Notebookcheck

Test: Gigabyte P57X v7 (sammanfattning)

Steve Schardein, 02/26/2017

Marginellt förbättrad. Få saker har förändrats sedan den förra Gigabyte P57X vi testade. Men med en ny Kaby Lake-CPU, mer RAM och en kraftigt förbättrad 4K-skärm kanske det är den här modellen man ska äga?

Gigabyte P57X v7 (P57 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Kärna: 1443 - 1645 MHz, Minne: 8000 MHz, 21.21.13.7586 - nVIDIA ForceWare 375.86
Minne
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2400, dual-channel (16 GB x 2)
Skärm
17.3 tum 16:9, 3840x2160 pixlar 255 PPI, no, SHP145E, IPS, glansig: nej
Hårddisk
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), 256 GB 
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Anslutningar
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Kopfhörer- / Mikrofon-Ports, Kortläsare: SD
Nätverk
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Optisk enhet
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 31 x 418 x 296
Batteri
75.81 Wh Litiumpolymer
Camera
Webbkamera: HD 720p
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2 x 2 W högtalare, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
3.412 kg, Strömförsörjning: 938 g

 

Front: DVD-RAM (hot swap bay)
Front: DVD-RAM (hot swap bay)
Rear: No connections
Rear: No connections
Left: Kensington Lock, Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.0 x 2, SD card reader, headphones, microphone
Left: Kensington Lock, Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.0 x 2, SD card reader, headphones, microphone
Right: USB 3.0, USB 3.1 Type-C, HDMI, mini-DP (beneath removable cover), VGA, charging port
Right: USB 3.0, USB 3.1 Type-C, HDMI, mini-DP (beneath removable cover), VGA, charging port
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
166 MB/s ∼100% +112%
Gigabyte P57X v7
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.2 MB/s ∼47%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼47% 0%
Gigabyte P57X v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76.4 MB/s ∼46% -2%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
224 MB/s ∼100% +148%
Gigabyte P57X v7
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
90.4 MB/s ∼40%
Gigabyte P57X v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89.9 MB/s ∼40% -1%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼39% -3%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
507 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
487 MBit/s ∼96%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
619 MBit/s ∼100%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
497 MBit/s ∼80% -20%
385.3
cd/m²
430.2
cd/m²
407.3
cd/m²
380.5
cd/m²
441.3
cd/m²
402.6
cd/m²
395.9
cd/m²
425.8
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Max: 441.3 cd/m² Medel: 407.7 cd/m² Minimum: 14.29 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 441.3 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1003:1 (Svärta: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | - Ø
100% sRGB (Argyll) 87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.08
Gigabyte P57X v7
SHP145E, IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
Gigabyte P57X v6
LGD0469, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 17.3, 1920x1080
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
Response Times
43%
41%
69%
16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
55.6
33.6
40%
37
33%
26
53%
45.6
18%
Response Time Black / White *
46.8
25.6
45%
24
49%
7
85%
35.2
25%
PWM Frequency
1000
1042
4%
Screen
-9%
10%
-25%
1%
Brightness
408
321
-21%
320
-22%
284
-30%
360
-12%
Brightness Distribution
86
93
8%
88
2%
85
-1%
81
-6%
Black Level *
0.44
0.267
39%
0.25
43%
0.25
43%
0.4
9%
Contrast
1003
1233
23%
1344
34%
1228
22%
998
0%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.1
5.93
-16%
3.61
29%
9.65
-89%
4.78
6%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.3
6.72
-56%
4.78
-11%
10.07
-134%
3.8
12%
Gamma
2.08 115%
2.12 113%
2.32 103%
2.12 113%
2.03 118%
CCT
7345 88%
7611 85%
6185 105%
12145 54%
7288 89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
87
57
-34%
88
1%
75
-14%
86.9
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
87
-13%
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
17% / 2%
26% / 16%
22% / -7%
9% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.4 ms rise
↘ 36.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (27.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.4 ms rise
↘ 37.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (43.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1000 Hz29 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 29 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 4352 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z RAM SPD
CPU-Z RAM SPD
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
ComputeMark
ComputeMark
LantencyMon
LantencyMon
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.95 Points ∼29% +14%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.71 Points ∼26%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.68 Points ∼25% -2%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points ∼22% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.6 Points ∼48% +19%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.04 Points ∼40%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7.75 Points ∼39% -4%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.44 Points ∼37% -7%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
Intel Core i7-7820HK
172 Points ∼77% +13%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
152 Points ∼68% 0%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
152 Points ∼68%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points ∼63% -7%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points ∼63% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
Intel Core i7-7820HK
864 Points ∼46% +17%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
736 Points ∼40%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
706 Points ∼38% -4%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
656 Points ∼35% -11%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
635 Points ∼34% -14%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
374.425 s * ∼4% -10%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
340.3 s * ∼4%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
224.726 s * ∼3% +34%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
572.296 Seconds * ∼3% -5%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
553 Seconds * ∼2% -1%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
546 Seconds * ∼2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.71 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.04 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
62.52 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
152 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
736 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
93.94 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Hjälp
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5014 Points ∼77% +19%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4623 Points ∼71% +10%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4218 Points ∼65%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
7780 Points ∼84% +51%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5192 Points ∼56% +1%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5161 Points ∼55%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
2303 Points ∼25% -55%
Home Score Accelerated v2
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4437 Points ∼74% +24%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4206 Points ∼70% +18%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4060 Points ∼68% +14%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
3569 Points ∼60%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3569 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5161 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4218 poäng
Hjälp
Gigabyte P57X v7
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Gigabyte P57X v6
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0)
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-2%
352%
174%
Write 4k QD32
296
274.9
-7%
553.5
87%
386.8
31%
Read 4k QD32
281.3
273.9
-3%
657.8
134%
601.1
114%
Write 4k
82.25
84.59
3%
141.3
72%
145.2
77%
Read 4k
26.04
25.93
0%
51.06
96%
51.61
98%
Write 512
306.1
314.4
3%
2445
699%
1254
310%
Read 512
315
303.1
-4%
1776
464%
1044
231%
Write Seq
305.7
315.4
3%
2572
741%
1249
309%
Read Seq
516.8
481.7
-7%
3219
523%
1658
221%
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Överföringshastighet min.: 359.5 MB/s
Överföringshastighet max.: 411.8 MB/s
Överföringshastighet med.: 400.7 MB/s
Accesstid: 0.1 ms
Burst rate: 83.3 MB/s
CPU-användning: 2.3 %
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
10945 Points ∼68% +20%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
9550 Points ∼60% +5%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
9116 Points ∼57%
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
8366 Points ∼52% -8%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
7795 Points ∼49% -14%
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
28675 Points ∼56% +23%
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
23356 Points ∼46% 0%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
23243 Points ∼46%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
22427 Points ∼44% -4%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
21228 Points ∼42% -9%
3DMark
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
4005 Points ∼40%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
3957 Points ∼39% -1%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
8357 Points ∼62% +1%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
8236 Points ∼61%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
8057 Points ∼59% -2%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
21026 Points ∼52% +22%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
17170 Points ∼42%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
17106 Points ∼42% 0%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
15718 Points ∼39% -8%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
127933 Points ∼78% +70%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
100453 Points ∼61% +34%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
84341 Points ∼52% +12%
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
79578 Points ∼49% +6%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
75190 Points ∼46%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
258199 Points ∼67% +123%
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
123302 Points ∼32% +6%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
116033 Points ∼30%
3DMark 06 Standard
28053 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
16753 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
24337 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13444 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
7498 poäng
Hjälp
Batman: Arkham Knight - 3840x2160 High / On (Interactive Smoke & Paper Debris Off) AA:SM AF:8x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
47 fps ∼81%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
45 fps ∼78% -4%
Mafia 2 - 1920x1080 high AA:0x AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
156.3 fps ∼71%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
43 fps ∼55%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
37.4 fps ∼48% -13%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
40.6 fps ∼52% -6%
Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
116.3 fps ∼79%
Fallout 4 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
42 fps ∼46%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
44.3 fps ∼48% +5%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
130 fps ∼60%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
123.8 fps ∼58% -5%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
131.8 fps ∼61% +1%
låg med. hög ultra4K
Mafia 2 (2010) 156.3fps
Sleeping Dogs (2012) 116.3fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 130fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 47fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 42fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 43fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
30.4 / 32.1 / 32.1 dB(A)
Hög belastning
45.6 / 51.5 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0)
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Noise
-4%
-7%
-6%
-4%
off / environment *
29
29.7
-2%
31
-7%
30
-3%
29.2
-1%
Idle Minimum *
30.4
33.2
-9%
33
-9%
34
-12%
33.9
-12%
Idle Average *
32.1
33.2
-3%
34
-6%
35
-9%
33.9
-6%
Idle Maximum *
32.1
33.2
-3%
40
-25%
37
-15%
33.9
-6%
Load Average *
45.6
47.5
-4%
44
4%
39
14%
43.8
4%
Load Maximum *
51.5
52.5
-2%
50
3%
56
-9%
53.4
-4%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 26.8 °C51.2 °C39.2 °C 
 27.8 °C38.8 °C41.4 °C 
 23.6 °C21.6 °C20.4 °C 
Max: 51.2 °C
Medel: 32.3 °C
35.8 °C56.8 °C27 °C
27.4 °C28 °C21.8 °C
20.8 °C21 °C22.8 °C
Max: 56.8 °C
Medel: 29 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  53 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.732.838.72535.332.235.33133.634.733.64032.634.332.65030.432.930.46331.23031.28030.929.930.910030.830.630.812532.332.432.316034.427.434.42003926.43925045.225.345.23154626.34640046.925.846.950051.325.451.363054.524.454.580051.424.551.4100054.423.554.4125059.123.559.116005924.359200058.623.258.6250061.922.661.9315061.422.861.4400061.322.961.35000582358630050.122.750.1800056.722.856.71000056.822.856.81250051.322.951.31600047.822.947.8SPL70.535.770.5N25.42.525.4median 51.4Gigabyte P57X v7median 23.5median 51.4Delta5.82.15.843.943.736.635.230.130.332.638.131.634.529.941.530.947.829.550.9255322.758.922.568.521.769.720.771.820.27719.875.419.471.418.972.319.472.619.2712067.318.96818.474.718.473.618.166.518.365.618.468.118.46418.462.318.56118.555.831.183.11.560.7median 19.2Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LGmedian 68.11.64.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Gigabyte P57X v7 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.46 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 32%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 32%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.37 / 0.8 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 15.7 / 23.4 / 23.5 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 184.6 / 233.1 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte P57X v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0), TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Power Consumption
-2%
-31%
-38%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
15.7
18.4
-17%
25
-59%
29
-85%
27.3
-74%
Idle Average *
23.4
22.8
3%
35
-50%
35
-50%
34.9
-49%
Idle Maximum *
23.5
24
-2%
46
-96%
40
-70%
37.6
-60%
Load Average *
184.6
175.5
5%
103
44%
94
49%
164.4
11%
Load Maximum *
233.1
229.5
2%
223
4%
315
-35%
202.5
13%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
4tim 16min
Surfa med WLAN v1.3
2tim 35min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 38min
Gigabyte P57X v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 75.81 Wh
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 75.81 Wh
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 88 Wh
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 75.2 Wh
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 74.48 Wh
Battery Runtime
33%
10%
3%
-15%
Reader / Idle
256
418
63%
278
9%
242
-5%
Load
98
103
5%
89
-9%
55
-44%
WiFi v1.3
155
201
30%
200
29%
160
3%
160
3%

För

+ hög GPU-prestanda; de flesta spel kan spelas i 4K
+ snabb och bra systemprestanda överlag
+ förbättrad 4K-skärm
+ hanterbara medeltemperaturer
+ användbar systemmjukvara
+ relativt portabel för en 17-tummare
+ expansionsporten är användbar

Emot

- plastchassi (knarrar på testenheten)
- dåliga pekplatte-knappar
- två tydliga hotspots och varmt tangentbord under belastning
- fortfarande relativt högljudd, men bättre än föregångaren
- batteritiden är märkbart sämre än förut
In review: Gigabyte P57X v7. Test model provided by Gigabyte.
In review: Gigabyte P57X v7. Test model provided by Gigabyte.

Läs det längre originaltestet på engelska här

Egentligen har inte mycket förändrats mellan P57X v6 och den nyare v7 som vi testat idag. Båda har identiska plastchassin, liknande krestkort och interna komponenter, och till och med samma GPU och SSD. De största (och kanske enda märkbara) skillnaderna i v7 är en Kaby Lake Core i7-7700HQ-CPU, bättre 4K-skärm och dubbelt så mycket RAM (med snabbare minneshastighet).

Allt detta bidrar till lägre fläktnivåer, mindre värmeutveckling (även om ett par specifika områden är särskilt varma), och en mycket trevligare visuell upplevelse tack vare den kraftigt förbättrade bildskärmen (bättre ljusstyrka, färgrymd och naturligtvis upplösning). 

Däremot kvarstår problem på andra håll. Chassit är inte mycket att hurra för och locket på skärmen verkar lite tunt. Ljudet är fortfarande ganska högt (men programvara för ingår), och styrplattan är helt enkelt dålig. Batteritiden har också minskat sedan den senaste modellen. Det vore egentligen ingen överraskning med tanke på skärmupplösningen och mer RAM, om det inte vore för det faktum att våra mätningar av strömförbrukningen tyder på annat. Oavsett vilket är det här en bärbar speldator, så batteritiden är mindre viktig.

Svarstiderna är egentligen den enda negativa man kan säga om skärmen, då de skulle kunna vara problematiska i FPS-spel. Genom att välja en 1080p-panel skulle man sannolikt få bättre svarstider (så var fallet med v6-panelen), men som det är nu går det inte att få det bästa av två världar.

Även om det finns snabbare och mer välbyggda bärbara speldatorer är Gigabyte P57X v7 ett kraftfullt alternativ med bra skärm. Den hanterar hög belastning utan problem och har expansionsmöjligheter för den som gärna laborerar själv. Förutsatt att du inte lägger stor vikt vid batteritiden, eller besväras av chassit och den mediokra styrplattan, är datorn inget dåligt val.

Gigabyte P57X v7 - 04/25/2017 v6
Steve Schardein

Design
74 / 98 → 76%
Tangentbord
79%
Mus
67%
Anslutningar
67 / 81 → 83%
Vikt
54 / 66 → 79%
Batteri
67%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
95%
Programprestanda
86%
Temperatur
88 / 95 → 93%
Ljudnivå
76 / 90 → 84%
Audio
40%
Camera
69 / 85 → 81%
Medel
73%
82%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Gigabyte P57X v7 (sammanfattning)
Steve Schardein, 2017-02-26 (Update: 2017-02-26)