Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Sony Xperia 5 II – Kommer med 5G och bio-format (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.6 % | 11/2020 | Sony Xperia 5 II SD 865, Adreno 650 | 163 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.10" | 2520x1080 | |
| 85 % | 05/2020 | Sony Xperia 1 II SD 865, Adreno 650 | 181.4 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.50" | 3840x1644 | |
| 87.8 % | 03/2020 | Xiaomi Mi 10 SD 865, Adreno 650 | 208 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2340x1080 | |
| 88.4 % | 04/2020 | OnePlus 8 SD 865, Adreno 650 | 180 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.55" | 2400x1080 | |
| 87 % | 09/2020 | Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650 | 235 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Sony Xperia 5 II | |
| Sony Xperia 1 II | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS | |
| Sony Xperia 5 II | |
| Sony Xperia 1 II | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main lens flowersMain lens surroundingsWide angleLow light
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 98 %
Mitt på batteriet: 558 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.196
| Sony Xperia 5 II OLED, 2520x1080, 6.10 | Sony Xperia 1 II OLED, 3840x1644, 6.50 | Xiaomi Mi 10 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67 | OnePlus 8 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55 | Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -44% | 30% | 32% | 21% | |
| Brightness middle | 558 | 557 0% | 786 41% | 778 39% | 684 23% |
| Brightness | 562 | 561 0% | 791 41% | 783 39% | 690 23% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 94 -4% | 96 -2% | 95 -3% | 95 -3% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.01 | 2.86 5% | 1.1 63% | 0.9 70% | 1.3 57% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.86 | 7.29 -6% | 2.2 68% | 2.2 68% | 2.5 64% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 5 -257% | 1.8 -29% | 1.7 -21% | 1.9 -36% |
| Gamma | 2.196 100% | 2.171 101% | 2.26 97% | 2.25 98% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 6398 102% | 6993 93% | 6315 103% | 6481 100% | 6475 100% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 238.1 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia 5 II | |
| Sony Xperia 1 II | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (527301 - 631025, n=24) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138) | |
| Sony Xperia 5 II (Chrome 86) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 II (Chrome 85) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 145.1, n=21) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=23) | |
| Sony Xperia 5 II (Chrome 86) | |
| OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 II (Chrome 85) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS | |
| Sony Xperia 5 II (Chrome 86) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 II (Chrome 85) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=23) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23) | |
| OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23) | |
| Sony Xperia 5 II (Chrome 86) | |
| Sony Xperia 1 II (Chrome 85) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=24) | |
| Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS (Chrome 81.0.4044.138) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia 5 II | Sony Xperia 1 II | Xiaomi Mi 10 | OnePlus 8 | Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS | Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 15% | 59% | 69% | 100% | 57% | 120% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1445 | 1512 5% | 1498 4% | 1707 18% | 1713 19% | 1520 ? 5% | 1506 ? 4% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 229.5 | 396.4 73% | 680 196% | 748 226% | 766 234% | 546 ? 138% | 1115 ? 386% |
| Random Read 4KB | 187.3 | 196.4 5% | 207 11% | 215 15% | 272.7 46% | 206 ? 10% | 247 ? 32% |
| Random Write 4KB | 172.6 | 181.5 5% | 215.9 25% | 203.9 18% | 284.9 65% | 193.9 ? 12% | 271 ? 57% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 34.6 ? | 34.7 ? 0% | 81.8 ? 136% | 67.3 ? 95% | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 30.7 ? | 30.7 ? 0% | 61.6 ? 101% | 55.7 ? 81% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Sony Xperia 5 II audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0 / 0.2 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  1.3 / 2 / 2.1 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
6.8 / 11 Watt |
    
| |
| Sony Xperia 5 II 4000 mAh | Sony Xperia 1 II 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh | OnePlus 8 4300 mAh | Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS 5000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -17% | 35% | 17% | 16% | 4% | 24% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.3 | 1.7 -31% | 0.53 59% | 0.9 31% | 0.63 52% | 1.133 ? 13% | 0.897 ? 31% |
| Idle Average * | 2 | 2.3 -15% | 1.46 27% | 2.3 -15% | 2.06 -3% | 2.23 ? -12% | 1.452 ? 27% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.1 | 2.9 -38% | 1.52 28% | 2.33 -11% | 2.08 1% | 2.45 ? -17% | 1.629 ? 22% |
| Load Average * | 6.8 | 7.2 -6% | 3.83 44% | 3.5 49% | 5.55 18% | 5.26 ? 23% | 5.55 ? 18% |
| Load Maximum * | 11 | 10.6 4% | 8.89 19% | 7.68 30% | 9.71 12% | 9.68 ? 12% | 8.31 ? 24% |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia 5 II 4000 mAh | Sony Xperia 1 II 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh | OnePlus 8 4300 mAh | Asus Zenfone 7 Pro ZS671KS 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 793 | 467 -41% | 662 -17% | 1045 32% | 677 -15% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Sony Xperia 5 II är för smartphone-fotografer
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Xperia 5 II är en konsekvent vidareutveckling. Gamla styrkor kvarstår och har utökats med modern hårdvara. På så sätt har denna Android-telefon nu stöd för 5G och är betydligt snabbare när man använder WLAN. Den kraftigare hårdvaran säkrar inte bara mycket bättre prestanda vid belastning utan det känns också mycket smidigare att använda systemet. Det största steget framåt är däremot batteritiden, som är nästan dubbelt så lång som på föregångaren.
Kameramjukvaran gör det extra värt att köpa Sony Xperia 5 II.
Kameraentusiaster kan också dra nytta av Photo Pro-appen som ibland levererar betydligt bättre bilder än den ordinarie kamera-appen. Eftersom den sistnämnda också tar längre tid på sig att ta bilder kan vi med säkerhet även välja Pro-appen för snabba foton. Den som kan vänja sig vid Xperia 5 II:s formfaktor får en förstklassig telefon som dock också kostar en del.
Sony Xperia 5 II
-
08/31/2022 v7
Mike Wobker
Pricecompare
