Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Samsung Galaxy A32 5G - 5G-smartphone som inte bara går framåt (Sammanfattning)

5G tack vare eftergifter. Galaxy A32 5G har en skärm på 6.5 tum, ett stort batteri, en modern MediaTek SoC samt en fyrdubbel kamera. Men det är inte alltid den presterar bättre än sin föregångare och den har färre funktioner än en del av sina rivaler.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Galaxy A30 Serie)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 720 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G57 MP3
Minne
4 GB 
Skärm
6.50 tum 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixlar 270 PPI, Kapacitiv, 5 multitouch-punkter, TFT LCD, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 46.66 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Gyroskop, Riktningssensor, FM-radio, OTG
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), 4G (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G (band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.1 x 164.2 x 76.1
Batteri
5000 mAh Litiumjon
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (vidvinkel, f/1.8); 8 MP (ultra-vidvinkel, f/2.2); 5 MP (makro, f/2.4); 2 MP (djup, f/2.4), Camera2 API: Limited
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.2)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Mono, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare på 15 Watt, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, One UI 3.1, 24 Månader Garanti, Enkelbands-GNSS: GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, SBAS; Huvud SAR: 0.333 W/kg, Kropp SAR: 1.081 W/kg, fanless
Vikt
205 g, Strömförsörjning: 55 g
Pris
279 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
79.3 %
03/2021
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
205 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720
77.7 %
05/2020
Samsung Galaxy A31
Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2
185 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.40"2400x1080
80.1 %
01/2021
Oppo A73 5G
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
177 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
80.1 %
12/2020
Realme 7 5G
Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3
195 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
81.8 %
09/2020
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
SD 732G, Adreno 618
215 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
79.9 %
12/2020
Vivo Y70
SD 665, Adreno 610
171 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.44"2400x1080

Storleksjämförelse

165.3 mm 76.8 mm 9.4 mm 215 g164.2 mm 76.1 mm 9.1 mm 205 g162.2 mm 75.1 mm 9.1 mm 195 g162 mm 75 mm 7.9 mm 177 g161 mm 74.08 mm 7.83 mm 171 g159.3 mm 73.1 mm 8.6 mm 185 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
633 (589min - 676max) MBit/s +83%
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
347 (313min - 354max) MBit/s 0%
Realme 7 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
346 (334min - 352max) MBit/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
346 (324min - 360max) MBit/s
Oppo A73 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (323min - 361max) MBit/s -1%
Vivo Y70
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
315 (264min - 355max) MBit/s -9%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
636 (500min - 675max) MBit/s +74%
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
366 (347min - 374max) MBit/s
Realme 7 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 800U, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
355 (300min - 365max) MBit/s -3%
Vivo Y70
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
346 (324min - 361max) MBit/s -5%
Oppo A73 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
340 (313min - 353max) MBit/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
314 (288min - 350max) MBit/s -14%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (347-374)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø346 (324-360)
GNSS testrutt: Översikt
GNSS testrutt: Översikt
GNSS testrutt: Sjö
GNSS testrutt: Sjö
GNSS testrutt: Vägskäl
GNSS testrutt: Vägskäl

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angleWide angleLow lightNight mode
click to load images

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Ultra wide angleZoom (5x)Macro
click to load images
ColorChecker
6.1 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A32 5G: 4.84 ∆E min: 1.28 - max: 9.61 ∆E
ColorChecker
29 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
61.7 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
42 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
27.9 ∆E
46.9 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
74.5 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
88.8 ∆E
70.2 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
24 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A32 5G: 45.6 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 88.8 ∆E
514
cd/m²
540
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
516
cd/m²
543
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
545
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Max: 545 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 512.1 cd/m² Minimum: 5.43 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 543 cd/m²
Kontrast: 862:1 (Svärta: 0.63 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
TFT-LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A31
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Oppo A73 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Realme 7 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Vivo Y70
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.44
Screen
30%
24%
4%
31%
29%
Brightness middle
543
594
9%
527
-3%
490
-10%
623
15%
573
6%
Brightness
512
595
16%
499
-3%
455
-11%
600
17%
572
12%
Brightness Distribution
85
99
16%
87
2%
84
-1%
93
9%
97
14%
Black Level *
0.63
0.38
40%
0.69
-10%
0.54
14%
Contrast
862
1387
61%
710
-18%
1154
34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.9
2.02
59%
3.5
29%
4.01
18%
1.8
63%
2.7
45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.6
8.11
6%
7.3
15%
8.1
6%
4.7
45%
4.9
43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.3
1.8
71%
2.9
54%
2.6
59%
3.3
48%
2.9
54%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.098 105%
2.29 96%
2.23 99%
2.26 97%
2.19 100%
CCT
8120 80%
6552 99%
6502 100%
6828 95%
6712 97%
6665 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.2 ms rise
↘ 21.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
66.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 32 ms rise
↘ 34.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
472 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
351 Points -26%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
516 Points +9%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
598 Points +27%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
567 Points +20%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
314 Points -33%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (472 - 516, n=4)
497 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)
911 Points +93%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1511 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1257 Points -17%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1638 Points +8%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
1778 Points +18%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1787 Points +18%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
1421 Points -6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (1511 - 1638, n=4)
1589 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)
2988 Points +98%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1418 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
962 Points -32%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
1575 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1090 Points -23%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
Points -100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (1418 - 1637, n=2)
1528 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 9992, n=85, last 2 years)
4251 Points +200%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1525 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
998 Points -35%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1537 Points +1%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
2089 Points +37%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1291 Points -15%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
377 Points -75%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (1525 - 1584, n=3)
1549 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (434 - 10711, n=77, last 2 years)
4053 Points +166%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
7158 Points
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
10673 Points +49%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
16039 Points +124%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8773 Points +23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (7158 - 10673, n=2)
8916 Points +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)
15091 Points +111%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6145 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6291 Points +2%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
7395 Points +20%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
11047 Points +80%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8101 Points +32%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
6297 Points +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (6145 - 7395, n=2)
6770 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points +77%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3499 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1403 Points -60%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3521 Points +1%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4299 Points +23%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3784 Points +8%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
1759 Points -50%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (3499 - 3783, n=3)
3601 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)
3766 Points +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3805 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1273 Points -67%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3694 Points -3%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4609 Points +21%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3917 Points +3%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
1634 Points -57%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (3694 - 3948, n=3)
3816 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)
4186 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2730 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2183 Points -20%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3024 Points +11%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3479 Points +27%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3382 Points +24%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
2402 Points -12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2730 - 3283, n=3)
3012 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)
3082 Points +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3713 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1595 Points -57%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3377 Points -9%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4206 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3918 Points +6%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
1799 Points -52%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (3377 - 3859, n=3)
3650 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)
9351 Points +152%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3975 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1464 Points -63%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3497 Points -12%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4457 Points +12%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4086 Points +3%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
1677 Points -58%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (3497 - 4038, n=3)
3837 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)
16352 Points +311%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3018 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2318 Points -23%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3014 Points 0%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3512 Points +16%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points +13%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
2415 Points -20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (3014 - 3102, n=3)
3045 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)
4426 Points +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2575 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1144 Points -56%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2529 Points -2%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3146 Points +22%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2713 Points +5%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
1137 Points -56%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2529 - 2753, n=4)
2628 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=106, last 2 years)
2738 Points +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2525 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1006 Points -60%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2418 Points -4%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3063 Points +21%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2559 Points +1%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
987 Points -61%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2418 - 2633, n=4)
2528 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=106, last 2 years)
2733 Points +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2765 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2200 Points -20%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3011 Points +9%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3473 Points +26%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3436 Points +24%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
2423 Points -12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2765 - 3274, n=4)
3058 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=106, last 2 years)
3156 Points +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2659 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1187 Points -55%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2653 Points 0%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3262 Points +23%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2865 Points +8%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
1143 Points -57%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2653 - 2822, n=4)
2720 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=183, last 2 years)
6705 Points +152%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2597 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1039 Points -60%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2561 Points -1%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3201 Points +23%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2735 Points +5%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
996 Points -62%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2561 - 2675, n=4)
2618 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=182, last 2 years)
9675 Points +273%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2901 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2364 Points -19%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3037 Points +5%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3497 Points +21%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3438 Points +19%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
2372 Points -18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2901 - 3493, n=4)
3155 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=182, last 2 years)
4216 Points +45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2501 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1152 Points -54%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2410 Points -4%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3027 Points +21%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2506 Points 0%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
1077 Points -57%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2410 - 2628, n=4)
2519 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6439, n=100, last 2 years)
2654 Points +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2461 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1012 Points -59%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2354 Points -4%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3029 Points +23%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2427 Points -1%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
938 Points -62%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2354 - 2576, n=4)
2455 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=100, last 2 years)
2829 Points +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2651 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2227 Points -16%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2631 Points -1%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3022 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2827 Points +7%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
2238 Points -16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2631 - 2829, n=4)
2726 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 3525, n=100, last 2 years)
2672 Points +1%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1245 Points
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1233 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
835 Points -33%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
216 Points -83%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (1233 - 1344, n=4)
1269 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 9839, n=136, last 2 years)
2540 Points +104%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1215 Points
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1207 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
720 Points -41%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
205 Points -83%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (1207 - 1339, n=4)
1247 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=204, last 2 years)
6251 Points +414%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
60 fps
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
35 fps -42%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
55 fps -8%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
59 fps -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps 0%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
32 fps -47%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (55 - 60, n=4)
57.3 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)
84.6 fps +41%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
68 fps
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
39 fps -43%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
67 fps -1%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
83 fps +22%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
91 fps +34%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
37 fps -46%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (67 - 71, n=4)
68.8 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)
247 fps +263%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
54 fps
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
19 fps -65%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
37 fps -31%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
48 fps -11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps -37%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
17 fps -69%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (37 - 54, n=4)
44.5 fps -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)
72.2 fps +34%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
41 fps
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
21 fps -49%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
37 fps -10%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
51 fps +24%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
45 fps +10%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
19 fps -54%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (37 - 44, n=4)
40.8 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)
140.6 fps +243%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
51 fps
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
12 fps -76%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
24 fps -53%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
31 fps -39%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28 fps -45%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
11 fps -78%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (24 - 51, n=4)
31.3 fps -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)
60.9 fps +19%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
26 fps
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13 fps -50%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
27 fps +4%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
35 fps +35%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
33 fps +27%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
13 fps -50%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (26 - 28, n=4)
27 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)
99 fps +281%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
23 fps
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7 fps -70%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13 fps -43%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
18 fps -22%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps -26%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
6.2 fps -73%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (13 - 23, n=4)
16.3 fps -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)
43.4 fps +89%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
13 fps
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.1 fps -38%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
15 fps +15%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
20 fps +54%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
19 fps +46%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
7.2 fps -45%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (13 - 17, n=4)
15.5 fps +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)
59.9 fps +361%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
30 fps
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.1 fps -76%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
15 fps -50%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
20 fps -33%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps -40%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
7.3 fps -76%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (15 - 30, n=4)
19 fps -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=227, last 2 years)
43.9 fps +46%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8 fps -53%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
17 fps 0%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
22 fps +29%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
20 fps +18%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
8.2 fps -52%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (17 - 18, n=4)
17.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=227, last 2 years)
64 fps +276%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4.5 fps -74%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
9.2 fps -46%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
12 fps -29%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps -35%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
4.3 fps -75%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (9.2 - 17, n=4)
11.5 fps -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 119, n=227, last 2 years)
32.7 fps +92%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6.2 fps
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2.8 fps -55%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
6.1 fps -2%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
8 fps +29%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
7.5 fps +21%
Vivo Y70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 8192
2.8 fps -55%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (6.1 - 6.5, n=4)
6.23 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=227, last 2 years)
25.5 fps +311%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
252308 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
Points -100%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
253013 Points 0%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
331094 Points +31%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
279048 Points +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (252308 - 253013, n=2)
252661 Points 0%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
12331 Points
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13120 Points +6%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
13522 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
35458 Points +188%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (12331 - 13120, n=3)
12731 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)
21146 Points +71%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2735 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2123 Points -22%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3019 Points +10%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3350 Points +22%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3477 Points +27%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2735 - 3019, n=4)
2864 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +111%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
4995 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5110 Points +2%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
5692 Points +14%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
6052 Points +21%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
6542 Points +31%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (4183 - 5692, n=4)
4920 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points +94%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3281 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2461 Points -25%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
4185 Points +28%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
4877 Points +49%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4041 Points +23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (3281 - 4185, n=4)
3709 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +91%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2687 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1526 Points -43%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2687 Points 0%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
3161 Points +18%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3960 Points +47%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2687 - 3173, n=4)
2846 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +429%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1271 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31
Mediatek Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1059 Points -17%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1297 Points +2%
Realme 7 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3, 6144
1349 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1395 Points +10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (1244 - 1382, n=4)
1299 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points +18%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points +192%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
52.6 Points +45%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (34 - 64.6, n=4)
43.3 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
36.3 Points
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
34 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A31 (Chrome 87)
33.93 Points -7%
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 68)
28.09 Points -23%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
104.3 Points +55%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
90.6 Points +35%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (67.3 - 75.3, n=3)
70.9 Points +5%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
70.1 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
67.3 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31 (Chrome 87)
55.1 Points -18%
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
51.4 Points -24%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
43.9 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (35.3 - 54, n=3)
42.3 runs/min
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
37.7 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A31 (Chrome 87)
28 runs/min
Realme 7 5G (Chome 86)
26.3 runs/min
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points +161%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
72 Points +41%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (49 - 57, n=3)
52.3 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A31 (Chrome 87)
51 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
51 Points
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
49 Points -4%
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
45 Points -12%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points +136%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
17398 Points +23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (14156 - 19201, n=4)
16470 Points +16%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
14886 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
14156 Points
Samsung Galaxy A31 (Chrome 87)
10422 Points -26%
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
9999 Points -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 86)
4695 ms * -35%
Samsung Galaxy A31 (Chrome 87)
4369 ms * -26%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
4059 ms * -17%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
3467 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (2346 - 4059, n=4)
3087 ms * +11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
2673 ms * +23%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * +54%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy A32 5GSamsung Galaxy A31Oppo A73 5GRealme 7 5GXiaomi Poco X3 NFCVivo Y70Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-51%
-34%
-35%
-40%
-25%
-33%
93%
Sequential Read 256KB
858
301.5
-65%
860
0%
877
2%
506
-41%
509
-41%
696 ?(392 - 895, n=52)
-19%
Sequential Write 256KB
381.7
216.3
-43%
193
-49%
188.4
-51%
173.1
-55%
218.5
-43%
Random Read 4KB
174.6
97.5
-44%
102.2
-41%
92.6
-47%
123.4
-29%
149.5
-14%
137.2 ?(78.2 - 192, n=52)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
167.1
79.1
-53%
88.1
-47%
95.1
-43%
112.6
-33%
164.3
-2%
84.7 ?(8.77 - 208, n=52)
-49%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
75.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
43.11 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
66.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
55.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
37.03 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G; League of Legends: Wild Rift; 2.1.0.3849: Ø59.4 (37-60)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G; PUBG Mobile; 1.2.0: Ø29.8 (22-32)
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Vivo Y70
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
99.7 (385min - 386max) % +1%
Oppo A73 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.7 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.9 (1240min - 1254max) %
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
96.6 (807min - 835max) % -2%
Hög belastning
 33.2 °C32.8 °C33.4 °C 
 32.7 °C31.4 °C33.7 °C 
 29.7 °C31.4 °C32.4 °C 
Max: 33.7 °C
Medel: 32.3 °C
28.7 °C31.2 °C31.4 °C
28.7 °C29.3 °C33 °C
27.8 °C28.4 °C30.8 °C
Max: 33 °C
Medel: 29.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  25.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.944.9252942.83125.144.24031.445.15042.446.16332.448.5802647.810021.547.41251549.116021.350.920014.453.82501457.531513.559.540011.964.350012.265.563012.666.580013.471.7100012.275.7125012.378160012.779.9200013.580.925001383315012.885.1400013.782.3500013.583.6630013.881.7800014.783.31000013.680.21250014.273160001571.1SPL25.793.2N0.795median 13.5median 75.7Delta110.330.530.121.326.518.425.822.52420.328.115.828.315.728.616.728.315.133.11550.410.651.114.155.410.862.310.962.410.567.28.8691071.110.173.111.176.111.979.61180.512.180.812.57812.778.313.478.913.874.21571.11467.814.162.814.162.424.489.20.574.8median 12.5median 71.129.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A32 5GXiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.18 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.64 / 1.95 / 1.98 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 6.77 / 11.42 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A31
5000 mAh
Oppo A73 5G
4040 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
5160 mAh
Vivo Y70
4100 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
7%
26%
-9%
26%
3%
10%
Idle Minimum *
0.64
1
-56%
0.58
9%
0.93
-45%
0.83
-30%
1.005 ?(0.58 - 2, n=4)
-57%
Idle Average *
1.95
1.6
18%
1.86
5%
2.47
-27%
1.4
28%
1.878 ?(1.2 - 2.5, n=4)
4%
Idle Maximum *
1.98
1.9
4%
1.88
5%
2.51
-27%
1.68
15%
2.04 ?(1.5 - 2.8, n=4)
-3%
Load Average *
6.77
5
26%
3.1
54%
5.62
17%
2.61
61%
4.47 ?(3.1 - 6.77, n=4)
34%
Load Maximum *
11.42
6.7
41%
5.01
56%
6.93
39%
5.12
55%
7.08 ?(4.7 - 11.4, n=4)
38%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
49tim 18min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 88)
20tim 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
22tim 03min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
6tim 33min
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A31
5000 mAh
Oppo A73 5G
4040 mAh
Realme 7 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
5160 mAh
Vivo Y70
4100 mAh
Battery Runtime
-13%
15%
-17%
-17%
-34%
Reader / Idle
2958
2453
-17%
2427
-18%
H.264
1323
1255
-5%
1188
-10%
WiFi v1.3
1235
1160
-6%
1426
15%
1026
-17%
1116
-10%
819
-34%
Load
393
306
-22%
280
-29%

För

+ Riktigt lång batteritid
+ Bra monohögtalare
+ Utökningsbar lagring
+ 5G och brett utbud av frekvenser

Emot

- 720p LCD med låg kontrast
- Tjock och tung
- Lite RAM

Omdöme - I effektivitetens namn

Recension av Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. Recensionsex från cyberport.de
Recension av Samsung Galaxy A32 5G. Recensionsex från cyberport.de

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Ser vi på den som en fristående produkt är Samsung Galaxy A32 5G en bra 5G-smartphone för under 3.000 kronor som övertygar vid vardagsbruk med bra systemprestanda, lång batteritid och användbara funktioner som ljudanslutning och radiomottagare.

Det största bristen vid en direkt jämförelse med föregångaren är skärmen. Faktum att man inte längre använder en AMOLED-skärm är mindre viktigt, för ett PWM-fritt alternativ är definitivt välkommet i det här prissegmentet. Men TFT LCD-skärmen känns lite slarvigt vald, för den gör att man får kompromissa på alla områden, oavsett om det är ljusstyrka, kontrast eller pixeldensitet.

Men lägre pixeldensitet är också en anledning till att A32 5G har bättre batteritid än Galaxy A31.

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G tvingar en att acceptera några kompromisser, men den är en pålitlig kollega för vardagsbruk och har lång batteritid och hög systemprestanda.

Lagringskonfigurationen kunde varit lite mer generös i basversionen; vi hade gärna sett ytterligare två gigabyte RAM för att göra A32 5G mer framtidssäkrad.

Det finns definitivt bättre alternativ än A32 5G till fullpris, men vi förväntar oss att telefonen blir betydligt billigare i framtiden, vilket då kan göra den till ett intressant alternativ.

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G - 03/11/2021 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Design
79%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Mus
89%
Anslutningar
51 / 70 → 72%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
93%
Skärm
81%
Spelprestanda
26 / 64 → 40%
Programprestanda
62 / 86 → 72%
Temperatur
93%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
58%
Medel
74%
79%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy A32 5G - 5G-smartphone som inte bara går framåt (Sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2021-03-17 (Update: 2021-03-17)