s ∼16% -81%
CAT S31
Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 16 GB eMMC Flash
39.3 MBit/s ∼13% -85%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Mali-T720, 7570 Quad, 16 GB eMMC Flash
37.9 MBit/s ∼12% -86%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø273 (197-295)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø263 (227-296)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
GPS Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
GPS Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
GPS Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
GPS Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
GPS Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Huvudkameran på 16 MP
Huvudkameran på 16 MP
Inbyggd 2x digital zoom
Inbyggd 2x digital zoom
Livefokus
Livefokus
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3Scene 4
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
486
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 533 cd/m² Medel: 513.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.67 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 525 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1010:1 (Svärta: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 7.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
96.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.53
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
IPS (PLS), 1280x720, 5
RugGear RG655
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Cubot King Kong 3
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Ulefone Armor 6
IPS LCD, 2246x1080, 6.2
Poptel P60
LCD IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
CAT S31
IPS, 1280x720, 4.7
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Screen
-9%
6%
32%
14%
32%
-12%
Brightness middle
525
593
13%
365
-30%
418
-20%
401
-24%
784
49%
445
-15%
Brightness
513
579
13%
379
-26%
413
-19%
387
-25%
750
46%
437
-15%
Brightness Distribution
90
88
-2%
82
-9%
91
1%
92
2%
92
2%
88
-2%
Black Level *
0.52
0.46
12%
0.14
73%
0.2
62%
0.14
73%
0.45
13%
0.67
-29%
Contrast
1010
1289
28%
2607
158%
2090
107%
2864
184%
1742
72%
664
-34%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6
8.9
-48%
8.03
-34%
4.5
25%
7.5
-25%
4.28
29%
6.5
-8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.9
19.5
-79%
16.34
-50%
6.8
38%
16.1
-48%
8.75
20%
10.6
3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.8
8.5
-9%
10.3
-32%
3.3
58%
9.6
-23%
6.1
22%
7.2
8%
Gamma
2.53 87%
2.89 76%
2.197 100%
2.24 98%
1.99 111%
2.49 88%
2.53 87%
CCT
8605 76%
7488 87%
9941 65%
7205 90%
8242 79%
7175 91%
8274 79%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9322 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.8 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.4 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3569 Points ∼76%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2965 Points ∼63% -17%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
3041 Points ∼65% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (2832 - 3569, n=3)
3224 Points ∼69% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=328)
4681 Points ∼100% +31%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4082 Points ∼86%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3300 Points ∼70% -19%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3948 Points ∼84% -3%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
3732 Points ∼79% -9%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
1135 Points ∼24% -72%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
1855 Points ∼39% -55%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (3590 - 4082, n=3)
3795 Points ∼80% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=387)
4727 Points ∼100% +16%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1216 Points ∼85%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
789 Points ∼55% -35%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
878 Points ∼61% -28%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
789 Points ∼55% -35%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
437 Points ∼31% -64%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
629 Points ∼44% -48%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1168 - 1216, n=3)
1199 Points ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=387)
1429 Points ∼100% +18%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
5309 Points ∼76%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4942 Points ∼71% -7%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4960 Points ∼71% -7%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6950 Points ∼100% +31%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
4778 Points ∼69% -10%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
2300 Points ∼33% -57%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
3446 Points ∼50% -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (5136 - 5309, n=3)
5250 Points ∼76% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=401)
5392 Points ∼78% +2%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6316 Points ∼66%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6679 Points ∼70% +6%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
6379 Points ∼67% +1%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
9513 Points ∼100% +51%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
6036 Points ∼63% -4%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
3080 Points ∼32% -51%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
4508 Points ∼47% -29%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (6316 - 6902, n=3)
6680 Points ∼70% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=568)
5857 Points ∼62% -7%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2105 Points ∼78%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (2018 - 2105, n=3)
2058 Points ∼76% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=78)
2702 Points ∼100% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
477 Points ∼17%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (477 - 498, n=3)
485 Points ∼17% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=78)
2825 Points ∼100% +492%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
576 Points ∼22%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (576 - 598, n=3)
584 Points ∼23% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=78)
2570 Points ∼100% +346%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1554 Points ∼58%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
996 Points ∼37% -36%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1895 Points ∼71% +22%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2675 Points ∼100% +72%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
1455 Points ∼54% -6%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
944 Points ∼35% -39%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1554 - 1628, n=3)
1599 Points ∼60% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=408)
2012 Points ∼75% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
498 Points ∼27%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
431 Points ∼24% -13%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
415 Points ∼23% -17%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
881 Points ∼48% +77%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
382 Points ∼21% -23%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
87 Points ∼5% -83%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (439 - 498, n=3)
459 Points ∼25% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=408)
1834 Points ∼100% +268%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
588 Points ∼35%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
493 Points ∼29% -16%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
502 Points ∼29% -15%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1037 Points ∼61% +76%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
457 Points ∼27% -22%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
109 Points ∼6% -81%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (524 - 588, n=3)
546 Points ∼32% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=409)
1703 Points ∼100% +190%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1768 Points ∼64%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
993 Points ∼36% -44%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1882 Points ∼68% +6%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2765 Points ∼100% +56%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
1476 Points ∼53% -17%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
1002 Points ∼36% -43%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1624 - 1768, n=3)
1674 Points ∼61% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5133, n=437)
1920 Points ∼69% +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
826 Points ∼34%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
698 Points ∼29% -15%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
643 Points ∼26% -22%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1441 Points ∼59% +74%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
599 Points ∼25% -27%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
162 Points ∼7% -80%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (646 - 826, n=3)
710 Points ∼29% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=437)
2444 Points ∼100% +196%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
937 Points ∼46%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
747 Points ∼36% -20%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
753 Points ∼37% -20%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1581 Points ∼77% +69%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
690 Points ∼34% -26%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
187 Points ∼9% -80%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (746 - 937, n=3)
814 Points ∼40% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=437)
2052 Points ∼100% +119%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1747 Points ∼71%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
955 Points ∼39% -45%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1768 Points ∼71% +1%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2478 Points ∼100% +42%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
1374 Points ∼55% -21%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
560 Points ∼23% -68%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
952 Points ∼38% -46%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1630 - 1747, n=3)
1686 Points ∼68% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4909, n=488)
1915 Points ∼77% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
555 Points ∼37%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
361 Points ∼24% -35%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
395 Points ∼26% -29%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
628 Points ∼41% +13%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
386 Points ∼25% -30%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
0 Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
85 Points ∼6% -85%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (443 - 555, n=3)
481 Points ∼32% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=488)
1519 Points ∼100% +174%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
654 Points ∼45%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
419 Points ∼29% -36%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
477 Points ∼33% -27%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
733 Points ∼50% +12%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
439 Points ∼30% -33%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
0 Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
107 Points ∼7% -84%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (526 - 654, n=3)
570 Points ∼39% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=489)
1461 Points ∼100% +123%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1756 Points ∼70%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
951 Points ∼38% -46%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1754 Points ∼70% 0%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2511 Points ∼100% +43%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
1365 Points ∼54% -22%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
955 Points ∼38% -46%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1646 - 1756, n=3)
1692 Points ∼67% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4900, n=529)
1778 Points ∼71% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
766 Points ∼38%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
577 Points ∼29% -25%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
616 Points ∼31% -20%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
861 Points ∼43% +12%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
587 Points ∼29% -23%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
157 Points ∼8% -80%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (582 - 766, n=3)
662 Points ∼33% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=528)
1993 Points ∼100% +160%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
876 Points ∼51%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
632 Points ∼37% -28%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
720 Points ∼42% -18%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1008 Points ∼59% +15%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
654 Points ∼38% -25%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
193 Points ∼11% -78%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (681 - 876, n=3)
765 Points ∼45% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=531)
1719 Points ∼100% +96%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
13610 Points ∼61%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
13221 Points ∼60% -3%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
12566 Points ∼57% -8%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
22137 Points ∼100% +63%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
10234 Points ∼46% -25%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
6396 Points ∼29% -53%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
11459 Points ∼52% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (11287 - 13610, n=3)
12324 Points ∼56% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=689)
14382 Points ∼65% +6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
13711 Points ∼61%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10070 Points ∼44% -27%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
11234 Points ∼50% -18%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
18998 Points ∼84% +39%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
1152 Points ∼5% -92%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
5042 Points ∼22% -63%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
3985 Points ∼18% -71%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (11335 - 13711, n=3)
12158 Points ∼54% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=687)
22643 Points ∼100% +65%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
13688 Points ∼70%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10633 Points ∼54% -22%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
11505 Points ∼59% -16%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
19616 Points ∼100% +43%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
10956 Points ∼56% -20%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
5291 Points ∼27% -61%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
4661 Points ∼24% -66%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (11324 - 13688, n=3)
12192 Points ∼62% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=687)
18264 Points ∼93% +33%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
25 fps ∼65%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
17 fps ∼44% -32%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
23 fps ∼59% -8%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
34 fps ∼88% +36%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
21 fps ∼54% -16%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
5.6 fps ∼14% -78%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
6.8 fps ∼18% -73%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (20 - 25, n=3)
21.7 fps ∼56% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=707)
38.7 fps ∼100% +55%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
41 fps ∼100%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
24 fps ∼59% -41%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
36 fps ∼88% -12%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
32 fps ∼78% -22%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
22 fps ∼54% -46%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
9.8 fps ∼24% -76%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
11 fps ∼27% -73%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (31 - 41, n=3)
34.3 fps ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=716)
28.4 fps ∼69% -31%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
13 fps ∼58%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
9.1 fps ∼41% -30%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
11 fps ∼49% -15%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
18 fps ∼80% +38%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
10 fps ∼45% -23%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
1.9 fps ∼8% -85%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
2.6 fps ∼12% -80%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (10 - 13, n=3)
11.3 fps ∼50% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=612)
22.4 fps ∼100% +72%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
27 fps ∼100%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
15 fps ∼56% -44%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
22 fps ∼81% -19%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
17 fps ∼63% -37%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
10 fps ∼37% -63%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
4.3 fps ∼16% -84%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
5.4 fps ∼20% -80%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (20 - 27, n=3)
22.3 fps ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=621)
19.7 fps ∼73% -27%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
8.1 fps ∼44%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5.9 fps ∼32% -27%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
7.2 fps ∼39% -11%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
12 fps ∼66% +48%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
6.6 fps ∼36% -19%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
1.6 fps ∼9% -80%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (6.5 - 8.1, n=3)
7.03 fps ∼38% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=477)
18.3 fps ∼100% +126%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
19 fps ∼100%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 fps ∼53% -47%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼84% -16%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
11 fps ∼58% -42%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
6.3 fps ∼33% -67%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
3.9 fps ∼21% -79%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (14 - 19, n=3)
15.7 fps ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=479)
17.1 fps ∼90% -10%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6.4 fps ∼62%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.2 fps ∼41% -34%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
3.9 fps ∼38% -39%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2.6 fps ∼25% -59%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
1.4 fps ∼14% -78%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (4.8 - 6.4, n=3)
5.33 fps ∼52% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=200)
10.3 fps ∼100% +61%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1.8 fps ∼25%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.3 fps ∼18% -28%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1.5 fps ∼21% -17%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4.3 fps ∼60% +139%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
2.2 fps ∼31% +22%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1.4 - 1.8, n=3)
1.533 fps ∼22% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=199)
7.13 fps ∼100% +296%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
10 fps ∼66%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.7 fps ∼44% -33%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
6.9 fps ∼46% -31%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6.9 fps ∼46% -31%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
3.7 fps ∼25% -63%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (7.8 - 10, n=3)
8.57 fps ∼57% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=204)
15.1 fps ∼100% +51%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
5 fps ∼30%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.6 fps ∼21% -28%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4.1 fps ∼24% -18%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.6 fps ∼45% +52%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
3.8 fps ∼22% -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (4 - 5, n=3)
4.33 fps ∼26% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=204)
16.9 fps ∼100% +238%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.3 fps ∼35%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2.8 fps ∼23% -35%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4.1 fps ∼33% -5%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7 fps ∼56% +63%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
3.8 fps ∼31% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (4.1 - 4.3, n=3)
4.2 fps ∼34% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=402)
12.4 fps ∼100% +188%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
12 fps ∼100%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.9 fps ∼41% -59%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
8.5 fps ∼71% -29%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7 fps ∼58% -42%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
3.8 fps ∼32% -68%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (8.6 - 12, n=3)
9.77 fps ∼81% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=406)
11.2 fps ∼93% -7%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
102121 Points ∼71%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
74180 Points ∼52% -27%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
91026 Points ∼63% -11%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
131861 Points ∼92% +29%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
83745 Points ∼58% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (89089 - 102121, n=3)
95558 Points ∼67% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=297)
143610 Points ∼100% +41%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
977 Points ∼87%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
733 Points ∼65% -25%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
753 Points ∼67% -23%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1128 Points ∼100% +15%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
10 Points ∼1% -99%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
661 Points ∼59% -32%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (977 - 1113, n=3)
1065 Points ∼94% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=644)
766 Points ∼68% -22%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1113 Points ∼52%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
744 Points ∼35% -33%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
952 Points ∼45% -14%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1486 Points ∼70% +34%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
866 Points ∼41% -22%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
256 Points ∼12% -77%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
253 Points ∼12% -77%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (879 - 1113, n=3)
962 Points ∼45% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=644)
2125 Points ∼100% +91%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1985 Points ∼87%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1065 Points ∼47% -46%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1252 Points ∼55% -37%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2276 Points ∼100% +15%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
1136 Points ∼50% -43%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
328 Points ∼14% -83%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
1066 Points ∼47% -46%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1985 - 2008, n=3)
1995 Points ∼88% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=644)
1563 Points ∼69% -21%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3507 Points ∼74%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2434 Points ∼51% -31%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2952 Points ∼62% -16%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4736 Points ∼100% +35%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
2465 Points ∼52% -30%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
899 Points ∼19% -74%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
1396 Points ∼29% -60%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (3164 - 3507, n=3)
3348 Points ∼71% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=644)
3048 Points ∼64% -13%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1658 Points ∼80%
RugGear RG655
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1090 Points ∼53% -34%
Cubot King Kong 3
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1276 Points ∼62% -23%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2062 Points ∼100% +24%
Poptel P60
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, Mali-G71 MP2, 6144
384 Points ∼19% -77%
CAT S31
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Adreno 304, 2048
1 Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, Mali-T720, 2048
706 Points ∼34% -57%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
  (1576 - 1658, n=3)
1614 Points ∼78% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=644)
1531 Points ∼74% -8%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=116)
36.5 Points ∼100% +63%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s (Chrome 75)
22.457 Points ∼62%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (21.5 - 23.4, n=3)
22.4 Points ∼61% 0%
Cubot King Kong 3
15.994 Points ∼44% -29%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=104)
40.2 runs/min ∼100% +81%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
22.15 runs/min ∼55%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (20.7 - 22.2, n=3)
21.5 runs/min ∼53% -3%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=175)
67.8 Points ∼100% +41%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
48 Points ∼71%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (45 - 48, n=3)
47 Points ∼69% -2%
RugGear RG655 (Chrome 75)
30 Points ∼44% -37%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Ulefone Armor 6 (Chrome 71)
8287 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (6921 - 7470, n=3)
7152 Points ∼86% +1%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s (Chrome 75)
7065 Points ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=703)
6943 Points ∼84% -2%
Cubot King Kong 3 (Chrome 73)
4896 Points ∼59% -31%
Poptel P60 (Chrome 71)
3998 Points ∼48% -43%
RugGear RG655
3312 Points ∼40% -53%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58)
3133 Points ∼38% -56%
CAT S31
2010 Points ∼24% -72%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
CAT S31
17827.9 ms * ∼100% -206%
Poptel P60 (Chrome 71)
13076.9 ms * ∼73% -124%
RugGear RG655
12363.9 ms * ∼69% -112%
Cubot King Kong 3 (Chrome 73)
11353 ms * ∼64% -95%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4 (Chrome 58)
11130 ms * ∼62% -91%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=728)
10429 ms * ∼58% -79%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s (Chrome 75)
5826.7 ms * ∼33%
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (5546 - 5917, n=3)
5763 ms * ∼32% +1%
Ulefone Armor 6 (Chrome 71)
4416.2 ms * ∼25% +24%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy XCover 4sRugGear RG655Cubot King Kong 3Ulefone Armor 6Poptel P60CAT S31Samsung Galaxy XCover 4Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-7%
-1%
39%
33%
-23%
-21%
-0%
14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
74.31
16%
60.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-6%
72.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
59.5
-7%
55.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-13%
50.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=148)
-21%
49.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=438)
-23%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
79.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
81.15
2%
75.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-5%
80.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
81.8
3%
68.97 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-13%
69.7 (8.2 - 96.5, n=148)
-12%
67.8 (8.1 - 96.5, n=438)
-15%
Random Write 4KB
10.38
11.68
13%
11.21
8%
19.87
91%
15.18
46%
14.81
43%
11.9
15%
18.2 (0.75 - 77.3, n=188)
75%
23.5 (0.14 - 259, n=764)
126%
Random Read 4KB
59.56
15.99
-73%
17.21
-71%
81.33
37%
69.7
17%
14.28
-76%
21.8
-63%
39.3 (3.59 - 117, n=188)
-34%
48.7 (1.59 - 226, n=764)
-18%
Sequential Write 256KB
85.4
121.31
42%
134.32
57%
188.45
121%
188.76
121%
62.13
-27%
73.6
-14%
94.5 (14.8 - 189, n=188)
11%
99.8 (2.99 - 590, n=764)
17%
Sequential Read 256KB
298.6
233.33
-22%
241.01
-19%
290.76
-3%
288.22
-3%
71.06
-76%
181.6
-39%
236 (25.8 - 452, n=188)
-21%
282 (12.1 - 1781, n=764)
-6%
PUBG Compare
010203040Tooltip
; Balanced: Ø29.7 (25-31)
; HD: Ø29.4 (17-31)
Asphalt 9 Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø28.4 (3-31)
; Standard / low: Ø29.6 (27-31)
Hög belastning
 30.5 °C30.2 °C29.3 °C 
 32.5 °C30.9 °C30.9 °C 
 33 °C31.2 °C30.9 °C 
Max: 33 °C
Medel: 31 °C
26.8 °C29.7 °C30 °C
27.1 °C30.3 °C29.3 °C
27.8 °C30.2 °C30.4 °C
Max: 30.4 °C
Medel: 29.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  24.7 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.734.12537.130.23128.128.54027.626.95037.536.16322.931.78023.828.510021.325.512519.128.116018.444.920017.941.825017.746.931517.953.340014.658.550015.960.963015.265.480016.269.110001471.212501570.8160014.771.1200014.471.2250014.673315014.277.4400014.777.6500014.674.5630014.975.4800015.1771000015.172.21250014.8611600015.152.5SPL27.285.9N0.963.4median 15.1median 69.1Delta1.410.24038.928.132.924.627.523.42135.733.726.127.825.932.5254321.128.41737.216.140.413.546.516.253.714.954.714.759.314.263.914.364.913.366.114.166.513.971.413.679.914.479.914.278.814.776.114.174.814.380.114.578.214.868.115.358.915.452.226.488.30.867.5median 14.5median 64.90.812.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy XCover 4sUlefone Armor 6
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Ulefone Armor 6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.08 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.65 / 1.62 / 1.66 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.03 / 4.34 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
2800 mAh
RugGear RG655
4200 mAh
Cubot King Kong 3
6000 mAh
Ulefone Armor 6
5000 mAh
Poptel P60
5000 mAh
CAT S31
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
2800 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-7%
-46%
-34%
-16%
-16%
-14%
-8%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
0.65
0.81
-25%
0.9
-38%
0.9
-38%
0.81
-25%
0.73
-12%
0.56
14%
0.67 (0.65 - 0.7, n=3)
-3%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=792)
-36%
Idle Average *
1.62
1.85
-14%
1.9
-17%
2.04
-26%
2.14
-32%
2.21
-36%
1.57
3%
1.617 (1.6 - 1.63, n=3)
-0%
1.741 (0.6 - 6.2, n=791)
-7%
Idle Maximum *
1.66
1.87
-13%
2.4
-45%
2.09
-26%
2.16
-30%
2.25
-36%
1.68
-1%
1.777 (1.66 - 2, n=3)
-7%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=792)
-22%
Load Average *
3.03
2.58
15%
5.2
-72%
3.4
-12%
3.02
-0%
2.99
1%
4.6
-52%
3.73 (2.77 - 5.4, n=3)
-23%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=786)
-34%
Load Maximum *
4.34
4.23
3%
6.8
-57%
7.31
-68%
4.01
8%
4.12
5%
5.92
-36%
4.67 (3.66 - 6, n=3)
-8%
5.94 (1.2 - 14.2, n=786)
-37%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
19tim 59min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10tim 19min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9tim 58min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 20min
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s
2800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4
2800 mAh
RugGear RG655
4200 mAh
Cubot King Kong 3
6000 mAh
Ulefone Armor 6
5000 mAh
Poptel P60
5000 mAh
CAT S31
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
10%
62%
105%
41%
96%
74%
Reader / Idle
1199
1388
16%
H.264
598
681
14%
1019
70%
WiFi v1.3
619
668
8%
945
53%
1267
105%
874
41%
1214
96%
1074
74%
Load
200
205
3%

För

+ utbytbart batteri
+ välskyddad
+ praktisk
+ uppdateringar en lång tid framöver
+ stöd för Knox
+ 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning
+ NFC

Emot

- långsam SoC
- ont om minne (RAM, ROM)
- dåligt LTE-stöd
- design från 2017
- batteritiden är för kort och skärmen har för låg ljusstyrka för en utomhusmobil
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger.de.
Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger.de.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Nya XCover är ett metaforiskt slag i ansiktet för alla fans av utomhustelefoner. Det kan låta hårt, men det är en väldigt exakt beskrivning av hur vi upplevde den. Trots att den utlovar (säkerhets)-uppdateringar under en lång tid framöver hade vi förväntat oss mer av nästan två års forskning och utveckling. Det är förvisso sant att XCover 4s har en del funktioner som är viktiga för utomhus-entusiaster, som ett utbytbart batteri, hårdvaruknappar och ett robust hölje. Men på den negativa sidan kompromissar den med alldeles för många saker vilket i slutändan gör att vi inte längre kan rekommendera den, särskilt inte med tanke på Samsungs rekommenderade pris.

Designen från 2017 är i princip helt oförändrat och infattningen är alldeles för bred för en modern smartphone, även i utomhuskategorin. Dessutom misstänker vi att problemen vi hade med vatten som tog sig in i den tidigare Galaxy XCover 4 fortfarande finns kvar med tanke på den praktiskt taget oförändrade designen. Batteritiden ligger under genomsnittet för utomhustelefoner och vi kan inte låta bli att undra hur Samsung har kunnat misslyckas med att öka batteriets kapacitet under de senaste två åren. Samma fråga får ställas för den interna lagringen. 32 GB långsam eMMC-lagring är dåligt för 2019 oavsett vad konkurrenterna har att erbjuda.

Samsung är herren på teppan i OLED-universat men väljer ändå att använda en medelmåttig och mörk IPS-panel med låg kontrast och dåliga betraktningsvinklar till XCover 4s. Systemet hade ganska dålig prestanda tack vare en jämförelsevis långsam Exynos SoC kombinerad med Samsungs egna One UI. En mer kraftfull SoC, som Samsung Exynos 7885, och mer RAM hade gjort underverk i det här fallet. Vi förstår heller inte varför Samsung inte inkluderat biometrisk identifiering på en utomhustelefon från 2019. Telefonen har dessutom en begränsad uppsättning LTE-band, vilket är konstigt då enheten trots allt är tydligt riktad mot företagskunder.

Nytt vin i gamla flaskor. Galaxy XCover 4s är inte dålig men vi hade förväntat oss mer efter två år.

Om du letar efter en utomhustelefon och vill ha ett alternativ till Samsungs XCover 4s föreslår vi en närmare titt på Ulefone Armor 6.

Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s - 10/16/2019 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Design
77%
Tangentbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Mus
84%
Anslutningar
39 / 70 → 55%
Vikt
90%
Batteri
86%
Skärm
80%
Spelprestanda
7 / 64 → 11%
Programprestanda
50 / 86 → 58%
Temperatur
94%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
62 / 90 → 69%
Camera
57%
Medel
69%
74%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test av den robusta telefonen Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s: En sällsynt enhet för fans av utomhustelefoner
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-08-16 (Update: 2019-08-16)