Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 - Utan tvekan den bästa Android-surfplattan på 11 tum (Sammanfattning)
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90.1 % | 10/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650 | 500 g | 6.3 mm | 11.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 90.4 % | 04/2020 | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU | 471 g | 5.9 mm | 11.00" | 2388x1668 | |
| 88.4 % | 08/2020 | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16 | 460 g | 7.2 mm | 10.80" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.1 % | 10/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650 | 575 g | 5.7 mm | 12.40" | 2800x1752 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide-angle lensWide-angle lens5X zoomLow-light photographyUltra wide-angle lens
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 554 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1679:1 (Svärta: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.32
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 LTPS, 2560x1600, 11.00 | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 IPS, 2388x1668, 11.00 | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.80 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus Super AMOLED, 2800x1752, 12.40 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 18% | -20% | -14% | |
| Brightness middle | 554 | 617 11% | 606 9% | 441 -20% |
| Brightness | 535 | 585 9% | 579 8% | 447 -16% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 84 -8% | 89 -2% | 98 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.36 -9% | 0.32 3% | |
| Contrast | 1679 | 1714 2% | 1894 13% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 0.94 55% | 2.9 -38% | 2.4 -14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.1 | 1.87 74% | 6 15% | 4.1 42% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.4 12% | 4.3 -169% | 2.9 -81% |
| Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.156 102% | 2.22 99% | 2.01 109% |
| CCT | 6623 98% | 6733 97% | 7272 89% | 6469 100% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 59520 Hz | ≤ 21 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 59520 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 21 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 59520 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17803 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (13629 - 19824, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (12355 - 14979, n=6) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (41 - 82, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 120, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (75 - 93, n=5) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro | |
| Average of class Tablet (5 - 351, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (490260 - 622888, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
| Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 329, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (69.8 - 75.5, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (121.7 - 131.5, n=4) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| Average of class Tablet (57.3 - 135.7, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
| Average of class Tablet (34 - 414, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (114 - 126, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
| Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 571, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (41.2 - 73.3, n=4) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (25953 - 27360, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
| Average of class Tablet (2672 - 105035, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Tablet (326 - 34733, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (1854 - 1947, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 1% | 4% | 8% | -27% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1512 | 1789 18% | 1675 11% | 1599 ? 6% | 875 ? -42% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 680 | 399 -41% | 732 8% | 777 ? 14% | 562 ? -17% |
| Random Read 4KB | 219 | 224.6 3% | 230.1 5% | 244 ? 11% | 169.7 ? -23% |
| Random Write 4KB | 211.5 | 262.4 24% | 205 -3% | 245 ? 16% | 155.9 ? -26% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 86 ? | 82.4 ? -4% | 85.8 ? 0% | 85.9 ? 0% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 69 ? | 71.7 ? 4% | 69.3 ? 0% | 68.8 ? 0% |
PUBG
Asphalt 9 Legends
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 361 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.01 / 0.11 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  1.16 / 4.42 / 4.43 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
8.86 / 11.6 Watt |
    
| |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 8000 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 7538 mAh | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 7250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus 10090 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -25% | -13% | -5% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.16 | 1.3 -12% | 1.98 -71% | 2.41 -108% |
| Idle Average * | 4.42 | 3.5 21% | 5.66 -28% | 3.4 23% |
| Idle Maximum * | 4.43 | 5.6 -26% | 5.69 -28% | 3.43 23% |
| Load Average * | 8.86 | 12.5 -41% | 6.96 21% | 6.63 25% |
| Load Maximum * | 11.6 | 19.2 -66% | 6.98 40% | 10.29 11% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 8000 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 7538 mAh | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 7250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus 10090 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 2% | 4% | -18% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1963 | 2001 2% | 1877 -4% | 898 -54% |
| H.264 | 885 | 936 6% | 909 3% | 620 -30% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 811 | 902 11% | 891 10% | 425 -48% |
| Load | 221 | 197 -11% | 233 5% | 355 61% |
För
Emot
Verdict: Galaxy Tab S7 - Samsung gör många saker rätt, men inte allt
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 är en lockande Android-platta som kan kan stå sig mot resten av toppskiktet, om än på ett aningen ekonomiskt vis. Faktum är att den enda egentliga konkurrenten från Android-världen är Huaweis MatePad Pro, som har en del svagheter som Tab S7 inte har. Samsungs platta har en fingeravtrycksläsare, en 120 Hz-skärm och inget kamerahål som gör skärmen runt det mörkare. Vidare har Tab S7 stöd för Google Play-tjänsterna, vilket Huaweis platta inte har.
Utöver utmärkta högtalare, snabb UFS-lagring och en kraftfull Qualcomm SoC gillade vi att S Pen, med sina många funktioner, ingår. Tab S7 har riktigt hög konstruktionskvalitet. Men de matta ytorna gör den inte särskilt greppvänlig.
Galaxy Tab S7 är en utmärkt Android-surfplatta som inte behandlats så väl som den förtjänar.
Generellt sett är denna lyxiga surfplatta öppen för mer kritik än Galaxy S20-telefonerna. Som exempel har den inte lyxfunktioner som IP-certifiering, NFC-chip eller trådlös laddning. Med tanke på enhetens höga utgångspris är det märkligt att förpackningen inte innehåller en snabbladdare på 45 W. Det är också svårt att förstå varför Tab S7 bara har 6 GB RAM när det fanns en 8 GB-version av Tab S6 och Note 20 Ultra faktiskt kommer med hela 16 GB RAM. Vidare är det märkligt att mobilnätsversionen av Tab S7 bara kommer med ett 4G-modem.
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
-
10/15/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich