Notebookcheck

Test: Huawei Y7 (2017) (Sammanfattning)

Florian Wimmer (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 09/30/2017

Övertygande. Huawei Y7 siktar på att övertyga köpare med ett metallhölje, en kraftfull processor och ett stort batteri. Även om dom fördelarna är bra så är konkurrensen stark i 2 000 SEK (200€) sortimentet. Du kan läsa i vårt test hur Huawei Y7 står sig.

Huawei Y7 (Y Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Minne
2048 MB 
Skärm
5.5 tum 16:9, 1280x720 pixlar 267 PPI, kapacitiv pekskärm, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: accelerationssensor, närhetssensor, kompass
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.4 x 153.6 x 76.4
Batteri
15.2 Wh, 4000 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/​2.2, phase-comparison AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: monohögtalare på undersidan, Tangentbord: virtuellt tangentbord, USB laddare, USB kabel, Telephone Manager, HiCare, Hälsa, 24 Månader Garanti, LTE Cat.4 (150 MBit/s nerladdning, 50 MBit/s uppladdning); SAR värden: 0,79 W/kg (huvud), fanless
Vikt
165 g, Strömförsörjning: 64 g
Pris
199 Kr

 

Huawei Y7
Huawei Y7
Huawei Y7
Huawei Y7
Huawei Y7
Huawei Y7

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a loyal reader of notebookcheck? Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Especially wanted: 
English-Swedish-Translator - 
Details here
News Editor - Details here

Review Editor - 
Details here

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
251 MBit/s ∼100% +379%
Sony Xperia L1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
92.2 MBit/s ∼37% +76%
Huawei Y7
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.4 MBit/s ∼21%
LG X power2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.7 MBit/s ∼18% -13%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.6 MBit/s ∼17% -17%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
42.1 MBit/s ∼17% -20%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼100% +453%
Sony Xperia L1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
88.6 MBit/s ∼32% +75%
LG X power2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.2 MBit/s ∼18% +1%
Huawei Y7
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.6 MBit/s ∼18%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s ∼17% -4%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.8 MBit/s ∼17% -8%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Huawei Y7 – overview
GPS Huawei Y7 – overview
GPS Huawei Y7 – crossroads
GPS Huawei Y7 – crossroads
GPS Huawei Y7 – bridge
GPS Huawei Y7 – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
451
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 476 cd/m² Medel: 455.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.1 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 467 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1197:1 (Svärta: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.35
Huawei Y7
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
LG X power2
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Sony Xperia L1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Huawei Y6 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Screen
-8%
-5%
25%
-16%
40%
Brightness
456
425
-7%
237
-48%
463
2%
478
5%
432
-5%
Brightness Distribution
92
93
1%
92
0%
86
-7%
94
2%
90
-2%
Black Level *
0.39
0.37
5%
0.13
67%
0.58
-49%
0.13
67%
Contrast
1197
1149
-4%
1823
52%
826
-31%
3369
181%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.3
4.7
-9%
5.5
-28%
2
53%
4.5
-5%
4.8
-12%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.5
4.6
-31%
6.1
-74%
1.7
51%
4.1
-17%
3.2
9%
Gamma
2.35 102%
2.17 111%
2.07 116%
2.1 114%
2.03 118%
2.23 108%
CCT
7273 89%
7445 87%
7943 82%
6394 102%
7139 91%
7090 92%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2315 Hz14 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2315 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 14 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2315 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 56 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7062 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.6 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
59.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 30 ms rise
↘ 29.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.7 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
43303 Points ∼19%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
30619 Points ∼13% -29%
LG X power2
38547 Points ∼17% -11%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
47339 Points ∼21% +9%
Sony Xperia L1
37495 Points ∼16% -13%
Huawei Y6 2017
40981 Points ∼18% -5%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
3928 Points ∼58%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
2768 Points ∼41% -30%
LG X power2
3191 Points ∼47% -19%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3722 Points ∼55% -5%
Sony Xperia L1
3237 Points ∼47% -18%
Huawei Y6 2017
3487 Points ∼51% -11%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
5365 Points ∼65%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3624 Points ∼44% -32%
LG X power2
4157 Points ∼50% -23%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
4920 Points ∼59% -8%
Sony Xperia L1
4285 Points ∼52% -20%
Huawei Y6 2017
4607 Points ∼56% -14%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
606 Points ∼39%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
620 Points ∼40% +2%
LG X power2
601 Points ∼39% -1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Sony Xperia L1
743 Points ∼48% +23%
Huawei Y6 2017
734 Points ∼48% +21%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
768 Points ∼9%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
208 Points ∼2% -73%
LG X power2
489 Points ∼6% -36%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
533 Points ∼6% -31%
Sony Xperia L1
386 Points ∼4% -50%
Huawei Y6 2017
386 Points ∼4% -50%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
686 Points ∼16%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
591 Points ∼13% -14%
LG X power2
693 Points ∼16% +1%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1265 Points ∼29% +84%
Sony Xperia L1
798 Points ∼18% +16%
Huawei Y6 2017
1288 Points ∼29% +88%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
1790 Points ∼27%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1086 Points ∼16% -39%
LG X power2
1758 Points ∼27% -2%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2368 Points ∼36% +32%
Sony Xperia L1
1338 Points ∼20% -25%
Huawei Y6 2017
1354 Points ∼21% -24%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
869 Points ∼23%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
536 Points ∼14% -38%
LG X power2
773 Points ∼20% -11%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
353 Points ∼9% -59%
Sony Xperia L1
744 Points ∼20% -14%
Huawei Y6 2017
839 Points ∼22% -3%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
2235 Points ∼26%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
952 Points ∼11% -57%
LG X power2
1448 Points ∼17% -35%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2371 Points ∼28% +6%
Sony Xperia L1
1241 Points ∼15% -44%
Huawei Y6 2017
1238 Points ∼15% -45%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
2866 Points ∼11%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1562 Points ∼6% -45%
LG X power2
2297 Points ∼9% -20%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3777 Points ∼15% +32%
Sony Xperia L1
1875 Points ∼7% -35%
Huawei Y6 2017
1903 Points ∼8% -34%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
645 Points ∼11%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
556 Points ∼9% -14%
LG X power2
593 Points ∼10% -8%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
736 Points ∼12% +14%
Sony Xperia L1
674 Points ∼11% +4%
Huawei Y6 2017
680 Points ∼11% +5%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
1340 Points ∼44%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
783 Points ∼26% -42%
LG X power2
1074 Points ∼35% -20%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1522 Points ∼50% +14%
Sony Xperia L1
968 Points ∼32% -28%
Huawei Y6 2017
971 Points ∼32% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
281 Points ∼5%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
79 Points ∼1% -72%
LG X power2
254 Points ∼5% -10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
199 Points ∼4% -29%
Sony Xperia L1
149 Points ∼3% -47%
Huawei Y6 2017
143 Points ∼3% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
341 Points ∼9%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
99 Points ∼3% -71%
LG X power2
306 Points ∼8% -10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
247 Points ∼6% -28%
Sony Xperia L1
184 Points ∼5% -46%
Huawei Y6 2017
176 Points ∼5% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
1360 Points ∼45%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
753 Points ∼25% -45%
LG X power2
1053 Points ∼35% -23%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1535 Points ∼51% +13%
Sony Xperia L1
939 Points ∼31% -31%
Huawei Y6 2017
967 Points ∼32% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
533 Points ∼7%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
133 Points ∼2% -75%
LG X power2
379 Points ∼5% -29%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
278 Points ∼4% -48%
Sony Xperia L1
238 Points ∼3% -55%
Huawei Y6 2017
221 Points ∼3% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
616 Points ∼12%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
163 Points ∼3% -74%
LG X power2
442 Points ∼9% -28%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
340 Points ∼7% -45%
Sony Xperia L1
285 Points ∼6% -54%
Huawei Y6 2017
267 Points ∼5% -57%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
9345 Points ∼13%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
8390 Points ∼12% -10%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
8390 Points ∼12% -10%
LG X power2
8213 Points ∼11% -12%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12955 Points ∼18% +39%
Sony Xperia L1
10767 Points ∼15% +15%
Huawei Y6 2017
11088 Points ∼15% +19%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
10152 Points ∼2%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3183 Points ∼1% -69%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3183 Points ∼1% -69%
LG X power2
8140 Points ∼2% -20%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
7456 Points ∼2% -27%
Sony Xperia L1
6015 Points ∼1% -41%
Huawei Y6 2017
6184 Points ∼1% -39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
9961 Points ∼5%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3692 Points ∼2% -63%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3692 Points ∼2% -63%
LG X power2
8156 Points ∼4% -18%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
8318 Points ∼4% -16%
Sony Xperia L1
6669 Points ∼3% -33%
Huawei Y6 2017
6858 Points ∼3% -31%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
17 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
6 fps ∼0% -65%
LG X power2
13 fps ∼1% -24%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼1% -29%
Sony Xperia L1
11 fps ∼1% -35%
Huawei Y6 2017
11 fps ∼1% -35%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
24 fps ∼5%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
11 fps ∼2% -54%
LG X power2
22 fps ∼5% -8%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼3% -50%
Sony Xperia L1
19 fps ∼4% -21%
Huawei Y6 2017
17 fps ∼4% -29%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
7.5 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
2.2 fps ∼0% -71%
LG X power2
5.3 fps ∼1% -29%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼1% -32%
Sony Xperia L1
4.1 fps ∼1% -45%
Huawei Y6 2017
3.9 fps ∼1% -48%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
16 fps ∼4%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
4.8 fps ∼1% -70%
LG X power2
11 fps ∼3% -31%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼1% -68%
Sony Xperia L1
8.8 fps ∼2% -45%
Huawei Y6 2017
8.1 fps ∼2% -49%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
2.3 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1.4 fps ∼0% -39%
LG X power2
3.5 fps ∼1% +52%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.3 fps ∼1% +43%
Sony Xperia L1
2.6 fps ∼1% +13%
Huawei Y6 2017
2.5 fps ∼1% +9%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
12 fps ∼7%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3.4 fps ∼2% -72%
LG X power2
8.6 fps ∼5% -28%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.2 fps ∼2% -73%
Sony Xperia L1
6.3 fps ∼4% -47%
Huawei Y6 2017
6 fps ∼3% -50%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
2.7 fps ∼1%
LG X power2
1.9 fps ∼1% -30%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼1% -30%
Huawei Y6 2017
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7
5.9 fps ∼0%
LG X power2
4.3 fps ∼0% -27%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼0% -68%
Huawei Y6 2017
fps ∼0% -100%

Legend

 
Huawei Y7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG X power2 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia L1 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 2017 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
25.972 Points ∼100% +26%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)
20.6 Points ∼79%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
17.643 Points ∼68% -14%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
17.372 Points ∼67% -16%
LG X power2 (Chrome 59)
16.743 Points ∼64% -19%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
14.55 Points ∼56% -29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
4560 Points ∼100% +42%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)
3209 Points ∼70%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
3092 Points ∼68% -4%
LG X power2 (Chrome 59)
2712 Points ∼59% -15%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
2684 Points ∼59% -16%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
2273 Points ∼50% -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
17405 ms * ∼100% -58%
LG X power2 (Chrome 59)
13762.8 ms * ∼79% -25%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
12506.5 ms * ∼72% -14%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
12254.8 ms * ∼70% -11%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)
11007 ms * ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
6820.9 ms * ∼39% +38%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
75 Points ∼100% +70%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
65 Points ∼87% +48%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
60 Points ∼80% +36%
LG X power2 (Chrome 59)
55 Points ∼73% +25%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)
44 Points ∼59%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Y7Lenovo Moto E4 PlusLG X power2Samsung Galaxy J7 2017Sony Xperia L1Huawei Y6 2017
AndroBench 3-5
51%
20%
20%
-21%
37%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
46.6
-26%
58.09 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
63.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
26.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-58%
26.4
-58%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.48 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.3
-20%
76.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
76.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
37.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-54%
48.4
-41%
Random Write 4KB
6.9
29.4
326%
10.7
55%
10.54
53%
5.9
-14%
20.54
198%
Random Read 4KB
53.15
19.15
-64%
25.3
-52%
25.86
-51%
13.6
-74%
25.93
-51%
Sequential Write 256KB
33.2
42
27%
41.7
26%
52.98
60%
40.2
21%
66.88
101%
Sequential Read 256KB
119.4
194.4
63%
243.8
104%
198.47
66%
181.9
52%
202.55
70%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InställningarVärde
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 InställningarVärde
 high30 fps
Hög belastning
 39.2 °C39.2 °C39.9 °C 
 39.3 °C38.3 °C40.7 °C 
 38.7 °C38.1 °C38.5 °C 
Max: 40.7 °C
Medel: 39.1 °C
33.6 °C34.7 °C36.2 °C
34.1 °C34.6 °C36.1 °C
34 °C35.5 °C35.8 °C
Max: 36.2 °C
Medel: 35 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  32.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.637.92525.439.23125.332.74032.9275033.627.86331.628.88028.428.31002731.212520.8311602232.220021.337.825020.843.631521.249.440019.457.250019.561.663017.766.980017.971.7100017.873.3125017.375.9160017.475.6200016.776.9250017.276.2315018.270.5400017.969.2500017.676.6630017.775800017.875.51000017.976.31250018.170.71600018.260.6SPL3085.9N1.364.9median 17.9Huawei Y7median 70.5Delta1.313.531.529.231.529.328.629.328.328.728.332.434.632.427.527.727.525.824.825.826.331.526.328.333.828.334.328.334.333.522.933.540.121.140.144.42044.448.42048.453.42253.459.922.959.965.519.365.566.918.366.971.818.371.872.517.972.57116.47172.516.572.573.216.773.271.216.271.273.216.173.27916.27979.816.179.871.116.171.165.616.165.66516654816.14885.829.985.862.11.462.1median 65.6Lenovo Moto E4 Plusmedian 17.9median 65.6122.812hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei Y7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Moto E4 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.12 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.57 / 1.61 / 1.62 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.09 / 4.26 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Y7
4000 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
5000 mAh
LG X power2
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
Sony Xperia L1
2620 mAh
Power Consumption
-17%
-33%
33%
-55%
Idle Minimum *
0.57
0.89
-56%
0.63
-11%
0.39
32%
0.89
-56%
Idle Average *
1.61
1.87
-16%
1.42
12%
1.06
34%
2.05
-27%
Idle Maximum *
1.62
1.98
-22%
1.47
9%
1.08
33%
2.18
-35%
Load Average *
3.09
3.04
2%
5.89
-91%
1.82
41%
6.02
-95%
Load Maximum *
4.26
4.01
6%
7.85
-84%
3.21
25%
6.94
-63%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
31tim 54min
Surfa med WLAN v1.3
11tim 56min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13tim 32min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
6tim 42min
Huawei Y7
4000 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
5000 mAh
LG X power2
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
Sony Xperia L1
2620 mAh
Huawei Y6 2017
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
10%
32%
24%
-28%
-17%
Reader / Idle
1914
2720
42%
1950
2%
1398
-27%
1522
-20%
H.264
812
1226
51%
1096
35%
656
-19%
693
-15%
WiFi v1.3
716
788
10%
982
37%
904
26%
567
-21%
654
-9%
Load
402
384
-4%
525
31%
223
-45%
302
-25%

För

+ elegant, stabilt metallhölje
+ låg vikt
+ precis GPS
+ bra samtalskvalitet på användarens sida
+ i huvudsak skarpa kamerabilder med exakta färger
+ ljusstark skärm
+ hög systemprestanda
+ bra batteritid

Emot

- utdaterade säkerhetsuppdateringar
- begränsad kvalitet på mikrofonen
- bilder tagna av den främre kameran är ofta för ljusa
- ingen snabbladdnings-funktion
In the test: Huawei Y7 (2017). Test unit provided by Huawei Germany.
In the test: Huawei Y7 (2017). Test unit provided by Huawei Germany.

Tillverkaren har satt ihop ett lockande paket med sin Huawei Y7. Huvudkamerans bilder är skarpa och har bra färgåtergivning. Du kan också spela in dugliga filmer med den. Huawei Y7 är särskilt för fans av kraftfulla smartphones som inte vill spendera mer än ~2 000 SEK (200€). Tack vare en kraftfull SoC presterar den bättre än andra i samma prisklass och överträffar även aningen dyrare modeller i fråga om ren datorkraft. Eftersom den också fungerar bra att använda, höljet passar bra i handen, batteriet håller länge och röstkvaliteten är övertygande åtminstone på användarens sida så känns helheten lyckad.

Huawei Y7 övertygar med i huvudsak skarpa bilder med bra färgåtergivning, ett stabilt metallhölje, lång batteritid och bra prestanda för sin prisklass. Den är värd att rekommendera, även om det finns en del detaljer som drar ner helhetsintrycket något.

Så vad finns det för anledning att tveka? Dels är det mikrofonen som inte presterar bra, bilder tagna utomhus av den främre kameran blir alldeles för ljusa och det kan också vara bra att tänka till kring mjukvarans utdaterade säkerhetsuppdateringar. Trots detta erbjuder Huawei Y7 fortfarande ett väldigt bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda för ~2 000 SEK (200€).

 

 

Huawei Y7 - 09/15/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Design
86%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 86%
Mus
91%
Anslutningar
32 / 60 → 54%
Vikt
91%
Batteri
95%
Skärm
86%
Spelprestanda
19 / 63 → 31%
Programprestanda
40 / 70 → 56%
Temperatur
88%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 61%
Camera
68%
Medel
70%
82%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Huawei Y7 (2017) (Sammanfattning)
Florian Wimmer, 2017-09-30 (Update: 2017-09-30)