Notebookcheck

Test: Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018) Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Manuel Masiero (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 07/02/2018

Natt och Dag. Med Galaxy A6 (2018) släpper Samsung en tjusig mittenskiktstelefon som får stora poäng på sin Super AMOLED-skärm på 5.6 tum samt sina två kameror på 16 MP. I vår recension visade sig denna Android-telefon vara riktigt kapabel, men den har även några svagheter.

Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Galaxy Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Minne
3072 MB 
Skärm
5.6 tum 18.5:9, 1480 x 720 pixlar 294 PPI, kapacitiv, Super AMOLED, 16 miljoner färger, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22.8 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: MicroSD-kort upp till 256 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: rörelsesensor, fingeravtrycksläsare, närhetssensor, Wi-Fi Direct, USB OTG, Smart Ready, ANT+
Nätverk
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, ​900, ​1800, ​1900 MHz), UMTS (850, ​900, ​1900, ​2100 MHz), LTE Cat.6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40), Nedladdning 300 Mb/s, Uppladdning 50 Mb/s, SAR (Huvud) 0,467 W/kg, SAR (Kropp) 1,386 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.7 x 149.9 x 70.9
Batteri
3000 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/1.7 bländare, 4608x3456 för foton, [email protected] FPS för video
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/1.9 bländare, 4608x3456 för foton, [email protected] FPS för video
Övrigt
Högtalare: en högtalare på vänstersidan mot toppen, Tangentbord: virtuellt, modulär laddare, USB-kabel (USB Typ A till micro-USB Typ B), hörlurar, SIM-kortsverktyg, snabbstartsguide, Samsung Experience 9.0, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless
Vikt
162 g, Strömförsörjning: 30 g
Pris
309 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
310 MBit/s ∼100% +158%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
251 MBit/s ∼81% +109%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s ∼78% +102%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼69% +78%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 939, n=220)
197 MBit/s ∼64% +64%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
120 MBit/s ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.9 MBit/s ∼17% -55%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
311 MBit/s ∼100% +153%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼90% +128%
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.8 - 703, n=220)
190 MBit/s ∼61% +54%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
167 MBit/s ∼54% +36%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s ∼48% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
123 MBit/s ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼18% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018): Hela rutten
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018): Hela rutten
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018): Bro
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018): Bro
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018): Vändpunkt
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018): Vändpunkt
Garmin Edge 500: Hela rutten
Garmin Edge 500: Hela rutten
Garmin Edge 500: Bro
Garmin Edge 500: Bro
Garmin Edge 500: Vändpunkt
Garmin Edge 500: Vändpunkt

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
445
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 481 cd/m² Medel: 458.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.26 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 453 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
95.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.07
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
Super AMOLED, 1480x720, 5.6
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Screen
26%
9%
-131%
27%
-15%
Brightness middle
453
539
19%
454
0%
458
1%
761
68%
620
37%
Brightness
459
542
18%
463
1%
473
3%
723
58%
612
33%
Brightness Distribution
93
93
0%
86
-8%
88
-5%
90
-3%
96
3%
Black Level *
0.51
0.69
0.57
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.6
1.6
38%
2
23%
7.1
-173%
2.4
8%
3.46
-33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.2
2.6
72%
5.3
42%
14.5
-58%
5.2
43%
7.88
14%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
1.5
6%
1.7
-6%
10.5
-556%
1.8
-13%
3.9
-144%
Gamma
2.07 116%
2.28 105%
2.1 114%
2.28 105%
2.21 109%
2.073 116%
CCT
6356 102%
6422 101%
6394 102%
8951 73%
6312 103%
7230 90%
Contrast
898
1103
1088

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 238.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10727 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.6 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
46779 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
60603 Points ∼85% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
47339 Points ∼66% +1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points ∼92% +42%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
71635 Points ∼100% +53%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
60490 Points ∼84% +29%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (44191 - 47339, n=7)
45754 Points ∼64% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23540 - 230421, n=316)
70825 Points ∼99% +51%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
61794 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
61811 Points ∼56% 0%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
82343 Points ∼75% +33%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
90347 Points ∼82% +46%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
76178 Points ∼69% +23%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (61794 - 61825, n=3)
61810 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (52439 - 266981, n=91)
109675 Points ∼100% +77%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3809 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4060 Points ∼83% +7%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3722 Points ∼76% -2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points ∼100% +29%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
4875 Points ∼99% +28%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4905 Points ∼100% +29%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (3722 - 3889, n=5)
3793 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 8601, n=181)
4487 Points ∼91% +18%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
4878 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5035 Points ∼86% +3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
4920 Points ∼84% +1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points ∼100% +21%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5712 Points ∼97% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
5801 Points ∼99% +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (3691 - 5006, n=7)
4748 Points ∼81% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 10264, n=344)
4696 Points ∼80% -4%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
732 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
659 Points ∼71% -10%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
10 Points ∼1% -99%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points ∼87% +10%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
925 Points ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
722 Points ∼78% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (10 - 737, n=7)
593 Points ∼64% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=419)
675 Points ∼73% -8%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
533 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1528 Points ∼100% +187%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
533 Points ∼35% 0%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points ∼66% +90%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1523 Points ∼100% +186%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1017 Points ∼67% +91%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (511 - 534, n=7)
526 Points ∼34% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=419)
1517 Points ∼99% +185%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
1096 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1508 Points ∼100% +38%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1265 Points ∼84% +15%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points ∼69% -5%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1213 Points ∼80% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
961 Points ∼64% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1096 - 1362, n=7)
1252 Points ∼83% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4423, n=419)
1116 Points ∼74% +2%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
2201 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
2593 Points ∼74% +18%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2368 Points ∼68% +8%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points ∼100% +59%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3249 Points ∼93% +48%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3236 Points ∼93% +47%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (2127 - 2368, n=7)
2239 Points ∼64% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=419)
2224 Points ∼64% +1%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
985 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1408 Points ∼92% +43%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
353 Points ∼23% -64%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points ∼86% +33%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1535 Points ∼100% +56%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1229 Points ∼80% +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (353 - 1022, n=7)
908 Points ∼59% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=422)
1133 Points ∼74% +15%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
2371 Points ∼60%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3763 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3316 Points ∼85%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (2332 - 2371, n=3)
2357 Points ∼60%
Average of class Smartphone (773 - 14362, n=117)
3924 Points ∼100%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3741 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3777 Points ∼86% +1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points ∼100% +17%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
4011 Points ∼92% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4292 Points ∼98% +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (3704 - 3777, n=4)
3733 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 10558, n=163)
4056 Points ∼93% +8%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
732 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
736 Points ∼61% +1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points ∼77% +27%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
822 Points ∼68% +12%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
870 Points ∼72% +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (726 - 736, n=4)
732 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4265, n=164)
1207 Points ∼100% +65%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
1709 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1713 Points ∼80% 0%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1522 Points ∼71% -11%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points ∼100% +25%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1822 Points ∼85% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2038 Points ∼96% +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1522 - 1727, n=7)
1668 Points ∼78% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (531 - 3669, n=271)
1555 Points ∼73% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
211 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
710 Points ∼66% +236%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
199 Points ∼19% -6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points ∼35% +80%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
721 Points ∼67% +242%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
379 Points ∼35% +80%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (185 - 253, n=7)
223 Points ∼21% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 5212, n=271)
1069 Points ∼100% +407%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
262 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
816 Points ∼80% +211%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
247 Points ∼24% -6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points ∼45% +77%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
833 Points ∼82% +218%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
463 Points ∼45% +77%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (231 - 312, n=7)
277 Points ∼27% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 4732, n=279)
1021 Points ∼100% +290%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
1705 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1752 Points ∼82% +3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1535 Points ∼72% -10%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points ∼100% +25%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1802 Points ∼85% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2058 Points ∼97% +21%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1522 - 1705, n=7)
1641 Points ∼77% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (537 - 3642, n=301)
1452 Points ∼68% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
264 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1053 Points ∼73% +299%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
278 Points ∼19% +5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points ∼51% +175%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1258 Points ∼88% +377%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
732 Points ∼51% +177%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (264 - 407, n=7)
344 Points ∼24% +30%
Average of class Smartphone (54 - 8252, n=301)
1433 Points ∼100% +443%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
325 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1155 Points ∼86% +255%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
340 Points ∼25% +5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points ∼63% +161%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1348 Points ∼100% +315%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
854 Points ∼63% +163%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (325 - 490, n=7)
416 Points ∼31% +28%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 6378, n=309)
1231 Points ∼91% +279%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
6184 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13057 Points ∼77% +111%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12955 Points ∼76% +109%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points ∼100% +176%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
12845 Points ∼75% +108%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
15593 Points ∼91% +152%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (6184 - 12955, n=7)
11813 Points ∼69% +91%
Average of class Smartphone (5462 - 36494, n=454)
12116 Points ∼71% +96%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
5376 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13314 Points ∼72% +148%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
7456 Points ∼40% +39%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points ∼72% +147%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
18449 Points ∼100% +243%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13219 Points ∼72% +146%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (5376 - 7793, n=7)
7104 Points ∼39% +32%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=454)
15555 Points ∼84% +189%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
5537 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13256 Points ∼79% +139%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
8318 Points ∼49% +50%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points ∼83% +152%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
16818 Points ∼100% +204%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13682 Points ∼81% +147%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (5537 - 8550, n=7)
7789 Points ∼46% +41%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=455)
13433 Points ∼80% +143%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
12 fps ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
34 fps ∼100% +183%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼35% 0%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps ∼68% +92%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
30 fps ∼88% +150%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
23 fps ∼68% +92%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (12 - 12, n=7)
12 fps ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.2 - 177, n=480)
26.9 fps ∼79% +124%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
19 fps ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
33 fps ∼100% +74%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
12 fps ∼36% -37%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps ∼67% +16%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
28 fps ∼85% +47%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
17 fps ∼52% -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (11 - 20, n=7)
17 fps ∼52% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (7.5 - 120, n=483)
23.4 fps ∼71% +23%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
5.4 fps ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼100% +178%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼34% -6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps ∼65% +81%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
14 fps ∼93% +159%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.9 fps ∼66% +83%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (4.9 - 5.4, n=7)
5.07 fps ∼34% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=405)
14.3 fps ∼95% +165%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
10 fps ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼100% +50%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
5.1 fps ∼34% -49%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps ∼64% -4%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
13 fps ∼87% +30%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.4 fps ∼63% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (4.5 - 10, n=7)
8.29 fps ∼55% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=407)
14.4 fps ∼96% +44%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3.2 fps ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9.1 fps ∼72% +184%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.3 fps ∼26% +3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps ∼51% +100%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
9.8 fps ∼78% +206%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.5 fps ∼52% +103%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1.7 - 3.3, n=7)
3 fps ∼24% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=270)
12.6 fps ∼100% +294%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
6.9 fps ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9 fps ∼71% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3.2 fps ∼25% -54%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps ∼50% -9%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
9.4 fps ∼75% +36%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.2 fps ∼49% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (2.8 - 7.4, n=7)
5.93 fps ∼47% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (2.5 - 110, n=272)
12.6 fps ∼100% +83%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
2 fps ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼60% +160%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼22% -5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼40% +75%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5.6 fps ∼65% +180%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.5 fps ∼40% +75%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1.8 - 2, n=7)
1.9 fps ∼22% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1.9 - 35, n=201)
8.65 fps ∼100% +333%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
4 fps ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼66% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
1.9 fps ∼24% -52%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼45% -12%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5.3 fps ∼68% +33%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.4 fps ∼43% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (1.7 - 4, n=7)
3.21 fps ∼41% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (3.8 - 50, n=204)
7.83 fps ∼100% +96%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Samsung Exynos 7880, ARM Mali-T830 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 7X HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 224, n=338)
34.4 Points ∼100% +65%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
32.222 Points ∼94% +54%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
27.971 Points ∼81% +34%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
26.837 Points ∼78% +29%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
25.972 Points ∼76% +24%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (20.9 - 26.4, n=7)
24.3 Points ∼71% +16%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
23.097 Points ∼67% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
20.877 Points ∼61%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
5256 Points ∼100% +41%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=474)
5017 Points ∼95% +34%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
5011 Points ∼95% +34%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
4560 Points ∼87% +22%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
4424 Points ∼84% +18%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
4424 Points ∼84% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (3739 - 4968, n=7)
4228 Points ∼80% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
3739 Points ∼71%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=493)
11862 ms * ∼100% -0%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
11807.6 ms * ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
10895 ms * ∼92% +8%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
9796.9 ms * ∼83% +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (6784 - 11808, n=7)
8761 ms * ∼74% +26%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
8741.5 ms * ∼74% +26%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
6820.9 ms * ∼58% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
6442.4 ms * ∼54% +45%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
112 Points ∼100% +26%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
108 Points ∼96% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=236)
98.4 Points ∼88% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
89 Points ∼79% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
89 Points ∼79%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
86 Points ∼77% -3%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
75 Points ∼67% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (64 - 89, n=7)
72.3 Points ∼65% -19%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy A6 2018Samsung Galaxy A5 2017Samsung Galaxy J7 2017BQ Aquaris X ProMotorola Moto G6 PlusXiaomi Redmi 5 PlusAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-9%
-10%
18%
130%
51%
8%
-4%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
55.98 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-15%
63.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
49.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-24%
62.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
59.46
-9%
45.2 (9.34 - 87.1, n=89)
-31%
42.8 (20.8 - 87.1, n=250)
-35%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
76.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
78.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-3%
83.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
84.38
4%
64.5 (15.6 - 96.5, n=89)
-21%
61.1 (36.5 - 96.5, n=250)
-25%
Random Write 4KB
10.68
12.13
14%
10.54
-1%
12.07
13%
62.76
488%
7.1
-34%
17.4 (0.75 - 74.9, n=129)
63%
13.3 (0.14 - 164, n=527)
25%
Random Read 4KB
24.54
22.41
-9%
25.86
5%
37.97
55%
58.39
138%
79.5
224%
34.2 (3.59 - 117, n=129)
39%
34 (1.59 - 173, n=527)
39%
Sequential Write 256KB
100.64
77.1
-23%
52.98
-47%
139.63
39%
216.09
115%
194.5
93%
90.6 (14.8 - 168, n=129)
-10%
70 (2.99 - 216, n=527)
-30%
Sequential Read 256KB
208.44
182.03
-13%
198.47
-5%
270.46
30%
286.64
38%
270
30%
224 (25.8 - 440, n=129)
7%
208 (12.1 - 832, n=527)
0%
Arena of Valor
 InställningarVärde
 high HD26 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
jämför
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (min)
 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP2
26
   ...
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
 630, Adreno 508
30
Motorola Moto G6
 450, Adreno 506
30
   ...
Razer Phone 2017 (max)
 835, Adreno 540
61
PUBG Mobile
 InställningarVärde
 Balanced13 fps
Hög belastning
 28.1 °C28 °C27.7 °C 
 29.3 °C28.4 °C27.9 °C 
 29 °C27.9 °C27.7 °C 
Max: 29.3 °C
Medel: 28.2 °C
27.5 °C27.5 °C27.1 °C
28.1 °C28.2 °C27.8 °C
27.6 °C28 °C28.1 °C
Max: 28.2 °C
Medel: 27.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  23.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
The maximum temp on the upper side is 29.3 °C, compared to the average of 35.9 °C ranging from 21.1 °C to 71 °C for class Smartphone.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.236.92532.938.73137.236.94031.737.95039.6376328.335.48027.332.910026.93212526.738.81602443.220020.947.225020.951.331519.556.240018.563.550017.566.863017.569.680015.772.8100015.872.4125016.675.6160015.872200015.471.9250015.574.231501671.2400015.880.750001679.9630016.372.8800016.372.71000016.271.41250016.465.51600016.463.2SPL28.687N1.167.8median 16.4Samsung Galaxy A6 2018median 71.2Delta2.17.831.641.125.44025.336.732.93633.635.631.630.628.432.92733.820.841.72244.421.348.420.850.521.256.619.462.519.566.217.766.117.974.217.877.317.374.317.473.816.771.817.269.318.269.517.966.517.661.417.755.817.854.517.959.918.152.218.249.530831.350.1median 17.9Samsung Galaxy A5 2017median 61.41.39.533.332.438.23534.145.534.934.343.336.928.627.925.825.524.224.32130.52141.520.150.119.955.818.260.417.964.517.667.916.472.916.572.715.875.315.474.715.174.115.273.815.274.615.177.715.17615.178.215.176.415.27115.267.315.360.715.144.427.986.9170median 15.4Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plusmedian 711.810.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.96 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.27 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.81 / 1.26 / 1.3 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 2.87 / 4.82 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
8%
31%
-28%
-13%
-73%
-17%
-28%
Idle Minimum *
0.81
0.64
21%
0.39
52%
0.67
17%
0.5
38%
0.7
14%
0.69 (0.37 - 1.18, n=7)
15%
0.855 (0.2 - 3.4, n=552)
-6%
Idle Average *
1.26
1.36
-8%
1.06
16%
1.7
-35%
1.78
-41%
2.8
-122%
1.966 (0.78 - 4.65, n=7)
-56%
1.692 (0.6 - 6.2, n=551)
-34%
Idle Maximum *
1.3
1.4
-8%
1.08
17%
1.78
-37%
1.81
-39%
3.4
-162%
2.06 (0.84 - 4.74, n=7)
-58%
1.928 (0.74 - 6.6, n=552)
-48%
Load Average *
2.87
2.53
12%
1.82
37%
4.42
-54%
3.3
-15%
4.2
-46%
2.85 (1.52 - 5.75, n=7)
1%
3.97 (0.8 - 10.8, n=546)
-38%
Load Maximum *
4.82
3.63
25%
3.21
33%
6.3
-31%
5.14
-7%
7.2
-49%
4.21 (2.75 - 6.97, n=7)
13%
5.58 (1.2 - 14.2, n=546)
-16%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
26tim 56min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10tim 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14tim 28min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
5tim 01min
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
39%
43%
-2%
6%
-18%
Reader / Idle
1616
2418
50%
1950
21%
1840
14%
1846
14%
H.264
868
984
13%
1096
26%
644
-26%
542
-38%
WiFi v1.3
608
843
39%
904
49%
730
20%
702
15%
497
-18%
Load
301
467
55%
525
74%
254
-16%
404
34%

För

+ tjusig design, bekväm att hålla i
+ utökningsbar intern lagring
+ Android 8.0
+ Dual-SIM plus MicroSD
+ ljusstark skärm med utmärkt färgåtergivning
+ håller sig sval vid drift
+ utmärkt batteritid

Emot

- varken skyddad mot vatten eller damm
- Micro-USB 2.0 istället för USB-C
- långsam WiFi
- PWM-flimmer
- stödjer inte snabbladdning
- medioker prestanda
Recenseras: Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018). Recensionsenhet från: notebooksbilliger.de
Recenseras: Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018). Recensionsenhet från: notebooksbilliger.de

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Samsung erbjuder en bra mittenskikts-smartphone med sin Galaxy A6 (2018), som får tävla mot kapabla konkurrenter. Den har ett flertal fördelar men också precis lika många nackdelar.

Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018) är en bra mittenskikts-smartphone som presterar sämre än sin föregångare Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) på ett antal områden.

Galaxy A6 (2018) får många poäng för sin utmärkta design, ljusstarka och välkalibrerade skärm och långa batteritid. Den har också uppdaterad Android (8.0 Oreo), riktig Dual SIM-funktionalitet samt utökningsbar lagring (den interna lagringen kan utökas med ett microSD-kort). Kameramodulen presterar inte särskilt bra: Huvudkameran på 16 MP producerar "okej" foton i dagsljus men får kämpa i situationer med lite ljus.

Galaxy A6 (2018) för ca 3000 kronor har en del brister. MicroUSB-porten är kraftigt utdaterad. Andra nackdelar inkluderar: Långsam WiFi, avsaknad av IP-certifiering och att den tar lång tid att ladda. Med sin Exynos 7870 SoC och ARM Mali T830 MP2-grafikenhet så har Galaxy A6 (2018) mer än tillräckligt med prestanda för vardagsanvändning. Men den är inte i närheten av tillräckligt kraftfull för spel. Totalt sett är föregångaren Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) ett bättre val, om du inte behöver stöd för Dual-SIM. Den har bättre prestanda till ett lägre pris.

Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 - 06/28/2018 v6
Manuel Masiero

Design
86%
Tangentbord
68 / 75 → 91%
Mus
88%
Anslutningar
42 / 60 → 69%
Vikt
91%
Batteri
94%
Skärm
87%
Spelprestanda
14 / 63 → 23%
Programprestanda
46 / 70 → 65%
Temperatur
96%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
72 / 91 → 79%
Camera
68%
Medel
73%
83%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018) Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Manuel Masiero, 2018-07- 2 (Update: 2018-07- 2)