Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Alcatel 3V Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Alcatel 3V | |
| HTC Desire 12 | |
| Gigaset GS270 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Honor 7C | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Alcatel 3V | |
| HTC Desire 12 | |
| Gigaset GS270 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Honor 7C | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 463 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1689:1 (Svärta: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.95 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
| Alcatel 3V IPS, 2160x1080, 6.00 | Honor 7C IPS, 1440x720, 5.99 | Gigaset GS270 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20 | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99 | HTC Desire 12 IPS, 1440x720, 5.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -22% | -17% | 4% | 10% | |
| Brightness middle | 473 | 392 -17% | 487 3% | 620 31% | 502 6% |
| Brightness | 462 | 403 -13% | 476 3% | 612 32% | 499 8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 85 -6% | 89 -1% | 96 7% | 84 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.61 -118% | 0.35 -25% | 0.57 -104% | 0.2 29% |
| Contrast | 1689 | 643 -62% | 1391 -18% | 1088 -36% | 2510 49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.95 | 5.4 -9% | 6.39 -29% | 3.46 30% | 5.4 -9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.1 | 9.7 20% | 14.24 -18% | 7.88 35% | 10.8 11% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 4.2 28% | 8.6 -48% | 3.9 33% | 6.2 -7% |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.59 85% | 1.91 115% | 2.073 106% | 2.07 106% |
| CCT | 7779 84% | 6734 97% | 7366 88% | 7230 90% | 7660 85% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 3V | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Gigaset GS270 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| HTC Desire 12 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8735 (34009 - 36177, n=3) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 3V | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Gigaset GS270 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| HTC Desire 12 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8735 (2.9 - 6.2, n=3) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 3V | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Gigaset GS270 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| HTC Desire 12 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8735 (3 - 4.3, n=3) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 3V | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Gigaset GS270 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| HTC Desire 12 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8735 (2.5 - 4.3, n=3) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Alcatel 3V | |
| Honor 7C | |
| Gigaset GS270 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| HTC Desire 12 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8735 (1.9 - 2.5, n=3) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Honor 7C (Chrome 66) | |
| Gigaset GS270 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Alcatel 3V (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Mediatek MT8735 (15.4 - 18.3, n=3) | |
| HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=212, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Honor 7C (Chrome 66) | |
| Alcatel 3V (Chrome 67) | |
| Gigaset GS270 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158) | |
| Average Mediatek MT8735 (2290 - 3312, n=3) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158) | |
| Gigaset GS270 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Alcatel 3V (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Mediatek MT8735 (12334 - 13705, n=3) | |
| Honor 7C (Chrome 66) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Alcatel 3V (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Mediatek MT8735 (53 - 64, n=3) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Alcatel 3V | Honor 7C | Gigaset GS270 Plus | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | HTC Desire 12 | Average 16 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 152% | 129% | 203% | 125% | 57% | 1560% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 219.4 | 297 35% | 269.1 23% | 270 23% | 211.4 -4% | 164.5 ? -25% | 1502 ? 585% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 47.35 | 115 143% | 72.8 54% | 194.5 311% | 103.8 119% | 43 ? -9% | 1111 ? 2246% |
| Random Read 4KB | 24.8 | 30 21% | 35.3 42% | 79.5 221% | 16.69 -33% | 21.7 ? -12% | 247 ? 896% |
| Random Write 4KB | 10.38 | 10 -4% | 11.51 11% | 7.1 -32% | 7.54 -27% | 8.08 ? -22% | 271 ? 2511% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 21.38 ? | 83.9 ? 292% | 80.8 278% | 84.4 295% | 81.8 ? 283% | 59.1 ? 176% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 11.92 ? | 62.6 ? 425% | 55.5 366% | 59.5 399% | 61.1 ? 413% | 39.8 ? 234% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Alcatel 3V audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 50.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 50.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 50.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (115.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Gigaset GS270 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.1 / 1.2 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  1.6 / 1.8 / 2.7 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
5.5 / 6.3 Watt |
    
| |
| Alcatel 3V 3000 mAh | Honor 7C 3000 mAh | Gigaset GS270 Plus 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh | HTC Desire 12 2730 mAh | Average Mediatek MT8735 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 29% | 27% | -3% | 20% | -23% | 14% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.6 | 0.6 62% | 1.1 31% | 0.7 56% | 1.13 29% | 1.353 ? 15% | 0.897 ? 44% |
| Idle Average * | 1.8 | 2.16 -20% | 1.6 11% | 2.8 -56% | 2.03 -13% | 3.14 ? -74% | 1.452 ? 19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.7 | 2.24 17% | 1.9 30% | 3.4 -26% | 2.05 24% | 3.58 ? -33% | 1.629 ? 40% |
| Load Average * | 5.5 | 2.59 53% | 3.6 35% | 4.2 24% | 3.68 33% | 6.23 ? -13% | 5.55 ? -1% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.3 | 4.11 35% | 4.5 29% | 7.2 -14% | 4.52 28% | 7.07 ? -12% | 8.31 ? -32% |
* ... smaller is better
| Alcatel 3V 3000 mAh | Honor 7C 3000 mAh | Gigaset GS270 Plus 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh | HTC Desire 12 2730 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 341 | 693 103% | 747 119% | 497 46% | 440 29% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Alcatel 3V får jämförelsevis medelmåttiga resultat i våra prestandatester, i huvudsak på grund av en utdaterad SoC. Den gamla hårdvaran påverkar även batteritiden, då 3V är bedrövlig på den punkten jämfört med våra jämförelseenheter.
Alcatel 3V är en billig mittenskiktstelefon som hålls tillbaka av utdaterad hårdvara och kort batteritid. På grund av dessa anledningar kan 3V inte tävla med sina likvärdigt prissatta konkurrenter.
Bortsett från dessa faktorer är 3V är en gedigen enhet tack vare en imponerande kamera och en skaplig skärm. Enheten kommer dessutom med Android Oreo 8.0, vilket inte är självklart för mittenskikts-enheter. Det är heller inte ofta vi ser enheter som har stöd för dual-SIM och microSD-kort samtidigt, vilket är en fördel med 3V. I stort gillade vi designen och konstruktionskvaliteten, men den kan se billig ut när man jämför den med konkurrenter som har metallhöljen.
Alcatel 3V
-
07/02/2018 v6(old)
Mike Wobker
Pricecompare
