Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Lenovo Yoga Book C930 (i5-7Y54, LTE, E-Ink) Omvandlingsbar (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader - maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Average of class Convertible (last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F | |
| Huawei Matebook E | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Average of class Convertible (last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F | |
| Huawei Matebook E | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 351 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1526:1 (Svärta: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.59 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 3.26
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
74% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
83.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
| Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F BOE 0765, , 2560x1660, 10.80 | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1826, 12.30 | Huawei Matebook E Chi Mei CMN7801, , 2160x1440, 12.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 LSN120QL01L01, , 2160x1440, 12.00 | Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE nicht auslesbar, Farbgamut: 70% lt. Hersteller, , 1920x1080, 10.10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -13% | -3% | |||
| Display P3 Coverage | 88.5 | 68.5 -23% | 84.9 -4% | ||
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.2 -1% | 99.8 0% | ||
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 83.2 | 70.1 -16% | 79.9 -4% | ||
| Response Times | -1% | 30% | 25% | 8% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43 ? | 42 ? 2% | 26 ? 40% | 28.4 ? 34% | 36 ? 16% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 28 ? -4% | 22 ? 19% | 22.8 ? 16% | 27 ? -0% |
| PWM Frequency | 221.2 ? | ||||
| Screen | 10% | -2% | -14% | -2% | |
| Brightness middle | 351 | 461 31% | 439 25% | 388.1 11% | 382 9% |
| Brightness | 338 | 444 31% | 428 27% | 344 2% | 363 7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 93 7% | 92 6% | 78 -10% | 83 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.34 -48% | 0.35 -52% | 0.39 -70% | 0.37 -61% |
| Contrast | 1526 | 1356 -11% | 1254 -18% | 995 -35% | 1032 -32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.59 | 3.43 25% | 5.17 -13% | 4.6 -0% | 3.61 21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.81 | 5.55 43% | 7.68 22% | 9.1 7% | 7.92 19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.26 | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 3.08 41% | 5.69 -9% | 6.1 -17% | 3.77 27% |
| Gamma | 2.41 91% | 3.03 73% | 2.42 91% | 2.07 106% | 2.43 91% |
| CCT | 7712 84% | 7014 93% | 7999 81% | 7104 91% | 6760 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 74 | 64 -14% | 71 -4% | 59 -20% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 99 -1% | 100 0% | 91 -9% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
4% | 8% /
2% | 6% /
-8% | 3% /
0% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei Matebook E | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F | |
| Average Intel Core i5-7Y54 (111 - 124, n=7) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei Matebook E | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F | |
| Average Intel Core i5-7Y54 (205 - 262, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Convertible (1.86 - 3.26, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-7Y54 (1.27 - 1.41, n=4) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Convertible (11 - 25, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F | |
| Average Intel Core i5-7Y54 (2.27 - 2.57, n=5) | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
| Average of class Convertible (8098 - 13618, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F | |
| Average Intel Core i5-7Y54 (5545 - 6248, n=3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
| Average of class Convertible (40308 - 71128, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F | |
| Average Intel Core i5-7Y54 (8756 - 10501, n=3) | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Convertible (4404 - 5830, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Huawei Matebook E | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-7Y54, Intel HD Graphics 615 (2232 - 3092, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Average of class Convertible (2921 - 6089, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-7Y54, Intel HD Graphics 615 (3244 - 4288, n=3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2232 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3244 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 2385 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Samsung PM971 KUS020203M | Huawei Matebook E SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -18% | -24% | 36% | -88% | 8% | |
| Read Seq | 880 | 691 -21% | 506 -42% | 1739 98% | 120.5 -86% | 844 ? -4% |
| Write Seq | 759 | 670 -12% | 461 -39% | 1259 66% | 34.39 -95% | 679 ? -11% |
| Read 512 | 721 | 261.1 -64% | 341.9 -53% | 698 -3% | 102.6 -86% | 653 ? -9% |
| Write 512 | 665 | 241 -64% | 294.7 -56% | 869 31% | 26.58 -96% | 583 ? -12% |
| Read 4k | 44.39 | 40.11 -10% | 32.46 -27% | 52.3 18% | 13.34 -70% | 48.1 ? 8% |
| Write 4k | 90.8 | 98.8 9% | 65.3 -28% | 120 32% | 11.56 -87% | 94.5 ? 4% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 270.9 | 301.8 11% | 381.8 41% | 247.9 -8% | 33.6 -88% | 410 ? 51% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 165.6 | 172 4% | 184.4 11% | 259 56% | 13.79 -92% | 230 ? 39% |
| AS SSD | -5% | -39% | 106% | -93% | 1% | |
| Seq Read | 1241 | 1226 -1% | 489.8 -61% | 2130 72% | 128.4 -90% | 1279 ? 3% |
| Seq Write | 797 | 514 -36% | 202.1 -75% | 887 11% | 28.76 -96% | 766 ? -4% |
| 4K Read | 43.38 | 38.82 -11% | 30.43 -30% | 44.11 2% | 45.5 ? 5% | |
| 4K Write | 91.6 | 88.6 -3% | 60.5 -34% | 125.8 37% | 91 ? -1% | |
| 4K-64 Read | 582 | 891 53% | 359.7 -38% | 2208 279% | 613 ? 5% | |
| 4K-64 Write | 231.7 | 144.3 -38% | 149.6 -35% | 598 158% | 273 ? 18% | |
| Access Time Read * | 0.057 | 0.074 -30% | 0.107 -88% | 0.054 5% | 0.1095 ? -92% | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.176 | 0.04 77% | 0.075 57% | 0.028 84% | 0.202 ? -15% | |
| Score Read | 749 | 1053 41% | 439 -41% | 2465 229% | 786 ? 5% | |
| Score Write | 403 | 284 -30% | 230 -43% | 812 101% | 441 ? 9% | |
| Score Total | 1526 | 1847 21% | 890 -42% | 4470 193% | 1616 ? 6% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 448.1 | 173.2 -61% | 694 55% | 490 ? 9% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 94.3 | 83.8 -11% | 320.8 240% | 129.9 ? 38% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 254.5 | 140.7 -45% | 302.8 19% | 330 ? 30% | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -12% /
-10% | -32% /
-33% | 71% /
81% | -91% /
-89% | 5% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Convertible (471 - 40768, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F | |
| Huawei Matebook E | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 | |
| Average Intel HD Graphics 615 (1032 - 1384, n=14) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Average of class Convertible (2965 - 154219, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel HD Graphics 615 (5478 - 7839, n=13) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Convertible (365 - 29684, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel HD Graphics 615 (647 - 965, n=11) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1367 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4893 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 747 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 The Witcher 3 low | |
| Average of class Convertible (35 - 354, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel HD Graphics 615 () | |
| 1366x768 The Witcher 3 medium | |
| Average of class Convertible (28 - 257, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 high | |
| Average of class Convertible (16 - 155.3, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra | |
| Average of class Convertible (8.5 - 123.3, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
| The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) | 35.1 | 18 | 7.9 | |
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 61.4 | 28.9 | 18.4 | |
| Rocket League (2017) | 26.4 |
| Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 HD Graphics 615, m3-7Y30, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M | Huawei Matebook E HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -9% | 11% | -10% | 10% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 42 | 40.5 4% | 36.3 14% | 47.2 -12% | 34 19% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 43.8 | 40.6 7% | 37.9 13% | 49.8 -14% | 40.2 8% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27.7 | 37.8 -36% | 26.2 5% | 30.8 -11% | 25.7 7% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28.7 | 32 -11% | 25.6 11% | 29.2 -2% | 27.1 6% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.4 °C / 92.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-5.3 °C / -9.5 F).
Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.35 / 0.75 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  5.3 / 6.9 / 7.4 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
19.7 / 30.5 Watt |
    
| |
| Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G, IPS, 2560x1660, 10.80 | Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE Z8550, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS , 1920x1080, 10.10 | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 m3-7Y30, HD Graphics 615, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M, IPS, 2736x1826, 12.30 | Huawei Matebook E i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027, IPS, 2160x1440, 12.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2160x1440, 12.00 | Average Intel HD Graphics 615 | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 44% | -2% | 1% | 9% | 7% | -64% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.3 | 2 62% | 3.1 42% | 3.9 26% | 5 6% | 4.12 ? 22% | 5.44 ? -3% |
| Idle Average * | 6.9 | 4.6 33% | 8.8 -28% | 8.8 -28% | 6.3 9% | 7.02 ? -2% | 8.27 ? -20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.4 | 5.7 23% | 9.8 -32% | 8.9 -20% | 7.8 -5% | 7.89 ? -7% | 10.8 ? -46% |
| Load Average * | 19.7 | 11.5 42% | 22.7 -15% | 20 -2% | 19.5 1% | 20 ? -2% | 46.7 ? -137% |
| Load Maximum * | 30.5 | 11.5 62% | 23.6 23% | 21.8 29% | 19.6 36% | 23.8 ? 22% | 65.4 ? -114% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 36 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 m3-7Y30, HD Graphics 615, 45 Wh | Huawei Matebook E i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 33.7 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 37 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE Z8550, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 32 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 53% | 7% | 0% | 49% | 46% | |
| Reader / Idle | 690 | 933 35% | 662 -4% | 1153 67% | 1112 ? 61% | |
| H.264 | 395 | 668 69% | 769 ? 95% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 380 | 682 79% | 405 7% | 441 16% | 498 31% | 564 ? 48% |
| Load | 153 | 198 29% | 134 -12% | 121.7 ? -20% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Nya Yoga Book har en E-Ink skärm som gör den väldigt unik. Den största fördelen är dess mångsidighet. Den är extremt liten och lätt och kan användas för att rita på, som en laptop, en surfplatta eller en e-läsare. Men flexibilititen resulterar också i en del kompromisser.
Som exempel är tangentbordet inte lämpat för den som skriver mycket och det är heller inte bakgrundsbelyst. Det magra portutbudet kan vara problematiskt för traditionella laptop-användare. Om det bara är en e-läsare du behöver kan du troligen hitta ännu lättare enheter.
Lenovo Book riktar sig åt personer som vill kombinera alla dess funktioner (tryckkänslighet, penna, e-läsare, osv) i en och samma enhet. Den som letar efter en normal laptop blir nog mer nöjd med en annan enhet.
Oavsett är det förvånande att se hur bra Lenovo har lyckats med att kombinera alla dessa funktioner i en såpass lätt enhet. Designen och de häftiga funktionerna (knackning) gör Book C930 riktigt iögonfallande. Eftersom vi inte har en separat kategori för E-Ink skärmar i vårt utvärderingssystem har vi lagt till två poäng till resultatet manuellt.
En del kan tänkas tycka att priset är en ytterligare nackdel. Med ett utgångspris på 10.500 kronor kostar enheten ungefär dubbelt så mycket som föregångaren gjorde. Utöver de många förbättringarna har en del funktioner också försvunnit. Möjligheten att digitalisera bilder från papper finns inte längre. Den bättre huvudkameran som fanns på den tidigare modellen saknas också och tyvärr är batteritiden betydligt kortare jämfört med föregångaren. Istället har prestandan ökat dramatiskt och dessutom är skärmen bättre. Sist men inte minst: enheten har för tillfället inga riktiga konkurrenter.
Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F
-
12/22/2018 v6(old)
Christian Hintze
Pricecompare
