Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017 (Core i7, Full-HD) (sammanfattning)

Ny företagsstandard? Den femte generationen av Lenovos populära ThinkPad X1 Carbon är återigen den lättaste företagsmaskinen från den kinesiska tillverkaren. Den utmanar konkurrenterna med ett nytt chassi, uppdaterade processorer och modernare portar.
Processor
Intel Core i7-7500U 2 x 2.7 - 3.5 GHz, Kaby Lake
Minne
16 GB 
, LPDDR3-1866, Dual-Channel, fastlött
Skärm
14.00 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 157 PPI, B140HAN03_1, IPS, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Hårddisk
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, 512 GB 
, 454 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Anslutningar
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, 1 Dockningsstation, Ljudanslutningar: 3,5 mm audio, Kortläsare: MicroSD (UHS-II), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare
Nätverk
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 15.95 x 323.5 x 217.1
Batteri
57 Wh, 4830 mAh Litiumpolymer, Batteritid (enligt tillverkaren): 15.5 tim
Camera
Webbkamera: 720p HD
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo 2x2 Watt, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 65-watts USB-C-adapter, HDMI-till-VGA-adapter, LAN (RJ45)-adapter, 36 Månader Garanti
Vikt
1.144 kg, Strömförsörjning: 356 g
Pris
1599 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

ThinkPad X270 vs. ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017 vs. ThinkPad T470s
ThinkPad X270 vs. ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017 vs. ThinkPad T470s
From top: X270 vs. X1 Carbon 2017 vs. T470s
From top: X270 vs. X1 Carbon 2017 vs. T470s
From top: X270 vs. X1 Carbon 2017 vs. T470s
From top: X270 vs. X1 Carbon 2017 vs. T470s
X270 (left) vs. X1 Carbon 2017 (right)
X1 Carbon 2017 (left) vs. T470s (right)

Size Comparison

337 mm 234.5 mm 15.8 mm 1.4 kg332.6 mm 234 mm 19 mm 1.4 kg331 mm 226.8 mm 18.8 mm 1.4 kg333 mm 229 mm 16.5 mm 1.2 kg331 mm 221 mm 17 mm 1.4 kg323.5 mm 217.1 mm 15.95 mm 1.1 kg305.5 mm 208.5 mm 20.3 mm 1.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Right side: 3.5 mm audio, fan exhaust, USB 3.0, Kensington Lock
Right side: 3.5 mm audio, fan exhaust, USB 3.0, Kensington Lock
Left side: 2x USB-C Gen.2 (Thunderbolt 3), USB 3.0, HDMI, Mini-Ethernet
Left side: 2x USB-C Gen.2 (Thunderbolt 3), USB 3.0, HDMI, Mini-Ethernet
Rear: Combined slot for microSIM and microSD
Rear: Combined slot for microSIM and microSD
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
 
120.5 MB/s +97%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
 
79.3 MB/s +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
 
76.6 MB/s +25%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
 
72.6 MB/s +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
 
61.2 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
 
252.6 MB/s +205%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
 
90.5 MB/s +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
 
88.7 MB/s +7%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
 
83.3 MB/s 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
 
82.9 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac (Klaus I211)
949 MBit/s +64%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
580 MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
512 MBit/s -12%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
509 MBit/s -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
297 MBit/s -49%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Broadcom BCM15700A2 802.11ac (Klaus I211)
948 MBit/s +47%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
657 MBit/s +2%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
655 MBit/s +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
644 MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
639 MBit/s -1%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

291
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
264
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
270
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
B140HAN03_1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 311 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 287.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.4 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 308 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1296:1 (Svärta: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
85.77% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55.96% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.02
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
B140HAN03_1, , 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
VVX14T058J00, , 2560x1440
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
B140QAN01.5, , 2560x1440
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
AUO1136, , 2560x1440
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
LG LP140WF3, , 1920x1080
Display
-3%
10%
12%
-30%
12%
2%
Display P3 Coverage
61.4
58.9
-4%
66.7
9%
69
12%
41.6
-32%
67.9
11%
66.1
8%
sRGB Coverage
85.9
83.1
-3%
94.7
10%
95.1
11%
61.9
-28%
96.8
13%
84.8
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
62.4
60.3
-3%
68.4
10%
69.6
12%
43.06
-31%
70
12%
62
-1%
Response Times
0%
9%
-2%
-4%
2%
20%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41.6 ?(20.4, 21.2)
47.2 ?(18.8, 28.4)
-13%
44 ?(17, 27)
-6%
46.4 ?(20.4, 26)
-12%
41.6 ?(20.4, 21.2)
-0%
46.4 ?(16.4, 30)
-12%
36 ?(16.4, 19.6)
13%
Response Time Black / White *
31.6 ?(18.8, 12.8)
27.6 ?(4.4, 23.2)
13%
24 ?(5.2, 18.8)
24%
28.8 ?(16.4, 12.4)
9%
34 ?(9.6, 24.4)
-8%
26.4 ?(6.8, 19.6)
16%
23.2 ?(12.4, 10.8)
27%
PWM Frequency
220 ?(90)
Screen
7%
8%
-5%
-16%
3%
0%
Brightness middle
311
321.7
3%
272
-13%
327
5%
306
-2%
327
5%
291
-6%
Brightness
288
301
5%
268
-7%
311
8%
287
0%
316
10%
296
3%
Brightness Distribution
85
89
5%
95
12%
88
4%
88
4%
87
2%
84
-1%
Black Level *
0.24
0.294
-23%
0.32
-33%
0.25
-4%
0.3
-25%
0.35
-46%
0.32
-33%
Contrast
1296
1094
-16%
850
-34%
1308
1%
1020
-21%
934
-28%
909
-30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.5
3.96
28%
2.61
53%
6.1
-11%
6.2
-13%
4.39
20%
4.3
22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9
6.69
26%
6.43
29%
12.2
-36%
13.6
-51%
7.27
19%
7.5
17%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.2
3.15
49%
3.31
47%
8.8
-42%
5.8
6%
4.69
24%
4.3
31%
Gamma
2.02 109%
2.34 94%
2.35 94%
2.18 101%
2.04 108%
2.15 102%
2.31 95%
CCT
5950 109%
7082 92%
6360 102%
6172 105%
6277 104%
7101 92%
6529 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55.96
53.8
-4%
63
13%
61.56
10%
39.62
-29%
62.52
12%
55.46
-1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
85.77
82.7
-4%
95
11%
94.88
11%
61.44
-28%
96.71
13%
84.77
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
1% / 4%
9% / 8%
2% / -1%
-17% / -17%
6% / 5%
7% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 12.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Intel Core i7-7600U
162 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel Core i7-7500U
143 Points
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
Intel Core i5-7200U
130 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
Intel Core i7-6500U
128 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
Intel Core i5-7200U
126 Points -12%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
Intel Core i5-6300U
124 Points -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Intel Core i7-7600U
368 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel Core i7-7500U
360 Points
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
Intel Core i5-7200U
326 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
Intel Core i7-6500U
310 Points -14%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
Intel Core i5-6300U
303 Points -16%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
143 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
360 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
48.6 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Hjälp
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4025 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
3968 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3507 Points -13%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
3506 Points -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
3385 Points -16%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
3305 Points -18%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4978 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
4856 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4667 Points -6%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
4653 Points -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
4342 Points -13%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4241 Points -15%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4025 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4874 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4978 poäng
Hjälp
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
2%
-59%
-0%
-54%
-18%
Read Seq
1827
1760
-4%
439.3
-76%
1649
-10%
504
-72%
1155
-37%
Write Seq
1383
1666
20%
308.1
-78%
1265
-9%
497.8
-64%
1076
-22%
Read 512
814
832
2%
299.5
-63%
1252
54%
396.7
-51%
811
0%
Write 512
1098
1064
-3%
304.2
-72%
1244
13%
283.4
-74%
862
-21%
Read 4k
61
53.2
-13%
34.05
-44%
53.3
-13%
35.73
-41%
55.5
-9%
Write 4k
172.2
167.4
-3%
86.5
-50%
159.9
-7%
87.8
-49%
134.6
-22%
Read 4k QD32
601
630
5%
339.6
-43%
559
-7%
399.1
-34%
496.2
-17%
Write 4k QD32
495.6
533
8%
279.2
-44%
376.7
-24%
249.7
-50%
425.4
-14%
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Sequential Read: 1827 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1383 MB/s
512K Read: 814 MB/s
512K Write: 1098 MB/s
4K Read: 61 MB/s
4K Write: 172.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 601 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 495.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
2556 Points +56%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
1777 Points +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1641 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1432 Points -13%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1409 Points -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1386 Points -16%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U
1377 Points -16%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
9610 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
9501 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
8971 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
7516 Points -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
6824 Points -24%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
6803 Points -24%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U
6708 Points -25%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
1752 Points +60%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7600U
1176 Points +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1093 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
959 Points -12%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U
900 Points -18%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
818 Points -25%
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
799 Points -27%
3DMark 11 Performance
1815 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
69541 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6738 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1001 poäng
Hjälp
låg med. hög ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 93.5 45.2 27.6 12.8
BioShock Infinite (2013) 59.2 31.4 26.6 8.6
Battlefield 4 (2013) 43.5 30.1 20.1 6.4
The Witcher 3 (2015) 15.2
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 20.2 11.8

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
29.3 / 29.3 / 32.2 dB(A)
Hög belastning
34.3 / 39.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 29.3 dB(A)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
6500U, HD Graphics 520
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
6300U, HD Graphics 520
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620
Noise
-1%
2%
4%
8%
7%
off / environment *
29.3
28.9
1%
29.1
1%
29.1
1%
28.2
4%
28
4%
Idle Minimum *
29.3
28.9
1%
29.1
1%
29.1
1%
28.2
4%
28
4%
Idle Average *
29.3
28.9
1%
29.1
1%
29.1
1%
28.2
4%
28
4%
Idle Maximum *
32.2
30.1
7%
29.1
10%
29.1
10%
28.2
12%
29.4
9%
Load Average *
34.3
39.2
-14%
35.6
-4%
32.6
5%
31.2
9%
31.4
8%
Load Maximum *
39.3
39.2
-0%
38.1
3%
37.8
4%
33
16%
34.6
12%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 38.2 °C48 °C45 °C 
 34.6 °C44.1 °C43.3 °C 
 25.4 °C25.3 °C31.6 °C 
Max: 48 °C
Medel: 37.3 °C
47.2 °C45.2 °C39.9 °C
43.4 °C42.1 °C38.1 °C
30.7 °C28.7 °C27 °C
Max: 47.2 °C
Medel: 38 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  38.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.2 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-3.9 °C / -7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.833.12530.2333129.633.94028.932.25027.230.86325.533.68026.235.710024.23512523.340.516021.944.120020.649.625020.355.131519.558.940018.75750017.360.163016.86680016.268.710001666.7125015.764.1160015.564.7200015.564.8250015.467.3315015.765.8400015.968.1500016.169.4630016.667.5800016.763.71000016.757.21250016.660.91600016.557.6SPL28.578.2N1.143.3median 16.6median 63.7Delta1.3631.329.631.431.5323029.529.329.329.329.929.427.528.529.1293029.429.532.133.132.133.731.933.331.833.128.224.526.338.124.629.747.523.137.255.523.545.759.823506522.555.565.520.457.362.520.152.660.919.549.6671957.96818.558.964.118.25464.51854.96518.155.665.91856.365.618.655.466.918.356.165.317.954.867.718.257.762.618.455.159.817.550.1median 64.1median 19median 54.87.52.76.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.28 / 0.43 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 3.84 / 6.3 / 8.6 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 41.9 / 48.7 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 2560x1440
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 2560x1440
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
6300U, HD Graphics 520, 2560x1440
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 1920x1080
Power Consumption
-13%
7%
-22%
5%
20%
Idle Minimum *
3.84
4.64
-21%
3.8
1%
6.3
-64%
4.11
-7%
3.21
16%
Idle Average *
6.3
8.93
-42%
7.1
-13%
9.4
-49%
7.87
-25%
6.15
2%
Idle Maximum *
8.6
9.12
-6%
7.7
10%
10.1
-17%
8.74
-2%
6.82
21%
Load Average *
41.9
42.2
-1%
30.2
28%
33.3
21%
30.2
28%
28.5
32%
Load Maximum *
48.7
47.3
3%
44.7
8%
49.5
-2%
32.4
33%
34.5
29%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
20tim 52min
WiFi Websurfing
8tim 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11tim 51min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 50min
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 52 Wh, 2560x1440
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00
i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh, 2560x1440
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh, 1920x1080
Fujitsu LifeBook U747
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh, 1920x1080
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3
6300U, HD Graphics 520, 45.6 Wh, 2560x1440
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS
6300U, HD Graphics 520, 52 Wh, 1920x1080
Battery Runtime
-12%
-22%
-8%
-13%
-24%
-3%
H.264
711
510
-28%
454
-36%
623
-12%
490
-31%
339
-52%
WiFi v1.3
496
429
-14%
417
-16%
438
-12%
430
-13%
309
-38%
411
-17%
Load
110
115
5%
93
-15%
110
0%
117
6%
131
19%
123
12%

För

+ mycket lättviktigt och kompakt chassi
+ nästan perfekt tillverkningskvalitet
+ utmärkta inmatningsenheter
+ bra IPS-skärm
+ hög systemprestanda
+ lång batteritid
+ moderna portar
+ 3 års garanti
+ adaptrar ingår

Emot

- höga temperaturer under belastning
- reducerad CPU-prestanda under kontinuerlig belastning
- fläkten startar snabbt och är klart hörbar
- inte förberedd för mobilt bredband
- bara microSD-kortläsare (svår att komma åt)
- begränsade underhållsmöjligheter
- LAN endast med adapter (ingår)

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 - 03/24/2017 v6(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Design
92 / 98 → 94%
Tangentbord
95%
Mus
91%
Anslutningar
68 / 80 → 85%
Vikt
73 / 20-67 → 100%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
87%
Spelprestanda
57 / 68 → 84%
Programprestanda
90 / 92 → 97%
Temperatur
90%
Ljudnivå
88%
Audio
77%
Camera
53 / 85 → 62%
Medel
81%
90%
Office - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017 (Core i7, Full-HD) (sammanfattning)
Andreas Osthoff, 2017-04-18 (Update: 2017-04-18)